Trading for a shortstop

Here's a thong-clad Orson Welles thought while you're enjoying that rosterbation: It's really, really unlikely that the Giants are going to make a substantial trade. The swap-a-pitcher-for-a-Brewer partisans have retreated into the hills, bloodied and beaten. No one thinks like that in this oh-so-enlightened era. And when two mediocre-to-useless players take up a third of the payroll, trading six years of a low-priced Brandon Belt for anything but another cost-controlled player is a terrible idea.

If there's a trade, it's going to be boring. Some of the shortstops on the trade market:

Chris Haft threw his name out there in a chat, and even though it's a miserable idea, it's worth mentioning here just to point out that his OPS+ of 88 last year would have been the second-best in the 2010 Mariners lineup. They should give Felix Hernandez next year's Cy Young just for reaching 10 wins.

Fangraphs has Betancourt as the second-worst starting shortstop in baseball. That's about right.

He'll be 35, and his secret weapon is that he'll work out 10 to 20 walks every season that other shortstops might not. His defense is usually a little below-average according to UZR. That's worth, uh, let's see what have here, a stack of National Geographics, a Mario/Duck Hunt split cartridge, one of those weird, nonperishable Italian box cakes, and, uh, Chris Ray. Take it or leave it.

He's a sexy choice -- sexy in that "cellmate without open sores" kind of way -- because he's supposed to be a slick fielder, but UZR is turning on him. If he isn't fielding at an elite level, he's not an especially valuable player, especially since he'll probably make $5M or $6M in his final year of arbitration.

Brandon Belt, Matt Cain, Zack Wheeler, Thomas Neal, Pablo Sandoval, Buster Posey, and Stephen Drew (traded right back to Arizon for a PTBNL) should make this deal happen.

"So what would it take to give us the cheap version of the $5M player you want to dump? Yello? Yell-o?"

Reyes was about as valuable as Uribe last year if you believe that WAR is good for absolutely something. Reyes's health is iffy, he'll make $11M next season, and the Mets aren't just going to give him away. Unless I'm completely misreading what the Mets would want, it would probably take Belt.

If we could just make a little switcheroo, I'd be all for it. But if the Mets would accept second-tier prospects, other teams would jump in with better second-tier prospects. If the Mets are holding out for first-tier prospects, the Giants can't/shouldn't compete with other teams either. Even if the Giants wanted Reyes, I don't see how they get him without grossly overpaying.

So we're back here. If teams won't just give us a shortstop, it's Uribe, Uribe, Uribe. And if Uribe goes elsewhere, the Giants should seriously consider re-signing Edgar Renteria. This is where we're at. This is the paucity of the shortstop market. Because the alternative is starting Manny Burriss or Brandon Crawford, at which point the Giants should just sign Cesar Izturis -- he'll give the Giants a .550 OPS without screwing up the development of any youngsters.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.