Changing the Giants' Organizational Philosophy
Sabean: I think that the problem is that we aren’t making productive outs.Bochy: Yeah. Maybe.
Sabean: Maybe I’ll ask Scooter in the quantative analysis department to help.
gets Scooter on the phone
Hey, Scooter? Remember when I told you to ‘cram that abacus up your ass’ and physically removed you from my office when you tried to show me ‘statistical evidence’? Yeah, sorry about that. My bad. I’ll pick up your latte next time. Anyways, I need to know if the Dodgers scored so much because they got runners over to third with grounders to second more than we did. Is that accurate?Scooter: No. No, it isn’t. Actually, you did better than the Dodgers when it came to productive outs as a whole, but you also did better advancing the runner to third with the first out of an inning. In fact, the Giants did better than the league average in that particular situation.
Sabean: Thanks. What about sacrifice bunts?
Scooter: Well, you had fewer than the Dodgers, but you were right at the league average. I should point out that the Reds led the league in both sacrifice attempts and success ratio, but they were just as bad as the Giants when it came to scoring runs.
Sabean: Wow. That isn’t how I remember it, but I guess I was wrong. Thanks for the information. So in your opinion, why did the 2009 Giants have trouble scoring runs?
Scooter: They had the worst on-base percentage in the league, and it was a pretty big gap between the Giants and the next worst team. That’s the biggest reason. By far.
Sabean: Okay, thanks.
hangs up
Nerd. But it sure sounds like he knows what he’s talking about. So, Bruce, I guess we should brainstorm as to how we can fix the team on-base percentage. If we were to acquire players with more patience, maybe it would have a domino effect on…
Why is this such a crazy dream? Why can’t this happen? Why is this a fictional exercise? Why? Why? Why?
How can people who control the fate of a multi-million business not have someone research if the Giants were really worse at situational hitting? How? How? How? I just did it on my lunch hour with the assistance of a free website.
You know, I’m still holding out hope that there really will be a change in organizational philosophy this offseason, and that all of the kerfluffle about "situational hitting" is just a smokescreen for the average fan. Nuts to all of you. I’m clinging onto that belief like it’s a lifejacket. It’s the only thing that makes sense, and I really need a world that makes sense. This offseason is going to be great. Just you watch.
335 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
SMASH
“How can people who control the fate of a multi-million business not have someone research if the Giants were really worse at situational hitting? How? How? How? I just did it on my lunch hour with the assistance of a free website.”
At this point Grant, it’s just flat out inexcusable.
Let me begin with an observation about the town I went to college in. Nestled in the Rocky Mountains, this town was usually about 1 1/2 years behind California with respect to pop culture, music and fashion. As a native Californian, it was obvious to me that folks were way behind the curve. It’s like they captured a glimpse of pop culture from a window in the past, and clung to that as the current state of things. Nothing you could say would change their world view. You couldn’t tell them “Hey, look – people are simply NOT pegging their jeans any more. We wear them the way God intended, and not pinned around our ankles.” It wouldn’t make a difference. They were convinced that pegged jeans were current style.
Why is this relevant? Because this reminds me of how the Giants evaluate free agent talent. They look at a guy’s production from 2007, and say “Hey, this guy hit .299 – let’s pay him as if he were a .300 hitter and lock him up for 3 years at $9 mil per year.” You could tell the front office “Yeah, maybe he had a good year in 2007, but for the last two years he’s hit closer to .260, with a .289 OBA.” “Nope,” says the front office, “You can’t make me look at the current production. I’m only going to look at 2007 performance and base all my decisions on that. It’s current to me.”
So your scenario can never work. Even if Sabean and Bochy decided to find patient hitters, they’d probably only look for hitters that were patient and/or productive in 2007 — guys that are obviously in decline now, but had that good year that one time.
Maybe this makes sense only in my head. But what it boils down to is this – even if, by some miracle, management were to actually determine what kinds of players were needed to improve this team’s offense, their ability to evaluate which players to sign sucks, because they seem to place a premium on a player’s performance from 2 or more seasons ago, not what current observations may show.
It's my blarg! Quick Pitch
And I tweet (more often than I blarg).
Except for the times when they place a premium on a players most recent 100 PA’s…
by Missing Barry on Oct 19, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions
tl;dr
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
I was actually gonna say that myself. It looked shorter in the comment box before I hit post.
It's my blarg! Quick Pitch
And I tweet (more often than I blarg).
/has ADD from watching football
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
Read it
good point. It doesn’t matter if they decide to change their strategy, because then they’ll just be going about their new strategy with the same amount of incompetence.
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
So where was it? Idaho Springs?
Still backing Notgardo, wheresoever he may wander. (Don't forget to wriiiite!)
by tk on Oct 19, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions
That sounded like a made up place, so I had to Google it.
Nope.
It's my blarg! Quick Pitch
And I tweet (more often than I blarg).
by can of corn on Oct 19, 2009 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Good post from my favorite Side Dish.
Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.
by Mayor of 311 on Oct 20, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Canned corn is gross.
Corn is delicious.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions
I am positive that can of corn is delicious.
WHY IS BOCOCK?!
by Lars The Wanderer on Oct 20, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Cannibalism is frowned upon in many parts of the world, you know.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
I don’t remember eating corn…
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past. - Missing Barry
My kids are always excited to make this discovery.
It's my blarg! Quick Pitch
And I tweet (more often than I blarg).
Hmmm….
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions
(pssst..... I wasn't speaking of actual corn)
Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.
by Mayor of 311 on Oct 20, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Imitation corn is even worse!
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I’d still like for them all to learn how to drop a bunt down. Mostly, just Aaron Rowand.
my cousin and i got noah lowry's autograph after he came out of a porta-potty. he was nice about it.
I think they should have the pitchers work on that.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 19, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions
You need to go take your rebel attitude and shove it.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 19, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Why waste time teaching them how to bunt...
When they haven’t learned how to hit adequately?
Fix the hitting first, it’s more important.
by AmorVincitOmnia on Oct 19, 2009 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe the Giants could work out some sort of arrangement with both the league and Hilerich and Bradsby to allow the Giants’ batters to use huge wooden bats the size of those goofy plastic ones. Then sit back and watch the hits roll in.
Ya know...ignorance really IS bliss.
Well - I do , anyway.
by victor frankenstein on Oct 19, 2009 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions
to allow the Giants’ batters to use huge wooden metal bats the size of those goofy plastic ones
by Missing Barry on Oct 19, 2009 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Hence the word “still.” Clearly, the hitting is crap, but if you’ve gonna square around to bunt and take the bat out of your hands, how bout laying one down instead of popping it up?
my cousin and i got noah lowry's autograph after he came out of a porta-potty. he was nice about it.
How about
not taking the bat out of their hands and get them to hit better.
by AmorVincitOmnia on Oct 24, 2009 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow! I had no idea Jim Davenport and Joey Amalfitano were still on the payroll.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Baseball Operations
I seriously wonder why these people are drawing paychecks. Not saying they definitely shouldn’t be, because I really don’t know what goes on in the Giants FO. Just saying I seriously wonder…
- Felipe Alou
- Tony Siegle
- Ron Schueler
- Joe Lefebvre
- Rick Down
- Matt Nerland
- Shun Kakazu (“Director of Japan Operations”) Tallying the numbers from the 2009 Media Guide, here are the numbers of players in the Giants farm system from the following countries:
1. Dominican Rebublic: 50
2. Venezuela: 17
3. Colombia: 5
4. Mexico: 2
5. Nicaragua: 2
6. Australia: 2
7. Canada: 2
8. Curacao: 2
9. JAPAN: 0 …So what exactly does Shun Kakazu do? What type of “operations” is he directing in Japan?
- Jack Hiatt
- Ron Perranoski
- Jim Davenport
- Joe Amalfitano
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
I imagine if we end up landing Yusei Kikuchi, you’ll feel differently.
Merkin Valdez? Manuel Mateo? A rose by any other name...
It’s Kakazu’s first year with the Giants, so it’s way too early to judge them on that right now.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
OK—my bad on that one. Sounds like he was hired to correct the lack of Japanese prospects in the Giants’ system.
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
AND DON’T YOU FORGET IT!
Still in despair.
"Use the stencil! Do it!"
konakona:「つかさに教われと...なんか非常に負けたような気がする。」
Shun Kakazu: MOAR JAPANESE PROSPECTS PLZ
by Zetsuboushita on Oct 20, 2009 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Well he hung out with the Rockies, Red Sox and Bobby Valentine……
So he’s he got that going for him. “Proven Winners”
by E Ticket on Oct 20, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Insanity
Sorry. The Managing Partner is happy with the status quote as evidenced by the two plus one contracts proffered to Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dumber.
And just when you thought they were relegated to the dustbin of former failures, these guys are still in place.
Special Assistant to the General Manager Felipe Alou
Senior Consultant, Player Personnel Jack Hiatt
Senior Consultant, Player Personnel Ron Perranoski
Special Assistant, Player Development Joe Amalfitano
Special Assistant, Player Development Jim Davenport
Senior Advisor, Player Personnel Joe Lefebvre
But to answer your question…yes the Giants have a guy who does stats.
Coordinator of Baseball Operations/Quantitative Analysis Yeshayah Goldfarb
He had a rather undistinguished career pitching occasionally for UCSD in the late 90s. I believe that was before they made the jump from Div III to Div II. Frankly I think he got hired because the Giants thought he was related to John Goldfarb
Don’t sweat it, Neukom has things well in hand. The new manual on the “Giants Way” lays it all out for everybody. A masterpiece. Lurie should have sold the Giants to Microsoft and spared us all those years of Bonds scandals and Dusty Baker play off appearances.
Anyway, the math is simple. 72 Wins in 2008 to 88 Wins in 2009. The Giants will win 103 games next year because:
They fixed the hole at hitting coach.
Edgar Renteria will have surgery and hit more Rbis and homeruns
Freddie Sanchez will be a “Four Time All Star” by this time next season
Sabeanmetrics indicate that Pablo Sandoval after OPSing 847 in 08 and 943 in 09 is penciled in for 1.039 for 2010
Sabean, fresh off his new contract deals Rowand back to the Phils straight up for Pedro Feliz And Shane Victorino.
He agrees to throw in Tim Lincecum and Brian Wilson rather than go to arbitration, saving countless millions.
Fuck man. I can’t wait for spring training.
by E Ticket on Oct 19, 2009 5:22 PM PDT reply actions
That’s interesting. I lived in the dorms at UCSD with Yeshayah Goldfarb. Obviously time to look him up on f-book and get to the bottom of this insanity….
"Matt Cain will save the children, but not the Dodger children" - I realize this is someone else's signature but I wanted to emphasize it because it is so damn genius on several levels at once.
by I own a Kayak and I'm not sure why now on Oct 19, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions
quantitative analysis, huh?
For the giants? Man, that guy’s job must be frustrating.
Adopted Giant: Henry Sosa
Knowing the Giants, it's probably qualitative analysis.
“Well, Bengie looked pretty sad, so we better DFA Posey!”
I would totally make that Rowand deal.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Oct 19, 2009 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m good friends with Yehshayah’s younger brother, and I think he does stat analysis for drafting/minor leagues, not so much in evaluating MLB talent. I’m not 100% on this though.
I wonder . . .
. . . what sort of analysis they use on minor-league stats. Do they have some sort of conversion algorithm, or do they use someone else’s figures, or do they just sort of by-gosh-and-by-golly it?
Professional baseball analyst since 1980.
I actually think "by gosh, by golly" would be a step up from the current practice,
which is to ignore it almost completely.
Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit... Maybe.
by Mayor of 311 on Oct 20, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions
They don't totally ignore minor league stats
They clearly pay close attention to batting average and RBIs in the last 100 at bats or so.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
Except for Velez.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
Major League III - Bill Neukom as Rachel Phelps
Rachel Phelps: I think he’ll fit right in with our team concept.
Charlie Donovan: That reminds me, I was going to ask you. What exactly is our team concept?
Board Member 1: I’ve never heard of half of these guys and the ones I do know are way past their prime.
Charlie Donovan: Most of these guys never had a prime.
Rachel Phelps: The fact is we lost our two best players to free agency. We haven’t won a pennant in over thirty-five years, we haven’t placed higher than fourth in the last fifteen. Obviously it’s time for some changes.
Board Member 2: This guy here is dead!
Rachel Phelps: Cross him off, then!
by E Ticket on Oct 20, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions
It's not about winning...
Well, it is for us… But, For them: Butts in seats. I have a feeling their goal is to fill the stadium as cheaply as possible.
Brian Sabean is akin to a treatable form of cancer... just get rid of it before it kills you
Are the two really mutually exclusive? The Giants had a longer “honeymoon period” at the new ballpark than anyone expected, particularly because a) they were winning, and later because b) Bonds was chasing the homer record.
And to counter the point about doing it as cheaply as possible, wouldn’t a cheaper way be to emulate the success of the Twins? You know, develop young players, promote them to the majors, supplement the team with veterans. The Giants formula has been to overpay for gritty FA veterans, trade pitching prospects for more gritty veteran hitters, and develop a few pitching prospects internally. That’s not really a cheap formula for filling seats.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
I have made this point before.
Even if they don’t care about winning a championship and only want to make a profit by putting a marginally competitive team on the field at a low price, they’re incompetent at that also.
It'd be cheaper to do this
but much harder.
The Giants remind me of the Warriors with more money.
Brian Sabean is akin to a treatable form of cancer... just get rid of it before it kills you
Semi-OT
Could our “Coordinator of Baseball Operations/Quantitative Analysis” have a more jewish name?
Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.
If Sabean had changed he would have traded for Nick Johnson.
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
Brian Was Correctly Not Interested In Two month Rentals.
You should of not been interested in this either.
by giantsrainman on Oct 19, 2009 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions
He is not more of a rental than Garko is, since he’s not likely to get more in the FA market than Garko will get in arbitration. Age isn’t a big issue since Garko is only two years younger. And Johnson is clearly better a hitter than Garko, and a better fielder too. Even with his injuries, he’s been much more valuable than Garko over the past few years – check out their WAR (which I know you like, and, as you know, is heavily based on playing time).
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
??????
You really think the Nats would have given up Nick Johnson for Scott Barnes?
Johnson Will Get At Least Diouble and Maybe Triple Waht Garko Gets In 2010.
Garko is likely to get an argbitration award closer to $2M then $3M while Johnson is likely to get a free agent contract closer to $6M then to $5M. Further, the Giants control what Ryan Garko does while they do not control what Nick Johnson does.
by giantsrainman on Oct 19, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
But we’re not interested in rentals, are we? Garko is here for three more years, and we’re talking bout a hypothetical long term contract with Johnson, so only talking about 2010 is misleading.
$5-6M for Johnson sounds reasonable, I guess. So he’d most likely agree to, say, $14M over three years, right?
$2M-$3M for Garko also sounds reasonable. But that’s just the first year – players get more with every year of arbitration. So, let’s say he gets $2.5M the first year, $3.5M the second, and $5M the third. I think you’ll agree that these are reasonable numbers. That adds up to $11M over three years.
So, by trading for Garko instead of Johnson, we saved an average of $1M (AKA what Rich Aurilia made this year) per year over each of the next three years. That’s close to meaningless.
Finally, the Giants only “control what Ryan Garko does” in the sense that they can choose whether or not to re-sign him in each of the next three years. I don’t see how this is relevant – the only way this is different from a normal 3-year contract is that the Giants can cut him if he really stinks, which you obviously don’t think is a reasonable possibility, since you see him as a long-term solution. And even that only applies if the Giants don’t sign him through his arbitration years, which they definitely should if they see him as a long term solution like you.
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
It Is A Good Thing Not A Bad Thing
that the Giants get to decide on Ryan Garko year to year while the would be committed to Johnson for multiple years assuming they were actually able to sign him. Further, the Gaints can still sign Johnson to replace Ishikawa in a platoon with Garko at 1B which would not be an option if they had traded for Johnson instead of Garko. Even if johnson was available in trade for Barnes (I very much doubt this) the Giants still made the right choice.
by giantsrainman on Oct 19, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions
- It Is A Good Thing Not A Bad Thing: not necessarily – if he has a great season next year, he’ll get a lot more money in 2011 than he would have had he signed contract (obviously it can also work the other way around). In any case, like I showed, there’s no reason to think that Garko is going to make significantly less money than Johnson.
- Johnson hits LHP just as well, if not better, than Garko (and is also a better fielder), so there’s no point in platooning them.
- Why do you “very much doubt” that they would have traded him for Barnes? How is Aaron Thompson superior to Barnes in any way?
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
We can still acquire Johnson or Garko if we want to though. If we’d trade for Johnson instead we’d be in exactly the same position with regards to Johnson but without the possibility of signing Garko.
I’m not saying that trading for Garko was better than trading for Johnson but the situations aren’t really the same.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
Going forward, Johnson is very much likely to be significantly better than Garko, at a similar price. Short-term, Johnson was also likely to be better. There’s no reason to believe that Barnes or a bullpen arm wouldn’t have gotten us Johnson. Therefore, the only reason anyone would have preferred trading for Garko rather than Johnson is that he or she thinks that Garko is as good or better than Johnson. Agree with me so far?
So Sabean thought that Garko is about as good or even better than Johnson. And now the only reasonable conclusion is that Sabean still drastically underrates walks, since that’s the only way someone could think that Garko is as good as Johnson. Conclusion: Sabean still drastically underrates walks, and there is no sign that he’s changed or improved in that regard .
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
Because the player that the Marlins sent Johnson was not rated as high or coveted as much as Scott Barnes was?
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
Interesting
This is how things went:
- You called Johnson a “rental.” I said that he’s likely to be better long-term than Garko. You didn’t disagree, but said that Johnson will be more expensive. So:
- I showed that the difference isn’t likely to be more than $1M a year, which is very little money in the baseball world. You, again, didn’t try to refute my claim, but rather abandoned the money issue, and claimed that Barnes wouldn’t have gotten us Johnson, and that now we can sign Jonson and platoon him with Garko. So:
- I meantioned that Barnes is better than the pitcher who was actually traded for Johnson, and that Johnson hits LHP as well as Garko, so you can’t platoon them. Once again, you didn’t try to refute either claim. You just gave up and made this pointless comment.
It’s not that there aren’t any counterarguments to be made, it’s that you’re not even trying to make them.
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
Never Abandoned Either The Rental Or Money Issues
Just found your claims “crazy talk” and still do.
by giantsrainman on Oct 21, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Well I’m not sure they will be the same price, Johnson is likely to get a higher valued contract (probably 1 year $6-7M compared to 1 year $2-3M). If you’re dealing with a longer term contract then it’s not the same as Garkos contract is non- guaranteed (on a year by year basis) and Johnson is questionable on a long-term deal.
Also, we’re still in the position to choose Johnson over Garko now if we choose. So we’re in no different a position than if we’d have traded for Johnson instead (aside from not having Garko as an option). And that’s why rentals aren’t as valuable, you can still sign them afterwards anyway.
Also, i think the assumption that we knew we could trade Barnes for Johnson instead is faulty. Firstly, whilst Barnes is probably a better prospect than the one they got there’s no guarantee that they feel the same. Secondly, they were made at different times, the rumour was that the Marlins wanted Sanchez for Johnson instead and part of the problem was that the Marlins overplayed their hand. Thirdly, the Johnson trade was made afterwards and so the Marlins had less leverage after we completed the Garko trade. It’s easy to look back in hindsight and say Barnes WOULD have fetched Johnson but there’s no guarantee that he would have and there’s not always the way of knowing that at the time.
And so no, i don’t think you can imply that Sabean thinks that Garko is the better player at all.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
Well I’m not sure they will be the same price, Johnson is likely to get a higher valued contract (probably 1 year $6-7M compared to 1 year $2-3M)
I didn’t say that they’ll be the same price. I said that Garko is likely to get $11M over his arbitration years, and that Johnson would probably sign for 3 years/$15M, so the difference should be pretty small.
If you’re dealing with a longer term contract then it’s not the same as Garkos contract is non-guaranteed (on a year by year basis) and Johnson is questionable on a long-term deal. And that’s why rentals aren’t as valuable, you can still sign them afterwards anyway.
Yes, the contracts are different, but that doesn’t mean the Garko one is better. That the contract is non-guaranteed just means that it’s riskier for both sides – if Garko does well we lose money, if he does poorly we save money. It could be good, could be bad. The only way it really gives us an advantage is if Garko does really poorly, in which case we can non-tender him. But if we think that there’s a reasonable chance it could happen, then that only makes the trade look worse.
I know that Johnson gets injured, but like I meantioned, even with the injuries, he’s been posting very good WARs over the past few years – averaging about two wins more than Garko.
And I think you’re forgetting that this trade was, more than anything, supposed to help us in 2009. It may look silly now, but we were contenders when we made the trade, and we desperately needed a 1B. Johnson was likely to be worth about a win more than Garko, and, for what was a contending team, that could have been very valuable.
Also, i think the assumption that we knew we could trade Barnes for Johnson instead is faulty. Firstly, whilst Barnes is probably a better prospect than the one they got there’s no guarantee that they feel the same.
True, I guess, but it’s definitely not unreasonable like GRM and SFG tried to make it sound.
Secondly, they were made at different times, the rumour was that the Marlins wanted Sanchez for Johnson instead and part of the problem was that the Marlins overplayed their hand. Thirdly, the Johnson trade was made afterwards and so the Marlins had less leverage after we completed the Garko trade. It’s easy to look back in hindsight and say Barnes WOULD have fetched Johnson but there’s no guarantee that he would have and there’s not always the way of knowing that at the time.
The Nationals never had any leverage – Johnson refused to negotiate an extension, and at the time he looked like he’ll be a type C, so letting him go would have gotten them no picks. They had to trade him. Furthermore, they couldn’t wait until after the deadline, because he would have definitely been claimed of waivers. The talk at the time was that they’ll trade him for a bullpen arm.
And so no, i don’t think you can imply that Sabean thinks that Garko is the better player at all.
Bill Ladson, the Nationals’ official beat writer, wrote after the trade:
Only the Giants, Marlins and Rangers had interest in Johnson.
The Rangers weren’t willing to give up anything significant for Johnson, so they were out of the picture immediately.
Johnson ranked third on the Giants’ wish list when it came to acquiring a first baseman. Ryan Garko was clearly San Francisco’s No. 1 choice.
The Marlins were the only team that showed any strong interest.
He’s got credibility, and he sounds very confident. And it fits with everything we know about Sabean. I just don’t see any reason not to believe it.
HA HA HA LOOK AT ME I'M ALL HAPPY AND STUFF NO REALLY CAN WE STOP WITH THE COOKYMAN IS SAD JOKES?
:-) :-) :-)
You should of not been interested in this either.
Holy Mother Of God.
Ya know...ignorance really IS bliss.
Well - I do , anyway.
by victor frankenstein on Oct 19, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Where's the grammar thread when we need it?
"The part of the roster where most of the money is spent, though, is on free agents and guys acquired through trade — guys Sabean did play a big role in acquiring. And they are not good. When you get 2/5 of a pitching rotation for free, you would think you could do better with $76 million than to field the league’s worst offense."
-Taliesin September, 2009
I For One Remain Cautiously Optomistic That Improving The Giants OBP Is Sabean's Primary Offseason Goal.
Brian in his own way has said as much multiple times with all his references to adding hitters with different personalities then the free swingers that the Giants are losing in free agency.
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past.
by Missing Barry on Oct 19, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
That’s not necessarily true… Ray Durham, Ryan Klesko, JT Snow, Jose Cruz Jr, Edgardo Alfonzo, and Kenny Lofton were all some players Sabean’s acquired that either had a respectable career OBP, or put up a decent one for us.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
When you’re around long enough, you’re bound to have some moves that satisfy any criteria…
Sabean is the longest tenured GM in baseball. The majority of his moves are moves someone would make who still values batting average and doesn’t fully understand the importance of taking a walk or successfully not making an out.
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
You are in a fog of Sabean bullshit. There is nothing in what he has done or what he says that would indicate that is what he is going to do. He did say that he might bring back Molina, so that is directly contradictory to your theory.
Why isn't Sabean held accountable for leading the Giants into many years of mediocrity???
I Guess Your Missed The Following Sabean Quote From His' And Bochy's Post Season Press Conference.
The team is going to have to take on a little different personality. As Boch pointed out to me at the end of the year, which makes sense, a lot of times when you have players like Pablo and Bengie who are free swingers, sometimes, especially with a younger team, or a team challenged to score a lot of runs, they’ll take on that personality. In a selfish way you’d like to find somebody who’s different from them who can calm things down or act in the middle of the order in a different way.
He said basicly the same thing in his post season letter to season ticket holders.
The next step will be to conduct a thorough evaluation to define our critical needs that will put us in a stronger position for 2010 and beyond. Most pressing will be to identify ways to improve our offensive production and on base percentage and to create a more consistent one through five line up.
But that is alright, you can continue to ignore these indications of positve change to come if that is what floats your boat.
by giantsrainman on Oct 19, 2009 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions
The problem is that Sabean’s actions speak louder than Sabean’s words. We have all seen what his actions have produced over the last 13 years. His words are largely bullshit. You can believe what you want. I choose to believe what I see.
Why isn't Sabean held accountable for leading the Giants into many years of mediocrity???
I Beleive That This Offseason Is Going To Prove You Wrong.
That said, I fully acknowledge the possibility that it is I that will be proven wrong.
by giantsrainman on Oct 19, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
How? There really isn’t much available.
by positiveuphemism on Oct 19, 2009 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Curious if Cabrera could be had from Detroit?
The right package could get him and he would look awfully nice hitting 4th.
Posey, Franchez, Sandoval, Cabrera, Rowand, Uribe, Etc… isn’t terrible. Obviously this is not what the lineup would look like, not enough Veteranwarriorgrittygamerness, but….This would probably hurt the staff since we deal from one of our only strengths. Sorry, just a farfetched day dream.
by MoreroidsforZito on Oct 19, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions
It’s great to see Sabean acknowledge the need to improve the team’s OBP, but what scares me is it’s going to lead him to sign another player in the 33-35 year old range and call it a victory.
I’d love for the prayers of the McCoven to be answered, but I’m afraid it’s not going to be.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
he said they’d try to improve our on base percentage and still talked about giving “due consideration” to bringing Molina back. he can be serious about one, but not both.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Oct 19, 2009 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Do You Really Expect Sabean To Disrespect Molina?
Brian, and for that matter no one in the Giants organization, is going to say that under no curcumstances will Molina be back. What Brian has said is that he does not see how this makes sense as Molina has every right to want a multiyear contract and a guaranteed starting job but he does not believe such a contract makes sense for the Giants.
Brian Sabean is being a clear as he can be that Bengie Molina is very unlikely to be part of the 2010 Giants.
by giantsrainman on Oct 19, 2009 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Plus, he probably feels that he owes Bengie something, and is showing 'interest' to create a market
hoping someone else will paying him more.
Or at least, making a pretence at doing so
That what I thought
create a market by showing interest so when you offer arbitration, he’s more likely to not accept.
by Giant Voodoo on Oct 20, 2009 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions
That’s how I read it as well.
"The part of the roster where most of the money is spent, though, is on free agents and guys acquired through trade — guys Sabean did play a big role in acquiring. And they are not good. When you get 2/5 of a pitching rotation for free, you would think you could do better with $76 million than to field the league’s worst offense."
-Taliesin September, 2009
Something weird is going on here...
Rainman makes a whole lot of sense.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
it isn't disrespect
well, maybe to the hypersensitive Bengie it is, but he could have said something like “we’ll evaluate all options” but he specifically said that bringing Bengie back is on the table. It’s doubtful that anything Sabean says will create a 2-year deal market for Bengie. he simply isn’t worth it at any price b/c he thinks he still starter and he’s horrible. In any event, it’s anything but “clear” that Bengie won’t be back.
I hope you’re right and that Sabean’s just blowing smoke, but I believe that the Giants will not offer him arbitration (what if he accepted!?!?) and he’ll test the free agent market trying to get a 2-year deal. When he doesn’t find that market, he’ll come crawling back and the stupid Giants will sign him to a 1-year deal at about the same money as he made this year. This situation, of course, will not improve the team’s biggest weakness – (not) getting on base and will delay the development of Buster Posey.
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Oct 20, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I Think Bengie Will Have No Problem Getting A Two Year Deal for At Least $10M.
My view is that there is no realistic change that Bengie will be a Giant in 2010.
by giantsrainman on Oct 20, 2009 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions
You are in a fog of Sabean bullshit.
I’m pretty sure that’s what it’s like to drive through Coalinga.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 19, 2009 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Brian also says he “kick tires”.
Do you think he actually goes to the parking lot, whenever he makes a trade or FA offer and kicks the tires of his car while contemplating the deal?
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 7:14 AM PDT up reply actions
This offseason is the perfect storm for me
1) I can now hang with the sabermaticians: I am not going to develop any new analysis tool, nor am I going to spend hours mulling over Pitch/Fx data. I get the big picture. And I understand this stuff well enough now to follow conversations and comment on said conversations. My knowledge in advanced baseball statistics is far greater than it was this time a year ago. (Thanks Fangraphs!)
2) Following point #1: I understand why the Giants have a terrible offense. I can use numerous free websites to evaluate their “talent”. I understand where the Giants need to go from here.
3) Using my freely acquired knowledge, I have made the determination that the Giants do not have the correct leadership. Their decision-makers are administering a baseball team as if it were 1975 or 1985 (which era had the most suck?) They lack any curiosity, refuse to admit that they have faults and rectify those faults – thus they refuse to grow as professionals (This is one of the key moments in Moneyball. People always say it is a baseball book, but it’s a management book. It is a book about stepping outside of your dogma and trying to find the true value in something using analysis, not hearsay. A key moment is when Billy Bean begins to understand that playing baseball for X number of years did not teach him what really won baseball games. He admitted his deficiency, learned, and shifted the paradigm forever, except for Brian Sabean.)
4) Even if the Giants had quality management, they don’t have the money, nor the depth of talent on the free-agent market, nor the depth of talent on their own roster (major and minor) to make trades that would significantly increase the ability of the offense to score runs without hampering one of the positive elements of the team (pitching, defense).
5) The Giants financial situation (see point #4) is the result of the Giants not being able to evaluate talent properly (see point #3). This will remain to some degree for a few years while Rowand and Jermain Dye (see point #3 – you know it’s going to happen) suck up the payroll, and Zito provides average pitching for superstar money. All the while, we waste a once in a generation pitching staff.
6) The Giants offense is terrible and it really can’t get any better.
7) I understand 1-7. Brian Sabean does not.
One conclusion to be drawn from this: I am now too educated about baseball and can’t do anything about it. Normally in the workplace for example, I could show my stuff and explain why the old, tired ways are no good anymore. But alas, all I can do is complain on this Pie blog. If I thought the Giants just needed to improve their situational hitting to make a better offense, I could feel better knowing (falsely) that things really could get better.
So, this offseason and coming season are going to be real tough. I have matured as a fan, but my team hasn’t followed my progression. I don’t know what to do about it except holler, scream, and catharticly write crap like this with no hope of things changing in the near future.
Well, as much as it sucks, I’m glad you are all here with me. The sun is shinning here on the deck of the Titanic.
VROOM!!!
/auto-defenestrates
something something jhiat00 will swindle
Young Studs for Old Bats: The Brian Sabean Story
FREE KEVIN FRANDSEN!!! Member of the Frandsen 5% Club.
by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Oct 19, 2009 6:14 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Long post is long.
But I saw a mention of pie. PIE!
Um, no.
A key moment is when Billy Bean begins to understand that playing baseball for X number of years did not teach him what really won baseball games.
No, or at least only a secondarily “key” moment. (Incidentally, that man is Billy Beane, not to be confused with another former ballplayer, Billy Bean.)
The “key moment” was when Sandy Alderson, Beane’s predecessor and one-time boss, realized—years before Beane was even AGM—that there were newer, better ways of evaluating player talent. Trust me, I know.
(There was a recent two-part article in Deadspin on this topic.)
Professional baseball analyst since 1980.
You make it sound like Alderson sought you out or something….
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
Oh I didn’t realize you linked to that article until after I posted the comment. Whoops.
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
I understand that Billy Beane (thanks for the correction, I can never remember how to spell it correctly – lazy), did not originate these analysis. A realization still has to take place in Beane’s mind, whether or not he originated the ideas. If my memory is correct, the things that Alderson imparted onto Beane were originally from Bill James’ books, or knowing him personally – I’m sure that Alderson had a realization as well. It’s been a while since I read the book and I haven’t read the Deadspin article yet, so I apologize if I have my facts muddled. One way or the other, Beane had to set aside what he knew, thus admitting that he was deficient in an area that he thought he knew a whole lot about, and learn a new way. This is something that Brian Sabean just doesn’t seem to have the makeup for.
