Dan Wetzel is still useless
I'm going to take a break from the AL East predictions - no tears, please - to address something that bugs me. This is somewhat of a Giants issue, but it is more of a life lesson I wish to impart on you all. So allow me to teach profound nuggets of wisdom, allow me to free your mind, and allow me to climb on your metaphorical back to direct you through Dagobah Swamp. This first course is free.
There is nothing inherently wrong with San Francisco baseball fans. Breathe it in. Repeat it. There is nothing inherently wrong with San Francisco baseball fans. There is no societal or communal groupthink that makes us cheer for Barry Bonds. It seems obvious to point out. A double helix of idiocy will not be discovered in a Southern California lab while mapping out the Giants fan genome. There is nothing inherently wrong with San Francisco baseball fans.
Still, we'll all need to be prepared for the yammering from pundits, opposing fans, and talk radio goofs. On April 6th, Barry Bonds is going to get a standing ovation. It will last for a while. The next time Barry Bonds has a multi-homer game, he'll get a standing ovation. When Bonds passes Babe Ruth, he'll get a standing ovation. And the goofs will have a field day. Giants fans are ignorant sub-human pig men and pig women; film at 11, public flogging at 11:30.
There are hundreds of reasons why we cheer for Bonds. It's hard to just turn off an appreciation of a spectacular talent. Some of the best memories in our lives will have come at the ballpark, and one man has given us the bulk of these memories. If you want to get into the nuts and bolts of it all, Bonds has triggered some sort of pleasure chemical in all of our brains, and has done it about 6,000 times over the past decade-plus. That's why we keep coming back for more.
If Barry Bonds were on another team, he would be supported by a whole different group of fans. It kills me to hear the occasional A's fan tear into Bonds, and start with the asterisk nonsense. I'll concede the asterisk if they agree to call the '89 Series a tie due to Jose Canseco's admitted juicing, which is also a ridiculous argument. Not to mention, if Mark McGwire doesn't take peformance-enhancing drugs, he might have garnered less value back in trade. And then the A's wouldn't have been able to get Blake Stein. What the hell would they have done then, I ask? Every team has had players taking some sort of drugs, and every fan has cheered on better winning through chemistry. Asterisks and revisionist histories only serve to obscure the issue.
On the other end of the spectrum, if Bonds were a Dodger I don't think I would have stopped giggling at his problems yet. That's just how it is. When people start taking sports rivalries a little too seriously, it helps to utter the phrase, "There, but for the grace of geography, go I." The selection of a favorite sports team is ridiculously arbitrary. That will never take away the thrill of a championship win, or the sting when the Dodgers dispatch the Giants in an important game. Still, all of the pseudo-religious imagery about the Dodgers - the t-shirts, the "Dodgers are evil" bit - it's all just a wee bit tongue-in-cheek. But while I would roll around in Dodger misfortune if the roles were reversed, I certainly hope I wouldn't start making blanket statements about the nature of the Southern Californian baseball fan. Tongue-sorta-in-cheek evil, yes. Completely ignorant human beings, no.
You will always hear about regional differences between fans, and they shouldn't be completely dismissed. Philly fans have the reputation of being very, uh, vocal with their disapproval, and Cardinal fans have the reputation of being some sort of pure baseball superfans, sprinkled with pure superfan fairy dust. Atlanta fans don't buy first round playoff tickets, and Dodger fans show up late and leave early. There might be kernels of truth in all of those stereotypes, but they are all also overblown. Rooting for a fallen hero transcends all of that. Fans of every team, in every city, would cheer Barry Bonds if the situations were reversed. If you think differently, you are probably a zealot in your political, spiritual, and personal life as well, and I ask that you do not breed. Thank you.
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by MeSoKrabby on Mar 21, 2006 1:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by out machine on Mar 21, 2006 1:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Zealots
by hammystyle on Mar 21, 2006 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Zealots
by out machine on Mar 21, 2006 2:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by nick on Mar 21, 2006 1:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
Barry Bonds was a PED user in an era filled with them. Sure, his numbers are inflated, but so were the batting averages in the 19th and early 20th Centuries, and the ERAs in the '60s were deflated. We know that comparing him to Ruth isn't possible, but we also know that he's still by far the best of this era, and dammit, he plays for the Giants.
So in the end, his 700+ homers won't be as impressive as Babe Ruth's or Hank Aaron's, when adjusted for context. I can live with that.
by Skaldheim on Mar 21, 2006 2:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by Punch Rockgroin on Mar 21, 2006 2:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by WalrusMan on Mar 21, 2006 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
Well, physically, no. But mentally? Who else would wear that Dodger angel-wing shirt? Only a Giants fan. And in this Giants fan's case - him and his mother.
What that has to do with BB? I dunno - but don't go around calling us sane.
by zenbitz on Mar 21, 2006 2:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by Sayhey on Mar 21, 2006 3:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
I pretend anti-Giants pundits don't exist. It's a nice little world.
by tk on Mar 21, 2006 4:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Baseball Fan Stereotypes
Yankees - Thin skinned
Red Sox - Persectution complex
Devil Rays - Imaginary
Athletics - Inferiority complex
Mariners - Coffee addicted
Rangers - Rednecks
Giants - Steroid apologists
Dodgers - Smog loving, come late, leave early, evil, uninspired
Cardinals - "Best Fans in America"
Cubs - Masochist
Reds - Gambling apologists
Braves - Uninterested
Marlins - Shit on
Mets - self-centered
Phillies - Rude, mean
by The Balls of Summer on Mar 21, 2006 4:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
by EliminateMe on Mar 21, 2006 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
by tk on Mar 21, 2006 7:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
by Kitspool on Mar 21, 2006 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
by danieljgrant on Mar 22, 2006 12:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
Red Sox - Brokeback Cowboy Ups and Fucking Idiots
Devil Rays - Empty Seats
Athletics - No There, There
Mariners - Yuppie Frappe Cocksuckers
Rangers - Pick up women at Family Reunions
Giants - Stink of Garlic Fries--Awesome Nevertheless
Dodgers - Celebrity Pukes, Posers, Pissants
Cardinals - "I'm With Stupid" Night
Royals - "I'm With Stupid Tew" Night
Cubs - Jeff Gordon Rules All
Reds - "Marge Shott Night Free swastikas
Braves - Celebrate Cinco de Marcho in June
Marlins - Shit on (deservedly so)
Mets - Tom Seaver pitched here once upon a time
Phillies - "I killed Stupid"
Astros - Minute Maid? ...says it all
Angels - Angel Fans of Beverly Hills of 90210
Pirates - How bout them Steelers
White Sox - Da Bears
Twins - Ya Vert der MintieSodta Baggie Doerme
DBacks - 162 days and nights of boredom
Padres - Like dood, where's my seat?
Indians - They're Still Shitty
Blue Jays - Fucking Foreigners
Orioles - SpendSpendSpend-NothingNothingNothing
Rockies - We Can Kick Fresno's Ass
Nationals - Next stop--Havana
Detroit - "I am Stupid"
Milwaukee - All the women fans look like Bud Selig
by E Ticket on Mar 22, 2006 12:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
by seyheystretch on Mar 22, 2006 8:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball Fan Stereotypes
by Aadik on Mar 22, 2006 3:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by wjackalope on Mar 21, 2006 5:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by NearestNorwich on Mar 21, 2006 7:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Excellent.
by Dan from NM on Mar 21, 2006 7:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by Poe on Mar 21, 2006 9:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
*Not actual translation
by danieljgrant on Mar 22, 2006 12:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I plead ignorance
by Lyle on Mar 22, 2006 6:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: I plead ignorance
From the WTFGAS unabridged dictionary of Useless Definitions.
n. a splattering of spermetazoa left upon a crackhouse wall following coitus between two media weasals
v. to wetzel. to splatter one's self upon a crack house wall, while copulating one's self, another wetzel, or a sheep
by E Ticket on Mar 22, 2006 9:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I plead ignorance
by Grant on Mar 22, 2006 9:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I plead ignorance
by Lyle on Mar 22, 2006 10:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
by Grant on Mar 22, 2006 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't forget
it takes a special kind of person to recycle a line that was not that well written in the first place, twice in 6 months. clearly mr. wetzel loves his own voice, and clearly, he would treat his godfather with more respect.
question is, why do idiots get the lion's share of publicity in our society (i.e. bill o'reilly, mike celizic, skip bayless, anne coulteir - that bitch)? who is paying these people for their opinions, and why does ANYONE listen to them?
here's to our collectively lowered expectations when it comes to journalism.
thanks for your humor, and ::gasp:: intellegence, grant.
by walkerianc on Mar 22, 2006 11:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
Yankee Fans - Can't understand that other teams can technically win world series
Mets Fans - Hapless
by zenbitz on Mar 22, 2006 9:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by Aadik on Mar 22, 2006 3:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
by scarface on Mar 22, 2006 7:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Dan Wetzel is still useless
And Grant, spot-on. Which you seem to be kinda always.
I wish more bloggers would follow your lead in NOT linking to useless writers. Links are publicity on the net.
by scarface on Mar 22, 2006 7:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
God bless ya, Grant
I thank you for that.
by Pants Man on Mar 23, 2006 9:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















