Season half over...about those predictions
After 81 games, I think we're all probably pretty pleased with the teams current record. Their on a pace to win 88 games, which makes this a good time to re-visit our pre-season predictions .
Looking back at your prediction for the Giants, would you change it now if you could?
I picked the Giants to win 87 games and win the division. 87 still sounds pretty good, but I don't think that would overtake the Dodgers.
The Giants might have played over their heads a little in the first half, but the should be able to do at least as well in the 2nd half:
* They play more games at home in the 2nd half
* They've played better (31-24) since opening the season 13-13
* The lineup looks better since the early on with Nate and Uribe in the lineup and Renteria and Ishikawa looking better
* They have the potential to improve even more by adding a bat
What say you all?
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
1 recs |
56 comments
Comments
I think the dbacks win the division with 90-94 wins and the Giants finish somewhere around .500 along with the Bums and the Rockies and the Padres lose about 100.
OMG I’M ORIGINAL!
hmmm about that.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.
by jponry on Jul 5, 2009 10:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL Dbacks.
Judgment Day is coming
comics | art | Nattowear
by Natto on Jul 5, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dodgers: 87 wins
Dbacks: 86 wins
Giants: 79 wins
Rockies: 76 wins
Padres: 62 wins
…
That Padres prediction looks pretty good!
GROUGTHINK ALERT
by groug on Jul 5, 2009 10:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Diamondbacks just screwed all this up.
Bruce Bochy would like you to look at the career numbers and stop complaining.
by cheno on Jul 5, 2009 10:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yup
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 5, 2009 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
they lost Brandon Webb and Conor Jackson, which hurt. Also, they’re pretty horrible on defense.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 5, 2009 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Chris Young decided to pursue other walks of life, apparently.
Bruce Bochy would like you to look at the career numbers and stop complaining.
by cheno on Jul 5, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anybody have:
-Dodgers – Ridiculously best team in the majors
-Giants – 2nd Best team in the NL but still 7+ back of the Dodgers
Anybody? Anybody? Beuller?
Status: So pissed that the Giants sold my wall of Ks to Johnsonville Sausages, that I'm boycotting purchasing anything at the park, or patronizing their sponsors.
by GiantBrass on Jul 5, 2009 11:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty dumbfounded at this point. I definitely expected this team to be between 5-10 games under .500 for most of the season. It seems to be mostly smoke mirrors, with an unhittable Lincecum, a great Matt Cain, and a pretty good bullpen thrown in.
I can’t bring myself to go all Lars and stick to a sub 80 wins prediction, but I will say a playoff appearance is not what I’m expecting this season. It has laid a foundation of lofty hopes for next season, certainly.
Billy Ripken is not a fuck face
by Karlifornia on Jul 6, 2009 2:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I meant smoke and mirrors. I don’t know what smoke mirrors are, although they sound awesome.
Billy Ripken is not a fuck face
by Karlifornia on Jul 6, 2009 2:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, what's Karlifornia smoking?
Mirrors
"The BB's are out. The BB's are being arseholes to me." - Brian Wilson.
by hairball on Jul 6, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never posted my predictions (I think) but I had them at about 75-87. I didn’t think they would smell .500.
by SFGuy on Jul 6, 2009 2:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Still think there’s “no way” the Giants win 90?
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Jul 6, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know anymore. I guess it’s possible considering everyone in the National League but Washington and Arizona are pretty equal.
by SFGuy on Jul 7, 2009 1:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am happy and proud that my ridiculously pessimistic prediction on the Giants was so completely off-base. Well, not so much proud really… but happy! Very very happy.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
by Roger on Jul 6, 2009 5:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bah
Even Xei had his Dodgers at 86 wins. They’ve had too many things go right for them this year, not the least of which was Juan Pierre super sub. I had the Giants at .500 which I felt was optimistic at the time….Wooo Hoooo to having even more optimism mid season!
by paboperfecto on Jul 6, 2009 5:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t see my post in that particular thread, but I think I predicted the Giants to go 88-74, because I expected them to hang around .500, and then I expected Sabean to do something at the deadline to improve the team. A couple of people asked me what I was drinking, but I’m always optimistic at the start of the baseball season. However, I thought the Dbacks and Dodgers would be really good so I was pretty sure that that record would only get us third place.
Proud new dad of Edgardo errr Edgar Renteria!!!
by rxmeister on Jul 6, 2009 5:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I, too, didn’t foresee the collapse of the Diamondbacks (I had them winning the West – ouch). But I’m pretty happy with the rest of my predictions, and I’ll stand by my prediction of 83 wins for the Giants. We’ve been pretty lucky so far, particularly in avoiding injuries. I dont’ see Randy Johnson going 8-5 in the second half, Zito will still be Zito, and who knows with Sadowski?
That being said, I’m happy with where the Giants are in their development process.
I’m disappointed in the Rockies, who I had as one game ahead of us. I expected their pitching to solidify this year (hello, Jason Marquis!) while their hitting stayed at a high level. Oh well.
Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!
by Lyle on Jul 6, 2009 6:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Considering the new questions RJ's shoulder raised
I am sticking to 79 wins.
by Lars The Wanderer on Jul 6, 2009 7:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If RJ’s shoulder wasn’t injured, would you really change that prediction?
GROUGTHINK ALERT
by groug on Jul 6, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably not. I’d find another excuse.
by Lars The Wanderer on Jul 6, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good idea :-D
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
If Dustin Pedroia played in Seattle, not many people would be talking about him.
GET THAT VORP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
by baetown415 on Jul 6, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently I missed that thread
but somewhere I predicted 76-86 and a third place finish for the Giants behind the DBacks and the Dodgers.
I’m not feeling too good about that prediction at the moment, especially the DBacks winning the division.
