Giants win, out-Coors the Rockies

Thearon W. Henderson

We've seen that game before. That exact game, played out in full several times. Home team falls behind. Home team gets a three-run homer, and then every hit falls in after that. No matter who comes in from the bullpen, the odds are great that he'll be shaky. Nothing works for the visiting team after they jump out to the big lead. Everything comes up Milhouse for the home team after they catch up.

Usually, though, those games are played in Denver, and the home team is annoying. This was a classic Coors Field win for the Giants. Even though an opposite-field homer at AT&T Park should count for twice as many runs as one in Coors, Brandon Crawford's ball had that same that-isn't-really-going-out-is-it? quality that the worst Coors comebacks have. The Giants outdehumidored the Rockies.

If there were any justice in the world, this would mean that the Rockies would get a grinder of a 2-1 win in Coors later this year. But if there were any justice in the world, a foul pole would have fallen on Shane Victorino by now. So let's not be overly concerned about justice and baseball.

If Giants fans have trouble seeing the little picture, it's obvious why. Parades are fun. Ballpark giveaways with championship logos are fun. Once you get indoor plumbing, you don't care so much about the Field & Streams in the outhouse, right? But every season isn't going to end like that. A majority of the seasons won't end like that. A vast majority of the seasons won't end like that. So what will keep you coming back to baseball?

Games like this in the regular season, when you slump in your chair after three innings and ask yourself over and over and over why you're still watching. There are better things to do. Change it. Change the channel. There might be one of those shows where people look for houses on HGTV, and you never know when it'll be on again. Change it.

Yet from the Troy Tulowitzki homer on, the Giants looked like the best team in baseball. It was a slow con, and we all fell for it. But it turns out that was a perfectly enjoyable baseball game. Of course, these kinds of wins are rare. An example of just how rare:


Source: FanGraphs

After Brandon Belt grounded out to end the fifth, the Giants had about a six-percent chance of winning the game. That's a six-percent chance for an average team to win in a neutral park against an equal team. The win expectancy doesn't take the cold, oppressive air into account. It doesn't care about 420 feet to Triples Alley. It doesn't factor in the chills a player gets when he locks eyes with a seagull that hasn't eaten in a month. So it's even more impressive that the Giants came back.

They'll do it a couple times out of every 100 chances, they will. So appreciate it when it happens.

If you're wondering if the Giants scored nine runs or more in a game at AT&T Park last year, they did it six times. Half of those games were against the Rockies. So maybe this isn't as anomalous as you might have thought. But to do it after falling behind at home ... that wasn't something that happened a lot last year.

Star-divide

Wait, say, that was a Tim Lincecum start, wasn't it? Suppose we should talk about that. He allowed four hits in six innings! Good for him, good for him.

I find it impossible to believe Lincecum could have won two Cy Youngs without ever knowing where the ball was going. That's a working theory, you know -- the difference between then and now is that his stuff used to be much better, which made up for a complete inability to pitch to the catcher's mitt. And I can't buy that. Which means that at some point, Lincecum changed from a guy with good command to one who ate Jonathan Sanchez-dusted mushrooms. How or why? No idea. But Lincecum doesn't walk Juan Nicasio to load the bases in 2009. This year's model can't help it.

In 2009, Lincecum throw at least 60 percent of his pitches in the strike zone in six different outings. He's been over 50 percent three times since the start of the 2011 season, never coming close to 60 percent again. He has no idea where the ball is going. That isn't arm trouble. That's mechanical malfeasance, and he's probably screwing himself more into the ground with every outing.

And for all the discussion about Hector Sanchez, I felt really bad for him. You know he's aware of the grousing -- even if he's not on Baseball Prospectus every morning, people who work for the Giants are. So he spends all night thinking about framing pitches thinking about framing pitches thinking about framing pitches thinking about framing pitches, only to have Lincecum miss his target by a foot over and over again. That's no way to practice the delicate art of framing.

Says here that his release point is off so far:

Chart__1__medium

You know I have no idea what that means. But if you're looking for a sign that something's screwy, that will do. His release point is a lot slingier than it used to be. Oh, another sign that something's screwy: the piles and piles of earned runs.

Welp. Next time, Timmy. Still believe the mechanics are going to set like a broken bone one of these games, even if that's pretty foolish by now.

Star-divide

Hector Sanchez walked twice. Feels like we should send him a case of Zagnut bars or something as reinforcement. As a reminder, he was a noticeable prospect in the low minors because of his high OBPs.

Year Age Lg Lev PA BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS
2007 17 DOSL FRk 146 19 15 .286 .401 .471 .872
2008 18 DOSL FRk 254 36 29 .348 .458 .502 .961
2009 19 ARIZ Rk 139 16 21 .299 .403 .410 .813

Then the pod people came. But nights like tonight make you think a bit. He doesn't have to be Eddie Joost up there, but if he could be an impatient hitter instead of a dreadfully impatient hitter, he could be a offensive-minded catcher after all.

Same thing goes for Brandon Crawford; if he could work in walks and/or more of these home runs, he'd start to be a pretty exciting player.

Hey, the bar is low for catchers and shortstops. The bar is looooow. They both looked excellent enough tonight to make you daydream just a bit.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker