McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Open Lincecum First Thoughts

Thoughts on Lincecum:

  • He got a ton of swingthroughs...the first time through the lineup. Then the velocity dropped, which I don't remember as a problem in the minors. The velocity dropped to 91-93, though, which isn't far off from where he supposed to be. That makes me think his heart was thipping like a hummingbird's at the start of the game.
  • Straight fastball? Pffffft. Maybe he's fiddled with his grip since that was the early rap on him, but I didn't exactly see an two-dimensional Brett Tomko special. The pitch to Ryan Howard was a pitch-on-a-string, but his fastball had a little more movement than I thought it would.
  • After the first-inning hanger to Shane Victorino, Lincecum didn't throw more than a handful of breaking balls. I don't know if that was an improvised call from Bengie Molina, or if it was a predetermined decision. Matt Cain used throw an overwhelming majority of fastballs in his first few starts, and Jason Schmidt would occassionally wait until the second
  • Cole Hamels is good. I would totally trade Steve Kline to get him if it came to that. Okay, that isn't really a thought on Lincecum, but dang. Good looking young pitcher.
  • It would have been a lot cooler if Lincecum pitched a perfect game. But it would be way too easy to read too much into a pitcher's first start. There were good things, there were bad things. I can't wait for his next start.

0 recs  |  Comment 123 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Not exactly the worst start the Giants could have gotten from him, but a little less than we all expected. 5 K's came early and they all came with the 1st ten batters. I think we all agree he's better than Ortiz anyday

by K on May 6, 2007 8:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
It seemed like he was probably overthrowing the first few innings due to nerves (he was averaging 97-98), and then his velocity dropped in the later innings due to that.

I saw some good things, there were some bad things. I wish they'd called for the curve a few more times. Overall, I think he'll be fine. The Phillies are also a very tough, very patient lineup and the umpires didn't exactly give him any breaks.

No one thought he was going to dominate the majors like he did AAA and this wouldn't be the first time a young pitcher got knocked around a little in his first start.

Also, Shane Victorino is one of my new least-favorite players. The umpires had better admit they messed up that call.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on May 6, 2007 8:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
If Victorino wore orange and black, he'd be my favorite player pretty quickly.

BB

All those Giants fans down in Giants land love that Crazy Crab!

by BlackDougal on May 6, 2007 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
He'd be pretty much everyone's favorite player. Lincecum throws on Friday night against Colorado. Mile High stadium is where those home runs do leave the park.

San Francisco fans who enjoyed watching Shane Victorino: 0

by K on May 6, 2007 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I enjoyed watching Shane Victorino a LOT.  He was really good against the Giants.  Then again, he's no Todd Linden. :)

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Wouldn't be mine.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on May 6, 2007 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
If Victorino wore orange and black, he'd ground into double plays and run into outs at third.
Mandowear | comics | Sugarman FTW

by Natto on May 6, 2007 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
don't forget the whole "hack at slop" part...

by Rusty the Mechanical Man on May 6, 2007 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
The obstruction call was indeed pretty horrible.  If Shane had continued on the line he used to run into Omar, he would have wound up far closer to third base than to second.

Someone wiser than I came up with the idea that the umpire saw a chance to show that he could apply the new interpretation of the baseline rule.  My speculation was that the second-base umpire might have taken his eye off the runner to follow the ball when it was thrown to Rich Aurilia.

Whatever the cause of the gaffe, it is that kind of play that mocks the game -- and I would say the same thing if it had been Omar on the bases instead of Shane. Smart play by Victorino -- but not one that should have been rewarded.

At what point does common sense enter into a call?  In this instance, not at all.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Looked good, but like a rookie.  Maybe this start was an advertisement for using him as a closer, because those 97s sure disappeared quickly.  And I'll be curious to see what else he throws.  Also, foggy nights in June will help take care of those home runs, at least that one from Victorino.
All those Giants fans down in Giants land love that Crazy Crab!

by BlackDougal on May 6, 2007 8:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Tim was clocked at 95 mph on the 146th pitch of his two-hit, 18-strikeout shutout over UCLA last spring.  I wouldn't be overly worried about his velocity dropping because he is tiring.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Anyone else think the strike zone was pretty small for the first 5 innings or so? I wonder if that had any impact on Lincecum not wanting to throw as much breaking stuff?

by xanthan on May 6, 2007 8:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I don't know what they were saying on ESPN, but Kuip & Flem were going on about the tight strike zone at length on the radio side.

by non sequitur on May 6, 2007 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
On ESPN, they were saying: "ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL  ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL ROGER CLEMENS BONDS POLL "
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on May 6, 2007 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I was disappointed to miss The Enchanter's debut live on TV, but between botched ESPN telecasts and Cammy Blackstone (still don't know what this is about and don't want to find out), I'm less and less unhappy going radio-only.

by non sequitur on May 6, 2007 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

TV on mute, radio on high
The delay can be maddening (radio is usually a heartbeat ahead, turning the announcers into psychics on close plays) but it's the only way to go.

Second choice:  TV on mute, period.

by wedge on May 6, 2007 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: TV on mute, radio on high
Gameday Audio is gonna be like a minute ahead of the TV ... not really an option, sadly.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on May 6, 2007 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: TV on mute, radio on high
I mean behind obviously.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on May 6, 2007 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: TV on mute, radio on high
the radio-tv delay was about 10 seconds for us last night.  digital cable?  not sure why it was so far behind, but it made it really impossible to do the radio trick.
2002? I'm over it. But I'll never be over Rich Aurilia.

by wjackalope on May 7, 2007 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Since umpires tend to squeeze rookies, I'm not surprised.
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 6, 2007 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I can't speak for the major league umpires, but when I was umpiring, I didn't care which pitcher was on the mound.  I was going to make every effort to call a ball, a ball and a strike, a strike.

It didn't matter if it was a pitcher of water or a pitcher of beer.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
It was pretty tight for Hamels, too.

by Grant on May 6, 2007 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Yeah, Kuip/Flem quickly noted that, too. About Feliz's first AB: "He struck out twice. Once looking, except Hamels didn't get the call. And then Pedro struck out swinging on the next pitch."

by non sequitur on May 6, 2007 8:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Thank god Kuip was at the mic with Flem because I swear if I hear F.P. Santangelo again...

San Francisco Giants fans who enjoy watching Shane Victorino: 0

by K on May 6, 2007 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Squeezed
I thought the  zone was OK in the first two innings. He defintely got squeezed in the 3'rd and the Howard HR was a direct result of that.  A pure frustration pitch.

by DrBGiantsfan on May 6, 2007 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
After reviewing the video of the game, I felt the close pitches were pretty evenly balanced between strikes and balls.  There were a couple of balls that I felt should have been strikes, and also two strikes that I felt should have been balls.

Jim Reynolds' umpire stats show him to be a rather neutral umpire this season -- neither a batters' umpire nor a pitchers' ump.

And I will say that umpires in general probably call more balls strikes than vice versa.  From the mound I'm sure Tim felt squeezed, but he was also missing by a lot on many pitches.

Tim had his control to the first 11 batters (30 strikes, 16 balls).  And that far into the game (2 2/3 innings), he was doing OK (two hits, one walk, five strikeouts).  But he lost control to the last dozen batters he faced (23 strikes, 31 balls), indicating that he can get by with one pitch as long as he has control -- but likely not without it.

I would have liked to see the curve called more often, especially when Tim was ahead in the count.  But ironically, I DIDN'T want him to throw the 0-2 curve to Victorino.

My feeling was that Tim should was a fastball (a thought brought up by Joe Morgan a few batters later when Tim WAS able to get a batter to chase the high, hard one) and THEN throw the curve if necessary.  The pitch was in the middle of the kill zone (right where a pitcher WOULDN'T want to throw a pitch), so it was likely to be hit just as well one pitch later.  But perhaps Tim WOULD have gotten Shane out with a fastball out of the zone and not had to even throw him the curve.

Overall, however, I felt the Giants gave up on both the curve and change when they should have given Tim a better opportunity to get command of the second and third strikeout pitches he throws.  Tim's curve is his best pitch, and I had it being thrown only 10% of the time.  His change is a good pitch, too, and I had that pitch being thrown only twice.

Probably the most encouraging aspect of Tim's performance was that he showed that on that day, at least, he could pitch with only one of his three pitches working -- as long as he had control of it.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I liked what I saw.  No need to rush him to the pen.  Can't wait for the Zito, Cain, Lincecum, Lowry, Sanchez (I really like what we saw from him tonight) rotation.

Trade Morris back to the Cards and put Ortiz in the pen.  

by slcgiant on May 6, 2007 8:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Me too - I thought Lincy showed enough of what he's got.  The Victorino homer was a big mistake -- he'll learn -- but it was also wind-enhanced.  The Ryan Howard one ... sure that's on Lincecum's tab, but it's also just what happens when Ryan Howard is around.  I'll give the kid a pass there.

Terrible line tonight, but I want to see what he does when he gets comfortable.  Remember, in addition to everything else, and all the pressure, the poor guy had to BAT, his first real at-bat in about 8 years, and against Cole Hamels no less!

I don't want to see Lincecum as a closer.  I want to see what he does given the space to work on that curveball.  I want to see the movement on that fastball get honed enough to confound hitters once, twice, three times a night.  

by wedge on May 6, 2007 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Tim had six or seven at bats at Fresno.  Prior to that, he hadn't batted since high school.  At Fresno, Tim got two hits, both up the middle.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Food for thought
In Koufax's (Koufax'?) first start he lasted 4 2/3 and gave up 8 walks.
Armando Benitez confirms that 2007 is indeed the year of the pig.

by CystedTwister on May 6, 2007 8:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Food for thought
Koufaxes?
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 6, 2007 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Food for thought
Thank You for calming my nerves...

-D

by dw4848 on May 6, 2007 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Food for thought
Grammar Warriors, unite!

The famous Grammar Thread

I would write "Koufax's".

David Arnott
Sportszilla -- Kickass Sports Writing
Adopted EME

by David Arnott on May 6, 2007 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and you would be correct to do so
Angels fly because they take Brian Sabean lightly.

by Mayor of 311 on May 7, 2007 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Food for thought
According to Baseball Musings.com, Sandy gave up two runs, seven hits, one walk and struck out five over four innings during his first start.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Like I said in the GameDay thread I saw positives and negatives. Lots to build on and lots to improve. He'll be fine, I think.
Strikeouts are boring. Besides that, they're fascist. Not boring: Emmanuel Burriss. Not fascist: SF Dugout

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 6, 2007 8:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Cole Hamels
Whattheheck is so great about Cole Hamels?  This is the first time I"ve really seen him pitch.  To hear folks on other message boards talk, he's the modern day Sandy Koufax.  Let's see, 88-90 FB, plus changeup, decent curve he hardly ever throws.....hey!  He's the next Noah Lowry!!

by DrBGiantsfan on May 6, 2007 8:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
The changeup was pretty nasty tonight... and he's got way better K/IP numbers than Noah ever had, even when Noah was great.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on May 6, 2007 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
If Lowry had a better idea of where the ball was going and a more consistent changeup, he'd be fantastic.

by Grant on May 6, 2007 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
Is it just me or does it seem that Noah has sorta moved away from the change this year? In the starts that I've seen him pitch he seems to throw the curve now instead of the change.

by xanthan on May 6, 2007 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
There was a brief discussion about that the other day. I think Noah's realized that batters are looking for that changeup, so he's been trying to mix it up.
Mandowear | comics | Sugarman FTW

by Natto on May 6, 2007 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
Hamels racks up the Ks.  You didn't see him at his best tonight.

by wedge on May 6, 2007 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
Nine strikeouts in 7 innings isn't anything to sneeze at, though. That'd be the highest total for a Giant pitcher this season.

by Steve on May 6, 2007 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
Yeah, Hamels is a stud. For one, he's more around 93 than 88-90, and for two that changeup isn't "plus" it's "really friggin' good."
Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar

by JakeS on May 6, 2007 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
yeah that change is definitely plus plus.  and his curve is above average.  He's an absolute stud.  K's kids like nobody's business.
Lincecum, Lincecum 12 stories tall, made of radiation.

by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on May 6, 2007 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

93?
I was watching every pitch for the first 4+ innings.  Hamels might have hit 93 once or twice, but 90% of his FB were 88-90.  As for the changeup, yeah, it's good, but I've seen better ones from Noah than any I saw tonight.

by DrBGiantsfan on May 6, 2007 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: 93?
Eh, 188 Ks in 173 major-league innings with an ERA below 4 despite pitching in that bandbox they have in Philly - I'd trade two Noah Lowrys for the guy.
Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar

by JakeS on May 6, 2007 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lowry
When Noah has good command he's awesome.  Just judging by tonight, Hamel's got much better control than Noah.  
Zealously advocating for Nate the Great since 2007.

by orangeandblackattack on May 6, 2007 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Cole Hamels
I would trade Noah Lowry for Cole Hamels in a flash.  Cole has already struck out 15 in a game.  Noah's career high is 10.  Cole is also three years younger than Noah and has exceeded Noah's career high in strikeouts four times alrady.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Lincecum is good, but he's no Roger Clemens! Did you know he signed with the Yankees?
Mandowear | comics | Sugarman FTW

by Natto on May 6, 2007 8:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Gosh, really?  I wonder where I could find more information about that.

by Widget on May 6, 2007 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Heck with that, I'm wondering what people think about Barry Bonds.  Especially since he had nothing to do with the game tonight.

by wedge on May 6, 2007 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Apparently, Black fans are rooting for Bonds more than White fans.  How freakin' relevant is THAT ESPN?!  

-D

by dw4848 on May 6, 2007 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Well, it's understandable since Bud played for the giants and is still managing in the NL West.  Rondell, was is pretty much an AL guy.
Ryan Klesko; establishing his presence with authority. 313/365/417 as of 5/5/07

by Goofus on May 7, 2007 6:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Are you saying it isn't a black and white issue?  :)

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Joe Morgan seems to have a lot of really important friends. I wish he would talk about himself more.
I'll take the freight train, Bengie Molina.

by Brother Bummer on May 6, 2007 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Sometimes when they draw that little box up over the strike zone and show where the pitches went Morgan is forced to talk about the game...

by Rusty the Mechanical Man on May 6, 2007 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I think I once heard he used to play for a baseball team in Boston.  You know, the Boston Espn Sox.
All those Giants fans down in Giants land love that Crazy Crab!

by BlackDougal on May 6, 2007 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At the game tonight
Although he wasn't perfect tonight and I thought he got squeezed from where I was sitting I take some good things away from tonight.
  1. He is a Major League starter without a doubt.  I'm giddy about his next start.  He struck out the side in the first inning against a very good lineup.
  2. Being in the stadium while somebody is throwing 100 MPH is exciting no matter what the score.
  3. I thought they should have made him pitch to Howard in the 5th inning even with first base open.  I'm a firm believer in throwing rookies into the fire.  
I thought he had a changeup.  Was I wrong?  It was all fastballs tonight.  When he gets a chance to calm down and throw the curve ball for a strike he will be back to being untouchable.  Here's to the future!!!!
"Why you gotta be cardin' my hos?" - Charlie Hayes

by stevieg on May 6, 2007 9:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't mean to crash the party
but was disappointed in The Kid's debut. He threw way too many pitches, gave up two HR's and allowed far too many walks. I have been a solid supporter of promoting Lincecum and hope his next outings improve dramatically.

by wilriv21 on May 6, 2007 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Don't mean to crash the party
I doubt you'll be disappointed.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn sfgiants.com...
No video for Lincecum!  Only throws I saw him make were to Howard and Victorino.
Here's to a good 2007. Or 2008. Or 2009. Or 2010. Or...

by WalrusMan on May 6, 2007 9:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I thought it was fairly promising; he flashed what he could do with those three Ks in the first, probably wouldn't have had a couple of those walks with an average strikezone and didn't really blow up under pressure.

It was disappointing, for sure, but he's no less of an amazing prospect tonight than he was this morning.

Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar

by JakeS on May 6, 2007 10:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Basically, I'm not worried at all - the only thing even remotely worrisome was the drop in velocity, but I'm pretty sure that was from getting too amped up at first - he's not a guy who is going to clock 100 mph every time out but I'd bet he'll sit at closer to 95 for the duration of starts once he settles in.
Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar

by JakeS on May 6, 2007 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Very nice job of keeping things in perspective, Jake!

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I just got back from the game. My thoughts:
  • Tim was throwing a ton of heat in the first couple of innings (97-100 range), but then dropped to 95/96 and finally low about 93 in his last inning or so.
  • From where I was sitting I couldn't tell if he was getting squeezed.
  • he was up in the zone all night. I didn't see him throw too many fastballs low in the zone.
  • it didn't seem like he threw that many curveballs. I know he has a really good one, and that he can throw it for strikes. Because of nerves, he was probably overthrowing and couldn't get that bite on it.
  • he seemed nervous to me. Also, I don't recall what inning it was, but while he was on deck, a weak foul found its way right to him. He didn't know what to do with it and threw it back to the umpire who immediately tossed it to the ball boy who was standing a few feet away. Maybe that's just a starry-eyed thing or it doesn't work that way in the minors, but it made me believe he was nervous or felt out of place a little bit.
The bottom line is that I'm not worried about him. He was understandably pumped up for his first major league start, which was on ESPN Sunday Night, etc and there is simply a ton of pressure on him to succeed. Also, with no Bonds in the lineup, he knew he'd have to hold the powerful Phils in check. With all that was riding on his debut, being the "Franchise" and all of the unrealistice expectations, nothing short of a dominating performance would have constituted success, which is, of course, unfair.

