Sub-title: Gets mocked by any being with an IQ above 50.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AqVulMVBKLnVGibPjFrQ6xA5nYcB?slug=anonbettingmansworldseri& ;prov=tsn&type=lgns

Anyways, I understand that he's picking them as the sleeper bet with longshot odds, but I don't really care.  There is no chance for the Giants this year, and based on those odds there are better teams that have longer odds.  Personally, if I were betting with the listed odds, these are the teams I would take (in order):

Tampa: 150 to 1.  They've got a young team that could take a huge step forward, their defense should be much better this year, and PECOTA projected them for like 89 wins.  It would seem they are close.  The Giants odds were 100 to 1, and Tampa so obviously has a better shot than us.

Nationals: 200 to 1.  They have a lot of interesting options for offense, especially in the outfield.  Their pitching staff is questionable, but at 200 to 1, this seems like a decent enough bet.

Arizona: 22 to 1.  I'm agreeing with the guy I called a moron, I know.  Anyways, this seems fairly straightforward.  What they will surely lose in the bullpen from last year, they should gain back from the development of their hitters and the acquisition of Haren.  A healthy Randy would make this even more interesting.

Anyone have any bets they would take, based on the odds listed in the article?  I was interested in Cincy at 50 to 1, but I just can't trust Dusty to dole out playing time correctly.