White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Apparently what Brian's pushing ain't enough for Crede. From SI's John Heyman:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/jon_heyman/03/05/bc.heyman.wed.scoop/1.html
"The White Sox apparently haven't been enamored by what the Giants have to offer for third baseman Joe Crede. A Giants person conceded, "We badly need bats,'' but they aren't to the point where they'll give up any of their better pitchers to get them. One possibility could be hard-throwing reliever Jonathan Sanchez, though it appears now that Crede may not be traded until closer to this summer's deadline."
Crisis averted?
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
84 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
guess that is a good thing
getting crede doesnt mean anything unless he can be signed long term anyway
Brilliant
(And what the heck are you and bacci doing awake at that hour?)
by Giant Fan in Singapore on Mar 6, 2008 1:37 AM PST up reply actions
By my count it'd only be 11:30 west coast time.
Re: By my count...
Re: By my count...
by howtheyscored on Mar 6, 2008 1:13 PM PST up reply actions
Re: Brilliant
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Natto's comic strip
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Mar 6, 2008 11:06 AM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
by E Ticket on Mar 7, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
The guy is a surgery waiting to happen.
by howtheyscored on Mar 6, 2008 11:13 AM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
As a starter, he's 1-4 with a 7.27 ERA. As a reliever, he's 3-2 with a 4.40 ERA. His strike out totals(95 in 92 innings) are nice and shiny, but the rest of his line ain't nearly that nice:
Hitters have this lovely line off of him: .269/.371/.409.
By comparison, here's the Giants collective line last season:
.254/.322/.387.
I'm not saying give up Sanchez, I'm just saying his time for excuses has come and gone. He needs to start putting up and thusfar in ST, he simply has not.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Saying that he has an ERA over 7 in just 30-some innings isn't going to convince me that he can't succeed in that role.
Fact - The Giants have bounced him -- and might I add, I think rather foolishly -- between roles more than any other prospect that I can recall in recent memory.
Fact - Sanchez has way more upside than any other current could-maybe-be rotation candidate. He's got tons more upside than either Correia or Misch.
Why has his time for excuses come and gone? The truth is that the Giants have done a horrible job in handling his role development. Is he a reliver? Is he a starter? OK, lets let him relieve again. Crap, let's make him start again. Hmm, let's send him to AAA and let him start. Wait, we need relievers on the big club! Quick, call him up and make him relieve!
The back-and-forth is nauseating. I'm a big Sanchez supporter but I think the Giants have hindered his development.
For a team that supposedly prides itself on pitcher development, they've dropped the ball on this one. The Lowry injury could be good for Sanchez, depending on the extent of Lowry's injury, Sanchez could get some time to start this year. He's way more qualified than Correia to start and I just wish the Giants would also realize that.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
I'm not arguing with you, I'm just wondering what makes you think Sanchez is more qualified?
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
He has more potential, but Kevin is WAY ahead as far as where he is right now.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
It's somewhat analogous to the way Frandsen started, like, four or five different positions last season during those rare times when he got to play. It's only when he got a long, sustained look at second base that he started to (relatively) blossom. Not saying Frandsen has this huge potential, but it certainly wasn't being realized the way Bochy threw him around the field.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Unless Sanchez has some sort of mental flaw that prohibits him from being able to concentrate on pitching well unless given a specific task over a long period of time -- and I don't think any of us are qualified to assume that -- it's not good enough to say that he's been moved too much and that's why he can't throw strikes and maintain a consistent delivery.
I like Sanchez and would really enjoy seeing him with the opportunity to prove himself as a starter. He's an exciting pitcher to watch but I don't really think he's ready and its not because he doesn't have a defined role. It's because he has more to learn.
Also, why does Sanchez get a pass for being moved around the staff but not Correia? Correia has been bounced around just as much but when he got a string of starts last year, he did well.
As far as Frandsen, I think the same rule applies. To me, it has more to do with the player's talent than with their role on a team. To say that his success last year was due to his continual role as a second-baseman, I feel ignores the fact that he was getting more plate appearances at that time. It probably had little to do with the fact that he had the same defensive position every day and more to do with timing from repetition in the batter's box.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
When you have to learn a new position, it can take away a lot of your mental focus. And when you're failing at the new position, it can make you press to make up for it on the other side.
Knowing that you're capable and able in your position allows you to play calmer all around.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Correia: 288 ip
Hennessey: 320 ip
Sanchez: 92 ip
I don't necessarily think that putting a developing pitcher in the bullpen is a horrible thing. It's something that shouldn't be done if you can help it, though. And what has happened to Sanchez is just rediculous.
Bouncing
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Mar 6, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
Re: Bouncing
"Congrats son, you're our new 5th outfielder. Lucky you! And if you absolutely rake in the four at-bats you'll be receiving each week, we'll promote you to full-time starter in two short years."
Its rather sickening.
Re: Bouncing
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
- They both throw hard
- Correia has shown more consistent control
- Correia has more pitches
- Correia has demonstrated more success at the MLB level
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
I'd say for a righty Corriea has average velocity. Sanchez throws harder, and from the left side. Above average velocity from a lefty. Point Sanchez.
>> Correia has shown more consistent control
I can't find minor league PA numbers for Correia and Sanchez, so I can't calculate their BB% in the minors (which I prefer to BB/9) but I can do BB/9 for both of them, majors and minors.
Correia BB/9
Majors (287 IP) - 3.79
Minors (306 IP) - 3.26
Sanchez BB/9
Majors (92 IP) - 4.99
Minors (252.2 IP) - 3.50
I don't think Sanchez is a 5 BB per 9 inning guy in the majors. His control has never been superb, but it's not like Correia is Greg Maddux either. Sanchez offsets his sometimes-not-so-great control with a superior K-rate. Since we're talking about control, I'll give the point to Correia but it's not one he's supremely better at than Sanchez.
>> Correia has more pitches
None of which rate as plus pitches. Sanchez has two plus pitches, a fastball and a really good changeup.
Furthermore, how many pitches does Correia have? I've always thought he had three. A FB, change, and slider. PITCHf/x data on Correia has him only throwing those three pitches. Is he throwing a curve I don't know about?
PITCHf/x has Sanchez throwing three pitches last year. A FB, Change, and a incorrectly labeled curveball which is his slider. Point Sanchez. He's got two pitches that grade as plus and to my knowledge throws as many pitches as Correia. None of Correia's offerings grade out above average.
>> Correia has demonstrated more success at the MLB level
I disagree with this, but I'd agree with you if you said that "Correia has been given more chances at the MLB level". He's thrown almost 3x the amount of innings that Sanchez has. I can't hold that against Sanchez that the Giants haven't given him fair shakes.
Correia's a decent bullpen option, but pitching from the bullpen is easier than starting. His career ERA of 4.03 is lowered to an extent by his time in the bullpen and would most likely get pushed to the mid-4's if he was starting.
Sanchez throws harder and has better pitch quality on two of his pitches. His minor league track record is stronger than Correia's too, for whatever reason, he just hasn't had the same chance that Correia has had in the majors to prove himself.
At the end of the day, Sanchez could be a mid rotation starter, while the best that Correia can hope for is to work the back of the rotation. How can you not see that he has more upside?
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Math fun:
PA = IP + BB + H (ignoring HBP)
BB% = BB/PA
BB = (BB/9i) * IP/9
H = (H/9i) * IP/9
PA = 3*IP(outs) + (BB/9i)*IP/9 + (H/9i)*IP/9
IP = 9*IP/9
9PA = 27*IP + (BB/9i)*IP + (H/9i)*IP
BB% = BB/PA = 9BB/9PA
BB% = (BB/9i)*IP / (27*IP + (BB/9i)*IP + (H/9i)*IP)
BB% = (BB/9i)/(27 + BB/9i + H/9i)
So you can get BB% from BB/9 and H/9.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
by E Ticket on Mar 7, 2008 3:33 PM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
In 92 IP
And from that you conclude that "his time for excuses has come and gone."
That is the kind of roster building that leads to trading intriguing young players for washed up vets: for example Jeremy Accardo for Shea Hillenbrand.
How about giving him a defined role, say in AAA if you do not trust him in MLB, and giving him a chance to actually earn a shot?
phone transcription
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on Mar 6, 2008 11:15 AM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Give him a defined role and see how he does.
And it's far too early to be nitpicky about Spring Training statistics. If that was the case, Noah Lowry should be in rookie ball and Brian Bocock would be challenging for a batting title. Hitters are always more prepared than pitchers are at the beginning of the Spring.
Bah..
First third: Pitchers ahead since they arrived in camp earlier and started baseball activities earlier.
MIddle third: Batters ahead since pitchers are still stretching out and trying things.
Last third: Competition like the regular season.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
W-L/ERA are awful stats to use over sample sized doses. Neither one is ever useful when looking at relief stats, thuogh ERA for a reliever over the course of a career has a good shot at evening out to reflect talent. Year to year, though, not even a little. W-L is generally a bad stat to use, though it evens out a lot for starters when you get a lot of games behind it. ERA for starters gets better and better the more years you put behind it.
You have to look at way more than Sanchez's combined ML W-L/ERA to get anything resembling a good statistical scouting report on the guy. And especially so because less than 100IP is miserably small.
by howtheyscored on Mar 6, 2008 11:20 AM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
If consistency and a clearly defined role is what he needs to settle, he's probably out of luck because no one in this org seems willing to give him that...
That said, you're right about Lowry. If Noah's MRI results come back today and show him out for awhile, this will be Sanchez's time. If it is his time, he needs to step up and take it by the horns.
If he does that, I will very, very gladly say I was wrong about him, but for now, I admit to just not being impressed by unrealized potential.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Which is the worst part about the whole thing. When you're going to start Correia over Sanchez because of Correia's 40-some flukey innings of spot starts last year, I can't understand it.
At his best, Correia could be a nice 5th starter. But as Sanchez's best, he could potentially turn into a nice #3. He's got a better fastball -- and from the left side, too, a little more rare for lefties to have his velocity -- and better offspeed stuff. His change is a plus pitch for him and if he could learn to throw his slider a little more consistently -- it's tougher because of his low arm slot -- he could take off.
What would be better for the future of the Giants? Seeing if Sanchez can develop into a #3 or letting Correia be a #5? In this time of the Giants history, they've got the ability to find out what Sanchez has. It's just a shame that they don't seem to understand that.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
I don't dislike Correia, but I don't think he's anythng special. Servicable and useful, but little more than that. Sanchez's ceiling if he could harness and point it, is far greater.
But the question is - since the Giants seem utterly unwillng to allow him the chance to do such, will they give up on him much as I have...
See I've given up on him because in the shuttle role, he's pretty much useless and I don't see management letting him out of that.
If they've given up on him, it's because they have no imagination. Rags radio comments from a few days suggest as much.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
You're right, he'll be nothing better than a 5th starter
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
(I never said he didn't do well as a spot-starter, try reading sometime!)
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
If you think that his good ERA from 40 innings last year as a starter are predictive or help to define how good he'll be as a starter, then I can't help you.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
As I'm sure you're aware, professional baseball is filled with people who have tons of talent, but for whatever reason can't put it together at the next level (so is every professional sport, for that matter). I'm not saying that Sanchez will never put it together, but as of right now, he hasn't, and Correia has.
Correia is still young, he could be around when the Giants are competitive again. Chucking him from the rotation because there's a chance someone else might be better would be really really dumb, like even dumber than Sabean dumb. Following that reasoning, we might as well just start Noonan at 2b this year, because he has WAY more potential than Frandsen. (last sentence exaggerated for effect)
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
But, amazingly, Kevin pitched BETTER as a starter than out of the bullpen. Midway through the season it appeared that since Kevin was being hurt by ill-timed long balls, he might well benefit from becoming a starter, where one home run was less likely to ruin his outing.
