McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Guest Blogger: Juco All-American Answers Five Questions

Tradin': Matt Morris

Matt Morris is an average pitcher. I don't have any delusions that he really is the missing piece to some championship puzzle and that the Giants should be compensated accordingly. In a just world, the Giants wouldn't expect a bounty for an average pitcher who was owed $9M for the following season.

But consider the pitchers who are coming up in trade rumors:

Jason Jennings
Kyle Lohse
Jose Contreras
Shawn Chacon
Joe Kennedy
Maybe Dontrelle Willis or another pitcher under contract for '08 will be moved, but that would still leave slim pickings. If the pitchers on the market are bad and expensive Michael Bay movies, at least the Giants are peddling The Rock.

Morris's contract should actually help his value. The free-agent market for starting pitchers is Carlos Zambrano and the usual mish-mash of soon-to-be-overpaid mediocrity and sub-mediocrity. Teams with a possible opening in the 2008 rotation can look at Morris as someone who can help prevent them from spending $30M on Kyle Lohse or $50M on Jason Jennings. Nine million and one year for Morris or $8M and four years for Livan Hernandez?

The number of possible suitors is also in the Giants' favor. There are 13 teams within five games of a playoff spot, and just about every one of them need a starter. Boston is still starting Julian Tavarez. The Tigers have an offensive beast of a team, but Mike Maroth is still going out every fifth day. Every starter past the Mariners' top three has been abysmal. Only the Cubs are currently getting production from all five slots in their rotation.

That's about 300 words to get to this point: It isn't unreasonable to hope the Giants are able to trade Morris for a player who will be starting for them in 2008. I still have my Asdrubal Cabrera hopes. He's a defensively gifted shortstop who's hitting in the Eastern League. He's walking more than he's striking out, stealing bases, and he's hitting for a little power. He's only 21 and he's blocked in the Indians organization by Jhonny Peralta. Want.

The problem is that the Indians are a smart organization. They might want Matt Morris, but not enough to give up a top young player. That description also fits with the Braves, Red Sox, Tigers, Padres, and Diamondbacks. What the Giants need is a team that's contending, but also run by a GM of questionable competence. A GM who has made curious move after curious move, attends the Church of the Veteran every week, and has young players the Giants could use....

Here. The Mariners are three games back of the Angels, and I'm not quite sure how. If you go by runs scored/runs allowed, they aren't that much better than the Giants; the offense is a bit better, the starting rotation a bit worse. And though it's a little presumptuous for some dink like me to call a GM  incompetent, Bavasi certainly doesn't have the confidence of the Mariner bloggers. In fact, here is the U.S.S. Mariner explicitly asking Bavasi not to trade for Matt Morris. Don't listen to their lies, Bill! Look at the sparkly ERA! Sparkly sparkly!

Point is, I'd love to take Wladimir Balentien off the Mariners' hands. They already have Ichiro. They can keep their prize prospect, Adam Jones. Everyone wins. Except the Mariners. But that's not the point.

Comment starter: With the help of Brute Sentiment's thorough diary, try and come up with your own Matt Morris pipe dreams. I really do think he's going to Seattle, though it's probably not realistic to hope for Balentien or Jeff Clement. A fella can dream, though....

0 recs  |  Comment 81 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
MORRIS AND FELIZ AND LOWRY FOR CABRERA!

Or are we not doing that anymore =(

I'm always thinking one step ahead, like a carpenter that builds stairs.

by sam urai on Jul 17, 2007 1:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
"It isn't unreasonable to hope the Giants are able to trade Morris for a player who will be starting for them in 2008."

I like that quote. This deadline is bringing me back to the idea Sabean tried to sell us in the past...the price of doing business. It certainly isn't unreasonable to demand an average starting caliber player back for our average starting caliber player. A player maybe not quite ready for the bigs should project better than average. As for my trade idea:

Morris + Winn(or Durham if they prefer, or any other vet really) to Mets for Carlos Gomez and another body. They do have Milledge and yet another stud OF(Martinez?) on the way in a couple years. NYM have scouted Winn and Minaya is on record saying he wont trade Milledge/Gomez for rentals. Well, here you go Omar, two non-rentals.

