Youth Movement
The three call-ups in whom I'm most interested:
- Nate Schierholtz
He has a real chance to be a part of the 2008 Giants, so the hope is that he flashes some of the power he showed in his Fresno tour of duty. His .364 average is sample-size soft, with at least a third of his 16 hits coming on end-of-the-bat flares, but it beats a string of Lindenian confidence-crushing strikeouts. The Giants could have a four-headed monster in center and right next year, with Schierholtz and Fred Lewis as the lefties, and Rajai Davis and Dan Ortmeier as the righties, but that would assume the Giants would be able to dump both Dave Roberts and Randy Winn. That doesn't seem like something Brian Sabean would do even if he could, but a fella can dream.
- Eugenio Velez
Woo hoo! Another fast outfielder! That's...something. Velez is a switch-hitter who had a decent season in AA, especially considering that the Eastern League, and Norwich specifically, hurts offensive numbers. As a middle infielder, he'd be more likely to be auditioning for a 2008 spot, but it's a pretty crowded outfield already. What I'm hoping for, though, is that he proves himself to be a data point for the "Dave Roberts isn't a bad player; he's just redundant on this team"-argument. Roberts is a speedster who can't hit lefties. Velez is a speedster who can't hit lefties, but who could also play the infield in a pinch. If the Giants do decide to go with the four-headed monster, Velez could be a good choice for the utility spot.
- Dan Giese
Pro: Fringe fastball, sweet breaking ball, plus command, and a great AAA season. Con: That all also applied to Scott Atchison. To be fair, Atchison's breaking ball has been incredibly inconsistent since coming to the majors, so it isn't right color Giese with the same crayon just because of Atchison's struggles. The Giants might be willing to trade a young reliever for some offensive help, and a lights-out month from Giese could help them make up their mind.
*Yes, I know that half of you out there are lawyers, were lawyers, or are studying to be lawyers. It's a joke. You jackals.
78 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Youth Movement
Although not a Sept callup I want to see Ortman get the majority of the starts at 1B because if he can hang in there for a month that might fill a spot for '08.
Re: Youth Movement
Rule: call-ups should be at least mildly interesting and have some good baseball playing ability.
Analysis: I'm most interested in Nate and Velez, although, I agree that if Velez were still a middle infielder, he'd be the most promising position player on the Giants above A ball.
I also really, really wish that Knoedler would get a call-up. He such a superior defensive catcher to all the others and he's put up pretty good numbers at Fresno this year. I like Bengie and he ain't going nowhere just yet, but G Rod and Eliezer are both pretty much garbage and Eliezer's defense especially leaves a lot to be desired.
with the OF glut, the team might not re-sign Bonds. If they do or not, I wouldn't be opposed to trading one of those guys for some infield help, which is going to be a huge problem this offseason with 4 holes to fill on the infield, even if Ort at first goes well.
Conclusion: Nate makes the club next year. Velez starts in Fresno with occasional call-ups during those Dave Roberts DL visits. Knoedler is an organizational player, I guess. Bonds 2008 or not, the Giants need some serious infield help and trading one of these young OFs may be what the doctor ordered, even if the Ort-at-first base thing sticks.
by nostocksjustbonds on Sep 4, 2007 2:25 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
Ralph: Do you see Ortmeier as your first baseman down the road going into next season?
Brian: That would be a pretty big leap of faith for me.
Re: Youth Movement
I am teh sad.
Re: Youth Movement
You could put Walrus Man at first and call it a youth movement. But at some point, you're going to have to evaluate the talent too. The list of 26-year-old players who came to the bigs with a .781 career minor league OPS and became productive first basemen can't be a long one.
by Grant Brisbee on Sep 4, 2007 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
by howtheyscored on Sep 4, 2007 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Meh
Been trying to think of something to post..
I will work for the minor league minimum though.
Re: Been trying to think of something to post..
Re: Been trying to think of something to post..
Re: Youth Movement
I'm guessing he wants to see more of him.
Re: Youth Movement
Maybe I'm too down on Velez. But doesn't it bother anyone that his season was bad? A .344 OBP with no power and a lot of strikeouts? From a 25-year-old in AA? That's bad.
And it's not just Dodd; he hit his lone home run on the road, but otherwise the splits are similar. The stolen bases are nice, but a 74% success rate is nothing special.
If Velez were still a middle infielder, I'd still rather have Kevin Frandsen. And I don't even like Frandsen.
Re: Youth Movement
What it comes down to, is that for me at least, having speedy middle infielders who don't hit for much pop is alright (so long as they can play some Defense). And he can improve his OBP. Jose Reyes had a career .338 obp in the minors and has improved vastly since reaching the majors. I'm not saying Velez can be Jose Reyes, but I think if he were still an infielder he could be a poor man's prototype of a Jose Reyes clone. Velez is actually slightly taller, but they're otherwise the same. Velez has that type of speed and he seems to be a bit of a late bloomer.
Also, on the Giants, 25 years old is extremely young.
It's all moot because he isn't gonna be a middle infielder anyway, which significantly lowers his intrigue and potential.
by nostocksjustbonds on Sep 4, 2007 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
So it took him a while to get it together. I'm excited about him nonetheless.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Sep 4, 2007 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Sep 4, 2007 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
My overall point is that I'm puzzled that people are still so enthusiastic about Velez even though his season was clearly a failure. When he put up that monster year in 2006, the general reaction was, Well, that's impressive, but he's going to have to do it at a higher level before we take him seriously. This year he got promoted to a higher level, and every aspect of his game took a hit. His batting average dropped by 20 points. His walk rate declined (slightly). His power disappeared completely. He went from being an outstanding base stealer to just another guy who runs a lot. And he got moved out of the middle infield.
And yet people seem to be even more excited about Velez than they were at this time last year. I don't get it.
IANAL
but talking in-depth about these guys really makes me depressed that there are really no non-OF position players. Goddamn Sabean.
Re: IANAL
by howtheyscored on Sep 4, 2007 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: IANAL
Re: Youth Movement
With the way the OF is beginning to shake out with all the prospects and with Velez's previous infield experience at SS would like to see SF revisit him as a 2b. Have a Ron Wotus or another coach work with him in fall and winter to improve his defense. If he is having problems with the backhand then hit an extra 200 balls to the backhand. Explain to the kid the quickest way to The Show is thru the infield.
Time for Erick Threets to step-up and prove he is a MLB pitcher. Would like to see him improve enough where he can be in the bullpen mix for 2008. If not teams might be willing to trade for a LHP who throws 95mph.
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Also, according to The Baseball Cube's stats, Velez had stopped being a regular SS by 2005 when he was still in the Jays organization.
Here's a quote from the Norwich Bulletin on the move:
If he's having trouble turning double plays in AA, it's only going to be worse in the majors.
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Changing Velez to another position permanently, while in the minors, is different. It wasn't done because CT needed help in the outfield, or their infield was overcrowded; it was specifically done because of concerns about his infield defense.
The organization is more likely to err on the side of overpraising rather than overcriticizing their players. If they say publically "we're just trying to get him more opportunities to use his speed", that may or may not be true. If they say "he's having trouble turning double plays", then it's much more likely to be the truth.
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
by E Ticket on Sep 5, 2007 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Agree
Very true, though I am hoping Lewis can be a regular. Time will tell. Same goes for Frandsen. I think he can play, but I am in a lonely minority. If Franny can play he would be the 2b unless Velez can beat him out.
It is my thought that Sabean will upgrade the OF this winter. I think Torii Huner would be an excellent CF for SF. Read today he wants 5yrs/70M. He is 32 yrs old so that may be a year too many. Possibly Sabean can entice him with a 4yr/62M deal? This way you can have Roberts (who I believe would be difficult to trade this winter) play his best position, LF, against RHPs.
Re: Youth Movement
I'm not convinced he can succeed at 1B either, though. His power numbers are not great, certainly not what you'd want at that position. Hell, you could say that about the rest of the OF candidates also, Roberts, Winn, Ortmeier, Davis, Velez....That group would be lucky to hit 50HRs total.
Re: Youth Movement
Seriously? My mental scouting report on him reads something like "average range, nice arm, a little raw." Not sure where I got that, though. Do people think he's a bad outfielder?
Re: Youth Movement
by giantsrainman on Sep 4, 2007 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
by howtheyscored on Sep 4, 2007 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
Small...sample...size.
Unless you've see him play the OF in Fresno all year I don't think you can judge him defensively, good or bad.
by Mike Benjamin Hit King on Sep 4, 2007 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
Re: IHNJE, IJLS
Re: IHNJE, IJLS
anyway.
Re: IHNJE, IJLS
It's a higher level of code that the Brainiac Nazis at Dodger Dugout will never decipher.
Re: IHNJE, IJLS
by howtheyscored on Sep 4, 2007 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: IHNJE, IJLS
My bad.
by howtheyscored on Sep 4, 2007 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: IHNJE, IJLS
And who doesn't, really?
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: poontang?
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Sep 4, 2007 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions
potty training?
by nostocksjustbonds on Sep 4, 2007 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
At 2B, he could cheat to the backhand side usually, and rely on speed when goin toward his left.
So--call me Flannery analogy
NOT knoedler enabler
hey, that minor league split site is nice.
Schierholtz slugs 536, OPS 855 against lefties. So he doesn't have to platoon. Should just play RF all the time. High K rate but lots of HRs too against LHP.
Re: Youth Movement
As far as I know, Tim Flannery was never moved to the outfield even in the minors.
Re: Youth Movement
Remember, up until this year, no one thought Durham sucked.
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Ripe and delicious
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
Oh man, I'm so clever.
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
I thought so.
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
So no. Good luck with interests. Shifting, springing, vested, conditional, bleh.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Sep 4, 2007 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Youth Movement
Re: Youth Movement
You get more goose for your money this way
Re: Youth Movement
coming into the game to a chorus of 10,000 "honk honk honks" might not have been as awe-inspiring as "Hells Bells" or "Smoke on the Water", but it was pretty goddamm funny. Ah the good all days.

by 


















