Defend Kruk & Kuip
There's an incredibly snarky article on sfgate.com about Kruk & Kuip. I registered with the site simply to respond to the article- I'd hate for Kruk & Kuip to read the article and think that the rest of Giants fans share the opinion of the author. The article is here.
I realize there are people out there that don't like the Giants announcers, but from my personal experience, they would be in the minority.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
118 comments
|
Comments
Kruk and Kuip won an emmy for their quality work. Tim Goodman, the writer of this article, as far as I can tell, hasn’t done anything in his career but artificially criticize things for a paycheck (it says so right in his sfgate bio).
Winner: Kruk and Kuip.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
Goodman is considered one of the best television critics today. His reviews of shows are very good and extremely well-written, even if I don’t ALWAYS agree with him (he didn’t like Firefly, for example… The bastard.).
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
I didn’t like Firefly based on “The Train Job” either (except for the one part at the end with the jet engine). It’s really not a very good introduction the way the 2-hour pilot is.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.
Funny you say that!
I introduced my wife to the real pilot episode and she was kind of meh about the show. Then I showed her the Train Job episode and she was hooked! Most people I’ve talked to didn’t like the pilot very much, but really got into the TJ episode.
Weird.
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
No way! The real pilot is SO much better. We must also have opposite most people we’ve talked to’s, because most people I’ve talked to prefer the real pilot.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I tried to look up some info on Goodman before I commented, but I didn’t see anything substantial so I went with my gut.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
And that makes you a jerk for saying anything bad about the best writer the Chronicle employs!
Not that he’s facing stiff competition… But he’s still really good.
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
Just edging me one step closer to the jerk award!
It wasn’t a fair criticism. You’re absolutely right.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't say "edging" and "jerk" in the same sentence! HowTheyScored might see it and--
Oh. Nevermind. I see.
I'm adopting a true Giant and an awe-inspring gamer: tk. "Atta babe."
If I could award it now... You'd win hands down! =)
I kid, man!
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
If you read his column
on a regular basis, you are absolutely fair in judging him harshly. You don’t need to see what others think of him to form your own opinion. His reviews have let me down more than a couple times. I have even exchanged emails with him regarding some flippant remarks he made that could only be described as gratuitous.
I think he’s vastly overrated and I am not a fan.
On the other hand I believe the Giants have to have one of the best broadcast teams anywhere. This is purely anecdotal evidence, but I listen to other broadcasts whenever I travel and so far none have been able to match the Giant’s guys for entertaining and insightful commentary.
Well, it was pretty much unfair BECAUSE I don’t read his column on a regular basis. The criticism may or may not be valid, but it wasn’t well informed.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Tim Goodman
Tim Goodman spoke at a feature writing class I took a few years back. He was extremely impressive. Prior to that I didn’t even know who he was, but I began reading his well-written reviews thereafter.
Actually, I have to agree with Goodman. I found the article more critical of the direction of the broadcast, and less of the announcers. It does drive me nuts the amount of time they spend on folks in the stands, and then coming back right as the pitcher is delivering the ball. I believe the Giants’ have the best broadcast team in baseball, and this is just an honest look at thier work.
Yup, that’s how I felt too. The article is more lamenting the fact that Kruk is forced into too much color commentary due to shitty producers.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
the only thing i dont like is kruk’s “open base” theory. i feel like hes all for pitching around guys and driving up pitch counts. in my opinion if theres a runner on first and second, there is not an open base and i donno why youd ever wanna walk the bases loaded
proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..
Well, Tom Seaver was a huge proponent of pitching around hitters (in certain situations, of course) so I think there is merit there. Seaver is by far the most intelligent pitching mind I’ve had the pleasure of reading. If there are two outs, and the on deck hitter is slumping, or the pitcher is on deck, I don’t mind the intentional/unintentional BB there.
It depends...
If you have runners on 1st and 2nd you do have a base open. Do you want to pitch to some guy that mashes with 2 runners on, or pitch to a lesser hitter with the bases loaded? A 3-run home run is not worth avoiding a bases loaded situation. You have to consider number of outs, and who might pinch hit as well, but all things being equal, you pitch to the lesser hitter.
