Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Title

Last night was another game with nothing of interest:

  1. Jamey Wright is still a fifth starter.
  2. Eliezer Alfonzo is still hitting like someone that wants to collect a pension.
  3. The Giants can struggle to score runs, even at Coors Field.
  4. I'm with Ken Macha. We need to get a Dateline crew on that humidor. I get the feeling the scale at my local deli is regulated more closely.
  5. I don't really think the humidor is being used unfairly, but it'd be fun to blame the offensive woes on something other than a gaggle of mediocre players.
And that's the only real issue with this team: mediocre players. Some days they're better than mediocre, some days they're worse, and it all evens out in the end. I can't imagine a better example of a .500 team. No one's really tanking it. No one's really hitting or pitching above what you'd expect. It could be worse; they could be a bad team. Some teams would kill for mediocre.

Which brings today's comment starter, though it's actually more of a roll call. Heck, I'll even put one of those newfangled polls in the comments section. The question is this: Are the playoffs are enough of a crapshoot that a mediocre team can win the World Series?

I've always been of that mind. Get in the playoffs, and let the microdynamics of baseball take over. Remember Noah Lowry's run in August last year? There could be two Giant pitchers who do that in October. Edgardo Alfonzo hit .359/.457/.538 last April. Lance Niekro could do better in a stretch of fifteen games. Anyone can. That's kind of the point.

This isn't to completely remove talent from the equation. A .600 team will beat a .500 more often than not, but not that much more often. Not often enough to stop trying to get in the playoffs, and not often enough to completely dismiss the chance of fluky success once a team is in.

I'm not really revealing the structure of the double helix for the first time; this stuff has all been hashed out on better sites than this. But I wanted to see where the denizens here stood on the issue. I'm not willing to part with Matt Cain or Jonathan Sanchez for a minor upgrade or rental, and it would be a terrible idea to trade players like Marcus Sanders, Travis Ishikawa, and Nate Schierholtz when their value has dropped so low.  This isn't the season to completely mortgage the future.

However, as long as the Giants are just a couple of games back, I think it's silly to call for trading away Vizquel or Schmidt. I want in the playoffs, and I want the rest of the baseball-loving world to shake their head in disgust. "Eight RBI for Jason Ellison in Game Seven? Didn't see that coming...." Maybe it's irrational optimism, but I can't remember a time when following this team was rational. Like, the '60s, or something?

Poll
Struggling to get a mediocre team in the playoffs: Worth it?
Yes
30 votes
No
11 votes

41 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Title
For once, the Giants might actually have a team set up for the playoffs:

3 Good starters, decent bench.

Also, we might be a .515 team with Alou and Bonds in the lineup.

by zenbitz on Jul 6, 2006 11:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
DECENT BENCH!?!?!?!?!

Vizcaino and Ellison are probably two of the most worthless players in all of baseball, and they're the most heavily used players on the bench.  

Even with everyone healthy and Finley on the bench, I still wouldn't call it anything other than mediocre.

by ololo3 on Jul 6, 2006 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
OK, We have 4 decent OFs when healthy.
Sweeney/Nierko both make decent PHs... just can't start.

Since we have 2 CFs and Ellison's defense has been a little shakey - I would dump him and call up Todd Linden.

Vizcaino is better than:

Shawon Duston
Charlie Hayes
Neifi Perez
Shinjo!

He's the backup MI for pete's sake.

I think the "when healthy" part is key.  This team goes no where in the playoffs w/out Bonds+Alou.

Also, in my little world, we get someone who can hit to play first.

by zenbitz on Jul 6, 2006 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Just to be clear, NO WAY is Vizcaino better than Charlie Hayes.

by dangjackson on Jul 6, 2006 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Vizcaino can play shortstop.

by zenbitz on Jul 6, 2006 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Best thing about Charlie Hayes: his at-bat song was We Be Clubbin'
"Do you want to know the terrifying truth, or do you want to see me sock a few dingers?" Mark McGwire

by MeSoKrabby on Jul 6, 2006 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
>Vizcaino is better than Charlie Hayes

If you were Todd Stottlemyre, I'd punch you for saying that.

Me gustan tomar mis copas / Aguardiente es lo mejor / También la tequila blanca / Con su sal le da sabor

by leftymalo on Jul 6, 2006 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Anybody who charges the mound from second base is better than Jose Vizcaino.
"Why you gotta be cardin' my hos?" - Charlie Hayes

by stevieg on Jul 6, 2006 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Nice reference, who could ever forget that run in with Stottlemeyer?  Randy Johnson slapping on the Giants cap, then trying to set it back down like nobody would notice.  The best part about that was that the ball was still live and Charlie was rounding second headed to third when he decided to make the hard left instead of the soft one.

Between the bird and the cap "the ugly" is involved in two of my favorite dozen baseball memories.

"San Diego, which of course in German means a whale's vagina" - Ron Burgundy

by W8ingForATitle on Jul 6, 2006 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Theoretically, I do think the playoffs are enough of a crap shoot that anyone could win it all if they get in.  Every season, there are huge surprises - just look at the Marlins.  They're not the best team in baseball or anything, but they're respectable, and their entire payroll is about the price of a grand-slam breakfast at Denny's (no pun intended).  I don't think anyone in their right mind expected them to be anything more than horrendous.

Same goes for the playoffs.  As Grant pointed out, anyone can get hot at any time and go on a run.  The Giants usually are better in the second half of the year than the first half, but they've never had a team THIS old before...  If they make it to the postseason, they've got a shot, but every time I watch a game, I just find it very difficult to imagine THIS team actually winning it all.  The team has been the definition of mediocrity for an entire half, and mediocrity of this magnitude, I dunno.  It's tough to imagine them even going on a big winning streak during the season, let alone making or getting results in the postseason...

by ololo3 on Jul 6, 2006 11:45 AM PDT reply actions  

IF we sneak into the playoffs
There are some things working in our favor.  First, we have a front line ace that, if on his A-game can carry us through a five game series by winning two.  Second, the fear of making mistakes on a large stage is enough to ensure Barry an OBP near .600, whixh will allow mediocre several chances to cash in.

Other than that I don't see too many advantages IF we sneak in.  I agree that anything can happen and point to Mark Lemke as Exhibit A.  The Giants could certainly help their cause by adding a Craig Wilson to the mix, but the ifs, ands, and buts are too numerous to consider giving much in the way of trade...not that we have a hell of a lot to offer anyways.

I'd like the Giants to hang on to their tradeable pieces and see if they don't just prove me wrong, but I'd also like to see what a Schmidt and others would return in prospects before I make that statement conclusive.    

"San Diego, which of course in German means a whale's vagina" - Ron Burgundy

by W8ingForATitle on Jul 6, 2006 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: IF we sneak into the playoffs
If God came down and replayed the 2005 playoffs 100 times, San Diego doesn't win the World Series in any of them (and only 16 times does an NL team actually win a World Series game).

by Roger on Jul 6, 2006 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: IF we sneak into the playoffs
I seem to recall that the White Sox barely won each of the four World Series games.  It was least dominant sweep I have ever seen.

by Skaldheim on Jul 6, 2006 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: IF we sneak into the playoffs
Indeed, but a sweep is a sweep is a sweep. And given that 1) that's two sweeps in a row, and 2) the NL has exactly one team that can claim to be "better than mediocre" (which I believe is the official Mets slogan this year), it seemed an obvious joke to make.

The part about the Padres was serious, though.

by Roger on Jul 6, 2006 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: IF we sneak into the playoffs
I hope God has better things to do, like punish sinful cities with hurricanes and floods.
Me gustan tomar mis copas / Aguardiente es lo mejor / También la tequila blanca / Con su sal le da sabor

by leftymalo on Jul 6, 2006 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: IF we sneak into the playoffs
In theory, you and I should have better things to do than follow this team so obsessively, too. But if God wanted me to be productive he shouldn't have invented baseball or the internet.

by Roger on Jul 6, 2006 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
I think the playoffs are somewhat of a crapshoot, but without at least two good starters, your hope of doing anything is next to none.
Today's Spanish lesson: Como se dice "Blown save?" "Armando Benitez?" "Correctamundo!"

by Goofus on Jul 6, 2006 11:54 AM PDT reply actions  

You need more than 2 good starters...
...to win in the playoffs. You need a good/great and reliable bullpen that can handle pressure situations. The Giants' bullpen is anything but and even our good young arms are probably too green to handle playoff pressure, I'm sorry to say.
FIRE FLIPPY NOW!

by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2006 12:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: You need more than 2 good starters...
Perhaps I wasn't clear.  What I meant was that to have any hope at all, you need to have 2 good starteers.  I'm not saying I'd be excited to go to war with a less than stellar bullpen, but it's not something that's necessarily gonna dash all hopes.

Said another way, if you have two starters and plenty of offense/defense, you'd still have a puncher's chance of making some noise, even with a sub-standard bullpen.

Today's Spanish lesson: Como se dice "Blown save?" "Armando Benitez?" "Correctamundo!"

by Goofus on Jul 6, 2006 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
The flip side of the "anything can happen!" coin is that the team will play just as mediocre-ally as they've played all year.  Expecting overachievement from guys like Worrell, Herges, Benard, Rios, Niekro, Matheny, etc., has not helped the Giants' success rate over the last decade or so.

After getting swept by the Mets in the first round of the playoffs, folks like me will bitch about how being in the hunt in July and winning the wildcard was in fact a curse, as the team didn't do anything to make itself better in 2007 and future years (eg, trade for the young talent of which the farm system is bereft).

World Series or bust... and I don't see this team winning the 2006 World Series unless there is a horrible gardening accident involving all the other NL playoff teams and the AL pennant winner.

by Cleophus on Jul 6, 2006 1:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
The Giants are not streaky, which may be very beneficial in the series.  Play 500 ball for the first 6 games and hope for a little luck or a Jason Schmidt gem in game 7.

by allfrank on Jul 6, 2006 1:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
Of course the playoffs are a crapshoot.

You put in pieces of CRAP like Felix Rodriguez and watch balls SHOOT over the fence.

Mighty Casey would have taken Felix Rodriguez deep.

by Stuttering John Tamargo on Jul 6, 2006 1:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
It pains me to discuss playoffs like this when there are three teams in first place in our division and the Giants ain't one of them.
We can make moves before the trading deadline, but the other teams might be making moves too, no?
"It's like you're unraveling a big cable-knit sweater that someone keeps knitting and knitting and knitting and knitting..." -Pee Wee Herman

by WithTechron on Jul 6, 2006 1:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Crapshoot this
I'm only comfortable with the crapshoot analogy if it extends to the point that recognizes some coming out rolls are better than others.  The Giants have no shot at a point of 6 or 8.

Schmidt and Bonds would have to be dominant.  I can't see trading any truly useful future talent just for a shot at this one.

by achiappanza on Jul 6, 2006 1:49 PM PDT reply actions  

If we can bundle up guys like Linden or Ortmeier,
deal them for something useful, then stumble into the playoffs, I say great.  Otherwise, forget it.  I'd rather see our assets used to rebuild the farm and international scouting systems.  The all-free-agent approach is an expensive anachronism.  If this organization wants to compete with the bums and blanks in the coming years, its going to have to start taking player development seriously.
"'alice' was a very importent show to the hip-hop community, that show had mad flo" --pr0FF3ss0r_F4rnsw0rth

by SerpentX on Jul 6, 2006 2:01 PM PDT reply actions  

IF the Giants make it.....
The Giants only have to play 3 games above .500 ball to win the World Series. 3-2, 4-3, 4-3. No prolonged winning streaks involved. The Giants have shown all season that they can't go on major (or even minor) winning streaks, but they don't have too in the playoff's. And mediocrity CAN win the World Series, see '01 Diamondbacks, '02 Angels, '03 Marlins as examples (kinda sad that the Gaints lost to all three.)

If the Giants are to MAKE the playoff's, they need to find another bat, somewhere; be it 1st, 2nd, OF, C, anywhere. The also need to have a healthy Bonds/Alou combo. The pitching seems to me to be playoff caliber. It's the offense that concerns me.

Pedro Feliz: The homeless man's Matt Williams.

by danieljgrant on Jul 6, 2006 2:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
I think the worse thing would be to just sit pat at the deadline and not do anything. If we can ship off mediocre outfield prospects like Ortmeier or lower level guys for even a modest option at 1st like Casey we should do it, as it'll give us an infintely better chance of getting to the playoffs instead of the turnstile of crap currently at 1st (and in the number 3 spot in the order).

That, or trade our valuable veteran free agents for major league ready talent to rebuild. I think just sitting on your hands here is the worse option and doesn't give us a very good shot of making it into the playoffs, nor of rebuilding for the future. Sabes needs to pick a direction and go with it, and not do just another meaningless Ricky Ledee deal.

I use my hand, to wipe my tears.

by McPeePee on Jul 6, 2006 2:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Playoffs a Crapshoot?
Yes, Grant, in a sense the playoffs are a crapshoot. Wasn't it in "Moneyball" where somebody said that you construct a team to win during the season, then what happens in the playoffs is a crapshoot? I subscribe to that theory. The problem is in our attempting to shoot craps during the season, and then optimistically considering our possibilities in the post-season.

As many of us have said before, yes, this team could get to the World Series. Many, many, many things would have to break just right for that to happen, including David Wright's left tibula. At this point, just winning our division seems unlikely. We are sorta/kinda reasonably situated to compete for the wild card, but again we have too many competitors to make that likely with the team as presently constituted.

So I think it comes down to this: is this the kind of team that you want to gamble on and go for broke with a big July trade to acquire that player that gets you into the playoffs, or a team that needs to plan for the future? In 2002, Sabean correctly saw that he had a good enough team and gambled on Kenny Lofton. That was a good decision. But senator, I knew the 2002 Giants, and these, sir, aren't the 2002 Giants.

Therefore, I believe we should have "DNR" put on our medical charts, and no heroic measures to revive our season should be taken. If we get in, we get in. Bully for us. But under no circumstances do we trade away our promising youngsters.

I would prefer we trade Jason Schmidt for 2 prospects before the deadline, assuming other teams are interested and have the kinds of players that would be worth the risk. The Yankees are desperate for pitching, as are the Cardinals, but I don't know that they have the prospects needed to make a good trade with us. Maybe the Tigers go for broke and offer Cameron Maybin or Brent Clevlen or Jeff Larish or Jordan Tata. I don't say trade just to be making a trade, but if we can get 2 prospects off of somebody's Top Ten list, go for it. Just losing Schmidt to FA next year would get us one draft pick, but I'd prefer to trade him for 2 prospects.

However, since MerriamWebster has already asked for a Giants team photo to place next to "mediocre" in their next dictionary, I foresee us hanging around .500 for quite some time. And I fear this false hope will cloud Brian Sabean's mind and cause him to not trade Schmidt. I believe that would be another lost opportunity.  

Waiting for Travis, Nate, Marcus, and Nick P.

by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Jul 6, 2006 2:29 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Playoffs a Crapshoot?
Understand that in Moneyball, Michael Lewis was pretty expressly using this as a self-justifying rationale on Beane's part for the A's lack of success in the playoffs.  Just as he sets up a subtext for much of the so-called Moneyball theories in Beane's psychology of being a "can't miss prospect" who missed... and then blamed his failure on the scouts for improperly evaluating him.

by Roger on Jul 6, 2006 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

How about a deal with the Reds?
They need another arm if they're going to make a serious run.  They've got Jay Bruce and Joey Votto, two promising left-handed bats.  And we want Coutlangus back, dammit.
"'alice' was a very importent show to the hip-hop community, that show had mad flo" --pr0FF3ss0r_F4rnsw0rth

by SerpentX on Jul 6, 2006 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
I inspired a new thread. Awesome.

I'd love to see a power hitting 1b/Bonds/Alou combo tear it up in the playoffs. Or see Schmidt/Morris/Lowry shutting down the opposition in a short series. But I don't see it happening. We all envision it. Want it. I know I do, but you have to get there first. I'd rather not stumble into the postseason having relied on a crap division. I know must of us will take what we can get at this point, but this a total set up for failure I'm sure we'd all like to avoid.

If there was a way to get John Smoltz (I know, the farm sucks, but he's one of my favorite pitchers ever) or a power bat at 1st, I'd be right there with you guys. But even THAT is a longshot. When you can't even get the pieces you need to contend, it doesn't bode well for any plans of a division title.

Is it too late to become a Yankee fan?

by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 6, 2006 2:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
>Is it too late to become a Yankee fan?

I hear the Taliban are coming back strong. Maybe you should root for them, too.

Me gustan tomar mis copas / Aguardiente es lo mejor / También la tequila blanca / Con su sal le da sabor

by leftymalo on Jul 6, 2006 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Not like I'm going to start wearing Dodger blue or anything. I'm not that evil.

P.S. Jeter's clutch. Arod sucks. Mooooooooose! Ber-nie-Will-iams-clap-clap-clapclapclap.

Is it too late to become a Yankee fan?

by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 6, 2006 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good start, but you need to swear a lot more
"'alice' was a very importent show to the hip-hop community, that show had mad flo" --pr0FF3ss0r_F4rnsw0rth

by SerpentX on Jul 6, 2006 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Good start, but you need to swear a lot more
I do in real life. I'm just holding back for you pussy NorCal libs out there. Fuggedaboudit.
Is it too late to become a Yankee fan?

by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 6, 2006 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Smoltz for closer.
FIRE FLIPPY NOW!

by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2006 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
I'd much rather have him starting. Imagine a starting 4 of Schmidt/Smoltz/Morris/Lowry going into the playoffs. Let Benitez or Accardo or a trade close out games. I know they aren't lights out, but the Marlins won in '03 with Braden Looper and Uggy Urbina closing out thier games. And since it's short series baseball, you can get Smoltz to close out games on a few days rest.

What am I thinking? We'll never get him. Especially with Atlanta "contending" now. sigh

Is it too late to become a Yankee fan?

by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 6, 2006 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
I was thinking to myself earlier that the combination of Schmidt, Cain and Morris could be pretty darned formidable in the playoffs.  Add Smoltz, and I'm officially drooling.

by Skaldheim on Jul 6, 2006 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
According to BP, Giants have a 30% chance of making the playoffs.  Better than all but 3 non-NL West teams.

by zenbitz on Jul 6, 2006 4:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
First, I didn't read all the comments so sorry if someone else said what I'm gonna say.

I don't think a mediocre team can win in the playoffs.  The padres last year were a mediocre team (and if I remember correctly, were hot going in) and got demolished by the cards.  I can see a mediocre team stealing a short series from someone, but not making or coming close to winning the world series.  The fact of the matter is the AL is far superior right now, with the best NL team (Mets) being only maybe the 4th or 5th best team in MLB (behind the Tigers, both Sox' and maybe even the Yankees).  No the Yankees suck, I take that back.  

The point is, even if we swindle our way into the playoffs, I expect the result to be a lot more 2003 than 2002.  Of course 2002 never happened - so let's make that: a lot more 1997 than 1989.  

2002? I'm over it.

by wjackalope on Jul 6, 2006 4:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
"First, I didn't read all the comments so sorry if someone else said what I'm gonna say."

As a good rule of thumb, reading just my posts will give you an inordinate amount of brilliant insight and save gobs of time when you're in a hurry.

Today's Spanish lesson: Como se dice "Blown save?" "Armando Benitez?" "Correctamundo!"

by Goofus on Jul 6, 2006 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Being torn between the present and the future, I'm still in the "stand pat" camp.  I still think getting Alou back and keeping him healthy is better than nay move the team could make without gutting the farm system.

Omar/Winn/Durham/Bonds/Alou/Feliz has enough punch if (big if) they all stay in the lineup, I'd be ok with the Swiekro platoon at 1st and let's see what happens.

I don't want to give up guys like Sanchez, Hennessey, Wilson and Accardo for a guy like Casey.

I'm guessing that Sabean will be watching Alou and Durham closely the next couple of weeks to try to determine what he's going to get out of them for the rest of the season.  

Today's Spanish lesson: Como se dice "Blown save?" "Armando Benitez?" "Correctamundo!"

by Goofus on Jul 6, 2006 4:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
"Omar/Winn/Durham/Bonds/Alou/Feliz has enough punch if (big if) they all stay in the lineup, I'd be ok with the Swiekro platoon at 1st and let's see what happens."

Er... I very much disagree. I like Winn, but he is a sub .500 slugging player, as is Durham. Omar can get on base, but has no punch. Sweeney is, well, not all that good. Niekro is garbage.

Think about how much better this lineup would be:

  1. omar
  2. winn
  3. 1b who with +.345 obp and + .525 slug
  4. Bonds
  5. Alou
  6. Feliz
  7. Alfonzo
  8. Durham
Yes, Durham should bat eigth, I have that little faith in him anymore. And although I don't wish him to have headaches for the rest of his life, I hope Matheny doesn't come back and we play Alfonzo for the rest of the year, he's a much, much better hitter.

One thing we are forgetting in this thread is that the Giants starting pitching is pretty damn good (not great, but good) and the bullpen will improve. Let's hope Worrell doesn't come back either. If we can consistently score a few more runs we could win the division and have a chance in the playoff crapshoot. Not a good chance, but as much as the '01 d-backs or '03 marlins.

My VORP is higher than your VORP.

by Poe on Jul 6, 2006 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
D'backs did have arguable one of the 3 greatest LH pitchers in history and a fringe HOFer who's proven to be a great post-season pitcher as there 1-2 starters. That helps. (Incidentally, they also outscored the Yankees by like 200 runs, decimated them in virtually every known statistic baseball keeps, and still came within one errant throw of losing the thing).

by Roger on Jul 6, 2006 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
Alfonzo is going to have to hit this well for a LONG time to make me stop wishing we had somebody else back there.

His defense is so lazy I'm pretty sure it comes with a bowl of beer nuts on its chest, a remote control just out of arms reach, and a TV playing some crap that's driving it crazy, but it's watching because sho ain't getting up to grab the remote.

Anyway, I'm a firm believer that the catcher is the one position player on the team whose defense should not be excused by his offense (yeah, a bit of a Piazza complex here, but also I just don't like passed balls and guys who get to third on pickoffs to center field when a National League team should always be capable of winning with 7 good hitters out of 8 positions).

Unfortunately with this team we don't have 7 good hitters out of 8 positions, so his decent hitting has quieted me some despite the fact that everything he does behind the plate makes me scream. But like I said, he'll have to hit this well for a LONG time to make me stop wishing we had somebody else back there.

Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jul 6, 2006 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
By "punch", I met ability to produce runs, not power.  If I had meant power, I would have said "pop".  Isn't that obvious?  :-)

If your first six guys can show the ability to either get on base and/or drive in runs, I'd say your offense has some punch.  As I said before, I think this is a totally different offense with Alou in the mix.

Sure, I'd like to have that 1B hitting 3rd, but not at the expense of the future.

Today's Spanish lesson: Como se dice "Blown save?" "Armando Benitez?" "Correctamundo!"

by Goofus on Jul 7, 2006 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
As a fellow denizen I am sick and tired of a mediocre team.  Just because the Giants in the past have played better in the second half {is this just supposition or are their facts to back this assertion?}, does not mean they will do so this year.  It seems the health of our players will be somewhat determinative, and there is no guarantee on that front.  As with most of my fellow denizens, I do not want to see young prospects disappear, for fear of another Liriano leaving the system.  However, I doubt that any other team will want to take Linden or Ortmeier or any of the other lower level prospects - {they can read DrB's list of prospects just as well as you and I}.  So, what are we left with?  The NL West will have to get better and with the young players on the Dodgers, Diamondbacks and Rockies getting big league experience - it may happen as early as next year.  Perhaps it would be prudent to attempt to steal the division this year, even if it means a trade for a Casey or a Craig Wilson.

by APGiantsFan on Jul 6, 2006 5:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
What about the effects of "no greenies" and stricter testing for dope?  Who knows what magic is in the clubhouse? Old age combined with increased recovery time and nagging injuries?  

Other than Winn at leadoff, and Vizquel batting behind him, and the pitchers spot in the nine hole, the lineup is a toss-up every single game.  There is little rhythm and very few patterns other than one step forward, one step back, no sense of direction from game to game.  The only sure thing is the starting rotation.  Nobody in the bullpen has a set role--still experimenting with this and that--Mando healthy?  Who knows?  Who's the set up? Who's the closer? Who is situational?  It changes every game.

The Giants are playing like a very tired team right now. At least thats what I've seen the last couple of weeks.  And with Felipe, don't look for any type of let-up. He just grinds and grinds and grinds, either like every single inning of every single game is game 7 or conversley, he waits until 9 guys come to the plate before he decides the pitcher is in trouble.  Like I said, there is no rhythm or pattern here.  There hasn't been for years now.

What is this team going to look like once August hits?  I am not overly optimistic.  Unless, like cited above, Bonds and Alou get healthy, stay healthy and produce and clutch-up over a long series of games.  

I am hopin for the lightning in the bottle, but I wouldn't bet much money on it.

He blames Tomko and I blame Magowan, Alou, Morris, Benitez, El Dopo and a player to be named sooner rather than later--Lance Tool Niekro

by E Ticket on Jul 6, 2006 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
I agree with wjackalope (although out of principle I didn't actually read his comment - hey, if he's not gonna read everyone else's, why should I read his?).

I think a good team can turn great for a few weeks. Or, a good team can turn awful for a few weeks, letting mediocre teams beat them. But for this Giants team, as currently constituted, to win the Serious would require spectacular collapses from three consecutive teams. True mediocrity will out.

"It's not an offensive move, but it might be." - Felipe Alou

by EliminateMe on Jul 6, 2006 6:17 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
I've forgotten the exact question but this team is unlikely to be the answer. Being middle-aged, I have a lot of sympathy for it -- it's almost like my generation is out there on the field -- but it's hard to love. I'd be happy but embarrassed for baseball if by some fluke we managed to win it all.  
For some strange reason, I can't shake the idea that we need the Mayor in the lineup, if only for a day. A big game from him so he gets another start and then enjoys the two-week run of a lifetime....We need some moments of magic to warm our hearts if not save the season.  

by NearestNorwich on Jul 6, 2006 7:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
 The absolute worst thing would be to trade any young players--and I mean any-- for somebody like Casey. Nice guy, but we'd be better off standing pat with Ishikawa, who's a similar player now, but will have more power than Casey in a couple of years.
  That said, I agree with Grant. The Giants' starting pitching could carry them into the World Series if they can win the West-- which sure seems doable.
 

by tito on Jul 6, 2006 7:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
Reasons not to go "Marlins" on the league:

1). Do you really think Sabean is going to get good prospects for veterans?

2)...

3) Profit.

by zenbitz on Jul 7, 2006 9:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Title
Was number 2 dictated by a sleeping Felipe, or for once is the most reasonable explanation not the correct one?
Coming to you by proxy

by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2006 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Title
I'll bet Benitez steals underpants.

by groug on Jul 7, 2006 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Yahoo_full_count

Manager

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant Brisbee

Moderators

Sbzito_small Natto

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Goofus_small Goofus

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Det_7193_small jponry

Authors

09_small JT Jordan

Small steve S

E6dmccicon_small Every6thDay