Adopted brother of Jason Jarvis.
by j14 on Jul 6, 2009 9:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
my predictions were...
not pretty, in other words, ugly.
LA- 88
Dbacks- 86
Giants- 75
Rockies-72
Pads-60
by sfoakbay on Jul 6, 2009 10:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m the asshole who is going to say it.
Dodgers: 94-68
Giants: 90-72
Giants win the NL Wild Card and play the Dodgers in the first round.
Game 1: Lincecum v. Billingsley
Game 2: Johnson v. Wolf
Game 3: Cain v. Billingsley
Game 4: Zito v. Kuroda
I think we have a great shot in this series. Sabean announced today (according to Baggs and MLBTradeRumors that he is calling up Bowker soon, so hopefully this is reasonable).
by gimpsta7 on Jul 6, 2009 10:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Can't play the Dodgers in the first round
Could be the NLCS if both teams survive the first round, though.
Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.
by EliminateMe on Jul 6, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really? I thought the team with the best record played the wild card.
by gimpsta7 on Jul 6, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not if they’re in the same division.
Judgment Day is coming
comics | art | Nattowear
by Natto on Jul 6, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s why the Rays didn’t play the Red Sox in the first round last year.
Judgment Day is coming
comics | art | Nattowear
by Natto on Jul 6, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah. Missed that part. Im not a fan of that come to think of it. But oh well. Whoever we play, I’d take those 3 and be pretty happy about it. Lincecum pitching a game 5 if needed. Man…
by gimpsta7 on Jul 6, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sabean announced today (according to Baggs and MLBTradeRumors that he is calling up Bowker soon, so hopefully this is reasonable).
Do you have a specific link, because I could not find that specific information on either of those sites.
by Squire_Boone on Jul 6, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, link needed
The only thing I’ve seen re: Bowker is the quote from Bobby Evans on Sunday that Bowker will NOT be brought up until there’s room for him to play F/T. Therefore, if Sabean was saying that Bowker will be brough up soon, that would definitely suggest a trade, which would be big news, so LINK PLEASE!!
"The BB's are out. The BB's are being arseholes to me." - Brian Wilson.
by hairball on Jul 6, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_12755238
The last line says:
Sabean also told KNBR that he hopes to promote scalding-hot John Bowker from Triple-A Fresno shortly.
by The Double Deuce on Jul 6, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
“Hopes to” being the key words. Not “plans to” or “is going to”.
by The Double Deuce on Jul 6, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This deserves its own fanshot
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Jul 6, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I predicted Pablo Sandoval was not ready to play in the big leagues. This may possibly prove to have been incorrect.
by Evan on Jul 6, 2009 11:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Small Sample Size!
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jul 6, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't apply
Pablo is a Large Sample of Awesome!
Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.
by EliminateMe on Jul 6, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
BODY BIAS
Judgment Day is coming
comics | art | Nattowear
by Natto on Jul 6, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
AWESOMENESS BIAS
Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.
by EliminateMe on Jul 6, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The big leagues are not ready to play in Pablo Sandoval!
El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."
by ResDog on Jul 6, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had them at 90-72
Since they are now on pace for 88, booyah!
However, I also had them as the NL West winner but who would have thought those Dildodgers would be where they are now while Manny was out for 50 games! If Giants are playing way over their head now, LA is probably playing in the solar space. D-backs are utter disappointments and Rockies are a nice surprise so far – Padres was as expected.
As for the second half, keep playing well at home (.666 now) and .500 ball on the road will send these G-men into the p-word.
Mo'ped Money, Mo'ped Problems
by Scooter Ellis on Jul 6, 2009 12:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agreed with Cookyman’s 79 wins. I blame my pessimism on the consumption of too much pie.
El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."
by ResDog on Jul 6, 2009 1:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s all Lars’s fault.
Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry.
:-(
by Cookyman on Jul 6, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could have predicted that my predictive powers suck. Even the Padres aren’t quite as bad as I expected them to be.
I pegged the Giants for 79 wins, and I’m not going to jinx anything by changing that now. They do have two very tough road trips coming up after the ASG (10-game through Pittsburgh, Atlanta and Colorado in July; 11-game at New York, Cincinnati and Colorado in August) but they played well on the road against the Brewers and Cardinals, so I don’t know what to think.
Overall, really happy with the way the Giants have played, but disappointed that Freddy Lewis and Dirty Sanchez haven’t turned into the players I hoped/thought they would. :(
"He is Tim Lincecum...the Most Interesting Pitcher in the World."
by Kitspool on Jul 6, 2009 3:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I didn't post, apparently
But my mantra in spring was that the Giants had a real shot at .500. At the time, that was meant to be optimistic, but now I’m really afraid they’ll fall back to .500 and prove me right!
Really, the question should have been, HOW MANY MVP AWARDS WILL PANDA WIN THIS YEAR? I’m going for 12.
No, really, I have updated my blog this year: http://skaldheim.livejournal.com/tag/baseball
by Skaldheim on Jul 6, 2009 10:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think they’ve once and for all escaped the gravitational pull of .500
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Jul 7, 2009 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember my prediction for Fred Lewis :-(
And Kevin Frandsen
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
If Dustin Pedroia played in Seattle, not many people would be talking about him.
GET THAT VORP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
by baetown415 on Jul 7, 2009 10:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel your pain on Lewis. I thought they would basically leave him alone and he would hit a combined total over 30 between homers & triples.
Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.
by daveinexile on Jul 7, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I too picked giants to win 79. I’m glad they’ve overperformed err I mean improved!
Also the rox are probably going to be near .500
The only thing I might be right on is the padres.
apparently the adoptive parent of the 2nd best hitter on the team.
/shrug
by lincypoo i wuv u on Jul 7, 2009 1:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















