McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Sometimes the best moves are the one's that aren't made

Following the 2007 season it was hard to imagine a San Francisco Giant's lineup that didn't include Barry Bonds. How could be be successful? How can we possibly get younger and better without a catalyst in the lineup? These were the questions that plagued Giants fans in the winter and brought about many interesting trade scenarios.

Star-divide

After watching what most true baseball fans would call the best game of the season, the Giants fans are sure glad to still have Tim Lincecum on our side. After yet another stellar pitching performance the 23-year old right hander improves his record to 9-1, lowers his ERA to 2.38 and regains the National League lead in strikeouts with 114. As we sit back and bask in the glory of "The Franchise's" performance, I can't help but wonder what could have been.

Remember November of last year. It seems far away now, but think way back to when we were all worried about the direction the Giants would go in and how will Brian Sabean truly put a competitive team on the field. Many fans were calling for a fire sale with hopes of picking up middle of the road guys in their prime. Let's think back shall we...

There was a time when packaging Fred Lewis and Jonathan Sanchez for a third baseman like Joe Crede seemed like the best idea. I have no doubt that Sabean was looking for possible deals that would put the Giants in a position to have a better season than 2007. It's a darn good thing no one made the right offer. With the injury to Dave Roberts, Fred Lewis has quickly become one of the premier lead off men in the National League. After Saturday's game he is hitting .283 with 50 runs scored, 6 homeruns, 23 RBI, an OBP of .361 and he's even stolen 13 bases. This is a guy who could easily swipe 30 bags this year, hit .300 and even have 15 to 20 homeruns. Not to mention the fact that he'll probably score 100 runs. Not bad for a guy who seemed like he was pretty expendable after last season.

Jonathan Sanchez has come along much faster than anyone could have anticipated. There was a lot of hype around him last season but no one could seem to understand why. All that was ever said about was that he "has a live arm, and a lot of potential." After finishing 2007 with a record of 1-5 and an ERA close to 6.00. It's a wonder no one wanted him. However, he has quickly become the Giants best pitcher next to Lincecum. He enters his start on Sunday against the A's with a record of 7-4, an ERA of 3.98, and 96 strikeouts in 95 innings. That's good for 7th in the National League (Lincecum 1st with 114, Cain 6th with 97). And don't forget about the nearly 2/1 K/BB ratio. If he continues to grow at the rate he has, he will be a mainstay in the San Francisco Rotation for years to come.

Finally, the most important trade that didn't happen Lincecum to the Blue Jays for Alex Rios. I'll admit, I was very intrigued by this offer. I'm not suggesting that I didn't want Lincecum, only that Rios if quickly turning into a 5-tool superstar. Sabean has been criticized in past year for some of his trades but this is one that EVERY San Francisco Giants fan is happy he didn't make. This is a kid who has a chance to win a Cy Young this season, just his first full season in the majors, I'll take that over the development of an outfielder 7 days a week.

So as we near the mid way point of a season in which we were supposed to be cellar dwellers, we find ourselves in a position to compete with young guys who will continue to succeed. So jump on the Lincecum Express and be happy that his jersey still reads San Francisco.

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

1 recs  |  Comment 75 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well

The Giants are still an abysmal offensive team. This 1-run performance puts them at exactly 4 runs per game on the season. By a quirk of fate, there are actually two significantly worse offenses in the NL this season, the Nats and Pads. Historically speaking, however, 4 runs per game is a rancid performance. It’s notably worse than last year (4.22 R/G), and right on par with nearly Bondless 2005 season (4.01 R/G). I don’t see how they’re going to improve much on this front over the course of the season. Molina and Rowand have already seen significant dropoffs from their hot Mays, and I suspect that the former in particular still has alot more dropping to do. I also think that most would be disappointed if Winn weren’t moved by the deadline, which certainly wouldn’t help the offense in the second half.

