FanPost

Five reasons Brandon Crawford may actually be this good

Good field, no hit.  That's the conventional wisdom on Brandon Crawford.  And now he's up, and playing great, and what do we hear?  Small sample size fluke.  BABIP lucky, unsustainable.  A Bablip, if you will.

I beg to differ.

1) In 2007, after a sophomore season at UCLA where he put up a .335/.405/.504 line, he was regarded as one of the top prospects in baseball, quite possibly a first round pick.  He then went to the Cape Cod league, and stopped hitting, possibly because of the sometimes difficult adjustment guys have to make to wooden bats.  His slump carried over to his junior season, and he began falling in pre-draft prospect lists. This is a good thing--it meant we could use our first pick that year on Buster, and still get Crawford in the fourth round.  Point is: he was seen as a potential star after his sophomore year of college, and fell to the fourth round because he needed to make some swing adjustments.

2) Which he made.  2009, he wore out California League pitching to the tune of .371/.445/.600.  That earned him a promotion to AA, where he struggled, and where the 'good field no hit' trope began.  .256.294/.365.  2010, his struggles continued: .241/.337/.357. Cold as a state trooper's grin.   He has never played at the AAA level.  He hasn't hit well in Richmond.  But . . .

3) Nobody hits in Richmond.  Of course, it may simply be the indignity of being a Flying Squirrel, but nobody (except Brandon Belt) hits there.   I don't know what that ballpark is like, but it must be something else again, with the dimensions of the Astrodome, the foul territory of the Polo Grounds, and the gravitational pull of the planet Jupiter. Check out these numbers: .266/.303/.358.  That's the triple slash batting line of Charlie Culberson, who leads the team this season in OPS.  The whole Eastern League has apparently reverted to the equipment and approach popular in 1908.  So . . .

4) If we regard Crawford's San Jose raking as fluky, caused by a hot streak in a good hitter's environment, what are we to make of his struggles in a very tough hitter's environment?  Isn't it likely that his ability lies somewhere between those two extremes?  (Of course, we need to similarly take Eric Surkamp's numbers with a grain of salt.) I'd prefer to . . .

5) Look at the player I'm seeing right now, and I see a patient hitter with a quick, short swing.  If anything, he's been unlucky so far, some scorched line drives right at people.  Of course, major league pitchers will adjust to him, and he'll have to adjust to their adjustments.  But I see no reason not to think we've found our shortstop of the future.  For now, I'll err on the side of optimism.

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker