minor lines, 8/8/07
AAA: Fresno defeated New Orleans 7-0
Fresno: LF Brian Horwitz: 2 for 4
Fresno: CF Fred Lewis: 2 for 3, HR, BB, GiDP
Fresno: P Matt Kinney: 2 for 3, SO
Fresno: RHP Matt Kinney: 6.1 IP, 6 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 3 K, 0 HR
Fresno: RHP Scott Munter: 1.2 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 1 K, 0 HR
Fresno: RHP Tyler Walker: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 0 K, 0 HR
Lewis connected for a HR in his first PCL game since late June. Also with two hits each were Horwitz and Kinney, raising their respective AVGs to .327 and .250.
Kinney, Munter and Walker combined for a shutout. Kinney lowered his ERA from 4.26, which was already the best ERA among the Grizzlies starters, to 4.06. Munter stranded two inherited runners. Walker's 12th appearance with the Grizzlies was the first time he had not allowed a hit.
AA: Connecticut defeat Akron 3-2 (13 innings)
Connecticut: RF John Bowker: 4 for 6
Connecticut: 2B Julio Cordido: 3 for 6
Connecticut: RHP Brooks McNiven: 5.0 IP, 7 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 1 BB, 3 K, 0 HR
Connecticut: RHP Justin Hedrick: 2.1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 1 K, 0 HR--1 PO
Connecticut: RHP Billy Sadler: 1.2 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 2 K, 0 HR
Connecticut: RHP Osiris Matos: 2.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K, 0 HR
Connecticut: RHP Kelvin Pichardo: 1.1 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 0 K, 0 HR
Connecticut: RHP Brian Anderson: 0.2 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 1 K, 0 HR
Akron: LHP Chuck Lofgren: 6.0 IP, 7 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 3 BB, 5 K, 0 HR--2 HB
Bowker and Cordido accounted for 7 of the Defenders' 13 hits. They raised their respective AVGs to .296 and .259.
McNiven's ERA rose just above 3.00. Five Defenders relievers, all of whom are arguably among the Giants top forty prospects, combined for eight shutout innings. Hedrick continues to walk a lot of batters, but it does not show up in his ERA it seems. Sadler made his third appearance since his demotion, and he has not allowed a run in that time. Matos saw his ERA dip below 3.00. Pichardo's strikeout rate has definitely dropped since his promotion nearly a month ago. Anderson picked up his 25th save. Lofgren, perhaps the Indians top prospect, has pitched better than his 4.22 ERA would indicate as he has struggled with runners in scoring position.
A+: San Jose lost to Stockton 6-2
San Jose: SS Brian Bocock: 1 for 4, HR, 2 SO
San Jose: 3B David Maroul: 1 for 3, HR, 2 SO
San Jose: LF Eddy Martinez-Esteve: 1 for 3, BB
Stockton: CF Jonathan Zeringue: 2 for 3, HR, 2B, HBP, SO
San Jose: LHP Paul Oseguera: 5.0+ IP, 7 H, 6 R, 5 ER, 2 BB, 5 K, 1 HR
Stockton: RHP Andrew Bailey: 7.0 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 7 K, 0 HR
Maorul and Bocock connected for their 20th and 4th HRs this year. In his second game with San Jose, EME reached base twice. Zerigue, who started the year with the D'backs' double-A affiliate before joining the A's high-A affiliate, had a big game as he continues to dominate the Cal League. The 24-year-old entered the night hitting .311/.385/.588 in 119 AB.
Oseguera's ERA rose to 3.23. He failed to retire any of the three batters he faced in the 6th inning. For the second straight night, the Giants were shut out by a Stockton starter. Bailey, who had a 2.02 ERA last summer in the NWL, lowered his ERA nearly a full run in his 7th Cal League start.
A-: Augusta lost to Lakewood 13-1
Augusta: 3B Ryan Rohlinger: 2 for 4
Augusta: LHP Benjamin Snyder: 4.0 IP, 7 H, 5 R, 3 ER, 0 BB, 3 K, 0 HR--1 E
Augusta: RHP Paul Lussier: 0.2 IP, 6 H, 3 R, 3 ER, 1 BB, 1 K, 0 HR--1 WP
Augusta: RHP Adam Ortiz-Jusino: 2.1 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 0 K, 0 HR
Augusta: RHP Craig Whitaker: 0.2 IP, 5 H, 5 R, 3 ER, 2 BB, 1 K, 0 HR
Rohlinger, who had two of the GreenJackets' six hits, raised his AVG to .241.
Snyder had seemed to be on a roll this summer, but now nearly a third of the earned runs he has allowed this season (10 of 31) have come in his last four starts, raising his ERA to 2.16. Lussier and Whitaker saw their ERAs rise to 4.50 and 6.75, respectively. Ortiz-Jusino had his longest appearance of the year. He retired seven of eight batters faced and stranded all three inherited runners.
ssA: Salem-Keizer defeated Boise 5-0
Salem-Keizer: 2B Brock Bond: 1 for 3, 2 BB, E
Salem-Keizer: 3B Andrew Davis: 3 for 4, 2B, BB
Salem-Keizer: RF Sean Van Elderen: 1 for 2, 2B, 3 BB
Salem-Keizer: SS Sharlon Schoop: 2 for 3, 2 2B, BB, IBB, SO
Salem-Keizer: RHP T.J. Brewer: 6.0 IP, 3 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 6 K, 0 HR--1 WP
Salem-Keizer: LHP Joe Paterson: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 2 K, 0 HR
Salem-Keizer: RHP Timothy Egart: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 3 K, 0 HR
Schoop had perhaps his best game as a Volcano. He doubled his doubles total, which is not a good thing this late in the season. Davis raised his AVG to .279. Bond continues to get on base at better than a .500 clip. Van Elderen had his 19th double. He also had three walks, which seems rather surprising for someone who entered the night with a BB/AB ratio below 5%.
Brewer had the best start of his pro career, including season highs in K and IP. He tied a season-low in hits allowed. In two perfect innings, Paterson and Egart struck out all but one of the batters they faced.
R: Giants defeated Padres 10-2
Scottsdale: SS Charlie Culberson: 2 for 5, 2B, SO, GiDP, E
Scottsdale: 2B Nick Noonan: 2 for 5, 2 2B
Scottsdale: 1B Andy D'alessio: 1 for 3, HR, BB
Scottsdale: 3B Angel Villalona: 0 for 4, SO
Scottsdale: RHP Lars Knepper: 5.0 IP, 4 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 4 K, 0 HR
Scottsdale: LHP Gregorio Geronimo: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 3 K, 0 HR
Two first round supplemental picks, Noonan and Culberson, were the only Scottsdale hitters with multiple hits, raising their respective AVGs to .304 and .259. Culberson committed his 12th error in 31 games. D'allesio, one of three Giants to go deep for a HR, raised his league-leading total to 10 HRs.
Knepper picked up his first win as he lowered his ERA to 2.12. The 20-year-old Geronimo had his best appearance of the year when he struck out the side in the 6th inning. He had allowed at least one baserunner in his previous ten appearances this year.
DSL: Giants lost to Royals 2-0 (7 innings)
(completed early due to rain)
Giants: CF Carlos Willoughby: 1 for 2
Giants: LHP Franklin Noel: 4.0 IP, 6 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 0 BB, 4 K, 0 HR
The 18-year-old Willoughby had the team's only hit, raising his AVG above .300. The 18-year-old Noel, making just his second start among 22 appearances, now has 42 H, 23 BB and 52 K in 48.0 IP with a 3.00 ERA.
And here is an updated version of my Future Forty, my take on the Giants top prospects:
- RF Nate Schierholtz
- 3B Angel Villalona
- RHP Henry Sosa
- RHP Timothy Alderson
- 2B Nicholas Noonan
- LHP Clayton Tanner
- SS Emmanuel Burriss
- LHP Patrick Misch
- RHP Brian Wilson
- LF John Bowker
- LF Eddy Martinez-Esteve
- CF Eugenio Velez
- LHP Benjamin Snyder
- RF Dan Ortmeier
- SS Sharlon Schoop
- SS Charles Culberson
- LF Benj Copeland
- C Jackson Williams
- RHP Billy Sadler
- SS Brian Bocock
- LHP Erick Threets
- RHP Osiris Matos
- 1B Travis Ishikawa
- CF Clay Timpner
- RF Brian Horwitz
- 2B Marcus Sanders
- CF Michael McBryde
- RHP Kelvin Pichardo
- RHP Justin Hedrick
- LHP Paul Oseguera
- RHP Merkin Valdez
- RHP Waldis Joaquin
- LHP Alexander Hinshaw
- LHP David Quinowski
- RHP Brian Anderson
- RHP Taylor Wilding
- RHP Kevin Pucetas
- RHP Chris Begg
- C Pablo Sandoval
- OF Angel Joseph
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
random notes/observations:
- i feel bad for fred lewis
- craig whitaker is looking more and more like a busted first round draft pick
- will they keep noonan in rookie ball all year or will they give him a late promotion??
by z4 landshark @ McCovey Chronicles on Aug 8, 2007 11:13 PM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Yeah, it was really fair to send Freddie down, but I suspect that's the last time he'll be there.
