Julian Tavarez is attractive
There isn't much of a difference between this year and last, at least as far as the down months go. For some reason, I thought I was running out of ideas just this season, and last year I was effortlessly cranking posts out. Trying to reconcile the difference between the two, I went digging through the archives of this site. Around this time last year, I wrote a piece about the top-5 Mike LaCoss cards that were on eBay at the time. That made me feel better, both then and now. The period between the holidays and pitchers and catchers reporting is always going to be torture to the baseball nerd.
The scraps of winter league news aren't ever going to be of a meaningful sample size to do anything more than reinforce existing prejudices, either. Pedro Feliz sucking a basketball through a straw in a winter league doesn't anyone any favors. I might have to use some meager ad revenue to purchase a URL, but that's about the only ramification. It did bring to mind, though, just how off people -- professional media and fans alike -- can be about certain players. Pedro Feliz is an RBI guy; he has a little gold nameplate and everything. He drives in runs. Hey, my name is Pedro Feliz, and I drive in runs. Pedro Feliz is an RBI guy.
Problem is, he stinks. He gets more opportunities with runners on base than the rest of the team, converts them at a ridiculously low percentage, but still winds up with close to 100 RBI. Because he is forever coming close to that shiny three-digit number, he's an RBI guy. "It remains to be seen how the Giants would respond if they fail to re-sign Pedro Feliz. He's an RBI guy."
This also brings to mind the recent Warriors trade. Troy Murphy was a double-digit rebounder. A double-digit rebounder! How could the Warriors give up a double/double guy? Crazy! There go those Warriors again, always messing up...wait, did they just trade dead-eye shooter Mike Dunleavy too? My goodness, the Warriors just traded a great rebounder and a dead-eye shooter! Where is the offense going to come from now that Dunleavy isn't going to be draining open mid-range shots from the wing? Where are the rebounds now that elbow-throwing ogre Troy Murphy isn't muscling down the boards? If you don't follow the NBA, just know that those descriptions are akin to bemoaning a loss of triples with Steve Finley not on the roster.
There are just players who fall in some weird miscategorization vortex. Kirk Rueter knew how to win...until he didn't. Felix Rodriguez in his prime was great, but you couldn't leave him in to face lefties. Consider this an open thread to celebrate the miscategorized and mislabeled throughout sports.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
D
If your perceptive peeve becomes broadcast law...
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
I almost barfed when David Eckstein won WS MVP. For weeks all I could hear was scrappy, gritty, and heart!
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Sure he's an innings eater, but is this really a compliment when he's giving up 5,6,7 runings in 8 or 9 innings?
by April3rdLifeBegins on Jan 29, 2007 9:34 AM PST reply actions
Barnyard animals on the Fat Farm
Oh, he's out of control. He's starting to eat innings, too?
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 29, 2007 10:27 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 29, 2007 5:19 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by E Ticket on Jan 29, 2007 6:41 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
In 2004, he knew he had to pitch just as well or not get a good contract as a free agent, so he had a good 2004.
In 2005, after securing his good contract, he was able to keep interested in pitching for the first half of 2005, with a 3.48 ERA, 1.41 WHIP, but couldn't keep his interest up and ended with a 4.58 ERA, 1.46 WHIP.
In 2006, with nothing at stake, he had a 5.34 ERA, 1.56 WHIP with Washington, but after getting traded to Arizona, it woke him up and he had a 3.76 ERA, 1.39 WHIP.
So he was only really good from mid-2003 to mid 2005.
Given that he will be a free agent in 2008, the D-backs probably can count on him to be interested enough to pitch well for most of the season, but woe to any team signing him to a 5+ year contract, which appears to be in his range if he can just get his fat ass up enough to pitch well and convince some team that the real Livan is the 2003-2004 version, not the 2005-2006 version.
He has to be salivating, like Templeton at the county fair, after seeing Meche get 5 years at $55M for that mediocrity, when Livan can be downright dominating when he puts his mind to it. Whoever gets him can expect an OK 2008, but 2009, 10, 11, not so OK, before he wakes himself up again in 2012 and fools the next construction worker who thinks he can make a fortune on that singing fat toad.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 29, 2007 5:37 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
And you want a sandwich. With olives. And ham. Werido.
by howtheyscored on Jan 30, 2007 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by howtheyscored on Jan 30, 2007 2:25 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
I readily admit I'm reading tea-leaves. But I think most of us have read enough about Livan and his lazy-ass mental attitude to see that my supposition makes sense. He always had the talent to do well while with the Giants, the only problem was coaxing it out of him. The Giants finally gave up on that. But given his pattern of pitching well when something is at stake - I left out how well he pitched for the Giants that one season before we gave him that long contract, upon which he then sat back down his fat ass again - it all makes sense.
Plus, any baseball player who don't understand why fans are mad about his game 7 performance and points out that without his good performances before that, there would not have been a 7th game, is just plain clueless and gutless (in heart, not body; he has a huge gut in that case) and not worth keeping.
I'm guessing you think the Sharks blew it, losing a win with that last minute goal given up and then losing the shoot out in OT, but I will note that Cheechoo will start playing like he did last season and put the team into turbo scoring mode, so don't worry.
And you are wondering how the Warriors can make the playoffs after getting blown out by the Cavaliers without Lebron, but the Cavs have one of the best home records in the NBA, so it is not all Lebron, all the time, and it is clear that a number of Warriors were fighting the flu, so don't worry, with Harrington in place and Richardson coming soon, the Warriors will be able to pull themselves into a playoff spot. :^)
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 31, 2007 4:16 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
See also, Nichols' Law of Catcher Defense
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive

Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Don't forget, Livan is a "big game pitcher."
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
that one turned out well for the giants...
by April3rdLifeBegins on Jan 29, 2007 11:15 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
All-encompasing baseball cliche: "Does the little things that don't show up in the box score." This is usually followed by the only two examples known to mankind: (1) move runners over with less than two out, (2) take a lot of pitches and work the count deep. You know, "stuff that doesn't show up in the box score."
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
- Advancing a base when a throw goes to another base
- Stretching a single to a double (yes it's scored a double, but what doesn't show was the effort and alert baserunning it required.)
- Taking away errors by teammates with extra effort (Hello, JT)
- Catchers taking away a wild pitch
- Extra effort to get a lead runner out (like Omar's throw to 3rd last year)
- Getting in a pitcher's head with the threat to steal (hello Ricky Henderson)
- successfully deaking a baserunner into not advancing
Those are all items
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Hustling on everything put in play, therefore putting more pressure on the defender to make hurry the play, therefore increasing the likliehood of an error.
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by candymanhackman on Jan 29, 2007 1:17 PM PST reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
It's like an excuse to waste money.
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by amoose on Jan 29, 2007 4:31 PM PST up reply actions
I do believe...
by lyricalkiller on Jan 29, 2007 5:34 PM PST up reply actions
Re: I do believe...
Remember... the cries for a Proven Closer were pretty loud after a brutal bullpen cost them the division in 2004. (29 blown saves and 29 relief losses, compared to 22 blown saves and 24 relief losses in 2006.) If the bullpen struggles again, you can expect the same cries next winter.
Upside
by DiegoGiant on Jan 29, 2007 3:38 PM PST reply actions
Re: Upside
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 29, 2007 4:07 PM PST up reply actions
Old Age Creeps Down on You
For support, I suggest a butt bra.
Re: Old Age Creeps Down on You
by E Ticket on Jan 29, 2007 6:44 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Upside
As for the topic, is Grant suggesting that stats can be misleading? How shocking.
Sperm Bank's gotta be full by now
At least they finally took the milking machine off his John Henry.
Re: Upside
Re: Upside
Read...and enjoy.
Ignore the home runs, doubles and walks
All-around hitter? What the hell does that mean? Is he the hitting equivalent of Vladimir Nabokov, who wrote brilliantly in three languages? I hate that term, all-around hitter.
Yeah, fuck you too Placido Polanco.
Re: Ignore the home runs, doubles and walks
Re: Ignore the home runs, doubles and walks
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 30, 2007 1:18 PM PST up reply actions
Run into the ground:-
Michael Vick "changes the way the defence thinks."
Emile Heskey "does so much for the team that you don't see." (notice that even his supporters in the media can't find anything specific to hang their hats on)
Re: Run into the ground:-
Howay the lads !
by PacBellBoozer on Jan 30, 2007 8:48 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by VidaWantsYourCar on Jan 29, 2007 6:24 PM PST reply actions
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
Re: Julian Tavarez is attractive
by GiantJim on Jan 30, 2007 10:49 AM PST reply actions

by 



















