Sabean is dumb, but not that dumb Mr. Williams
Found this blurb funny ion SFGATE.COM:
Crede talk: With the White Sox due in this weekend, it is fair to ask why the Giants did not pull the trigger in spring training and trade for Chicago third baseman Joe Crede, who had seven homers and 25 RBIs through Monday.
According to a source, the White Sox first asked the Giants for Jonathan Sanchez, then upped their demand to Sanchez plus either pitchers Madison Bumgarner or Tim Alderson, the team's top two draft picks in 2007, or 17-year-old first-base prospect Angel Villalona. The source said the Giants did not want to give away that much for a player set to become a free agent after the 2008 season.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/13/SPQR10LIBC.DTL
Who the hell would give up any of those guys for Crede? Is this source just a crackhead from the southside? Could the Giants have even traded Bumgarner this summer? Sanchez alone to me would have been an overpayment.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
The source..
White Sox SB Nation fanpost.
by mxmob33 on May 13, 2008 11:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I remember that fanpost
It was called a Diary at the time.
I’m pretty sure the writer thought the Sox should be getting Sanchez, Bumgarner, Alderson, and Villalona for Crede, though, not just two of the five.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on May 14, 2008 3:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i doubt sabean would have traded sanchez for crede straight up.. i wouldnt at least
by Azmanz on May 13, 2008 11:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i think a fair # on here
would have done that deal before the season started
by slojoe on May 13, 2008 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least one
I can tell you at least one who WOULDN’T have done the Sanchez/Crede deal before the season began. You don’t successfully rebuild by making expediency sacrifices like that one.
by sharksrog on May 14, 2008 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hell, i didnt even want to trade Lowry
by slojoe on May 14, 2008 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
offereing for Lowry..
And the deal was done in my mind. Once he went down in ST with an injury I thought he’d never pitch in baseballa gain.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on May 14, 2008 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hell no. Just the opposite, everyone here was afraid that we’d make a deal like that for Crede. Speaking for myself, Sanchez is up there with Cain and Lincecum in my lack of desire to trade him. Kid’s gonna be something.
No, really, I have updated my blog this year: http://skaldheim.livejournal.com/tag/baseball
by Skaldheim on May 14, 2008 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont recall that...
maybe most didnt want Crede…
there was thread after thread dealing with which pitchers the giants should deal- most said
Lowry, but some were also ready to deal Sancheeze
by slojoe on May 14, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crede was perceived as damaged goods entering a contract year
Sabean wisely offered slop for him.
I can hardly believe he didn’t cave.
by Moggeee on May 13, 2008 11:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
link doesnt work
what exactly did sabean offer?
by slojoe on May 13, 2008 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently, less than Sanchez
who at the time was not even projected as a starter
by Moggeee on May 13, 2008 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait until the trade deadline has passed.
Then we can really say that Sabean isn’t that dumb.
Until then, anything can happen.
Proud adoptive parent of Tim Alderson.
by Anticon23 on May 13, 2008 11:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If that is true...
Then wow, Williams is a fool to think Sabean would fall for that.
Or am I the fool for thinking Sabean wouldn’t fall for that?
by withclubsauce on May 13, 2008 11:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow that’s just… delusional on a whole special level right there. For JOE CREDE???
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
by jponry on May 14, 2008 4:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It hurts my brain to know there are people out there this stupid, honestly.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 14, 2008 7:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
One problem with this story
Baseball rules would have prohibited trading either Bumgarner or Alderson this spring. In fact, I believe they even prohibit trying to circumvent the rule with a handshake deal on a PTBNL. When a major detail of a story is actually impossible, it tends to make me doubt the story as a whole.
My boy ain't fat, he's just big boned. Big bat, too.
by Roger on May 14, 2008 9:21 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I like how it says Williams asked for Sanchez originally and then also asked for additional and more valuable prospects. That’s negotiating in the wrong direction.
How bout Crede for Sanchez straight up? No? Ok then, toss in Bumgarner or Alderson and its a deal. No again huh? Alright alright, you’re busting my balls here, but I’ll do it. You give me Sanchez, Alderson, and Villalona, and Joe Crede is your starting 3B in 2008.
by hammystyle on May 14, 2008 9:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
When you sy it like that I wonder if Williams is the new Littlefield?
" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.
by daveinexile on May 14, 2008 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