Except
In this case, all things are never equal because in chosing to pitch to the lesser hitter you put a man on base.
Eugeniooooooo!!!!
by FairweatherFan on Jul 7, 2008 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions
All things being equal
meaning there are no mitigating factors, like less than 2 outs, a masher getting the day off but available to pinch hit, that sort of thing. But if Albert Pujols is in the box and Ryan Ludwick hitting 60 points less is on deck, I don’t believe in coming in with a fastball on 3-1 to Pujols. Same thing with Jermaine Dye hitting 80 points better than Jim Thome. There are guys that will hurt you more than others, and you don’t let that guy beat you. Think how many times it worked with Bonds when the Giants couldn’t deliver hitting behind him.
With my Son at my side I shall destroy you.
Tentatively adopting Dan Ortmeier. And Boom Goes the Dynamite.
Kruk is why I am a Giants Fan
But it is not for the Fanshots. And I actually made myself stop watching for some time last year because Kruk was “overselling” a shitty team.
I know it was about 10 years ago, and I cannot remember who the left fielder was but it was an opponent. He went toward the stands for a pop foul and ended up going over the rail and into the lap of an attractive woman in the first row. And Kruk said “That was a Veteran Move”.
I’ve been a fan since.
I might add that
Tim Goodman is a TV critic and by nature more of an artistic personality than a sports fan personality, but even so, when the Giant’s bats are flaccid the entire broadcast can be tedious, not just the fanshots.
I have found the DVR replay on the +1 speed is the best way to watch the games anyway, when I am not there. When see something I back it up and watch at normal speed, and then move on again. I can get the game watched in about an hour or so that way.
Yeah but...
...would a lousy baseball game really be more entertaining if they spent more camera time on the game itself?
You can’t hold the TV crew responsible for how well or badly the Giants play.
The All-Father is now a Giant!
I don’t get why people make such a big deal out of the shots of fans in the stands. I think its fine. Its a perfect filler for the 10-15 seconds of no action between pitches or after an out has been made etc. I’d rather watch that then see some stupid interview with Amy G and some has been celebrity like Christian Slater at the Dodger game. Besides it gives Kruk and Kuip more things to comment on and make me laugh.
Yeah. I’ve always liked the fun Kruk and Kuip have commenting on ball dudes, funny looking people and parents trying to deal with their their kids (maybe it’s not as much fun for non-parents). A great example was a game last week where a baby’s knit cap was pulled down over its eyes and the parents were oblvivious. Kruk and Kuip were having fun with “Can I get a little help here? I can’t see anything!” I’ve also enjoyed when Kruk eliminates people/things (like Larry King’s Dodger cap).
What I don’t like are the shmaless plugs for different vendors. Yeah, you can build a bear at the ball park. We get it.
2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!
yeah, sure, hop into the stands every once in awhile, but not after every pitch. Then as soon as the pitch is taken, back to the 5 year old stuffing cotton candy in his mouth with the orange hulk hand and ice cream in his hair. Then back to Cain just as he throws the ball, ball two…back to hulk kid. I mean really.
As for Amy G., I wish her all the luck in the world in some other job.
I dig Kruk and Kuip
And I also dig Tim Goodman. His articles have been some of my favorite reads for a long time now. Other than his poor review of Firefly. He also didn’t really care for Chuck, which is a pretty funny show (co-starring The Hero of Canton, the man they call Jayne).
Anyway, I agree with the people above, it didn’t really read as much of criticism of Kruk and Kuip as much as the broadcast. I agree with him, I could do without all the excess fan shots and other stuff. And while Kruk is definitely a homer for the Giants, I really enjoy when he talks pitching, strategy, etc. I find he has a lot of great insight.
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
I’ll always like Tim Goodman because of how he championed Arrested Development.
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
I miss Arrested Development
Michael and George Michael, Gob and Buster, and the rest of the gang…
Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.
"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 7, 2008 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Ah.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions
+1
Forgot that somehow… That’s one of the biggest things that made me a huge Goodman fan!
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
I agree with everyone else that the criticism was not of Kruk and Kuip, it was of the broadcast itself. I read here before that fans like that they show more of normal fans that they do of hot chicks, but I have to say that I would really prefer to see the hot young women. Don’t any go to the games??
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
Clearly you weren't watching yesterday
They had an entire inning where they were basically ogling girls in the McCovey Loft. Kruk eliminated the guys who were there with them and everything. It was pretty good.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.
This thread highlights the folly that is "Fanshots" on the SBNation sites
Someone made an earnest attempt to bring this out as a ‘Fanshot’ rather than a thread, and then when this thread came up, the Framed Drug-Dealing Carmaker tried to point it out. His was the first comment every poster read (or, you know, should have read) before posting here, but did so anyway. Nobody did anything wrong, as such, but it just shows that the “Fanshot” thing does not work. And this is coming in a period when we are trying to be conscious of not duplicating threads.
Carry on.
I'm adopting a true Giant and an awe-inspring gamer: tk. "Atta babe."
The surprising thing for me is how different the tone of each one is. The responses in the Fanshot are much more “Goodman’s being stupid about this,” while the resonses here are much more “Goodman’s fairly criticizing the broadcast itself, and not being particularly or unfairly negative to either Kruk or Kuip.”
It seems to be one of those cases where duplication results in a varied response.
I do agree that the Fanshots aren’t proving very effective for stories like these. They seem to be doing fairly well for videos and photos, though.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
The problem with Fanshots
As most people who work on websites for a living can tell you, “below the fold” on a webpage=death. It’s the Internet equivalent of the 2am infomercial.
Eagerly awaiting Crazy Crab Bobblehead Night on 7/18.
I have been working on websites for a living for the past two months, and I actually know what you mean! And you’re right. Downscrolling so far is a kiss of death.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes, I deal with the same thing in my world, except for me it’s “anything below the waist doesn’t get any attention”.
2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!
You just need to reconfigure your proportions so that the waist rests at knee level, and the gibblies are all above that. I’m sure somebody could do the coding for you on that.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Thinking outside the box. I like that.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I didn't even know there were fanshots
until today. not really, but I rarely pay attention to them as i’m too lazy to scroll to the bottom of the front page.
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 7, 2008 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions
This might be bad, but...
I knew they were there. I just didn’t care. Actually, I still don’t care!
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
Fanshots and repeating posts
I agree about the Fanshots. In fact, I thought they were supposed to be where you posted images or clips of videos from the web. I made sure there was not a thread post about this article, so I went ahead and posted it. Honestly, I didn’t even check Fanshots because I thought they were specifically for posting images/videos or links to images/videos.
a period when we are trying to be conscious of not duplicating threads
Frankly, I have seen little evidence of this. Just as many duplicated threads this last week as in the past.
I think that it is just the 20 or so of us who are conscious of this, and wouldn’t have done it in the first place.
Eugeniooooooo!!!!
Alas, you might well be right.
I'm adopting a true Giant and an awe-inspring gamer: tk. "Atta babe."
Oh Well
I figured I’d put it as a Fanshot, since I didn’t have too much to say about it… lol not a big deal though. It’s not as though physical clutter is accumulating.
I think you actually got a pretty good amount of commentary in the fanshot.
And putting it down there because you don’t personally having much to say about it was the right move. You’re actually utilizing the system the way it was designed to be used!
It was good stuff.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Also
I think the problem I have with it is Goodman’s tone is that “Cut all this “fun” crap, this baseball sport is serious business!” But its clear that he doesn’t listen or watch very often himself, however, if he thinks:
Though Giants fans have, through the years, come to adopt this duo as a beloved institution (fans still wear the pair’s replica Giants jerseys), their digressions can be both annoying and pedestrian and a stark contrast to the work of Jon Miller, who broadcasts for both the Giants and ESPN.
LOL John Miller doesn’t digress? As I said in my comment on the article, earlier this year, I heard Miller and Flemming talk for an entire inning about Latin state mottoes! We (my family and I) didn’t remember a thing that happened in the inning, and we loved it, because it was hilarious.
He might not have every listened to Miller on the radio. Miller on ESPN doesn’t really (get to?) do the fun stuff.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Man, I make that every typo ALL the time. It doesn’t even make sense as a typo…
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
This is true, Jon doesn’t have the room for his esoteric and funny stuff on ESPN like he has on the Giants broadcasts. I was shocked (SHOCKED) when a friend who isn’t a Giants fan described Jon Miller as pedestrian and tedious as a broadcaster. Then I realized she only knew his ESPN broadcasts and I kind of had to give her that one.
I need to send her the call of the Ruben Rivera game and that should get her to see the light.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Miller
Digresses much more than KnK, without a doubt.
He will go on for innings about some players name.
Eugeniooooooo!!!!
by FairweatherFan on Jul 7, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
yeah
but he’s better at it. Earlier this season, Flem’s daughters were eating a strawberry shortcake, and Miller became so obsessed that he went on for about three innings and missed several pitches…it was actually hilarious…
Goodman...
Is actually a rabid Giants fan. Don’t know how much he gets to watch/listen, because he has to watch other shows pretty much all the time for his job. Man, I’m glad I don’t have to watch TV for a living! =(
My suspicion isn’t that Tim was saying KnK digress but Miller doesn’t as much as the style of Jon’s digressions probably don’t grate on his nerves as much. I think it’s a different experience broadcasting the game on the radio than it is on TV, so the radio digressions don’t seem to blatantly obvious and annoying.
Like I said, I like Kruk and Kuip, but they do digress a little too often. I don’t think it’s necessarily their fault, as much as the broadcaster’s fault, though.
"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler
I like Goodman’s writing a lot, but comparing Kruk and Kuip’s work for a local broadcast aimed at Giants fans with a national one aimed at baseball fans in general (which is what Jon Miller does on ESPN radio/TV) is kind of a jury-rigged argument. They’re totally different in their pacing and their information, and the assumptions they place on the viewing audience.
That said, the fact that Jon Miller works so well in both settings really speaks to how good a broadcaster he is.
Eagerly awaiting Crazy Crab Bobblehead Night on 7/18.
Jon Miller
My favorite is Jon Miller’s impression of the Japanese Broadcaster that mimics Vin Scully. Absolutely hilarious.
K&K are great... nevertheless...
as I said in the limbo-we-call-Fanshots, it’s not profaning the sacred or committing blasphemy to not love everything about Krukow’s mannerisms. I could happily go the rest of eternity without hearing “Grab some pine, meat” (and it’s especially horrible hearing other people say it, shudder), or the word “Gamer.” (I hope this year’s ad campaign will kill that word.)
As for Goodman, who is a tv critic, I think he provides an insight of what the casual fan experiences. We are the initiated; he’s not. We listen to K&K on the radio, which is an accumulation of experience that also informs how we relate to them on tv; he does not. HIs experience isn’t ours. Hey, somewhere out there is some blurb-o-matic movie critic who liked “Indy Jones/Crystal Skull”—and even that idiot was reporting his experience with it, not making Grand Truths.
I'm adopting a true Giant and an awe-inspring gamer: tk. "Atta babe."
Has anyone here ever listened to another team's broadcast crew?
If you have, you would think KnK, Flemming, and Miller were gifts from heaven. Like all people – they are not perfect, but god damn compared to what else is out there they are pretty damn close.
Believe it or not, doing a good sports broadcast is extremely hard. It requires an in depth knowledge of the game, a quality voice, and a capacity for unrehearsed on the spot commentary and analysis (amongst other things). These things are fairly uncommon in of themselves – to find them combined is pretty unique.
Look at all of the “second tier” guys we have to deal with in the Giants org – FP, Pappa, JT, Bip – ETC. They all have one or more of the above talents – but not all.
KnK, Dave, and Miller combine them all (plus more). It is really a rare combination.
And yes, a good friend of mine works in Radio and i’ve seen what he has had to learn to even be able to hang – and he was born with an amazing voice.
Eugeniooooooo!!!!
So true. We are blessed to have good announcers. That’s why I try not to bash KNBR that much, sports radio in a lot of other places I’ve visited is about 1000x times worse than the people we get to listen to here in the Bay Area.
I listened to a White Sox braodcast once
it hurt. a lot.
Also, the A’s guys are boring old reactionaries.
you can't block the Bocock
So true. On both accounts. The White Sox homers make Mike Krukow look like a Giants hater.
But their homerun call is hilarious if not annoying. “You can put it on the BOARD!!!!!! YEEEEESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!”
