Infield bat
I fear that Sabean and the gang may just go with the outfield that we currently have for 2010. Rowand wont be going anywhere, Nate/Bowker would seemingly have a corner spot, which leaves left to the super awesome, non-flawed Velez/Torres vrooom platoon that Bochy has spoken fondly of, for our leadoff spot.
I just cant see Sabean signing Chone Figgins or Johnny Damon, or going after Carl Crawford to be our leadoff hitter when he has it in his mind that because Velez is also fast, that he could do the same job those players could, for less money.
So... I think this means our only place left to add a starting bat would be the infield.
As of right now I struggle with a WISH LIST of what one infield bat I want to slip in to this sadly seemingly almost complete 2010 starting roster. So who would you guys/girls want? What one infielder would you like to add via FA or realistic trade? Theres no all around all-star Mark Teixeira type 1B out there in free agency, so what do you like about a certain player that hes your guy? What dont you like about another player that eliminates him? (Cost? Age? Bad defense? Injury prone? Kicks babies?) And so on..
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
95 comments
Comments
Branyan tree grows fast!
"The BB's are out. The BB's are being arseholes to me." - Brian Wilson.
by hairball on Nov 13, 2009 3:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If this is a penis joke
Please alert me to your newsletter so I can proceed with subscription information
Down in Front Meat!
by homerdrew415 on Nov 13, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
1. Uggla
2. Beltre
3. Johnson
dont really want the other 3
#1 threat to America: Pandas
Also, Tim Lincecum
Adopted Father: Tyler Graham
Official McPokeMaster
Registered Velezbian and supporter of Fredemption
by GrahamCrakalaka on Nov 13, 2009 3:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why the anti-LaRoche hatred?
Does this have anything to do with Lyndon LaRouche?
Down in Front Meat!
by homerdrew415 on Nov 13, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he’ll be very expensive compared to other players of similar talent (if lesser consistency). I also think that, as a lefty pull hitter with good-not-great pop and much of his offensive value tied to his power, he’d suffer badly at the hands of our home park.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 13, 2009 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
when you say expensive
what do you mean? I.E. 4 years 36 million expensive? I could deal with something in that neighborhood (I.E. less than rowand). And didn’t he put up good HR #‘s in ATL which is a pitcher’s park? I know I KNOW…DINGERZ!
Down in Front Meat!
by homerdrew415 on Nov 13, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I mostly mean length of contract.
Which becomes a bigger issue if LaRoche has trouble adjusting to a home park he can’t hit the ball out of, or if Sandoval loses the ability to play an acceptable 3B. Both of these eventualities are likely enough for me to shy away from offering LaRoche more than a 2-year deal, which would almost certainly prevent him from signing here.
Also, ATT isn’t a pitcher’s park at all, it’s just not a power hitter’s park. More specifically, it’s not a left-handed power hitt’er park. Becasue of ATT’s extremely irregular outfield wall, making direct comparisons between ATT and other parks based on a straight park effect is very misleading.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 13, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
In my previous comment
I was talking about ATL not ATT for pitcher’s park. I get what you’re saying though regarding ATT being a gap hitter’s shangrila (spelling?) but I don’t see why that would preclude a LaRoche signing. Look at it this way, if LaRoche doesn’t perform or Panda can’t keep it up at 3rd, doesn’t that mean we have a Lefthanded power hitting 1st basemen available to trade? Why is having a tradable 30 year old power hitter a bad thing? He won’t cost rowand or zito type money..I just don’t see the negatives that I see with everyone else on the list.
Down in Front Meat!
by homerdrew415 on Nov 13, 2009 4:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If LaRoche doesn’t perform, his value will drop, possibly to the point that he’s not even worth his salary on the trade market., and we won’t get anything for him. If Sandoval needs to play 1B, everyone in the elague will know that we have to trade LaRoche, and we won’t get full value.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 13, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A freshly signed free agent is untradeable almost by definition. The team that signed him obviously wanted him more than anyone else did.
by Evan on Nov 13, 2009 6:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fixed
A freshly signed free agent is untradeable almost by definition.
Officially disinterested in any outfielders from the state of Mississippi.
by Lyle on Nov 16, 2009 8:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which misses the point.
Becas\use I wasn’t talking about trading LaRoche immediately, but after next season.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 20, 2009 7:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are we certain LaRoche would fail at ATT
His small sample size might indicate that he would NOT have a problem at ATT (at least he might not be coming in the the stigma that he couldn’t succeed here):
AB 43
BA .395
OBP .460
SLG .767
OPS 1.227
HR 3
Sure, that’s a very small sample size, but looking at the stats a little further seems to reveal that he has not had problems in all pitchers’ parks. Career splits (scroll to the bottom).
Instead he’s had success in some and not in others. An OPS of .841 at Turner over 752 ABs is a strong showing. Turner is slightly less favorable to home runs than ATT. He also has good results in Petco (whoa), Miller, Citi and a strange line for Dodger Stadium.
I think there’s enough evidence to NOT jump to the conclusion that he would fail at ATT. In fact, I think there’s enough evidence that he MIGHT even benefit from playing here full-time.
This isn’t a case for getting LaRoche. I just think there needs to be little more analysis before determining that a player will fail because of our park. The Giants shouldn’t just pickup any power hitter when considering free-agents, but the right power hitter. In my estimation, that means right-handed power guys and lefties that have shown the ability to succeed in parks like ATT.
As far as LaRoche: I think decision to consider him should be based on the available alternatives as opposed to whether or not he could hit here – because it seems like he could.
-- Born Yesterday
by thatdog on Nov 14, 2009 5:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I stopped reading this after “AB 43”. Yes, it’s a small sample size. Yes, that makes his numbers almost entirely irrelevant.
by quincy0191 on Nov 14, 2009 2:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Once again
It has virtually nothing to do with “pitcher’s parks” and “hitter’s parks”. ATT is in fact fairly neutral, or even a hitter’s park. It has to do with the particular peculiarities of the ATT park outfield which have a particularly strong negative effect on left-handed power. Most park factors are not applied in a sufficiently nuanced fashion to account for this.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 14, 2009 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As far as I'm concerned, yes
NO, PEOPLE NEAR THE DOWNTOWN BERKELEY BART STATION, I DON’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT
GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.
by groug on Nov 13, 2009 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lulz
Please hit better, Randy Winn.
by oldjacket on Nov 13, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll take Uggla, but I prefer Johnson. (yes, I know, TWSS) I really can’t understand why the voting is so close when you have to trade for Uggla, and Johnson you can sign as a free agent. I might want Uggla more if they hadn’t signed Freddy Sanchez, but I’m afraid Uggla is going to be a butcher anywhere they move him. If it were up to me, I’d get both and put Uggla in left and hope nobody hit the ball to him.
No Edgar, it's not your fault, it's the fault of the idiot that plays you
by rxmeister on Nov 14, 2009 10:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The voting is close
Because Uggs is better and less injury prone.
Give -peace- Ryan Garko a chance.
by GiantPain on Nov 14, 2009 10:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I retract "better"
Their hitting stats are pretty similar, with Ugg’s better power numbers but Johnson’s better OBP.
But Uggla is younger, more consistent, and less injury prone to be sure.
Give -peace- Ryan Garko a chance.
by GiantPain on Nov 14, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but he’ll cost us something in a trade. That’s why Johnson is the clear cut choice in my mind.
No Edgar, it's not your fault, it's the fault of the idiot that plays you
by rxmeister on Nov 14, 2009 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously, it all depends on who we have to give up. But the Marlins are looking for cheap talent, they can’t afford Ugg’s salary. Who cares if we dump 3-4 of our AAAA guys, or maybe one of the ‘good’ prospects.
Then you can sign an OF FA instead of NJ.
Give -peace- Ryan Garko a chance.
by GiantPain on Nov 14, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Uggla’s 2010 salary will probably be around what Johnson gets.
by quincy0191 on Nov 14, 2009 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You think Johnson gets around $8 Mil/yr? I’d guess closer to the $6 Mil/yr that Franchez got, but I guess it’s possible.
Matt Cain: throwing complete game shutouts since 06'. No big deal.
by cain1rstballothof on Nov 14, 2009 5:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and if Johnson gets $8 Mil/yr then I definitely would rather have Uggla.
Matt Cain: throwing complete game shutouts since 06'. No big deal.
by cain1rstballothof on Nov 14, 2009 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s coming off a $5.5M/year deal. I don’t think it’ll be $8M, but 6 seems low; I pegged him at 2/14. Uggla’s going to get $7-9M. So they’ll be close.
by quincy0191 on Nov 14, 2009 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2/14 seems reasonable I guess. I’ll have Uggla please.
Matt Cain: throwing complete game shutouts since 06'. No big deal.
by cain1rstballothof on Nov 14, 2009 7:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the Marlins always get quality for their “salary dumps”
Please hit better, Randy Winn.
by oldjacket on Nov 14, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m here. I was surprised that Uggla was beating Johnson and am surprised that it is all that close.
You wish you were named Frederick Deshaun...
by dregarx on Nov 14, 2009 4:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The new infielder I would love to have would be Elvis Andrus. Do not know what the future holds for Brandon Crawford or Ehire Adrianza but believe Andrus soon will become a superstar
by wilriv21 on Nov 13, 2009 3:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Believe already established MLB player better than not-very-good AA prospects.
by xanthan on Nov 13, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Faith and reason can co-exist!
If you can get 3:2 on a headline of "Giants Pitcher Assaults General Manager" at some point this year, take it.
by esseffgeez on Nov 13, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You can dream all you want, but if you think the Giants’ can get Andrus then you’re not really getting the concept of what teams can do to improve themselves. The most valuable players in baseball are good young ballplayers. Teams control them for years and they don’t make a lot of money. They’re like gold. A team can only realistically expect to acquire free agents and players whose salaries have become too high for the team that owns them. Don’t worry though. When Andrus is 40, he’ll be on Sabean’s radar.
No Edgar, it's not your fault, it's the fault of the idiot that plays you
by rxmeister on Nov 14, 2009 10:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya good choice that would be awesome to have him
#1 threat to America: Pandas
Also, Tim Lincecum
Adopted Father: Tyler Graham
Official McPokeMaster
Registered Velezbian and supporter of Fredemption
by GrahamCrakalaka on Nov 13, 2009 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Beltre
Considering defense, health risks, and likely price.
Beltre and Cameron would be a surprisingly good, though certainly low-key, offseason. It’s probably the best scenario I can imagine that doesn’t involve Holliday (and possibly including those that do)
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 13, 2009 3:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Beltre and Cameron would probably thrill me as offseason pickups.
by xanthan on Nov 13, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You like getting…. defensive?
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
by baetown415 on Nov 13, 2009 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Me too. Or Cameron and Johnson.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"AT LAST I AM A PARENTS." - Buster
by jponry on Nov 13, 2009 3:48 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
am I nuts thinking that I’d prefer an Ishikawa/Garko platoon at 1B (with Pablo at 3B) over a Pablo at 1B/Beltre 3B combo? Then spend the $ that would’ve been thrown at Beltre on an OF.
by Goat on Nov 13, 2009 3:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Your not nuts at all, that seems reasonable, but I would prefer Beltre
#1 threat to America: Pandas
Also, Tim Lincecum
Adopted Father: Tyler Graham
Official McPokeMaster
Registered Velezbian and supporter of Fredemption
by GrahamCrakalaka on Nov 13, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you. I never liked Beltre, even when he was younger and better because even then he made way too much money. Now that he’s older you can really keep him. I think it’s much easier to find a good offensive first baseman than a good offensive third baseman, which is why I think having Pablo Sandoval at third is such a bonus. if you’re going to move him to first base, then the third baseman you acquire better be one of the elite third basemen in the game.
