FanPost

Taking a pitch: A short look at the failings of the SF Giants



The Giants are an awful, awful offensive team; this isn't much in dispute. You can scream about it (and I have - if  I had to pay a quarter for every time I've sworn here, I could pay off Renteria's contract), but there are limitations to what an awful team can do to improve its raw hitting ability as it, were. Nonetheless, the single most frustrating thing about this team is that the hitters repeatedly show a complete and total lack of patience - and worse, the idiots running the team (Bochy, Carney, Dunston) seem to do nothing about it. 

 

A look at the numbers, to start, with the Optimist and the Realist:

Realist: Just how bad, are the Giants offensively? Coming into the game, lets look at the simplest measure - OBP. Major league baseball:

1. Yankees - .359

2. Dodgers - .353

3. Angels - .351

4. Indians - .349

5. Rays - .349

...

Avg: .333

...

28.Royals - .314

29.  Reds - .310

30: Giants - .310

 

Optimist: OBP is a measure that is still heavily dependent on hitting; the Giants suck, but their low OBP is a product of them not hitting well, not a lack of patience. All the magic in the world can't teach Edgar Renteria to hit a Jonathan Broxton fastball, or allow Scott to hit a slider. 

Realist:  Pure hitting suckage? Heathen. Lets look at team BB instead

1. Yankees - 471

2. Rays - 468

3. Red Sox  - 460

4. Rockies - 445

5. Nationals - 441

...

Avg: 383

...

28. Royals - 302

29. Mariners - 296

30: Giants - - 248

 

Realist: Lets ponder the depths of the Giants putridity at taking a walk here, shall we? Not only does the team rank dead last in baseball in BB's, they have a 20% deficit as compared to the team in 29th place.

...

Optimist: Well, maybe the lack of walks is a product of them taking pitches, but not taking good pitches - right? There's got to be some upside to the number of pitches they take, right? Please god, right? Oh god, you're pulling out another data table aren't you?


Pessimist: ....

P/PA

 

1.Rockies - 3.99

2. Rays - 3.98

3. Indians - 3.95

...

Avg: 3.84

...

28. Braves - 3.69

29. Cardinals - 3.66

...

30. Giants - 3.60

Optimist: (now flailing around for an excuse): while this team is awful at taking walks, they must make up for it in some way; they get the ball into play, hustling and grittying like the veteran-savvy team they are. Why, I bet they get the ball into play a lot. Nerd - they don't K, they play baseball the right way. Why don't you go back into your mom's basement?

Pessimist: in my mom's basement, I looked at the  BB/K statistics. For funsies.

BB / K ratio.

1. Yankees - 0.69

2. Mets - 0.65

3. Red Sox - 0.59

4. Dodgers - 0.59

...

27. Mariners - 0.42

28. Royals - 0.41

29. Rangers - 0.36

...

30. Giants - 0.31

 

Optimist (sobs uncontrollably):  Make the bad man stop showing me numbers!

Pessimist: just one more set. yes... just one more set. And because I don't know HTML (hey, I never said I was a good nerd), I'll just link directly to the source.

http://www.fangraphs.com/teams.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&type=5&season=2009&month=0

For reference, lets look at:

a. O-Swing (% of pitches swung at outside the zone)

1. Yankees - 21.9%

2. Dodgers - 22.4%

3. Indians - 22.5%

4. Brewers - 22.7%

...

27. Astros - 27.4%

28. Rangers - 28.1%

29. Mariners - 29.1%

30. Giants -  31.9%

 

b. F-Strike (first strike %, or how often the teams hitters are at an 0-1 count)

1. Phillies - 55.5%

2. Yankees - 56.0%

3. Orioles - 56.8%

4. Indians - 57.1%

...

27. Twins - 58.9%

28. Reds - 60.5%

29. Rangers - 60.6%

30. Giants - 61.0%

 

Optimist: Okay, just so I'm clear here, you're  suggesting the the Giants are dead last in:

- taking pitches

- BB's,

- OBP,

- first-strike counts,

- and swinging at pitches in the strike zone.


And thus potentially, a team that hacks at eveyrthing, thus leading itself into bad counts, takes just enough pitches to strike out but not to walk, usually swings at a first pitch outside the zone, thus leading to being on the defensive for the rest of the AB's, is responsible for its offensive problem?You're also suggesting that despite this analysis which could your average 3- year crack baby could understand, the team's approach has been to rank dead-last in pitches per plate appearance and swing at everything in sight?

Pessimist: Yes.

Optimist: But does it capture Rich Aurillia's grit and veteran moxey?

Pessimist (shoots optimist).

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Join McCovey Chronicles

You must be a member of McCovey Chronicles to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at McCovey Chronicles. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker