McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Doug Flutie's Hail Mary, And Why College Sports Matter

Swing and a miss. He STRUCK him out!

Star-divide

Hopefully it's not off-color to say that it is Tim Lincecum's off-speed pitches that separate him from Matt Cain.  Because it is indeed the rainbow of pitches Tim employs that separates him from Matt.

As good as Tim's fastball is, Matt actually gets about half again as many swing-throughs as Tim.  Tim's 13% swing-through rate on fastballs is good, but Matt's 19% is even better. Matt's fastball is tougher to get wood on than even Tim's.

But the majority of Tim's strikeouts come on his secondary pitches, and it is easy to see why.  Tim's 34% swing-through rate on his curve is nearly twice that of Matt's 18%.  Tim doubles Matt on sliders, with a 49% swing-through rate to Matt's 24%.  And at 41% swing-throughs, Tim's change up is also well ahead of Matt's 24%.

It is with his secondary pitches that Tim sets himself above.

And while Matt's fastball is even harder to get wood on than Tim's, Matt has yielded a hit on 33% of balls put in play or out of the park on his fastballs, while Tim is slightly better at 30%. The big difference, though, is that batters have extra-base hits on 14% of the fastballs they hit against Matt, while Tim limits them to extra bases on just 8% of the fastballs batters put into play or out of the park.

On all pitches, Tim has limited batters to that same 8% extra base rate, while Matt is at 15% overall.  This has provided Tim perhaps his greatest advantage over Matt -- the ability to limit extra bases.

Batters have increased their .236 batting average against Tim by only 87 points in achieving a mere .323 slugging percentage.  Matt has allowed his .240 batting average against to soar by 164 points in allowing batters a .404 SLG.  Tim has allowed just 26 extra-base hits, just five of them home runs.  Matt has yielded 42 extra-base hits including a dozen homers.

Both Tim and Matt are hard to hit, but Tim is much harder to hit with power.  Perhaps that is because Tim's great off-speed pitches make it harder for batters to get wood on the ball, allowing Tim a 24% overall swing-through rate to Matt's 17%.

Matt is tough to hit.  Tim is VERY tough to hit.  That is why even though Matt beat Tim to the majors by 20 months, Tim has beaten Matt to the All-Star game.  Apparently Tim won't be starting the All-Star game.  But he has outpitched Brandon Webb, the man who will be.

Oh, and he also gets more swing-throughs than Brandon.

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs  |  Comment 61 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hooray for Matt Cain vs. Tim Lincecum!

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 6, 2008 11:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Seriously

I’m kind of torn about this because yeah, it’s interesting information, but I am so sick of nothing but unfavorable comparisons between Matt and Tim.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unfavorable comparisons are one thing…but just look who I adopted! Do you have any ideas how many times I’ve contemplated how I can ‘off my own son? I’m leaning towards putting him in a burlap sack and throwing him into a river at this point.

Adoptive papa to Omar...so basically I'm screwed.

by PacBellBoozer on Jul 6, 2008 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hey I picked up Castillo, when he came off the clearance rack. least you got a potential HoFer.

Castillo hits doubles.

by kennv on Jul 6, 2008 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It just gets me because… yeah, Tim is OBVIOUSLY a better pitcher than Matt… I think most people here would agree with that without blinking… I would, and I’m one of the biggest Cain boosters around… but why does that have to be the POINT of conversation when either of these guys comes up?

I don’t know. It’s like going to the cheesecake factory and getting delicious cheesecake, but then spending the whole time talking about how you liked the cheesecake you had last time better. Can’t you simply enjoy ONE independently of the OTHER?

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 6, 2008 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think its that obvious that he’s a better pitcher. They’re about the same to me. Both throw hard, both have great stuff, both are young, both have nasty off-speed stuff.

Its like trying to argue who was the better Giant between Mays and Bonds, what’s the point? We should feel blessed to get to watch both.

by Hobbes2d on Jul 6, 2008 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Matt Cain Doesn't Suck!

Matt Cain clearly doesn’t suck as another poster (perhaps jokingly) stated. But if it isn’t obvious to you yet that Tim is an even better pitcher than Matt, I think it eventually will be.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Simply

I was simply answering a question that had been asked here a couple off weeks ago, back when I couldn’t find the information to answer it.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just a proud poppa about his adopted son.

I’m getting vistation rights. :)

by timmeh on Jul 6, 2008 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh I get it now. Tim’s the chocolate cheesecake that’s so good you can’t even describe it, and Cain is the New York style cheesecake with the raspberry stuff on top. Still very good, and suitable when you’re not in the mood for the unparalleled rich and delicious chocolate cheesecake.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 6, 2008 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe this is literally true.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 6, 2008 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Jonathan Sanchez is key lime pie.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 6, 2008 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

does this mean

Zito is mincemeat pie?

Proud pappa of....STEVE HOLM!!

by UnleashTheGore on Jul 7, 2008 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since both make me ill and I would immediately evict anyone who brought either into my house, yes.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 8:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Key Lime, or Zito? I’m so confused…

by tyrannoman on Jul 7, 2008 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zito. Key lime pie is one of my favorite desserts, but enigmatic. Meaning I can’t make it worth a diddly. Hence, Jonathan: good, but varies in goodness.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sanchez is The Flan-chise

You read it here first.

Fred Lewis can stand under my umbrella.

by S.F. Giangst on Jul 7, 2008 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This I love.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you do!

You have taste.

Fred Lewis can stand under my umbrella.

by S.F. Giangst on Jul 8, 2008 5:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great. Now I wanna go to the cheesecake factory. Though last time I was there it struck me that the New York style cheesecake is just never going to be the #1 cheesecake we all hoped it will be.

..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.

by Cookyman on Jul 7, 2008 4:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really though can you fault the NY cheesecake for being an outstanding second option?

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 7:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

THIRD CHEESECAKE AT BEST

AT BEST!!!

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 7, 2008 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess we gotta trade it for a dessert to be named later.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

David Eckstein Parfait

Billy Hayes: His job is better than yours.

by delorean on Jul 7, 2008 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Served with extra barf on the side.

"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 7, 2008 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’d rather have a side of grits.

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jul 7, 2008 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Same difference.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 7, 2008 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unfavorable is bad?

All one has to do is look at Tim’s 2.49 ERA compared to Matt’s 4.13 to realize one would have to stretch the truth to make a FAVORABLE comparison of Matt to Tim. And my goal is to find the truth, not stretch it.

I did show that on fastballs Matt gets half again as many swing-throughs as Tim. You didn’t know that before and probably wouldn’t even have guessed it. But it is true according to PITCH/fx stats compiled by Josh Kalk.

If you’re sick of unfavorable comparisons between the two, there is one way for Matt to change them. All he has to do is pitch a lot better.

I have made the point that since his horrendous start on April 18th, when Matt gave up a career-worst nine earned runs, he has actually pitched well, with an ERA in the 3.50 range and an impressive 2.75 K/BB ratio.

I think the world of Matt Cain, but I can’t make a silk purse out of a cow’s ear. In actuality, it hasn’t been so much that Matt has been bad as that Tim has been exceptional.

I predicted Tim would have a breakout season this year, and so far that has most certainly been the case. I am now going to predict that Matt Cain’s ERA will improve by at LEAST a full run from the season’s first half (through the end of June) and its second half.

I don’t expect it, but it’s not impossible that Matt would outpitch Tim the second half. He has so far. :)

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

THE POINT IS THAT THERE’S NO NEED TO COMPARE THEM. You can discuss Tim Lincecum without saying “BTW, MATT CAIN ISN’T AS GOOD AS HE IS.”

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Answering

Just answering a question.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+ friggin' 1

how bout we start comparing Timmy to Cole Hamels? Or Edinson Volquez? Or Joba Chamberlain?

We get it already, rog. You’ve made your point. Matt Cain isn’t worthy to even be in the same room as Lincecum, let alone the same discussion. Can we move on now and just like both of them because they both happen to be on our favorite team? Please?

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on Jul 6, 2008 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In actuality, it hasn’t been so much that Matt has been bad as that Tim has been exceptional.

I think this is the essence of what people are getting annoyed at. If Matt hasn’t been bad, then there is no reason to constantly point out that he’s not as good as Tim Lincecum.

