WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez for Matsui
John Heyman is saying that Sanchez is the one for Matsui. Yanks might take on some salary.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
286 comments
Comments
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
I just threw up in my mouth a little.
by Scottsdale on
Dec 6, 2007 1:54 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Matsui is a productive hitter, but I don't really know about a 33 year old with his contract.
Also, doesn't he have a no-trade clause?
Marketing wise and Japanese TV revenue wise I guess he'd pay for himself.
I really don't buy it though, doesn't seem like a fit for either team
by NeifiChicken on
Dec 6, 2007 1:55 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by fwoty oz on
Dec 6, 2007 1:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by sup3rk1ng on
Dec 6, 2007 2:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Angry Monkey on
Dec 6, 2007 1:56 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Update
by gianator on
Dec 6, 2007 1:56 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Update
by out machine on
Dec 6, 2007 2:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Update
by nostocksjustbonds on
Dec 6, 2007 4:50 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by sfgreg on
Dec 6, 2007 1:58 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on
Dec 6, 2007 5:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 1:58 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 2:01 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by gianator on
Dec 6, 2007 2:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
I seriously hope the thing about Lincecum was a joke, because ... no. Just no.
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 2:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I err...
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:05 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:05 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 2:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 2:21 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 2:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Plus, if you see my sig, I have other reasons to be unhappy.
by Aadik on
Dec 6, 2007 2:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If there were monies back..
Either would be fine for me. I've always heard the minor league budget comes from elsewheres as the major league payroll.
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: If there were monies back..
by kennv on
Dec 7, 2007 7:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Unless you're saying spend that $26M in scouting?
by sfgfan on
Dec 6, 2007 3:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Aadik on
Dec 6, 2007 3:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by sfgfan on
Dec 6, 2007 3:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's ironic that Porcello
The Tigers didn't rebuild the "correct" way. They signed players, Pudge Rodriguez and Magglio, who "wouldn't be on the next good Tigers team".
by rfloh on
Dec 6, 2007 10:54 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on
Dec 6, 2007 5:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by zenbitz on
Dec 6, 2007 3:21 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
because...
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes,,,
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:11 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: yes,,,
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 2:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Be patient
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: yes,,,
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 2:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you completely missed my...
There are literally NO realistic moves the Giants can make to get into the playoffs, let alone the world series. Do you really think the Giants stand any chance against Detroit, Boston, NY or Cleveland.
Our chances our minuscule no matter what we do. Trading young players does not make sense but losing Sanchez has no long term repercussions for the team
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you completely missed my...
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dude, I certainly did
I don't think the Giants can compete with those American League teams (and luckily we don't have to, but that's besides the point I guess). We have to compete with the NL West to try and get into the crap-shoot playoffs. Even so, we'd be lucky to get out of the cellar in 2007, I'll admit. Again, it boils down to how much value you put in Sanchez. I'm not as high on him as most people are I guess...my bad. I hope I'm wrong.
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 2:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
so...
In a vacuum without giving up talent, that's not a great move.
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: so...
So in a vacuum, without giving up talent, it's not a great move. But it certainly isn't a horrible one either.
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 2:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sparkling recommendation
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: sparkling recommendation
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 3:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
so...
Your argument is "Matsui is not a terrible player". No one disputes this claim. He is pretty damn close to being an exactly average player.
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: so...
This was my point. I was trying to be clear.
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 3:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
then...
That the Matsui move is not good but its OK because you don't like Sanchez?
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:18 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 3:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
by capnk on
Dec 6, 2007 4:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
In other words:
Because one team had their marketing blast through the roof because of a high profile Japanese player it doesn't me we need to find a Japanese player to excite the Japanese contingency of the Bay Area.
The Japanese are by far the SMALLEST represented Asian community in the Bay Area. If they want to sell a lot of tickets to people of the Asian persuasian they need to sign someone who's last name is Chang, Wang, or Lee.
** This is an incredibly disjointed post.
by Sigualicious on
Dec 7, 2007 11:32 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
What Chinese/Korean/non-Japanese player has the draw that someone like Ichiro or Matsui have? More importantly, which of these players are available to be signed or traded for right now?
