Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7841636?MSNHPHMA

so bonds has every right to play, and everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and bonds wasnt the only one doing it....but hes a cancer??? hes the only cancer??

what about all the unamed users?

what about the owners, managers and coaches who either stayed silent or encouraged the use of ped's?

what about the media who chose not to do any serious investigation?

what about you ken?? as i recall, you were one of the head cheerleaders during the sosa/big mac hr chase. maybe its you show stay the fuck away from the baseball diamond during the 08 season.

And im so sick of everyone buying into the petit bs apology. the guy doesnt get caught, he never apologizes. and his story about why and the duration of his use still doesnt hold water. but hes no cancer.

no....just bonds

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a dickless motherfucker
The signing of Bonds would put the sport's problem with PEDs back in the headlines at a time when the fallout from the Mitchell report is fading, a time when Roger Clemens is more of a question for the government than a question for baseball.

If anything, this is an argument for Bonds to play in 2008.  He would represent a very bold and symbolic UP-YOURS to Mitchell and Selig.  Bonds isn't putting PEDs in the headlines...these A-holes and the reporters who get paid to write unreadable trash about their sport do.

Giants = Jack Crap.

by Woody Wins on Feb 26, 2008 6:47 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a dickless motherfucker
that article gave me the feeling that if i ever saw ken in person i would spit in his face. i am so tired of the way BB is vilified, yet everyone else seems to get what is close to a free pass. the only reason most fans despise PED users in the first place is because of the jaded way the media NOW wants to portray them.

why cant people accept the fact that the main reason the game has changed is due to the progression of time. athletes have year round training programs, nutritionists, and an infinite amount of other things available to them that was not there, nor thought of, in the supposed golden era of the game.

we can sit there and praise players of yesteryear for trying to gain advantages, ala scuffed balls, flattened bats, and numerous other means, yet BB gets thrown under the bus for supposedly taking advantage of things that were readily available to him and others.

the other thing i want to know is, what makes what BB supposedly did that much different than any player taking every supplement under the sun to gain an advantage? is it just the legality of said substances?

by m3lkor on Feb 26, 2008 7:10 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a dickless motherfucker
not to mention what some think is the single biggest factor - changes to the composition of the actual baseball, which MLB continues to deny.
2002? I'm over it. But I'll never be over Rich Aurilia.

by wjackalope on Feb 26, 2008 9:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
A dickless motherfucker? How can he do that if he doesn't have a...You know what I don't want to know.
You deserve to be struck out, when your first name's a verb.

by Cookyman on Feb 26, 2008 7:40 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
Because a dickless man is the kind of man only a mother could love.
Another dream come true for the Patrick make-a-Misch foundation

by Dolorous Edd on Feb 26, 2008 9:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
I SAID I DONT WANNA KNOW!!
You deserve to be struck out, when your first name's a verb.

by Cookyman on Feb 26, 2008 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
Well Ken's certainly a gaping a-hole.
Democracy is lovely but baseball is more mature. BVCE supports Manny Burriss and SF Dugout.

by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Feb 26, 2008 9:22 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a toolbag
Hey dickless, what about writing some shit about Roger Clemens being bad for baseball?
Idolizing the Nuschler Face since April 8, 1986 / GIANTSPACE returns!

by SoFa King Mike on Feb 26, 2008 9:34 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a toolbag
well apparently good ol texas boys get a free pass. they actually get some sort of semblance of innocent until proven guilty, unlike a certain someone.

by m3lkor on Feb 26, 2008 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a toolbag
Can't this country, instead of the "innocent until proven guilty" thingy, have like an "innocent until embarassing yourself in front of the whole country by mumble-fumbling your words and looking like a complete idgit while pretending not to know your wife was using HGH and saying you weren't at a party when there are pictures of you there and trying to influence a witness while your good pal corraborates a story where you admit to being guilty."?  

I mean, that seems like a pretty good judicial system to me.

Giants = Jack Crap.

by Woody Wins on Feb 26, 2008 10:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is a toolbag
i like that.

right up there with innocent until you say you arent there to talk about the past

by m3lkor on Feb 26, 2008 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
"Is this true?"

"Yes sir, this man has no dick."
-
That's really the only quote I ever need.

He is Vengeance. He is the Knight. He is Dave Righetti. PRAY TO HIM!

by howtheyscored on Feb 26, 2008 9:57 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
lol

i wish to apologize for the title that had to be edited, but i read this article late at nite, and just got so pissed

by bacci40 on Feb 26, 2008 11:44 AM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
#!#^!#%^!%^#$%##^(#&)@#&(%@)#^@#^)%#+@#%^@%#^% ^%!^#%%#)@%)#%^)@%#^)%#^%@%#^@%)#%@%#^@%^. Until you die....And that pretty much sums up my feelings on Ken the dick less wonder.
"Have you come to stick a knife in my corpse?".

by Ghost11 on Feb 26, 2008 5:02 PM PST reply actions  

Re: Ken Rosenthal is not a nice man
Rosenthal just adds his name to the long list of sports media who are making idiots of themselves on a daily basis with nonsense like this.

Rosenthal is basically saying here that the owners should all agree to not sign Bonds--collusion, in other words. Collusion was wrong when the owners were trying to keep payrolls down. But this is different, right Ken?

Look, we have a set of rules meant to govern and protect the game. They now include testing for steroids and other PEDs, and they include penalties for testing positive for their use.

Rosenthal, and the sports media in general, keep trying to set themselves up as the arbiters of who is clean and who isn't. I can think of a few problems with this approach:

  • The media's subjectivity and bias are astonishingly blatant.
  • The media doesn't have access to complete information on every major league player. They certainly are able to dig up their own dirt, but when the media digs up dirt on a player, it calls into question why that player was singled out, who else has been ignored, and what was the determining factor either way. Today, we all "know" that Barry Bonds used PEDs, but we have no idea how many others have used as well.
  • It's not the media's job. Ken Rosenthal has no authority, moral or otherwise, to tell any baseball owner who to sign or not to sign. It's MLB's job. Have they been doing that job? No, and that's certainly a big part of the problem. But the fact that Bud Selig is a buffoon and Gene Orza a sleazebag still doesn't mean that we need the game to be policed by the likes of Ken Rosenthal, Jim Rome and Rick Reilly.
Here's the only important point that needs to be made regarding whether or not Bonds should be allowed to Major League Baseball: Barry Bonds has not failed a test under the drug-testing rules adopted by the most recent collective bargaining agreement, nor has he done anything to warrant a suspension or removal from the game. If Bud Selig and MLB think that he has, then by all means, they should suspend Bonds. Or try to. Otherwise, Rosenthal and everyone like him should all pour themselves a nice, tall glass of shut the heck up.
That's all I can stands, I can't stands no more!

by tobias on Feb 27, 2008 2:51 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sp-giants21_ph_t_0501991449_part6_small
The McCovey Chronicles Fantasy League, For Money.
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
2012 Adoption Draft: Who's In?
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
2012 Adoption Draft: Rules Discussion
Honus_wagner4_small
Hector & Gregor's Excellent Adventure (In the VWL)
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List: The Results

Recent FanPosts

T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – College Left Handed Pitchers
Img_0100_small
Cormac McCarthy novel The Road
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – HS Left handed pitchers
Small
Angel Villalona reported to have a work visa
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot – The Catchers
Hidey-fern_small
Hiking on the 18th?
T_36396_small
2012 MLB Draft Snapshot - The Shortstops

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant Brisbee

Moderators

Minime_small Natto

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Goofus_small Goofus

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Det_7193_small jponry

Authors

09_small JT Jordan

Small steve S