I’m also strongly opposed to any sort of suggestion that the Giants are contenders. They aren’t.. This is a woeful team. They’re on pace to lose 92 games, and their run differential suggest that they’re actually a bit worse than that. We’ve fallen into this trap before: Just because the division is bad doesn’t mean a 90+ loss team is a contender. And 6 out at the halfway point isn’t “within reach”, it’s just on pace finish the season 12 back.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Jun 29, 2008 3:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hot Mays, you say? I think the Giants used to have one of those?

And yeah, contention =/= 2008 Giants.

Let’s get to .500 before we even start to THINK about considering contention. And since that’s just not going to happen, well… there you go.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 3:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what if

the dbacks fall even further back and we end up tied for first w/ them…but still 8 games or so under .500?

by positiveuphemism on Jun 29, 2008 3:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh, we can TALK about contention if that happens, but the actual structure of the team better damn well stay the course. “No irrational short term moves as long as we’re under .500!” That’s what my picket sign will say when I’m at the park hoping that we win the division against a bunch of team who are more than 5 games under .500, too..

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, let's not completely dismiss contention yet.

Let’s wait until we reach .500, and then completely dismiss contention.

DFA all Giants over 34 years old.

by Mayor of 311 on Jun 29, 2008 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree. I’m not proposing that the Giants will some how make a brilliant run and east into the post-season. I don’t think anyone is expecting that. But, I think that after the first week of the season when it seemed like they might lose 150 games, they have played far better than that. And its a little unfair to think that they’ll finish 12 back because they’re 6 back right now. They pulled within 5 games about 2 1/2 weeks ago, they swept the Diamondbacks the last time they played them, they’ve split some series with the Rockies, owned the Padres, and get another crack at the Dodgers this weekend. They may still very well finish far out of first but you can’t make the argument that many players have out done your expectations for them.

by adamcopes on Jun 29, 2008 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why can't I?

Molina, Castillo, Lewis, Sanchez, Aurelia, Durham even Lincecum have outperformed my expectations (I expected Linecum to be a legitimate #1 starter, not a short-list Cy young candidate).

Cain, Zito, Vizquel are the only ones significantly below expectations (not that my expectations for Zito and Vizquel were that high).

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Jun 29, 2008 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

EVERYBODY pwns the Blanks right now. (Giggles uncontrollably)

We need to show more offensive consistency before we should entertain ridiculous playoff notions.

NL West TempestTeapot - An ENTIRE DIVISION under .500!

by victor frankenstein on Jun 29, 2008 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If

If after the first week of the season you felt the Giants would lose 150 games, you are far too wishy-washy. At that time I still expected them to lose the same 95-97 games I expected before the season began.

While I felt it was possible the Giants would have their second 100-loss season in franchise history, I didn’t expect it to happen. Let ALONE 150 losses.

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why?

Why trade Jonathan Sanchez and Freddie Lewis for Joe Crede when your future is likely still four seasons away?

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just for funsies, I did a search to see if anybody ever suggested Lewis and Sanchez for Crede. Nobody ever did on this website, but BruteSentiment (in March 2007) did suggest Lewis and Sanchez for Josh Fields. Over a year later, and that trade would only be marginally more difficult to turn down…

I think your expectations for Lewis are pretty optimistic. He’s not likely to ever consistently hit for average much better than he is right now, he’s probably at best on the fringes of 15-20 power (which confuses me to no end because dude has a good body for power), and the numbers he has this year are buffered by what seems to be a very friendly platoon. Don’t get me wrong. I loves me some Lew, but he’d have some major growing to do to be the player you describe (in my personal opinion).

I think Sanchez has turned a lot of heads, not only with how little time it took him to lock in (which was great), but particularly (and perhaps this is again just a personal thing) with his health. He hasn’t missed a start. He hasn’t been on any short pitch counts. He hasn’t had any soreness. There’s still half a season to go, and the health of his arm will probably always scare me, but with each week the “predictions” of doom and gloom that I was bandying about pre-season become and less and less relevant. I’ll take two full consecutive seasons of generally good health before I let him fall off of my “don’t be surprised when his arm falls off” list, but he’s gotten to the point where I’m not surprised that his arm ISN’T falling off, and that’s something.

