Salvador Perez and the Giants

The odds are decent that you don't know who Salvador Perez is.

2007 17 Rk 99 0 5 10 .244 .320 .279 .599
2008 18 Rk 95 1 7 10 .361 .409 .482 .891
2009 19 Rk,A 396 2 25 40 .267 .313 .356 .669
2010 20 A+ 396 7 18 38 .290 .322 .411 .732
2011 21 AA,AAA 358 10 16 36 .290 .331 .437 .769
2011 21 AL 158 3 7 20 .331 .361 .473 .834
Provided by View Original Table Generated 2/29/2012.

He's a catcher for the Royals. Is he really a .331-hitting catcher? Nope. How good is he? No idea. He's just a puppy. If I wanted to put him into perspective in your Giants-centric universe, I could point out that he's pretty similar to Hector Sanchez.

2007 17 FRk 119 4 19 15 .286 .401 .471 .872
2008 18 FRk 207 4 36 29 .348 .458 .502 .961
2009 19 Rk 117 1 16 21 .299 .403 .410 .813
2010 20 A 310 5 28 50 .274 .336 .394 .730
2011 21 A+ 212 11 11 49 .302 .338 .533 .871
2011 21 AAA 153 1 13 22 .261 .315 .340 .655
Provided by View Original Table Generated 2/29/2012.

But that's not the point. Not quite. Salvador Perez comes up here because I'm absolutely fascinated with the contract he just received. The Royals just guaranteed his contract for five years, eliminating the typical minimum-plus contract for the first three years and buying out at least two of his arbitration years. Total cost for those five years: $7 million. After that, there are three team options for years six through eight: the first is $3.75 million, the second is $5 million, and the last is $6 million.

I've never been this fascinated with a contract before. It's as if Perez is going to walk into the front office tomorrow and declare that he has leprosy. Thanks for all the guaranteed money, suckers. If that happens, though, the downside is that the Royals would be out $7 million. The upside is that they could save scores of millions over the eight years if Perez is something of a star.

What interests me the most, though, is that Perez isn't supposed to be a star. He's highly thought of, but he was never a top-100 prospect. This isn't like an Evan Longoria or Matt Moore deal. This is, again, like the Giants signing Hector Sanchez to a similar deal. The Giants had to pay a decent-to-good player like Cody Ross $6.3 million in his final year of arbitration just for being decent-to-good. They're doing the same with Melky Cabrera.

What the Royals did is hedge their bets that Perez was going to be decent-to-good. If he's decent, the Royals will probably save a little money.

I have no idea if this is a good idea. Seems like it. But it's probably a little above my head, all this contract talk. It still fascinates me. And I wonder if it's going to kick off a trend, or if we're going to realize quickly that one side really hosed the other, and that will be the end of that little fad.

Would you guarantee Hector Sanchez $6 million or $7 million with a bunch of team options after the first five years? I think I would. I have no idea if Sanchez will ever be a major-league starter (and the Giants sort of have a catcher already) ... but I'm a sucker for speculative investments. Explains all the HotBot stock I'm sitting on until the market turns around.

Thank you for indulging my whimsy. You may now return to not thinking about Salvador Perez.

In This Article

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.