2009 San Francisco Giants & Pedro Feliz
If Pedro Feliz were on this team he would be 3rd on this team in walks and BB% amongst our regulars.
Sad.
In truth, that speaks more to the adjustments Feliz has made this year (or more likely just flucuation that will not last throughout 160 games) than any further beriding of this offense (although it is in fact, as terrible as advertised. Probably the worst in the bigs).
If you told me that one day Feliz would have a .373 OBP, I'd have said Feliz must be hitting .340. Do you guys think Feliz is actually changing his approach, or do you believe you cannot teach an old dog new tricks? Now, I reaaaaally don't think it has anything to do with organizational philosophy (since I figure most big leaguers just do thing their way regardless) but it's an idea I'm sure some have floated around.
As for our offense, well, what really scares me is that when you look at our offense (tied for last in wOBA & 2nd to last in OPS is that we've done this with our players performing about as good as you could expect (possible exception of Renteria). Molina's avg is lower than most expected I'm sure, but he's also had a much higher HR rate than anyone could expect to help offset it. Plus, with a catcher of his age and skillset, it's a ticking time bomb waiting to expolode.
Fred Lewis, Randy Winn, Aaron Rowand are all producing about as well as you could expect. (Lewis is doing so with a .375 BABIP, so that's a tad scary). I'm sure Winn will be a tad more productive, but it's likely that Lewis and Rowand will regress a bit here on out.
Pablo - hard to tell what his ceiling is I guess, but he's exceeding most people's expectations I'm sure. What worries me with him is that guys as extremely hacktastic as him have started out well and generally crash as the league catches on (Francouer comes to mind, Feliz as well). That doesn't mean it will happen, but there is some cause for concern.
Ishikawa - really what could anyone expect here? He's done about as well as I think you could reasonably expect offensively.
Burris - he's been about as good as I think you could expect, but maybe I was just never that high on him.
I guess what I'm saying is, the players in this offense have more or less done about as well as you could reasonably expect and yet we have the worst offense in the league (and the majors as far as I'm concerned). My question is what did the Front Office really expect? I know this is a tam built around pitching, but surely no one shoots to be the worst offense in the league. Guys under perform collectively (i.e. San Diego last year w/ Bard, Greene, Iguchi) to have to do that. When your players do about as well as you could expect with little room for improvement (at least in the sense that those guys that could improve slightly are evened out by those due to regress slightly) what was the plan?
The logic? Did they just have unrealistic expectations for Sandoval, Burris, and Ishikawa? Did they think Rowand was going to bounce back to his career 2007 year?
I don't see how you could expect any better than this and in truth, I expected a tad worse. It's a good thing our guys can pitch
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
79 comments
Comments
to sum it up
I guess my point is that if your players are collectively performing about as well as you could reasonably expect and you are still the worst, what does that say about your planning?
It’s not like we’re the worst team because player’s are having surprisingly bad years or bad luck
by NeifiChicken on May 29, 2009 11:48 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't matter
This season doesn’t matter. In fact, the worse the Giants do, the higher their draft choice in what is expected to be a better 2010 draft than this year’s.
by sharksrog on May 31, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if pedro keeps his BB rate up for the whole year
I would hope that every single coach and manager throughout the Giants system from 1994 to 2007 never work in the baseball industry again. Yes, this includes pitching coaches.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
by zenbitz on May 29, 2009 11:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll look for the article.
But I think I’ve recently read that a sudden bump in walk rate can be a sign that the end is near.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on May 29, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take Pablo six days and Sunday
They’re both hacks, but at least Pablo has an approach. He takes outside pitches the other way and seems muh better at identifying pithes than Feli ever did. I also like that he’s a swith hitter.