These extra pressures won't be there in the future, I just hope Tim understands that and goes out and pitches his game. I sure wouldn't want to lose his confidence from this one outing, which had some positives for him. He'll be fine.

Tim Lincecum has been freed!

by nostocksjustbonds on May 6, 2007 10:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I was there too, and I agree that he was up in the zone a lot, but also in his defense the low strike wasn't being called much at all.

by Josh from The New Giant Thrill on May 7, 2007 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lincecum!
--I'm not sure I've ever seen a Giants pitcher throw so hard. Still, I hope he paces himself a little better next time.

--My wife thinks he's cute but wonders about his teeth.

--He got a lot of swings-and-misses on the fastball.

--Better command and a few more breaking balls might just do the trick in his next start. Too bad it's in Coors Field. I hate that place.

by Dan from NM on May 6, 2007 10:20 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

His teeth!
Well , yeah. Plus , he looks like Ferris Buehler's tall buddy.
  Folks Who Know...when he pitched AAA did his velocity change that much?
  I just want to fast forward to his fourth start , when he's adjusted.
Halleluia! We Has Risen!

by victor frankenstein on May 7, 2007 1:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I'm just going out on a limb here, but ESPN's "K" zone brought to you by some shit you didn't need is one of the worst, most misleading inventions for sports entertainment in a long while.  It called a pitch at Pedro's ankles an obvious strike, and surprise surprise the umpire called it as such.
Lincecum, Lincecum 12 stories tall, made of radiation.

by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on May 6, 2007 10:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
It's like when a consistently just - outside pitcher will get the strike , so it is with a batter who swings at a pitch in a particular location...the ump just figured that was Pedro's Feliz zone...and who here can refute that?
Halleluia! We Has Risen!

by victor frankenstein on May 7, 2007 1:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
noo it was just an unbelievably off system.  It's the same box for every hitter.  It'd be a bitch for richie sexson
Lincecum, Lincecum 12 stories tall, made of radiation.

by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on May 7, 2007 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
His command was poor - probably just nerves.  Got some good life on those fastballs at the beginning of the game.  Didn't hardly see him using anything but a fastball.

The next outing will tell us more.  You could tell he was amped up.  

Zealously advocating for Nate the Great since 2007.

by orangeandblackattack on May 6, 2007 10:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh well, better luck next time L-Cum
if you would've read this website you would've known that the Giants and L-Cum were heavy underdogs to win this game.
vr, Xei
Go Dodgers!

by Xeifrank on May 6, 2007 10:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh thank you so much
I was so stupid to have high hopes for this game. Hey make sure to stop by and remind us about your prediction software again sometime. It's weird that I have never heard you talk about it.
Eatin' D-Backs and crappin' out Rockies.

by camwoody on May 7, 2007 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Someone on the radio tonight brought up that against the Phils, Lincecum was pitching out of the stretch more in five innings than he probably did in all his AAA starts combined. That had to have affected his line. That and pitching against major league hitters.

Tim the Enchanter will be fine in the long run, but tonight was a good splash of cold water for all of us. The hype and expectations were out of control, which was fun, but this was somewhere around the result that should have been expected. E's note of caution proved prescient. Let's hope Lince-K doesn't get rocked for 10 runs on Friday night in Denver. But I'm still looking forward to watching him pitch.

Lon Simmons' adopted dad.

by Kitspool on May 6, 2007 10:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Eh, I wouldn't call it a splash of cold water exactly. It would have been cool to watch him dominate, but I'm my expectations of what Tim can contribute down the stretch this season haven't really been effected by this one start.
Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar

by JakeS on May 6, 2007 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
one more thing, and not to compare too much, but in Phillip Hughes' much heralded debut a couple weeks ago, he went 4.1 gave up 7 hits, 4 ers and k'd 5. He only walked one, but he bounced back his next start to throw 6.1 no-hit innings (before unfortunately getting injured, which won't happen to Tim).
Tim Lincecum has been freed!

by nostocksjustbonds on May 6, 2007 10:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Apples and Oranges
The big difference is that Phillip Hughes is teammates with ROGER CLEMENS, WHO'S COMING BACK TO PITCH FOR THE YANKEES. Not sure if you had heard about that.
Lon Simmons' adopted dad.

by Kitspool on May 6, 2007 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Apples and Oranges
HANK AARON HATES BARRY BONDS.
I'll take the freight train, Bengie Molina.

by Brother Bummer on May 7, 2007 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Apples and Oranges
the point is, don't be surprised if this outing was an aberation and Tim comes back to throw well his next time out, which has nothing to do with Roger Clemens who wasn't on the Yankees in Hughes' 2nd start.
Tim Lincecum has been freed!

by nostocksjustbonds on May 7, 2007 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Apples and Oranges
I'm pretty sure he was poking sarcastic fun at ESPN's relentless coverage about Clemens, not making an actual point regarding Lincecum vs. Hughes.
Ryan Klesko; establishing his presence with authority. 313/365/417 as of 5/5/07

by Goofus on May 7, 2007 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Apples and Oranges
yeah, I saw that after I responded. I didn't see the game coverage (at the time of my response), so it wasn't foremost in my mind.
Tim Lincecum has been freed!

by nostocksjustbonds on May 7, 2007 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Yeah, I'll echo what's been said here - he stayed away a lot from that curveball, and overall, looked pretty decent IMO. The Victorino call was BS of the highest order, but the stuff is there to dominate. I did get a bunch of comments on my McCoveyChronicles. com t-shirt, with lots of people laughing at the Dodger quote.

by Aadik on May 6, 2007 10:49 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
It's late, so probably no one will read this, but, Barry Bonds went 0-5 in his first start.  This game is no more an indicator for a career than Opening Day is for a season.

by rocknjosie on May 6, 2007 11:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Nothing but fastballs when he fell behind, and even then he was still wild. He couldn't get it in the zone, and when he did he got ripped deep, twice. He didn't have his beast curve, he didn't have his offspeed, he didn't even attempt his slider he's been messing around with. Lincecum's nerves got to him, thats fine, shit happens. He is human after all...or so we think
*If you Lince him, he will come*

by smirnoff on May 7, 2007 12:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Even Alien Cyborgs get nerves.
Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on May 7, 2007 1:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
But ROGER CLEMENS SIGNED WITH THE YANKEES!
What else matters?
 
Halleluia! We Has Risen!

by victor frankenstein on May 7, 2007 1:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Just watched a bit of the tape on my Slingbox.  He looked nervous, and he left a lot of pitches up.  He didn't have great command early on, which may have contributed to his getting squeezed later on.

He does have some nice stuff, good late movement on the fastball, the curve looked good, didn't see a change (but didn't watch the whole game).  His stretch move looked average-to-below-average, Rollins had the bag stolen in the first if Victorino hadn't hit the HR.

Hope he learns from this.  I don't think more time in AAA making PCL hitters look silly would have made his debut any better.  It's clear he's got the stuff to pitch in the majors; now he's got to get the approach and the command together.  Of course, you could say that about dozens of guys...

Adopting Dave Roberts since 2007

by hometownboy on May 7, 2007 2:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Overall, I was impressed with Lincecum.  He dropped a curve ball on Howard in the first inning that had me out of my chair.  Hope all of the "Savior of the Team" talk didn't make him nervous.  Rough game to Tivo and watch until 3am though.

by benny on May 7, 2007 3:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I agree with hometownboy; he doesn't need to go back to AAA. What we do with our other 5 starters, I don't know; but Tim needs to stay in SF. He showed all the pieces of the puzzle. I have no doubt he'll put them all together.

by Lyle on May 7, 2007 5:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Roger Clemens is getting $28 mil this year for what 20 something starts. Maybe even less than that. That's over 1 mil per start.
Stan Conte is a traitor!!

by K on May 7, 2007 7:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
My Take.

Take that for what you will.

Coming to you by proxy (I adopted: Dave Righetti!)

by howtheyscored on May 7, 2007 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
The $28M is the pro-rated amount (what he would've gotten over a full season). What he's actually getting amounts to about $4.5 million a month, which means he's making at least $750,000 per start (if they manage to squeeze 6 starts out of him in a month).
Adopted father of the All-Father - 0.00 ERA, .154 BAA as of 4/26

by EliminateMe on May 7, 2007 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Clemens' salary is pro-rated, which you haven't taken into account with that $1 million+ per start calculation.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, Where's Sharksrog?
He didn't seriously think Timmy was going to pitch a complete game 3 hit shutout with 12 K's did he?  It's OK Shark, most of us think the kid is going to do just fine.

by DrBGiantsfan on May 7, 2007 7:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I was at the game. (BTW, what a night!  It was over 80 degrees after 8 PM.  The sky was amazing.  Gorgeous even for the Big Phone).

Lincecum reminded me of when I was coaching Little League, particuarly the 11 and 12 year-olds. At that level the top pitchers could really dominate, but when they first got hit, usually in the All-Stars, they had no frame of reference to right themselves.

He really seemed to lose all of his confidence after the Howard home run. And as pointed out, he was pitching out of the stretch the entire game, except for the 2nd.  This was also a new experience for him.

Let's see how he gets his nerve back and manages his game.  Successful athletes with great talent learn to manage their game, pacing themselves to find a high level of consistency and then turning it on at the appropriate time, to set themselves apart from the others.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." - Jimi Hendrix

by GiantJim on May 7, 2007 9:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Arthur: What manner of man are you that you can   summon up fastball without height or girth?
Tim: I... am a prospect.
Arthur: By what name are you known?
Tim: There are some who call me... 'Tim'
Arthur: ...greetings, Tim the Prospect.

by GiantQuacker on May 7, 2007 9:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
A few thoughts on Lincecum:
  1. Far be it for me to grant Joe Morgan any kind of sense, much less a good point, but what if Lince throws Victorino a high fastball on 0-2?  Chances are he gets the K, and the inning, and possibly the game, turn out differently.
  2. I don't know what the plan was going in, but it seems he may have lost confidence in his curveball after Victorino.  He threw a nasty one to Howard, and then one outside for a ball to Burrell, and that was it for the 1st.  I'm too lazy to go back and look at the rest of the game, but my recollection is that he just tried to throw gas on pretty much 90% of the rest of his pitches, whether out of design or frustration I don't know.
  3. Whither the changeup?  He supposedly has a plus change, too, right?  And I don't recall seeing any (at least none that stood out in my mind).
  4. The Phillies' patience obviously hurt Lincecum.  The Rockies are pretty patient, too, though without the pop in the lineup that the Phillies have.  I hope Lincecum isn't afraid to pitch to contact a bit more, like he seemed to do in the 2nd inning.

by juanboy on May 7, 2007 10:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

point #2
...Grant has already made, and I need to improve my re-reading skills.

by juanboy on May 7, 2007 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

point #2
...Grant has already made, and I need to improve my re-reading skills.

by juanboy on May 7, 2007 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: point #2
...and my posting skills, too.

Fuck.

by juanboy on May 7, 2007 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
At the game, the guy sitting next to me was calling for the curve -- based on my having said it was Tim's best pitch -- on the 0-2 to Victorino in the first.  I said,no, that Tim should waste another fastball first.

I was somewhat surprised to hear Joe Morgan make a similar comment a few batters later.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Anyone else notice that Tim's motion looks more normal from the cwenterfield camera than in all those college shots from the side we've been seeing?

I'll be interested to watch a Kruk analysis of his delivery on the next broadcast.

Ryan Klesko; establishing his presence with authority. 313/365/417 as of 5/5/07

by Goofus on May 7, 2007 10:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
While at the game, and I was sitting behind home plate, it looked remarkably normal.  I have the feeling that it looks unusual in slow motion but not so much in real speed.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." - Jimi Hendrix

by GiantJim on May 7, 2007 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No
It looked normal from behind the plate last year when I saw him pitch in Stockton too. You really have to see it from the 3rd base angle, preferably in slo-mo.
Lint Succumb forever! Adopted dad of Minor Izzy

by hairball on May 7, 2007 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Actually I did notice that.  Thanks, goofus - wondered if it was just me.

I remember seeing him at San Jose, and his delivery looking weird.  Maybe he's changed something a bit?  I'm not a good enough judge of pitching to say.

by wedge on May 7, 2007 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I do not believe Tim's motion has changed much, if at all.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
When one watches Tim from the side, one can see the explosion forward of his body.  When one watched from in front of Tim, it actually looks as if Tim is throwing rather easily -- until the ball explodes toward the plate.  The view from behind is most similar to the view from in front in that regard.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I was also surprised to see so many fastballs.  I think he got a little scared to use it after hanging one and having it get crushed.  Not that he was shaking Molina off though... maybe Molina was afraid to ask for it again.  

He definitely showed flashes of brilliance, and if he can keep the ball more down in the zone, break off a few more curves, and not walk too many guys, he should be very very very good.  I too am excited for his next start.

2002? I'm over it. But I'll never be over Rich Aurilia.

by wjackalope on May 7, 2007 11:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I keep thinking the kid was too amped up and didn't have command of the curve or change-up while warming up, so Molina didn't call for it.

They probably tried a few before each inning, but with the tight strike zone, it just wasn't going to be there.

On KNBR this morning, Kruk was complaining about the tight strike zone for both pitchers.  He also mentioned that Tim probably had too much adreneline going and was throwing through the breaking ball.

Ryan Klesko; establishing his presence with authority. 313/365/417 as of 5/5/07

by Goofus on May 7, 2007 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Pitching in a road game, where no one gives a damn who he is, will probably do Tim some good.  He'll be able to breathe.  (In Colorado's thin air, yes, but you get my point.)

by wedge on May 7, 2007 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Linc was very Cain-like yesterday. Nothing but fastballs, a change he couldn't locate and a low 80s curve that looks more like a BP fastball than a breaking pitch.

We really need a new pitching coach/philosophy. Someone who will make these guys throw strikes. There's no excuse for Linc, Cain or Sanchez nibbling when they can blow fastballs by guys with little effort. Fine these guys for every walk they give up. Do something!

The bright side: Brian Sabean will be out of a job in a few months.

by Punch Rockgroin on May 7, 2007 3:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Whatever happened to pitching inside?
We really need a new pitching coach/philosophy. Someone who will make these guys throw strikes.

I have always enjoyed watching LA Dodgers philosophy of having their pitchers attack the inside of the plate. Few, if any, Giant pitchers pitch inside. Would also enjoy seeing making the batter change their line of sight - pitching up and down in the strike zone.

by wilriv21 on May 7, 2007 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I think you need to relax a little bit. Changing the pitching coach/philosophy will not make these guys throw strikes. I hate it as much as you do that they have overpowering stuff, but fail to challenge hitters enough, but there IS an excuse for it: Their age. Cain and Lincecum are just 22, and Sanchez is 24. Only Cain even has a full year of MLB under his belt. Their walk rates are bad, but not ridiculously so, considering their age and experience.

I know it must seem like they're unique in their inability to challenge hitters with their unhittable stuff (and presumably, that's why you want to lay the blame at Righetti's feet), but they are actually the norm. You want historical context? Here it is: Sandy Koufax, Nolan Ryan and Randy Johnson are known as three of the most unhittable pitchers ever, and sure-fire Hall of Famers, but early in their careers none of them could find the strike zone. In fact, Koufax was still walking OVER 5 BATTERS PER 9 INNINGS in his Age 24 season. Johnson was still walking OVER 6 BATTERS/9 IP as late as his AGE 28 SEASON. Ryan was walking OVER 6 BATTERS/9 IP in his AGE 30 SEASON.

These guys have typical command for pitchers their age, and will learn to control the strike zone more as they get more experince. It may be a frustrating process, but it's only natural, and should be well worth the wait.

by English Professor on May 7, 2007 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I'm just saying I get the sense that the coaching staff is okay with walks, or at least more relaxed about it than they should be. As if it's better to give up a free pass than a hit. How many times have we seen an 0-2 count turn into a 3-2 count from our pitchers? This applies to everyone on the pitching staff. I singled out those three because they've got the most potential and I'd really hate to see them a) never develop or b) develop for another team.
The bright side: Brian Sabean will be out of a job in a few months.

by Punch Rockgroin on May 7, 2007 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Tim has cut his walk rate in half since his sophomore season.  He was at about six per nine, and as a professional he has been closer to three per nine.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
The curve looked pretty good to me, actually.

And, although Lincecum's fastball is good, a good hitter will still hit it hard if it catches too much of the plate.  He can blow AAA hitters away with it (and there are a lot of AAA hitters masquerading as major leaguers out there, too), but "trust your stuff" only gets you so far in the big leagues.

Adopting Dave Roberts since 2007

by hometownboy on May 7, 2007 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
I saw a guy in Class A just crush a fastball Tim left up in the zone and over the plate.  Fortunately, he can get away with it more than most -- and he doesn't make that mistake often.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Tim's curve looks not in the least like a BP fastball. I would compare it more closely to Niagara Falls.  Tim's change looks like a BP fastball, except that the bottom drops out.

by sharksrog on May 8, 2007 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Open Lincecum First Thoughts
Whatever it is he threw to Victorino, it looked like crap. That's not to say when he's sharp and on his A-game it won't improve. Cain threw a lazy hanging curve to Beltran in the first inning of last night's game, but came back to throw nasty breaking pitches later in the game. I'd expect Linc to be the same way once he settles in.
The bright side: Brian Sabean will be out of a job in a few months.

by Punch Rockgroin on May 9, 2007 1:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Shadow_grad_small
We're interested in Uggla...
Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!
Panda_bubble_small
First Baseman of the future
Timmy_avatar_small
Downloadable Game Broadcasts?
29x2_small
All-time favorite SF Giants: closer
Small
Would you trade Jeremy Affeldt?
Panda_bubble_small
Sabean putting alot of weight in Winter leagues?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S