Gomez looks potentially like a faster Alex Rios, which is scary. Potential being the key word. Giving up known quantities for potential is a dangerous game, so the prospect we get should be as good or better than anyone we've given up since the Schmidt trade--since Morris is better than anyone we've acquired at the deadline recently. And we have moved some pretty valuable prospects. BTW, who was Pirates GM in 2001. And who is he working for--we should call them first.

Uribe to Thompson to Clark... never forget.

by Birdman on Jul 17, 2007 2:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Gomez has been described in some circles as being "Jose Reyes"-like, so I don't see the Mets trading him.  Then again, this is the same GM who traded Kazmir away and Kazmir was golden by all considerations.

Pirates GM in 2001 is Littlefield and he's still there.  There has been speculation here for a while that he won't deal with Sabean anymore after that trade.

FYI, Winn has a no-trade clause.  However, Durham would be a great addition to the deal, they have Valentin playing 2B there.

I only know this much about the Mets and Gomez because I almost got Gomez (sob...) for Marcus Giles in a league I'm in but blew it....

"I'm a Giant now" - Wendell Fairley "I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 17, 2007 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Durham to the Mets makes a lot of sense.

Milledge, Gomez, Martinez . . . the Mets may have so many outfield prospects that they may start undervaluing them. They can't all play, after all. I'd be happy with any of those guys.

by Evan on Jul 17, 2007 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh, try again
Jim Duquette traded Kazmir for Zambrano, not Omar Minaya. Also, Matt Morris last I checked is not Latino, so not sure why the Mets would be interested in him.

by awesomer on Jul 17, 2007 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Eh, try again
Right now, Minaya has a thing for power arms.  Unfortunately, Morris is not one of those.
Brian Anderson: generic name, unique talent.

by Anticon23 on Jul 17, 2007 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Eh, try again
Thanks, I thought it was Minaya who did that bonehead move.  Where is Duquette today?  Maybe we can fleece that club?
"I'm a Giant now" - Wendell Fairley "I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 17, 2007 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I also like the idea of Morris to LAA for SS Erick Aybar.
Uribe to Thompson to Clark... never forget.

by Birdman on Jul 17, 2007 2:20 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Clement...
is a fine prospect and would immediately rise to the   top of the Giants system; however, he has some question marks.   Essentially the scouting reports on him are not very positive
Flossing a dead horse

by kenshin1 on Jul 17, 2007 2:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I forgot to include my main point.....
Clement might be more available than we think.
Flossing a dead horse

by kenshin1 on Jul 17, 2007 2:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
First the buyers guide now this? Some excellent stuff going on around these parts. I tip my hat. Solid, very solid.

"Everyone wins. Except the Mariners. But that's not the point."

That's a full out belly laugh. :)

by Armz Dealer on Jul 17, 2007 2:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
The tigers traded Mike Maroth to the Cards and replaced him in the rotation with Andrew Miller, who is sadly young and awesome.

by Thompson on Jul 17, 2007 6:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
However, Maroth's description stills fits his new team, the Cardinals.
Your 2012 NL ERA champion: Sergio Romo

by Lyle on Jul 17, 2007 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Hi everyone, I'm new to the sight but I love it.  Keep up the good work.

As I posted in the previous thread, seems to me that the Giants can go to ways...the first would be to rebuild methodically by dealing Morris and other vets for the second rate prospects and low ceiling major league talent they would likely bring back, and wait for the draft to bear fruit in '10 and beyond...