There’s also their ages. Feliz was a Giant at ages 25-32. During that time, I saw zero ability to change his approach. Pablo is 22 and I think he’s already shown an ability to show some discrimination at the plate. Except for that craptastic period of April 5-16 where he looked way too aggressive, he’s been pretty good about making pitchers pitch to him. He’s NEVER going to draw a lot walks, but he’s a tough out and I like his chances of getting a hit against any pitcher.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on May 29, 2009 11:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not comparing the 2
Pablo is infinitely a better hitter. My Pedro comment was more in recognition of the offense as a whole and how Feliz is off to the best start (walkwise) he’s ever had.
However, with Pablo my bigger worry is Francouer, who had all that talent and more that Pablo has, but has clearly hit a wall due to hsi aggressiveness. Still, I’m not really that worried about Pablo, that’s not at all what this was about.
More that the Giants hitters have doen as well as we could expect and that’s STILL dead last. Just shows the poor planning by the front office
by NeifiChicken on May 29, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Francoeur vs. Sandoval
One huge difference you have to factor is the attitude they both carry. By several accounts from the Braves blog, Francoeur has shown little desire to change his approach and has blamed his struggles on the hitters behind him. Conversely, Sandoval has shown a willingness to hit anywhere in the lineup and play any position he’s told. The day PabIo throws teammates under the bus I will change my stance, otherwise I wouldn’t worry too much about his plate approach.
by SeeingStars on May 30, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus...
Pablo’s a big ol’ teddy bear that’s always happy and fun-loving.
And there’s something about those people that always seem to stay afloat in the majors.
Francoeur seems like a bummer… Or maybe that’s just because I hate the Braves.
by AmorVincitOmnia on Jun 1, 2009 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the obligatory
We are all Pedro Feliz.
by jctGamer on May 29, 2009 12:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
/lays off 0-2 breaking ball in the dirt
/surprises self
El Presidente Larry Baer's epitaph
"Nothing important ever happened without me."
by ResDog on May 29, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
/swings at 1-2 breaking ball in the dirt
/can change…but not that much
Meet my new son: Sundrendy Windster, coming soon to a minor league near you.
by EliminateMe on May 29, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
/Doesnt get it
Proud leader of the Lunatic Fringe breaking off from the Lunatic Fringe of McCovey Chronicles
by TexasRanger on May 29, 2009 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
/starts to realize then slowly nods head
In Mcc we have no names, but on trades or free agency leaves, we each get a name. His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz His name is Pedro Feliz
Proud leader of the Lunatic Fringe breaking off from the Lunatic Fringe of McCovey Chronicles
by TexasRanger on May 29, 2009 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They are all Pedro Feliz.
You are Pedro Feliz.
I am Pedro Feliz.
We are all Pedro Feliz.
emperor nobody: "can ben copeland play third will the mcgwire throwback jersey be sponsored by balco labs i think i am having non-nerve-damage related chest pains well there’s holliday’s homer for may"
Clayton Tanner. I have nothing witty to add.
by walkoff baltimore chop on May 29, 2009 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is an odd statement because the first rule of being Pedro Feliz is you don’t talk about being Pedro Feliz.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.
by groug on May 29, 2009 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the second rule
You DO NOT talk about being Pedro Feliz
The artist formerly known as Set-up man
by CB30 on May 29, 2009 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is this Feliz Club?
emperor nobody: "can ben copeland play third will the mcgwire throwback jersey be sponsored by balco labs i think i am having non-nerve-damage related chest pains well there’s holliday’s homer for may"
Clayton Tanner. I have nothing witty to add.
by walkoff baltimore chop on May 30, 2009 1:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes you need to hear it from another person and apparently Feliz has and now is accepting of it. He is also in a contract (option) year.
by wilriv21 on May 29, 2009 12:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
he was in a contract year in ‘07 as well and it didn’t help much.
You could be correct, but I’d still bet it’s just a mirage. He’s improved, but only slightly.
by NeifiChicken on May 29, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think the Giants felt that Dunn (especially) was worth the contract the Nats gave him. If, by their cost analysis, wasn’t worth it. Besides, we all wanted to see the kids play, and they are. It’s painful at times, but I don’t think it’s so bad. We all wanted a .500-ish year this season, with huge strides next year, right? Give Ishikawa a hundred or so more AB’s and we’ll see what’s happening.
