Is Scott Boras Evil?
Kevin Goldstein doesn't seem to think so.
5 months ago
cheno
6 comments
0 recs |
Comments
The owners are evil, Boras fights them, ergo Boras is good.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Jun 8, 2009 11:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
slight change:
The owners are evil, and Bud Selig used to be an owner. Boras fights Bud Selig, therefore Boras is good.
I don’t know if I buy my own logic tho…
"Well, um, actually a pretty nice little Saturday, we're going to go to Home Depot. Yeah, buy some wallpaper, maybe get some flooring, stuff like that. Maybe Bed, Bath, & Beyond, I don't know, I don't know if we'll have enough time."
by Azantor on Jun 12, 2009 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol no
Still in despair.
BRING BACK MARMOL!
konakona:「つかさに教われと...なんか非常に負けたような気がする。」
Shun Kakazu: MOAR JAPANESE PROSPECTS PLZ
by Zetsuboushita on Jun 8, 2009 11:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh, he does a lot of good things and a lot of bad things. The owners try everything they can to screw the players out of money, and Boras tries everything he can to get that money to the players. He’s the best in the business at what he does – getting his players the most money possible, so I have no problem with that. Can’t blame him for his negotiating tactics, after all, GM’s/owners don’t have to give him what he demands.
That said, he also pulls some shady moves that I don’t always think are in the best interests of his client. I could definitely see him advising Strasburg to reject the Nationals offer (like the Landon Powell example from the article), and there is no situation where that’s the right move for Strasburg. Rather, it’s the right move for Boras – if it works he gets all the credit and future business out of it, and if it doesn’t…easy enough to blame on the unfair system.
He also does things like shutting his clients completely off from the team, which to some degree is understandable, but in the fashion he does is completely over the top and let’s him control every aspect of the negotiation. Again, it puts him in a situation where he can make decisions for Scott Boras, not his client.
If I were lucky/talented enough to have the privelage of playing major league baseball, when it comes down to it, I’d absolutely hire Boras as my agent. I just wouldn’t let him steer me in a direction that benefitted him rather than myself.
by Missing Barry on Jun 9, 2009 6:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
evil? no, unethical? yes
he sometimes put his own interest above that of his client, and/or puts the interest of one client over that of another. I refer specifically to the Pedro Alvarez fiasco, in which he put the interests of Alvarez over that of another Boras client, Eric Hosmer. Hosmer, who had already signed a big bonus with KC, ended up being pulled from the field until the Alvarez mess was cleared up. That obviously did not benefit Hosmer.
He also was determined to get the biggest bonus in the draft for Alvarez, even though Buster Posey had already received it (different agent) and put his client’s entire contract at risk to do so. The point was to promote himself as the guy who can get the biggest bonus in the draft, not to benefit his client.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Jun 9, 2009 8:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No. He is the George Steinbrenner of agents. Somewhat shady, but willing to make sure the big bucks go to the right people.
Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...
by rotorueter on Jun 9, 2009 10:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs


