I’m not sure that most people here ever thought it would be reasonable to give up that much for a guy like Crede. Like I said, the closest I found was over a year ago and instead of Crede, we were asking for Josh Fields (a MIGHTY bounty). I also saw one person in early 2008 suggest that Bocock for Crede straight up would have been a fair deal. Sure, it was a joke, but… lol.

But I agree. I’m extremely glad that nothing like these trades ever happened. Crede makes me crINGE a little, even when he’s hitting well. Could we have signed an extension? How long will that back hold up? Back problems don’t just go away. I believe they run a pretty high risk of being chronic. How do we expect a guy with these question marks to be a good bet to be either with the team or effective in three years? Now, Josh Fields… Yum.

And Rios for Lincecum. Many laughed in the face of that at the time. Regardless of whether I was among that brood, I join you in laughing in the face of it now.

The Giants did make one lousy move this offseason, though. They signed a contract with NBC.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 3:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I’d strongly consider trading Lewis alone for Fields, and I love Fred Lewis.

by rotorueter on Jun 29, 2008 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t. Josh Fields is like Joe Crede with a bad glove.

by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jun 29, 2008 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Josh Fields

Josh Fields is an even worse prospect than I realized. Had Josh had a .300 BABIP over his minor league career, his batting average would have been .237.

Freddie Lewis strikes out way too much, but Josh is even worse.

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh crap, now I need to do some stupid research.

Well, I’ll be. He’s nowhere near the prospect I thought he was either. I don’t think poorly of him, necessarily (he’s having an uninspiring year right now, though, that’s for sure), and the power’s totally legit, but he’s not looking like a superstar at all, really.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 30, 2008 1:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I like Fred Lewis, but lets not get carried away. He could wind up hitting .260 with 10 HR’s, 80 runs scored and 20 stolen bases just as easily as he could wind up with the line adamcopes projected for him. He’s been a pleasant suprise but I wouldnt call him an elite leadoff hitter.

by sam23 on Jun 29, 2008 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

I don’t know what Adamcopes projected for Fast Freddie, but your projection looks reasonable to me. Doesn’t Adam get that Freddie is hitting as high as he is because he has been protected against many left-handed pitchers? Doesn’t he know that Freddie is hititng .281 only because his BABIP is an unsustainable .362? Doesn’t he know that Freddie struck out “only” once every 4.9 at bats with the Giants last season but has fanned once every 3.8 at bats this year as pitchers have found his weaknesses?

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hahaha. I enjoyed your comment howtheyscored. I invite you keep reading my articles. I think your right in that there was never any real offer of Lewis and Sanchez for Crede. However, many fans felt that if the Giants were going to acquire someone (like a Crede) they would be the one’s to go. Thanks for the post

by adamcopes on Jun 29, 2008 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think your right …

...to party is something you’ve got fight for.

2008 Giants: Scrappy! Scrappy! Joy! Joy!

by Goofus on Jun 30, 2008 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Supposing Lincecum got traded for Rios and Sanchez/Lewis was traded for Crede, let’s see what the team looks like:

LF – Winn
2B – Durham
RF – Rios
C – Molina
CF – Rowand
3B – Crede
1B – Aurilia
SS – Vizquel/Burris

Rotation:
Cain
Zito
Correia
Misch
Someone…

While the lineup sort of looks semi-okay, with legitimate hitter types in the middle, that rotation makes me feel ill.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jun 29, 2008 7:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Someone? Hey, I’m someone! That coulda been me! Why didn’t we do this?!

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe if they had drafted you...

Only 891 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jun 29, 2008 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, I really enjoy that Molina is still batting cleanup.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly!

I have a hard time imagining them NOT batting Molina in the cleanup spot. I think the lineup above would have given them better flexibility to decide who to bat where, but my guess is… Molina bats fourth.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jun 30, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey!

No need to trade for Crede, we can sign him for $18M/year after the season.
I think people were willing to trade Sanchez for a solid hitting prospect… but people were more than a little queasy about it.

Lincecum for Rios would have probably been the worst second-worst trade of all time.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN

by zenbitz on Jun 29, 2008 9:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I assume the first worst would have been Nathan, Bonser, and Liriano for Pierzynski?

by adamcopes on Jun 29, 2008 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

slight chance youre banned after saying that…....

proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..

by Azmanz on Jun 29, 2008 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jonathan Sanchez has come along much faster than anyone could have anticipated. There was a lot of hype around him last season but no one could seem to understand why. All that was ever said about was that he “has a live arm, and a lot of potential.” After finishing 2007 with a record of 1-5 and an ERA close to 6.00. It’s a wonder no one wanted him. However, he has quickly become the Giants best pitcher next to Lincecum. .

There are a few of us here who have always believed in Jonathan Sanchez. We believed he was a special talent. The concern was that we saw him as a starting pitcher and thought the SF Giants needed to stop jerking the kid around. FINALLY the Giants are reaping the rewards of Jonathan Sanchez – the starting pitcher.

by wilriv21 on Jun 29, 2008 10:36 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. He’s found his niche. J-Sanch for Prez!

by adamcopes on Jun 29, 2008 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's wait until he's 35. But I'll make you a deal.

In the meantime, I will vote for a youngish guy with an ethnic name and with skin darker than my own.

DFA all Giants over 34 years old.

by Mayor of 311 on Jun 29, 2008 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i didnt think sanchez could pitch more than 5 innings. he always seemed to get lit up if bochy ever sent him out for more than 1 last year.. i love being wrong

proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..

by Azmanz on Jun 29, 2008 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lincecum for rios

I still doubt Sabean even considered this deal. I remember him saying that they had to listen to offers for he and Cain but I also distinctly remember it being discussed here and many coming to the conclusion, perhaps rightfully so, that the Giants never intended to include Lincecum in that deal but because Sabean said Cain and Lincecum were “almost untouchable” teams went there immediately while someone like Rios really would have only commanded a Sanchez and change in Sabean’s eyes. I tend to believe this to be true and therefore do not wake up in the morning thanking my lucky stars that a deal which I believe never had a chance of getting done didnt happen. Say what you want about Sabean but there is no way that deal was happening.

Someone get Damon Minor's agent on the phone stat!

by fanofvanlandingham on Jun 29, 2008 10:43 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t put it past Sabean to pull out another questionable trade. i.e. Nathan, Liriano, Bonser for Pierzynski. Accardo for Hillenbrand and Chulk. Aardsma and Williams for Latroy Hawkins…need I contiunue?

by adamcopes on Jun 29, 2008 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure you can continue to cherry pick

feel free.

Someone get Damon Minor's agent on the phone stat!

by fanofvanlandingham on Jun 29, 2008 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sabean has yet to trade a starting pitcher of any consequence.

by StickRat on Jun 29, 2008 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ortiz and Hernandez both went to All Star games after Sabean traded them. That’s gotta be considered some consequence don’t it? I guess it’s worth noting that Keith Foulke was being used as a starter for us at the time of his trade, as well.

My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.

by Roger on Jun 29, 2008 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hernandez left the Giants to pitch for non-competitive teams, which was largely the reason for his success. Ortiz had one very good year, and then disintigrated. Yet, each of their salaries spiked after leaving SF. So, in my opinion, not much of a consequence … other than Sabean got low-cost returns on both pitchers just before inflation kicked in, while their respective talents declined.

Add Foulke to the laundry list of top-notch relievers the G’s have traded, but that’s another story.

by StickRat on Jun 29, 2008 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do you know?

