Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Optimism Week continues. Today's installment will be tough, as there is an actual game to get in the way of the optimism. It's an important game, too. If the Giants win this, they're tied for first place. Tied! I spend my winter whining, and yet I can wake up tomorrow to a first-place team. This is a crazy game.
The starter for this must-win game is Noah Lowry, who was traded this offseason for a young hi...wait a sec. He's still here? How in the hell did that happen? Apparently, the Giants' only real trading chip wasn't quite as marketable as a lot of us thought. Brian Sabean says there wasn't much interest. I'm inclined to believe that, considering that Lowry was shut down at the end of last season with an injury. I'm also inclined to believe that "not much interest" translates into "all they offered us were yucky unproven players like Billy Butler!", or some variation thereof. But this is Optimism Week. Shame on you for thinking that.
Lowry's here for the season, so it's time to reminisce about just how danged exciting Lowry used to be. Before Sir Cain and St. Lincecum, Lowry was the young pitcher du jour. His minor league career was decent enough, but he got goofy with the changeup once he made it to the majors. I'll always remember this game, in which he allowed five baserunners in nine innings. Wily Mo Pena looked like someone slipped him Felix Rodriguez's scouting report before the game, as he had about six I-can't-believe-that's-not-a-98-mph-fastball hacks that completely screwed him into the ground. Good times.
It isn't as if Lowry was a late-season flash in the pan for 2004, though. He pitched 200 innings the next season with an above-average ERA and strikeout rate -- not too shabby for a 24-year-old pitcher in his first full major league season. When the 2006 season started, it wasn't unreasonable to think he would be a cornerstone of the franchise for the next few years. Then he tweaked the oblique, and his strikeout rate has never been the same. Maybe the scouting reports caught up with him, but it makes more sense to blame the injuries. After the oblique came tenderness. After the tenderness came bone chips. His control disappeared along the way.
So here's to a comeback season from Lowry. With a healthy arm, maybe the control comes back. With better location, maybe hitters are more likely to chase breaking balls and changeups. With better location, maybe his sub-mediocre fastball isn't something hitters can just sit on. Because if Lowry can regain even 75% of that 2005 magic, he'll be one of the most valuable properties the Giants control. Forget all of this pie-in-the-cove talk about how Fred Lewis might be a viable starter if things break just right, or how Kevin Frandsen might be a league-average second baseman; if Noah Lowry has a season just like the season he had three seasons ago, he'll be just as important to the rebuilding process as Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain. Not because he'll pitch as well, but because of the options the Giants would have with an above-average pitcher at a below-market rate.
There are limits to the optimism. When pitchers stop striking hitters out, it isn't as if they just need to hit the gym for an extra half-hour every week to get back what they lost. There might not be a way to get back what is lost. Three seasons ago might as well be four decades when talking about pitching arms.
It isn't a likely scenario, but it isn't an impossible scenario either. That's kind of the point of Optimism Week. Not likely, but not impossible. I'll take it.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Definately good times.
by WilliamVanLandingham on Feb 28, 2008 10:43 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Go Noah!
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
There was one weekday game in particular that I happened to catch by accident. He was really acting like something was bothering him. And he looked really off as I recall, and Alou left him because he kept working his way out of jams. I may have even posted or commented on it at the time. Later in the year, too, Alou pulled him from a game in Los Angeles and Alou and Rags got into a little noted shouting match in the dugout about the move. Nothing much was written about it.
So who really knows. Slight injuries lead to injuries in different parts of the body. Mechanics are subconsciously altered. Control and Velocity are just off a little bit. More therapy, adjustments to mechanics, look at video, vary grips, try a different arm slot; shorten stride, lengthen stride. A zillion different things tried.
I hope he can come back. But unless he has a way of acquiring and using some sort of peds, he is going to be facing some long odds. Not that he won't be a useful pitcher. The road is long and littered with Pitchers who could only come back 90 percent.
Like they say, In baseball, whether its success or failure, its just never one thing.
by E Ticket on Feb 28, 2008 9:38 AM PST reply actions
Very nice post
It happens. The guy gets surgery, rehabs, it's done with.
When the truth is neural mechanics / biocmechanics and pattern learning are very complex topics, and injuries affect not only soft tissue, but also potentially the neural system.
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Feb 28, 2008 10:06 AM PST reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
by howtheyscored on Feb 28, 2008 10:14 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Struck out and in the process made our big free agent acquisition look silly in his first AB.
by WilliamVanLandingham on Feb 28, 2008 10:46 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
by EliminateMe on Feb 28, 2008 10:49 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
That would be great!
I like Lowry and hope he does well.
by GreenLightJerky on Feb 28, 2008 11:17 AM PST reply actions
Re: That would be great!
Re: That would be great!
Re: That would be great!
OPPOSITE.
by lrs77 on Feb 29, 2008 9:27 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
by howtheyscored on Feb 28, 2008 3:03 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Just a thought. . .
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
by dotcomposer on Feb 28, 2008 11:20 PM PST reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
I see what you did there.
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Is it? I just feel like this is territory you've been around long enough to have tread many times before.
by howtheyscored on Feb 29, 2008 12:50 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
And by the way, Lowry should have been traded at midseason.
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
by daveinexile on Feb 29, 2008 10:39 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
First, I once thought Brian Sabean was right up there with guys like Billy Beane and John Schuerholtz as the top GM's in the game. So now, when Brian seems to constantly be behind the learning curve, I feel somewhat betrayed.
Second, no one seems to comment on this seemingly obvious idea of trading Noah in the first half or at least the first two-thirds of last season -- either saying, yeah, that's obvious or no, it didn't make sense at that time, and here's why.
On another board, one guy said at the time that the best time to get top value for a pitcher such as Noah wasn't at or before the trade deadline, but rather during the off-season. But that ignored the very real probability that Noah was pitching over his head and would regress more toward his actual pitching level. And as it turned out, it also ignored the possibility Noah would be seriously injured for the second season in a row.
Now Brian Sabean says that teams are low-balling the Giants for Noah. That raises the question of whether teams are properly reading Noah's foibles or whether Brian overvalues Noah. When Noah wasn't traded by last year's trade deadline, I raised the question of whether Brian hadn't tried to trade Noah or whether he overvalued Noah's talent.
Noah has a career ERA of just over four (4.03), which is actually better than Barry Zito's ERA over the past three seasons. Despite two serious injuries, Noah has exceeded 500 innings in the last three seasons. He's not a BAD pitcher. He's just not particularly good.
Couldn't the Giants have gotten a good hitter or at least a very good prospect for Noah last spring or early summer?
We don't know Brian's thinking process in that regard, but we do know that it appears he has (at least temporarily) missed his window of opportunity.
Could Noah Lowry be Brian's Carthage -- or has A.J. Pierzynski already reserved that title? Too bad Cato's not around to help us solve the dilemna.
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
It's almost impossible to believe that Sabean wasn't shopping Lowry or at least listening to offers. The only reasonable explanation is that nobody liked what they saw enough to part with what we need to get back in a trade involving Lowry.
by howtheyscored on Mar 2, 2008 2:15 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
"Obviously, it wasn't all good for the Giants' projected No. 3 starter."
So the Giants are going to put him before Zito, even though Zito is pitching opening day?
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
- Zito
- Cain
- Lincecum
- Correia/Sanchez
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
I'm hoping Lowry pulls it together this season and reminds us why we were so excited lo those few years ago.
by TedWilliamsBobbleHead on Feb 29, 2008 11:43 AM PST reply actions
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
As for the horrid performance, hey, it's spring training baybee. Lowry is working on some new stuff. Getting the rust off. Finding his mechanics. Insert Spring training games don't count baseball cliche. I'm worried about the 2008 Giants, but Noah Lowry will not be part of the problem.
Re: Lowry '08: Change Returns?
It's not that Noah is a horrible pitcher -- just that the time to trade a guy is when his value is highest. And before the trade deadline last season Cato's Baseball Player Analysis was saying that Noah's value was unlikely to ever be higher.

by 


