No Edgar, it's not your fault, it's the fault of the idiot that plays you
by rxmeister on Nov 14, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
+109
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There are a lot of teams needing 3rd base help. I think Beltre will cost more than Johnson. How much more might end up being a very good question.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 13, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, you’re probably right. I just hope that Beltre’s 2009 knocked his price down enough so that a smart team can take advantage.
by xanthan on Nov 13, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And maybe the Giants will too!
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
by Natto on Nov 13, 2009 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Phillies
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
by baetown415 on Nov 13, 2009 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Twins going into a new yard.
The Red Sox had been making noises about 3rd. And they origally got Lowel when he was viewed as damaged goods. I doubt the Tigers are spending but he would be better then Inge. The Halos have always seeemed relucant to start Woods at third … Any ways the list is not small.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 13, 2009 6:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And not a lot of third basemen available. I didn’t understand why everyone was saying “Beltre will be super cheap!” given his always-solid defense and reputation for being a good power hitter. Yeah, his 2009 sucked, but he has so many other things going for him.
by quincy0191 on Nov 13, 2009 11:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He could paint himself into corner with his agent and/or demands. He is a risky move and there are now fewer teams that can afford gamble $10MM for 3-5 years on the players that craps out and not have it bind up their rosters. I am not say it will play out this way but that the possibility is really there unlike most off seasons in recent memory.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 8:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OK I admit it. It was me.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
by Natto on Nov 14, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of mid-market teams and teams with not a lot of payroll flexibility are pursuing him (Twins, Phillies, Angels, Orioles, Mariners, etc), which seems to indicate they think he’ll be cheap, and MLBTR pointed to Joe Crede’s $2.5M deal last year as a baseline. I’ve heard the idea of Beltre being picked up by way too many teams for most people to think he’s going to get a big deal (which he will, comparatively).
by quincy0191 on Nov 14, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just don’t see Beltre as a good hitter. He had one amazing year, has never had an OPS+ over 120 in any other year, and doesn’t walk very much. Yeah, he’s a great defender, but he’s now 30 and likely will only decline offensively. Not on my wish list.
Joe Martinez: You are cool.
When it's all said and done, America will be remembered for three things: The Bill of Rights, jazz, and baseball.
by cornball on Nov 14, 2009 7:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It depends on how much you like UZR.
And whether you think Beltre will continue his poor 2009 or revert to his underrated 2006-2008.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 13, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
With depth needed at ALL infield positions and a dingerz hole in left...
Mark DeRosa. That flexibility would give us some roster spots to let the OF competition and bargain bin develop into the Spring.
by sanfranfreakshow on Nov 13, 2009 4:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Id go for a DeRosa
if only for the opprotunity to put a De in front of everything
Now batting DePablo DeSandoval~!
Down in Front Meat!
by homerdrew415 on Nov 13, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DeBork! Bork! Bork! DeBork!
Adopted brother of Jason Jarvis.
by j14 on Nov 13, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mark DeRosa is three things: expensive, old, and overrated. DNW.
by quincy0191 on Nov 13, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I belong in this line.
With him being able to play 3rd I just don’t see his price point dropping enough to intresting to us.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 13, 2009 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you just look at his game, singularly in a vacuum, of course you can say he’s overrated. He has an excellent added value in versatility enabling better production of an entire roster, both in the initial construction now, through this season, and onward as varying prospects finally plug holes.
It’s an important domino effect for a roster with many holes to be sorted out; I see it as being pretty crucial with our actually limited funds.