I do the daily Villalona scroll
Succumb to the Enchanted t-shirt! Adopted dad of Minor Izzy
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I'm calling BS
There are several hitting prospects with upside in that list, but where I think you really miss the mark is on the pitchers. A couple promising arms? Many systems would kill for the young pitching depth that we have, not including the recent spate of graduates, that would seem to indicate pretty good handling of said prospects as well.
Succumb to the Enchanted t-shirt! Adopted dad of Minor Izzy
No, he's not all that pessimistic
by awesomer @ McCovey Chronicles on Aug 9, 2007 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: No, he's not all that pessimistic
I do think that this is about the weakest this farm system has ever been in starting pitcher candidates this decade, although maybe that looks better once Bumgarner signs. How many pitchers on this list have a good chance to be more than a #4 starter? I think you could make a decent argument that Sosa is the only one.
Re: No, he's not all that pessimistic
In fact, for all the negative talk of the Giants farm system, that is a rather impressive collection of arms to all come up in the same relative time frame.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I think I'm comfortable with where I have Copeland and Sandoval. But I kinda wish I had moved Ortmeier lower by several spots, and that would move Copeland up one spot.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Whitaker is about 4 years older and has a laundry list of injuries. At this point I would say Valdez has a better chance of reaching his potential simply because he has more time to do so.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
The rest of the list is pretty on with my thoughts. This is probably a good time to thank you again for doing these daily reports.
by Birdman @ McCovey Chronicles on Aug 9, 2007 12:09 AM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by Birdman @ McCovey Chronicles on Aug 9, 2007 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
That said, it's not like I am that big of a fan of the ten names I listed ahead of him, so I would have little issue with ranking him ten spots higher.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
But to me, the big argument for moving him up the list is his move back to catcher, a position which is absolutely the least stocked in baseball at both the major and minor league levels. I would guess the majority (and maybe the vast majority) of organizations don't have anybody above a C or C- level prospect at catcher. So IF Sandoval can stick there and IF (as he was once rumored to be) his D is above average at the position, then we have to look at his offensive contribution through that lens. The Giants originally moved him off Catcher because they hoped it would unleash his offensive potential. That experiment clearly failed. But perhaps returning him to the position he's comfortable with will provide happier returns.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by April3rdLifeBegins on Aug 9, 2007 12:14 AM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
What do you Think of Andy Delasso. The guy is tearing teh cover off the ball in AZL with 10 jacks. Will he be in Augusta next year, maybe San Jose?
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I'd have a very hard time ranking a college player in the AZL who was not drafted in the first five rounds in my top 40 list at this juncture. I'm sticking with my rule of thumb: If you're old enough to drink, your AZL stats are meaningless.
I would be surprised if D'alessio is in San Jose next year. It would seem to me that Brett Pill has done more to earn that spot. Arguably, Chad Rothford has outperformed D'alessio too.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Lewis' HR was an inside the park job. Hit it to left center and the outfielder dove, missed, and the ball kicked. He scored easilly, cruising across the plate standing up. I think he played last night also, but looked a lot more intense and into the game today.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I will say that he is the player that shocks me most having not been moved up.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by nostocksjustbonds on Aug 9, 2007 1:35 AM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I would say something similar about Ishikawa. I asked myself if I thought his ceiling had gone down. I don't think so, although his odds of reaching that ceiling have decreased. So I left him ranked ahead of guys whose ceiling I perceive to be bench players.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by nostocksjustbonds on Aug 9, 2007 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
But I do have one question: what in your mind creates the great disparity between Burriss and Bocock? Both are reputed to be great playmakers with the glove and have a lot of work to be done to make them offensively viable.
On the season, here are their cumulative numbers:
Burriss .265/.325/.308
Bocock .255/.322/.363
Pretty similar and that's with, at this point, Bocock having spent about 2/3 of the season at the higher level and Burris 2/3 at the lower level. Burriss is about to reach 60 SB for the season, but Bocock has a considerable (relatively speaking) more pop, with 35 XBH on the season.
What is separating these two for you enough to put one at 7 and one at 20?
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
You make a good argument about Burriss vs Bocock. Maybe I am just a Burriss apologist, but I am pretty much giving him a pass for his horrible first six weeks of the season. Burriss is among the league leaders in AVG in a pitcher-friendly park in a pitcher-friendly league.
Bocock has shown more pop. He has also shown a lot more strikeouts. I could be wrong, but my feeling is that the holes in his approach are likely to get exploited at the next level. Arguably, they are already exploited at this level.
Re: Where's Cowart?
for that matter..
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Aug 9, 2007 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Here's another question along the lines of Roger's Burriss/Bocock comparison: what separates Nate Schierholtz and Pat Misch? To my eye, their reasonable ceilings are pretty comparable (Noah Lowry or Jamie Moyer for Misch, Garret Anderson or Geoff Jenkins for Schierholtz). Schierholtz is younger, but he also has further to go. Each has had a breakthrough year at AAA, and each has performed very well in a brief big-league callup. I just wonder whether we've underrated Misch (as we underrated Lowry) because he doesn't have one particular flashy talent.
Also, I'm suprised not to see Jesse English on the list. What do we make of him at this point? He's been around forever, but has thrown fewer than 170 innings as a pro. On the other hand, he's still 22, and has been a strikeout machine at every step.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
(Some may remember an old conversation between various Giants bloggers heading in the 2005 season comparing Misch and Hennessey. Without looking it up, my recollection is that I was the primary apologist for why Hennessey was the better prospect. I think I looked pretty good on that score until this year, but maybe the others will look better from 2008 onward.)
I thought about Jesse English. Ultimately I decided that one great month in the NWL was not enough to make up for multiple years of reports about questionable makeup. If he keeps it up, maybe two greats months in the NWL will make me feel differently.
Incidentally, I am planning to take in a couple Volcanoes games before the end of the season, so maybe I will get to see him in person. I thought about going up there in mid-July, but there are so few prospects on the team this year, that it just didn't quite seem worth it.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by AngelintheInfield on Aug 9, 2007 8:18 AM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Aug 9, 2007 10:10 AM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I would push up Timp and Horwitz, who aren't that old and have succeeded in Fresno, over Bowker, Ort, and Ishi. The low level flame throwers are still our only strength. We'll know more about Sandoval later, but his hitting keeps improving.
prospecthound sometimes runs separate pitchers and hitters lists. If we listed only power hitters--those likely to ever hit, say, 25 HR in a year--it would be sparse. AngelV is a big maybe; Nate would have to develop more power; then Copeland has potential, and we'd be lookin at Rothford and Fairly.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Aug 9, 2007 4:12 PM PDT reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
You appear to be among those quite skeptical of Culberson and Williams. I think they have chances to be everyday players. Matos, Pichardo, Wilding and maybe Joaquin too are relievers at best.
I thought I was one of the bigger McBryde fans in this forum, but he seems to lack any real approach to hitting yet.
I can't see rating LaTorre, Holm or Buller ahead of Williams. I think a lot of people are focusing upon what he is not in their mind, i.e., worthy of a first round pick. He's still worth an early round pick, right? That puts him ahead of most of the others catchers you mention I should think.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
That's why I prefer reading your stuff over BP's rankings. :)
by BruteSentiment on Aug 9, 2007 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Yet he is second on a good team with 5 HR, and T-13th in the league.
Even with a .233 average, that's not light hitting, IMO. It's possible what few scouting reports we saw (ones from BA were put together obviously hastily and after the fact) were wrong.
by BruteSentiment on Aug 10, 2007 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Of course, a similar comparison can't be made on Williams until we see what he does in full season ball.
I don't like to make too many judgments on hitters in their first couple of months of full-season ball, because of the rather significant differences between playing college ball and pro ball (the increased schedule, the heavier wood bats, etc.).
Obviously, that is something Sandoval didn't have to go through.
What worries me more is Williams' defensive lapses, although he has seemingly gotten better in the past few weeks.
by BruteSentiment on Aug 10, 2007 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
Do you think, essentially, Blackely, Palmer, Kinney have no value? won't see the bigs in a Giants uniform?
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
It might make sense to call up Kinney for a spot start this month, presuming the Giants have an open spot on their 40-man roster. When you send Kinney back to the minors, who cares if you lose him on waivers? He was going to be a minor league free agent at the end of the season anyway.
Re: minor lines, 8/8/07
I have to say I'm liking Timpner better than in the past -- previously, I thought his upside was 4th outfielder and it would take a turn-around at the plate to do that -- plus I really haven't paid attention enough to notice him going from the low .300s to mid .300s
now that he is top 5 in the league in avg after most of the season and was again mentioned as a better defensive player, I'm thinking his upside has to be 3rd outfielder
... and rank him in the low 20s
For an organization known for pitching

by 





