How do you know that pitching for non-competitive teams (which the Expos/Nationals, his team for three or four years certainly was) was largely the reason for his success? The answer is that you don’t.

Had you said that an Expos/Nationals coach helped Livan make a change in his delivery and that the change might well not have happened with the Giants, I would agree with you.

But I can’t agree with you on speculation that is likely wrong.

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Furthermore, though, playing for a non-competetive team doesn’t even intuitively suggest having inflated performances, since as a pitcher your results come LARGELY via your competition and only minimally via your own team.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 30, 2008 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Non-competitive teams tend to face less competitive versions of competitive teams. It’s a fairly common practice for contenders to approach non-competitive teams differently, resting key players, utilizing their lesser pitchers, etc.

by StickRat on Jun 30, 2008 2:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In baseball?

I’ve seen this kind of thing happen in football, MAYBE, and certainly when games are less consequential, but I’ve never heard of it as “common practice” in baseball, where playing bad teams lightly means you’re probably playing about half your 162 game schedule like you don’t care.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 30, 2008 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It isn’t that teams don’t care. It’s just a matter of pacing … good teams tend not to hit bad teams with both barrels. Hence, decent pitchers win more games on bad teams than they would on good teams.

Plus, a marginal veteran simply gets more opportunities to win on a bad team. Hernandez had a great career with the Expos/Nats. He won 50 games in 3+ seasons with them. But, would he have been effective if teams weren’t content with taking 2-of-3 games from them? Probably not. Five of Hernandez’s 15 wins in 2003 were in games where the Expos lost a series 2-of-3. Take those decisions and put them into a competitive situation, Hernandez ends up with a sub-.500 record.

It’s simply easier for a crafty veteran pitcher to excel on a bad team.

by StickRat on Jun 30, 2008 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really

I haven’t noticed this being the case this year against our Giants. Maybe you could back this up with some sort of evidence?

Only 891 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jun 30, 2008 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Evidence ...

Game 7 of the ‘02 World Series. Or, his sub-.500 record that season. Or the sub-.500 record he posted in his career with the D-Backs.

And, he will probably finish around the .500 mark again this year after a 6-1 start. Hernandez just isn’t a pitcher of consequence. He is an innings eater that has bartered for a winning career record by playing for a crappy team.

by StickRat on Jun 30, 2008 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now I know you're making stuff up.

They award the Giants a World Series title in 02 right after the NLDS cause they couldn’t have two wild card teams in the WS.

Everybody Loves Durham
comics | cartoons | Nattowear

by Natto on Jun 30, 2008 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't remember that?

We celebrated at McCovey Chronicles for a month! Which is a little weird, because McCovey Chronicles wouldn’t be founded for another couple years. But I guess that’s the power of McC to bring people together.

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jun 30, 2008 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was asking for evidence that good teams play their bad players against bad teams, not of Hernandez not being good.

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jun 30, 2008 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah I was going to mention that

But then I decided the argument wasn’t worth pursuing.

Only 891 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jun 30, 2008 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cubs pull into town tonight … Aramis Ramirez isn’t in the lineup.

by StickRat on Jun 30, 2008 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His son is being born. Guys get games off for that.

And, by the way, he asked for all four days off and the Cubs only gave him three. Why? Because maybe they want to play their good players, even against the Giants.

Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com and on it I make jokes about things.

by groug on Jun 30, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fortunate she didn’t go into labor this coming weekend, or he probably wouldn’t have gotten any time off. C’mon guys, this is commonplace. It’s no coincidence Carlos Zamrano comes off the DL this weekend to face St. Louis.

by StickRat on Jun 30, 2008 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I beg to differ, Pedro Liriano and Boof Bonser. How many times do we have to go through this?

by adamcopes on Jun 29, 2008 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s true, too, though the Liriano point would have more impact if you could actually remember his first name accurately.

My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.

by Roger on Jun 29, 2008 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lucky?

NL West TempestTeapot - An ENTIRE DIVISION under .500!

by victor frankenstein on Jun 29, 2008 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude was just a big Pedro Liriano fan.

