Post Title
My Employer Would Like To Make You An Offer
By A Shadowy CharacterJuly 11, 2007 | Issue 24

I'm glad you accepted our offer to meet. My employer could use...a man of your talents. Please, please have a seat. I apologize that my employer isn't able to be here in person, but you'd understand if you knew the circumstances. If everything goes well, you'll never meet him at all.
You attracted our attention with the work you did as a producer of the Major League Baseball All-Star Game for Fox. It should please you to know that you have all the leverage in the forthcoming negotiations; your work was that brilliant. I've never before seen such a display of style over substance. To be honest, I get bored watching baseball. I need other things to capture my interest. I'm glad you agree, and that's why I'm prepared to offer you eight times what you're currently making.
Now, please, let's continue this meeting in that large wooden crate over there. If you'll go first, I'll follow you in.
What? There's nothing unusual about a request to meet in a large, human-sized box with a padlock on the outside. My employer values his secrecy, and we've completed many of our transactions in such a box. It just makes sense.
Hmm. I can understand a little hesitation, but, really, there is nothing to fear. Is it the fact that the crate is addressed to Abu Dhabi? As if I'm going to seal the crate and ship it off to parts unknown in some Bugs Bunny-meets-Machiavelli scheme? I assure you, that simply isn't the case. Now get in the crate. Please.
Okay. We don't have to hold the meeting in the shipping crate addressed to Abu Dhabi, but I have to say your paranoia disappoints me. This is a friendly business meeting, not some clandestine back-alley coke deal.
I can almost understand your point of view. Hypothetically, and that's an important word to remember, if I were disgusted with an All-Star Game television producer, I suppose it would make me feel better to know he was locked in a crate and headed to the other side of the world against his or her wishes. If, say, I were indescribably offended that the call of the first inside-the-park home run in All-Star history was delayed by shots of some goofy player-reporter and his bulldog swimming around in the waters behind the actual game, I could see my having a desire for some variety of revenge.
So, I'll forget about the box for now.
Here, have a sip of this. What? Just water of course. Any other fragrance or scent you might detect is surely coincidental. I can understand your suspicion of the box, but are you really going to turn down a drink? I told you, my employer is a big fan of your work. Others might be upset that you interviewed the manager of the American League while Barry Bonds was up at the plate in his home park against one of the best pitchers in the game during what might be his last All-Star Game ever. That really didn't make a whole bunch of sense. But as I said, baseball bores me. I understand why you make those decisions. Baseball is just...so much pitching and hitting and pitching and blah blah blah.
You get it. You make sure that we don't have to suffer through too much of the baseball. So, you don't have to worry about me drugging you and shipping your body to Abu Dhabi. It just doesn't fit with what I've told you. Heck, I love that you don't trust your audience to enjoy the very thing that they've tuned in to watch. That takes guts.
Now, please, either get in the box or have a sip of this strangely warm liquid. And then we'll have our meeting. My employer could use...a man of your talents.
91 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: <b></b>
MORE CROWD REACTION SHOTS
crowd reaction shots
Affleck/Garner
Clemens news
three things.
Re: <b></b>
I can't believe they wouldn't at least let us enjoy the natural drama of Bonds' last at-bat.
Re: <b></b>
Re: <b></b>
re:
by projectmayhem713 on Jul 11, 2007 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: re:
by milesntrane on Jul 11, 2007 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: re:
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: &lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&
It is rare for a major-league player to be so unabashed in his love for his hometown team when he is not only on the roster of another team, but the roster of a division rival!
I have to say - I kinda like it.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 11, 2007 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Cammie's our man
Re: Cammie's our man
Re: Cammie's our man
If Eric Byrnes was really the player he's been hitting like this season, it wouldn't be a bad idea to sign him. But it's far more likely that as soon as he signed with the Giants, he would go back to being the Eric Byrnes of the rest of his career... a .268 hitter with a poor OBP and decent pop.
Re: Cammie's our man
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Jul 12, 2007 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Cammie's our man
Byrnes on the other hand has been fairly erratic. In addition to that inconsistency, his BA is no where near what Winn's was at the time of Winn's extension.
catnip and a flashlight
The problem, of course, is in the execution. Byrnes shouldn't be playing every day ahead of the kids.
Re: catnip and a flashlight
I also don't like the guy. At all. So I'm a little biased.
Re: catnip and a flashlight
For pure entertainment value, I'd rather have Burns over every one of our outfielders (cept BLB of course). Dude is a bat busting over the knee, helmet tossing, kinda guy...and I dig that because our team now looks like they're half asleep most of the time.
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions
R: catnip and a flashlight
PLUS
PLUS he's the Blanks' hottest hitter.
Any detraction from their offense is , well , a
PLUS
PLUS
PLUS
That may be all.
by victor frankenstein on Jul 11, 2007 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: <b></b>
Byrne's Best Friend
by VidaWantsYourCar on Jul 11, 2007 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Cammy VS Jeanne - who'se worse?
Re: <b></b>
Re: <b></b>
Re: <b></b>
Sweet
I think that's kinda sweet.
by leewhee on Jul 11, 2007 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Sweet
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Perspiring Minds Want To Know!
by victor frankenstein on Jul 11, 2007 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Perspiring Minds Want To Know!
Re: Fox's All-Star Game
Say, has anyone ever televised camel races? I think he could be your man.
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Jul 11, 2007 10:59 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Fox's All-Star Game
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Jul 11, 2007 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: <b></b>
Re: <b></b>
And why is it that baseball's biggest events are announced by the most retarded announcers, I'll never understand. I'd much prefer to listen to Vin Scully than Buck/McCarver. Neither one knows shit about what's happening and could care less, and it shows up in the broadcast.
And they really need to get rid of those stupid in-game interviews with the manager. that's really lame.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 11, 2007 11:37 AM PDT reply actions
Re: <b></b>
McCarver is unlistenable
Re: McCarver is unlistenable
Now, that could be an interesting point to talk about... how and why an injury can make David Ortiz alter his swing.
But does McCarver elaborate? No. He says, "It just does." and doesn't say anything else about it.
Re: McCarver is unlistenable
For the record, I'm not saying it was the least listenable, and I still managed to think he wasn't making a lot of sense (because it was actually a short hop, Tim, and the play wasn't very close to begin with), but it was easily the most notable CarverMoment of the night for me because it just went to show that even Tim realizes he doesn't know a thing about broadcasting or baseball.
It's like a bad lumberjack at a baby shower for his wife's distant friend who suddenly sees somebody else at the party examining a tree in the backyard. "Finally, something to talk about for the next 15 minutes!"
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: McCarver is unlistenable
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: McCarver is unlistenable
On Wednesdays I go shopping
e: On Wednesdays I go shopping
by victor frankenstein on Jul 11, 2007 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: McCarver is unlistenable
Now Poo-Holes is Pissed at Tony
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 11, 2007 11:40 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Now Poo-Holes is Pissed at Tony
by fanofvanlandingham on Jul 11, 2007 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Now Poo-Holes is Pissed at Tony
Pujos being in the game in either of those last two at bats would have had people (maybe not cynical people) talking about what a great game that was and how there might be hope yet for the ASG, but instead it's the same joke that it's been for years.
And there is only one guy to blame. I just can't believe that for once it's not Selig.
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Pujols as clubhouse cancer
Re: Pujols as clubhouse cancer
Twist our arm and we'll toss in a LHP who can serenade you while his guitar gently weeps.
Regards
Goofus McPenisbutter
Re: Pujols as clubhouse cancer
Gotta have an arm in the deal, after all. If I was the Cardinals, I'd take that deal in a second. Come on, 3 guys for one? And one of them pitches?! That's like 300% the manpower with 200% the skill set we're giving them.
It's practically a highway robbery.
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Pujols as clubhouse cancer
Re: Pujols as clubhouse cancer
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Your message here
Re: Your message here
by Grant Brisbee on Jul 11, 2007 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Your message here
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Your message here
Re: Your message here
While you're at it, pick up Download Statusbar, Google Toolbar, IE Tab, and StumbleUpon.
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Your message here
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Your message here
Re: <b></b>
It's especially jarring for me because I just spent the past two weeks in England, much of it enjoying the BBC's coverage of Wimbledon, and it's like night and day from the way Fox covers sports.
Sinking Yacht
Re: <b></b>
I've actually seen a U.S. broadcast recently where they threw it down to the field which entails someone with a mic in their hand standing on the sideline rambling on about something in full-screen mode, while LIVE PLAY is occurring directly behind them on the pitch.
This isn't the effing NFL you dolts!!! There's no timeouts, commercial breaks, or shit like that. Give me one camera mounted high @ midfield and maybe one behind each goal and I'm good to go. Oh and don't even get me started on that bitch Eric Wynalda and his misguided views.
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Brain Fart
"compare how we..."
Can't type or think for crap today.
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 11, 2007 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: <b></b>
Re:
Re:
I find him to be better pretty good. He doesn't talk to much, has good pipes and seems to not let the required distractions like promo reads and sponsored "features" take away from the game.