Just because the Japanese population in the Bay Area is the smallest "Asian" community in the Bay Area, it does not mean there isn't a positive marketing potential there. I'd be willing to say there is a SIGNIFICANT positive marketing opportunity there.
by sfgfan on
Dec 7, 2007 12:00 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
If you're looking to have a marketable player BECAUSE of their ethnicity, why wouldn't you just go for the jugular? We shouldn't be arguing over which Japanese player we should get to attract more fans or which Taiwanese or Korean player either.
The fact of the matter is, the bay area is home to one of the largest populations of central americans in the US yet the Giants have done virtually nothing to promote Giants games to our locals with bilingual Spanish speakers.
So you'll forgive me that I think trading for a Japanese outfielder who is past his prime is a stupid idea if it's "marketing to a demographic" that we're after.
by Sigualicious on
Dec 7, 2007 1:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
by sfgfan on
Dec 7, 2007 1:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
I listen to the Giants broadcasts in Spanish. And the only times I hear things about the Giants on the Spanish radio stations it usually only to promote their upcoming radio broadcasts. It's also very rare to see Giants commercials on any of the spanish television stations.
And you're right the Giants don't shy away from making a big deal about the rich latin past but I think most of that is expressed to the english speaking audience. And nearly all of the spanish speaking Giant heavyweights of the past have been Domincan and various other carribeans (which is kind of like trying to get us Americans excited about great Canadian baseball players).
I know that their aren't a lot of Mexican, El Salvadorian, and Guatamalen (which is what like 90% of the bay area Spanish speakers are) ballers out there these days but I think it would be nice if the Giants made a larger effort in attracting this immense population of wouldbe Giant fans.
I realize a lot of this needs to come from within the team as well. What the Giants really need is a spanish speaking JT Snow or Rich Aurillia in their prime (talented fan favorites) and I guarantee you'll see s$#t blow up.
by Sigualicious on
Dec 7, 2007 2:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: then...
He says he's "H20 friendly"
Oh , that's NOT an "H"...
Well , Ang Lee. Better film to review in the clubhouse.
Or Stan Lee , the writer and Oliver Hardy's best bud.
by victor frankenstein on
Dec 9, 2007 6:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I suppose the
If no talent is given up, that's a GREAT move in the current market.
by rfloh on
Dec 6, 2007 10:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 2:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Take on salary?
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:05 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
No.
And if we include Lincecum, we can have Shelley Duncan? Is that a joke?
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:06 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
awful is overstating it...
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
Now, if Lincecum was included for Shelley Duncan, it would, in fact, be a horrible, awful, terrible, mind bogglingly bad deal.
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:11 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
by rxmeister on
Dec 6, 2007 7:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
by rxmeister on
Dec 6, 2007 7:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
by ResDog on
Dec 6, 2007 7:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
by sfgfan on
Dec 7, 2007 9:40 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 8:21 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: awful is overstating it...
At that time the Red Sox named Theo Epstein as their GM. Theo said immediately that the Red Sox would improve their scouting and development. Now, a lot of the reason the Red Sox won the World Series is because other than the Yankees, they have more money to spend than any other team. But part of it was some stellar draft picks they have made over the past five years.
Instead of building their scouting and development back when it could have made a significant difference for the 2008 season, the Giants were on the verge of intentionally giving up draft picks.
The Red Sox were visionary. The Giants have been reactionary. Thus Brian Sabean has dug himself such a big hole that he is actually considering "The Franchise." Literally.
by sharksrog on
Dec 7, 2007 11:45 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:12 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 2:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
However I hate that this will mean no Fred Lewis in LF, and we REALLY need to get rid of some of our OFs now.
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 2:14 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 2:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Zito is unmovable
Seriously, no team would touch him.
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:18 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Depleted Uranium Shells
by Lyle on
Dec 6, 2007 4:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
If they took Roberts, I'd be less happy, but it would pave the way for a Lewis/Davis platoon.
This could also portend another deal, like Winn for Tejada or something.
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 2:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by rotorueter on
Dec 6, 2007 2:16 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:18 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Fukodume's agent has also stated that he would take less $$ to play on the west coast.
If this deal lands us Fukudome + a decent Yanks prospect, I could actually be happy with it.
by Scottsdale on
Dec 6, 2007 2:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 2:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by rxmeister on
Dec 6, 2007 7:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Anyway, I hope this move wouldn't take away ABs from Nate or Lewis. Maybe Freduardo can play RF and Nate can snag 1B from Ortmeier (with Winn in center).
I'm in agreement with those who actually think this isn't so bad. I like Sanchez and realize that outside of the big, untradeable 2 and Noah, he's clearly our best trade chip. But that said, I think we learned from Sabean's scary interest in Rios that the Giants aren't going to be willing to enter next year with a historically bad offense-- they're too terrified that no one would show up to watch them play. As shortsighted as this trade is, at least it's Sanchez and not Lincecain. I can cope with the loss of the former for some short term relief from historical awfulness, but not the latter.
In short, I think those of you arguing that this isn't the right move because Matsui (probably) won't be on the next Giants team that competes are stubbornly correct, but given what we know of the Giants' overall philosophy, that whole 'wait 'til 2010' thing was never going to work. Realistically, this organization refuses to look at itself as in full-rebuild mode in any way, or at least to project that image to the public. I think the best we can hope for is that SF adopts the strategy to rebuild the farm system and hang onto the stud youngsters (i.e. Lincecain) we have now-- everything else is expendable to make the team not quite as putrid to watch in the interim.
In the long run, maybe that means we don't compete until 2011-2012 instead of 2010-2011, but I think that's probably a sacrifice Giants brass is willing to make for the PERCEPTION of an effort to contend. It's not something we should be thrilled at, but we'd better get used to it, because that's just the way it's going to work, I'd say.
by Smoke on the Water on
Dec 6, 2007 3:02 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Its just not a move I can get really excited about. With the limited trading chips the Giants have, they should be trying to acquire YOUNG position players, not declining ones.
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 3:11 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 2:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by mxmob33 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:17 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 2:20 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by rxmeister on
Dec 6, 2007 7:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:21 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on
Dec 6, 2007 10:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by zenbitz on
Dec 7, 2007 9:24 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 7, 2007 6:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
|
Gets it.
by zenbitz on
Dec 8, 2007 12:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 2:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 2:22 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
I thought it was all Bonds's fault that we had an old team. ;_;
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:23 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 2:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JRPhillips on
Dec 6, 2007 2:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Winn
Durham
Matsui
Molina
Aurilia
Feliz
Vizquel
SP
Anyone else's dream lineup? Sure is mine.
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:24 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by nostocksjustbonds on
Dec 6, 2007 4:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Roberts/Davis
Winn
Tejada
Masui
Sexson
Molina
Frandsen
Vizquel
smells better
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 2:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by KCE on
Dec 6, 2007 2:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by JakeS on
Dec 6, 2007 6:11 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by rxmeister on
Dec 6, 2007 7:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Meh
by orangeandblackattack on
Dec 6, 2007 2:26 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Depends on how SF feels about Lincecum
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Depends on how SF feels about Lincecum
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Depends on how SF feels about Lincecum
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 2:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 2:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
I'm very high on Correia and think he could be the best #5 in the league next season.
I like Sanchez, but don't see the same consistency and number of plus pitches. He's basically a lefty with a plus-fastball.
On a somewhat related note, I've recently been emulating Jonathan's facial hair (goatee with no mustache...something Mrs. Goofus and I affectionately call the "Filthy Sanchez" in his honor.)
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 2:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 2:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meth
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:49 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
another point
If you're going to trade a latin guy for Matsui, I think Edward James Olmos might be more fair. Shaving for those guys must be trickier than a lunar landing.
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 2:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mrs. Goofus is quite the strange one...
Nevermind.
