Some interesting defensive data...
MGL has posted the top three and bottom three at each position in terms of UZR... a few Giants showed up on both lists.
http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/article/best_and_worst_of_2007_uzr/
The Good:
Vizquel - +16 (3rd best shortstop)
Feliz - +28 (best third baseman)
Winn - +7 (third best NL RF)
The Bad:
Bonds - -23 (3rd worst NL LF)
Roberts - -26 (worst CF in the majors!)
http://jinaz-reds.blogspot.com/2007/10/2007-fielding-data.html
A dude named JinAZ has also posted some defensive ratings, based on THT's RZR. Notable Giants numbers:
Klesko - -4
Ortmeier - +5.1
Durham - -12.1 (owch)
Frandsen - -0.1 (as a 2b)
Feliz - +28.6 (damn, he's good)
Vizquel - +12.9
Bonds - -2.3 (not so bad here)
Roberts - -5.2 (as a CF)
Davis - -1.9 (as a CF)
Winn - +7.0 (as a RF)
Schierholtz - +4.5
Any thoughts? It looks pretty clear that Dave Roberts needs to not start in CF next year... (with his offense... that signing's looking pretty bad to me right now.)
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
I didn't think Roberts would be that bad in CF, yikes. In 2006 he played mostly LF for the Padres and had a very nice rating, definitely way into the positive side of things, but its unfortunate to have to play him there because his bat is so weak for a LF.
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
wow.
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
by sup3rk1ng on Oct 3, 2007 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Succumb to the Enchanted t-shirt! Adopted dad of Minor Izzy
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
The THT RZR data which is
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Really?
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
I just included them to be complete.
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Oh well.
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
If they could move Roberts, I'd like these lineups:
Vs. LHP:
Winn - LF
Davis - CF
Schierholtz - RF
Vs. RHP
Lewis - LF
Winn - CF
Schierholtz - RF
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
I'm hoping Freddie can play well enough defensively in center to play there though. Randy is really a left fielder. He plays the corners better than center, and his arm is far less exposed in left than right.
I could see Dan Ortmeier platooning with Nate in right. Dan hit righties better than lefties with the Giants this year, but over his minor league career I believe he hit lefties better.
If the Giants could somehow get a REAL bat in left field, I could be reasonably satisfied with platoons of Davis and Lewis in center and Schierholtz and Ortmeier in right. That would presumedly mean that the Giants had traded Dave Roberts and Winn. Randy has probably grown into his salary and if his limited no-trade could be worked around, might bring a bit in return. Dave hasn't yet grown into his salary and likely would need the Giants to pick some of it up in order to be dealt.
Regarding Ortmeier, the Giants appeared to be grooming him for first base. But I doubt he'll hit well enough to be an everyday corner outfielder, let alone an everyday first baseman.
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
The metrics use different sources
UZR uses data from Stats Inc.
THT's RZR and Dewan's +/- use data from BIS.
Re: Some interesting defensive data...
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Oct 4, 2007 11:23 AM PDT reply actions

by 



