He might stike some as smug, but having seen him guest on talk shows, he strikes me as a guy with a good sense of humor and pretty self-effecing. I also really liked his "Slam-a-lama-ding-dong" comerical and the "good side" commercial with Leon.
His discussion of PEDs last night seemed pretty balanced and he didn't take cheap shots at Bonds.
Re:
Regarding the steroid discussion, was there any value in bringing it up? Is there any other sport that would take attention away from their all-star game to discuss steroids? I thought it was in pretty bad taste, but par for the course in MLB.
Re:
The problem with Buck for me is that hes remarkably dull. He speaks, regardless of play or atmosphere, in a ridiculous monotone - which is too bad because he dos have a voice suited for the job - and never gets excited about anything.
The problem with Buck for me is that he takes what should be memorable, high stakes, exciting games in any sport and he calls them in a way that would make the casual viewer think they were preseason laughers.
The problem with Buck for me is that while he'll make thousands of passable calls in his career, he'll never ever make a single great call and he's not likely to even make a memorable call if the game means something.
Watching the playoffs and the World Series it gets unbelievably frustrating to have to put up with his droll, stagnant style.
If he ever brought any enthusiasm or personality to a single broadcast I'd be willing to give him a shadow of a chance, but I've never heard it, so I don't.
He is infinitely better than McCarver, though, who is a joke beyond repair. And like I said, I admire his approach to his professionalism, even if I can't stand the sum of his parts.
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Re:
Re:
One of the reasons that I think Miller is so unbelievably good is that he gets sincerely excited by exciting plays, but he never kills the play by over-calling it. He makes the call short so you can watch it without him being in the way, but you can hear the baseball fan in there when he's doing it, and his excitement is the same regardless of team, and his fanboy is more excited the more it counts. That's the guy I want in my room. The guy I can share the moment with.
I just can't imagine being at a game and calling the game 7 NLCS walk off home run with the same level of control and detachment as you would call a slider off the outside corner of the plate in spring training and it always feels awful to me when I hear him do it.
But that's just how I feel. And it's not like I don't have a clear personal preference for excited calls: my favorite call of all time is easily Starky's call of The Play. Even the typescript sends chills down my spine.
It kills me trying to imagine Buck doing that call.
BUCK: "And Cal takes the kickoff. It's a good runback. There's a lateral. And another one. The play is still going. And the Stanford Band appears to be on the field. There's another lateral. The play's still going, and it looks like Cal scores. We'll wait for official word on that. While we wait, hey Tim, did you see the Michigan Ohio State game? Two powerhouse teams in that matchup in a very close game. Yeah, that was fun. I really like the Michigan band, too. Very professional. Alright, it looks like the touchdown counts and Cal wins. The Stanford band is still on the field, and, understandably, nobody in red looks happy. That was fun. Congratulations to the Golden Bears, and we'll see you later America."
MCCARVER: "Dur, that second pass there looked like a fastball. I know because I was a catcher, and catchers know that stuff, dur."
I just like a little personal investment to go alongside a good, sincere call.
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Re:
For example:
"Thomson hits a 3 run homer to left field. Giants win."
or, (this was a very popular game on this board)
"Zabransky takes the snap and throws ... oh no, he handed it off to Johnson. Boise State wins."
Re:
McCarver: "Montana saw Dwight open and that's why he passed it to him. Even with the pressure he was under, he was able to get the pass off. Like Cliff Eastwood in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly, He was feelin' lucky."
by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 11, 2007 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Re:
It would be fun to see somebody give it an honest go. It's just that call by Starky was so unbelievable... I can't even believe it.
by howtheyscored on Jul 11, 2007 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Re:
Re:
by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 11, 2007 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: <b></b>
I haven't been able to stand Buck and McCarver since 2002 and couldn't really stand them before then either.
The Taco Bell hit contest was hilarious. You'd think the guy would have at least practiced, like, a little bit. He must have known he was going to get a chance to hit a ball, right?
Not using Pujols was insane.
But I must admit, it was funny when Byrnes' dog started paddling his way to Alameda.
Re: <b></b>
Giants reach final four...
vr, Xei
Re: Giants reach final four...
Re: Giants reach final four...
Because if it's wrong, I think I'll just ignore it.
Re: Giants reach final four...
vr, Xei
Re: Giants reach final four...
Re: Giants reach final four...
by Tajiri on Jul 11, 2007 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Giants reach final four...
by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 11, 2007 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Giants reach final four...
by PacBellBoozer on Jul 12, 2007 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Giants reach final four...
by howtheyscored on Jul 12, 2007 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: <b></b>
/still thinks Arlene is hawt.

by 



