Everybody Loves Durham
comics | cartoons | Nattowear

by Natto on Jun 29, 2008 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thirteen career wins in three years is not much of a consequence, even if Liriano did earn 12 of them in one season. Bonser would be a down grade as a fifth starter for the Giants. So, to answer your question, we’re going to keep going through this until you get it right.

by StickRat on Jun 29, 2008 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

pedro?

proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..

by Azmanz on Jun 29, 2008 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We did have a Pedro Liriano, but he’s probably referring to the other guy.

Everybody Loves Durham
comics | cartoons | Nattowear

by Natto on Jun 29, 2008 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fight fire with fire

If you don’t like his list of recent debacle trades, cherry pick some recent steals.

well?

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Jun 29, 2008 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not my point

sabean’s trade history as a whole certainly is not consistent with those two deals and nowhere in my response did I say his recent track record was good. The Giants have been pretty adept at trading highly touted pitching prospects who turn out to be sub-par. The Matt Morris trade was a recent deal and while we didnt keep Rajai Davis around, we did unload a terrible contract connected to a guy who is out of baseball. We turned a useless michael tucker into a useful prospect. If we end up turning Randy Winn into anything useful you could we would have came out on top of two deals involving him. There’s my attempt at cherry picking.

Someone get Damon Minor's agent on the phone stat!

by fanofvanlandingham on Jun 29, 2008 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Randy Winn is worth more of a return than “anything useful”.

by StickRat on Jun 29, 2008 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree

and I hope you are right. I just did not want to speculate as to what we may get for him.

Someone get Damon Minor's agent on the phone stat!

by fanofvanlandingham on Jun 29, 2008 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sabean spoke

Sabean spoke as if he were seriously considering the deal. I know I was making preparations to root for the Blue Jays as my second team.

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Players for whom I would have traded Jonathan Sanchez this offseason:

Lastings Milledge
Edwin Encarnacion
Asdrubal Cabrera
Steven Pearce

Piece of evidence #2432 that I should never be allowed near the front office of a baseball team. I’d hang up on a GM who tried to offer me those players now. Maybe not Cabrera. He’ll still be a stud.

by Grant on Jun 29, 2008 11:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hindsight is always 20/20

Sanchez could have sucked or suffered incurable chick cancer

by Giant Voodoo on Jun 29, 2008 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The sexiest of all the cancers. Way sexier than the second sexiest of the cancers: colon.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Colon

I always knew he had a weight problem but I have never heard that he was a cancer. And especially not a sexy cancer at that.

Only 891 games until the end of Zito's contract

by thehavenot on Jun 29, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for linking to that. It gave me one of those moments you get where you read something you wrote months ago and think “Hey, I said something, and it was actually pretty funny.”

That comment I made about the fingertip in my cha-cha bowl amuses me.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Jun 29, 2008 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Glad I could assist

My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.

by Roger on Jun 29, 2008 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How was it hard?

How was it hard to imagine a 2008 Giants’ lineup without Barry Bonds when the Giants had already announced that he wouldn’t be back?

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Anyone

Anyone who was intrigued by the thought of trading Tim Lincecum for Alex Rios likely isn’t a good talent evaluator. Personally I about DIED when the Giants were considering the trade.

First of all, they were looking at trading the wrong pitcher. If they were going to trade either of the two “aces,” it should have been Cain, not Lincecum—especially if all they were going to get was Rios.

Secondly, the Giants should have been talking Rios and the prospect Snider, not just Rios.

by sharksrog on Jun 30, 2008 12:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Small
Could the Giants get any Compensation Picks?
Shadow_grad_small
We're interested in Uggla...
Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!
Panda_bubble_small
First Baseman of the future
Timmy_avatar_small
Downloadable Game Broadcasts?
29x2_small
All-time favorite SF Giants: closer
Small
Would you trade Jeremy Affeldt?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S