There’s no talk of him getting longer than 3 years, so what of his age? He’s more durable than most of the choices up there. I don’t see him getting more than 3 for 27. If more, I’m also DNW.
by sanfranfreakshow on Nov 13, 2009 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
9 million for someone we don't need?
coughrenteriacough
by sfoakbay on Nov 13, 2009 8:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Define don’t need.
/ Looks at Velez in LF then Garko/Ishikawa at first
He is not my first choice, nor my second , nor my third choice but if his wages drops to that level he his probably wanting a short contract and think you have to seriously consider it.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 8:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Strike that.
missed we were now on DeRosa. No thanks.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 8:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a deal like that. Besides, on a team with 2B, SS and 1B/3B filled, DeRosa either plays third (pushing Pablo’s value down) or the outfield. There are better, less expensive outfielders (Cameron) and better, less expensive first basemen (Johnson). I really don’t think we need the versatility (we’ve got a bunch of AAAA prospects who can fill gaps if necessary) and I really think he’s going to be expensive.
by quincy0191 on Nov 13, 2009 11:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
3 years for a player that is in decline, is redundant on a team with young, cheap players, and isn’t actually a good hitter? No. You, sir, are wrong.
Joe Martinez: You are cool.
When it's all said and done, America will be remembered for three things: The Bill of Rights, jazz, and baseball.
by cornball on Nov 14, 2009 7:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WRONG
Joe Martinez: You are cool.
When it's all said and done, America will be remembered for three things: The Bill of Rights, jazz, and baseball.
by cornball on Nov 14, 2009 7:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nick Johnson – He’ s my favorite in this department. Injury prone, yes, but that could make him fairy affordable and allow us to maybe pursue someone for the outfield. Unfortunately a signing like this also brings with it a Garko contract for a couple mil. Nick Johnson will most likely hit the DL and you want to not have too much of a stutter step when he does.
Dan Uggla – From what I hear he might be able to be had for a fair price, but I just hve no idea where to put him. Can’t put him at 3rd, we already signed a 2B in Franchez, and if you put him at 1B he would be fairly average. The only conceivable solutions I see is 3B Sanchez, 2B Uggla, and 1B Sandoval or even better 3B Sandoval, 2B Franchez, and 1B Uggla. Who cares if he can play 2B, the dude has pop get him in somewhere. Uggla in LF? Maybe, but sounds alot like Adam Dunn. All in all, His bat is very legit.
Russell Branyan – Had a career year and that makes me not want you because I think you are going to get too much money. Hasn’t played 300 AB’s in a year since 2002? Lefty power? Nah (unless the price is right)
Carlos Delgado – Old and declining. This signing has waste written all over it unless he’s a DH or a back-up.
Adrian Beltre – I like him because I think he could be had for decent value, then again his agent is Boras. He’s been injured but has great D, power. Risky sign but could be worth it if he performs how he did with the Dodgers in his contract year (and was hurt).
Adam LaRoche – Lefty power will die, not that I mind triples. I’d be okay with him but I think he might get a little too much than he’s worth and as pointed out before, his OBP is very BA driven so i’d feel better taking on Nick Johnson.
by Giant Voodoo on Nov 13, 2009 4:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you about Branyan
He seems like a trap to me
Grab Some Pine Meat!
by Gobroks on Nov 13, 2009 9:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Garko can catch
I just don’t know if he’s any good. If You sign Johnson, maybe Garko can catch and fill in at first – or take over if Johnson went down.
-- Born Yesterday
by thatdog on Nov 14, 2009 6:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He can catch
he’s just not a catcher. He hasn’t been a catcher in a long time and there is probably good reason for that. Normally people move from other positions in the majors to 1B, not the other way around.
It would be nice if Garko could, but he can’t.
by Giant Voodoo on Nov 14, 2009 9:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh. The Indians have had a lot of depth at catcher in recent years so teh play time just might have been taken by better catchers. I am not saying he should be a reguler there but it is possible his skills are better than the run of mill emergancy cather. Possibly even able to be brushed up to beinga 3rd string cather. That would be useful if our double switch king.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So what you are saying
is that he’s Pedro Feliz?
by Giant Voodoo on Nov 14, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he is us?
