McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

My Radical Trade Proposal


It's radical.

Star-divide

Okay, so the Giants are in contention. We all know that. We're a whole game and a half up on the wild card, and it's already July (it has been for an hour)! But we have a terrible offense, and if we want to stay in contention we'd better trade for a bat. So here's what we do:

 

First, we trade no one to Florida for no one. Then we trade no one to Oakland for no one. After that, trade no one to Houston for no one, and finish off by trading no one to Texas for no one.

Brilliant, right? I believe that at this point, we have a team that can contend. This is enough. Coming into this season, we weren't thinking contention until at LEAST 2010, and probably 2011 when Bumgarner and Alderson will be in the rotation. And yes, I suppose this is a feeling that is borne out of 7-0, 10-0, 6-3 and masterful pitching the last three days, but honestly, we've got a fairly decent lineup that probably won't carry us into the postseason, but who cares? We weren't supposed to get close to the postseason this year, and I'd rather not trade Posey, Villanola, MadBum or Tim2 for a rental. Because honestly, if we want to make it for sure, we need an impact bat. And that's going to take one of the four.

At this point, we've got Sandoval, Molina, Schierholtz, Renteria, Winn, Ishikawa, Rowand, and Uribe/Downs comprising our weakest element, the lineup, and frankly, I'm not too unhappy. Sure, none of these guys are hitters who will make the opposing pitcher crap himself, but if you get league-average production (which we do from at least 6/8 of the lineup) with this pitching staff, you could go somewhere. And if you sell the farm to buy a guy who will take you somewhere, what does that mean for next year? Or 2011? I'd rather flirt with contending now (which I say again, no one expected) than lose in the NLDS or the NLCS or the WS (because we won't go all the way, that's just not going to happen) and have to spend the next five years rebuilding again.

Poll
Who should we trade?
No one
48 votes
Definitely no one
21 votes
Someone, but don't listen to me, I'm an idiot
71 votes
Bruce Bochy
75 votes

215 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs  |  Comment 147 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'd like to trade someone

Just for fun. Maybe one of those lefty outfielders. I’m getting bored with this lineup.

by DesertFox on Jul 1, 2009 1:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Boy, we start scoring runs and people get bored with the offense.

Proud father of Juan Carlos Perez. Think Albert Pujols at second.

by marcello on Jul 1, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like to see how Jack Bowker does in this lineup prior to trading for another OF. If Sabean can pull off another IF bat without mortgaging the farm, go for it!

by wilriv21 on Jul 1, 2009 2:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

IAWWR21

El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."

by ResDog on Jul 1, 2009 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

IAWRDAWWR21

Minor White > Ansel Adams

by say hey nation on Jul 1, 2009 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ALL ABOARD!!!!

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL. I made a fanpost just now that echoed most of your sentiments. After I published it, I saw yours and clicked it, and said “Oh, fuck me, he got to my idea first”.

Man…what a bummer that is.

Billy Ripken is not a fuck face

by Karlifornia on Jul 1, 2009 2:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

For me it’s not a question of who to trade or where to trade them, instead it’s a matter of the timing of the trade. If we get to maybe a week before the trading deadline and seem to be an absolute sure-fire lead pipe cinch to make the playoffs (and consequently able to align the starting rotation for the first playoff series), then yeah, look for the missing piece and prepare to pay the price for it.

The Giants chances of advancing in the playoffs depend solely on getting the ball to Timmeh and Matteh in the first round on proper rest and every round thereafter. If there’s an actual stretch run where we might need to use either or both to clinch in the last 2 or 3 days of the season, then our chances would be much poorer and we should just accept bowing out in the Division Series, but with team and prospects intact.

Fred Lewis can stand under my umbrella.
31 May 2007, 21:38 EST - the last time Matteh's career W-L wasn't below .500
We are at war with Los Angeles. We have always been at war with Los Angeles.
Lowering the Quality of Internet Discourse Since 1985™

by S.F. Giangst on Jul 1, 2009 2:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Damn I voted no trade when I actually do want the Giants to trade someone

Randy Winn, so they can call up John Bowker and still have Freddie and Torres as backup.