I don't think anyone expected Kevin to pitch as well as a starter as he did, however. This will surprise you -- or at least it greatly surprised me -- but Kevin's line drive percentage last season was even lower than either Tim Lincecum's or Matt Cain's. I'm presuming Kevin's line drive percentage as a starter was even lower yet, although that is merely a supposition on my part.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
I'd wager that he got a little lucky with LD's last year and he's not seriously lopped 5% of his LD-rate.
I'm not denying he didn't pitch well as a spot-starter last year, but his upside just isn't as big as Sanchez's, and my point is that with the Giants being as lousy as they are this year, they can explore Sanchez's superior upside instead of going with the safe choice of Correia who's a known quantity.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
If I were going to predict his LD% for 2008, I would probably go with something like 18.8%.
That said, Kevin was OUTSTANDING as a starter last season, albeit in a small sample.
I'm not going to jump into the Correia vs Sanchez
Relieves perform better than starters across the board: ERA, K rate, BB rate.
Studies by BPro, THT, MGL Tango Dolphin, have shown this.
Re: #1 SANCHEZ FAN OMG
I think you're underestimating Correia, though. Last two years, he's pitched 170 innings with an FIP around 3.80. That will go up some as a full-time starter, but I think he's a solid #4 right now.
Re: #1 SANCHEZ FAN OMG
I think Jonathan might be best served by beginning the season in Fresno's starting rotation, developing and waiting for an opening in the rotation in San Francisco.
That said, I also have a suspicion that the best way to use him would be to pitch him every other day in relief. I do have fears about the health of his arm, so I would baby it.
It doesn't have to be
Sanchez hasn't exactly beaten AAA hitters into submission yet.
A half season or even one full season as a starter in AAA is not going to permanently stunt his developement. If he pitches well at AAA, with Lowry struggling, Correia no sure thing, there is likely to be a spot for him.
Re: It doesn't have to be
Re: #1 SANCHEZ FAN OMG
my feelings on Sanchez
Re: my feelings on Sanchez
Re: my feelings on Sanchez
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Good Sabean. Have a Scooby snack.
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Mar 6, 2008 10:31 AM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
The White Sox likely WOULD be well-served to try to get Joe some at bats to demonstrate that he is healthy again. Closer to the trade deadline they might actually be able to get something for him.
On the other hand, if the White Sox are somewhat hamstrung by salaries and need to get rid of Crede early in the season, the Giants might be able to pick up a low-risk opportunity.
I have to agree with both you on your points.
Yes
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Mar 6, 2008 1:04 PM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
by E Ticket on Mar 7, 2008 3:41 PM PST up reply actions
Frandsen has less down side
However an veteran over 30 damn near has to have a Dravecky like event to ride the pine even if he is turning in E.P.A. Super Fund performances. Plus who is likely to force the issue in the next 2 years at third? Leone? Denker?
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
+1
by BruteSentiment on Mar 6, 2008 12:31 PM PST up reply actions
Re: White Sox Don't Like What Sabean Is Offering
sanchez?
http://baseball.bornbybits.com/php/combined_tool.php?pit=456043&bat=0&type=-1&result=-1& amp;count=-1&r_spd=1&spd=-1&r_brx=1&brx=-100&r_brz=1&brz=-100&l_b=0
Correia throws 91mph from the right:
http://baseball.bornbybits.com/php/combined_tool.php?pit=429781&bat=0&type=-1&result=-1& amp;count=-1&r_spd=1&spd=-1&r_brx=1&brx=-100&r_brz=1&brz=-100&l_b=0
Sure, velocity isn't everything, but with the K% Sanchez features, you don't give him up for a poor man's, whiter Pedro Feliz (Crede: decent defense, weak bat).
Re: sanchez?
Re: sanchez?
by E Ticket on Mar 7, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions

by 



















