McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

What do we do with all our pitching?

I was thinking back to this last offseason where we were all excited about what talent we would bring back when we traded our huge surplus of pitching.  We now know that that huge surplus of pitching would turn into somewhat of a deficit of pitching when Noah Lowry went down with an injury that could very well end his career and when Correia when down with that oblique strain and we had nobody to replace him with.  I was thinking that maybe we might be able to actually fully rebuild our team by trading the new huge surplus of pitching we are about to have sometime soon. 

Our current rotation is Lincecum/Cain/Sanchez/Correia/Zito.  On the way up to the majors we have MadBum, Tim Alderson, and Henry Sosa, all of whom will most likely reach the majors at some point.  We also have a bunch of not-as-good prospects like Clayton Tanner, Ben Snyder, Kevin Pucetas, Jesse English, etc.  I think it's safe to assume one of those guys will mature into a servicable starter at some point.  Maybe more than one of them will.  Also, there is a slim chance Lowry might come back from his injury.  But once that happens, how do we get them into the rotation?  If we have 7 or 8 pitchers ready to take a spot in the rotation, we can afford to get ride of a couple to get the younger ones in.  This is a great problem to have because good starters are very valuable and can draw a lot of return in a trade.  That's just the thing a team like the Giants need to help the rebuilding process.  We can use some of our starters to get us some quality hitters, which would round out our team enough to be able to compete again.  But who would we trade?

Lincecum is our ace, and we couldn't afford to lose him, so I would think he's off limits.  Zito and his fatass contract are here to stay whether we like it or not.  Cain is extremely good and could draw a good amount of return, but I'd really hate to see him go.  Sanchez could draw more return than Cain right now because he's been stellar this year, and he still has more potential that he can still fulfill.  Correia has been pretty good as a starter, and he also has more value because he can be used as a reliever.  He wouldn't draw the same amount as any of our big three, but he is definitely the most expendable of our starters (excluding Zito because we can't get rid of him)  Who should we trade later on when our pitching prospects become major league-ready?

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs  |  Comment 58 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

My suggestion

My suggestion would be to hope that the Giants DO wind up with eight or nine starting-caliber pitchers at some point.

If they truly have that many, trade one of the starters who is proven for something of value and open up a spot for the youngster. If the youngster fails, one of the other prospects should soon be ready to take his place. And if the youngster succeeds, start the process of trading an established pitcher (perhaps the first youngster if appropriate) for something of value and to open up a spot for the next guy.

Isn’t this sort of what the A’s have been doing for years? It seems to have worked out rather well for them.

by sharksrog on Jul 2, 2008 10:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The logical solution: 10 man starting rotation.

Everybody Loves Durham
comics | cartoons | Nattowear

by Natto on Jul 2, 2008 10:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Per start: 200-pitch limit

by Moggeee on Jul 2, 2008 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would rather clone Timmy 5 times

by ACgiant97 on Jul 3, 2008 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Numbers don't work

Very good chance that at least one of MadBum, Alderson, Sosa will flame out. By the time one of them is ready, very good chance that one of Timmeh, Matteh, Kevveh or Jonnej will flame out or suffer a career-ending or -stifling injury.

It’s simple probability. You’ve got a small chance of putting an Atlantean “Four Aces” staff together. You’ve got a somewhat better chance of having a very good rotation and a respectable bullpen. You’ve got almost no chance of having Four Aces plus extras that will bring many meaningful returns.

The good probability play in terms of overall resource management (and there will be blood!) would be to package Lincecum and Zito now in return for essentially nothing in return. The team that gets them takes on the burden of overpaying a 5th starter, but gets an elite starter for practically nothing for several more years.

Meanwhile the Giants could go with Cain/Sanchez/Correia/Misch/dirt and just suffer, until they can repurpose the money wasted on Zito to get two decent bats or one decent bat and a serviceable back-of-the-rotation FA starter, until the next elite starter is ready for MLB.

Adding bats with the Zito money at least gives you a chance to win games that the pretty decent core of starters keep close most of the time (in theory).

You just need to 1) find a way to get Zito to agree to the trade, and 2) find the right club to deal with, and 3) have the guts to do it. When you remove a cancer sometimes some healthy tissue has to go with it.

Fred Lewis can stand under my umbrella.

by S.F. Giangst on Jul 2, 2008 11:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That is pretty much the worst idea I’ve heard all year. Unless your goal is to have AT&T Park torn down by an angry pitchfork-carrying mob. In that case, it’s a great idea.

The All-Father is now a Giant!

by EliminateMe on Jul 2, 2008 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

....are you by any chance 2008 MLB Draft?

because that’s possibly the fucking dumbest idea I’ve ever heard.

by boonitez on Jul 3, 2008 12:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

The idea is great because you already gave up on it.

"Forget it Donny, you're out of you're element"-Walter Sobchak

by icanplaythird on Jul 3, 2008 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

You’re a funny guy.

Everybody Loves Durham
comics | cartoons | Nattowear

by Natto on Jul 3, 2008 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve heard this “You can have Lincecum… IF YOU TAKE ZITO BWAHAHAHA” trade proposal before… and I just… is there even a remote chance that Major League General Manager could make that call and not get laughed at?

But furthermore, has there EVER been a trade that works this way? Does anybody have a single example of any trade that has ever happened where a team actually agreed to a +5/-5 package deal? The problem is that in this kind of a scenario, the value of the trade return is not coming from the other team involved. This trade IS “Trading Lincecum for not having Zito.” This is how anybody who is the second party to this proposal would view it.

If Sabean brought this up to anybody, they would look at it this way: “He’s giving us Lincecum so that we’ll take Zito. He is NOT giving us Lincecum so that he can receive one of our players. The value of this trade for the Giants is not within our system. With that in mind, I am not obligated to give up anything of value for the respective returns for both teams to be equal. The value of the Giants return lies in getting rid of Zito. The value of my return lies in adding Lincecum. To maintain this balance, all we will give up is Joe Von SingleAForLife. End transaction.”

And that’s a SHIT transaction, from every angle.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 3, 2008 3:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Yankees might do it

To them it is Lincecum for 4 years at 20 mill a year.

by positiveuphemism on Jul 3, 2008 7:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not saying that another team wouldn’t do it, but even the Yankees wouldn’t GIVE us anything for it. The other team is only going to ever give us what we’re seeking in return for the trade, and THAT trade is seeking “not having Zito” in return for itself.

Does anybody think that Lincecum is worth not having Zito? Because that’s ALL we could possibly get from this trade. And it’s awful.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 3, 2008 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the sort of post

that makes me wish we could ignore certain users.

by positiveuphemism on Jul 3, 2008 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jul 3, 2008 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 facts you don't either ingored or did not consider.
Adding bats with the Zito money at least gives you a chance to win games that the pretty decent core of starters keep close most of the time (in theory).

1) Hmm like Jaun Piere? Sarge Jr? In case you have not noticed not many bats hitting the Free Agent market to go "buy" in the last 4 years. And not many appear heading to it in not couple years later. Rowand is probably the best type to be available that will sign with SF currently. At least tell the team has 4-5 better then good arms established in the league. Then others might consider using their few years of highly develop talent while being able to control their destiny in SF because we would offer a real chance at a ring.

2) As for the ” 5 Almost Non Scrubs as starters will work” delusion I am going to keeping asking you guys this one simple question tell you have a rational logical counter point. - If 5 Almost Non Scrubs as starters and a powerful line up get you a ring then Explain to me why the Giants have never won a W.S. and the Reds only 1 since the Big Red machine? And even the Big Red Machine had to have 3 damn good starters to win it.

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on Jul 3, 2008 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is an almost unbelievably silly proposal

because in free agent market value, Lincecum is easily worth the money that Zito is being paid. The fact that said money is being paid to the wrong player is unjust but irrelevant.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jul 3, 2008 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its not a bad idea

The idea of ever getting rid of Lincecum just makes you sound like a dumbass but the idea of packaging a good player with zito makes some sense. If you could get a high paying teams redsox, tigers, yankees, angels, but most likely mets to take Zito who they wanted to begin with and throw in either Cain or Sanchez it could be good in the long run.

Black Raven

by Black Raven on Jul 3, 2008 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but giving up Cain/Sanchez/Lincecum solely so we can get rid of Zito?

Hell to the no.

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 3, 2008 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, it doesn’t make sense. Packaging Zito with another player is the same as trading a good player for the right to not have Zito anymore. That’s a trade with yourself. You don’t trade with yourself on that level. You trade with other teams. It makes sense to package like that with MUCH smaller packages, where the value of getting something back is more approximate to the value of shedding the package, but this one would be on a scale that just can’t be reconciled.

At least in my opinion.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 3, 2008 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is like one of those old late nigth tv spot were you can buy a gatget for $299 or “only 8 easy payments of $59 each!”. Never take the easy payment plan.

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on Jul 4, 2008 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ARE YOU ACTUALLY INSANE?

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 3, 2008 12:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

whoops that was meant to be in reply to SF Giangst

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 3, 2008 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know that this just is not how it works, but there are pieces on this team that in an idea world would be moved before ANY of our pitchers get moved (Zito aside, because even in an ideal world he’s pretty untradeable).

Because I choose to live in my unrealistic, idealized trade world where trades necessarily happen in the order in which I feel they are most pressing, if ANY of Cain, Lincecum, Sanchez, Correia, or the “legit pitching prospect” brood get moved BEFORE all of Molina, Durham, Roberts, Winn, Aurilia, and Vizquel, I’m going to have to shoot a bitch.

Because seriously, if we get out of this year and we’ve traded Cain/Lincecum’Sanchez/etc., but still have Roberts, Molina, Winn, and Aurilia… wouldn’t you shoot a bitch, regardless of what we got back in return?

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jul 3, 2008 3:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Especially if we got nothing back in return except the HOPE of being able to sign some offensive free agents in the offseason that will make an impact.

by paboperfecto on Jul 3, 2008 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Putting aside the notion that a team with serious thoughts of contending should really have 6 or 7 viable starting options going into a season (as the Red Sox have shown quite wisely the last couple of years), the idea that we’re in line for a giant surplus of plus starting pitchers seems based on some dicey assumptions to me. It’s either suspending the space-time continuum or it’s making some bold contractual judgements. (Of course it’s also pretty much dismissing major injury flame-outs, but the less said about that the better).

Bumgarner is currently having a dominating first year, but is at the lowest full season level. Tim Alderson is a rung higher, but isn’t having near as dominating a season. If I suggested that both of these kids could come to ST in 2011 with a chance ot pitch their way onto the roster, I wouldn’t be making a conservative statement—quite the contrary that would be a hugely liberal, pie-in-the-sky optimistic scenario. Nonetheless, let’s assume it’s true. Henry Sosa is older and a little more experienced, but the Giants seem in little mood to rush him, and a year of seasoning at AA and AAA wouldn’t hurt him any. Let’s assume a few successful spot starts for Henry in 2010 and he too has a chance ot win a spot in the rotation in ST 2011.

Ok, so who’s here at that point to block them? Let’s assume Lincecum, Sanchez, and Zito (ugh!).

IF Noah Lowry somehow manages to come back and pitch next year (and nothing so far in his rehab suggests he will), the club still has to pick up a $6.25 million option to bring him back in 2010, after which he’s a FA. One way or another, I can’t see him in the mix in 2011.

Kevin Correia entered this year with 3.027 of major league service time. He was eligible for arbitration this winter, but signed a one-year deal to avoid it. My math tells me that that should mean he’s eligible to become a FA following the 2010 season. Correia is certainly a serviceble guy to have around, but I personally don’t want to be paying him market rates for a starter - not really even market rates with a hometown discount - particularly if other guys are coming up the system and ready to step in. If none of the kids are quite ready yet, then someone from the second group you named should be able to take over 5th starter duties. So Correia’s gone, too. (It’s possible my math is wrong and he doesn’t hit the market till 2011, in which case we could move him that winter or keep him around for a swing role, but the larger point still stands, his contract will remove him from the equation before long).

Now the big elephant. Matt Cain. In ST 2011 Matt is entering his walk year (certainly the Giants have exercised his $6.25 million club option). He’s only 26 and he’s a stud. Zambrano last year under pretty similar circumstances signed a 5 year $91 million deal, which I’d certainly jump on for Cain, though who knows where the pitching market will go in the next three years. Sabathia will be a good test case this offseason as he’ll be 28 next year. I think an agent worth his salt will have a two-tier scenario for a stud 26 year old pitcher: 1) try to lock him up for 10 years; 2) take a 5 year deal for a larger annual figure in hopes that the market will continue to soar and he can grab another huge payday at 31. Either way, the daily soap opera story of the 2010/11 offseason will be can we resign Cain or do we need to move him by the deadline. It seems dubious that this story will be settled by Opening Day 2011. We’ll probably head into the season with uncertainty (unless we’ve already moved him as the winter’s big catch).

And once we’ve dealt with the contracts, I don’t see that we’ve got that much pitching. We have hopefully two studs and one Zito (who we’re praying is pitching effectively enough to ship him to the mound every 5 days with sending too much of a signal to every player in the organization that winning isn’t our #1 priority). We have some high-ceiling but untested rookies who’ve been rushed through the system. And we have a group of C level prospects who hopefully include two or three guys who can be effective back-end starters.

It’s really these guys (Misch, Snyder, Pucetas, English, being the best of them, then Martinez, Cowart? Perreira?) who account for the “surplus” and while it’s not unimagineable that there are some future major league starters in that group, if we don’t use them that way ourselves I can’t see that there’s a big market for trade for this level of prospect. These guys are throw ins, or fodder for role player deals (I’ll take your middle relief arm, you get my C level AAA starter). They aren’t the basis for deals that really impact our lineup and they certainly don’t appear to me to be valuable enough to replace a Lincecum/Cain or even Sanchez.

So I’m back where I started. I’m happy with our organizational starting pitching depth, because it could give us flexibility to replace the people who move on via contract status or injury, but I don’t really see a major surplus that we can be digging into liberally for big-time trades that will really affect our lineup.

My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.

by Roger on Jul 3, 2008 6:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Roger put it all well. I was going to write “It’s too early to decide what to do with ‘all our pitching’. The prospects need to be actually banging on the door to the bigs, and the contracts for Cain, Sanchez and Lincecum need to be considered on 2010-2012. That is not to say that a deal sending away Pucetas (for example) for a hitting prospect at the same level, shouldn’t be done, or other great deals considered. But building off what Howie said above – trade those vets before you trade the heart of the current and future Giants.”

Castillo hits doubles.

by kennv on Jul 3, 2008 6:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very astute

Get to where the A’s or Rays are in terms of pitching prospect depth, and you can start thinking about shopping pitching for hitting upgrades (although ironically Tampa just traded hitting for pitching last offseason—then again, the way Young is playing, it looks more like lemons-for-pitching). It still gives me the willies, as an A’s fan, to think about trading Trevor Cahill or Huston Street for a hitting upgrade, but it makes some sense on a logical level.

The Giants just are not there, or close to it. It’s hard to get that level of depth. The A’s got it artificially through trading 2 very good players for prospects. The Rays got it by having one of the most unbelievably awesome drafts in recent memory. That ain’t easy to do.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jul 3, 2008 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

$91 million

If Matt is worth $91 million over five years, what is Tim likely to be worth?

by sharksrog on Jul 3, 2008 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some thoughts

Nice run down overall. Here are some of my follow-up points.

About MadBum and Alderson, the key point is that they are dominating hitters who are 4-5 years older than they are, who are physically more mature and that much more experienced. I think they can make the majors in late 2010, much like Cain did, assuming there is an open rotation spot. Of course, injury could take one or both, but if they stay healthy, I don’t think that is too outrageous a statement given how well they are doing in the minors, particularly compared with how Cain started out as an 18 year old.

The reason the Giants were in no mood to rush Sosa this season is because they rushed him last season and he had been out with an injury for the first 6-8 weeks of the season. And he didn’t show last season that he had Advanced A figured out, so it makes sense that they are going to leave him in San Jose first thing. Had he pitched most of the season and did as well as he is currently doing, instead of starting on the DL, I would bet that he got promoted.

All together, while they are low are the rungs of the minor league system, so was Sanchez when he made his breakout and make the majors pretty soon after that. I think they are ready to compete by ST 2011 at minimum, because they have all shown above average abilities to get hitters out, even if it is at lower levels.

And who is being rushed? The flip side of TINSTAAPP is that once you stop being a thrower, you leapfrog prospect-ville and become a pitcher. It is not rushing if their stuff is ready to pitch in the majors. Otherwise, as the creator of TINSTAAPP said, you are wasting another pitch in the minors, wasting his body that gets that much closer to injury.

People like to point at Sanchez as a rush job, but when you are striking out MLB batters at such a high rate, he obviously has the stuff to pitch in the majors. Do you waste his pitches down in the minors facing mostly hitters who would never see an MLB dugout or let him face actual major leaguers and learn his craft up in the majors?

As I wrote below, it is way too early to trade off pitching, but not for the reasons Roger states. Basically, we don’t really have any surplus yet. As Roger astutedly noted, the minor leaguers are too low to state categorically that they will make it. Many think they look good but until then, you can only count the bird in your hand, not the birds in the tree. So we have no surplus right now, no square to spare.

The key word here is patience. We are in re-building mode. Trading any of our young pitchers now, unless it is an unbelievable offer, could just end up shooting ourselves in the foot, by any sort of different ways, like filling a position that would have gotten filled by one of our prospects by the time we are legitimately ready to compete again, or trading away what we thought was surplus when injuries take away what you thought you had when again we are ready to compete again.

Until then, as I said at the beginning of this season, enjoy the positives, brush off the negatives as learning experiences, hope for the future, and mostly: Go Giants!

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 3, 2008 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm slightly confused Martin

You said it’s too early to trade off pitching, but not for the reasons Roger states. Then you said, basically we don’t really have any surplus yet—which is exactly the reason I stated (I went on to doubt whether we were really going to have one in the foreseeable future as well, but still, the first reason stands). So, I guess, thanks for agreeing with me?

My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.

by Roger on Jul 3, 2008 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The way my brilliant mind works

I think we should trade Cain. Well, not today, he just pitched a phenomenal game! If he has a bad game, we trade him then! In the meantime, Cain’s the greatest pitcher!

In all seriousness, I still wouldn’t trade Cain, Lincecum or Sanchez. I know anyone can make an argument about getting hitters for any of the three, but… I just wouldn’t do it. Now if MadBum, Alderson, or Sosa makes it to the bigs and is as good as advertised, I’d consider trading someone. Just not Lincecum. I’m just attached to our young pitching.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jul 3, 2008 8:04 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The Only Buy This Trade Deadline I Would Make

A couple of good but not great minor-league arms - say Ben Snyder and Wilber Bucardo - for Adrian Beltre.

Beltre fills the one position for which we have no internal candidates at all. If lightning strikes and the team looks like a contender for 2009, he gives us a big boost. His contract is up at the end of that year, and we can either try to resign him or let him walk and take the draft picks.

And he saves us from further Jose Castillo.

by Evan on Jul 3, 2008 8:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good trade idea. I’d support that. Of course, I supported the Durham for Sexon rumor this offseason, so I’m not real brite…

by tyrannoman on Jul 3, 2008 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget

Pablito played 3B in the NWL. Believe he was a league All Star at the position even.

My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.

by Roger on Jul 3, 2008 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He or Nate would be great choices for third!

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.

by jponry on Jul 3, 2008 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can play third!

"Forget it Donny, you're out of you're element"-Walter Sobchak

by icanplaythird on Jul 3, 2008 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and if he walks Beltre would be worth at least an extra Draft pick. Maybe 2.
But who knows what the Mariners are going to do. They probably not even know at this point.

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on Jul 3, 2008 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beltre is a Mariner

They never walk.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jul 3, 2008 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

*golf clap*

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on Jul 3, 2008 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bonus: Beltre wants to be a Giant

I mean, why else would he be swinging an orange and black bat? (And the answer is not, ‘because he loves Baltimore crab cakes.’)

Proud new parent of Mr. Buster Posey... you know, if he signs and stuff.

by GiantsFanInExile on Jul 3, 2008 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chad Tracy

I think Chad Tracy would be a better option than Beltre. Smaller upside, but better probability IMO, and at a lesser salary.

If the D-Backs are really looking for OF, a Winn/Tracy trade would make a lot of sense. I think it would benefit the Giants to pay Winn’s salary if AZ agreed to pay Tracy’s (difference of about $4m) because it allows the Giants to open up RF to either Nate or Bowker.

A combination of Tracy and Castillo at 3B could be relatively productive until Gillaspie or Rohlinger could potentially be ready in 2010.

by aGIANTfan on Jul 3, 2008 9:36 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I’ve heard that post-surgery Tracy has limited mobility and should, by all rights, be transitioned into a full-time 1B. I don’t think he’s our solution for the hot corner.

Proud new parent of Mr. Buster Posey... you know, if he signs and stuff.

by GiantsFanInExile on Jul 3, 2008 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At some point

It’s likely the Giants are going to have to trade one of Lincecum, Cain, Sanchez, Alderson, Bumgarner or Sosa. Take your pick because one of them must be traded. Getting two late first round/early second round picks for one of the first three just won’t cut it. And in a couple of years the first three are going to get mighty expensive. At which point there will be several other pitchers knocking on the door. Giants management just has to figure out when and where and for whom.

Only 888 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jul 3, 2008 9:58 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not

It may be prudent to trade one of the “Big Six” you mentioned, but it may not be necessary. A single injury or a move to the bullpen for say Alderson or Sosa could preclude the necessity.

by sharksrog on Jul 3, 2008 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's hang on to the Big Three

until we are sure we have qualified replacements. No use trading a#1, #2 or #3 starter and plugging in a #5-quality arm. You might improve your offense but only weaken your starting staff and further tax the bullpen. That means we wait a year or two to see how the Little Three develop.

It’s much to early to say for sure, but it seems the Giants are likely to be picking in the top ten in the 2009 draft, although it is pretty obvious they will not be the worst team in baseball (goodbye, Stephen Strasburg, we hardly knew ye). But since the bulk of this year’s top ten college sophomores are pitchers and the 2009 draft seems short on position players even at the high school level, there is the possibility we could be adding even more arms to the system next year. Let’s see how things go in 2009 so we can know if there will be a Baby Three to replace the Little Three, perhaps rendering the latter three as good additional bargaining chips.

by baseballjunkie on Jul 3, 2008 11:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Gaps within organizational pitching

Love the 3 Stooges (Lincecum, Cain and Sanchez). Am concerned with the gaps between the ML pitching talent and the next wave which is at A ball, leaving AAA and AA almost completely bare of starting pitching prospects. Another gap that could materialize is below A and the lack of pitchers drafted in 2008. Will the SF Giants find a Jonathan Sanchez from their 2008 draft?

by wilriv21 on Jul 3, 2008 11:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Love the 3 Stooges (Lincecum, Cain and Sanchez).

Great stuff. So does that makes Zito Shep?

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on Jul 3, 2008 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zito is Zeppo Marx.

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jul 3, 2008 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Merkin Valdez

SF should also consider Merkin Valdez for the starting rotation. He is long past his TJ surgery and could develop into a top flight starter. I know he has been injured but it could be possibly the same way way Jonathan Sanchez became an injury risk after

by wilriv21 on Jul 3, 2008 11:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

he was sent to the bullpen and was pitching on a different schedule than during his starting days. Let Valdez come to camp in 2009 and vie for a starting role.

by wilriv21 on Jul 3, 2008 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the first thing that has to happen is...

Valdez getting healthy. He didn’t even survive a month of MLB pitching before getting shelved for a couple of months and still the end is not visible.

I think you have to have him relieve for a few years like Correia before anyone should think about starting him.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 3, 2008 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Easy answer

The Giants keep them all. You can never have too much pitching.

by Cainer on Jul 3, 2008 11:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Way too early to be trading off pitching

I would have been OK trading off Lowry the last couple of years, but no way we trade off anybody else yet, mainly because a trade right now won’t really help us do anything.

Zito is untradeable. Cain, Lincecum, and now Sanchez is probably the core going forward, so you cannot trade them either. Correia could be traded, but the value we get wouldn’t be worth what he can do for us as the #5 starter going forward. Same for most prospects we have in the minors, all our best ones are too far down to get much for their potential, the only ones close are not ranked that highly to get much value back in return.

Action does not make things better in this case. Patience is needed while re-building the team. Trading would just tear down a strength of the team while perhaps strengthening an area that doesn’t need strengthening in a few years when the team is ready to compete.

The time to be trading your best young players to fill holes on the team is when the other team makes an offer too rich to ignore (which almost never happens) or when you are close enough to winning that you can start making concrete tactical moves to shore up your weak areas.

Right now, a hole today might be filled by somebody, while a new more important hole might open up later. And as some noted, that hole could be in the rotation itself, via injury or lack of performance.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin "Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 3, 2008 3:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Timgoodavatar_small
Tim's misdemeanor charges have been dropped
Daisy_small
Human after all (Timmy)
Lincecum_small
Lukewarm Stove: The Beginning
Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards: Outstanding Newcomer
Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards IV

Recent FanPosts

Hatoyama-southpark_small
Which Old, Declining outfielder would you like?
Small
Who Should The Giants Acquire to Play OF In 2010?
Small
Time for a Semi-Rebuild?
Small
A REAL realistic view of Giants 2010
Olds1_small
Who will be behind the dish?
Small
Kevin Kouzmanoff: Cheap Power Upgrade
Lincecum_small
McCovey Awards: Best Non-gameday Image
Small
handful of "puzzle piece" options

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S