Or take a higher risk faster approach.  Deal Cain or Lincecum for young major league ready talent with controlable contracts at multiple positions.  If Sabean could leverage either Cain or Lincecum into a significant upgrade at at least 2 positions for the foreseable future, that should be considered.  

one of the lunatics.

by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 6:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
TLF? Tender Loving... "Fun"?
Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
My guess is "The Lunatic Fringe."
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Wow, my realistic guess would have been name initials, but I think you've probably got it with that one.

Its just too much of a coincidence not to be right.

Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Correct!  But based on the first guess I'm rethinking!  Should have made it less ambiguious!
one of the lunatics.

by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Actually, I think The Lunatic Fringe is the most obvious answer. Just because I'm too thick to see it doesn't mean it's not clear.
Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
If Sabean doesn't make one positive move to get younger by the end of the trade deadline, then I think we'll have to kidnap him and hold him hostage somewhere until the Giants forget that he even existed.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/t/torresa01.shtml

by Tajiri on Jul 17, 2007 6:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Ok, I don't want to rag on anyones point, since I myself am a new member... but if Sabean trades Cain or Lincecum for anyone, I don't care if we get 8 prospects back, my head will explode. Not like its isn't close already, but I couldn't take that. You cant trade away arguably two of the five best young pitchers in the league. I threw up just thinking about it.
Lets just bring up the AZL Giants. All of them.

by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 7:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
On a second note, I think that we might be able to pry L Millz (His rap monaker) away from the Mets for Morris and Winn, especially if Pedro comes back and just gets lit up (please).
Lets just bring up the AZL Giants. All of them.

by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I intentionally didnt say "prospects" for that very reason.  I would agree that you can't trade Cain of Lincecum for anyone that merely has the "potential" to be good.  You would have to get back at least 2 young positions players with controlable contracts, that are already productive at the major league level, and would represent a significant upgrade at both spots for the foreseeable future.  
one of the lunatics.

by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
That is even a bad idea. Pitching, especially young, sneaky, fireball throwing 21 year old pitching is almost impossible to come by now-a-days. That is pretty evident in the fact that we even think the G-Men can get anything of relative value for Morris. We need to hold on to these two guys, who are pretty secure in the orange and black duds for the next few years. Trading them (or one of them) away for someone who is a proven position player sounds alot to me like trading Liriano, Boofster, and Joe Nathan to the Twins for "proven" A.J. Pierzynski.

We all know how that one worked out.

There is no need to continue to trade away our young core players, especially since we wont get anything even remotely close in value to the unbridled potential of Lincecum and Cain. The only players I'd even consider would be someone like Utley or Cabrera, and that aint happening.

Like it or not, this team will have us banging our heads against a table for a few years to come, but it will at least seem manageable with Cain and Lincecum pwning batters. Lets stick with the Schierholtzes and Ortmiers and Lewises for a bit, we've got nothing to lose now.

Lets just bring up the AZL Giants. All of them.

by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
You really think Matt Cain is more valuable than two good young position players?

by Evan on Jul 17, 2007 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I didn't say that. But there isn't a team out there that would trade two (good enough) young position players for Matt Cain. He's worth more to the Giants than any realistic combo of players.
Lets just bring up the AZL Giants. All of them.

by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
For me the point is this.  As the team is currently constructed we can't win with Cain, as evidenced by his 3-9 record.  If we rebuild through the draft by the time we would be in a position to win with Cain, he will be at or near free agency, in which case it would cost us 15-25 million p/yr to keep him, a price tag we probably can't aford.

As a hypothetical, the Phillies need pitching and are built to win now.  Cain packaged with either Durham/Klesko/Aurillia/Wynn for 2 of the following 3 Howard/Utley/Victorino ?  Maybe that it is fanciful speculation, but that is the kind of return that would be neccessary to consider dealing Cain or Lincecum.

one of the lunatics.

by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I totally understand your point, but that is fanciful speculation. Utley is one of the best players in the NL, same with Howard. There is no way either of them go. If we got them, I'd consider it, but I still don't know.

Magowan and Behr have much more money to burn than they lead on, they just dont want you knowing it. They wont let Cain get away.

Lets just bring up the AZL Giants. All of them.

by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Before coming to the Giants, Edgardo Alfonzo was a .300 hitter, with a few 20 homer seasons under his belt.  Before coming here, AJ Pierzynski was a .301 career hitter, with developing power.  Before coming to the Giants, Shea Hillenbrand could hit .300 with a little pop.

Let's not go throwing away our best pitchers to grab ourselves some hitters who might not hit when they arrive at AT&T Park.  And Ryan Howard's a lefty hitter who's currently batting .250 on the season.  Lefty hitter + McCovey Cove typically = loss of power and decline in BA.  Not saying it WILL happen to Howard, I'm just saying Matt Cain MIGHT still be more valuable to the Giants in the long run.

by JRPhillips on Jul 17, 2007 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
While I think Nate will make it and Freddie could if he can play well enough defensively to play center, I think an outfield of Nate, Freddie and Dan Ortmeier would be decidedly below average.

by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
That's basically what I'm saying. In addition to head exploding, I might set fire to myself and everything around me.
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
whats wrong with the Rock?
I adopted Barry Bonds

by BondsApologist on Jul 17, 2007 7:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Not a G-D thing!
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
It implies that habeas corpus is something Sean Connery is entitled too, and that's a little 'quaint' for 2007

by mjrboredom on Jul 17, 2007 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Every time I hear about Tony Womack I think of that movie. That and the wonderful quote, "I'd take pleasure in gutting you boy!"
I live life like every week is shark week. Oh and ignore the spelling. I do.....

by someguynamedg on Jul 17, 2007 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
"Stand down Captain!"

That movie has many memorable quotes.

by mxmob33 on Jul 17, 2007 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
g, that's the line my wife's favorite; she thinks it's hilarious.
Your 2012 NL ERA champion: Sergio Romo

by Lyle on Jul 17, 2007 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
...er, that line IS...
Your 2012 NL ERA champion: Sergio Romo

by Lyle on Jul 17, 2007 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
What the Giants need is a team that's contending, but also run by a GM of questionable competence. A GM who has made curious move after curious move, attends the Church of the Veteran every week, and has young players the Giants could use....

I don't know if there's a fit, but damned if you didn't just describe Ned Coletti to a T.

"Robb Nen is going to get you" - Benito Santiago to Chipper Jones, 10/7/02

by Pants Man on Jul 17, 2007 7:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Also, Matt Millen. I wouldn't put it past Sabean to unload Morris for some of the Lions' draft picks.
Lon Simmons' adopted dad.

by Kitspool on Jul 17, 2007 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
The hope that Matt Morris is going to bring back a top notch prospect is fool's gold. It just isn't going to happen. That winodw of opportunity closed about a month ago when he started pitching more to what his peripherals indicated that he should. In order for the Giants to get a top notch prospect, they would have to probably eat most of that contract, and even so, still might not get a real blue chipper.

If the Giants really want to get a much better prospect, they really ought to be thinking about dealing Noah Lowry. He's young, left-handed and signed to a reasonable contract for a few more years. That's the guy they should cash in and do it now before he blows up also.

Why isn't Sabean held accountable for leading the Giants into many years of mediocrity???

by oldrips on Jul 17, 2007 8:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I like the name Asdrupal ... I think it was one of Hannibal's generals.

by zenbitz on Jul 17, 2007 9:05 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Actually it was the Aztec god of whup-ass.
Friend to the aardvark community.

by leewhee on Jul 17, 2007 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I guess the main question for me is do you trade for best available talent or for need. I'm just looking at the big, black hope that is the left side of the Giants' infield in 2008. So I'm thinking best available shortstop prospect is on the top of the list.

So what Correia's value about now? How about selling him as the next Accardo - before that ERA reaches 6.00.

by RUSirius on Jul 17, 2007 9:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
That would be a big, black HOLE. Or if you're an optimist it could be a big, black hope. But I'm thinking optimism is running a bit dry around these parts, so maybe not.

by RUSirius on Jul 17, 2007 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Assuming Cain and Lincecum continue to develop, and barring injury, the Giants should be able to at least keep 40%+ of their games close into the 6-7th inning.

So there's no way you give up a guy who has the ability to keep you in just about every game he pitches.

The problem, of course, is run production. This year, the Giants have scored 3 runs or fewer in 44 of 90 games (regulation 9 inn.)

So in half the games, the Giants pitching staff would have to give up 2 or fewer runs per 9 innings in order to win. That means the staff would need to post an ERA under 2.00 to win any of half the games.

The Giants run total this year doesn't look as anemic as it really is, thanks to a few blowout wins (13-0, etc). But when you look at the median # of runs per game, it's pathetic.

I say keep the arms and work on trying to find a group that can at least scratch out 4 runs a game one way or the other.

Friend to the aardvark community.

by leewhee on Jul 17, 2007 9:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Damn Delusional Yankees
Guys, I have brought this up a couple times.  I really really really want to trade Morris and Hennesy to the Yankees for Abreu and change.  The Yankees have little faith in Abreu.  One of the guys on my baseball team the other day summed up Yankee fans distaste for him by saying, "I don't trust him."

Well, I do.  He's almost a five-tool player.  And we have amillion Venezuelans on our team, so he should be thrilled at joining his countrymen on the Gyros.

I think the Yankees would take the bait, too.  Both Henny and Morris are better starters than most of their staff.   The Yankees are also delusional and think they have a chance at making a play-off push.  Landing Abreu is my pipe dream... but I have been holding on to itmuch too long for it to become a reality.

If Brad Hennesy had Steve Kline's attitude you'd get Rob Nen... without the triple digit heat.

by milesntrane on Jul 17, 2007 9:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
That would be a good trade in the sense that Abreu is a better player than Morris. But so what? What does he do for us? He's 33 and his game has already dropped off sharply, so he's not going to be a key part of the next good Giants team. Would't you rather give his at-bats to Lewis and Schierholtz?

by Evan on Jul 17, 2007 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
Abreu seems like a logical Sabean move, which is precisely why I wouldn't want him. I like his OBP (although all his offensive numbers are down this year), but he's old and definitely on the downside of his career. No thanks.
Billy Hayes: Nine more big-league plate appearances than you.

by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
Abreu is a player with declining skills and a bloated contract. On the other hand, so is Morris. Hennessey is a non-entity as far as trade value is concerned.

Gee, an aging player with declining skills......just the type of guy that Sabean loves. What I don't get is why hasn't Sabean brought in Julio Franco yet?

Why isn't Sabean held accountable for leading the Giants into many years of mediocrity???

by oldrips on Jul 17, 2007 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
I'm not saying he did roids but wasn't he one of those guys that had a huge drop off after MLB started testing? Ala Brett Boone/Brian Giles
"I'd take pleasure in gutting you boy" Oh and ignore the spelling. I do.....

by someguynamedg on Jul 17, 2007 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kendall and Beane
Does anyone have any thoughts on the Jason Kendall trade yesterday?  I thought it was yet another example of Billy Beane's saviness in recognizing the positives of an otherwise undesirable situation.  He is 10+ games back at the halfway point and probably out of it.  There is still half the season left and of course "anything can happen" but Beane must have decided that it was also time to be reaistic and look for good, pragmatic deals that could be done with any team itching to stay in the hunt.  Sound basis in reality? Why does this concept seem so foreign??

by Dutchfury on Jul 17, 2007 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
Yep, that's a bold (and smart and prescient) move by Beane, made possible by the fact that the A's have Kurt Suzuki in AA. The Giants have sweet fuck-all in the way of poz players in the system.
Billy Hayes: Nine more big-league plate appearances than you.

by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
Suzuki's been up with the big club for a few weeks now and I predict he'll get the majority of starts at catcher. Unless they're serious about starting Piazza at catcher. If so, you'll have to pull me off the floor where I am ROFL.
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
Ahh, didn't realize Suzuki was already up. Nice.
Billy Hayes: Nine more big-league plate appearances than you.

by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
My thought was, I wish Beane were our GM.  His team is 5 games under .500, and he is pulling the trigger on a deal with a view toward the future that won't kill the team now.  Suzuki will get to learn at the MLB level and maybe they get something back.  But there is no reason to keep putting Kendall out there every day.  Sabes, hello, this is how you rebuild or retool or whatever it is you need to do.  Winn and/or Roberts should be gone so we can see if any of the guys (Lewis, Schierholtz, Ortmeier can be useful 3rd 4th or 5th outfielders.)  

by out machine on Jul 17, 2007 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
Kendall was one of the worst positional players in baseball this year with his 530 OPS. It's not that Beane wanted to get younger, he just wanted to get rid of Kendall's 13 million dollar salary and his unproductivity.

by giants92388 on Jul 17, 2007 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
With those numbers, it's shocking Kendall's not wearing the Black and Orange right now.
Billy Hayes: Nine more big-league plate appearances than you.

by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
I completely agree with you.  Beane just wanted to dump salary and he found a team that was in need of a catcher.  We probably wont trade Morris, Winn or Lowry until this winter.  

by SabeanSupporter on Jul 17, 2007 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
If that's true, then we really have no hope for the future.
Why isn't Sabean held accountable for leading the Giants into many years of mediocrity???

by oldrips on Jul 17, 2007 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Kendall and Beane
The Giants HAVE almost no hope for the short-term future IMO.  I have felt since last winter that it almost certainly would be next decade before they could be likely to contend again.

by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Talking about the winter
Does anybody have a handle on possible SF prospects that need to be protected and placed on the 40 man roster this winter?

Believe in the last CBA there were changes made to add an additional year before prospects had to be protected but was wondering what SF prospects needed to be considered for protection or otherwise exposed to the Rule 5 draft.

by wilriv21 on Jul 17, 2007 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Talking about the winter
Good question.  I would presume it would be players from the 2003 or 2004 draft, neither of which was particularly good.

The Giants biggest problem isn't protecting its good, young prospects, it's developing them in the first place.

by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I'm glad someone brought up the Kendall trade. Is anyone else shocked that Beane started rebuilding before Sabean?

The Giants aren't going to get anything of worth for their players. The trade market seems to have change dramatically in the last few years. It seems that teams just want to hold on to their better prospects. After last years spending spree, you can't blame them. Teams simply cannot do business paying average to above average players the kind of money that was being thrown around. That Marlins owner knew that, and that's why he flipped out over the Ichiro deal. Didn't we already go through this with the A-rod contract in Texas? And the Mike Hampton contract in Colorado? And now the Zito contract? Ugh.

The only way out of this mess is to start drafting legitimate talent. If they can't get legitimate prospects for Morris (and I don't think they can) I would just keep him. I don't expect the true rebuilding to start until Sabean is gone.

by smedley on Jul 17, 2007 1:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But is the trading of Kendall a rebuild?
They got rid of the bum. He is in the last year of a god awful contract. They have Suzuki to replace him and Piazza can also catch some. Now only if we can dump some salary and free it up for the upcoming years.

by wilriv21 on Jul 17, 2007 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I actually don't think that this has to do with the A's rebuilding. Kendall is having a terrible year (.260 OBP!, .542 OPS!) and he's getting paid too much for the A's to keep letting him do it. Suzuki has a good chance to put up numbers that are at least as good and if Piazza is available at all his bat will likely be a plus from behind the plate.

But this move almost definitely makes the A's a better team as of today, so I don't think it's a rebuild move. The fact that it is good for the future is just a plus for them.

Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Kendall is worthless as a hitter but good defensively.  In this day and age if you're worthless as a hitter than you are worthless period, so yeah I agree that dumping Kendall is like dumping a bum.  But it just seems to me like Beane sold the dream.  He sold the dream that Kendall could be good and to the best possible place you could sell that dream: a team in need of a catcher that is still in the hunt.  In return he gets a 6'6'' relief prospect with high potential to be a big leaguer.  He gets to start a catcher and potentially develop a big leaguer with that.  And even if he is just unloading trash isn't that the first step in rebuilding?

by Dutchfury on Jul 17, 2007 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I agree.  Two things can be equally true.  Getting a low value player out of the way often is a rebuilding mode.  How can you say it is not re-building to give the position to a 23 year old player?

by out machine on Jul 17, 2007 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Re-building and cutting one's losses are two different things sometimes.  I think this is more like one of them.  By dealing Kendall, they've saved (I would imagine) at least 25% of that $13M.  In Billy Beane's terms, $4M+ is a lot of money.

Re-building often entails more than one move.  Like howtheyscored, I don't think this is really a rebuilding move.

by sfgfan on Jul 17, 2007 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Maybe rebuild is not the right word.  I think the A's are usually in a better position to change without having to truly rebuild because they seem to have a fully stocked pipeline of young players.  They are competitive from year to year and you don't really notice a full scale turnover.  Whatever it is called, it is a great move by Beane.

by out machine on Jul 17, 2007 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see Kendall's defense hyped so much
Can anyone show me anything to back that up? I can show you his abysmal 29% career throwout stealing rate, including an impressive 18% in 05 and 20% this year.

by awesomer on Jul 17, 2007 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: I see Kendall's defense hyped so much
One of the top 3 framers in the game (according to Krukow). That translates to about 1 additional win every 5.8 seasons.
Billy Hayes: Nine more big-league plate appearances than you.

by delorean on Jul 18, 2007 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Wow!  If the true rebuilding doesn't begin until Brian Sabean is gone, it will likely be well INTO the next decade before the Giants are likely to be competitive.

I DO think Brian will change his ways though.  With the drafting of Lincecum, the signing of Villanova and having six of the first 51 draft picks this year, he already HAS.

by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...
Ummm...

My client is available...

"Obviously, he hasn't watched Tom Emanski's "Defensive Drills". It's endorsed by Fred McGriff, you know."

by Glenallen Hill's Helmet on Jul 17, 2007 3:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sterling silver Necklace Tiffany Dreams
Geez, not even an "I hear Barry Bonds wears Sterling Silver Tiffany Necklaces!"? What's with spam bots these days...
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 18, 2007 12:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sterling silver Necklace Tiffany Dreams
And the quality of the writing is just abysmal.

I mean, seriously, how hard is it to scam some half decent college grammar geek into editing your spambot messages under what you liberally call an "internship."

Can't be that hard.

Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on Jul 18, 2007 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
Cause this is making the kind of sense that's...not

It's okay if you don't get that reference and you think I'm weird.  I think I'm weird too.

Steve Kline: He's pretty okay!

by groug on Jul 18, 2007 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
your logic does not resemble our earth logic.

by Roger on Jul 18, 2007 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
No, mine is much better
Steve Kline: He's pretty okay!

by groug on Jul 18, 2007 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
I almost went with: and in some language that's English?

by Roger on Jul 18, 2007 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!
Panda_bubble_small
First Baseman of the future
Timmy_avatar_small
Downloadable Game Broadcasts?
29x2_small
All-time favorite SF Giants: closer
Small
Would you trade Jeremy Affeldt?
Panda_bubble_small
Sabean putting alot of weight in Winter leagues?
Lincecum_small
Fourth Annual McCovey Awards Ceremony

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S