/auto-defenestrates
something something jhiat00 will swindle
Young Studs for Old Bats: The Brian Sabean Story
FREE KEVIN FRANDSEN!!! Member of the Frandsen 5% Club.
by Uribe nee Gonzalez on Oct 20, 2009 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions
I think in Moneyball, Alderson first gives Beane a pamphlet or something from Eric Walker, then gives him the abstracts. I’m not sure though, I’ve given away both of my copies of that book.
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
Hell is UZR people
that’s all you need to know
I believe this summarizes much of my position as well. I fully expect to be retired before the Giants reach the World Series again.
"The part of the roster where most of the money is spent, though, is on free agents and guys acquired through trade — guys Sabean did play a big role in acquiring. And they are not good. When you get 2/5 of a pitching rotation for free, you would think you could do better with $76 million than to field the league’s worst offense."
-Taliesin September, 2009
You expect to be able to retire? Phhhhhttt! Now who’s being naive, Lyle? :)
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Giants? World Series?
Hhahahahaa
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
Yeah, the problem is I don’t see many 60+ tv directors. I think I need to get into your end of the business…
"The part of the roster where most of the money is spent, though, is on free agents and guys acquired through trade — guys Sabean did play a big role in acquiring. And they are not good. When you get 2/5 of a pitching rotation for free, you would think you could do better with $76 million than to field the league’s worst offense."
-Taliesin September, 2009
Ignorance is bliss.
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past. - Missing Barry
That would be an interesting attempt. What did you say?
"The part of the roster where most of the money is spent, though, is on free agents and guys acquired through trade — guys Sabean did play a big role in acquiring. And they are not good. When you get 2/5 of a pitching rotation for free, you would think you could do better with $76 million than to field the league’s worst offense."
-Taliesin September, 2009
sadly
you can’t steal first
(except when you strike out on a ball in the dirt)
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
I think somebody should just try running to first as the pitcher goes into his windup. Just to see what happens.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
I think
if you can make it to first before the throw gets home, you should get the base
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
Man, that cat just never gets tired.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 19, 2009 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Let's let Goldfarb do a quantitative analysis of that.
Ya know...ignorance really IS bliss.
Well - I do , anyway.
by victor frankenstein on Oct 19, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions
AGGGH! I wanted to know if she ever made it to the top
Giant Dirtbags: John Bowker, Steve Hammond. MIA List: Todd Jennings, Brian Anderson
Jeremy Affeldt induces DP's
by Giant among Angels on Oct 19, 2009 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions
Because fuck this team, that's why
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
It's almost like Sabean is playing Rotisserie instead of Head-to-Head.
Once he signed Bengie he realized he couldn’t compete in the OBP so he just decided to punt (give up on) that stat. Actually, this explanation is one of the more likely I’ve heard given the very bizarre situation that is the Giants offense.
chilibean_3 says: Cybermaldonado, "I don’t think you understand anything. Anything at all." Stay classy chilibean my friend.
so which stat category did he think was going to carry him?
AVG? no
HR? no
RBI? no
Steals? no
Walks? no
ooooh – pitching – got it.
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
Dominating pitching is how I consistently come in 5th or worse in all of my fantasy baseball leagues.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm still bitter about my FB experience
my team was miles ahead of the rest of the league all season. We should have done roto- I would have laid waste to the others.
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
by bondslegend on Oct 20, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Well, I’ll probably start another league next year, and I always do roto. You just have to join before 13 other people do.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
Will definitely do that
loved playing this year and did super well in both my leagues. I’d love to do a roto auction if anyone wants to get super nerdy
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
Much like real life baseball, it’s all a matter of who’s hot in the playoffs. I was HOT THAT WEEK BABY!
"It's too late now."
BULLSHIT
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
GRRRRR RAGE
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
Actually
I did the same thing in my fantasy football playoffs last year (got hot and beat the best team), so it all depends. Still sucks though
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
/sigh
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
by WilliamVanLandingham on Oct 19, 2009 6:42 PM PDT reply actions
leopards and spots, etc
Neal before Zod!
Official Sponsor of the 1997 San Francisco Giants
by nostocksjustbonds on Oct 19, 2009 7:05 PM PDT reply actions
How can people who control the fate of a multi-million business not have someone research if the Giants were really worse at situational hitting?
Because the Giants know that profits are a result of being “in it” rather than “winning it”.
There's something else going on here too
Sabean’s bad deals in the past notwithstanding, this team just doesn’t spend enough money.
There is no way we will be a competitive team next year at our current payroll. We won’t be able to win the west or the wildcard with 80 million, much less survive against the 100-200million teams that we’ll run up against in the playoffs.
I really wish Neukom would just come out and say that this team is too good and has too much potential to waste because you didn’t want to bump payroll up to 100 million to make us competitive.
Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.
This team spends plenty of money.
It just doesn’t do it wisely.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
But there's nothing we can do about past bad deals now
And the only way we’re going to significantly improve next year is expanding the payroll. We don’t have enough money to sign any of the players we would need/want to sign.
Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.
I think there is at least one thing the team can do about this. That is not throw good money after bad – IE Avoid similar contracts. I am including the 3 year contracts to veteran scrubs. In fact the Giants paid more last season and got less production there (waste for lack of a better term) then in the Big Contracts cataglory to Rowand & Zito.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
Well sure
Obviously I’m not advocating throwing money away. But how will we get the players we need at our current payroll levels? It will have to be expanded, and not just by a little.
Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.
I’m more than a little confused by what the payroll limitations are at this point. They’ve never used any of the added revenue that the Comcast deal gave them (that is the payroll stayed fairly flat after that) but they’ve noted on a few occassions that this was because of baseball decisions (following the philosphy of trying to build from within) and not bottom line restrictions. Remember last winter/spring Sabean made the big announcement that they felt some teams were going to have to jettison high priced stars at the trade deadline and the Giants (being one of the few teams with payroll flexibility) would be a position to snap them up. I think a lot of people thought he had Carlos Lee or Mags Ordonez on his mind when he was saying those things, which suggests a margin of up to $18 million (which frankly seems about right), but certainly Neukom’s comments after the season didn’t seem to suggest a $20 mil bump (of course, Neukom doesn’t seem like a man who’s going to say anything of substance publicly). So I’m at a bit of a loss — seems like there’s a pretty wide range for where the budget could wind up if they saw baseball opportunities that they really liked and wanted to take on.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Yeah, it’s difficult to be certain exactly how much payroll is available. I’m sure part of that is due to some flexibility on how much they spend depending on options available. I’m sure part of that is also that they don’t want the amount available to be public as that doesn’t help their job.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
I get where you’re coming from. I just wanted to be sure. The other thing is the franchise should have to spend less on Scrub veteran contracts in the coming years. If the front office does remains to be seen but it should have the option of not needing to. ( Mutters about Freddy Sanchez talk.)That would help a lot.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
We’ve made bad moves in the past. But there’s not a single team left in the playoffs that had lower than 100 million in payroll.
Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.
Man, it’s amazing that the Blue Jays are (just) below the line considering the contracts they gave to Wells and Rios. And Halladay making around $10 million a year as well.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
Well the Wells deal hasn’t really hit the books yet
08:$0.5M, 09:$1.5M, 10:$12.5M, 11:$23M, 12:$21M, 13:$21M, 14:$21M
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Ah, I didn’t realized it had such a crazy structure.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
Which makes this contract the worst in the league
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions
that’s a nice pay raise next year
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past. - Missing Barry
Holy crap!
Well, I guess there is at least one player for whom I would not trade Barry Zito.
I See You Don't Let The Truth Get In The Way Of Making Your Point.
Per Cots you left out
$25.5M signing bonus (paid in 3 $8.5M installments, March 1 2008-10)
Which makes Well’s contract in total 08:$9.0M, 09:$10.0M, 10:$23.0M 11-14:$21.0M/yr.
This per Cots is not all that different then Barry Zito’s 7yr – $126M contract.
07:$10M, 08:$14.5M, 09:$18.5M, 10:$18.5M, 11:$18.5M, 12:$19M, 13:$20M, 14:$18M club option ($7M buyout)
by giantsrainman on Oct 20, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Its cool. I just remember seeing that pay scale somewhere ans was all WTF…never thought of bonuses
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Rios actually gave the Blue Jays pretty good value. I don’t remember if they’re picking up any of his tab for the White Sox, but considering he signed in 2008 and gave them anwhere from 3-5.5 WAR (depending on how much you believe his fielding numbers) that season, and his contract still only averages $10M per year. I dunno where this perception that Rios’ contract is horrible came from – his production dropped off a cliff this year but at the time of the signing it was a pretty reasonable move, and even paid great dividends in year 1.
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn’t say it was as bad as the Wells contract – just that it’s a good chunk of money.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
But when looking at it in terms of payroll efficiency – dollars vs. wins, Rios acutally contributed on the positive side of things. I also meant to mention that having Halladay helps…
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Sure, I was just surprised the Blue Jays were below the $100 million mark.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
Oh I misintepreted that then. I thought you were talking about the overall payroll efficiency line, not just the $ spent line. Keep in mind that’s a 3 year average…
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I assumed it was a waiver wire trade of some sort?
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I think they just claimed him, and the Jays let the Sox keep ’em. No players in return, just a pure salary dump.
This is correct.
Rios was almost unbelievably terrible after the White Sox picked him up.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
.199 / .209 / .301 with 3 HR, 6 BB, and 29 K in 154 PA. 35 OPS+.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
I think at this point Rios fro Misch would be highway robbery by the Sox’s.
If we still had Misch
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions
I think we got our lines confused.
Also, LOL Seattle.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
How about by targeting younger players who require a smaller paycheck? Does it really make sense to target 31-year-old Jason Bay for the next six years, or to find a trade partner with a team that has a blocked player that the Giants might be able to pick up?
I’m not worried about them not increasing the payroll, I’m more concerned about them spending money stupidly.
I'm thinking but nothing's happening.
More importantly...
when did everyone start using the word “kerfluffle”? I feel like I read it for the first time last year, and I’ve seen it (on this website) at least twice in the past month or two.
Also, good post.
ugh, overpaying vets
i know jermaine dye is the sexy expectation for the giants to overpay, but if the issue is on base percentage as well as the concept of taking a pitching (obp goes up with a hitters count), i would think Abreu would be the guy Sabean has his eye on.
1. he plays in the postseason (see renteria’s ‘gamerness’ quality)
2. he hit pretty well in 2007
3. he’s a vet to take playing time away from nate
3. he led the league in pitches seen/taken.
maybe the last trait could rub off on some of the younger guys?
Badly under-rated, but . . .
. . . .the cold, hard fact is that he is 36 next season, and his productivity, while still admirable, is now visibly declining. Even though in a sane world this guy would be HOF first ballot, I for one would find it hard to recommend an acquisition unless it were a one-year deal.
Professional baseball analyst since 1980.
Abreu’s defense isn’t too hot though. Sabes usually likes to target those who have some defensive ability.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
renteria's defensive ability
almost as laughable as rowand’s gold glove abilities, flyout to center in the 9th inning of a no-hitter aside
How is the choice of Renteria relevant here?
It is not like the Giants had anything above Bocock to play SS so they were over a barrel to bring in some that could play SS for 1100+ innings at or above a AA level of play. That is not the case with in house corner Of spots however. Not even remotely close.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
Is this the same Omar that put up OPS+’s of 62 and 45 his last two years with Giants?
AS bad as Edgar was this year, he beat that (67)
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions
It is the same Omar who racked up 1.1 WAR for half the price we paid Edgar to be a replacement level player.
Besdides the Renteria/Bocock option is a false dichotomy. A lot of SS have changed hands the last 2 years, and we’ve fielded just about the worst one in the league consistently over that period.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
That came as a part-time player though.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
That is true, but I don’t think with another 300 PA’s to match Renteria’s ~full season he’d have racked up -0.8 WAR. In other words, making him play another half season, I doubt he’d be significantly below replacement level, which is what he’d have to be to match the show that Renteria put on.
SO you think by increasing Omar’s work load ( 191 innings in ’09) by over 5 times (Renteria played 1071 innings) he would has not productivity drop off or injury? I call. Show your cards for this.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
I didn’t realize he played so little defense. I saw that he had 195 PAs with the Rangers in ‘09 and figured that he’d actually played a third of a season on defense as well. He probably would’ve dropped off in productivity if he’d played as much as Renteria; I question whether he would’ve dropped off so much as to be as bad as Renteria. He had a higher wOBA than Renteria. To me, that’s just stunning.
Well considering the results of his ’07 & ’08 seasons with a manger that will never rest a vet I think he might not have been able to take the field for 1000 innings. Just for giggles would the inverse have been (using Uribe more often at SS as Renteria’s health declined) been a better choice still?
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
Just so I’m clear, if you’re asking if I would’ve taken more Uribe + less Renteria this year over Vizquel full time, the answer is yes. Things might get a little bit hazier if Jazz hands had been the Jazz hands of ‘05-’08.
The correct answer, it turns out, was Uribe + Vizquel. They’re a perfect platoon.
Btw, Omar actually played 424 innings in the field in 2009—just not all at short.
D’oh. Duh. I was wondering how anyone—even a pinch hitter—would get a PA/Inning.
As you point out, Evan, the correct answer was probably Vizquel + any replacement level player (which would still have been better than Renteria since 1.1+0> 0.3 WAR). Uribe having a well above average ML level year would’ve just been super gravy.
My bad in forgetting 101 innigs at 3rd base and 126 innings at 2nd base.
But then the question is how many much wear and tear SS is compared to 2nd & 3rd comes into play. And I really don’t feel like that that much heavy mental lifting. So I’ll cede that argument for now.
I like Uribe. I liked him last winter as well. But I really can’t advocate any team planning on him playing 900 (or more iinings) at the start of any season. It can work out that is the smart move by a given seasons end but it really shouldn’t be the plan going in.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
Subject to (big) small sample size caveats, Omar’s UZR/150 was actually better at SS than at 2B (although at 3B it was a ridiculously noisy and unsustainable 41.8).
I ceded 1 inning at SS being = 1 inning at 2nd or 3rd base because I just don’t have the mental juice to forward any reasonable conversion rate.
That done it still means Omar would have had to more than doubled ( almost 2 & ½ times) his work load with no ill effect on his production to equal Renteria ’10 on the Giants. A proposition I find to be very doubtful and I am yet so see anything that would sustain that much of a projection without substantial decline.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
In hindsight yes, but i don’t think anyone expected Omar to be able to perform as he has this year. Sometimes unexpected things happen.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
Sadly, many people expected Renteria to be able to perform as he has this year. Many times unexpected things don’t happen.
My Bucardo is better than yours.
A hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriter's myth, it is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.
Did they? I know many people disliked the Renteria contract and didn’t think he’d be great but i don’t think many expected him to be as bad as he has been.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
I bet Omar's D closed the gap a little though, right?
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
Unless that was the chasm I just fell into:
2009 Vizquel wOBA: 0.301
2009 Renteria wOBA: 0.283
So actually, Vizquel was just better this year.
No, he likes to target guys who he thinks have defensive ability. Big difference. Witness Aaron Rowand.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
Well, I think to be fair we do have to acknowledge that Sabean at least does a decent job of putting a good D out there. The Giants over the last 5 years or so have generally been one of the better defenses in baseball…
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 6:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Abreu's fielding ability . . .
. . . does not seem to be something on which there is universal agreement.
I really, really don’t think, though, that in The-Park-of-Many-Names he is the guy for RF. In LF, maybe; but his skills in all areas are declining visibly year to year now (which is not surprising for his age—indeed, his ability to steal bases even now is quite remarkable).
Professional baseball analyst since 1980.
We could play Yakity Sax whenever a ball is hit to RF!
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
Hey I know what your screen name is a reference to.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 19, 2009 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions
4. he once won the HR derby at the all-star game
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
No complaints
This is dead on. And the team is too incompetent to realize this.
Jonathan Sanchez. He's left-handed, like Barry Zito. His fastball breaks 80, unlike Zito.
Winning season bitches!
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past. - Missing Barry
not now Charlie.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
OT
I’m posting this from my DSi. Because I can. It would be crazy trying to follow a GDT on this thing.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
by Natto on Oct 19, 2009 9:23 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I posted a GDT from my iPhone once… I would not recommend it.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"AT LAST I AM A PARENTS." - Buster
/wants an iphone
yeah, my phone sucks. I posted on here with it a couple times and it’s not good.
Extremely proud adoptive parent of Paul E. Stanley, deserved all-star and hacker extraordinaire
Thanks to roger
I've never been happier to have Crabs
by bondslegend on Oct 19, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Google Phone FTW!!
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past. - Missing Barry
BUY CBS SPORTSLINE PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES!
