OT: Fanpost etiquette
I posted my Sanchez rant right after the loss. Didn't have the patience to wait for Grant. And was mightily pissed. Plus, the 1500 comment threads get a little tedious at times. Especially because they morph into discussions on all sorts of topics.
I got blasted some for my "inappropriate" fan post - the argument being I should have just posted a comment. I'm not complaining, I'm just stating a fact.
I enjoy this site. I particularly enjoy Grant's writing . He in informative and entertaining. I love the Minor Lines as it gives me a little glimpse into the future.
I've learned something about Sabermetrics.
But I admit - I don't understand how this board "works". Are there generally accepted ground rules for a "fan post" versus a simple comment. If so, what are they.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
75 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The idea is that if your FanPost is essentially part of another discussion that is already going on elsewhere on the site, the way that comments about Sanchez’s performance could have easily been part of the postgame thread, then you should put them there and not start a new discussion.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
"You all are just blinded to reality by your hatred of Armando just as the Bonds haters are." -grm
A fanpost should bring something new to the table. If it’s already been discussed in a GDT or PGT it really shouldn’t be in a fanpost.
To be quite honest over the past few months I don’t read very many fanposts: there are too many of them, most of them rehash old ground, and some (judging from the subject line) don’t appear to be very well thought out. Who has the time?
A couple of years ago a lot of the tedious fanposts would be taken on an off topic roller coaster ride. That doesn’t happen much anymore, the hijacking did get out of hand at times, but I think it also cut down on the redundant postings… jcb9 we miss you!
Too many of the "hey look at what I figured out bet none of you thought of this!" variety
Obviously any links in the above post are probably NSFW
The baseball gods do not always punish the wicked but they will not just allow people to spit in their faces -- Joe Posnanski
I wish I would stop cheating. fuck. this is jctgamer's fault -- jponry
But something is wrong with Timmy!
Back on the market.
by positiveuphemism on Aug 14, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions
We should totally trade Cain for Fielder. I can’t believe no one but me has thought of this.
Juan "Doesn't Cheat The Game" Perez, please keep hitting.
I thought of it 109 times
For the thirteen time in 3 or one evers, I found myself toothlessly thinking about Manny Ramirez.
Eric Byrnes is a FA
Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster
Who has the time?
I say the same about 1500+ comment threads…..
by Missing Barry on Aug 15, 2010 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions
If you just want a discussion on a single thought that isn’t already being discussed elsewhere, make a fan shot. If you actually want to write your own post about a more broad subject, make a fan post.
Things not to write about:
1 – a game. Why? Because every game has a pre and a post game thread. This also includes a certain performance for said game.
2 – roster moves. Why? Because it is overdone and gets discussed all over, anyway. Mind you, this is in season.
3 – fantasy baseball. Why? Because no one cares about your fantasy baseball team. Write about your real life dreams and fantasies and you will get much better results.
And to reiterate: if you just want to have a small little side thread about a random subject, make a fan shot.
Back on the market.
by positiveuphemism on Aug 14, 2010 11:50 AM PDT reply actions
lexluth7, you feel hurt and some what bullied because certain people on here don’t like dissenting and critical views of the Giants. Some people just can’t handle the truth.
by fabiani1233 on Aug 14, 2010 12:37 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I can only handle groupthink.
Dissenting views frighten me
For the thirteen time in 3 or one evers, I found myself toothlessly thinking about Manny Ramirez.
you mean grougthink
"he walked 18; new league record! Struck out 18, another new league record! He also hit the sportswriter, the PA announcer, the bull mascot twice..."
by i did my job on Aug 14, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions
You must be new
Giant Dirtbags: John Bowker, Steve Hammond, Brian Anderson.
Jeremy Affeldt induces strained obliques
by Giant among Angels on Aug 14, 2010 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, you are the keymaster.
Utter frustration and futility.
Adopted 'nephew' to the ever avuncular and always awesome Jon Miller
by Johnny Disaster on Aug 15, 2010 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions
You should create a fanshot about groupthink
Juan "Doesn't Cheat The Game" Perez, please keep hitting.
I do think an attempt should be made to contribute to existing discussion without creating a separate fanpost/shot that is basically what everyone else is saying. That’s just being neighborly.
On the other hand, I sympathize with lex’s point about 1500-comment threads. I find those extremely daunting to read, let alone participate in. You can reply directly to a comment and because there’s so much volume, your reply shows up 10 screens away. If you have a variation on a point or want to pick up something that’s been left off, I don’t see why a separate fanpost/shot is so bad. So long as people exercise a little discretion.
Nothing wrong with the fanshots. The prob is all the redundant and/or pointless fanposts. OF course it will get to a point where there are too many fanshots, too. But at least there is an attempt at differentiating between one and the other.
An easy way to look at it, fanposts are where you pretend you are a columnist. Fanshots are where you talk about single line/picture/link items.
Back on the market.
by positiveuphemism on Aug 14, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Good point, pe.
I drop in on fanposts only occasionally, and I’ve only started on this season, but you’ve stated pretty well the distinction that’s intended.
I don’t think there’s much to be done about the lengthy threads. They are the nature of this beast. If the Giants get into September at (or near) the top, this will become worse, and many newbies without a clue regarding etiquette will emerge.
Gallo will try to be gracious to all, but sometimes he will fail.
He is the World's Most Annoying Rooster.
by gallo del cielo on Aug 14, 2010 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't really get it either
and I’m glad you asked. Is there some kind of quota for fanposts or is it that we don’t want the good ones to slide off the bottom of the sidebar? If that’s the case they ought to have been recommended so they’d be up there at the very tippy top. It’s one thing if the fanpost is offensive or spammy (Read my blog!) or just inarticulate/illiterate/you can tell the person is a mouthbreathing idiot. But this one was just … a diary type entry. I didn’t know why there was so much pushback.
Still backing Notgardo, wheresoever he may wander. (Don't forget to wriiiite!)
Post what you want to post. Board regulars — and this goes for most internet message boards — have a core of people who have a comprehensive knowledge of everything going on the board. When people make casual contributions, regulars tend to get bent out of shape. My take on this decorum is … whatever. I’m not trying to bag on the McCoven in-crowd. This is the way most message boards roll. My advice is know what you want to say, say it, and choose your battles.
This is true..but doesn’t take into account when people don’t actually check to see if the same thing, or something similar, has already been posted and is just a couple inches away on their screen.
Back on the market.
by positiveuphemism on Aug 14, 2010 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Whatever. If he didn’t see it, he didn’t see it. Casual fans are entitled to come by to ask for opinions on a quick topic. It’s a message board. Not a court of law. Fans shouldn’t be made to feel unwelcome because they don’t know the ins-and-outs of the unwritten board code of conduct.
STAY OFF MY MOUND!!
"You can always recover from the player you didn't sign. You may never recover from the player you signed at the wrong price." --Billy Beane
"I am not an idiot."--Brian Sabean
by Sabean's_Folly on Aug 14, 2010 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions
The link being a couple inches away is irrelevant if it’s buried in a 1000+ post thread, particularly if it’s the first or second incarnation of the gameday thread which is essentially a chat with little staying power past the final pitch.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
When I go to make a fanshot I always check to see if the subject’s been covered. When it’s something that I’m pretty sure HAD to have been covered, and I don’t see it, I use the SBN search function to make sure it’s not buried somewhere.
To me it’s just common courtesy to other readers to try and keep everything all in one place.
I also don’t feel like: I’M THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSON IN THE WORLD, NOBODY ELSE COULD HAVE POSSIBLY THOUGHT OF WHAT I THOUGHT OF!!!! EVERYBODY LOOK AT ME!!!!!
Even if the topic has come up, that doesn’t mean it’s been covered. Like I said in the other original post, there’s a sizable number of regulars here who purposely avoid the gameday threads because they’re ridiculously busy, moving past interesting topics before they get going and precluding thoughtful, long-form posts. If you want to discuss something that’s only been dealt with superficially in a dead thread, then starting a new one is completely appropriate.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
there’s a sizable number of regulars here who purposely avoid the gameday threads because they’re ridiculously busy, moving past interesting topics before they get going and precluding thoughtful, long-form posts
/raises his hand
by Missing Barry on Aug 15, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
also raises hand
I haven’t been able to open one of the game day threads or post game threads in a long time. They are just too damn big.
My work computer has a very, very difficult time with anything over 600 or so comments. Not that I ever log on from work or anything…. ;)
by Missing Barry on Aug 15, 2010 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Log on from work? Preposterous!
I can’t handle gameday threads at work, and I can barely handle them at home. All the gifs kill my computer.
I feel prickishly demanding!
I couldn't be prouder of my recent adoptee - Tim Lincecum's dealer. He provides the secret fuel behind both Cy Youngs. Also, he taught Timmy the change-up.
by giantsfansince1981 on Aug 16, 2010 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Actually most message boards I've seen don't work like "Fan Posts"
The message boards I’ve seen have a system where a recent comment pushes it to the top, so “hot topics” are near the top and others fall to the bottom.
In my opinion, there are two reasons people want a little bit of quality content in Fan Posts:
1. I think most people would agree that fewer posts with higher quality leads to better discussion. This is the reason we delete repetitive Posts.
2. Every new fan Post pushes another one off the main page. If people posted Fan Posts every time they had a thought, all Fan Posts would get pushed off the page before anyone could read them.
Proudly adopted Aubrey Huff. You can't beat that!
I’d like to see the most active fanposts stay at the top of the list. I suppose that this site doesn’t accommodate that style? I don’t think rec’s are the answer, since rec’ed but inactive posts will stay up for a while.
I DON'T BELIEVE YOU
I tweet (more often than I blarg).
I don’t really get bent out of shape about fanposts anymore, especially now that there’s the “recommended” section at the top. Or maybe the mods are deleting repetitive ones without my noticing.
It’s a little bit of both. For example, fabiani123 was making posts for every Dunn mis-step a couple weeks ago. I’m pretty sure the mods came through and got rid of them cause they were gone real quick.
"Buster's basically a 21-year-old hot-chick that's an old soul" - Barry Zito
Welcome to McCovey Chronicles: Calm down
by Prussian Creole on Aug 14, 2010 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions
my 2 cents
After a horrid loss or a big win, we all want to let off a little steam. That’s totally what pre/post game threads are there for. Your mini-rant would have fit in perfectly there… so why wasn’t it there? I think it is as simple as that. You don’t need to take the etiquette police so seriously in this case. It’s just a matter of organization and sorting.
The “I get lost in 1000 comments” comment, is certainly a true feeling, and I have definitely been there. But saying “Your 1000 posts are tedious, I don’t have the time or inclination to read them, but my single idea is important so here it is.” can come off kind of arrogant and self-centered. I know that it is more that you want to to talk about a single thing and those big thread talk a lot about of things (and a lot of nothing). But a interesting comment, point of view, or questions won’t totally be ignored. Just Shift-A to clear the unread comments then Cntrl-F to search for the topic you want to address. Then reply or comment away as appropriate. Computers will do the Boolean searching for you and you can follow by clicking your log-in name in the top left hand corner.
I see fanposts and fanshots as a spot to share some new idea or shepherd in some alternative topic. Less for rants more for discussion. There really isn’t a comeback to a good rant, just “You’re right.” or “You’re crazy”. Or “this doesn’t belong here, we are ranting over n this corner”.
Some of the negative reaction may have also come from your rants content. Sanchez didn’t have a great start last night, but IMO he didn’t cost the Giants any more than the impotent offense. If he had imploded and allowed 10 runs, sure I could blame him. 2-3 or even 5 ER and to me its not (just) the pitchers fault – its a team game. That probably comes from watching all those great offense teams from around 1998-2004, that could get Woody 14 wins.
co-dad w/AfDC of
Ishikawa, the Topps Rookie All Star Team's First baseman. Does he get a chance in 2010?
"Because I don’t know what it means anymore, in the PCL. It’s almost like years ago."