JT Has neither the Voice
Or the fluidity to cut it, IMO.
Eugeniooooooo!!!!
by FairweatherFan on Jul 7, 2008 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions
I know where you're heading with this
Right here.
Eagerly awaiting Crazy Crab Bobblehead Night on 7/18.
either… or
neither… nor
This officially makes up for me looking like a fool about the whole “with regard to” issue.
It also continues to get me closer to that coveted jerk award. I got uninformed jerk earlier today, and this covers grammar jerk. This award is as good as mine!
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions
This
Exactly right. They’re not perfect, but we’ll all miss the hell out of them when they’re no longer doing Giants games.
Eagerly awaiting Crazy Crab Bobblehead Night on 7/18.
THEY WILL BE DOING GIANTS GAMES FOREVER
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.
I live in SD
....so I sometimes listen to Padres broadcasts on the radio on the way home from work. Their announcers are terrible! Just terrible! I thought it was just them, but having had the MLB package in the past there are just a lot of bad announcers out there who actually take away from the game.
Its a in-depth critical article with fair points on the broadcasts, but it should have come with a much more pronounced, “but they’re still among the best in the game” feel.
Remember Joe Angel?
He could never quite fit in with the broadcast team because he was so into announcing a game. All the Giants announcers (well, KnK, Miller and Flem) have a conversational style that makes it seem like we’re watching the game with them and listening to their comments instead of being annouced to, a la Joe Angel.
On the other hand, I’d be eternally grateful if they could make some room for Ted Robinson. I really like him.
2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!
Under-appreciated when he was here. Good call.
And part of that was, I think, Krukow’s fairly obvious disdain of him. Ted Robinson is a total pro of an announcer. I don’t love his chirpy voice, but he’s an exceptional announcer of sports, knowledgeable, no schtick, professional. I’m with you.
I'm adopting a true Giant and an awe-inspring gamer: tk. "Atta babe."
I respectfully disagree.
Although he’s was better than many we have had, I think he is much better at tennis than baseball. In fairness, part of my opinion stems from one game I heard him do. Aurillia playing short, went horizontal, snagged a line drive, but lost the ball went he hit the ground and so the runner was safe. Ted Robinson said that was why baseball was better than football because the ground could cause a fumble. He spent the next 30-40 seconds ranting on about how could it be that the ground could not cause a fumble in football. Besides the fact that he was comparing apples and oranges, it demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of the concepts behind the various rules. It was one of the most moronic statements I have ever heard a professional broadcaster make.
Robinson’s good calling baseball (I’ll always remember his JT Snow HR call in the 2000 playoffs) but yes, he’s better calling tennis.
Ted Robinson, Mary Carillo and John McEnroe covering tennis matches together are unbelievably great. They’re the Kruk and Kuip of tennis broadcasters.
Eagerly awaiting Crazy Crab Bobblehead Night on 7/18.
I agree
about that team calling tennis. I think McEnroe is impeccable.
I didn’t hear Robinson’s call on Snow’s homer. That night I was sitting in the arcade just on the foul side of the pole. In spite of missing the call, I did get a very nice perspective of the ball heading in my general direction. Maybe I am being unfair to Robinson because of his idiotic tirade in one game, but I wasn’t much of a fan before that either.
I think Robinson is good at baseball
andtennis, not to mention short-track speed skating :-)
He’s also VERY good when he’s on KNBR. If I could take over KNBR for just one day, I’d make it the “Ted and Mr. T Show” and throw Ralph in the river. When Ted has been a guest host with Ralph, Ralph never lets Ted get a word in…just talk right over the top of him. And Ted clearly has more knowledge to share, both his own and what insiders have told him.
I can turn any announcer discussion into an anti-Ralph thread.
2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!
And I am with you on that.
In spite of not being a fan of Ted Robinson’s I think he would be a significant upgrade over the razor.
But let me ask you this question
If you had a choice between not listening to Ralph Barbieri and curing cancer would you force yourself to endure Ralph, I mean he’s pretty grating what with the voice and all and he doesn’t bring much, if any insight to his program; his sole claim to fame is how long he’s been with the station and his reputation as a person who asks tough questions in interviews but I’ve never really been that impressed with any of his questions; I mean he is direct and he isn’t afraid to point out negatives but it’s nothing…heh…that special; I mean, his personality is kind of dry and there’s really nothing…interesting about him; I mean, am I being unfair to say that not listening to him is worth not curing cancer?
Only 882 games until the end of Zito's contract
Put me slightly in the defense of Kruk and Kuip camp. I love them both to death.
But I don’t necessarily disagree with Goodman. I mean, I heard Kruk fill in on a national Fox broadcast in 2003 and Kruk was on fire. He talked only about the game, no schtick, and damn was he good, going over what pitches were working for Jerome Williams and why they were and just adding a ton of insight to my enjoyment of the game.
If Goodman wants Kruk to do more of that and less of the “eliminate me ” thing, I can understand why.
Statement doesn’t apply to the “EliminateMe” who posts here at McCovey Chronicles—because he/she is awesome, too.
EMe is way too much of a homer. His attempts at adding color and humor to the site are poor and frankly, a bit sad.
criticisms of Kruk basically unfair
most fans who get eliminated either ask for it (“Eliminate me, it’s my birthday!”), or are with someone who they ask to eliminate (“Eliminate him, it’s his birthday!”). Yes, he also eliminates Dodger fans and dudes hitting on chicks or idiots on their cell phones, but the people watching probably don’t mind it too much. It could get old, I suppose, but it doesn’t interfere with the action. Heck, they turned it into a regular feature with a sponsor. That’s pretty smart, if you ask me.
I also don’t recall Kruk overusing the term “gamer” until this season when the Giants used it as a marketing ploy. Hopefully that will be gone after a while.
Overall, some of Goodman’s criticism is fair, as it relates to the overall broadcast, but I do think he overstates the role the the announcers have in that production. Maybe they get the brunt because they’re the guys we see and hear.
“Grab some pine, meat” is a classic. That’s how baseball players talk to each other. Nothing wrong with that.
I don’t think Kruk has ratcheted up his enthusiasm or homerism just because the team has been bad. I just think because the team has been bad, there’s been more dead time on the air and more time to let the mind drift and there’s been more quantity than the good ol’ days. They’ve fill that time with some really wacky humor, and I appreciate it. Kruk and Kuip are as good as ever and are the best announcers in all of baseball, hands down.
Plus, every once in awhile, Aaron Rowand takes a nasty shit.
What’s not to enjoy about that?
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
by nostocksjustbonds on Jul 7, 2008 9:08 PM PDT reply actions
Not only does Rowand take a nasty shit, but they can LOL about it and reference it later and make Jon Miller crack up on air.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions
THAT WAS AWESOME!
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Jul 8, 2008 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions
The wrap a few weeks after the incident when Krukow goes “IT WAS NASTY!” and you see Jon Miller barely out of frame just dying of laughter was seriously the funniest thing ever.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 8, 2008 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions
I have no complaints about any of our main four broadcasters
And it’s not just because they are ours. I hated Joe Angel, as many above have stated. There was also that one guy who tried to break into the business with the Giants. I can’t remember his name. He was around about the same time as Angel. I remember one time they had him report in from the building across the street from the place that used to be called Enron Field. It was hilarious. I notice they have never made Flem do anything like that. But then, Flem is light years ahead of that guy.
Oh and Greg Pappa sucks.
Only 884 games until the end of Zito's contract
I remember that guy...
but I forget his name too. I remember they once had him reporting from some little boat in McCovey Cove.
Greg Papa isn’t very good, but he sounds a lot better when he does a game with Kruk than he did when he worked with Ray Fosse. Fosse and Papa were about as dry and boring as any team I have ever heard. Listening to them is one of the reasons I think Kruk and Kuip are so good.
Say what you want about Papa, but he was boss-bitchin’ at doing Warriors games on the radio. I still miss him.
2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!
Greg Papa is great at football and basketball on the radio. It does not transfer to baseball.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 9, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Being a Chargers fan means being a Radiers hater. Admitting Papa is good at calling football would mean admitting something good about the Raiders. Won’t even consider it.
2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!
understood
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 9, 2008 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh, you know you wish you had Janikowsky
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by 




