WHY IS BOCOCK?!
by Lars The Wanderer on Oct 20, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions
G-1 in the hizzy!
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Do you like it? I was thinking about getting that new MyTouch thingie.
by Grant Brisbee on Oct 20, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions
Grant luring the intranet predators away from Chris Hansen and to MCC
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
You don’t want to talk to him about MyTouch.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
I like it. It’s a little blocky (which you don’t care about), and is clearly inferior to the iPhone (mostly because everything is), but I haven’t had any problems with Android and it really is only going to get better as Google figures out the market.
<3 Google.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
MyTouch is decent...
…but there are several other Android phones out or coming soon. A couple of note:
Sprint HTC Hero – available now.
Motorola Cliq – available now.
Motorola Droid – some sites suggesting November release.
Samsung Moment – available November 1st.
There’s quite a bit of buzz around the Droid. All of these phones have better processors, displays, etc. etc.
by calpolynate on Oct 20, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions
I got to play with the Moment for a moment on the street corner by my house (got a free Samsung bottle opener and beer cozy out of it) I really enjoyed for those 5 minutes. Its smooth and the nice thing is it has a QWERTY keypad. The coolest feature on it though (I’m not sure if other phones do this) is when you select something on the touch screen it really feels as if you pressed a button.
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions
How can people who control the fate of a multi-million business not have someone research if the Giants were really worse at situational hitting? How? How? How? I just did it on my lunch hour with the assistance of a free website.
Thanks, Grant. You’ve found a way to express the problem that makes me even more frustrated and pissy than I was before. HOORAY!
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
That's contrary to what was said in the pre-season
Neukom and Sabean both made mention that they have had an analyst in baseball operations for 15 years now, and I believe it was Jeremy Shelley who was noted to be that person somewhere.
According to his bio, the Senior Director of Baseball Operations/Pro Scouting “assists in the areas of player research, statistical analysis, major league contracts, arbitration preparation, as well as professional, international and amateur scouting. In addition, he also oversees the information systems within the scouting department.”
Neukom: sign up Sabean for another two years!
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Oct 19, 2009 10:38 PM PDT reply actions
We are aware that they have a STATS NERD on call.
It’s also pretty clear that either they don’t listen to him or he’s incompetent.
The failings of this team’s offense have been crystal-clear for years, but they keep making teh same damn mistakes over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
/sigh
The Giants, according to Forbes magazine, are the only large market MLB team to post nine straight years of positive operating income. Who cares about winning when even if you’re losing, you’re still making money, AMIRITE?
Yes.
Some may argue the Forbes rankings and the actual revenue stream and asset valuations, but by and large the San Francisco Baseball Company is who we thought they were.
The priorities of the SF Baseball Company seem to be ordered loosely in this order.
Preservation of assets
Capitol Conservation
Return on Investment
Revenue Enhancemant
Asset Growth
Preferred Parking
Complimentary Concessions
Whole bunch of other greedy ass shit
.
.
.
.
.
.
Win a World Series
You know you’re in trouble when the faces of your franchise look like Oroville Redenbacher, Skipper from Gilligans Island, Mt. Doomskull and Eraserhead with a perm
by E Ticket on Oct 20, 2009 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Whole bunch of other greedy ass shit
For some reason this made me laugh…
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions
I think that people get too worked up about what Sabean (or people in similar postions) say and infer things that aren’t necessarily true.
Just because Sabean and Bochy talk about the need to improve situational hitting doesn’t mean that they think it’s the most important thing we need to improve. Just because they fired the hitting coach doesn’t mean that they think that he’s the main problem with the offense.
There are a number of reasons why they emphasize some things in public but not other things. They aren’t going to come out and say the biggest problem with our offense is that our position players all suck and we need a load of new ones. Both because that doesn’t help things with the existing players and also it doesn’t help with negotiations over new players. Also, they can’t bring in news players yet and so only changes in coaching staffs are made at this time.
With regards to Molina there’s no reason to close off any options at the moment especially when there’s arbitration decisions to be made. So I wouldn’t take anything from comments about him, we can save the criticism for if he’s re-signed.
I’m not saying that there isn’t too much emphasis on some things (such as situational hitting) or that there shouldn’t be criticism of Sabean / Bochy (and i’m happy to criticise as well) but it’s a pet hate of mine when i see people have the misguided expectation that GM’s or managers should speak like fans when their jobs dictate otherwise.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
I fail to see a reason to leave any options open for Molinia.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
I fail to see a reason for not leaving your options open for Molina or any other player for that matter.
One reason is we have to decide whether to offer him arbitration, and we’d be in a strange position if we were to say we don’t want him back and then offer him arbitration. Another is that we could well be looking for another catcher in free agency and so it reduces your bargaining position if you rule out some of the options. Another could be that he comes crawling back offering to player for the league minimum as a backup (obviously unlikely). Another could be if he’s available as a minor league free-agent in future years. Another could be that they don’t want him back but would like to leave on positive terms. It serves no purpose for a GM to rule out options which is why they’re generally non-committal about individual players.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
we’d be in a strange position if we were to say we don’t want him back and then offer him arbitration
If that convinces him not to accept arbitration, I’m all for this.
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Me as well.
And it was not like the league was knocking down Molinia’s door 3 years ago to offer him a job, let alone a starting gig. So No, this would not be a strange position at all. He got well paid and an opportunity to show the baseball world he could catch more than 1000 innings a season and not falling apart. He can either try and move to another such opportunity with a different club or be gracious and accept the backup gig. Well if we had a real front office that is.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
Well what i meant was that I’m not sure how well it’d go down with the players association, etc, if we offered arbitration to a player we’d explicitly said we didn’t want. There’s nothing wrong with offering him arbitration and persuading him to reject (by saying he wouldn’t get much playing time etc) or if we don’t want him back but I’m sure we’d rather not state publicly that we don’t want him back in any capacity.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
This team needs a new catcher for ’10 if it retains Molinia anyways. If he is retained he will be hitting clean up again (if not Big Head should be fired for batting him there down the stretch of ’09). Molinia glove work is not terrible yet but it is slipping. He produces outs at a rate that he is not much better than a pitcher hitting. Only his ISO is redeeming. And our manager as already shown he can’t use Molinia properly. I am still looking for reason to advocate re-upping Molinia in a Bochy managed 2010 squad.
Who’s brain did you bring me?
Brain SabeanOranother.
Well I’m not going to give you one because i don’t want Molina back at all myself. I don’t really see advantage it does to publicly come out and say explicitly that we don’t want him back in any capacity.
Proud parent of Waldis Joaquin!
There is nothing to say except “adios” to a guy who ranked 153 out of 154 qualified batters in all of Major League Baseball in on base percentage. To accept umpteen million dollars, walk a paltry 68 times in over 500 plate appearances, and than whine about being disrespected when a first round phenom is added to the roster as a September call-up while you’re sprawled out behind the plate not blocking pitches in the dirt and above the shoulder while not framing strikes because your corpulent, fat out of shape carcass won’t move anymore, is the height of delusion.
I don’t care if Posey only got three hits a week, he can at least move behind the plate, and actually resembles a ball player more than a “before” picture of a Jenny Craig client.
by E Ticket on Oct 20, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions
68?
That’s a funny typo. Bengie hasn’t walked 68 times since he’s been with the Giants (47 in three seasons). He walked 13 times this past season, and struck out 68 times.
Total type-o
Thinkin 13 and typing 68. aixelsyd gnikcuf
by E Ticket on Oct 20, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Just want to say…HOLY FUCKING SHIT…went last night and the last time I had this much fun at a game was 200…well you know when. And the only thing better than a Giants win is a Dodgers loss, and in the bottom of the ninth with 2 outs. From a guy who has been slumping all year.
Suck it, J Martin (WTF, J?)
Suck it, greatest manager evar!
Suck it, not Mariano Rivera!
Suck it, DODGERS!
I also have make a confession. I have a Howard shirt I wear to all the playoff and non-Giant Phillies games. Does that make me a bad person?
I R 5
I hate this org.
How can they preach contact as a strategy for success on BOTH sides of the ball? On one side they tell the pitchers to trust the defense, pitch to contact and get deeper in the game, and on the offensive side they teach, make contact to move runners over. How retarded can they possibly be.
Confounding.
Injury prone gritty vet?
I think we already are.
Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.
I’d rather have a first baseman who’s actually a top-notch power hitter for the first time since 1993.
Not that that’s going to happen. Only the Giants think of first base as a position for slick fielding singles-and-doubles hitters.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
So you’re killin me for restricting my hopes to the bounds I’ve been dealt as a San Francisco Giants fan? Screw you man, what do you think this is a Yankee board?
by Cody_ransom on Oct 20, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions
He averaged 580+ PA in 3/4 seasons in DC
He the best OBP guy available and his health question marks make him attainable on a budget that is going to stay the same according to Sabean.
You have an interesting way of posting.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
You have an interesting way of smelling.
by Cody_ransom on Oct 20, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions
This is true
Unlike many humans, I use the pores on my skin to smell, rather than my nose. As you can probably guess, this can be troublesome at times, but fortunately, I have allergies, so they’re always clogged.
I know you nerds know NOTHING about the real game of baseball, or any other athletic endeavor requiring teamwork under physical stress.
Mr. F! | comics | art | New Nattowear | Unofficial McImage Directory
Alergies suck.
Just coming down from my predinzone scrip. Inflamation in the lungs. Stupid Arizona Rye Grass.
by Cody_ransom on Oct 20, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions
I smell through my navel and breathe through my ears.
Also, I can shake my eyeballs back and forth rapidly in a way that really freaks some people out.
One of those is actually true.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
My navel smells, too. Sometimes I put my finger in there and smell it just to be sure. And every time it’s pretty gross.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Oct 20, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Whoa
I don’t think that’s your mom…..
Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all
McFAQ for all you newcomers out there.
GET THAT VORP AND WHIP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!
Grant, something is wrong with your comment about the Giants bunting. The league average was 73% the Giants were next to last at 70%. Did you mean total bunts? Well, that’s meaningless, it’s how often you try and succeed that matters.
I just meant attempts. People say the Giants need to bunt more, yet they bunt as much as the average team.
by Grant Brisbee on Oct 20, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
I still say every hitter should at least fake a bunt for the first three innings to tire out the pitcher.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
You mock it now, but just wait! A pitcher thinking “OMG, HE MIGHT FAKE BUNT AND GIVE ME STRIKE FREE. WTF! WHAT IF HE HITS IT ON PURPOSE DURING HIS FAKE BUNT! THEN HE WILL BE ON 1ST! BETTER NOT THROW TO HIM!” Gets to a pitcher better than having some stupid hitter like BLB (circa 2002) in the lineup.
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions
First of all, the reply button is your friend.
Second of all, the point is, there’s very little difference between the league average and the worst in the league in this particular category – and probably between the best in the league and the worst in the league. The distance between the Giants and the league average or the league leaders in runs scored, OBP, SLG, and wOBA is much greater.
Also, I don’t agree that the total number of bunts is meaningless. Yes, having a high success rate is important, but if you steal 80 bases with an 80% success rate, that’s a lot more bases than if you steal 4 bases with an 80% success rate.
Also, sacrifice bunts are usually a bad idea, so there’s that, too.
Brian Sabean wants to kick tires. I want to kick Brian Sabean.
Adopted Giant: FREDEMPTION Lewis
yeah, sorry about the reply thing. I messed that up.
Well, my point was that his post was misleading and wrong. At least the way I read it. I agree that bunting isn’t that great an option many times. I also agree that their biggest problem is that they don’t have enough good hitters period, especially when it comes to OBP.
Jet
OT:
It is a beautiful day in Philly. With an off day scheduled between two games in Philly why couldn’t the commissioner slide one of the last two games(FREAKING COLD) to today?
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 11:49 AM PDT reply actions
For some reason your comment made me think of this Giants Fandom related quote:
"You want a prediction about the weather, you’re asking the wrong Phil. I’ll give you a winter prediction: It’s gonna be cold, it’s gonna be grey, and it’s gonna last you for the rest of your life. "
Brian says a lot of things. Brian only does one thing, though. Get low OBP hacking suckholes who’s best years are in the past. - Missing Barry
Which is nice, the weather has been absolutely horrible the last week. We went straight from summer to winter…ugh. Were tickets expensive yesterday, by the way? It would be fun to go but I don’t want to spend a lot of money…
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Friend is season ticket holder. Sunday night I went un-planned, his wife couldn’t go b/c she felt sick at he called me at 7:15 to see if I wanted to go, I was at his house at 7:10. Last night, i sat in 432, top deck three sections from the end in left field. I got the tixs for $85 from my friend b/c as a season ticket holder he has the option of buying extra seats in the playoffs. You just don’t know where they are going to be. His usually seats are 1b dugout 20 rows up
I R 5
by say hey nation on Oct 20, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
"Most pressing will be to identify ways to improve our offensive production and on base percentage and to create a more consistent one through five line up."
Pop quiz hot Shot. You got around 20 to 25 million dollars to improve your team. You’ve identified that OBP is the main problem. What do you do WHAT DO YOU DO?
Sabeans answer: Thats easy resign Sanchez and Uribe, and hope Molina accepts a short team deal, and by short tear I mean 2 years with an option.
This should help our OBP, I mean didn’t you see how hot Uribe was in September. There’s no way he falls back to his career norms.
amd lets not forget
sanchez is a batting champion – which means he must have a good OBP, right?
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
OT: Truly, there is no better season than Fall, with all the good holidays and the falling of the leaves and the changing of warm to cold, there is nothing better, especially with football, and postseason baseball, Sharks playing, and the warriors about to start playing
’cept for the sharks and warriors part
well, it was really gary thomasson--the great, giant, fan
Language of the McCoven--TWSS!, Meh!, STFD!, Bork!, Fail!, STFD! STFD! STFD!
by greatgiantfan on Oct 20, 2009 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions
hockey, I just don’t get. But the Horror-iors, that’s a whole nuther subject
well, it was really gary thomasson--the great, giant, fan
Language of the McCoven--TWSS!, Meh!, STFD!, Bork!, Fail!, STFD! STFD! STFD!
by greatgiantfan on Oct 20, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
and the changing of warm to cold
postseason baseball
Sharks playing
Those all seem to contradict this?:
there is nothing better
by Missing Barry on Oct 20, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Sabean Logic
“Hey, I really want that Vladimir Guerrero guy. He is a proven winner with 8 All-Star selections, and I need someone to replace Randy Winn with in the outfield. The Giants want me to get a big bat, and Vlad has been batting .322 throughout his career. I know he has all those knee injuries so he only bat .295 in 2009, but that’s better than everyone else on this team but Pablo and he should return to form next year. The Angels were paying him about $14 million a year for the last 5 years, so I’m going to have to overpay them for their superstar. How does a $45 million contract over 3 years sound, Vlad? He also won the Home Run Derby in AT&T Park in 2007, so he’ll be able to hit home runs out of the park for lots of RBI’s. Hey, I might even put him behind Bengie so that when Bengie hits a double, Vlad can send him home! This plan is infallible!”
"I never watched baseball on TV. It's slow and boring. I'm not a fan. Never was." - Jeff Kent
yawn. is this going to go on all winter?
well, it was really gary thomasson--the great, giant, fan
Language of the McCoven--TWSS!, Meh!, STFD!, Bork!, Fail!, STFD! STFD! STFD!
by greatgiantfan on Oct 20, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes. It will be especially bad this year.
WHY IS BOCOCK?!
by Lars The Wanderer on Oct 20, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions
/sayeth the norseman
well, it was really gary thomasson--the great, giant, fan
Language of the McCoven--TWSS!, Meh!, STFD!, Bork!, Fail!, STFD! STFD! STFD!
by greatgiantfan on Oct 20, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Name the ways that Baseball is unique
I’ll check in with the relay. Using Rollins game winner last night (lolodgers). The ball is over there, the runners over here, all sorts of maneuvering in between, now the ball is in the air with the runners trying to beat it to the plate—Awesome!
well, it was really gary thomasson--the great, giant, fan
Language of the McCoven--TWSS!, Meh!, STFD!, Bork!, Fail!, STFD! STFD! STFD!
carried over to new thread…
well, it was really gary thomasson--the great, giant, fan
Language of the McCoven--TWSS!, Meh!, STFD!, Bork!, Fail!, STFD! STFD! STFD!
by greatgiantfan on Oct 20, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions
prediction
Sabean starts to value OBP.
Downside: he thinks .300 is good.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
by zenbitz on Oct 20, 2009 5:15 PM PDT via mobile reply actions

by 



















