Give Barry a Ring!

But Barry doesn’t. The point being is that there is no definitive way to determine this and even if there were it would only matter in a game of Trivial Pursuit, seeing as that it can never have any impact on any real baseball game now or in the future or in the past.

It simply doesn’t matter in the real world and to use this opportunity to take a shot at Bonds is petty, and smacks of media brainwashing. The “anti-2002” team is a hallucination created by some bitter media hacks who will take every opportunity to fling their dung at Bonds, that they can. Just like the chimps at the zoo. And you’re simply echoing and repeating what they have written and what has been blurted on ESPN by the guys who have hated Bonds since he was in Pittsburgh.

I saw them both. And I saw more of Mays then Bonds. Mays was great. And he excelled against great players. And Mays played several years with four other hall of famers in the same lineup. Bonds played with good players and the one time he did play with a future HOF, he and Kent drove the Giants to WS with a pitching staff about half as good as this one. Bonds dominated that world series too.

He posted one of the most dominant World Series of all time in 2002 with slash lines of :

BAT .471 OBP .700 SLG 1.294 OPS 1.994

And I don’t think Mays ever dominated games, the way Bonds did. Bonds simply destroyed opponents game plans, and bullpen management. And that was even after he lost his wheels for good during the 2004 season

No Pacbell. No World Series.

The end.

And Bonds was not rewarded. He was driven out by the media crazies and an 18th century style judicial witchunt with the full blessing of Bud Selig and one of the most vile cretins to ever darken the hallways of the US Senate

I suggest you do your homework because what you just wrote sounds incredibly stupider.