And if the intention isn’t to use Tim Lincecum as a reference point to highlight Matt Cain’s failings, why would we need to use Matt Cain as a reference point to highlight Tim Lincecum’s awesomeness? And if there is no reason for it, why do it considering it just makes Matt Cain look bad in comparison.

They don’t need to be compared and contrasted all of the time. That’s all.

Only 885 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jul 6, 2008 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again

Just answering a question.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That might have been clearer...

If, y’know, you’d posted it in the same thread as the question.

Or referenced the question anywhere in the post.

Just saying…

SFDugout.com is BACK! See the Top 50 Giants Prospects!

by BruteSentiment on Jul 6, 2008 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

WE GET IT

You like Tim Lincecum.

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jul 6, 2008 11:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

In actuality

In actuality, I posted this because a couple of weeks ago someone said it would be nice to compare the swing-through rates for Tim and Matt. At that time I couldn’t find them. A couple of days ago I did.

I think it was pretty clear I liked Tim Lincecum well before I posted these facts. Heck, I’ve really liked him for two years now and nearly that long ago predicted he would be as good as he has been thus far. It has been nearly two years ago that I saw that grainy 41-second video of Tim on the internet and immediately believed I had witnessed greatness.

But regardless of how it turns out for Tim, I try to be honest and fair. Who else has told you that Matt gets a LOT more swing-throughs with his fastball than Tim does? Who knew? :)

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps if you had mentioned this is your post, it would have helped.

Because without this information it just seemed like another random Matt Cain vs. Tim Lincecum fanpost.

Only 885 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jul 6, 2008 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

You make a good—and ironic point.

I actually nearly completed the post with an opening paragraph that essentially apologized for my not being able to adequately answer the question of comparative swing-throughs when the question first came up. Then while searching for data to complete my last paragraph, I inadvertently erased the whole thing, mistakenly exiting out of The McCovey Chronicles.

I was very upset to have wasted so much time, but I felt at least it did give me a shot at writing a better “lead.” In retrospect, I wish I hadn’t screwed up the original post for TWO reasons now.

Don’t forget now, Matt gets more swing-throughs with his fastball than Tim does. And not by a little. And don’t forget that since April 18th, Matt has pitched well. Nor that I predict he will have a good second half.

Who IS that Tim Lincecum guy? :)

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what?? no mention of barry zito!? HE HAD 10 STRIKEOUTS!! =P

If my head is full of white hairs by the end of this season.. I blame Brian Wilson. (I'm only 22, dammit!)

by GiNgiNxbOi on Jul 6, 2008 11:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t you have written this post simply celebrating Lincecum’s season and his probably All Star berth without bringing Cain into it?

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 11:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think if we all just admit Matt Cain sucks, we’ll be alright. It’ll all go away.

Matt Cain sucks, BTW.

Adopted Giant: Randy Winn.

by Punch Rockgroin on Jul 6, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Matt Cain sucks

..but I love his fastball movement.

Though Jonathan Sanchez’s is pretty good hisself.

by wcw on Jul 6, 2008 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You misunderstood

The post wasn’t to celebrate Tim’s season. If that had been my goal, I would have approached the post differently. The goal of the post was to provide swing-through information—which unfortunately I couldn’t find when swing-throughs were a topic here.

If I had indeed been celebrating Tim’s fine season, names such as Volquez, Webb and Santana would have been far more likely as comparisons than Cain.

By the way, I have been to Germantown, the suburb of Memphis in which Matt grew up. Life is a lot different there than it is in the Bay Area. Less of an adjustment for Tim to leave Renton, Washington, where Jimi Hendrix grew up and is buried.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, I guess that’s fair enough. I think it’s just come at a bad time, because I know that a few of us here (coughmyselfandhowtheyscoredcough) are kind of sick of posts comparing Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum, especially since there always seems to be an undercurrent of “why isn’t Matt as good as Tim yet?” which is ridiculous because Tim is having a truly insane season so far.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Expectations

I think it is possible our expectations might be a little off.

When I first heard the Giants had drafted Matt, I went to gomemphis.com to see if there was any local news that would show how likely it was that Matt would sign. His potential college coach at the University of Memphis was quoted as saying Matt couldn’t turn down that first-round money. I immediately stopped worrying about whether Matt would sign.

I followed Matt but not closely until he made his major league debut in August of 2005. My comment after watching his first start against the Rockies was that he might not induce enough swing-throughs to be a true #1 starter and might be “only” a #2. Needless to say, that wasn’t a popular comment at that time, although many more would agree with it now.

Likewise I scarcely knew of Tim before the Giants drafted him. But since he was the highest draft choice they had had in years, I thought I should find out a little about him. And the more I learned, the more I liked!

As far as I know, I had the pleasure of seeing in person more of Tim’s minor league career than anyone aside from Tim himself. All it took was a little driving. Well, a LOT of driving, actually, particularly when I made the three-hour drive to Fresno once only to find out the game had been rained out 45 minutes earlier.

The difference between the two isn’t as much as this makes it seem, but one might better compare proper expectations for the two by realizing that Tims’ ERA in five starts for Fresno (0.29) was more than FOUR runs lower than Matt’s ERA there (4.39). Matt was about two and a half years younger than Tim when he pitched for Fresno, so as I mentioned, the difference isn’t nearly THAT much.

But I think those who are disappointed in Matt may have set their expectations too high. I expect Matt to improve from here, but as good as I think he will become, I think Tim will continue to be even better more often than not.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that it’s the result of expectations that were too high.

I really think this fanpost would have come across better if you’d just said that you were answering a question to begin with, because as other have said, as is, it seems like another “Tim Lincecum is awesome, btw, Matt Cain isn’t as good” fanpost.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey Rog, are you using PFX for your swing-through %’s?

by xanthan on Jul 6, 2008 12:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Yes, PITCH/fx, as compiled by Josh Kalk, it was. By the way, Xanthan, you have done some very, very nice work with PITCH/fx. Keep it up!

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So this what it feels like to read fellatio?

Billy Ripken is not a fuck face

by Karlifornia on Jul 6, 2008 12:29 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I could be mistaken.

I could be mistaken, but that doesn’t seem like an appropriate remark. There might be children here.

by sharksrog on Jul 6, 2008 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2008/7/6/565728/completely-delusional

There are.

NL West TempestTeapot - An ENTIRE DIVISION under .500!

by victor frankenstein on Jul 6, 2008 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he totally got him :(

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 2:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm delusional, btw

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

also I'm posting in the wrong thread

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL me

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 6, 2008 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hey sharksrog

i always appreciate your well thought out analysis and your passion for “the franchise”. please keep up the good work…its fun to read.

LiNcEcuM and cAiN R STUDS

by z4 landshark on Jul 6, 2008 5:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Thanks for the nice comments, Land Shark.

I do understand how people can be upset by the constant comparison of Cain and Lincecum. As much as I like Tim, I felt really sorry for Matt when the Chronicle did an article about a month and a half into the season showing that Tim had won more games than the other Giants starters combined.

I was a little disappointed in Matt’s performance today, but he didn’t have the best of luck, and he hurt himself by not covering first base (as did Lincecum a couple of starts ago). I’m still expecting a fine second half from Matt. Heck, I’m even in Barry Zito’s camp for the moment. Like almost everyone else, I have been sold on Jonathan Sanchez for quite a while not, and I still like Kevin Correia.

I read on another board that since he isn’t starting the All-Star game, Tim will start twice more for the Giants prior to the break. That would mean Tuesday and a week from today, which I would presume means that Correia will be skipped if the Tim-starting-twice thing is true.

by sharksrog on Jul 7, 2008 12:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Who cares about these two fuckwads.

I want to know what Zito’s swingthrough % the other night on curveballs was ;)

Eugeniooooooo!!!!

by FairweatherFan on Jul 7, 2008 8:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Affeldt_small
McCovey Chronicles Christmas Cards
Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Candlestick_small
What This Giants Fan is Thankful For
Ralphie_small
Rank Your Giants Prospects
Img_3997_small
Brett Pill tearing up Venezuela...Bowker apparently scared of the country and going home
Small
Lincecum's Ks - A Very Basic Question on Judgement of Pitching Savvy
Small
Could the Giants get any Compensation Picks?
Shadow_grad_small
We're interested in Uggla...
Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S