Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

doesnt make a ton of sense to me. thoughts?

almost 3 years ago 186644284_tiny sam23 59 comments 1 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

No, you’re right, it makes zero sense.

by xanthan on Mar 13, 2009 9:13 PM PDT reply actions  

It makes some sense

I mean, I like Steve Holm and all, but Ivan would be a better backup to Molina. If (and when) Molina get injured, Ivan would be a better guy to put out there for a few weeks. He also can play 1st base if needed and wouldn’t be a bad pinch hitter. As far as I know, his defense is still fairly good, especially if he’s only a part-timer.

Don’t overpay. Nothing more than $1M/1 year with some minor incentives, but it might be worth it.

Lastly, I’m thinking “Pudge meet Buster. Buster meet Pudge.” Couldn’t hurt, right?

Bonds stands alone.

Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal

by nostocksjustbonds on Mar 13, 2009 9:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Could he replace Holm and Aurilia’s roles? If so, that would allow them to carry 12 pitchers and still keep all the utility infielders them seem to want to keep.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Mar 14, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

The more I think about this, the more I kinda like this idea…provided he signs cheap so Bochy doesn’t feel obligated to play him too much.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Mar 14, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Word is Pudge is not a great mentor

That’s what kept coming up when it was suggested that the Red Sox sign Pudge instead of Varitek to be the veteran C who can groom the catching prospects. Related to that: Pudge isn’t keen about being a part-timer, though maybe the gratitude for having a job would mitigate that.
Finally— it was a small sample size, but Pudge was really bad for the Yankees in part-time duty last year (.219/.257/.323).

by ho-hum baby on Mar 15, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

If He Is Cheap Enough What Would Be So Bad About This?

I am not buying that the Giants are actually thinking about promising infield time as well as backup catcher time. However, if he is willing to be exclusively a backup catcher and willing to come cheap enough ($1M or less like Aurilia and Uribe) I have no problems with signing him to replace Steve Holm.

by giantsrainman on Mar 13, 2009 9:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Meh

I’d rather see Sandoval getting occasional time behind the plate (I’m skeptical of Posey being ready to start next season), and that seems more likely with Holm than a Former Allstar backup. But, whatever.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 13, 2009 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Sandoval is the starting 3B I doubt he will get any occasional time behind the plate

by FluLikeSymptoms on Mar 13, 2009 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

We'll see how long that lasts.

Before long, I think they’ll be looking for excuses both to move him off 3rd and to get Aurilia at bats.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

If by "hate"

you mean the knowledge borne from the experience of watching the Giants’ handling of defensively challenged rookies and Proven Veteran backups… no.

At least, not until there’s some more turnover among the decision makers.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Have you been unimpressed with his defense at 3B so far.

Last year and ST are still a small sample size, but he hasn’t embarrassed himself.

I think the only way Sandoval ends up behind the dish is if Benjie is traded or seriously injured.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Mar 14, 2009 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am also very much a non-believer in him playing 3B (I am also filled with hate), but when they move him from there, he is going to wind up at 1B.

by FluLikeSymptoms on Mar 14, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I hope not.

I don’t believe in his bat either, really. Not at 1b, anyway

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think 1B is only MLB position he is going to be able to play, so he better hit enough to stick there

by FluLikeSymptoms on Mar 14, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pudge could get games at first base and third base in San Francisco…

Pudge as a backup catcher, yes

Pudge as a third basemen, DO NOT WANT!

Baseball is a lot like life. The line drives are caught, the squibbles go for base hits. It's an unfair game. -Rod Kanehl

by j14 on Mar 13, 2009 9:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Doesn’t make the most sense, but if he’s signing purely as backup catcher then that’s fine. I really doubt that Sandoval is going to get any time there, when he’s not playing 3B he’ll be at 1B, and i’m not bothered by replacing Holm. Absolutely no interest in him playing 1B or 3B though, and we seem to have plenty of other options for those positions.

Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!

by GiantFan on Mar 14, 2009 1:27 AM PDT reply actions  

OTOH

Trading Molina might be a whole lot more palatable to the brass with an allstar replacement on staff.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 1:42 AM PDT reply actions  

  You usually want your backup catcher positioned squarely on the bench, ready to come in as necessary, so I am thinking pinch hitting with Pudge would not happen. And, since pinch running for your Starting catcher, Molina, seems to happen 3-4 times a week, I doubt Boulder Head will want Pudge out in the field and possibly unable to come in as a replacement catcher.

Proud supporter of the Fightin' Hydrants.

by Little Napoleon on Mar 14, 2009 4:29 AM PDT reply actions  

I think the fact that they’d have an emergency catcher in Sandoval would give Bochy more flexibilty in using a guy like Pudge.

If he’s starting at 1B against a tough righty and you need to PR for Benjie late in the game, Pudge could strap on the tools of ignorance and Ishi could come in for defense at 1B.

If Pudge has already PH and Benjie gets hurt, Pablo can finish the game behind the dish and Uribe, Frandsen or whoever can come in and man the hot corner.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Mar 14, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

but it’s more fun when the “emergency catcher” is someone like Pedro Feliz! C’mon wouldn’t you like to see hmmm… Randy Winn behind the plate some 18 inning game?

by Merope on Mar 14, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I read somewhere that Frandsen would be the emergency backup. Besides, everyone knows Winn is our emergency 3B!

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Mar 14, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

The phase “disaster quarterback” floated up from the recesses of my memory after reading all this… You know, the running back who threw 4 or 5 passes one year in a high school program that ran a lot of trick plays. The guy who comes in when all three real QB and the punter are mangled.

And I’m really tired of Winn blocking the JuggerNate.

Fred Lewis can stand under my umbrella.
31 May 2007, 21:38 EST - the last time Matteh's career W-L wasn't below.500
We are at war with Los Angeles. We have always been at war with Los Angeles.

by S.F. Giangst on Mar 14, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

I didn’t hear the game that Holm caught against the Angels a few days ago, but I followed on the cellphone and it seemed like the Angels were trying to steal a base on every pitch. Is Holm that bad back there, and if so, has it gotten around mlb? If so, then I can understand the interest in Pudge. I agree that Pudge makes sense as backup catcher, but I don’t want to see him around the infield, in anything other than an emergency situation like we saw in 2007 with Pedro Feliz behind the plate. Don’t forget that the Giants’ sat down with Rowand after the season and decided he burnt out and needs more days off, and if they decided a 31 year old centerfielder is playing too much, it would follow that they’ve made the same determination about a 34 year old catcher. Playing Pudge over Steve Holm twice a week makes alot of sense. And what if Bengie got hurt?

Brian Sabean: continuing to monitor the CC and Manny situations

by rxmeister on Mar 14, 2009 9:03 AM PDT reply actions  

Twice a week?

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Mar 14, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Must we all the catchers of the teams that beat us in the playoffs?

by Giant Voodoo on Mar 14, 2009 12:52 PM PDT reply actions  

No

We have to get the catchers from the ones we beat as well, see: Matheny.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t really understand all this 1B talk, let alone 3B talk. He’s played 7 games at 1B IN HIS CAREER. Sure it’s 1B, but it takes some quality to start at 1B, and the infield is a tough place. Not saying it’s tougher than C but it’s different.

The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."

by WalrusMan on Mar 14, 2009 3:05 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't think it's that hard for a catcher to transition to 1B, it happens all the time

I can’t think of a catcher who tried to make the transition and failed.

I think the real issue is that Holm may be a better hitter than Pudge at this point (which isn’t saying much, because Rodriguez has been really, really bad the last couple seasons).

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Piazza failed.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
Chatterbalks dot com: Now with updates!

by groug on Mar 14, 2009 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

HIs Arm Was His Only Limitation

He doesn’t need one at first. You have been shown to be dead wrong on this so how about just admitting it.

by giantsrainman on Mar 14, 2009 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

One example = dead wrong?

In baseball, only the umpire’s ruling are hard and fast, everything else has exceptions.

My original point, “I don’t think it’s that hard for a catcher to transition to 1B, it happens all the time” is hardly refuted by a single example, particularly of an old catcher on the downside of his career who was reticent to make the transition in the first place. “It’s not that hard” doesn’t mean is succeeds every time, it means failures are uncommon-to-rare. Also, “I can’t think of a catcher who tried to make the transition and failed” merely means that I can’t think of one off the top of my head, not that it’s never happened in the history of the game.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bench went to 3rd, Torre went to 3rd, Berra went to the outfield, and Piazza tried to go to first. Those guys were all studs. Any others? It seems to be a pretty short list of catchers who transitioned anywhere other than ph-dh after a long career.

by Sabertooth on Mar 14, 2009 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

We have JT Snow!!

isn’t that what we’re supposed to say when we move someone to first base? He will make Pudge a Gold Glover

Brian Sabean: continuing to monitor the CC and Manny situations

by rxmeister on Mar 14, 2009 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

There are guys who transitioned relatively early in their career, like Craig Biggio and Todd Zeile. If you reeeeeeally want to stretch things, Carlos Delgado was a catcher when he was first drafted.

I know Mike Ivie switched from catcher to first at some point in his career, but he was a little before my time so I don’t know how successful he was.

Never has a poster been more correct in the history of the internet. Ever! - ResDog on yours truly

by jcb9 on Mar 14, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t forget F-Rod!

by Sabertooth on Mar 15, 2009 7:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

One Example Is All You Said You Couldn't Think Of

Plus as pointed out below there just are not many who have gone from Catcher to 1B and played at 1B for a extendted period of time sucessfully. You are the one that is guilty of not providing any evidence to support your claims. The way you stated your claims only required one example to disprove them.

by giantsrainman on Mar 14, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well Sabertooth's Post Was Below When I Typed

But I should have remembered that my post would show up below his when it posted.

by giantsrainman on Mar 14, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I’d said “never,” it would require only on contrary example. I stopped well short of never.

As for example of catcher playing other positions, where should I start?

Piazza, though he didn’t stay there in the long run, played more games at 1B than I’d ever expect Pudge to have to play as a reserve. Biggio, of course, transferred to 2B, Mike Sweeney and Carlos Delgado both moved to first early in their careers. Victor Martinez and Russell Martin both do defensive doubt duty, as did Paul LoDuca when he could still hit/juice enough to justify it. Scott Hatteburg was (save one appearance at 3rd) exclusively a catcher for 8 years before joining the A’s and moving to 1B full time.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 14, 2009 8:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Your Statement Was
I don’t think it’s that hard for a catcher to transition to 1B. It happens all the time. I can’t think of a catcher who tried to make the transition and failed.

Proof has been provided that it is not hard at all to "think of a catcher who tried to make the transition and failed". Upon hearing this proof you didn’t acknowledge that you were mistaken but rather attempted to dismiss this proof. Bottom line, you were "Dead Wrong" on this support point for your position. It just is not hard at all to find an example of such failure.

Now, could you still be right in your positon that it is "not hard for a catcher to transition to 1B"? Sure, but you also have not even provided much evidence for your other support point "it happens all the time". Until I see some significant evidence here I am forced to think you are just trying to sell your opinion as if it was fact.

by giantsrainman on Mar 14, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

How was he mistaken? He said he couldn’t think of an example, not that it never happened.

..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.

by Cookyman on Mar 15, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Players transitioning from catcher to elsewhere early in their careers isn’t analogous to what you’re suggesting for I-Rod. In my example above I think even Torre is a stretch, he was mid-career when he went to 3rd. Old catchers who can’t hit are out of the game. Old catchers who can hit generally either remain catchers, like Fisk, or become pinch hitters, like Smokey Burgess.

by Sabertooth on Mar 15, 2009 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

ld catchers who can’t hit are out of the game. Old catchers who can hit generally either remain catchers, like Fisk, or become pinch hitters, like Smokey Burgess.

That’s a different issue. Like I wrote above, the problem with Pudge is that he can’t hit, so moving him around the infield is rather pointless.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Mar 15, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Piazza was really a catcher at one point?

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Mar 14, 2009 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Your Statement Was
I don’t think it’s that hard for a catcher to transition to 1B. It happens all the time. I can’t think of a catcher who tried to make the transition and failed.

Proof has been provided that it is not hard at all to “think of a catcher who tried to make the transition and failed”. Upon hearing this proof you didn’t acknowledge that you were mistaken but rather attempted to dismiss this proof. Bottom line, you were “Dead Wrong” on this support point for your position. It just is not hard at all to find an example of such failure.

Now, could you still be right in your positon that it is “not hard for a catcher to transition to 1B”? Sure, but you also have not even provided much evidence for your other support point “it happens all the time”. Until I see some significant evidence here I am forced to think you are just trying to sell your opinion as if it was fact.

by giantsrainman on Mar 14, 2009 9:58 PM PDT reply actions  

If the Giants want/need Pudge there is something wrong.
They should be all over NYY to get Swisher…who is younger, a far better defender at 1st and has more power, can take walks and is apparently a good teammate.
Surely trading some spare parts for Swisher is better than signing Pudge.
I just think Pudge wont make a good 1b and he reportedly was hated by the pitching staff in Detroit for being a bad game caller/receiver…which would take one of the Giants strengths and potentially cause disruption.
Just asking out of interest for you Giants fans…what do you think of the idea of trading Zito for an good offensive player on a bad contract?
I’m thinking Michael Young, Carlos Lee or maybe Alfonso Soriano?
OR
Trading Sanchez/Lowry for a player apporaching making big bucks on a small team…maybe Dan Uggla?

by Ohpityme on Mar 15, 2009 7:23 AM PDT reply actions  

"If the Giants want/need Pudge there is something wrong."

Pretty much this. The only rationale I see for this happening is if Molina gets traded for a decent third baseman and Pudge is backing up Sandocal behind the plate.

by Sabertooth on Mar 15, 2009 7:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Hmm an interesting point but I think that would be a sideways or very bad move…Molina is a pretty good veteran catcher to a mostly young pitching rotation.
Sandoval is a valued potential power hitting 3b whos young and cheap.

The Giants with Sandoval are set at 3rd its power at 1st and LF they need so imo trading Molina to put Sandoval at a position that will age him and sap his power is pointless.

by Ohpityme on Mar 15, 2009 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sandoval would have more value to us, and others, as a catcher than as a short-term 3rd baseman. I don’t believe Sandoval sticks at 3rd for the long haul.

by Sabertooth on Mar 15, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

If it's around $1 million

I’d rather have Pudge then Steve Holm. I don’t think Holm is even a decent major league back-up. He’s a minor league type.

by SFGuy on Mar 15, 2009 4:55 PM PDT reply actions  

This is an awesome idea

If Molina, Holm, Sandoval and Rodriguez all make the team, the Giants will have nearly half a ton of catching.

Proud member of the Adopt-a-Giant program (Aaron Rowand)

by antinous on Mar 16, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sp-giants21_ph_t_0501991449_part6_small
The McCovey Chronicles Fantasy League, For Money.
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
2012 Adoption Draft: Who's In?
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
2012 Adoption Draft: Rules Discussion
Honus_wagner4_small
Hector & Gregor's Excellent Adventure (In the VWL)
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List: The Results

Recent FanPosts

T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – College Left Handed Pitchers
Img_0100_small
Cormac McCarthy novel The Road
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – HS Left handed pitchers
Small
Angel Villalona reported to have a work visa
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – The Catchers
Hidey-fern_small
Hiking on the 18th?
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot - The Shortstops

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant Brisbee

Moderators

Minime_small Natto

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Goofus_small Goofus

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Det_7193_small jponry

Authors

09_small JT Jordan

Small steve S