I wouldn’t worry about the Giants trading Matt Cain for Matt Holliday or anything like that. Sabean came out and made his little speech for public consumption, but I really don’t see them adding a player who will be a FA at the end of the year.
oh, and don’t worry. Pedro will end up with very walks by the end of the year. SSS.
by tyrannoman on May 29, 2009 12:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If
If the Giants didn’t sign Adam Dunn and/or Manny Ramirez, there was little point in signing Edgar Renteria. Manny Burriss, Kevin Frandsen and Juan Uribe wouldn’t have been bad up the middle. Signing Adam Everett on the cheap ($1 million by the Tigers) would have been even better thus far.
by sharksrog on May 31, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you somewhat, but I still don’t view the Renterria signing as that bad. I don’t know if I could watch Adam Everett hit .230/.275 with 0 HR’s for an entire season (again). It’s also only a 2 year deal, which will give Crawford time to ascend (hopefully), and we don’t have to watch Juan Uribe play on a day to day basis.
by tyrannoman on May 31, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't care about seeing the kids play
I want to see good players succeed in a Giants uniform. Adam Dunn is a VERY good player. Cost analysis be damned, he is hitting .270 with 16 HR and 42 RBI this season, playing in a park comparable to Large Telephone Company Field.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
by RDreamer on Jun 1, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d rather them take Dunn’s salary for this year and spread it among draft picks over the next two years, so the Giants’ will be legit WS contenders for several years. I also believe that Dunn is a DH, and horrible defensivley in the OF, and I’m pretty sure at 1B as well. That, to me, makes him worth a lot less than the $$ the Nats are paying him.
by tyrannoman on Jun 1, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually I think they are already doing that
The Giants’ AAA team is pretty strong, even when Raptor Jesus is in SF. When Posey and MadBum get their shots we will be contenders.
It’s just that I look at this team and I think like all of us, who can we rely on to get a big hit? Maybe Bengie. Adam Dunn sports a better BA than most of our guys this year and he could have helped us, whatever the price may have been. He’s not going to upset the whole apple cart.
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. -Groucho Marx
by RDreamer on Jun 1, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do think he could’ve helped, but I don’t believe the cost was worth it this year. Were all the future all stars already in the bigs, and the Giants’ needed one more hitter, then I can see signing him.
by tyrannoman on Jun 1, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feliz has also cut way down on his strikeouts and increased his walks. It could be a statistical anomaly, but it could also represent a change in approach. But he’s also in a much better lineup, and he’s hitting 7th typically. There isn’t as much pressure on him to produce offensively and he’s probably hitting with a lot more guys on base than he did here. He’s also in a park where it pays off to go the opposite field more so than it does in SF, at least power-wise.
Anyway, I’m a believer in the change in approach theory regarding Feliz, at least until he regresses back to the brain dead slop hacking version. The reason being is that the Giants preach indiscriminate aggressive hacking, which as we all can see is a recipe for very inconsistent offense at best, particularly with a bunch of guys without top of the line skills. It took awhile, but the Phils seem to have done something to change the guy’s approach and it is showing up in the results.
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on May 29, 2009 12:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The reason being is that the Giants preach indiscriminate aggressive hacking, which as we all can see is a recipe for very inconsistent offense at best, particularly with a bunch of guys without top of the line skills.
It is also strange that Rowand was here for a few months then his bat "withered". I am not saying your right but it is interesting and there are 2 points of comparison.
Where is my beer & chili dog?
by daveinexile on May 31, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for the front office
I don’t like the “what were they thinking” line of reasoning. No one honestly thinks that they assembled this lineup with the idea that it would be a good one. They knew and we knew that it would struggle to score runs and lack power.
I’m sure there was some hope that Pablo was for real and that Burriss could maintain what he did last year over the course of a whole season. There was also some hope that Travis would perform as well. I really don’t think they’re surprised that the team is as bad as it is, though. They may have hoped it got better than expected performances, but we all did.
Anyway, there was little the team could have done in the offseason if it was going to have a budget it did. the team decided that it would be better to address the bullpen, add a starter and sign a shortstop as the best way to get the most bang for its buck. Given the budgetary limitations, it did about as well as it could have.
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on May 29, 2009 12:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
better than expected?
Really? How much better could anyone reasonably have expected things to turn out?
I for one am quite happy Rowand and Pablo have OPS’s over .800 (I didn’t expect us to have a single player do that, and it still might end up that way) with Lewis not far behind.
To me, there is never any excuse for getting the 1B production they have gotten.
by NeifiChicken on May 29, 2009 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, the excuse is
There wern’t any better options.
They apparently felt that neither Burrell or Dunn would have been worth it given the defense, and I’m comfortable taking their word on that. TI is performing maybe just a little worse than expectation, but he is coming around and I think has a decent chance to maintain a ~ .800 OPS level. I would be happy with that.
by FairweatherFan on May 29, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well I think I disagree with you in Ishii’s offensive abilities, if that were true than I would have no problems him at all. I think he’ll struggle to stay above .700 for the most part
by NeifiChicken on May 29, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you may be closer to right
I might be wish casting a little. I dunno
by FairweatherFan on May 29, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not necessarily reasonable
the point is that maybe they thought they might get lucky or catch lightning in a bottle with somebody…like Travis for example. I’m not say it was a gameplan or they were counting on it, but guys do sometimes outperform even reasonable expectations – they have career years. you don’t necessarily know when that will be.
As you say, Pablo and Rowand are at least meeting reasonable expectations, but not everybody is (particularly Travis) and i don’t see anyone having a career year.
The bottom line, though, is even taking all that into consideration, the offense still stinks, but no one is surprised by it. The Brass wasn’t thinking that it would be that good, but they probably did about the best they could given the restraints….not to say they aren’t responsible for the restraints…
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on May 29, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but guys do sometimes outperform even reasonable expectations
See: Pierre, Juan. Blake, Casey. Wolf, Randy..
awe fuck basically half the damn dodgers are having a career year. That’s the kind of thing that takes a decent team and turns them into a WS contender. That is/was probably the only credible chance the Giants had to make it to the playoffs this season, and it has yet to materialize.
by FairweatherFan on May 29, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and there is no question that they need more out of 1st base.
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on May 29, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And 2nd base
Hell, leave average production out of those two spots would do wonders for this team.
I have some hope that TI will get there, defense considered. Burris won’t.
by FairweatherFan on May 29, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This
I was under the assumption that the Giants were actually trying to give their younger players a chance to see if they could succeed at the ML level. An experiment which is still ongoing with the likes of Ishikawa, Burriss, and Pablo at 3b etc.
I swear they can never win. If they actually try to develop their players and give them an actual shot people bitch that they should have signed some mediocre FA older guy. If they get that mediocre FA old guy people bitch that they should have given some AAAA player a shot and go young.
by Hobbes2d on May 29, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as Pablo is concerned, I’m satisfied.
You’re right, people will bitch either way. I’m willing to give Duke Neukom’s “Giants Way” more of a chance as long as the team continues to improve. I think the current team will finish at .500 or better, so I’m still on board.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on May 29, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well said. If this team finishes around .500 I’ll be happy this season. Who knows, they may fall into a race for the Wildcard.
I didn’t expect the Dodgers to play this well. I knew they could hit, and I figured Broxton would be good at the back end of the bullpen, but that rotation is pitching so far above their heads it’s insane.
by tyrannoman on May 29, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with the first part, and for the second, I think the Doggers will find their level with a crappy patch soon enough. Not crappy enough or soon enough for the Giants to contend most likely, but still.
Duane Kuiper: Hall Of Fame broadcaster.
by Johnny Disaster on May 29, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
8.5 games games is a helluvalotta ground to make up. If the Giants can get like 4 or 5 games over .500 by the time they return from the upcoming 10-game road trip, I’ll start to think they have a chance at the Wildcard and/or division.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on May 30, 2009 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
my point is that playoff contention is gravey. I agree with everything you said.
by tyrannoman on May 30, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff contention
Playoff contention would have little chance of bearing fruit, and it would lessen the Giants’ 2010 draft pick. If the Giants can get a high pick for the fifth year in a row, they might REALLY make some hay considering that the past three years those high picks have resulted in Lincecum, Bumgarner and Posey. That could be three-sixths (which is fairly close to half) of an All-Star rotation.
by sharksrog on May 31, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Posey is gonna pitch every six days? He is awesome :)
BTW, I don’t know if the Giants’ would be that bad in the playoffs. Lincecum and Cain are two terrific weapons to have in a 5 game series.
by tyrannoman on May 31, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Toe the rubber in The City!
GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.
by groug on May 31, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fact is
The team, as a whole, is performing about as well offensively as one could expect.
And they are for the most part winning games. I think this is pretty much exactly what the FO planned and is based on what resources they had avaliable to them this offseason.
Molina Tanked about the same time Rowand got hot. Ishikawa has been getting it going while lewis has been struggling. Teams ebb and flow, and that is exactly what we see here. Sure, Rowand won’t keep up his current pace (well, he could keep up his current seasonal line, but still) but neither will Molina. The current team performance is about what we would have expected – the pitching is pretty good, and the team is about 500.
All pretty much seems part of the plan. If Anyone on the offense decides to have a career year or breakout, it could push the team into contention. We will have to wait and see.
We need a Juan Pierre.
by FairweatherFan on May 29, 2009 1:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we’ll see more from Renteria in the last 2/3 of the season and Ishi has certainly looked better as of late.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on May 29, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ishi has certainly looked better as of late
Because the Braves pitched him like morons. Throw him three curveballs down and in, and he’ll get himself out. This hasn’t changed.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Still with jokes. Now with updates.
by groug on May 29, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
“Throw him three curveballs down and in, and he’ll get himself out. This hasn’t changed.”
I doubt that happens to Ishikawa if he’s seeing the ball well.
If you notice any hot hitter, they tend to lay off their bad tendencies and wait for their pitch.
I actually distinctly remember seeing this happen with Ishi, and have been seeing it happen lately with Rowand.
by AmorVincitOmnia on Jun 1, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Until he proves he can handle the curve at his back foot, I believe what Groug stated is correct. We didn’t see the Braves attack this hole in Ish’s approach so It’s hard to say that he would lay off of it and wait for his pitch. Maybe I’ve just seen waaay too much of Ish taking his pitch and getting himself out.
Giant Dirtbags: John Bowker, Steve Hammond. MIA List: Todd Jennings, Brian Anderson
Wronghanded Affeldt pitches right
by Giant among Angels on Jun 1, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Juan Pierre
Juan Pierre has been great so far this season, but I don’t really think he would add that much. He hits for no power and draws no walks, so he relies on posting a very high average to make a significant contribution.
Juan has been a godsend for the Dodgers with Manny out, but history says he’s only a so-so player, since he is capable every year of making the most outs of anyone in the game if he plays on a regular basis.
by sharksrog on May 31, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point
Is we need someone to go Juan-pierre like and put up a totally unexpected and phenomenal line for a few months.
Like say, Renteria.
by FairweatherFan on Jun 1, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ever the optimist!
Judgment Day is coming
comics | art | Nattowear
by Natto on May 29, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Geniuses!!!!
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
If Dustin Pedroia played in Seattle, not many people would be talking about him.
by baetown415 on May 29, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brillant!!
On days I’ve had too much Kool Aid I say 80.
Where is my beer & chili dog?
by daveinexile on May 31, 2009 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cain for Feliz.
GIT R DUN, GIANST BRAZZ!!!
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
by JRPhillips on May 29, 2009 2:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Feliz is on my fantasy team
everyone loves to hear about my fantasy team.
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on May 29, 2009 3:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
/pulls out a recliner and a bowl of popcorn
Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...
by rotorueter on May 29, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True fantasy baseball story: I’m bad at it.
by xanthan on May 29, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And:
I
emperor nobody: "can ben copeland play third will the mcgwire throwback jersey be sponsored by balco labs i think i am having non-nerve-damage related chest pains well there’s holliday’s homer for may"
Clayton Tanner. I have nothing witty to add.
by walkoff baltimore chop on May 29, 2009 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it possible that with experience, the amount of power in that lineup and hitting lower in the order, Happy Pete has relaxed a bit and is just not pressing as much as usual?
Also, while you might say it would be unfair to expect more of them to this point in their careers, I don’t think Ishi and Burriss are performing to their full potential yet.
Duane Kuiper: Hall Of Fame broadcaster.
by Johnny Disaster on May 29, 2009 5:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
no.
not possible.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
by zenbitz on May 29, 2009 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not gonna jump on the Giants management here, because anyone who can pick pitchers like these guys can’t be all bad.
The fact of the matter is, we had last year’s Cy Young winner, Cain is and always has been a great, highly underrated pitcher, if Sanchez ever gets consistent he’ll be in Cy Young contention, and Bumgarner and Alderson are two of the best pitching prospects in the minors.
But you can’t have it all. We haven’t been good at picking hitters out of the draft, or signing them, and that’s why we aren’t contending. But we’re getting there; we got Villanola, and Posey, and Noonan, and Kiesnick, and Gillespie, and we’ll probably take a hitter this year too. It takes time to build a team, instead of buying one like the Yankees do every year.
The Giants front office has realized that pitching>hitting (see: Texas Rangers), but pitching+hitting=WS, and that’s why we aren’t going to compete this year. Few people expected these hitters to do very well, and if we’re getting what we expect out of our guys, when the highly touted guys make it, and if we get what we expect out of them, we should easily compete, and maybe make some headway into October.
by quincy0191 on May 29, 2009 10:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
so is this:
Beltre=Feliz
now kinda true?
Thing A
by sam23 on May 29, 2009 10:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Have you seen the Hardball Times article on Pedro?
Mentions the day he took four unintentional walks for the Phils. Funny.
"[Greg] Vaughn is in a funk so deep, George Clinton wearing a miner's helmet couldn't find him."
- Jim Baker, ESPN.com, May 2002
by achiappanza on May 29, 2009 11:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
WTF RU DOIN SAEBS Y DID U GET RID OF FELIZ AND MATT PALMER
Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...
by rotorueter on May 30, 2009 1:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
I always liked Feliz. he drove me crazy, but its hard to hate a guy who had 90 RBIs and 20 HRs a year. I would love someone like that on this team
The San Francisco Giants: Where old men go to die.
by GrahamCrakalaka on May 30, 2009 3:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Feliz-a-dad
Pedro Feliz is a GREAT guy and father to his kids. He merely makes too many outs.
by sharksrog on May 31, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
he does save a lot on D, however.
I do wonder if he could’ve been a good SS at the big league level. He seemed quite good when I moved him to SS after trading for A-Rod in MLB 2K3…
by tyrannoman on May 31, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feliz is an annoying ballplayer. He is not an annoying person.
Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...
by rotorueter on May 31, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frankly
I wouldn’t have really minded keeping feliz for a few more years.
by FairweatherFan on Jun 1, 2009 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
tough call
by FairweatherFan on Jun 1, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