Give -peace- Ryan Garko a chance.
by GiantPain on Nov 14, 2009 10:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Robotic Movement? … check
Body looks like it is influenced by a Lazy Body? …check
Does he like cold adult beverages in his off time?…. I am too scared to finish the work!
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 10:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Garko can catch like Randy Winn can play 3rd.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
by Natto on Nov 14, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
uggla cause he’d hit a lot of DINGERZ in AT&T
by Tim LinCyYoung on Nov 13, 2009 7:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dan Uggla, but it doesn’t sound like he wants to move from 2B. If Sabean would let Franchez play 3B I’d take Uggla.
Matt Cain: throwing complete game shutouts since 06'. No big deal.
by cain1rstballothof on Nov 13, 2009 8:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
That is a lot of rescourse for little over all up grade.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
by daveinexile on Nov 14, 2009 9:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nick Johnson – WANTWANTWANTWANT. .401 career OBP? Yes plz. Former HR power that likely won’t rematerialize but may turn into doubles (or long flyouts…) in the expansive RF of Mays Field? Yes plz. Slightly risky, and therefore much less expensive? Yes plz. Not one of the big sexy free agent targets and therefore can possibly be acquired under the radar for an actually sensible deal? Yes plz.
Dan Uggla – Sure, if we can’t get Nicky. Perennial 30 HR power from the right side will probably be amplified in SF. Put him at 1B, or move Sanchez to 3B and Pablo to 1B. Maybe Sanchez feels some nostalgia for 2006 and hits .350. Weirder things have happened.
Past that, no thanks. Everyone else is either too expensive, too old, or not an upgrade over Garko. Unfortunately, Sabean never did learn the art of “you don’t have to make a move just because you can”. Hello, Mark DeRosa!
by quincy0191 on Nov 13, 2009 11:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
depending on the catcher situation, i think they will sign a LF/RF and an infield bat., with hopefully money left over for penny. i personally like the idea of acquiring uggla and putting him in LF, and signing johnson and platooning him with garko. let posey catch, maybe go after a 1 year pudge deal for mentoring, add penny to the rotation and i’m set. of course that all depends on uggla’s ability and desire to play the OF and what it would cost to get him.
by travis j bagdad on Nov 14, 2009 9:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
To modify a Wayne Gretsky quote to fit Nick Johnson:
You miss 100% of the swings you don’t take because you got a season-ending injury when your wife ticked you with a feather.
Give -peace- Ryan Garko a chance.
by GiantPain on Nov 14, 2009 9:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
n
You wish you were named Frederick Deshaun...
by dregarx on Nov 14, 2009 11:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Giants should consider trading for Carlos Pena. The Rays can’t afford him if they want to extend Crawford, and Pena has one more year on his contract. He plays great defense, and his OBP is always around .370 even though he K’s alot. He’s averaged 38 HRs a season the last three years
Panda 4 Prez
by KingChronic on Nov 14, 2009 5:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If he has one more year left on his contract, why not wait until next year and sign him in a draft class that will include Derrek Lee, and Lance Berkman (club option for an Astros team that’s not going to contend anytime soon) to depress Pena’s cost?
Not worth trading prospects for, IMO.
You wish you were named Frederick Deshaun...
by dregarx on Nov 14, 2009 5:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Werd
Matt Cain: throwing complete game shutouts since 06'. No big deal.
by cain1rstballothof on Nov 14, 2009 5:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Berkman says he’s going to retire after his current contract iirc
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"AT LAST I AM A PARENTS." - Buster
by jponry on Nov 14, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He was a good player.
Matt Cain: throwing complete game shutouts since 06'. No big deal.
by cain1rstballothof on Nov 14, 2009 7:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















