The first paragraph is a bit misleading, as it incorrectly claims his tRA to have been 4.53, when it was actually his tRA* which is a regressed version of tRA. Personally i’m not a fan of tRA* but that’s a different discussion.

The article pretty much sums up the situation with Sanchez, in that he’s good underlying peripherals, but was inconsistant & that he’s likely a high risk -high reward pitcher going forward.