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:49 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 3:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
Zito 244/323/ 403 BA/OBP/ SLG vs. Right handed Batters.
Lowry 277/378/425 BA/OBP/ SLG vs. Right handed Batters.
Sanchez 321/412/500 BA/OBP/ SLG vs. Right handed Batters. ( 166 Plate appearance)
Granted this is just a quick thumbnail sketch.
Zito's career numbers much better at 229/305/364.
Just for giggles Corriea is 257/320/392 vs. Right handed batters.
by daveinexile on
Dec 6, 2007 10:00 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by daveinexile on
Dec 6, 2007 10:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by Goofus on
Dec 7, 2007 9:03 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
Please don't forget to stop by the concession stand on the way out. We are running a special on rare, limited edition, Benitez Tee Shirts. They make a great stocking stuffers.
by daveinexile on
Dec 7, 2007 2:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good point..
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Meh
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 2:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 2:28 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 2:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 2:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
by Buzzword on
Dec 6, 2007 2:35 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports Sanchez for Matsui
Sorry, I just want to fit in.
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whenever he comes to bat...
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OK...
Looking at his stats, him being a lefty will probably drop his power down, probably into the high teens or around 20 HRs, although perhaps increse his triples with our alley.
Another thing, his page says he played 3B exclusively in Japanese ball. With his knees is it possible for him to move back? Is this something really common in Japanese baseball, to take a 3B and turn him into a LF/RF?
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:39 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
no one...
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:40 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: no one...
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He split time..
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: no one...
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 2:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: no one...
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:45 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess if I investigated more..
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Facts
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:45 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Why yes, yes I do.
70 were killed in a Chinese mine explosion.
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Why yes, yes I do.
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 3:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And that's the hardest news of all.
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:50 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Facts
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 2:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I add another fact?
Then there will be about 3 or 4 others that come by afterwards when we say things like...
"Roger Clemens signed with the Yankees!"
and
"Jerome Williams signed with the A's!"
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Roger Clemens signed with Jerome Williams
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 2:54 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We should sign A. Rod!
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we should sign Roger Clemens!
by nostocksjustbonds on
Dec 6, 2007 4:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Facts
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 2:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because that's what she said!
But she lied, so that's what she said but lied.
Boy I'm lame at creating any humor.
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Facts
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 3:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What?
You're good in bed? You're a woman?
Ooooooo!
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 3:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: What?
by Woody Wins on
Dec 6, 2007 4:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wait a second...
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 2:50 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
you guys are impossible!
I do NOT see why anyone would be PO'd about this trade. We had a few extra arms, we needed someone GOOD as a hitter, WE DIDN'T trade Tiny! Damn guys... you guys are impossible!"
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 2:53 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by Cookyman on
Dec 6, 2007 2:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes but to be fair...
by multiphasic on
Dec 6, 2007 3:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with some it was a pointless diary...
It's almost better for boards like this to stay smaller. Almost.
by WalrusMan on
Dec 6, 2007 3:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: I agree with some it was a pointless diary...
by Cookyman on
Dec 6, 2007 3:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: I agree with some it was a pointless diary...
Mom!!
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 3:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by Aadik on
Dec 6, 2007 2:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by Cookyman on
Dec 6, 2007 3:02 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by capnk on
Dec 6, 2007 4:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 4:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by EliminateMe on
Dec 7, 2007 11:09 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: you guys are impossible!
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 5:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and now from the NY state of mind
Scroll down to the notes thread and read it from a NY Yankees fan mindset. Expanding the deal could be interesting in the long run.
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:06 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Can this diary get any more ridiculous?
so, yes, i wouldn't mind matsui for lowry. if we aren't going to compete we at least have to pretend we tried.
by redhornet78 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:11 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
was...
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: was...
so if we do get matsui for lowry+ that means no retarded trading away of future cy young winners, right? that's another reason i'm all for the trade.
finally, is anyone else going to this thing tonight? my roommate said it has something to do with "the dark knight"...
http://www.whysoserious.com/steprightup/register.aspx
it's not showing in the bay area but we're going to the l.a. show... if it's something special i'll post it later in this off-the-wall diary.
by redhornet78 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Can this diary get any more ridiculous?
