minor lines, 7/5/10
Monday highlights from the Giants' farm: Manny Burriss had four hits, Davis Mixon allowed just 1 ER in 7.0 IP, and Tommy Joseph and Ryan Cavan were two of four GreenJackets to homer as part of multi-hit performances. Also notable, Brandon Belt homered and Chris Heston allowed just 2 ER in 7.0 IP.
AAA: Fresno defeated Colorado Springs 8-6(after scoring six runs in the 4th inning)
Fresno: SS Manny Burriss: 4 for 5, SB
Fresno: LF John Bowker: 2 for 2, 2B, 2 BB
Colorado Springs: 3B Omar Quintanilla: 2 for 3, HR, 2 BB
Fresno: SP Daryl Maday: 6.0 IP, 5 H, 5 R, 5 ER, 3 BB, 8 K--2 HR
Burriss had four hits, raising his AVG to .302 through seventeen PCL games. Bowker, who had the Grizzlies' only other multi-hit line, also reached base four times. The Rockies' Quintanilla also reached base four times, including his 1st HR of the year.
Maday, who had a 2.34 ERA in sixteen starts for Richmond, made his PCL debut. He gave up 5 ER but also had 8 K. His K/IP as Flying Squirrel was 0.60.
AA: Richmond defeated Harrisburg 5-1
Richmond: 1B Brandon Belt: 1 for 3, HR, BB, SO
Richmond: 3B Conor Gillaspie: 3 for 3, SH
Richmond: SP David Mixon: 7.0 IP, 6 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 2 BB, 0 K
Harrisburg: SP John Lannan: 7.0 IP, 9 H, 4 R, 4 ER, 1 BB, 4 K--1 HR
Belt and Gillaspie led the Flying Squirrels' offense for the second straight day, with Belt again homering and Gillaspie again having multiple hits. With the three hits, Gillaspie raised his AVG to .264.
Mixon bounced back from his last start (5 ER in 4.1 IP) with his fifth quality start in his last six starts. But with no strikeouts, his K/IP fell below 0.70. Lannan, who began the year in the Nationals' rotation but had a 5.76 ERA over fourteen starts, made his third minor league start.
A+: San Jose lost to Bakersfield 4-3
(after leading 3-1 through six innings)
San Jose: RF Francisco Peguero: 0 for 4, 3 SO
San Jose: LF Wendell Fairley: 2 for 4, 2 2B
San Jose: SP Eric Stolp: 6.1 IP, 6 H, 3 R, 3 ER, 3 BB, 3 K--1 HB
San Jose: RP Edwin Quirarte: 2.0 IP, 5 H, 1 R, 1 Er, 2 BB--1 IBB
With two doubles for the second straight day, Fairley has doubled his season total to 8 doubles. His AVG is now .290. Peguero had the oh-fer with the hat trick, snapping his seven game hitting streak during which he had six multi-hit games. His SO/AB rose just above 20%.
Stolp had a quality start, even with his ground ball tendencies not being as pronounced as usual (8/7 GO/FO line yesterday). Is Quirarte a streaky pitcher? Through his first sixteen apperances, he had allowed just 2 ER. In his last eight appearances, he has allowed 9 ER, taking the loss four times. Yesterday he also allowed both inherited runners to score.
A-: Augusta defeated Lexington 10-2
Augusta: LF Nick Liles: 3 for 5
Augusta: 2B Ryan Cavan: 3 for 5, HR, CS
Augusta: 1B Luke Anders: 2 for 5, HR
Augusta: C Tommy Joseph: 2 for 5, HR, 2B
Augusta: SS Ydwin Villegas: 2 for 5, HR, SO
Augusta: SP Chris Heston: 7.0 IP, 5 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 1 BB, 6 K--1 HB, 1 WP
Augusta: RP Hector Correa: 1.0 IP, 3 K
The GreenJackets went deep four times. Going back-to-back in the 3rd inning, Anders and Joseph had their 10th and 9th HRs. In the 8th inning, Cavan added his 9th HR, and Villegas had his 1st pro HR. Liles added three more hits too, raising his AVG to .322.
Heston had one of his best starts of the year, picking up his first win in nearly two months. He improved his ERA to an even 5.00 through sixteen starts. Correa struck out all three batters he faced. He has a K/IP above 1.25 but also a WHIP above 1.50.
ssA: Salem-Keizer defeated Vancouver 7-4
Salem-Keizer: 2B Julio Izturis: 2 for 4, BB, SO
Salem-Keizer: 3B Kyle Mach: 3 for 4, 3B, 2 E
Salem-Keizer: SP Edwin Escobar: 4.0 IP, 7 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 2 BB, 4 K--3 WP
Izturis and Mach had the Volcanoes' two multi-hit lines, raising their respective AVGs to .340 and .254. Mach also committed his 5th and 6th errors.
Escobar had his second straight start with just 4.0 IP, this time allowing a season-high 7 H after allowing a season-high 5 BB in his previous start. His WHIP is above 1.50.
R: Giants defeated Brewers 7-0
Scottsdale: 2B Carlos Willoughby: 2 for 4, 2 2B, SH, SO
Scottsdale: LF Jose De La Cruz: 2 for 3, 2B, BB
Scottsdale: SP Austin Fleet: 5.0 IP, 3 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 8 K--1 WP
Scottsdale: RP Addison Proszek: 1.0 IP, 3 K
De La Cruz reached base three times in his fifth game in the U.S. Willoughby doubled twice, giving him a 3/14 XBH/H line.
Fleet, the Giants' sixteenth rounder this year, had his second straight start with 0 ER and 8 K in 5.0 IP. Proszek has now struck out five of his six batters.
DSL: Giants lost to Yankees1 8-4
Dominican: DH Luis Vasquez: 3 for 4, 2B
Dominican: RP Luis Utria: 5.1 IP, 6 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 1 BB< 3 K--1 WP
Vasquez (19.3 y.o.) had three of the Gigantes' five hits, raising his AVG to .310. Utria (17.10 y.o.) provided effective long relief. He has gone at least 4.0 IP in all four of his appearances.
125 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hurry up and go see him before he gets promoted to the bigs and turns into Joey Votto!
Jonathan Sanchez: Often maddening to watch, but capable of perfection on a moment's notice---just like his adoptive father.
If only Belt could hit 21 HR before the ASG!
Matt Graham is an anagram for .... why don't you ask the scrabble expert!
by say hey nation on Jul 6, 2010 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Was at the Squirrels' Game Last Night
Belt, looks like the real deal, although he was fooled on a couple of pitches you could see that he was making adjustments. While I’m still not sold on Thomas Neal after seeing him a number of times this year, I really like Belt.
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Crawford shows flashes, but you can see that he needs to make adjustments at the plate. His glove is outstanding though, from what I’ve seen. Maday looked good while he was here, but I only saw him pitch once. Also I think people forget how young Nick Noonan is (just turned 21), it’s apparent up close and it remains to be seen how he’ll develop. Neal looks good at times, but there’s something about him that I can’t put my finger on that says that he isn’t the real deal, maybe it’s because he seems to press with runners in scoring position. Kieschneck (probably misspelled) looks absolutely lost at times and I don’t expect a ton from him. Gillaspie is another guy who is helter skelter, sometimes he looks great other times not so much, but he just seems to carry himself like a snot-nosed punk, not to say that that will deter him, but definitely warps my opinion. Of course these are my observations over the 6 or 7 games I’ve been to this year.
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions
LOL Gillaspie with the ego
Chicks dig the long ball slappy opposite-field single
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 6, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I don’t know he just looks like the type of kid who shows up at your front door to take your daughter out, and without saying a word you close said door and go up to your daughter’s room to search for drugs then start calling all-girls schools to see where she’ll be going.
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Though it’s worth noting that an elevated sense of one’s abilities is a pretty indispensable tool for a professional athlete. Because they’re ego’s gotta stand up to an ungodly bashing on a pretty regular basis.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
True
Which is why I said that it won’t necessarily deter him, but rather any assessment from me will be flawed because I’m hoping he’s TPTBNL in whatever dumbass trade Sabean concocts this year.
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Austin Fleet
With a name like that he really should be a base-stealing, ball-hawking CF.
As a pitcher, he’s too good for the AZL and should be sent up to Salem, while Matt Graham obviously could benefit from being back in Scottsdale and closer to our pitching gurus. It’s good to see that Fleet can succeed as a starting pitcher after only starting in 3 of his 31 appearances for Coastal Carolina this spring.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
LOLBowker
Too bad he can’t hit major league pitching in sporadic starts while playing for a manager who he knows has no confidence in him.
He walks too much to help SF – he’s cheatin’ the game.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Plus he hits for power, and the Giants already have power hitting outfielders like Aaron Rowand.
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions
Plus Scott's a gritty gamer
He always has way more dirt on his uni at the end of a game than Bowker.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
When was the last time Bowker left his face on a chain link fence?
Q: Did you ever make an offer for Vladimir Guerrero?
Sabean: In a word: No. If we had signed Guerrero or [Gary] Sheffield, we would have been without [Long list of replacement level vets]—obviously not being able to field a competitive team, especially from an experience standpoint, given our level of spending.
AAAA Player AT Best, According To M y Eyeres
/grm’d
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
Chuckie Jones
I think that I jinxed him. After posting on Saturday how surprisingly good his early performance in the AZL has been (especially his lack of Ks), Jones has gone 0 for 6 in his last 2 games – with 4 Ks. Ouch!
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I believe in Chuckie
I don’t know why, but I’m irrationally pulling for the guy.
Proud of both my adopted son, Baggs, and my ward, Ryan LOLlis.
What's irrational about that?
I mean you are a Giants fan, right?
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Ryan Cavan
dude seems to be turning it on after a slow start
The Giants don’t fare well against pitchers.
Yeah, but we always knew he could hit. His big problem going forward is going to be his glove. They moved him off SS to 2B in the hopes of alleviating his fielding woes, but he’s already rung up 17 errors in only 80 games there. Right now his possible MLB future looks to be reduced to being a DH/pinch-hitter.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Do we really know he can hit? .283/.351/.449 from a guy who’s at least two years too old for his level isn’t terribly impressive.
I was promised lasagna.
Cookyman’s right, though. Statistically, Cavan’s essentially a less hacky Dominguez. Both are 23 year old IF in Low A ball, with boatloads of errors, and pretty similar slash lines:
Cavan: .283/.349/.443
Dominguez .274/.319/.444
Cavan does have a significant advantage in BB/K rate (31/56 as compared to Dominguez spectacularly awful 17/82), but I don’t know that that difference is enough to outweigh the age relative to league issue.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Leonardo Fuentes
After a great start to the season in the DSL, our young Colombian bonus-baby has hit a real slump lately. He started the first 3 weeks of the season great – getting his average up around the .330 level, but his slash over the last 10 games has been ugly: .121/.275/.273/.548 with 11 Ks in 37 ABs.
Let’s hope it’s a temporary thing.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
at least he’s still posting strong secondary averages. And he’s had a couple OF assists (squinting real hard to see the bright side)!
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
For sure
I’m not down on him at all – he’s young and it’s extremely early and a SSS. I was just providing an update. Steve usually just has enough time and space to tell about the guys going good.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Yup. He’s definitely on my watch list. Gotta like the tools he’s displayed so far. Jose de la Cruz, is another one. I’m real interested in watching his progress.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Yeah, between him, de la Cruz and Chuckie Jones, it appears we should get at least 1 good toolsy OF prospect to SF by 2013.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Well, I’d have to take the con position on that. I’m interested in all three, but I wouldn’t even want to begin discussing their chances of ever being major leaguers, much less within three years. I don’t even begin thinking about whether someone’s likely to be a productive major leaguer before they’ve handled A+ ball pretty well, and it’s not too wise to think about it before AA. On top of which, making it from a complex league to the majors in 3 years (not to mention off-shore summer leagues to the majors) would be an extraordinarily unusual metioric rise. Mike Trout might well accomplish that feat (but not by a lot) but he was a bit unusual in the first place in that 1st round draftees don’t normally stay in the complex leagues for the entire season.
Just by way of comparison, looking back at the 2006 lists of top prospects in the AZL and GCL I see Clayton Kershaw and Neftali Feliz as guys who made the majors in three (or even four) years. While the best remaining prospects on these lists are Hank Conger, Carlos Peguero, Chris Marrero, Adrian Cardenas and Gorkys Hernandez. Not a lot of folks banging on the doors.
And spot checking one more time because I happen to hae the book here, looking at the 2004 lists we’ve got Yovani Gallardo, Jesus Flores, and Carlos Gomez are the three (out of 40) who rocketed to the majors in 3 years, plus that year included Pablo Sandoval (4 years) and Neil Walker (6 years). The tops of the lists that year were Matt Tuiasosopo, hernan Iribarrn, Luis Soto (Red Sox ss) and Gaby Hernandez. In ’06 the top 2 were Conger, Jeremy Jeffress, and Kershaw and Chris Parmalee.
So, not exactly the greatest success rates. But we’ll keep watching and hoping for good development and take it from there.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
That said, we might as well toss Chris Lofton into the OF wish list watch folder, and of course Brown as well.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Where's RafRod?
Thought he would be in Scottsdale.
Q: Did you ever make an offer for Vladimir Guerrero?
Sabean: In a word: No. If we had signed Guerrero or [Gary] Sheffield, we would have been without [Long list of replacement level vets]—obviously not being able to field a competitive team, especially from an experience standpoint, given our level of spending.
Was the starting LF for most of the first 2 weeks of the NWL season for Salem-Keizer, but his pitiful performance with the bat has relegated him to the bench for much of the past 5 days. His current slash: .163/.250/.209/.459 with a 26% K-rate.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
WTF WHY ARE THEY SITTING HIM HE NEEDS TO PLAY!
Matt Graham is an anagram for .... why don't you ask the scrabble expert!
by say hey nation on Jul 6, 2010 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Injured. May play tonight. For the sake of the team lets hope not.
Adopted father of Brian Bocock, Brad Boyer, Sharlon Schoop, Shane Jordan, Jeremiah Luster,Trey Webb,David Quinowski, and Jeff Arnold.
"GM Jack Zduriencik is one of the sharper tools in the shed. Elsewhere in that shed, Brian Sabean continues to pound screws into bricks with a garden rake."
Oh, never thought to check SK.
Too bad.
Q: Did you ever make an offer for Vladimir Guerrero?
Sabean: In a word: No. If we had signed Guerrero or [Gary] Sheffield, we would have been without [Long list of replacement level vets]—obviously not being able to field a competitive team, especially from an experience standpoint, given our level of spending.
Post Fail.
Q: Did you ever make an offer for Vladimir Guerrero?
Sabean: In a word: No. If we had signed Guerrero or [Gary] Sheffield, we would have been without [Long list of replacement level vets]—obviously not being able to field a competitive team, especially from an experience standpoint, given our level of spending.
If RafRod is just sitting on the bench in S-K due to poor performance, he should be sent back to Arizona so that he can get more instruction and playing time. Is it too early to hope that Tommy Joseph is finally getting the hang of pro ball as his average slowly inches upward? Nice to see some well earned promotions – Maday and Pena to AAA, along with Belt to AA. When is Wheeler going to take the hill again? Is Wendell Fairley finally getting the hang of high A ball or just on a mini-hot streak?
I wonder if Maday will get sent back down once Henry Sosa has served his suspension.
by kdl on Jul 6, 2010 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions
fairley
4 doubles in his last 2 games just doubled his xbh output for the entire season (all doubles).
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2010 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, it’s seems like Culby has assumed the role previously held by Belt in SJ (he actually had 2 BBs last night), and Wendell is taking over Culby’s previous role of a high-draftee that may be finally figuring out how to hit with a wood bat.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
hopefully
but he’s still slugging worse than Brock Bond did in SJ.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2010 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Wheeler is slated to pitch in the Future’s Game (same day as the ASG, I believe).
Hector Sanchez: Underrated. Fighting body bias since the 2009 off season. I still love you, son, even if you're fat.
Future’s Game is this Sunday (11th). And given that he hasn’t pitched in a month, I, like others here, would hope he doesn’t actually appear in the game.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
For Rich
What happened to Chris Lofton? He got off to a nice start to his pro career, then disappeared due, I assume to injury though he’s not listed as being on the DL. Any idea what’s wrong with him?
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Strained a hammy diving for a ball in center. He has not been working with the team in pregame warmups though he is dressed, not sure on a timetable. I really like this guy. Excellent speed.
Adopted father of Brian Bocock, Brad Boyer, Sharlon Schoop, Shane Jordan, Jeremiah Luster,Trey Webb,David Quinowski, and Jeff Arnold.
"GM Jack Zduriencik is one of the sharper tools in the shed. Elsewhere in that shed, Brian Sabean continues to pound screws into bricks with a garden rake."
Not sure if anybody’s seen the latest Ask BA, but in the featured question, Jim Callis confirms what I’m sure many of us suspected: the system will take a heady tumble down the organizational rankings this winter:
Now that Buster Posey and Madison Bumgarner are presumably in San Francisco to stay, where would you rank the Giants farm system and who is now their top prospect?
Kent Iverson
Sonoma, Calif.
Posey and Bumgarner were clearly the Giants’ two best prospects entering the season, and quite frankly, none of the minor leaguers we ranked behind them have jumped up to seize the No. 1 spot. Youngsters such as righthander Zack Wheeler and catcher Tommy Joseph have been slow to adjust to low Class A, and Wheeler hasn’t pitched since mid-May with a cracked nail on his right middle finger. Outfielders Thomas Neal and Roger Kieschnick and shortstop Brandon Crawford have found Double-A much less hospitable than the hitter-friendly high Class A California League was a year ago.
First baseman Brandon Belt (.386/.493/.635) and righthander Jorge Bucardo (8-3, 2.23, 82-26 K-BB in 93 IP) are having the best seasons among San Francisco minor leaguers, but neither cracked our Giants Top 30 Prospects list in the 2010 Prospect Handbook. I’d still take Wheeler, who ranked No. 3 on that list, over anyone in the Giants system, even after the eventual signing of Cal State Fullerton outfielder Gary Brown, the club’s first-round pick in the 2010 draft. Wheeler is just 20 and has a chance to have three plus pitches down the road.
We ranked the Giants system fourth overall in our preseason organization talent rankings , but the graduations of Posey and Bumgarner and the leveling off of several other prospects will drop San Francisco several spots when we update that list in the offseason. The Giants should rank around 20th or so.
Wonder if Kent’s a McCoven?
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Honestly, the rising and sinking of the farm system is fine. It doesn’t bother me much at all.
Matt Graham is an anagram for .... why don't you ask the scrabble expert!
by say hey nation on Jul 6, 2010 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
it happens. it’s a good sign that the team is graduating its prospects.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Well in terms of the academic exercise of ranking it’s relatively unimportant. But in this case it is a reflection that both the high end talent and the depth that it looked like we had the last two years has really dried up and disappeared. And given that the major league club still has copious flaws and significant positions manned by aging and/or declining players that’s a significant issue going forward.
ie, if we want to try to trade to upgrade our lineup, we really have very little SP depth to buoy the movement of one of our starters. Next winter we’ll very likely be searching the FA market yet again to try to find a starting SS. With the possible exception of Bowker, we have a dearth of OF prospects who look like they can contribute at the major league level in the next two years, when we could really really use to enhance our OF production.
In other words, I’d say that behind the academic exercise of ranking 30 clubs system, there is a real sign that the roster we’re watching on the field right now will receive minimal production from the system over the next 2, possibly 3 years. And that’s certainly an issue, because this club is getting caught in the in between: too much talent to rebuild and not enough talent to contend.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
You get a lot right, but I don’t totally agree with your 2-year pessimism. Certainly there is a dearth of starting pitching prospects that should be breaking our lineup in the coming 2.5 years. However, SP is not really a weak point for us in SF, while the pen has been an utter disaster outside of Wilson this year. Evaluators rarely give props to relievers in the minors, but you can never have enough quality arms to re-supply your pen at the major league level. If our pen was just performing up to 80% of what they did last year we would probably have 6-10 more wins this year already. I think that there are a ton of potential impact relief pitchers that are going to be ready in 2011 and 2012. I would put guys like Sosa, Edlefsen, Pena, Cova, Stoffel, Casilla and Rosin in this category.
Secondly, I believe that Belt will be in SF by some time in 2011, and that he will be an impact player for us. Is there any doubt that he would be one of the better complete hitters on the current SF roster if he was here right now (and I’m not suggesting that he should be promoted now)?
Finally, I agree that our system lacks overall depth. However, I believe that the depth of our prospects at the lower levels hasn’t been this good in a long time. Our teams below the level of SJ are stacked with legit prospects now that the emphasis the FO has been placing on the Caribbean is finally starting to bear fruit. And don’t forget that Gary Brown, Jarrett Parker, Heath Hembree (and possibly Brandon Allen and Austin Southall) should all be in the fold and playing in the system in 7 weeks or less.
For Callis to say that we would drop to around 20 shows me that he is not familiar with the performance and makeup of our lower-level teams. There’s no way that there would be 19 teams with better systems than us at the end of the year.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Well, generally he’d probably say (and I totally agree here) that any system who’s strength lies in it’s lower levels (particularly it’s rookie leagues) is a system in trouble. And on top of that, I don’t see that our lower level teams are in very good shape. The Augusta team is mostly old for its level, and it’s two serious prospects have 1) not pitched in a month and a half, nor really effectively when he did; and 2) struggled mightily hitting the ball. SK looks pretty bad right now, and the AZL team is typical AZL, a lot of interesting potential to check back on in a couple years (though again, not too much that is particularly young for that league).
I agree Belt is raising all our hopes, but I stand by my dismissal of the organization’s OF depth, and while I’m interested in seeing Brown and wish we’d get him signed, I don’t know that the addition of him and Parker is going to upgrade our system depth much, at least not for another year, say in which time we can evaluate their progress.
I’d also disagree with the relief pitchers comment in two ways — one, there’s very rarely any such thing as an “impact relief pitcher”, and two I don’t see a ton of that group being exceptional relief pitchers in the next two years. Or put another way, it would take more than two years to really evaluate if they’d been impact players. This is somewhat related to the offseason’s arguments over Runzler’s prospect-yness. The pro-Runzler people said he was assured of being an impact productive major leaguer, based on his September appearances, while the con-Runzler group said essentially that he had a history of wonky control that might well reappear at any time, and generally relievers faded in and out of effectiveness and then moved on. Will any of those guys make an appearance on our team in the next couple years? Yeah, maybe two or three will. Will they make an impact? That seems more doubtful to me. I’d say, if one of them does, that will be a very positive thing.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
This system reeks of Sabean
I’d agree with that assessment and the Giants seem to have the same continual problem in developing position players. I don’t know if it’s who they draft or how they’re developed in the minor leagues, but they seem to have a ton of guys who do well in San Jose, but struggle as they progress which isn’t necessarily uncommon, until you factor in that the ones who do progress to AAA and then to the MLB haven’t produced. Obviously, this could be who they’re drafting, but judging from the way prospects are handled upon reaching the MLB level, I have a sneaking suspicion that they’re not being developed properly at the lower levels, but I could be wrong. The Giants system really has taken a hit this year due to some promotions, but also due to the play of some of their prospects, and outside of Bowker I don’t see anyone in there system who will make any kind of impact in 2011, and of course Bowker’s impact will probably be with another team.
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions
there’s very rarely any such thing as an "impact relief pitcher"
I disagree with this as a general statement. Just off the top of my head I can name guys like Storen, David Price, Neftali Perez, Broxton, Bellisario, and Romo from the past few years. And going further back you can find guys like Wilson, Papelbon, Street, and K-Rod, that showed up and made an impact at a young age. What I will agree with you on is that the Giants rarely have had an “impact relief pitcher” from the minor leagues in the BS era. He much prefers to sign aging veteran FAs or trade for them.
As for Runzler, I still believe he can/will be an impact arm in the pen if we can just get rid of Bochy. As he does with all of the young guys (Bowker, Nate, Buster, …) Bochy has totally mis-used Runzler this year and destroyed his confidence. You can’t be an effective pitcher if you know that you’ll be yanked the first time that you walk a hitter.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I’ll also add that I agree with your assertion that relievers tend to swing up and down a lot from year to year. I didn’t mean to imply that the relievers I named from the Giants farm system wouldn’t also run into this same issue. However, I think that we have enough depth of power arms in the system that are close enough to the major leagues that this won’t be a big issue. When 1 or 2 are having a down year others can step in.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I should have said, barring closers. Obviously strong closers can have an impact, but really setup guys rarely do. Wilson was a 2.4 WAR pitcher last year, and is already 1.4 this year. Romo’s career value is 1.8 WAR. David Price provided 0.2 WAR in his late year relief efforts two years ago, as a starter he’s given the Rays 1.6 and so far this year 2.1.
Or looked at another way, Jonathan Sanchez has provided 1.6 WAR for the Giants this year. Casilla, Runzler, Mota, Romo, Affeldt, Bautista, Ray, Joaquin and Meddars combined have provided 1.0. If I take out Joaquin and Meddars negative productivity it’s still only 1.3 from the combined middle and set up relief corps. That’s what I was getting at when I said there’s rarely an impact relief pitcher.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Your point got me thinking about non-closer relief pitchers who had big impacts so I looked up good setup men I remember:
Mariano Rivera in 1996: 4.4 WAR
Francisco Rodriguez in 2004: 4.0 WAR (I assume he wasn’t the closer this year, he only had 12 saves)
Giants:
Mike Jackson 1993: 0.8 WAR (funny because he seemed awesome at the time)
Felix Rodriguez 2001: 2.2 WAR
Julian Tavarez: -.04 WAR for his career with the Giants
The Giants don’t fare well against pitchers.
I’m not a big believer in using WAR to judge relievers, especially non-closers. I guess you are. Logically, I just don’t buy that Brian Wilson only was responsible for 2.4 more wins than the average closer would have gotten us last year. I think we would have lost a lot more than 3 games if we had just an average closer rather than Wilson. From my point of view, it always seems that when a reliever (other than the mop-up/blow-out guy) fails it’s usually so late in the game that it’s very hard for the offense to recover from. Not only that, but it’s more psychologically damaging to a team.
The other thing that I’m too lazy to give specifics on, is that every year it seems to me that the teams with the best-performing bullpens (give or take a few) are usually the ones that make the playoffs.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I think that’s true (that a good bullpen is a key to teams having successful seasons) but I think that’s different from saying that individual middle relievers are themselves impactful. The bullpen en masse can be an important part of a team’s success, but note that even in teams with annually successful bullpens (San Diego for instance) those bullpens are mostly a cast of changing characters, with maybe one or two guys at the end who are stable.
As for WAR, I just needed some way to quantify the statement. Otherwise, you’re just left with a “feeling” (remember that one game!) which isn’t so conducive to a debate. Would we have lost a lot more than 3 games without Wilson last year? I know a lot of prognosticators said the same about the Twin’s loss of Joe Nathan this year, but I don’t see how you could make the case, and frankly Rauch hasn’t been much different from the mediocre pitcher he’s ever been (although he has nicely cut his walks down significantly this year).
Going back to your original statement, you disagreed with my pessimistic view that we weren’t going to be getting much help from our system in the next two years, by saying you expected “a ton of impact relievers to be ready” which seemed to me hyperbolic both in its valuation of the role of relief pitchers and in the value of the various pitchers you named. Could two or three of those guys pitch on the team in the next two years? Sure. Could two or three of them spend an entire year (in other words really be a presence) in the next two seasons? Perhaps. Could two or three of them produce dominant, impact seasons far superior to the kinds of relievers Sabean comes up with frequently with his winter dumpster diving? I’m pretty skeptical on that.
For the record I’d say, Stoeffel and Casilla probably have relief careers in front of them, Stoeffel may be by the second half of the 2012 season, Casilla maybe 2013. Pena and Rosin its too soon to say. Edlefsen, and Cova I don’t think will be major league pitchers. Sosa, they seem to be trying in starting role again, hasn’t had a lot of success this year. Not sure what to think of him at this point, though he might have some relief years ahead of them. Will any of that group ever make it to, say, free agency (which is my thumbnail landmark for having “made it” as a major leaguer)? Maybe one will, but I wouldn’t want to try to guess which one.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Keep in mind . . .
. . . that the average major-league pitcher throws 70% of his innings scoreless. Then keep in mind that by no means do all save situations require a completely scoreless inning. Then note that Wilson’s save percentage (career) is 86%, in line with what most successful closers get. DTM.
As many have suggested (and I heartily believe), “closing” is by no means the optimum use of a team’s best reliever, because many men can achieve what a “closer” does when used in that same thoroughly artificial manner.
Professional baseball analyst since 1980.
I’m interested in seeing Brown and wish we’d get him signed, I don’t know that the addition of him and Parker is going to upgrade our system depth much
A couple of things about this statement.
1. In all likelihood Brown’s signing can’t be announced until the deadline, because he’ll be over-slot and the Giants won’t want to defy the MLB front office. The same will probably be true of Parker.
2. To say that Brown and Parker’s addition won’t upgrade our system depth much until next year doesn’t bear out with what has happened in prior years. The minute Wheeler and Joseph were signed last year they vaulted into our top 5 and top 10 prospects list, respectively, before they even got in a game. Their presence in the system was surely used by evaluators when assigning such a high ranking to our farm system after last season was ended. And the same held true for every team that signed 2009 draft picks at the deadline. Now, I agree with you that draftees should not be rated so highly before they even pick up a ball and bat, but that’s not how systems get ranked by guys like Callis.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
But that doesn’t necessarily upgrade the system relative to the other 29 teams who all also have 1st and 2nd (and in some cases multiple 1st and/or 2nd) round picks to add to their crops. The question will be more along the lines of how do Brown and Parker compare to other organizations top end talent picked up in the draft, and given that a lot of people were somewhat meh on our draft this year, I’d guess the answer to that question will also be a resounding meh. And since, again, Brown’s not going to get in a lot of playing time to turn people’s heads (like say Mike Trout did last year), people will have to judge him on his pre-draft reputation.
Also, just for the record, you’re not agreeing with me because I do think that the scouting profile of top picks should weigh heavily on their prospect status. It’s just that Brown isn’t a guy who was that highly perceived on a lot of boards. Some people, including our people apparently, liked him a lot, some scouts liked him more than Colon, but others thought he was a bit of a reach at 24. All in all not the kind of player who’s going to buoy a system’s reputation without stepping on the field.
As for his signing, this year is turning out to be a year in which a lot of 1st rounders get in quick and start playing, including #4 pick, teammate and fellow Boras client Colon, so it would be nice to see Brown signed and on the field. I don’t really see where he’s got a tremendous bargaining position to go much over slot, particularly in this environment.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
I think that Colon must have just forced Boras to accept slot and not play his usual games, because Colon wanted to get on the field right away. He could have gotten a lot more if he held out until Aug. 16th. Can you believe that Grant Green got the same amount from the A’s last year at #13, that Colon got at #4. That’s got to really frost Boras. I think that it’s obvious though, that anybody that doesn’t sign in the next 2 weeks or so is going to be an over-slot bonus at the deadline.
I’ve been amazed at how many HS kids have signed at or below slot already. For example, Mike Foltynewicz (#19) signed quickly for only $1.4M – which was $1.5M less than what the Cards gave the 19th pick, Shelby Miller, last year even though they’re both HS pitchers. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s a good move for a young pitcher to get into the system early, but it sure goes against the recent trend for HS prospects.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
I think after you get past the top 3 picks, over slot signings are going to be much less over slot than in years past — overslot by tens of thousands or maybe a hundred grand ceiling, but there won’t be the the million dollar overslot deals we’ve seen in the past. The talent was just so muddled this year.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Something that confuses me...
How much does winning percentage play into BA’s organizational rankings? If I’m not wrong, didn’t SJ and Fresno win their division, and Augusta came in a close second? Also, it seems like the DSL Gigantes aren’t too bad (2nd in division).
Seems like the rankings are more focused on the trees (stand out players) than the forest (competitive teams).
Proud of both my adopted son, Baggs, and my ward, Ryan LOLlis.
Yes, that’s right. Generally winning percentage in the minor leagues has no correlation to future help for the major league team. It’s sometimes even an indication of the lack of strength of a system, as the Giants for instance have frequently been accused of stacking minor league teams with older players who are repeating leagues (or in the case, for instance of Clay Timpner and now Joe Borchard, going down to levels they first played in years ago).
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Yeah, evaluators don’t, and shouldn’t, look at winning percentages at all. The Giants, on the other hand (at least in the later part of the BS era), seem to want their farm teams to remain in good fiscal condition, and so they do the little things (and some big things) to keep them in the pennant races for as long as possible.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
LOL Bowker
Career Triple-A player
"Even the Swedes are getting mad."-Randy Hahn
"It's very cozy in the sin bin."-Randy Hahn
Don’t worry. He’ll be a star for Toronto sooner or later.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 6, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah...
Just like that Kevin Frandsen guy who’s currently hitting .324 for the Angels, somehow this story sounds familiar….BORK!
by Giant Torture on Jul 6, 2010 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Culberson, Adrianza, Noonan, Crawford, Burriss, Bond
where do you guys see these middle infielders playing in 2011? sure looks like it’s starting to get crowded in the upper minors…
by TimLaser and MattyC on Jul 6, 2010 11:14 AM PDT reply actions
Bond it seems that he’s been relegated to a bench role behind Burriss and Downs.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Bond was used as a DH for a couple of games in the Sacramento series, which I thought was interesting. He played 3B a couple nights ago. But, last night, Manny was at SS, Downs at 2B and Rohlinger at 3B. I know they’ve been trying Downs and Rohlinger at multiple positions to see what they can do, and I’m not sure what will happen with Manny. But, it definitely looks like those guys are still the focus.
BS still love Burriss
I believe that he’ll give Manny plenty of chance to make the opening day roster next year.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
/swings at ball outside strike zone
//ball knocks bat out of hands
///shows amazing speed back to dugout
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 6, 2010 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Impossible to say
Doesn’t it all depend on if Bochy and BS are still running the show next year, and beyond? If BS is still around next year it appears that Burriss will have the inside track to take over at SS next year, although he may also try to re-sign Uribe. Ohter than that, I see Downs and Rohlinger as guys that Bochy rates higher than any of the other guys you listed.
I see Crawford and Bond starting in Fresno next year, and Culby, Noonan and Ehire playing in Richmond. Noonan runs the risk of losing playing time to Culby if Culby is able to maintain a .300 average and keep a cap on his Ks this year.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Burriss? Like, Emmanuel Burriss? Really?
by AndOnTheDrums... on Jul 6, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
My guess:
Culberson, Richmond
Adrianza, Richmond
Noonan, RIchmond
Crawford, Fresno
Burriss, San Francisco
Bond, Fresno
Yeah, but what happens in May when they’re forced to send Burriss back to Fresno?
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
LOL
Burriss looks totally out of shape to me. I would much prefer Rohlinger.
by kdl on Jul 6, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions
I really like brandon belt
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, hacker extraordinaire. Rescuing moribund Giants lineups since 2008
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
/mentions fantasy baseball team
The man is not getting enough hype from the Giants or outside
I mean, this is basically what Sandoval did 2 years ago right? Just absolutely set every level he played at, on fire and forced the Giants to call him up – going from A ball to the majors in a year. Aren’t Belt’s numbers better than Pablo’s were?
Proud adoptee of Dick Tidrow the mastermind behind Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain, Buster Posey and many more. Also known as "The Reason".
Forget about it.
1B is totally overcrowded this year, anyway
The money lies in the RBIs
-- Jeff Kent
Sure, Ishikawa may not keep it up, but as long as he can hit anywhere near .306/.358/.531 with plus D, I’m totally happy he’s in the lineup
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 6, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions
What's the timetable on him
His name is Bond, Brock Bond, and his adopted father? ME, any questions?
You really think he'd be able to take over at 1st NOW? i mean, what about time in AAA?
His name is Bond, Brock Bond, and his adopted father? ME, any questions?
Pablo skipped AAA as well
The Giants really need to take advantage of their legitimate prospects
No more bullshitting the fans with washed-up vets like LOLwand
He's already at AA
Why would he need to go down a level?
Proud adoptee of Dick Tidrow the mastermind behind Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain, Buster Posey and many more. Also known as "The Reason".
I know we all make fun of BS for his AAA comments, but there is truth to it.
Matt Graham is an anagram for .... why don't you ask the scrabble expert!
by say hey nation on Jul 6, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Clark was special. not many guys can jump to the majors after a half season in A+. Of course, that he did is part of what makes him special. He was also a golden spikes winner and #5 overall pick.
I like Belt, but we should probably see more than just 3 games above A+ before declaring him ready.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm just saying maybe wait until the end of July or even August
Pablo had nothing left to prove in AA, and if Belt keeps it up, he has nothing left to prove
His name is Bond, Brock Bond, and his adopted father? ME, any questions?
Well, now I’ll take a backseat to nobody when it comes to appreciating Sandoval, but to say he “had nothing left to prove in AA” seems to overstate things a bit to me. He only played in AA for 44 games, so if, say the Giants had been brain-numbingly awful in August of ‘08 and they’d left him to play in AA for a while longer, things he could have proved in that time could have been:
1) that he could develop a more advanced approach to hitting than “swing at everything possible”
2) that he could hit left-handed pitching (his platoon splits that year were very bad)
3) that he could sustain his hot hitting for a full season (in the event, he proved this by continuing his success at the major league level after his call up, but this is something that all players at all levels are always struggling with, as Panda has been forced to reckon with this year. For the record, I’m glad at this point that he had that awful awful year at Augusta, so that he has experience with real failure and finding his way back from it).
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
I guess the “NOW” threw me off.
Pablo also had nearly 5 years in pro ball up to that point that could be evaluated. But under the current circumstances, such as the team being contenders, they aren’t likely to call up Belt at any point this year, even if he continues to rake in AA.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 6, 2010 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions
How does Burriss look?
To me he is important. He is a quality defensive middle infielder with great speed. If Uribe is hurt or if the Giants move Renteria, they need to bring up a SS. Rohlinger is not the answer and I fear Crawford is not going to be ready until 2012. Thus to me Burriss is important.
So for those of you watching Fresno, how does he look???
Looks a little pudgy from recent pix
But I think it’s cuz he’s been injured for so long
I definitely agree Burriss is an upgrade over Diarrhea
brian bocock is an upgrade over edgar right now
Adopted Nut: Paraparaumu, New Zealand native, Andy Skeels
Burriss is “important” only insofar as there isn’t anyone else who sucks less than he does in the system.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 6, 2010 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions

by 






