"That’s not to say Buster isn’t fully committed or all-in. He is. He’s smart and he’s got the advance reports. Anybody who said he’s not ready to catch in the big leagues is crazy because he’s a pretty good catcher, especially throwing." - Sabean 7/11/10
by kennv on Aug 14, 2010 11:01 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
This was very well said
I’d also add that after a loss, there’s probably 1,000 people who are pissed about something in the game. If everyone of them said, “I’m pissed about something in the game. I better make a Fan Post!”, things would get out of control in a hurry.
Proudly adopted Aubrey Huff. You can't beat that!
I don't get the "this is being discussed somewhere else"
Especially if it’s being discussed somewhere in a 1000 comment thread. Some people never comment in those threads at all, so if someone wants to discuss something that’s buried in a huge thread like that one that probably covers 100 different topics I don’t see the issue. Also, if it’s something that is not specifically the point of another fanpost than why not devote a fanpost to a particular discussion? Especially given that some fanposts are nothing more than a montage someone came up with.
I’m not saying that people should post fanpost about the same topic again and again, but if someone put up a fanpost that was cut and pasted from their crappy blog, or if the topic was being discussed in some thousand comment thread on the main page. I don’t get what the big deal is.
So optimistic I fart sunshine and rainbows.
Giants Front Office....Torture!
Especially if it’s being discussed somewhere in a 1000 comment thread.
Personally speaking, if I arrive at the party 1000 comments too late, I’m not going in. Not unless there’s free booze and I can get liquored up.
My only advice, lex, is look to see if the topic you want to post about is already being discussed in another fanpost. The gameday threads and post game threads are too crazy to be concerned about, but make sure your topic isn’t already being addressed in the fanposts.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
Also
If you are being critical of someone for breaking the unwritten MCC rules, have some tact. Don’t lose your internet temper and flame someone who isn’t treating anyone with disrespect. Lexluth7 didn’t write anything in his fanpost to deserve being berated by Goofus. Treat other people with the same common decency you would expect to be treated on or off the interwebs.
No one here gets out alive.
Goofus is a mod.
He was doing his job.
Adopted Giant: Ryan Rohlinger (on loan from Shanghaijim).
Buster Posey: He knows the rules!
♥BARRY ZITO♥
A mod’s job is to berate people? It all makes perfect sense now.
So optimistic I fart sunshine and rainbows.
Giants Front Office....Torture!
by Giant Torture on Aug 15, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions
I don’t think that’s what kdl is inferring. I went back to that fanpost just to see, I wouldn’t consider what Goofus said to be out of line or berating lexluth7.
Obviously any links in the above post are probably NSFW
The baseball gods do not always punish the wicked but they will not just allow people to spit in their faces -- Joe Posnanski
I wish I would stop cheating. fuck. this is jctgamer's fault -- jponry
Ooh, snarky!
Of course, jctGamer is correct that you shouldn’t put words into my mouth, but I guess I need to be extra clear. He was not berating, he was explaining. His job is to regulate the threads and explain to people when they’ve done something they shouldn’t have. That’s what he was doing.
I have said this before, and I’ll say it again: the mods have a tough job, and I’m not going to second guess their judgment. If Grant doesn’t like how they’re doing things, he’ll regulate.
Adopted Giant: Ryan Rohlinger (on loan from Shanghaijim).
Buster Posey: He knows the rules!
♥BARRY ZITO♥
Shit I almost got banned by Goofus once. I deserved it though.
Obviously any links in the above post are probably NSFW
The baseball gods do not always punish the wicked but they will not just allow people to spit in their faces -- Joe Posnanski
I wish I would stop cheating. fuck. this is jctgamer's fault -- jponry
Really? Wow! You must have done something really bad.
Adopted Giant: Ryan Rohlinger (on loan from Shanghaijim).
Buster Posey: He knows the rules!
♥BARRY ZITO♥
I railed on GRM once relentlessly, and crossed the line a little. Even if it was just a step, it still crossed the line. I apologized to him at last year’s meet up.
Obviously any links in the above post are probably NSFW
The baseball gods do not always punish the wicked but they will not just allow people to spit in their faces -- Joe Posnanski
I wish I would stop cheating. fuck. this is jctgamer's fault -- jponry
I always rail on GRM relentlessly….. :(
by Missing Barry on Aug 16, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions
To clarify since my post wasn’t clear : GRM wasn’t at the meetup, I apologized to Goofus. Although I would have apologized to GRM as well if he showed up!
Obviously any links in the above post are probably NSFW
The baseball gods do not always punish the wicked but they will not just allow people to spit in their faces -- Joe Posnanski
I wish I would stop cheating. fuck. this is jctgamer's fault -- jponry
Some people seem to provoke a lot of ire, but none of us are exempt from the rules, I guess!
Adopted Giant: Ryan Rohlinger (on loan from Shanghaijim).
Buster Posey: He knows the rules!
♥BARRY ZITO♥
How dare they not fit in with McC groupthink!
by Missing Barry on Aug 16, 2010 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions
ABUSE OF POWER!!!
POWER TO THE NERBS!
POWER TO THE NERBS!
Starting today, I’m going to raise my right fist in protest each time I hear the National Anthem.
And I’m going to hold my breath until the tyranny here ends. Ok, here I go. Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhh!
Ok, I’m holding my breath.
Still holding it and feeling fine, but this abuse by moderators had better stop RIGHT NOW!
Still waiting…….
Still…………….
Guys?
GUYS?
GAIZ!!?????
Ackkkkkkkkgrrrrrrrrrhhaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
"You can always recover from the player you didn't sign. You may never recover from the player you signed at the wrong price." --Billy Beane
"I am not an idiot."--Brian Sabean
by Sabean's_Folly on Aug 16, 2010 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Did he pass out?
"I just struck out looking three times, but in any other ballpark those would have been home runs." - Aubrey Huff
by howtheyscored on Aug 17, 2010 1:26 AM PDT up reply actions
I didn't mind Goofus comment
and I didn’t know he was a moderator.
Sunday morning curmudgeon view:
Guy writes a poorly thought out, uninformative fanpost with a dickish title. Guy gets called on it. Guy whines in a separate fanpost.
Utter frustration and futility.
Adopted 'nephew' to the ever avuncular and always awesome Jon Miller
by Johnny Disaster on Aug 15, 2010 9:16 AM PDT reply actions
well…lex luther is a dick
Back on the market.
by positiveuphemism on Aug 15, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions
i mean the character
Back on the market.
by positiveuphemism on Aug 15, 2010 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Not at all.
I expected disagreement with the content – that is what makes this all fun – right? i didn’t expect the “this shouldn’t be a fan post” part. And that is why I posted this question.
There are a finite number of Fan Posts available.
SO DON’T WASTE THEM!
Here's to the Dodgers and their bucket of suck.
In the sense that only so many can fit on the page, pointless ones are indeed a waste of space
Proudly adopted Aubrey Huff. You can't beat that!
I prefer discussions on Giants topics that take place in the fanposts, as opposed to the front page stories. For instance, I initially started discussing the Guillen trade on the front page thread, but once it had a few hundred comments, I left and participated in the fanpost conversation about it instead. The discussions are more focused, stay more on topic, and don’t get out of control from the sheer number of comments. I do think it’s easier to have a quality discussion in the fanposts than any front page thread. So I’m all for fanposts, even on topics related to front page stuff. If you’re going to write a fanpost, just make it thoughtful. If your fanpost isn’t well thought out, chances are, the discussion that follows won’t be, either.
I found Mccoven and Fangraphs advanced statistics about 2 months ago, and i fell in love with the info and that other people where this serious about Giants Baseball.
Also this is the first message board i have ever cared about so i didnt know the rules, still dont know them. but a couple times i came out of my shell and posted a comment i had people really pissed off at me cuz i didnt reply right. downright rude id say. I almost wanted to stop reading Mccoven all together, was a little but-hurt, but i decided to not be thin skinned. i dont post often becouse someone usually has commented about what i am thinking. but sometimes i want to include myself.
I see alot of people being rude to the newbies not just me. maybe there should be a thread for the new person kinda like this thread to inform us what is annoying and what is proper when making a fanpost or just replying to any thread. so the IN-Crowd doesnt get all pissy. Maybe its harder for me becouse i have never been on message boards before.
Its not easy being a giants fan

by 


















