McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Lack of execution

As a Giants fan, I rarely watch any A's baseball or American League baseball for that matter, the only time I watch American League baseball is on FOX during the postseason, if I am intrigued enough by the Sunday Night Baseball matchup on ESPN, or when the A's play the Giants at the Oakland Collesium.  That being said, I don't know much about the strategy that is played in the American League in terms of sacrifice bunting, hitting and running, and stealing, that whole moving the runners type of deal. I've absolutely seen "small ball" played by numerous American League teams, most especially by the Angels with Mike Scocia at the managing helm, and more recently at AT&T Park this season when the Giants were swept by the Chicago White Sox in mid May.  However, tonight's ballgame was a distinct example of the lack of execution in the American League due to Oakland's Bobby Crosby's inability to lay down a sacrifice bunt with Kurt Suzuki at second base and nobody out. The following hitter, Carlos Gomez drove a deep flyball that landed in the mitt of right fielder Randy Winn, which would have scored Suzuki, if Crosby had executed the bunt. The point I'm getting at is that how many hitters in the American League are asked to lay down a sacrifice bunt? I know they are major league hitters and bunting should be apart of their repitoire, but Bobby Crosby looked terrible attempting to sacrifice Suzuki to third base. I guess I just prefer the low scoring, scratch out one run, 1-0, 2-1 types of games. Go Giants! Go Sanchez.

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs  |  Comment 9 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Lack of execution?

Hit balls hard and on a line and you’ll start scoring more runs.

You score more with a runner on 2nd and no outs than a runner on third with one out.

The Aim of the Game is: DON’T MAKE OUTS.

regardless, i’m against capital punishment.

Also, Boston Redsox: 38 Sacrifice Hits last year. LAA: 30; CHIWS: 31.
weiiiiiird.

BROCK BOND LIKES HIS MARTINIS PUNCHED IN THE FACE, NOT STIRRED.

by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Jun 29, 2008 1:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Fail

The aim of the game is trade outs for runs intelligently within the context of the game state.

With two baserunners as slow as Suzuki and Cust you may not get any runs at all if you leave them where they were on second and first.

Fred Lewis can stand under my umbrella.

by S.F. Giangst on Jun 29, 2008 6:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

It doesn’t matter if you have Suzuki, Cust, Molina, or JT Snow with a backpack full of bricks. HRs will score them. Doubles will score them. And yes, sometimes, singles will score them from second base.

There are times where you play for one run because that’s what you need, but at that point, Dave Roberts or Rajai Davis would pinch run anyway.

by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Jun 29, 2008 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

But the best (“most intelligent”) ratio is X runs / 0 outs. i.e, don’t make outs.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN

by zenbitz on Jun 29, 2008 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SUPERFAIL

the only time when you “intelligently”[sic] trade outs for runs is when the batter is a proven poor hitter, as in a pitcher who bats under like .177.

taking away outs is just giving .300 batters less chances to move them over.

3 chances at 30% success > 2 chances at 35% (taking into account sac flies)

BROCK BOND LIKES HIS MARTINIS PUNCHED IN THE FACE, NOT STIRRED.

by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Jun 29, 2008 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

early in the game i agree. late in the a 1 run game, you want to score at the highest probability. yes you will score more runs in the long if you dont sacrafice (i.e. better shot at a 3-4 run inning), but you will score less often if you dont. thats why its called situational hitting

proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..

by Azmanz on Jun 29, 2008 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's okay

Some people don’t understand the difference between in general and specifically.

In general, you will score more runs w/ a runner on 2nd and no outs than with a runner on 3rd with 1 out.

Specifically, you have to realize the game state – something the statisticians can’t quite figure out.

However, I kinda think Crosby bunting there was retarded.

Eugeniooooooo!!!!

by FairweatherFan on Jun 29, 2008 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Besides

That botched bunt was just the baseball gods making up for Cust’s bullshit hit.

Eugeniooooooo!!!!

by FairweatherFan on Jun 29, 2008 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

Statisticians are excellent at figuring out game state, creating complex tables of specific inning/out/score/baserunner situations is a perfect example of applied baseball statistics. It’s just that the overwhelming majority of us aren’t statisticians.

VAE PVTO DEVS FIO

by Bhaakon on Jun 30, 2008 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Small
Could the Giants get any Compensation Picks?
Shadow_grad_small
We're interested in Uggla...
Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!
Panda_bubble_small
First Baseman of the future
Timmy_avatar_small
Downloadable Game Broadcasts?
29x2_small
All-time favorite SF Giants: closer
Small
Would you trade Jeremy Affeldt?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S