Justin Miller: More ink'd than an octopus on PCP.

by stealth snail on Jul 1, 2009 3:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I’d be fine with letting Winn go or a less valuable bullpen guy go, or both, I just don’t want to trade anyone significant in the minors.

by quincy0191 on Jul 1, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Free Bowkermania

He’ll blow your mind, brother!

Matt Cain's right hand beats a Royal Flush.

by Viva Gigantes on Jul 1, 2009 4:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

My final offer is this: nothing. Not even a second baseman, which I would appreciate if you would provide personally.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 5:13 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

To Shapiro: “Mark, we’re both a part of the same hypocrisy. But never think that it applies to my top four prospects.”

El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."

by ResDog on Jul 1, 2009 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

None of the fantastic 4 of prospects will be traded for a rental player. If any of those will be traded it will be for someone who is under contract for a few years

by ACgiant97 on Jul 1, 2009 8:06 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm afraid they will be

I get the feeling that Sabean is going to realize in mid-July “Holy crap, we’re leading the wild card! If we get a bat, we could win this!” and then start looking for a BIG player. Then he’ll trade Alderson for Uggla and we’ll all scream NOOO YOU IDIOT NOOOOO!!!

I don’t trust the front office to make a smart deal.

by quincy0191 on Jul 1, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they’re leading the wild card in mid-July and they make that trade, I personally will leap for joy.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they’re leading the wild card in mid-July and they make that trade, I personally will leap for joy.

Fix’d

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Jul 1, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True that. Guess what I’m saying is that I’d leap for joy at that trade whether they’re leading the wild card or not.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, i'd do that trade, too.

"Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense."
Only [hella] games left until the end of Zito's [no, make that Rowand's] contract.
Adoptive father of "Poncho" Villalona: This Angel don't fly. Nothing about him is light.

by thehavenot on Jul 1, 2009 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm perfectly fine with standing pat

- Need to give Bowker a shot. Guys with .450+ OBP arent flukes. The guy has figured it out.

Cain is Able ...

by Norcalfan10 on Jul 1, 2009 8:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The guy has figured it out.

That thought excites me. Get him up already!

"The BB's are out. The BB's are being arseholes to me." - Brian Wilson.

by hairball on Jul 1, 2009 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right his OBP couldn’t possibly be inflated by the fact that he’s hitting over .350….

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has a .100 ISO though. He’d have a pretty decent OBP even if he was hitting like .270.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on Jul 1, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So your point is that he’s a good hitter?

by quincy0191 on Jul 1, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His stats are being boosted by his success?

Perish the thought.

These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx

by RDreamer on Jul 1, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s the PCL. You pretty much suck if you can’t hit .300 there.

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look at his MLEs tho

Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl

by Viliphied on Jul 1, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve seen them and I’m for us bringing up Bowker to play in LF, but at the same time I’m not going to hold my breath and expect that he’s a legit hitter now. I’ll cream myself when I actually see him do this in the majors.

Minor League stats are nice and all but they’re kinda meaningless once a guy is in the majors. Just look at Ben Zobrist, he NEVER showed this kind of ability in the minors. Or Jason Bartlett.

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zobrist has an 888 minor league OPS, which is better than what he’s doing with TB this year.

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on Jul 1, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you on crack? Zobrist’s OPS is over 1.000….

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My bad, I was looking here:

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/Z/Ben-Zobrist.shtml

…which doesn’t seem to be updating.

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on Jul 1, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

unzing

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All I know is LOL @ the Astros for trading him.

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trading for Wigginton*

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just an FYI, and you may want to look into this as it could affect some things in your life:

It’s 2009.

by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Jul 1, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

>:(

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on Jul 1, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As someone suggested the other day, how about trading for Victor Martinez? This, of course, assumes that the Indians could be persuaded to do so.

What would we assume Cleveland would want? I’d guess pitching primarily – they have Garko to play 1st and Shoppach to play C. I’d attempt to interest them in Howry, Medders, Sosa, Valdez, Pucetas – and pretty much most any pitcher below AAA (not Tim2 or MadBum). If adding Randy Winn or Bengie Molina made them happier, so much the better.