I'll probably still go see it for Daniel Craig, but lol.
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 3:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Can this diary get any more ridiculous?
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 3:18 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Can this diary get any more ridiculous?
by Cookyman on
Dec 6, 2007 3:21 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Can this diary get any more ridiculous?
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 3:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Can this diary get any more ridiculous?
by JRPhillips on
Dec 6, 2007 3:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Attention Statheads
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:15 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Attention Statheads
by Cookyman on
Dec 6, 2007 3:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
arbitrary...
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: arbitrary...
by southcitysteve on
Dec 6, 2007 3:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: arbitrary...
by Cookyman on
Dec 6, 2007 3:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Carloz Gomez's value >>>> Matsui's
by awesomer on
Dec 6, 2007 3:17 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
3:45 p.m., from Jayson Stark
* A source says the Giants did call the Yankees about Hideki Matsui. They're offering their starting pitchers (Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain or Noah Lowry) for bats, but they are just exploring to see if there is a match. Matsui has a full no-trade clause, and it isn't known whether he would waive it to go to San Francisco or anywhere else.
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:17 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
lol..
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 3:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Expand the deal
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Expand the deal
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 3:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on
Dec 6, 2007 3:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by Lincecain on
Dec 6, 2007 3:24 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 3:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by JRPhillips on
Dec 6, 2007 3:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by UnleashTheGore on
Dec 6, 2007 3:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by mxmob33 on
Dec 6, 2007 3:30 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by Skaldheim on
Dec 6, 2007 3:37 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
That said, unless it's a trade I personally agree with and support, I'd rather not find out.
by jponry on
Dec 6, 2007 3:37 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
Do you think Dirty had enough opportunities in a defined role to see if he sticks?
by WilltheThrill on
Dec 6, 2007 3:31 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
I don't see how we are going to suddenly get a raft of young guys that can hit, and will be ML ready in 2-3 years.
The only reason to stay away from guys like Matsui is to spend the money elsewhere. I don't see how 13M/2 years can be spent on anything that helps the team in 2010. I mean, teams won't just sell you their prospects.
That being said, what I don't like about Godzilla is that he's really not that good (although immediatly becomes best hitting on the Giants), might decline fast, and plays OF. Plus Sanchez has some significant upside.
This is a good move only if you have lost faith in Sanchez becoming an ace reliever or solid starter.
by zenbitz on
Dec 6, 2007 3:36 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by Buzzword on
Dec 6, 2007 3:43 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by UnleashTheGore on
Dec 6, 2007 3:45 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by DaStick on
Dec 6, 2007 4:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
His questions for Sabean and Steve Young are generally pretty well thought out and bring back some decent responses. Young is a pretty open book, but Sabean isn't. Besides, I've said it before and I'll say it again: Ralph vs. Sabean is some of the best 20 minutes of talk radio there is.
by sfgfan on
Dec 6, 2007 3:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
I'd appreciate Ralph's provoking questions more if:
- They didn't take forever
- He wasn't more interested in working his own opinion into the question than hearing what his guest's answer is
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 4:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
by sfgfan on
Dec 7, 2007 9:44 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
Ralph and Tom's reaction? Jay who? How can we expect these guys to properly analyze a major trade when they don't even know who the minor league player of the year was? Ok, the average fan probably won't know, but these guys are supposed to be "professionals."
by nostocksjustbonds on
Dec 6, 2007 5:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: WFAN reports possible (edit: kenshin) Sanchez
Goofus pointed out that Ralph "thinks" he knows about baseball. I get the same impression. Just because he's on the radio doesn't mean a thing. You either know your subject or bring on an expert that does. Listerners will trust you more if your honest with them and not be a blowhard.
For the life of me, with all the money Ralph makes (good for him and his family) you would have thought he would have gone to a speech therapist for that lateral lisp.
But what I really think bothers me more than anything is they can't seem to leave there egos in the airlock to the studio.
The two of them should get down on their hands and knees every morning and thank the radio gods they have a job.
by Buzzword on
Dec 6, 2007 5:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well,
by scotterduder on
Dec 6, 2007 3:57 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Mentioned on MLB.com now:
Doesn't mean that anything will actually happen though.
by Natto on
Dec 6, 2007 4:15 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
If it goes down, any chance we could move to 1B?
As much as I really do like Ort, and wouldn't mind if he were our 1b, if we get Matsui, I'd rather see him at first, Winn in Center, Nate in Right and Lewis/Davis/Ort/Roberts(gag) in left.
by Andy from DC on
Dec 6, 2007 4:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: If it goes down, any chance we could move to
by kennv on
Dec 7, 2007 7:28 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
I wonder if there's any deal the Yankees would do that would be worth Cain or Lincecum.
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 4:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 4:39 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
by Goofus on
Dec 6, 2007 4:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
link to Marquez: http://pinstripespa.blogspot.com/2007/10/top-10-prospects-8-jeff-marquez.html
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/M/Jeff-Marquez-1.shtml
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 4:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
we...:
We will not get an offer anywhere near the Santana package from the yanks.
by kenshin1 on
Dec 6, 2007 4:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Understandable
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 5:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Understandable
by nostocksjustbonds on
Dec 6, 2007 5:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Understandable
by wilriv21 on
Dec 6, 2007 5:19 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
by denny on
Dec 6, 2007 8:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
by Smoke on the Water on
Dec 6, 2007 9:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
I'm not shocked to see what you guys are saying. Is it realistic? No, but neither are we. It's just natural for fans to overhype their own players, especially the young ones (most of us didn't want Johan if it cost us Hughes).
Now, of course, somewhere between the hysteria on this site, and our sites lays the truth: Matsui isn't a superstar, and Lincecum and Cain aren't the best young pitchers in baseball. Matsui is a very good hitter and marketing dream; and Lincecum and Cain aren't the next coming of Clemens (in fact, we're debating where either would fit in the rotation, with Hughes, Chamberlain, Wang, Pettitte, and Kennedy already slotted; probably #4 slot). Factoring everything in, I think a package of Matsui, Tabata or Jackson, and Horne is more than fair for Cain.
by denny on
Dec 6, 2007 9:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Mentioned on MLB.com now:
June 12 vs. TOR 6 IP, 4 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 4 BB, 5 SO
June 24 vs. NYY 5.2 IP, 2 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 5 BB, 2 SO
And as far as your proposed Matsui, Tabata or Jackson & and Horne for Cain trade. Dream on. The Giatns wouldn't do that for Lincecum let alone Cain, they're looking for position players who would be ready to play in 08'. Not players like Tabata or Jackson who are still years away from playing.
by Cainer on
Dec 6, 2007 10:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cain/Lincecum vs. Hughes/Chamberlain
August 26, 2007
Which team's young pitching combination do you like better, the Yankees' Phil Hughes and Joba Chamberlain or the Giants' Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum?
D.J. Kennedy
Anaheim
D.J. has mentioned four of the very best young pitchers in the big leagues. Cain consistently has spun quality starts since breaking into the majors two years ago at age 20. Lincecum and Chamberlain had the best 1-2 combination of pitches in the 2006 draft and needed precious little minor league time before enjoying immediate success in the bigs. I ranked Hughes as the best pitching prospect in the minors entering the season--and his pure stuff isn't as good as that of the other three guys.
Separating prospects like this basically comes down to nitpicking. I'll take the San Francisco duo, because Cain has proven more in the majors more quickly than Hughes, and because Lincecum's long-term health is a safer bet than Chamberlain's. A number of teams passed on Chamberlain in the 2006 draft because they couldn't get medical clearance on the long-term health of his left knee.
That said, New York's pitching future is in good hands with Hughes and Chamberlain. If the Giants have the best pair of pitchers who are 23 or younger, the Yankees very may well have the second-best duo.
by Cainer on
Dec 6, 2007 10:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs



