McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Move Buster Posey to second base

  It's a slow rainy day here in NY and I'm bored and have nothing to do, so I'm figuring why not make a fanpost, so my friends in SF can read it and be bored too? Anyway, I was thinking about being a contender next year, and the idea for me was to convert Buster Posey to the position where we need him the most right now, and that would be second base.

    Why would I do this? Let's look at the plan right now. The plan is for Bengie Molina to play out the last year of his deal and then the Buster Posey era would begin. What is the problem with this? Bengie Molina is arguably the best hitter in our lineup, definitely the best RBI man,  and a good defensive catcher, so why would we be shoving him out the door?  He drove in about 95 runs last year, and seems on his way to having a similar type year, so why not give him a one or two year extension, and move Buster to second? Think about it, where's the upgrade if Buster replaces Bengie? He'll eventually be a better player, (probably a much better player) but how long will this take?  Even if Buster DOES put up better numbers than Bengie in his rookie season, how much better can they be? How many more games would the Giants win?

     Now let's look at second base. Manny Burriss is going to probably hit about .200 with 0 homeruns. Imagine the improvement  if Buster takes his place and hits about .280 with 15 homers and 80 rbi.  That's a huge improvement for one position, and if the Giants can make this kind of improvement at another position or two, (like outfield and first base) with our pitching it might even make us the best team in the division.

     Now I know that long term, Buster will be far more valuable to the Giants as a catcher, so I would only do this until Bengie starts to show he is done, but for the 2010 season and perhaps the following year, I think the best move for this team would be to move Buster to second and give Bengie a short extension.

    

    

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs  |  Comment 270 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Bengie Molina is arguably the best hitter in our lineup, definitely the best RBI man, and a good defensive catcher, so why would we be shoving him out the door?

Because he’s old and more likely to stop being good than remaining good.

by xanthan on May 3, 2009 9:08 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of Molina, I thought this was funny.

Hitters ranked by PA’s with no walks this season:

I wonder who will walk first? Molina or Betancourt?

by xanthan on May 3, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Molina will probably get intentional walked before he takes an actual walk

Not so proud adoptive parent of the set-up man.
This is definitely not Howry do it!

by CB30 on May 3, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa

I thought Bengie had at least one IBB.

by Natto on May 3, 2009 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

which is why I said give him a one or two year extension tops. Are you sure he’s done after this season?

Proud new dad of Edgardo errr Edgar Renteria!!!

by rxmeister on May 3, 2009 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I admit that the Molina signing has turned out way better than I ever expected, but he’ll be 35-years-old after this season. I just don’t think I would want to extend a 35-year-old catcher with weight problems. Catchers generally don’t play into their mid-to-late 30’s and they generally fall off the production cliff pretty fast.

If Posey isn’t read for 2010, I’d rather let Sandoval catch for the season since he’s basically a younger Molina anyways.

by xanthan on May 3, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Bengie is still looking good now but when catchers fall off the cliff, it happens hard and fast. I wouldn’t tempt fate.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 3, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Plus he will probably be a Type A or B free agent, but wouldnt be in a couple more years

Not so proud adoptive parent of the set-up man.
This is definitely not Howry do it!

by CB30 on May 3, 2009 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

given the actions of teams around baseball this offseason, however, this may not matter. It the Giants’ offered Benji arb (hoping for the draft pick), I think there is every chance he would accept. Draft picks are valued more now than ever, and I don’t know if any team would value Benji highly enough to give up a pick.

by tyrannoman on May 4, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ding Ding DIng

A team most likely would sign a player like BMoney AFTER the date that requires arbitration.

by wilriv21 on May 4, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As Bill Walsh would say

It’s better to get rid of a guy 1 year early than 1 year too late

by superk1ng on May 3, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fun Fact

so did Branch Rickey

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, so long as you can replace the guy. And between Posey and Sandoval, the Giants can absolutely replace Bengie.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on May 3, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Reverse Biggio Effect.

Start him out at second base, after a few years move him to centerfield, and then move him to catcher. Sounds like a plan. Not to mention that he can play all 9 positions, and has a plus 90.s fastball. Can we just clone the guy and let him play all 9 positions.

by bradleybear on May 3, 2009 9:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought I deleted the part about moving him to centerfield after a few years. Thank God I got out the part of having him coach both first and third! Seriously though, you’re wildly exaggerating my point. Playing him at second base for a year or two before moving him back to catcher is hardly moving him all over the diamond.

Proud new dad of Edgardo errr Edgar Renteria!!!

by rxmeister on May 3, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gerald Posey

His athleticism and bat could possibly move him to another position. Between Bengie Molina, Pablo Sandoval and Jackson Williams the Giants would have the position of catcher covered for years.

The versatility of Gerald Posey could be a huge benefit to the organization.

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 10:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

HOORAY JACKSON WILLIAMS

The fact that his minor league slugging percentage is worse than Emmanuel Burriss’s certainly fills me with hope.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI

There is a Jackson Williams broken bat for sale in the dugout store

Baseball is a lot like life. The line drives are caught, the squibbles go for base hits. It's an unfair game. -Rod Kanehl. Adopted brother of Jason Jarvis

by j14 on May 3, 2009 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What, did he break it over his leg?

Barry Zito: Mike Hampton with a guitar

by JakeS on May 5, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know insane. This is not it.

I would have to think about it more before I would say it’s a great idea, but I do think we have to start making our move for the titles starting next year, and 2nd base is a real problem. Eugenio (7 letters:5 syllables is the only impressive ratio he will ever post in his life) is clearly not the answer, unless it’s a really really really bizarre question. I don’t happen to believe Frandsen is the answer, either. So I guess I’m on board with the DrugSlinger— pending getting a miracle young 2baseman in the next 8 months.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.

by Mayor of 311 on May 3, 2009 10:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

BARRY ZITO FOR DAN UGGLA!!!!

Joe Martinez: My fingers are crossed and my palms are together for you.
When it's all said and done, America will be remembered for three things: The Bill of Rights, jazz, and baseball.

by cornball on May 3, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only if they pay part of Ugglas contract.

Proud father of Dallas Mcpherson, the Babe Ruth of AAA.

by The Thrill on May 3, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My only question

Would really have to be his defense. I know next to nothing about his abilities as an infielder except that he’s an athletic dude and he played there a lot in college. That doesn’t mean he’s good at it, though, and that could be the real kicker.

“Athletic enough to play second” doesn’t do it for me. “Played some in college” doesn’t do it for me. I’ve never heard an actual scouting report on what he can actually do there. But the idea that he can play multiple positions is obviously an attractive one.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on May 3, 2009 10:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Damn you howtheyscored, I look up while typing to watch heat atlanta game 7 and you bogart my point

The absentee father of Edwin "Cue Ball" Quirarte, now that he is doin well in the minors, its time to get back in his life, and in his checking account!

by TexasRanger on May 3, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is basically how I feel on the issue. I’m not going to champion it and I’m not going to dismiss it. There’s simply not enough available information. However, the front-office should keep the possibility in mind, especially if Bengie is brought back (doesn’t make much sense to me) and they can’t find an offensively adequate 2B. This whole problem is really magnified by the team’s lack of good power hitters at any of the corner spots, so improving the depth of the line-up should be paramount going forward.

Joe Martinez: My fingers are crossed and my palms are together for you.
When it's all said and done, America will be remembered for three things: The Bill of Rights, jazz, and baseball.

by cornball on May 3, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would think 2B would be a waste of his arm.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 5:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly this, his arm is freakin’ awesome!

Wisconsin: Famous for dairy, Ryan Rohlinger and not much else.

by Scottsdale on May 4, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, No, No, NO

What makes you think that Posey would be an adequate defender at 2nd base? Don’t fall into the trap that he played all nine positions in a game against a terrible, no name school. That was just a poor sportmanship stunt by his coach. We all say Posey is athletic but does that equal middle infielder skills? I don’t think so, being a shortsop in college, and not being considered a major league caliber defender there does not automatically equal major league ready second basemen. Also do not bring up Sandoval as he has been a third basemen in the organization about the same amount of time as he has been a catcher, although maybe a little less. Bottom line, don’t mess with the kids development!

The absentee father of Edwin "Cue Ball" Quirarte, now that he is doin well in the minors, its time to get back in his life, and in his checking account!

by TexasRanger on May 3, 2009 10:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

he was a shortstop in college who became a catcher because his college team had a need at that position. If he was taken off of short because he was poor defensively that would be one thing, but that simply wasn’t the case. If he’s a capable shortstop, he would probably be at least a capable second baseman.

Proud new dad of Edgardo errr Edgar Renteria!!!

by rxmeister on May 3, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he was capable in college which doesn’t always translate to the pro game, and besides I’m willing to bet that his body has changed since becoming a catcher, he would have to put on lower body weight to be able to squat for nine innings, which would obviously decrease his range.

The absentee father of Edwin "Cue Ball" Quirarte, now that he is doin well in the minors, its time to get back in his life, and in his checking account!

by TexasRanger on May 3, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

To me, if he were going to be a second baseman his body would project more like Jeff Kent than Emmanuel Burriss. And isn’t the only reason why Kent played 2nd was because he wasn’t good enough to play anything else? Gerald is pretty thick in his legs and upper body from what I could tell at spring training. He could have value at 3rd base until Benji is ready though. But 2nd base seems more fantasy baseball logic than baseball logic.

by Fresburg on May 3, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

“he was capable in college which doesn’t always translate to the pro game”

And it isn’t worth a try because?

by AmorVincitOmnia on May 3, 2009 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because he is an elite friggin catcher, who can be a plus defender and hitter, where is the downside to that?

The absentee father of Edwin "Cue Ball" Quirarte, now that he is doin well in the minors, its time to get back in his life, and in his checking account!

by TexasRanger on May 4, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has more value as a catcher. Every scout and their mother seems to agree that Pablo is destined for 1B, and that Posey is an above average defensive catcher who will hit. That’s very, very rare. Not to compare the players – because Posey is not projected to be this good – but Mauer is going to lose a LOT of value once they eventually shift him to third or first. Keep Gerald behind the plate.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mauer and Posey

Posey’s also likely to lose that value more quickly if he remains a catcher. Look, Posey appears to be an elite hitter – let’s plan to keep him that way as long as possible. We don’t know when the SF organization will ever again draft a hitter who reaches the bigs with this much potential. We need to treat him like gold.

And I don’t seem Mauer’s value going down when he gets shifted to 1B or LF. Are you assuming he would be taking the place of a superior hitter at one of those positions? I find that unlikely in the extreme.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't seem = don't see

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posey is projected to be an elite hitter for the catching position, not overall. (.280, 15-20 HR is the most frequently cited estimate – hardly league shattering when all players are taken into consideration.) Moving him from the catching position – where he is a plus defender – will diminish his value because yes, he will be (depending on the position) theoretically replacing a better hitter/defender at the other position AND weakening the catching position because his replacement at C will not (again theoretically) be as good. If the Giants need help at 2B, etc. they need to go out and find a 2B, whether that’s internally or externally, but they do not need to hurt their organizational strength at C to make that happen. Having an elite hitter behind the plate is a plus. The Braves, Twins, etc. would be far worse if they had panicked and stuck McCann or Mauer into other positions.

Also, I don’t have the numbers in front of me, but every position has a different replacement level value for offensive stats. Catchers are not equal to LF, etc. Mauer would absolutely be considered a weak-hitting 1B or LF, a negative in the position because he’d be compared to players like Pujols or Braun. True, not every team has a Pujols or Braun, or the ability to go get guys like that, but positions like 1B and LF are power hitting positions and Mauer is not a power hitter. By slotting him into a spot where you are expecting more production hurts a team from going out and getting a guy who can provide that production, regardless of whether the team actually would go get a better player.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why is that so unlikely?

Mauer’s OPS in the last 3 seasons: .936, .808, .834. That ranks him 1st, 4th (although with not quite enough PAs to officially qualify), and 3rd among all ML catchers.

Compared to ML first baseman, he would rank 10th, 22nd, and 14th. There are way more first basemen capable of a .900 or even .800 OPS than there are catchers.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on May 4, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But if those same 1st basemen were required to take on the workload of catching (squatting 9 innings a game, physical abuse, etc.) wouldn’t their numbers be depressed, especially as the year wore on?

Hi, I am Johnny Disaster.

by Johnny Disaster on May 4, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, that's a good question.

Do catchers wear down more than first basemen over the course of the season? I guess conventional wisdom would say yes. I found this BP analysis from a few years ago that suggests that catchers wear down in the second half, but that second basemen wear down even more (!). I’m not really sure what to make of that. Also, DHs wore down more than center fielders (or shortstops). I wonder how significant the numbers in that study actually are.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on May 4, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lamarckian Evolution FTW!

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 5, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still can’t be convinced by the idea that he played there in college. It’s not a scouting report and it doesn’t explain what any of his actual skills or deficiencies might be. All it really means to me is that he’s almost definitely better at playing second base than I am.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on May 3, 2009 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

so

why don’t the Giants try during the beginning of spring training or something, just to see!

Mischievously implosive purple pitching staff.

by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on May 3, 2009 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWIW, Evans was just on KNBR and he was saying that Posey hasn’t been taking groundballs at any other position in the minors. I think it’s pretty clear that the Giants like him as a catcher.

by xanthan on May 3, 2009 10:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

There is no reason to take ground balls at this juncture. He already knows how to take ground balls. Posey needs to devote his attention to catching and all its nuances. If/When the Giants feel they have another need Posey can fill he then can return to being an infielder.

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am going to make a wild prediction here and say that he’s never going to return to being an infielder.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 3, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Going to go out on a limb and say it depends what the organization has as catching alternatives.

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have a third baseman who most people seem to want to be a first baseman. Other than that… ummm… not much?

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on May 3, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Remember

wilriv likes Jackson Williams. A lot.

"Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense."
Only [hella] games left until the end of Zito's contract.
Adoptive father of "Poncho" Villalona: This Angel don't fly. Nothing about him is light.

by thehavenot on May 3, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BA has the #16 prospect in the organization as catcher Jackson Williams and there has been some buzz about a young catcher from Venezuela Hector Sanchez.

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson Williams is horrible and Hector Sanchez is in rookie league.

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry. Because he was awesome once, and, goddammit, he shall be awesome once again!

I hope.

by Cookyman on May 3, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he’s never going to return to being an infielder

She used the qualifier “never” and I believe if SF has an alternative catching solution they use Posey at another position. Based on reports there could be two possiblitites in house and who knows what future possible options lay ahead.

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I meant that he’s so far away, there’s just a lot that could go wrong. I like Sanchez, but the odds of any rookie league prospect making the majors, except for the really elite ones, are pretty slim.

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry. Because he was awesome once, and, goddammit, he shall be awesome once again!

I hope.

by Cookyman on May 3, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So assuming the Giants find they suddenly have a plethora of catchers who are all ready for playing time behind the dish at the same time, and all are qualified to be starters, does it really make sense to convert one or two into other position players? Wouldn’t it be smarter to look to trade some of your depth?

I'm thinking but nothing's happening.

by JRPhillips on May 5, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson Williams will never play in San Francisco.

Ever.

by Lars The Wanderer on May 3, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson Williams will never play for any big league team. He is organizational filler.

by Lars The Wanderer on May 3, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

players with his defense and game calling abilities have made a career out of being backup catchers in MLB. IF he can hit he could be a starter.

by wilriv21 on May 3, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Game calling abilities don’t exist.

by xanthan on May 3, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

IF he can hit he could be a starter.

That’s true for me, too.

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry. Because he was awesome once, and, goddammit, he shall be awesome once again!

I hope.

by Cookyman on May 3, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could see him having a stint or two as someone’s backup catcher. The standards for the job are often quite low – remember Yamid Haad?

But I don’t think he’ll stick or become a good major leaguer.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will be shocked if Jackson Williams doesn’t get at least at least a cup of coffee with the Giants, probably this year.

I’d put money on this, actually.

by Evan on May 3, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why would the Giants have any reason to give Jackson Williams a cup of coffee? He’s not on the 40-man. They have enough catchers. He can’t hit.

No way does this happen.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.

by groug on May 3, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brian Bocock couldn’t hit, nor was he on the 40-man. Same with Ryan Rohlinger. Was Burriss on the 40-man when he got called up? I can’t remember.

They don’t care that he can’t hit. They didn’t care on draft day, they didn’t care when they promoted him to San Jose, and they don’t care now. His numbers thus far actually track well with Mike Matheny’s, and they liked Matheny enough to give him millions of dollars.

It may not be this year, but eventually he’ll get the call.

by Evan on May 3, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless of course Sabean is let go.

by Evan on May 3, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bocock and Rohlinger were completely different situations because the team was desperate for a shortstop and third baseman. This team will not be desperate for a catcher anytime soon, and even if they are they’ll probably just go with the roster filler at AAA.

I maintain that Jackson Williams will never be in the majors for the Giants.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.

by groug on May 3, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Holm got hurt yesterday, I think Williams would have been called up today.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 6:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's right

Andres Torres, emergency catcher, is hurt. Oh noes.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 4, 2009 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m pretty sure we’d see Whiteside before we’d see Williams this season.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on May 4, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree'd

I don’t actually know who Whiteside is…but Williams is so far from the majors right now there’s no chance we see him this year. I think it’s kind of early to rule him out of ever making the major leagues, after all you don’t have to be much of a hitter to get a chance at backup C, but as of right now he’s put up a .538 OPS in the SAL and currently a .629 OPS in Connecticut. No chance he’s up in the majors any time soon.

As looking at the stats I see Whiteside is our Fresno C…

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whiteside is a 28 year old career minor leaguer...

…just like our last three backup catchers.

He had a cup of coffee with Baltimore a couple of years ago.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on May 4, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HITTIST!

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ryan Rohlinger’s line in Connecticut last year: .285 / .358 / .497
Williams’s line in Connecticut last year: .226 / .305 / .302

Not really comprable.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like comparing apples to garbage

"Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense."
Only [hella] games left until the end of Zito's contract.
Adoptive father of "Poncho" Villalona: This Angel don't fly. Nothing about him is light.

by thehavenot on May 3, 2009 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s Williams’s line in Connecticut THIS year, I meant.

His combined Augusta/San Jose line last year was .205 / .292 / .292, which is especially sad since it didn’t come in Connecticut.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point is that Rohlinger was laughably unqualified to be promoted to the major leagues last year. Rohlinger was slightly less unqualified than Williams is, Bocock slightly more, but the principle is the same.

Speaking of Rohlinger, wasn’t there some talk of moving him to second? I’m sorry that hasn’t happened, especially since he’s hitting okay at Fresno.

by Evan on May 4, 2009 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn’t Bocock called up because he was the best defensive shortstop the Giants had, non-Vizquel division? I remember him getting the nod for that reason alone, ignoring his offensive shortcomings. Bad idea, by the way.

I'm thinking but nothing's happening.

by JRPhillips on May 5, 2009 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. Unless he is an absolute failure at calling games, or his arm falls off, there is no reason to shift him. He is one of the very few catchers out there that is projected to be a plus defender and plus bat. You don’t diminish that value by sticking him in a different spot, just because you’re shy at that spot. If you need a second baseman, go get a second baseman, don’t diminish your strengths for positional concerns.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could definitely see Posey go the Craig Biggio route down the line – he looks like a special hitter – but for now, the fact that he’s a catcher only adds to his value, and scouts say he could become a very good defensive catcher.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 11:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Sure, why not?

…and let’s trade for Nick Swisher to set-up for Wilson in 8th while we’re at it.

The outdoor harvest isn’t until September, so I don’t know what you got a hold of, but it’s obvious you’re bogarting.

by KrazyKrabMeat on May 3, 2009 12:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't see 2B as a big enough need to warrant the move.

If Burriss doesn’t work out, there’s Frandsen. If he doesn’t work out there’s Downs. In two years Noonan might be ready, or Brock Bond might break out, or Rohlinger or Gillaspie might be moved to second. That’s a lot of mights, but you only need one out of those seven.

Also, if I were Bengie, I’d be looking at this as quite probably my last chance to sign a big contract, and would try hard to get a 3 or more year deal. Signing an extension means trying to get that last big contract at age 36 or 37 instead of 35.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on May 3, 2009 12:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You make sense.

by scout6 on May 3, 2009 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

The organizational options at second are about 10,000 times better than the sub-Posey organizational options at catcher, unless you count Sandoval.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I have a sneaking suspicion that the Giants feel their hole at 3B has amply filled by the ample girsth of one Pablo Sandoval, at least for the nest three years or so.

If Gillaspie and Posey are ready next year, I think Gillaspie at 2B and Posey at C is what we’ll see.

I think the money it would take to re-sign Molina would be better spent on getting a big bat for 1B or OF.

Could the Giants take the Winn, Molina and deferred money coming off the books and turn it into a Holliday?

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 6:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty sure Holliday is getting exposed. 2 homers in his last 200 ab’s and his splits away from Colorado were never top tier anyways.

by Fresburg on May 4, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I say at least offer arbitration to Molina this year. If he accepts, we get a pretty good deal for him still probably. If he declines, pick.

The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Kevin Frandsen should be with the big team.

by WalrusMan on May 4, 2009 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah
What is the problem with this? Bengie Molina is arguably the best hitter in our lineup

We have a very special lineup. Almost everyone is arguably the best hitter.

2006-2009:

Bengie Molina: .285/.312/.452, 95 OPS+

Fred Lewis: .282/.364/.430, 106 OPS+ (but due to some BABIP regressions)

Edgar Renteria : .296/.355/.428, 103 OPS+

Aaron Rowand: .282/.347/.452, 103 OPS+

Randy Winn: .290/.347/.423, 98 OPS+

Rich Aurilia: .278/.329/.434, 94 OPS+

And I’d also expect Sandoval and Schierholtz to both be about as a good as Molina this year, if not better. And of all these players, Molina is probably the least likely to maintain his current production, except for maybe Lewis and Renteria.

Also, if you move Posey from catcher now, he’ll probably never go back. What are you going to do in 2012, when you want to turn him back into a catcher? Simply stick him at catcher even though he’s only played 30 pro games there in his career, all in A+ or lower, and hasn’t played the position (which is considered one of the hardest, if not the hardest one to play) in 3 years? Or send down one of your best hitters (presumably by then) to the minors to learn a new position?

If you really want a short-term offensive improvement, I’d just sign Mark DeRosa after this year to play 2B. He’s a much better hitter than Molina, less of a collapse risk, shouldn’t cost too much, and would allow us to keep Posey where he is most valuable. It would be better both short-term and long-term.

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry. Because he was awesome once, and, goddammit, he shall be awesome once again!