My best offer? Sosa, Pucetas, Valdez, & Craig Clark for Martinez. I’d add Winn or Molina if necessary for their purposes, with appropriate $ as needed.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on Jul 1, 2009 8:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

And if they really wanted Villalona, I’d consider Sosa, Valdez, and Villalona for Martinez.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on Jul 1, 2009 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not enough, maybe even if you throw in Alderson.

by Grant on Jul 1, 2009 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you have Pucetas and Craig Clark as high as Villalona?

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry.

:-(

by Cookyman on Jul 1, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, not as high. Just trying to imagine what I’d be willing to give up. I definitely have Clark in my top 15, though.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on Jul 2, 2009 6:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To me Villalona is just as important to the minor league system as MadBum because of his power. MadBum has more talent, but we dont have a surplus of power in the majors or in the minors. We do have a lot of good pitching though. There for Im ok with Alderson but not MadBum or Villalona.

by shaolinironlion on Jul 1, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that having power hitters in the system is crucial, and has been a huge weakness over the past several years. But now that we have Neal, Kieschnick, RaRod, Dominguez, and (hopefully) Joseph in the minors, I could see my way clear to trade AnVil in the right deal.

As for Alderson, if some of our HighA pitchers were 2 years further along their development track, and still doing as well, I’d be more inclined to trade Tim2 – but not under these circumstances. We don’t currently know who our 5th starter is/will be. Johnson isn’t signed after this year. And Zito is, well, Zito. I’m pretty well counting on Tim2 and MadBum to step into our rotation in the semi-near future.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on Jul 2, 2009 6:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hear! Hear!!
I’m pretty well counting on Tim2 and MadBum to step into our rotation in the semi-near future.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 2, 2009 6:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree in general...

If this team really can somehow win the wild card as is, why do anything at all?

Like most I think it’s fairly harmless to move a bullpen guy (Howry now, maybe Merkin if he holds up) and/or an OF for spare parts that are better than current mediocrities (like 2B).

Trading kids that might turn into good players is, this year at least, a little scary. Even if, for example, Kieschnick or Neal is just an average major leaguer someday, that average big leaguer might fill a hole in a lineup that features Posey, Pablo, and the best rotation baseball’s seen in a long, long time. I’d rather wait for that than scramble around to unload some guy the Giants traded away prospects to get this year.

Giants pitching coach Dave Righetti. "I treat Timmy differently from most pitchers: I leave him alone."

There's 3 ways to do something: the right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power/ Ginats Way...

by natteringnabob on Jul 1, 2009 8:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade Randy Winn

John Bowker is a gamer

Oakland Raiders Fan
Golden State Warriors Fan
San Francisco Giants Fan
San Jose Sharks Fan
MMA Fan
USC Trojan Fan

by i love sports101 on Jul 1, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Randy Winn is about to get hot, and we cant get anything for him anyway.

by shaolinironlion on Jul 1, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What we get for him...

Is an open outfield spot for John Bowker.

Now I know Sabes doesn’t think this way, but I wish he did.

by AmorVincitOmnia on Jul 1, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And knowledge of just how badly this team does (or does not) need to enter the Holiday sweepstakes this off season. Even in this economic climate I would be shocked if Holliday does not get north of Rowand contract. So that makes this 2nd piece of knowledge more valuable than Winn’s entire $23.25MM contract that is ending.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 2, 2009 7:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They're playing with house money this year

Except…except….

The notion of going into a playoff series with a starting rotation of Lincecum, Cain and The Big Unit is pretty amazing. You don’t think the other team would be crapping its collective pants over having to face those pitchers in the October twilight shadows? And who knows if this is Johnson’s last hurrah? In 2010 or 2011 your playoff rotation is Lincecum/Cain/very young third starter who isn’t ready for big game pressure. There are a lot of other variables, of course, but you might never have a chance like this.

Mitigating factor: Rich Aurilia pinch-hitting in the 9th inning of a Game 7, down 2-0.

"He is Tim Lincecum...the Most Interesting Pitcher in the World."

by Kitspool on Jul 1, 2009 9:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Shawn Dunston is that you?

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m envisioning Burriss at DH and Aurilia at SS.

by Natto on Jul 1, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bring back Shinjo!

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on Jul 2, 2009 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The "weren't supposed to contend" and "house money" memes are tempting but fallacious.

Folks, opportunities for the postseason don’t come around often and future trips to the dance cannot be taken for granted. No, don’t trade the big 4-6 (depending on whom you would include; I will stipulate to your list of protected guys), yada yada yada. But to say that “we weren’t expecting to contend this year, so therefore let’s not do anything but continue building internally, and then some future year we will go the postseason the ‘right way’ or whatever” ignores that (a) circumstances change, and they have changed this year, and people must adjust to changed circumstances; and (b) the future looks great for us but is not guaranteed.

Make smart trades or call up whomever, but DO IT SOON so there is time to bank a couple of extra wins. Waiting until the very end of July, and I might agree that it’s no longer worth it just because there won’t be enough time to realize the extra wins.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 9:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Completely, with this. Look, we’re all banking on a World Series in 2011, but the very same forces that allowed us to be surprising contenders this season might make us surprising disappointments in 2011. Or, in other words: Arizona Diamondbacks.

Go for the flag when you can. Don’t do anything stupid, don’t overpay, but go for the flag when you can.

Saving countless runs with my Brian Horwitz

by lyricalkiller on Jul 1, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are right.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we are a lock on 2011 WS but caution is the order of the day right now.

If a team has a strong Top of the Rotation ( check) and either good defense or good hitting they will be in the wild card come July 1 year after year until age and/or injuries take them out of it. That is the "new" reality.

Plus the stronger the pitching staffs usssaly don’t starting realizing the bulk of wins over competitors tell after the All Star break anyways when other squads our using pitchers that are either cannon fodder or not yet up to making 1-3 spots in a rotation more often or good young but inexperienced arms wear down.

Our system is no longer bankrupt with a thin crust of talent on the big club but we don’t yet have a lot of surplus either. Realistically I think the best odds we have is league average 2nd baseman from some were using a non elite farm arm of two. The rest just unravels what we might need just to stay competive the rest of this season.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree re 2b, but the clock is ticking on whether that will have the impact to put us in postseason.

The longer we delay, the less chance that will make a difference. Past a certain point, it doesn’t matter anymore. I don’t pretend to know when that point is exactly, but getting 3 months of that guy instead of 2 months seems like maybe the difference.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That I agree with.

I mean Uribe will stay hot for maybe 1-3 more weeks then were are back to a lot of pain. An aweful lot of pain.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d say trade smart, but don’t make a trade just for the sake of making a trade. If a team is looking to rip off the Giants, or if the trade target is such a marginal improvement that it’s not worth it, then just don’t bother. In other words, don’t trade for a Shea Hillenbrand type to “solidify 1st base.”

I'm thinking but nothing's happening.

by JRPhillips on Jul 1, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that’s what I’m worried about — Sabean decides to go cheap, trading for a couple of veteran scrubs instead of getting a player who can really make a difference.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is no empirical evidence that Sabean is that…..Wait a minute…..

Nevermind

My adopted son Matt Downs . Ranked as the 24th best prospect in the Giants farm system by Baseball America !!

by nvsfg on Jul 1, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+eleventy million

Baseball is a crazy game. Teams are often “supposed” to make the postseason for a number of reasons (talent, salary, yankeeness) but for whatever reason they don’t put it together. Who knows what will happen by 2011? Injuries happen, guys underachieve, etc. We need to take advantage of the opportunity while its in front of us

by m34josh on Jul 1, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The flip side of that is the closer you get to the end of July, the better your chances of making a smart trade. There are more sellers and they have less opportunity to wait for better offers. There’s only maybe 5-7 teams out of it right now.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on Jul 1, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That probably won’t change much by the end of July. This has been the case the past couple of years, very few teams being out of it by the deadline. One of many reasons why the trade deadline has in essence become almost a non factor now. Not much gets done because too many teams think they are still in it.

by Hobbes2d on Jul 1, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Call up Bowker, trade Winn is fine. But if you think we’re going to get a player of consequence for anything less than Villanola (considering who is leading this ship) you’re deluding yourself or some other GM is much stupider than I thought.

by quincy0191 on Jul 1, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still want to trade for a decent but not great second baseman (or even… DAN UGGLA!) but I really don’t mind standing pat if the alternative is trading one of the Big Four.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on Jul 1, 2009 9:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A vote for “Mornow” sounds like a vote for “less future”

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Jul 1, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very well done!

Proud father of Barry Bonds.

by Sabertooth on Jul 1, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I voted trade no one, but if there had been an option “an outfielder” or “a veteran outfielder” that would have gotten a vote. Mostly so Bowker and Nate and Lewis get all the starts in right and left, maybe some in center too.
who in center? Why not the best arm, that’s probly Scheirholz. Center gets lots of chances on sac flies, singles up the middle, hits to the gap, should have a good arm there plus adequate speed.

cheering for Adam Witter, who will hit bigleague dingers some day.
Still yelling "Go, Antoan"

by foothillsfan on Jul 1, 2009 10:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

should have a good arm there plus adequate speed

You’ve got that reversed. CF (all outfielders, really) should have good speed plus an adequate arm.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Schierholtz would be a really bad CF.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on Jul 1, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All the mediocre outfielders in the system cant put us over the top, this is a move to make when we fall out of the race later on in the season.

by shaolinironlion on Jul 1, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You do realize our most productive LF is basically benched ( Lewis)? Xanthan puts some data up below the gives the sOPS per position and then a bit later breaks down the production for LF. 2 major points that come out are:

1. Needless to say the production bar is not very high to improve in a non Lewis LF.
2. Second base is really, really, really bad.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just noticed this:

if you get league-average production (which we do from at least 6/8 of the lineup)

Well, no. In fact, we’re nowhere near “league average” at no fewer than five positions — everything but CF, RF, and 3B.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 10:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I am just curious are you useing a combined metric or just offense based?

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OPS

If you counted defense, things wouldn’t get much better — maybe a little at first base and left field.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yay for sOPS+!

Giants totals by position:

C – 92
1B – 80
2B – 55 (lol)
3B – 126
SS – 80
LF – 72
CF – 126
RF – 98

RF is better than it looks because of Winn’s defense. 2B is laughably bad.

by xanthan on Jul 1, 2009 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s okay, Matt “623 OPS” Downs will save the day.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Giants should throw more stuff at the wall and hope it sticks. I thought it was kinda funny that Molina wasn’t a league average hitting catcher.

by xanthan on Jul 1, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Catcher is better than I thought, actually. I thought a .270 OBP would lead to something worse than 92.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point. I try to block out Molina’s OBP from my mind.

by xanthan on Jul 1, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man 2nd a 150 proof shot of pain. Omph!

Being a Bowkerrmanic i think that 72 LF looks mighty promising.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Second base is very Uggla (freudian slip!).

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on Jul 1, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was notorious cross dresser.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

who looked good wearing nothing but a fruedian slip

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Jul 1, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK I AM NOW STRONGLY IN FAVOR OF TRADING FOR A SECOND BASEMAN

Watch out San... oh, wait, Sadowski... uncle Pucetas is comin' for you.

by Sammy Danger on Jul 1, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol 2B

Still in despair.
BRING BACK MARMOL!
konakona:「つかさに教われと...なんか非常に負けたような気がする。」
Shun Kakazu: MOAR JAPANESE PROSPECTS PLZ

by Zetsuboushita on Jul 1, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am quite surprised

that relatively speaking Lewis has been worse than Ishikawa.

I don’t think we can really do anything about SS… We really do have an extra OF. Between Lewis/Schierholtz/Torres/Bowker we really have no use for all 4, or maybe even 3 if we are happy with Winn as primary CF backup.

Don’t the Braves have a horrible OF? /checks bb-ref. TRUE. What about one of the above for Omar Infante? Is his defense enough to play 2B? I suppose they are not going to give up Martin Prado…

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Jul 1, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, it’s Lewis + Winn (who has been pretty cold since starting to play more LF) + Torres + I think Velez might have played a game or two there…

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on Jul 1, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather not think about Velez’s adventures in LF ever again.

by Natto on Jul 1, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather not think about Velez s adventures in LF ever again.

Fixed

My adopted son Matt Downs . Ranked as the 24th best prospect in the Giants farm system by Baseball America !!

by nvsfg on Jul 1, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it’s total LF production.

Lewis , 214 PA, .255/.346/.388
Winn, 71 PA, .206/.214/.265
Torres, 37 PA, .194/.306/.355
Velez, 4 PA, .000/.250/.000

Lewis alone has a sOPS+ in LF of 90. So he’s been OK. The other 112 PA’s that the Giants have ran out in LF haven’t helped.

by xanthan on Jul 1, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s also total 1B production, which included Aurilia’s horrible horrible Rich Aurilianess.

A week or two of Sandoval is there, but the non-Ishi stuff is mostly Aurilia rocking a .435 OPS.

GROUGTHINK ALERT

by groug on Jul 1, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually Pablo has 68 PAs as a first baseman and Aurilia has 64. So the 1B production is seriously boosted by his awesomeness. Ishikawa’s sOPS+ at first is 72.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on Jul 1, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

it seems my surprise was warrented.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Jul 1, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I barely remembered any 1B from Sandoval. Oh well.

Aurilia’s OPS+ there is 4, BTW.

GROUGTHINK ALERT

by groug on Jul 1, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sOPS+

GROUGTHINK ALERT

by groug on Jul 1, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It only seems like it’s 4.

by Natto on Jul 1, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sandoval played a good bit of 1B when his elbow was hurt

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Jul 1, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ergo Lewis must sit and the rest play in left field?

Bork!
Bork! Bork!!

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bowk! Bowk! Bowk!

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Jul 1, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

on the one hand...

I am torn. The baseball pragamatist in me knows that a trade is coming and, offensively, needed. We still need that bat and there are at least 3 positions we could use one in: corner OF, 2nd or 1st base. The question is, as always: will it be a good or bad trade? Will the trade kill our future for a Hillendbrandt like scrub trade, or a shrewd movement of middle of the pack prospects for a productive-but-not-star bat. Combine our good fortune health wise, our relative lack of productive depth, and a team comprised of young players who have to survive a stretch run, a trade is neccessary to get to the post season.

then on the other hand…
There is the baseball romantic in me. This is often a stronger force. When it comes to baseball, I have no problem admitting, I tend to lead with my heart. The thought that we could make the post team with THIS team is thrilling. Shit, despite how poor we were last year, I actually enjoyed watching the Giants more than I had the last few years of the Bonds era. With them exceeding expectations this year, I am extremely happy to watch this team try, and fail if neccessary, to make a post-season run. If we cant make it we enter 2010 with a solid young core and the opportunity to sign a FA or two to fill vacancies created by the end of current contracts.

At the end of the day, I think I am enjoying a this uncertainty more than I would if it were a lock.

by uber on Jul 1, 2009 11:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

on the one hand…
I am torn.

Somebody get my first aid kit!

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Jul 1, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would argue that the idea that all our prospects are above-average and that the 2011 team is an inevitable monster is equally romantic.

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Barring something extremely bright and shiny become available at 1st or Corner OF I would just as soon ride with what we got there ( Ishi & Bowker in 2009 baby!! The season of returned hope!!). In August maybe make a wavier claim on a guy that fits. Frankly 2nd base is the place to look for helping a run this season and a Mark Class would be huge upgrade there.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Justin Miller: More ink'd than an octopus on PCP.

by stealth snail on Jul 1, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And another factor: what is in Sabean's own best interest in his contract's last year-- win now or build a behemoth for someone else to have?

I’m not saying. I’m just saying.

I think this stuff works at the subconscious level; I don’t mean to suggest that he would deliberately make a short-sighted move in order to bolster his chances of getting rehired. But it could be that if he pulls off a move that puts us in the postseason, he might be helping the company and helping himself.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Spoken like a fan that watched the last couple years of Rosen & Craig and the after math.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still can't talk about it. (sniff)

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

/ nods

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ARRRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
I’m not saying. I’m just saying.

by Lars The Wanderer on Jul 1, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What? That phrase is getting on your nerves?

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It doesn’t mean anything.

by Lars The Wanderer on Jul 1, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

would you prefer " hear me now, listen to me later."?

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 1, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree, but can see how it might be getting overused.

I have always interpreted it as “I am not truly asserting [x] in its fullest sense, but am saying that there might be SOMEthing to the idea of [the category of x].” So, in my example, I’m not saying Sabean WILL make a short-term decision for his own advantage at the expense of the team, but that there is something to the idea that the last year of his contract might play a subconscious role in his decisions as the season unfolds."

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I always interpreted it as kind of a cop-out (not to point any finger at you since you obviously have a different view of the saying). In my view, people use it as a way of not taking any responsibility of what they are talking about. As in, they’re not thinking about what they are saying, they aren’t giving it much thought, they’re just saying it. Example: “You know, your mom is looking HOT today. What? I’m just saying!” He was just saying it. There were no thoughts of wanting to have the mom & Jessica Alba in a three way. When I hear “I’m just saying” it’s usually as some type of infallible excuse over something that was just said. Or as a precursor of something that might not go over well with who it’s being said to. That’s all I’m saying.

El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."

by ResDog on Jul 1, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe just “i’m just saying” by itself, but when you throw the “i’m not saying” in front of it, I agree with the Mayor.

Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl

by Viliphied on Jul 1, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I agree that "I'm just saying" is a total cop-out, seeking to excuse the very thing the person just said without retracting or amending it.

But the other thing is a different saying, at least as I see it.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm...

I actually haven’t heard this phrase too often. When I heard “I’m not saying”, I interpreted it at face value & ignored it because you obviously were saying it when you continued with your comment. It is a bit too open. I take it’s supposed to mean “I’m not saying I believe/have put thought into/agree with this.” Something like that?

El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."

by ResDog on Jul 1, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not quite

It’s as I said above: “I’m not saying [x] in its fullest possible sense, but I AM saying that there might be something here.”

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on Jul 1, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve always understood it the way the Mayor explained it. As such, I find the phrase actually a useful shorthand, and in no way a copout.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on Jul 2, 2009 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not say saying. “I’m just say heying.”

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Jul 1, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As long as you’re not “say say say”ing.

Still backing Notgardo, wheresoever he may wander. (Don't forget to wriiiite!)

by tk on Jul 2, 2009 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, he’s just saying.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on Jul 1, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, none of these guys are hitters who will make the opposing pitcher crap himself

Thinking about facing Pablo just made me crap myself. Then again I’m just an IT guy who uses a crappy Giants pitchers name as my signon to this site so nevermind.

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

by WilliamVanLandingham on Jul 1, 2009 1:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Trading Matt Cain

I am not advocating for a trade right now, but if you want to get something, you have to give something up. If the Giants are really going to go for it this year, then I think they need to get two All-Star quality players (one of which is a 2nd baseman), or one superstar (who would likely be 2nd baseman). Unfortunately, there is one superstar 2nd baseman in baseball – Chase Utley, with Kinsler, Pedroia, and Zobrist (maybe) being somewhat close to Utley’s caliber.

Matt Cain is a great pitcher. We all know that. We know he has been a victim of atrocious run-support. This year, he is putting up basically the same “real” numbers that he has in the past. His K and BB-rates are similar and his velocity is down a bit. What has changed this season up to this point is he is stranding more runners and his BABIP-against is very low – both of which are outside his norm. This is contributing to an artificially deflated ERA. Combined with normal run support, his wins are up, and he has a very good W-L ratio. So the two stats that people IN baseball (read: those not in their mother’s basement) pay attention to are stellar: wins and ERA.

So the question is: will Matt Cain get any better? He is only 24, but has been in the league since 2005, with 2006 being his first full season. Since 2006, he has basically been the same pitcher; yes a great one, but this year his “standard” stats are definitely better than his actual pitching has been. So, after 3+ years, is he suddenly going to take off and achieve a higher level, or has he sort of maxed out? I don’t know how to project this, but if he has plateaued, now would seem the time to unload him. Since the Giants appear to have some great arms coming up, they could take a risk that said arms will fill in the gap left by Cain over the next few years.

Of course trading Cain would diminish the Giants chances this year, as bringing up the young pitchers now is probably not a good idea. So any trade of him this year would be for 2010 or 2011.

Of course if the Giants were just able to get average production out of C, 1B, 2B, SS, and one of the two corner OF, they could win the World Series. Getting average production may not require trading Cain, but might require trading one of the young arms.

Just some thoughts…

by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Jul 1, 2009 1:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What has changed this season up to this point is he is stranding more runners and his BABIP-against is very low – both of which are outside his norm.

His BABIP this season is .269… his career BABIP is .275.

And no. This might happen in the offseason but it just is not going to happen right now, with the Giants leading the Wild Card and playing very well of late. It’s not worth talking about until October at least.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on Jul 1, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm… I see a BABIP of .280 including this season’s .266. Neither here nor there…

I would like to reiterate that I am not advocating trading Cain, but simply was looking at somebody who I thought might be overvalued in the eyes of other GMs and thus would be a candidate to sell high in a position that the Giants are sort of dealing from strength.

And I agree with you. I think Sabean smells blood, and for better or worse this team is standing pat, or there will be a trade to help them win now.

by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Jul 1, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was looking at baseball-reference.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on Jul 1, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting, Fangraphs has it at .280. I suppose you are right though, .266 isn’t way out of his norm, and he may be one of the pitchers who has a certain amount of control over BABIP to keep it under .300.

by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Jul 1, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd trade him for... say...

Pujols. Or Longoria. Or David Wright or Moreanu or Utley, or Hanley Ramierez or maybe even Adrian Gonzales or some other perennial MVP candidate signed for 3-4 years (not sure about contract status of any of those guys… it’s not like anyone would make that deal). They are not in any particular order either.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Jul 1, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Morneau seems out of place on that list.

Mauer, on the other hand…

by Evan on Jul 1, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NO

Now I’ll read the rest of the comment.

El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."

by ResDog on Jul 1, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really think Cain will get better. I think the biggest hurdle will be keeping Big Head from piling on 1330, 140, 150 outings like weight on a mule. Not only to reduce a chance of arm injury but to keep encouraging efficiency. Let the kid get to 27-28 then go all old style baseball pitcher on him if you must.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 2, 2009 7:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can we trade Matt Cain, please?

He showed today that he can’t even do the little things to win games, such as get the bat on the ball during that failed hit-and-run with Ishikawa. What a choker.

Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all

If Dustin Pedroia played in Seattle, not many people would be talking about him.

GET THAT VORP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!

by baetown415 on Jul 1, 2009 11:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ugh, a hit and run with the goddamn PITCHER batting. Can we just fire Bochy now please?

Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl

by Viliphied on Jul 2, 2009 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of all the small ball "plays" why the HHIIEEAADD insists on the most likely one to create double plays as often as he does mystifies me.

Yes, This is still a 79 win squad.
Fuggen Rox! You might want to try beating The Bums more than once in 10 games. Try it. You might find you like it.

by daveinexile on Jul 2, 2009 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So I’m really glad these 100+ comments were about … baseball. And trades. And the Giants.

Because I don’t watch the Simpsons!

Still backing Notgardo, wheresoever he may wander. (Don't forget to wriiiite!)

by tk on Jul 2, 2009 10:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Timgoodavatar_small
Tim's misdemeanor charges have been dropped
Daisy_small
Human after all (Timmy)
Lincecum_small
Lukewarm Stove: Trades, Transactions, and Troster Trideas.
Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards: Outstanding Newcomer
Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards IV

Recent FanPosts

Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards: Best Fanpost
Hatoyama-southpark_small
Which Old, Declining outfielder would you like?
Small
Who Should The Giants Acquire to Play OF In 2010?
Small
Time for a Semi-Rebuild?
Small
A REAL realistic view of Giants 2010
Olds1_small
Who will be behind the dish?
Small
Kevin Kouzmanoff: Cheap Power Upgrade
Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards: Best Non-gameday Image

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S