I hope.

by Cookyman on May 3, 2009 12:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We have a very special lineup. Almost everyone is arguably the best hitter.

irl lol again

by Evan on May 3, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's really true

Spots 1-6 in the lineup are almost interchangeable. 1-7 when Richie is playing. Just a whole lot of mediocrity.

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry. Because he was awesome once, and, goddammit, he shall be awesome once again!

I hope.

by Cookyman on May 3, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+100000000000000
Bengie Molina is arguably the best hitter in our lineup, definitely the best RBI man

That isn’t praise of Molina, it’s damnation of the slapjacks batting 1-6 in the order.

For extra credit:

What franchise has two thumbs and could manage to convert two great catchers into mediocre infielders?

Giants pitching coach Dave Righetti. "I treat Timmy differently from most pitchers: I leave him alone."

card carrying Bochy Hatter

by natteringnabob on May 3, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

THIS ONE!

/points thumbs at Giants

by scout6 on May 3, 2009 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Cookyman’s point is the best one I’ve seen to refute my argument here. My basic point was that replacing Bengie with Buster doesn’t give us the offensive upgrade that we need, because Bengie is also a good hitter. However, if you replace an all american out like Manny with a good hitter like Buster, you get a huge upgrade. I love the fact that Buster is a catcher, because few catchers have the potential to hit like Posey, but for the immediate future, I feel Buster would help us out most by playing second. However the argument to leave Buster at catcher and go out and get somebody is a sound argument. Sign DeRosa, trade for Uggla, or don’t forget that Orlando Hudson only signed a one year deal with the Dodgers.

Proud new dad of Edgardo errr Edgar Renteria!!!

by rxmeister on May 4, 2009 7:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You make a great point; but i guarantee you that Lewis maintains similar production. Schierholtz as good as Molina this year…….when will he get the pt to do that?

by shaolinironlion on May 3, 2009 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mark DeRosa better than Molina?

Uh… No.

Sure he walks more and doesn’t clog up the bases… But for once, can someone give Bengie the credit he deserves when it comes to RISP?

by AmorVincitOmnia on May 3, 2009 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Win values

DeRosa

2006 – 2.9
2007 – 2.6
2008 – 3.8

Molina

2006 – 2.1
2007 – 1.9
2008 – 2.9

by xanthan on May 4, 2009 4:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And, if you want to make the CLUTCH argument.

Career splits for RISP:

DeRosa – .283/.370/.420 — .790 OPS
Molina – .294/.332/.439 — .771 OPS

by xanthan on May 4, 2009 4:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looking past the numbers

A higher batting average with RISP and a higher slugging percentage with RISP = the capacity to drive in runs. Getting more walks with RISP doesn’t drive in runs unless the bases are loaded, and DeRosa’s advantage comes ONLY in OBP.

Leading the Pro-Aaron Rowand contingent on the McC!
You can ridicule me in 2009 if you like...

by ThrillisGone22 on May 6, 2009 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re looking past the numbers by citing different numbers?

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on May 6, 2009 6:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m suggesting looking at what the numbers represent (i.e., what drives in runs, and what doesn’t) vs. merely citing that one OPS is greater than the other.

Leading the Pro-Aaron Rowand contingent on the McC!
You can ridicule me in 2009 if you like...

by ThrillisGone22 on May 6, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no but it puts MORE guys on base that can possibly be driven in later

I mean, just because the Giants are ecstatic to score 1 run when they get 2 men on with no outs, doesn’t mean the rest of baseball feels that way.

Besides, I don’t think the arguement (.790 vs. 771 OPS) should be interpreted as “DeRosa is better in the clutch (which is a useless measure anyway)” but rather he’s a better hitter AND at least as good in the clutch.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 6, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why don’t we put the debate on clutch hitting on hold until at least a shred of evidence comes out that players are capable of altering their performance in “clutch” situations.

by Missing Barry on May 6, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been confused by this, particularly because you always here in broadcasts how certain players will change their approach during different circumstances. Not everyone is a Jeromy Burnitz “Swing from the heels at any and all times” type hitter. For example, if you have a runner at third with nobody out in a 1-1 ballgame in the 9th inning, you might look to just hit one out of the infield to score the run, where nobody on and nobody out in a 9-2 ballgame, you might sit on a specific pitch, or just try to jack one out or whatever.

So where’s the disconnect between what players and broadcasters say about changing your approach versus the argument that players don’t alter their performance in “clutch” situations? And yes, I mean this as an honest-to-goodness question.

I'm thinking but nothing's happening.

by JRPhillips on May 6, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Players hit about the same in “clutch” situations as they do the rest of the time.

by xanthan on May 6, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

clearly what it means

is that changing their approach doesn’t actually change the results

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 6, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alright, you and xanthan are both on my list now. I mean seriously, I put a little too much time into crafting my question, the least you could do is reply with an answer of maybe two sentences each. This quick answer that’s apparently obvious to all but me? Not cool.

Otherwise, I now understand the disconnect.

I'm thinking but nothing's happening.

by JRPhillips on May 6, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Basically there are a lot of things people believe to be true – this particular one is that a player can change their approach to alter their performance in certain situations. A number of people out there have run tests to see if this is actually true (I’ve read research from multiple people, but am too lazy to look any of it up and give you links), and they’ve found no evidence of any change in players hitting performance in a clutch situation as opposed to any other situation. It does make some sense though – if a player were able to perform better in the clutch, why wouldn’t they want to always perform that well?

As for your situation, for players looking to do something like hit a sac fly – honestly, I’ve never seen any research dealing with specific scenarios like this, so I have no idea how capable players are of accomplishing a task like that. In certain cases, it may be that it’s so difficult to change the results (being better in the clutch, hitting sac flies), that most batters aren’t capable of it, and even though some may be, there aren’t enough of them for it to show up in the data.

Just keep in mind – people by nature are not capable of making unbiased observations. A lot of time people will come to believe a certain thing to be true when it’s not because they’re looking for it, or it’s something that stands out to them. Just for example, let’s assume players don’t change their results by adjusting their approach. It may be that they adjust their approach to hit a sac fly, but it doesn’t actually accomplish anything. When they do hit a sac fly, however, they will remember it as being successful, and when they don’t hit one, they’ll subconsciously dismiss it because chances are they weren’t going to do it anyways. So they perceive success, even though it isn’t true.

by Missing Barry on May 6, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am not trying to be a jerk

but why be verbose when sucinct will do? I suppose I left off another idea.

Maybe they say they are changing their approach, maybe they even THINK they are changing their approach… but there is no qualitative difference.

Think about it another way – if I shorten my swing and try to make contact or make a productive out, maybe I am slightly more sucessful at that outcome. If I do not try that – maybe I hit fewer singles and sac flies but more walks, doubles, and HR. Those this aren’t just “gravy” or “wasted PAs” – they help the team win too – because unless it’s really a walk off situation, every run – and every baserunner – and every out not made counts.

I am of the opinion that a batter should NEVER be lauded for a productive out outside of a walk off situation. I think it fosters a bad attitude that it’s OK to make outs if a little something good happens. Outs are terrible. Outs are poison to offense. Sac flies are like … I dunno… chemotherapy when you aren’t sure you have cancer.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 6, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is there any way to split Molina’s RISP numbers off for just what he’s done in SF? Seems like he’s been more clutchy than that since he arrived here.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 6, 2009 3:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you want to make the CLUTCH argument, why not use a context oriented stat like WPA?

WPA’s for Molina and DeRosa

Molina

2007 (-0.58)
2008 (0.65)
2009 (0.29)

DeRosa

2007 (0.61)
2008 (1.80)
2009 (+0.31)

He’s still the better player.

by xanthan on May 6, 2009 6:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t disagree your larger point, but Pablo caught a handful of games last season, moved to 3B and ignored catching all Spring. When he caught Zito the other day, he looked fine.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 6:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Goofus = Antonio Alfonseca?

Pablo caught 94 games last year.

Adoptive parent of Noah Lowry. Because he was awesome once, and, goddammit, he shall be awesome once again!

I hope.

by Cookyman on May 4, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SCHIERHOLTZ TO SECOND

Seriously though, it’s an interesting enough idea, but like many people said before, how good is Posey at second and when will Bengie stop producing?

On the run from Johnny Law, aint no trip to Cleveland, or San Francisco.

by PAWarrior on May 3, 2009 12:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Schierholtz is a third baseman

stop trying to be funny.

Proud father of Dallas Mcpherson, the Babe Ruth of AAA.

by The Thrill on May 3, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

STOP POSTING THESE FICTIONALS

Giants pitching coach Dave Righetti. "I treat Timmy differently from most pitchers: I leave him alone."

card carrying Bochy Hatter

by natteringnabob on May 3, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

With Frandsen, Downs, Noonan, and Burriss (who I don’t have a lot of faith in but could possibly turn it around) I think declaring Posey the second baseman of the future is a little silly.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.

by groug on May 3, 2009 12:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Right. We all know he’s the future closer.

by xanthan on May 3, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He throws 94, so he says

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 4, 2009 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He worked with Chris Lincecum !

"One percent of ballplayers are leaders of men. The other ninety-nine percent are followers of women."-John McGraw, NY Giants Baseball Club

My adopted son Matt Downs . Ranked as the 24th best prospect in the Giants farm system by Baseball America !!

by nvsfg on May 4, 2009 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Executive 1: Well, my immediate reaction is no, but I’ve got kind of a yessy aftertaste.

Executive 2: There’s a part of me that loves it. Then there’s this other part of me that hates the first part for loving it ’cause the second part hates it.

Executive 3: I’m forgainst it.

(from the film Run Ronnie Run)

Please Jesus, don't let us be like the Cubs.

by SimpleJaquez on May 3, 2009 12:36 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

irl lol

by Evan on May 3, 2009 1:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If

We are moving Buster, why dont we put him at Short? Noonan will be our 2nd. I know you are saying short term, but if they move him, they are moving him long term. I think we should leave him, but I can understand the sentiment to get him in there. Leave him, deal with Pablo at 3rd, put Anvil at first, and we have ourselves a good team. If Pablo has to move to first, I want Anvil in Left.

by gimpsta7 on May 3, 2009 4:31 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ouch

I think my brain just exploded

The absentee father of Edwin "Cue Ball" Quirarte, now that he is doin well in the minors, its time to get back in his life, and in his checking account!

by TexasRanger on May 3, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

don’t know about second, especially: it seems that’d be a position that would need a lot of refining for mlb. and i’m not entirely sold on his ability to produce offensively for a second baseman (catcher, sure, shortstop, maybe, i think second is pushing it) in 2010 or 2011 compared to kevin frandsen/burris with another pro season under his belt/matt downs after starting all year at AAA.

but i really like the idea of posey taking groundballs all over the infield this year and next in the minors, and the giants figuring out a position he can back-up consistently. me thinks he’d be a better third baseman than pablo, and maybe in the near future they could share third base and both stay fresh for 150+ games a year.

and i think the giants need to let bengie go after this season. he’s due to decline in the next couple years (if not this year after he cools off), and i dont see his improvement over one of posey or a new third baseman (with the possibility of sandoval sliding to catcher or playing third one more year) being worth keeping around. those knees have caught A LOT of games, especially the last few years.

Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.

by jasomack on May 3, 2009 4:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Why would we want our primary C to be a back up for other positions on the field? The only team that I know of who has done this is the Dodgers, and look how well that turned out for Russell Martin (he absolutely collapsed down the stretch). Posey is a catcher. He is a plus defender at the position, and his bat plays well there. Low-power, high contact rate is not what we should be shooting for at third, and it’s a waste to stick him at second considering how many other options we have internally for that position in a year or two. Hate to say it again, but when the Twins (or whoever signs him) move Mauer from C to first or third, his value is going to go way down, even if he is a defensive whiz.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Posey’s bat plays above-ML-average as so many seem to think it will, I think it’d be worthwhile for him to maintain the ability to get out of the squat and into the field a couple times a week rather than only start 120 games a year. Martin has played 151 (2007) and 155 (2008) games the last couple years, and been one of the better catchers in the league. Last year, he started 138 times at catcher… I honestly don’t think the 71 (!!!) innings at 3B contributed to his 2nd half slump.

I agree with you about the value though. You can’t just go out and replace Mauer as a catcher, and Sandoval and Posey’s value is certainly in their ability to be above-average hitters playing the catcher position…

however comma if we’re stuck in the unfortunate position of having two catchers that hit well and can field well somewhere else, and who hit better than the rest of the infield, why not spot start them elsewhere (keeping their bats in the lineup most games) and keep an above-average catcher starting there every game of the year? if sandoval is suitable for 3b this year, why not posey in the second half of 2010? i think there’s a distinct possibility that it could lead to an improvement in overall production from both 3B and C next year, which combined with a few improvements in the rest of the team could lead to legitimate contention.

or we could just have a real infield. but i just don’t see that happening until 2011 or 2012.

Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.

by jasomack on May 5, 2009 3:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I honestly don’t think the 71 (!!!) innings at 3B contributed to his 2nd half slump.

Martin himself admits that he did wear down because of overplaying:

This couldn’t be the same restless kid who did whatever he could to talk his way out of days off last season and played 155 games, could it? But there was Martin, seated in front of his locker, nodding in agreement when told of Manager Joe Torre’s desire to limit him to 140 games behind the plate this season. “Before I just lied to myself even if I didn’t feel good. I was just hardheaded, saying I was ready to play 162 games. You just lose that edge, you lose that explosiveness, you know? A day off can do a lot further down the road.”

He spoke at length about this same topic in another article, just can’t find it. You gain so much more having a fresh catcher behind the dish with an occasional day off than having a worn down catcher/3B playing 150, 155 games a year. I know the Indians are having some success with Victor Martinez splitting time between C and 1B, but 1B is a less demanding position and he can DH on days when his legs are toast. NL teams, like the Braves, with top Cs don’t do this with their guys.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 5, 2009 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, I should have been clearer. I was trying to make the point that if he was overworked, it wasn’t due so much from his time at 3B (less than 8 total games) than the heavy workload behind the plate. Saying the 3B time it didn’t “contribute” to his slump was poor wording, though.

Also, you can’t trust anything a Dodgers player says. I hear he double dips and cheats on his taxes.

Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.

by jasomack on May 6, 2009 4:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

1 man, 3 names

Juan Carlos Perez

When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realized God doesn’t work that way, so I stole one and prayed for forgiveness. - Emo Philips

Proud father of Juan Carlos Perez. Think Albert Pujols at second.

by marcello on May 3, 2009 5:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You down with JCP?

Yeah, you know me!

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on May 3, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we are missing the big prize here

Buster Posey clearly needs to be our GM. That way he can draft/sign/acquire lots of players just like him! Plus, he played an inning at GM during college.

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on May 3, 2009 5:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I’ve never seen Posey play. If he can play 2nd than put him their, but only if the reason is to move Pablo to catcher.

by shaolinironlion on May 3, 2009 6:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Posey projects to be a better all-around catcher than Pablo. If we’re shuffling players around, why don’t we stick Pablo where all the scouts seem to believe he is destined to play, first base, and leave the defensively better Posey behind the plate?

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leave Posey alone! The prospect who needs to move to second is Brandon Crawford, in order to make room for Ehire Adrianza at short. Of course this doesn’t have to happen this year, or even maybe the next. As long as Crawford gets some experience at second before both reach the majors. I’m looking forward to an infield of Crawford at second, Adrianza at short, Villalona at first, Posey at catcher, and someone other than Sandoval at third. If Burris actually learns how to hit, I’d be happy with Crawford at third. Pablo can learn to play left and be a super sub at other positions.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 9:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Considering Crawford is closer to the majors, hitting a lot better than Adrianza so far, and reputed to be a very good defender, I suspect it would be Adrianza who would have to move if it came to that.

As with first base, Sandoval loses a lot of his value if you stick him in left field.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And the same that’s been said about Catcher/2B applies to SS/2B as well – the Giants have a lot more organizational depth at second base than they do at shortstop. It would be kind of crazy to move their best shortstop prospect to second. Especially after they already inexplicably did so with Burriss.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is, in fact, why it was crazy to move Burriss to 2B.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 5:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Adrianza looks to be much more than a very good defender. This guy’s defense makes people like JT Snow drool in anticipation, with words like “a young Vizquel” used to describe his game. You don’t move a guy like that. Too early to say for either Crawford or Adrianza, but I’m loving the idea of both of them in the same infield. I’ve no problem with Crawford as a shortstop, but given the defense of both players, I like Adrianza there, with Crawford at either second or third.

With Sandoval, I just don’t buy the idea that a certain position has to produce certain types of offensive numbers. If Sandoval can continue to hit, he needs to find a spot where his glove hurts them the least. That looks to be either catcher or left field to me. With Posey coming on at catcher, I don’t see Pablo starting there for long, if at all.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to see Adrianza pull his slugging percentage above .300 and play more than a couple dozen games over the rookie ball level before I annoint him the shortstop of the future and everyone else better get out of the way, regardless of what J.T. Snow might say about his defense. By pretty much any standard, Crawford has got to be considered ahead of Adrianza on the prospect totem pole right now, and it’s premature at best to talk about moving him away from shortstop, especially when defense has always been seen as one of his strengths and, as I said, the organization has a lot more depth at the position you’re proposing moving him to than the one you’re proposing moving him from.

Your argument about Sandoval reminds me of what I was saying in favor of starting Bill Mueller at third in 1997, except in 1997 the Giants had more than enough offense and power to play a guy like Mueller at a position for which his offensive profile seems ill-suited. That’s not really the case with the 2009 Giants. Oh, and also, the position you want to move him to – left field – is currently occupied with one of the Giants better players, albeit one who’s been slumping lately.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And, y'know

If their current developmental tracks hold, Crawford will probably have a shot at making the majors at least a year before Adrianza. Maybe a couple years. So why would you even think of moving Crawford NOW? If he becomes a special hitter, and Adrianza becomes a special defender, you can always move Crawford over to second or third down the line when they’re both ready to contribute. I really don’t see any particular advantage to moving him now.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you reread my original post, you will notice I don’t propose moving Crawford NOW. I propose he get some experience at second and/or third before he reaches the majors. In fact I’d be AGAINST moving him now. For the immediate future (i.e. the next year or so) he should stay at short. I only suggest second because he looks like he could handle the position and I’m not yet convinced Burris is the answer. Third maybe a better option, if Burris works out.

I suggest moving Crawford to second INSTEAD of the proposal in the OP of moving Posey there, for a very simple and, I think, good reason. It projects for a better defensive lineup of Giants prospects in future years than moving a superior looking catcher to second. Such an idea weakens the defense at both catching and second. Moving Crawford to second and starting Adrianza at short, while keeping Posey behind the plate, gives the best defense outlook for the future. All of which, I freely admit, is highly speculative, and based on good things happening to all of these guys. Of course, the whole damn thread is based on just such speculation.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if you’ll reread my post, I said that it’s extremely premature to even think about moving Crawford.

I suggest not moving Crawford and not moving Posey.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think I suggested you said anything else. However, for a good discussion, I think it’s best we both quote the other accurately. Which is why I corrected your mistaken statement of my position.

It’s nice to see that, for the immediate future, we both agree on not moving either player. For the longer range, assuming Adrianza’s defense is a good as advertised, and assuming he shows he can hit major league pitching, I’d rather have the best glove at short.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just read your original comment again, and I don’t think it can really be said I represented you inaccurately in this regard. You said that Crawford “has” to move, but that doesn’t “have to” happen this year or even next. I said, “So why would you even think of moving Crawford NOW?” and “I really don’t see any particular advantage to moving him now.” Looking back, I can see that was unnecessarily ambiguous – it does sort of look as though I might be saying that you want him to switch positions tomorrow, which you weren’t. I probably came across as caricaturing your opinion, which is a rhetorical technique I’m not always averse to but which wasn’t my intention here. Let me rephrase for clarity:

If their current developmental tracks hold, Crawford will probably have a shot at making the majors at least a year before Adrianza. Maybe a couple years. So at this point why would you even think of moving Crawford? If he becomes a special hitter, and Adrianza becomes a special defender, you can always think about Crawford over to second or third down the line. At this point I really don’t see any particular advantage to moving Crawford.

In other words, I can conceived of a future in which it would make sense to think about moving Crawford to shortstop, but I’m skeptical that such a time will come and I think it’s silly to talk about contingency plans that are, in baseball terms, a lifetime away from relevancy.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I should also point out that, for your Move-Crawford-to-Second scenario to make sense, you have to assume a lot of things will happen:

1) Crawford continues to hit well enough that he needs to be in the lineup because of his bat
2) Adrianza’s defense lives up to the hype
3) Adrianza becomes a good enough hitter to survive in the majors
4) Noonan isn’t good enough to displace either Crawford or Noonan from the lineup
5) No other prospect comes along who’s more compelling at second than Crawford

Could all these things happen? Absolutely. But unless they all do happen, there’s really no need to even consider moving Crawford, and those are a lot of ifs. Saying it’s something that “has” to happen is, as I said, extremely premature at best.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to see Adrianza do a lot more with the bat as well. I’d like to see Crawford continue his hot hitting through this year and next, with an eye to breaking in the majors in 2011 – if all goes well. By that time Renteria’s contract is up, and if Adrainza isn’t ready yet, I’ve no problem in seeing a young Brandon stepping into the role. I just think when you have a special defensive talent like Adrianza appears he may be, you don’t move him to a position where his glove isn’t exploited to the fullest.

btw, who said anything about the 2009 Giants squad? By the time Crawford and/or Adrianza are ready, the club will be very different. Including it is likely that Winn and/or Rowand maybe gone. We will also know by then if Lewis is really ready to start in the majors. All of which possibly opens up left for Sandoval, if he continues to show he can hit.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way, don’t even think of moving Crawford.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 3, 2009 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you’re being incredibly presumptuous about Adrianza’s future.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.

by groug on May 3, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol, I’m being presumptuous about Posey’s, Crawford’s, Villalona’s, AND Adrianza’s futures. None of these guys are sure bets to be stars in the Majors, but all of them show glimpses of brilliance. As I said, I’m looking forward to seeing them play and reach their potential. It’s been a long time since I could say that about so many Giants minor league position players.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posey and Crawford and Villalona have shown waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more than Adrianza has.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 3, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True. Which one looks to be the best defensive shortstop? I’m not knocking any of these guys. I’d love to see all of them start and be stars for the Giants for years to come. I just love defense, and when people I trust know something about defense tell me Adrianza is special, as in Omar Vizquel special, I sit up and take notice.

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Crazy. You took some Adrianza kool aid and put a whole hell of a lot of vodka in it. And I say this as one who is very bullish on Adrianza.

Way too much can happen, and until a player reaches the the majors or is ready to, one should nearly always have them play in the minors at the highest positional value they can rightly play—especially among positions which are easy to transfer from.

Crawford is a very good defender. Maybe he keeps at it, and becomes what his tools allow for (likely not, but we hope), and maybe Adrianza keeps playing D at this level, and continue to hit (again, not likely, but we hope), reaching the majors at least a year after Crawford. Well then we can figure out what to do. By the way, did you play the Lotto last night and win?

Adoptive Parent of Francisco Peguero. He can throw, he can run, he can hit(fastballs), and he's Dominican. What else do you need to know?

"Obviously I’m not doing things like going toe-to-toe with a ninja. Find me a ninja, for one."--Brian Wilson

by haverecords on May 4, 2009 3:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

kindly read before replying

As I said above, I’m not for switching Crawford anytime soon. I want, assuming all goes well with both Crawford and Adrianza, for both players to play short for now. I advocate playing people at their best defensive position, and when you have two players at the same position, playing the best defensive player there and looking to shift the other player to another position. This not a controversial idea. It is common sense. Putting the best defense on the field helps win games. OK?

Now, a lot can happen between now, and when any shift may have to take place (AAA or even the majors.) One or the other, or both, players may not work out. Injuries happen all too often. Another player playing the same position my explode on the scene, etc. etc.

In the meantime, save the snark for someone who is interested.

by Sayhey on May 4, 2009 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This seems reasonable

and thus I doubt the Giants would consider it. I absolutely agree that we should keep people at their most-demanding defensive positions as long as possible. But I’m open to switching Crawford to 3B if Ehire becomes the next Vizquel.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BUT HE PLAYED IN AAA FOR 4 AT-BATS LAST YEAR!

by xanthan on May 4, 2009 4:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posey and Villalona are among the top 100 prospects in all of baseball. Crawford has had maybe the best start of any hitter in the system. Meanwhile, Adrianza doesn’t usually crack the top 10 list for the Giants and has played very little above Rookie ball. And he came into this season with a lower minor league slugging percentage than Burriss or Bocock.

You’re right, of course, that none of these guys are sure things. That’s true of every single player in the minor leagues. But it’s still apples and oranges.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a debut at number six is pretty damn good!

by Sayhey on May 3, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand he has a great glove, but that seems comically high for someone who’s never really hit.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.

by groug on May 3, 2009 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not aware of any other list that had Adrianza in the top ten. Given that Baggarly also had Jackson Williams at #16 this year and Eugenio Velez at #7 last year, I’m a bit skeptical of guys he ranks a lot higher than anyone else.

To be fair, I don’t think anyone had Crawford in the top ten.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 3, 2009 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't like Posey...

as a catcher until I read that he was picking up the play calling very quickly.

His ability to play all the other positions will help him catch. Remember, the catcher acts as the “field general” for every single play, making him (nearly) as important as the pitcher. I’d rather have a great athlete at such a position. The Giants love his natural leadership and his ability to learn quickly. And he’s still hitting well. That’s enough for me.

by coicoy on May 3, 2009 11:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This is my fantasy idea...

I really want Posey to try 2nd base.
I know it’s not “that easy” to just switch a guy over to a new position, so no one should state the obvious.
I just want the Giants to succeed.. And when I see success, I see Bengie, Posey and Sandoval all in the lineup at the same time.
I wouldn’t count on Bengie being the catcher for more than 2010, but I personally believe an extension for 2010 is reasonable.

Also, you could obviously try Posey at 2B starting at any time… Now, winter or spring to see if he’s capable, and if such an idea were to come true, extra work at 2B would be necessary.

So don’t just dismiss the idea… I wouldn’t say the Giants should definitely do it.. But consider it, and cross our fingers.

by AmorVincitOmnia on May 3, 2009 11:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

so your theory is based on crossing our fingers?

by Fresburg on May 4, 2009 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, but why would you want to move a special player at a defensively thin position like Posey? Sure, he might not hit like Bengie right away, but what is the guarantee that Bengie will hit like Bengie next year? And what do we have to show for it if he goes into a sudden, steep decline? After this season, Bengie may be a Type A or B player, so draft picks should be available if we offer arb. If he accepts arb, well then hey, we have a mentor for Posey, but to block someone who (though this is early) looks to be gearing up to be ready by ST 2010 is nuts.

I am really opposed to yanking players around to cram them into lineups; Posey’s value is as a catcher. He is not significantly blocked at the position, provided he’s ready to go out of ST next year. I’d rather have Posey in the position than the Ghost of Molina or Sandoval (if we’re moving him off of C, save a personal caddy job for Zito, let the man learn that position and let him be). Not every physically gifted player can be jerked around and succeed like Biggio.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok...

“but what is the guarantee that Bengie will hit like Bengie next year?”

What is the guarantee that any player will hit like we hope they will hit next year?
My only evidence to point to him not sucking next year is that he has shown NO signs of decline.
I’m not stupid to the point where if Bengie were to show considerable decline this year, that I’d still think we should resign him and move Posey to a different position.

Plus, I only suggested ONE more season. It would be the equivalent of the Renteria low-cost signing.

“what do we have to show for it if he goes into a sudden, steep decline?”

Essentially what we would have to show had we not signed him for 2010 in the first place… Unless the Giants are looking to sign a replacement in 2010.
Either way, we have Sandoval to replace him if he’s injured in 2010, or sucks in 2010. And it’s only for one season so it isn’t the worst thing in the world.

“Bengie may be a Type A or B player”

I don’t know much about how free agency works, so I wouldn’t be able to state a good opinion on such a matter.
So assume you have me pegged here, cuz I certainly wouldn’t want to ruin any part of the draft for Bengie.

“Not every physically gifted player can be jerked around and succeed like Biggio.”

I just don’t understand these arguments.
Cuz this could be said as well: “Not every physically gifted player can stick around one position and succeed. Some just turn out to be like Todd Linden.”
Everyone has this massive fear of doing such things, but if you bring it up to an actual baseball player, they probably wouldn’t mind it all that much and could honestly make the transition fairly smoothly if given the time and patience. The only reason why we don’t know this for sure is because no one ever really tries it.

by AmorVincitOmnia on May 4, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Bengie hitting like Bengie vs. any player hitting like they’re projected – there is no guarantee that anyone will hit like they should, you’re right, however I think there is probably historical precedent that a 35-year old catcher will not improve and will likely decline. I’d rather all in on Posey (provided he continues to maintain or improve as he’s promoted) than pay millions to a vet catcher in decline that a manager will feel compelled to start.

Regarding teams not moving players – lots of teams try this. The Padres stuck Chase Headley – a superior third baseman – in LF because he was blocked by Kouzmanoff, and the collected wisdom is that if the Padres are ever able to trade Kouz, they’d stick Headley right back at third. (They’re having their top 1B prospect, Kyle Blanks, taking flies in LF, so moving Kouz and shifting Headley back to third might be coming sooner than thought.) Ian Stewart is blocked at third, so they’re sticking him at second whenever possible until they can trade Atkins and return him to third or until Helton DLs, Atkins shifts to 1B and Stewart goes back to 3B. The difference – IMO – is that the catching position is harder to master and catching prospects need to practice in order to succeed. If every catching prospect could just go out and play other positions without it hurting their development, they would.

My main problem with all this fantasy multi-position roto talk is that Posey’s value is as a catcher. To shift him to another position, even if for a year, diminishes his value to the team AND could potentially damage his development at the catcher position. A lot of players could play other positions, but they don’t because they are more valuable in the position they’re in.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would argue that your view of Posey’s high value is colored by fantasy/roto thinking. He has value as a hitter, period. Yes, it would be cool if we could have Johnny Bench at C, Jeff Kent at 2B, Cal Ripken at SS, and Mantle or Mays in CF. It’s always swell to have great hitting coming from a defense-first position. But we lack great hitting at offense-first positions. Fred Lewis is not your prototypical slugging LF. Randy Winn is nowhere near your prototypical RF. Ishikawa could maybe possibly become averagish at 1B in a JT kind of way. Pablo at 3B seems to have a chance to imitate 3B offensive numbers. So I would say that we are too talent-poor to be considering which china pattern to choose – we need a table and chairs first. If Buster is a great hitter (although maybe lacking Smoak-like power), let’s make every attempt to keep him healthy and in our lineup for years to come.

Yes, we need to get power from somewhere, and 1B/3B/LF/RF are the traditional places you look. But Posey at 3B would not be an abomination value-wise, and would maintain his value over a longer period of time.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s less fantasy/roto thinking and more long-term team construction thinking. If you want to improve your lineup and you have 1B or LF open, it’s fairly easy to find someone that can hit a little bit, whereas finding C’s that can hit is a much harder thing to do. 3B is also closer to 1B/LF than C in terms of how easy it is to find guys who can hit. If this was a hypothetical scenario where it was “let’s call up Buster right now what position should he play?” and we looked at our lineup and Bengie was outproducing Ishikawa it would make some sense to stick him at 1B for the time being, but we’re focused on the long term Giants, and Posey at C makes him way more valuable than Posey anywhere else.

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trust me, not colored by fantasy/roto – that is exactly what I think a lot of people here seem to be doing by thinking that Pablo can play C full-time and be a ‘stud’ catcher and that Posey can move anywhere on the diamond and retain value. Every single talent evaluator that I’ve read (Baseball America, Baseball Prospectus, Keith Law, etc.) agrees that Posey’s value is as a catcher. Sticking Posey at 3B – when he is projected to be a top catcher – because of a fear that he may break down eventually absolutely is an abomination value-wise. There is no indication that he won’t be healthy through his initial contract with the Giants. None. His value is not in being a great athlete and average overall hitter, it is in being a plus defender behind the plate with hitting stats that are top-5-10 at the catcher position. By thinking that his bat can play at any position in the field discounts how much value his combined offense and defense will add to the team behind the plate. He is a catcher. Unless he is injured and a move is necessitated, he should stay behind the plate.

Also, you’re right that Giants have stuck round pegs in square holes all over the diamond going against the widely accepted standard of positional value; that’s not really working out great, and is something that hopefully the club will work on as they start to bring up players/sign free agents. You don’t take a guy like Posey and stick him at a position where his numbers will be diminished and his defense pluses will be wasted just because you can’t find anyone better for that position in the short term. If you have a top C but you need a better 2B, you go get a better 2B, not move the top C. That’s like saying, well, the Phillies could save a little money and trade Howard, then just slide Utley over, he’s a good hitter; it weakens both spots.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm, where to start? Let’s start with the Phillies analogy. The Giants are not in a similar situation – we have no Ryan Howard-type hitter. I don’t propose we trade away David Wright to put Buster at 3B, or trade away Utley to put Buster at 2B, or trade away Ripken to put Buster at SS. I agree, the Phillies should NOT trade Howard and move Utley to 1B. However, if they didn’t already have Howard, and saw no immediate hope of acquiring a stud 1B, and saw a reasonable likelihood of finding a decent 2B, then moving Utley to 1B (replacing an Ishikawa-like player, perhaps) would be a good option. imho.

Again, I’m just not an absolutist on these positional profiles. We’ve discussed the Jeff Kent Principle™ before on this site: having a 2B like Kent afforded us the luxury of having JT at 1B, and having a SS like Aurilia afforded us the luxury of having Bell or Mueller at 3B. That does not mean, of course, that the Giants should not have tried to draft and develop a better-hitting 1B or 3B during those years.

In the same vein, Buster Posey is Buster Posey, no matter where he plays defense (assuming his defense is adequate – and I am assuming that). He will hit what he will hit. It’s the value of, or perhaps the availability of, the replacement player(s) that I think we disagree about. I maintain that we can, fairly easily, get an adequate, defense-first, catcher to replace Buster….and we can do so more easily than trade for or draft and develop a stud 3B, or even 2B. It is the gaping void at positions like 3B and 1B (and, nowadays, in the SF outfield) and the unlikeliness that we can easily find quality hitters at those positions, that makes me think we should move Posey.

Here’s a thought: we got value out Benito Santiago. We signed Bengie Molina. Those guys were very useful. Did we get lucky with them? Perhaps. I don’t even expect Molina-level quality from my replacement-level catcher. But I think we can get Yorvit Torrealba-level quality. Let’s put Posey at 3B, sign the next Torrealba/Molina, and focus on finding a Justin Smoak or Rich Poythress or Bobby Borchering for 1B.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 5, 2009 7:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point isn’t that a player has to fit a certain profile – Randy Winn contributed 4.5 wins above replacement last year (by Fangraphs calculations) and Fred Lewis contributed 2.3, both decent to good players that don’t fit the corner outfielder profile. The point is, that when constructing a roster, you leave a guy like Posey at C because it’s much easier to find a 3B or 2B that can hit at a certain level than a C. Last season Bengie Molina had a nice season for us, for all C with 300+ PA in MLB he had the 9th highest OPS at .767. Replacing that kind of production by aquiring a C is much more difficult than to replace it with a 3B (with Posey at C). Last season, there were TWENTY-FIVE 3B with 300+ PA that had a higher OPS than Molina. Finding one of those 25 is not difficult, and much easier/cheaper than finding a C to replace that. That’s why long term, Posey is more valuable at C (plus defensively he’s profiled to be better at C than any other position).

The basic concept why Posey is so much more valuable at C is the fact that you greatly overestimate what your replacement level C is going to give you – it’s going to be far less than other positions like 1B, 3B, or even 2B. By the way, why do we have to find a Smoak or a Poythress or a Borchering (who are Pothress and Bochering anyways?), we already have a Villalona. Not that having two big time prospects is a bad thing…just not necessarily a dire need.

by Missing Barry on May 5, 2009 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This

Posey at C plus Mark DeRosa, Orlando Hudson, etc. OR Posey at 2B plus John Buck, Nick Hundley, etc. I guarantee that the offensive stats from the first pairing will best the second by a healthy margin. It will be FAR easier to pair a stud C – which we have – with a mediocre 2B and get good results than to turn said stud C into a possible middle-of-the-pack 2B and pair him with a no-bat C. The only reason to move a good bat catcher into an infielder is if he can’t field. Posey can field, ergo we should leave him be.

Put another way, if we move Posey to 2B he becomes, if he meets the most likely projections I keep reading, a Mark DeRosa/Kelly Johnson middle of the pack 2B. If we leave him at C, he is a Geovanny Soto-type (with less power and maybe more contact) and a top-5 catcher.

Sorry you didn’t like the Phillies analogy – I obviously wasn’t saying we had a Howard, just trying to illustrate that if you move Utley to first, whoever plays 2B is going to suck in comparison, and Utley-Howard is far more valuable than Utley-Donald. Posey-DeRosa > Posey-Nick Hundley.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 5, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you

Ding Ding Ding
IAWTC
+1

by wilriv21 on May 4, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Posey's call up date
So assume you have me pegged here, cuz I certainly wouldn’t want to ruin any part of the draft for Bengie.

“Type A or Type B” refers to the rating that baseball gives Bengie based on his performance. Its effect on the Giants is that their compensatory pick for losing him to free agency is better the better his rating is. So the point was that it’s better to lose him after a good year than a bad one.

As for calling up Buster, I don’t think there’s a catcher in MLB who’s been called up before completing two full seasons in the minors, usually three or four. Since Buster’s in his first, it’s hard to believe he’ll be a starting catcher before 2011 at the soonest.

"[Greg] Vaughn is in a funk so deep, George Clinton wearing a miner's helmet couldn't find him."
- Jim Baker, ESPN.com, May 2002

by achiappanza on May 4, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

remember when we had guys who could ACTUALLY hit?

As opposed to being “pretty decent hitters for a catcher”

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 5, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My two cents.

If he is going to be such a good hitter why do you want to play him at catcher? They wear down quickly behind the plate, there are already rumblings of Minny moving Mauer, an all star catcher, to first.

Plus when a guy plays catcher he’s only in the lineup, if he’s good, about 140 games. That’s around 22 games he’s sitting on the bench, three weeks without one of your best hitters. That just doesn’t make good sense to me.

I think it would be a good experiment.

We don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. - Calvin

by solace on May 4, 2009 7:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Mauer’s also like 6’6" or 6’7", which is part of the reason why playing catcher has given him so many knee problems.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 4, 2009 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

It’s Mauer’s size (and now, apparently congenital back problem) that is making them consider moving him, not typical catcher wear and tear that you see with other players like McCann, Martin, etc.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Congenital?

Shit. That’s no good. I have similiar back issues to his, a chronic back sprain. The pain has reduced me to tears and lying down somewhere because moving my lower body hurts. :/

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 4, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

PLEASE STOP CATCHING IMMEDIATELY.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 4, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I highly doubt that it’s congenital, or he never would have been drafted as a catcher. Think chronic, instead.

Joe Martinez: My fingers are crossed and my palms are together for you.
When it's all said and done, America will be remembered for three things: The Bill of Rights, jazz, and baseball.

by cornball on May 4, 2009 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m probably wrong, but what I thought I’ve read is that it’s not an injury so much as a problem he’s likely always had, though not aggravated, with his back (sacroiliac inflammation) that is going to get progressively worse over the course of his athletic career and that it’s so uncommon a problem that they initially had a hard time diagnosing it. Apparently, he’s always had some back pain, but they weren’t sure whether it was because he’s so tall and catching is tough or what. If it is a congenital weakness, they may not have been able to pinpoint it as an 18-year old, though you’re probably right, chronic is a better word in lieu of knowing for sure.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is why the wacky, will-never-happen idea of starting both Pablo and Posey while alternating them at catcher and third base is so brilliant.

by Evan on May 4, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

For a thread filled with a lot of dumb ideas, I have to say this could potentially be an awesome idea…

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 7:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I kind of like this

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 4, 2009 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still kind of love this idea.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 4, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

why not

just trade the lesser of the two for SOMEONE WHO CAN HIT WELL ENOUGH TO PLAY 3B OR 1B.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 5, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pablo’s #6 in VORP for MLB third basemen. If you think that his two partial seasons have been a fluke, that’s one thing. But the available evidence so far suggests he can hit enough for third.

by Grant on May 5, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough

I think I haven’t looked at his stat line in a week… but he’s still more valuable as a catcher.

I guess replace “hit well enough” with “someone who can hit better than the guy we are trading” (be that Posey or Sandoval)

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 5, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

“If he is going to be such a good hitter why do you want to play him at catcher?”

Because catchers generally suck at hitting, so compared to other catchers he gives you way more offensive output, then you fill the rest of your lineup with guys who can hit at least an average amount for their position, and you have a good lineup. Mauer at C = one of the top 5 players in MLB. Mauer at 1B/Dh is a nice player, maybe a borderline all-star at best, though.

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

third position

at best

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 4, 2009 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m confused, what do you mean by third position?

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's one of the stranger adaptations of the Matt Cain=3rd starters, AT BEST joke

"Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense."
Only [hella] games left until the end of Zito's contract.
Adoptive father of "Poncho" Villalona: This Angel don't fly. Nothing about him is light.

by thehavenot on May 4, 2009 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thehavenot comes through in the clutch

It was probably a stretch, but yeah that’s what I was going for. C/1B/DH. Or does the DH not count as a position? That’s a debate.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 4, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand that, but...

I would rather have a really good hitting 2B playing 157 games or so than a really good catcher playing in only 140 games or so. I think you can excel with a really good hitting 2B and platooning a couple of middle of the road catchers.

Just my preference. If everyone else has a sucky hitting catcher, and so do you, you’re not really losing much. :)

We don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. - Calvin

by solace on May 4, 2009 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But it’s easier to find a replacement level second baseman than a stud catcher. All this talk of moving Posey is honestly making me feel like we’re Padres fans or something. We have an unbelievably gifted and highly thought of catcher prospect and we’re talking about cramming him at another position just because we’re impatient to get that position filled and/or get him to the majors. That’s just nuts to me.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

fans showing a lack of patience? Who would’ve thought.

by tyrannoman on May 4, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

While I don’t advocate the 2B move, the split position thing is something I do want if Posey is as legit as we all hope.

The thing is, we have a potential stud (relative to our team of course) catcher already on the roster – Pablo. Obviously he’s not the most conventional of players, but his track record in the minors and majors has more than disproof scouts. Granted I never followed him much in the minors, but Sandoval’s looked great catching as a Giant. Who’s to say he can’t give us 30-50 games at catcher and the rest at 3B for a good amount of years?

Posey is supposed to be a super fast learner so would it really hamper him to slowly learn 3B over Spring Training (Pablo-ish) once he comes up as a catcher?

by SeeingStars on May 4, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fantasy leagues are the only places where Pablo is a stud catcher. He is considered by almost every MLB talent evaluator I’ve ever read to be a defensive liability and his weight as he ages will continue to be a concern. If it were just about hitting, sure, fine, let Pablo stick (or even significantly caddy) at C but it’s nuts to think of him as anything other than a good bat, mediocre-to-bad D, C. Posey is considered to be a plus defender and plus bat. Why in the world would you want to sacrifice that for bad D?

As for splitting positions, what is truly gained there? See Martin, Russell, 2008. It retards development and fatigues the player. Posey can be a potential All-Star at the catching position, with Gold Glove defense and above-average offense. Sticking him anywhere else is a waste of his talent, even if it is only 30-50 games a year, and sticking Pablo behind the plate in place of Posey for any more games than necessary is a waste of his use as well.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It keeps both bats in the lineup more often

When I prosposed this 3B/C platoon during the offseason, my main thinking was that a guy catching half the games and playing 3B half the games wouldn’t need all the off days a full-time catcher would need.

Getting both Buster’s and Pablo’s bats in the lineup as often as possible is something I would be a priority for whoever’s managing this team at that point.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But woudn’t the better solution be play Pablo at third every (or almost every) day and give Posey the usual days off here and there? I don’t know how it would be any easier on their bodies to play on days they were supposed to have off, just at another position. Again, I just keep thinking about Russell Martin in 2008. A 1B/C split I could see – it’s worked so far for Victor Martinez, but 3B is a physically demanding position and I can’t see it helping either guy to ping-pong between two of the more demanding positions on the field.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Baseball America had a writeup a while back where they thought Pablo had a chance to be a decent catcher defensively.

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I think I remember reading that, which is why I don’t freak out when he’s asked to caddy Zito. (And to be honest, I don’t think Pablo looks all that bad behind the plate anyway – he’s no Nick Hudley or Jason Varitek back there.) I just have a hard time envisioning there being a situation where any value is gained rotating Pablo behind the plate and Posey at third other than the odd situation where perhaps Posey has some sort of injury that wouldn’t preclude him from playing, but would preclude him from squatting. For me, I’d always want my guy in his top defensive position.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's my point..

How much credence do you put in talent evaluators on guys who obviously defy convention?

On the surface, Pablo is a fat guy who doesn’t walk and has no natural position.

How many scouts can accurately predict success for the Guerrero/Soriano/Francoeur/slap-happy hitters of the world? It’s just impossible to accurately gauge his future.. but presently Pablo is a 22 yr old, +.300 hitter in the majors. Maybe you see something in other players on our roster, but relative to our roster he is a stud bat. Yes you’re right league-wide he’s good to mediocre, but if you want to expand the viewpoint, then I guess ill take it one step further and say a team with this many shutdown starting pitchers doesn’t need much.

From a defensive perspective, all the negative reports about Pablo seemingly center around his size. http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=1724, I believe that’s the BA article being mentioned and again to reiterate the point, naysayers seemingly value opinion over facts. The pitchers working with him have given good feedback also so I’m not sure part about his catching abilities is lacking. The 3B experiment is of course a work in progress, but you can’t honestly be expecting more given the amount of time hes had, can you??

by SeeingStars on May 4, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t get me wrong, I love Pablo and am not knocking his bat at all. For our team and a lot of teams he has the potential to be a stud. What I am disagreeing with is the idea that he is a stud catcher (which includes both offense and defense) outside of the realm of fantasy baseball. He could be a serviceable catcher (and as I said in a previous post, probably better than some of the carcasses floating around out there at C) but he will likely – likely – never be a Gold Glove All-Star at the position. That is what a lot of people are projecting for Posey. Why wouldn’t you want to invest in that if you could?

I do not understand the need to shift players all over the field for the sake of switching, which is exactly what moving Posey would be. Pablo is fine at third, and if they determine over the course of a year that he can’t handle the hot corner he’ll be fine at first. Could Pablo catch for us? Sure, if there were no better options, however, Posey is – outside of Wieters – the best catching prospect in the game. Pablo at third, Posey behind the plate, someone via free agency or internally at 2B – what’s the problem there? What are the chances that the production we could get out of the 2B in this scenario would be better than any C we could get to replace Posey over the next five years if we switch him to 2B? That’s what seems to be missing in these thoughts. I for one don’t want to see Posey be an average to slightly above average 2B when I could see him be a great catcher.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you assume that Posey would be “an average to slightly above average 2B”?? He’s either a good hitter or he isn’t. I don’t see the incremental difference between “gold-glove catcher” and “sold defensive catcher” worth enough to shorten Posey’s career.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 5, 2009 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you assume that catching will significantly shorten his career, much less his career with the Giants? There’s zero guarantee he plays with us beyond his initial contract, so why not use a healthy catcher at his best position while we have him? I assume that he will be an average to slightly above average 2B because if he hits what most think he’ll hit – .280-.290/10-15HR – he’d be Kelly Johnson, and that’s exactly what Kelly Johnson is. Who would you rather have on your team: Kelly Johnson or Geovany Soto?

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 5, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe it is common knowledge that the rigors of catching are especially hard on a player’s knees, thus catchers’ careers are generally shorter than other players’ careers.

Kelly Johnson is a perfectly acceptable 2B, but don’t we all expect Buster Posey to be a MUCH better hitter than Johnson? I believe we think that Posey will be a Soto-like hitter, or better. Maybe more Mauer-like.

I also prefer to take a longer view of Posey’s career, rather than a more mercenary short-term view.

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 5, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well you’re right in regards to the rigors of catching. The thing is we aren’t looking out for Posey’s entire career, we’re mostly focused on the first 6 years of it, since we know he’ll be a Giant for those 6 years. Catching shouldn’t be a problem over that span, and if we extend his contract or buy out some of his free agent years or something and catching starts to take a toll, we can worry about that then and move him and he’ll likely still be productive. It’s foolish to be looking at this from the perspective of what he’ll be like 10 to 12 to 15 years down the road because frankly, the odds he’s still a Giant are slim.

I think calling our view a more mercenary short-term view is a mischaracterization, it’s not like we’re the Brewers last year with CC riding him as far as he can go over 1 year or anything.

Last year Kelly Johnson hit .287/.349/.446 with 12 HR’s. If you read a scouting report, that’s about what baseball people are projecting for Posey. Sure we HOPE he’s going to be better than that, but if your expectations are he’s going to be MUCH better than that, you’re far more optimstic than the people who actually know what they’re talking about. His good professional start is always a good sign, of course…

by Missing Barry on May 5, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is common knowledge, however, catchers typically break down in their early 30s, not their early 20s. If every plus catcher was moved in their early 20s because of a fear that they may one day break down, Mauer, McCann, Piazza, etc. never would have made the majors as catchers. If Posey starts to break down a la Mauer seems to be, then you consider moving him – not before. I think a long view of Posey’s career is that barring some unforeseen injury, he’ll catch well until his late-20s early 30s and then a move to 1B may be warranted.

As for his hitting, I don’t expect Posey to be a MUCH better hitter than Johnson. When drafted, Baseball Prospectus had Posey projected at .280/10-15HR. Just because he’s tearing up the Cal League doesn’t mean he’s going to be Mauer-esque. I don’t think I’ve read one talent evaluator who thinks that’s remotely possible.

Regarding hitting (2008):
Kelly Johnson: .287/.349/.446
Mark DeRosa: .285/.376/.481
Geovany Soto: .285/.364/.504

Soto is Johnson and DeRosa with slightly more power. That’s the thing about positional value; positions like catcher are so offensively shallow that similar numbers at 2B are considered middle-of-the-pack.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 5, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But again, why is it significant how Posey rates league-wide? Shouldn’t we only focus on Buster relative to our team?

I think the difference of opinion is by having different perspectives on the matter. You’re right in that moving him out of the catcher position ruins his value league-wide, but from my POV, that’s beside the point. Realistically, Posey at any position is an offensive upgrade on this team. That’s not to marginalize the Giants at all because our present and immediate future is centered around a very strong rotation. If we can get our best bat 40-50 more PAs a season, why wouldn’t we (if he can pick up the position)?

by SeeingStars on May 5, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oops messed up my italics =(.

by SeeingStars on May 5, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We’re looking at league wide value, because we’re not talking about what Posey can do for us tomorrow. We’re talking about Posey’s long-term value to the Giants, and that value comes from the league-wide availability of talent at the respective positions. Basically, there’s less of it at C, so the assumption is we’ll have an easier time filling the infield spot with a productive player than the C spot.

Your argument works if you’re looking very short-term at the Giants options, enough to limit the options to their organization, but any longer and the rest of the leagues talent becomes a factor in who the Giants are able to acquire.

by Missing Barry on May 5, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm, but I’m not advocating a switch to middle infield spot. My stance in this fanpost is from the Posey/Sandoval – C/3B split. Granted 3B is still demanding, but it’s nowhere near as punishing as C .

I still think that’s the better option vs. A) riding him for a full season and hope he survives or B) sitting him for 20 games and lose all those PAs.

by SeeingStars on May 5, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

With what kind of split in playing time? If it’s Posey 140 games at C and 15 at 3B, see Russell Martin’s 2008 stretch collapse. If a more even split, you’re choosing to play an inferior catcher at the position over someone who projects to be a Gold Glover. (And who knows what kind of fielder Posey would be; he’s obviously better at C, hence him being drafted and projected as a C.) Why go this route? Getting the bat in the lineup at the expensive of a) keeping important players fresh and b) defensive advantage seems backwards.

Also, at what point does a C/3B shuttle for Posey and Pablo hurt their respective development at either position, as well as their ability to work with the pitching staff?

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 5, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just don’t see the attachment to Posey at catcher. I understand your league-wide scarcity argument, although I consider the league-wide scarcity at 3B to be much more significant. And, personally, I’m much more willing to endure a defense-first catcher (with occasional power, we could hope) and a Posey at 3B than Posey at catcher and another Castillo Experiment at 3B.

Again, if we already had a stud 3B or 2B or even SS, I’d be happy to leave Posey at C. Truthfully, I don’t see Sandoval fitting in on a really good team – but as we are currently constituted, we’ve got to have his bat in the lineup. I see him as a catcher (yes, I know others disagree), so I think we should trade Molina in July for something useful (if we can do so) and make Pablo our catcher. I’d keep Posey in the minors this year and probably most of next year, and fill in at 3B with Richie or Rohlinger or Downs or even Frandsen (although I think Kevin should be our 2B right now).

Sergio Romo: striking out professional hitters since 2005. And winner of the 2012 NL Fireman of the Year Award!

by Lyle on May 6, 2009 6:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I’ve generally been disagreeing with everything you say, but I’m pretty much in agreement with this post. My assumption is in the long term we’ll have much better options than the Castillo experiment, which was obviously a disaster and in that specific situation we’d be better with Posey at 3B and another catcher. I think Sandoval may really be able to contribute at 3B, but I agree with you that his best role is at C. I also would like to trade Molina this season and move Pablo behind the dish for the remainder of the season (if nothing else to increase his trade value – just in case someone offers us a good trade). I also have no problem keeping Posey in the minors longer assuming Pablo’s playing C – it delays Posey’s free agency/arbitration/MLB service, which is good for the franchise. Do you think the Phillies really regret keeping Howard down in the minors as long as they did because they already had Thome?

by Missing Barry on May 6, 2009 7:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the Phillies had Thome at 1B and Howard was blocked. If Pablo is at 3B, Posey isn’t blocked. I’m all for holding off on arb-clock for some players, but unless something drastically changes in the NL West next year, it’s still theoretically weak and winnable. Do we keep Posey down for the sake of $ or do we bring him up to get the most out of the Lincecum/Cain 2010/2011/2012 years as possible?

I’d rather him come up in 2010 (if he’s ready) and have him learn the game so that by 2011 he’s done with the typical rookie growing pains. The Orioles are holding Wieters down in part because of $, but also because their core young starting pitching staff isn’t ready to be promoted and they’re trying to time that out better. Ours is (and will be w/ Bumgarner and Alderson up by 2011) so we should take advantage. Plus, if Posey is the real deal, we should have the dollars to lock him into a Longoria-style contract.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 6, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can’t really argue with your logic here. Honestly I would be ok with either bringing him up or leaving him down, as long as Pablo was catching in his place.

by Missing Barry on May 6, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

First, I don’t understand your scarcity argument for 3B – there are more 2B/3B out there available via trade or free agency who will put up same or better numbers than Posey-as-projected than there are catchers who will contribute even remotely on offense. That’s just a fact. Second, what is wrong with Posey at C and Sandoval at 3B? Pablo is hardly Castillo and unless his defense is off-the-charts bad by the end of the season he should be serviceable in the position defensively for 2010. The two combined should put up some nice numbers.

As for Pablo at catcher – I have no problem with trading Bengie by the deadline if we could get something of worth for him and then stick Sandoval behind the plate for a half year. However, I do not understand why you’d want Sandoval behind the plate in place of Posey in 2010 (if that’s what you’re arguing) if those are the available options because Posey is a better all-around catcher. Pablo might, might, be an average defensive catcher. Posey almost definitely will be a plus defensive catcher. I’d rather have a plus defensive catcher if given the choice and leave Pablo at third (or move him to first if the D is really bad). If you’re not arguing to have Pablo at C, then it just amazes me that you’d rather have Kelly Johnson (BP @ 2B/3B, etc.) and John Buck (replacement level C) than Kelly Johnson (replacement level 2B/3B) and Geovany Soto (Posey at C). Which pair is going to help win more games?

As for Sandoval, I personally think Pablo has a role on improving Giants teams unless he falls off a cliff or can be replaced with a much better option. He’s the best player on the team now with an OPS+ of 120; guarantee that’ll be better than any of the minors fodder you mentioned next year unless there is a massive talent breakout on the horizon for those guys. Pablo’s best position may be catcher, but Posey is projected to be better, so he should stick at C and combine with Pablo (playing 3B) for the best possible stats combo.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 6, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, meant to mention that 3B has been a relative black hole for the Twins since 2005, and they have resisted shifting Mauer to the position because they realize that the value of Mauer at a historically weak offensive position combined with a league-average (or thereabouts) 3B equalled a better chance for success than moving Mauer and pairing him with Mike Redmond. Decisions like these are why the Twins have winning records.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 6, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

it's not rocket surgery

3B hit better than catchers. Hell, SS hit better than Cs on average.

from 2008


Pos AB H XB BB SB CS EQR BA OBA SA EQA
 C 16922 4305 2258 1817 71 56 2055 0.254 0.327 0.388 0.252
 2B 18333 5047 2453 1796 399 135 2462 0.275 0.340 0.409 0.264
 3B 18064 4803 3108 2029 194 89 2584 0.266 0.340 0.438 0.270
 SS 18218 4937 2171 1626 409 154 2260 0.271 0.331 0.390 0.255

Let’s assume that a player who is, say 2 wins above average has the same value on the open market no matter what position he plays. If you have two catchers, and they are both 2 wins above average AS CATCHERS, then you really must trade one for some other position of need – for example for another 2 win player. Otherwise, you will get maximum ~3 wins when you should be able to get 4.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on May 6, 2009 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What irks me about this argument is that you’re taking pre-draft projections to be facts. Player development is not a straight path and things change all the time. By virtue of having a bad body, Sandoval was not projected to do well at catcher by all he’s done in his limited time is post one of the better caught stealing rates along with solid pitch-calling. Now I’m not saying Posey won’t develop into a Gold Glover, but it’s just way too early to tab him one seeing as how he still has major holes(passed balls).

by SeeingStars on May 6, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is mostly because the people that actually know something about scouting and make their info available to the public haven’t given us any real updates, so the pre-draft projections are what we have to go with. Unless you want to trust random bloggers with no credible knowledge on the subject to give quality scouting reports.

by Missing Barry on May 6, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right, player development is a crapshoot and pre-draft projections are just that – projections not production. However, almost every talent evaluator I’ve read has said that Buster Posey – at the time he was drafted – was a better defensive catcher than Pablo Sandoval is right now, and that is why they don’t write articles clamoring for the Giants to ‘do the right thing’ and put Pablo behind the dish and move Posey off position. I take these evaluation to mean something because those guys – Baseball Prospectus, Baseball America, Keith Law, etc. – see all the top C prospects and are in a position to compare.

If you are an ESPN Insider, Keith Law just posted a scouting video on Posey that raves about what a steal he is for the org. “Behind the plate he has an above average arm with good receiving skills, and he’s just working on his game calling.” He goes on to say in his article that Posey will advance quickly and could be ready for a Sept. call up. If there were significant holes in his defense evaluators would be much, much more conservative.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 6, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ohh No. I hope that didn’t come off as a slight on Posey. I do think the likelihood of him panning out is high. I’m just more or less saying that the talent evaluators drop the ball from time to time and thus far Sandoval is a poster boy for that.

by SeeingStars on May 6, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that just about everyone missed on how good Pablo has become. My argument is, all things being equal, Posey is the better all-around catcher prospect and so should catch. There’s nothing wrong with Pablo at third (yet, knock on wood), so let’s bundle these guys and get the most out of them by maximize our D in at least one position, you know?

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 6, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In 2008:

Dustin Pedroia hit .326/.376/.493 in 157 games with 726 PA
Joe Mauer hit .328/.413/.451 in 146 games with 633 PA

Based on fangraphs values, Pedroia had 29.5 runs with the bat, replacement level at 24.2, and a positional adjustment of 2.4 runs for a total of 56.1 runs above replacement. Joe Mauer had 27.5 runs with the bat, replacement level at 21.1, and a positional adjustment of 10.3 runs for a total of 58.9 runs above replacement. Defense was not included in this because there are still big issues with calculating a catchers defensive value. Based on fangraphs numbers, Mauer was more valuable by almost 3 runs (almost a third of a win) despite hitting slightly less well than Pedroia. Now, fangraphs isn’t the end all be all of statistics, and you may think their numbers are a little off, but I think it’s safe to conclude in less games Mauer was about equal to slightly above Pedroia’s value on offense.

Assuming Posey’s offensive numbers would remain the same whether he was at 2B or C, last year he would have had about 5 runs more value at C (based on replacement level + positional adjustment). Combine that with the fact that Posey profiles well as a defensive C, and I have yet to read a single scouting report that says anything about him being able to play middle infield, and this shows Posey in less games at C is more valuable than in more games at 2B.

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reply to myself

Just a correction I thought of after I posted: Mauer was actually probably a tiny bit better than Pedroia with the bat, just the PA is what put Pedroia ahead. Taking PA into account with Posey, you could probably take about 2 runs off the 5 runs I calculated, but he still ends up ahead offensively at C compared to 2B.

by Missing Barry on May 4, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

This is exactly why you don’t take an above-average catcher and stick him anywhere else on the field. Above-average catchers are so rare, to waste one is unbelievably short-sighted.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Counter-example: Craig Biggio. That worked out pretty well.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But that’s kind of a “Hey, Bill Gates never finished college, so why should I?” rationale.

Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...

by rotorueter on May 4, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the larger point is there are times when going against conventional wisdom does work.

I’m personally thankful right now that the team got creative and decided to see if Pablo could handle 3rd. If they’d thought like the naysayers here who predicted a disaster, they never would have tried it. I’m pretty certain we’d be below .500 if they didn’t take a chance with him.

That said, I still don’t like the idea of Buster at 2B

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If they’d thought like the naysayers here who predicted a disaster, they never would have tried it.

The jury is still out on Pablo’s defense at third base.

by xanthan on May 4, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lewis is LF makes Pablo look like Rolen!

by SeeingStars on May 4, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lewis is left field. We are all Pedro Feliz. Deep, man. Deep.

by chilibean_3 on May 4, 2009 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone remember why the Astros moved him? Was it just because they didn’t want to waste his speed? I remember him being pretty good behind the plate.

by Evan on May 4, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was about not killing his speed, I believe. They also tried him out as an outfielder in the early 90s.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It seemed dumb to me at the time, but obviously it worked out. Pretty gutsy move — has there ever been another catcher-to-2b switch at the major-league level? The two positions require such completely different skills.

by Evan on May 4, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There have been some guys who’ve made the switch to third (Todd Zeile, for example), but I can’t think of another who’s moved to second.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Side note

I was wondering who took over for Biggio at catcher – it was Eddie Taubenensee. He ended up being a pretty good hitting catcher himself, although obviously not in the same league as Biggio.

Also, if you look up Brad Ausmus on b-r, it’s sponsored by this page, which frightens me: http://www.thebossmus.com/

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, and they traded Kenny Lofton to get Taubensee. Oops.

by Evan on May 4, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Johnny Bench went from C to 3B near the end of his career.

Phil Nevin’s career included DH, LF, 3B, C, 1B & RF. Trying to detect a pattern to where he played is damn near impossible His year-by-year defensive positions is really all over the place.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Phil Nevin had one of the strangest careers in recent memory.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Defensive spectrum

Phil Nevin’s the only guy I can think of who moved to catcher after making the majors.

"[Greg] Vaughn is in a funk so deep, George Clinton wearing a miner's helmet couldn't find him."
- Jim Baker, ESPN.com, May 2002

by achiappanza on May 4, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think in his early days with the Padres, Santiago would have played any positions. He was wiry, had decent speed and cat-like quickness. No one whoever watched him throw out runners at 2nd from his knees would ever doubt his arm.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Santiago’s a good one. But that’s what’s so weird about the switch — a catcher has to have a strong arm, so why would you put them at second?

by Evan on May 4, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I seem to recall them wanting to get him in more games and keep his legs fresh. Biggio was a pretty small guy and I think I remember reading that they thought he wouldn’t hold up very long behuind the dish. It appears to have worked: In his first three full-time season as a catcher, he averaged 580 PAs a year. After moviing to 2B in 1992, it looks like (I’m eye-balling it) he averaged over 700 PAs a year for the rest of career.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Biggio = too small
Pablo = too fat
Mauer = too tall

It’s kind of amazing they can find anyone the right size to be a catcher.

Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.

by EliminateMe on May 4, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn’t it seem like a small guy would be the best bet as a catcher? The stress on his knees would be so much less than for someone like Pablo or Mauer.

by Evan on May 4, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think in Biggio’s case it was more his small frame than his height. I’m guessing he was maybe 5’10" and 170 lbs. He wouldn’t have survived too many collisions at the plate.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on May 4, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Short catchers are better, because they don’t have to stand up as far.” – Yogi Berra on whether Craig Biggio was too small to be a catcher.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The people above me have answered this pretty well, but Biggio is a once-in-a-lifetime type player and Hall of Famer. Not many guys like that. Also, a lot of people here are arguing not that Posey just move to 2B, but that he only move there for a year or two until he can move back to catcher, which is not what Biggio did. If we could guarantee that Posey could be anything close to Biggio v.2, then perhaps a move (weakening the C position in the process) would be something to consider, but otherwise it just seems like a panic move.

And one question that I don’t see being raised or even addressed is if we weren’t drafting Posey to play catcher, why did we draft him at all? His value – according to everyone, Baseball America, Baseball Prospectus, Keith Law, etc. – is that he was a plus defender behind the plate with above-average hitting for the catching position. If he is not a catcher (even in the short term) why not draft someone else, like Smoak? Seems to me that Posey was drafted for his positional strength, not just because he’s a good athlete, and so we should do everything in our power to keep him at the position he’s best suited to excel at.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree entirely, mind you. I think moving Posey is stupid and that Craig Biggio was a freak. I was just sayin’.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 4, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

:) Okey dokey.

Proud parent of future rookie of the year, Gerald Posey!

by GiantsFanInExile on May 4, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would feel comfortable if Gerald Posey played any of the up the middle defensive positions – C, SS, 2b or CF

by wilriv21 on May 5, 2009 11:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

TWSS

Stupid is as Ruben Rivera does...

by bkrhater on May 6, 2009 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about P?

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.

by jponry on May 6, 2009 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah

the brother can hit

by wilriv21 on May 6, 2009 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So can Carlos Zambrano.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.

by groug on May 6, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe Carlos Zambrano should be a catcher and Jackson Williams should toe the rubber.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that pie > cake, that Bochy is endowed by his creator with certain undeniable traits, that among these are veteran man-love, a gigantic skull, and the pursuit of the double switch.
Adopted Giant: Fred Lewis, who can still draw a walk.

by jcb9 on May 6, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can we get Carlos Zambrano?

by Natto on May 6, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Micah Owings has a career OPS of almost 900!

by SeeingStars on May 6, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I check with him next time he's mowing my lawn!

Fairley odd parent to Wendell
converting tools into skills since 2008...

by WTF on May 6, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Affeldt_small
McCovey Chronicles Christmas Cards
Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Candlestick_small
What This Giants Fan is Thankful For
Ralphie_small
Rank Your Giants Prospects
Img_3997_small
Brett Pill tearing up Venezuela...Bowker apparently scared of the country and going home
Small
Lincecum's Ks - A Very Basic Question on Judgement of Pitching Savvy
Small
Could the Giants get any Compensation Picks?
Shadow_grad_small
We're interested in Uggla...
Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S