Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Breaking the Site's Deafening Silence on the Subject of Edgar Renteria

A funny thing happened between this post decrying the possibility of an Renteria-indebted Giants team, and the false-positive news that Renteria signed for two years. Surprise of surprises, I kind of liked the idea. Oh, sure, by most accounts, Renteria's fielding has declined. His range, if you believe anecdotal evidence, is now somewhere between Russ Davis and a guy in a Grimace costume. If stats are your thing, there's evidence that Renteria's fielding has been in a slow decline for a while. Sure, his offense was down last year, and a mid-30s player isn't always the best bet to rebound. And, yes, Renteria's signing yesterday would have cost the Giants a second-round pick, which seems like a poor investment for a rebuilding team. And...

Wait, where was I? Oh, right, why I was kind of excited yesterday. My if/and/then scenarios:

If Renteria is productive, and Burriss performs well in the minors or majors, then the Giants have a tradeable contract with Renteria if the Giants don't contend, or a productive veteran in the outside chance the Giants do contend.

If Renteria is a dud, and Burriss performs well in the minors or majors, then the Giants aren't out much. Renteria isn't the difference between Sabathia or no Sabathia, or the difference between a Lincecum extension or letting him walk.

If Renteria is a dud, and Burriss is a dud, then the team will have to find a shortstop somewhere else before they're good. Note this scenario would be the same without Renteria.

If Renteria is productive, and Burriss is a dud, then Sabean's lack of faith will look like a nice slice of goateed genius.

And I share that lack of faith in Burriss. I humbly apologize, but I can't help it. For five years, I've been yapping things like "play Todd Linden!"or "give Damon Minor a shot!", but when a young shortstop comes up and shows off a good glove and a .357 on-base percentage, suddenly I start backing away. But Burriss shouldn't have been in the majors last season. That he did better than expected was a huge boost to the youth movement, but his performance wasn't a likely one when considering that Burriss was just a year removed from playing his way out of San Jose.

Most importantly, if Burriss struggled -- we're talking a true sub-Mendoza, Bocock-blocking of the Giants' offense -- there wasn't another option. Ivan Ochoa? The actual Brian Bocock? Good gravy. And the options in next year's free agent class are miserable -- unless former Rated Rookies like Khalil Greene or Bobby Crosby are the types of reclamation prospects that shuck your oysters, there's absolutely nothing of value on the free agent market. Maybe the Giants could swing a trade, but either they would have to deal substantial pitching talent for a promising shortstop, or they would have to take a Burrissish chance on an unknown quantity.

The risk of Burriss struggling probably isn't worth a four-year deal to Furcal. The if/and/then scenario breaks down right away, as a broken and expensive Furcal would almost be as hard to trade as Barry Zito. The risk certainly isn't worth three- or four-years to Orlando Cabrera or Renteria. Those kind of contracts seem like recipes for future untradeable, unwatchable malcontents.

But two years? Suddenly, I'm thinking about how nice the offense would look if Renteria repeated his 2007 season. I'm thinking, great, now Burriss can get the development time in Fresno that he skipped, and Kevin Frandsen can finally get the put-up-or-shut-up season that his minor league career warrants. And if Renteria decomposes before our eyes, the deal isn't long enough to affect much of anything.

The difference between two years and three years to Edgar Renteria: surprisingly huge. I was already looking forward to the rest of the offseason. Now, I'm not especially looking forward to the eventual four-year, $40M deal that Renteria does sign with the Giants, but for a moment, the acquisition made sense.

 

Comment 130 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from McCovey Chronicles

Early Worries

Apr 2009 by Grant Brisbee - 249 comments

The 25-Man Roster...wait, what?

Mar 2009 by Grant Brisbee - 1247 comments

The 25-Man Roster

Mar 2009 by Grant Brisbee - 163 comments

Comments

Display:

None of that please

When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realized God doesn’t work that way, so I stole one and prayed for forgiveness. - Emo Philips

Neglectful father of David Quinowski

by marcello on Nov 25, 2008 12:06 PM PST up reply actions  

On a related note

I just watched a few selected minutes from Larry Flynt’s Sara Paylin meets Joe the unlicensed plumber…So i’ll be getting a kick out of these replies

Down in Front Meat!

by homerdrew415 on Nov 25, 2008 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

the hamburglar is actually quite spry
just ask Mayor McCheese

"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"

by The Gene Hackman on Nov 25, 2008 12:01 PM PST reply actions  

I got range!

Giants! Giants! HELP US GOD!

by j14 on Nov 25, 2008 12:05 PM PST reply actions  

Grimace has mad fielding skillz!

by Lars The Wanderer on Nov 25, 2008 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

3 years / 6 Million Milkshakes

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

that’s pretty funny

"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"

by The Gene Hackman on Nov 25, 2008 12:14 PM PST up reply actions  

It's only funny

until Scott Boras gets involved.

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

If Boras gets involved...

add a zero to the 6 million :-)

My adopted son Matt Downs. Lost in the wilderness of mediocrity.

by nvsfg on Nov 25, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I read that as Grimace-canseco. I would pay good money to see that, and I know canseco would do that for for good money.

by lincypoo i wuv u on Nov 25, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Rated WTF for..

Well….WTF.

The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."

by WalrusMan on Nov 25, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I just remeber that Family guy line

“The hamburgaler steals hamburgers, Grimace is Ronald McDonald’s retarded friend”

I see the future, and it is Pablo

by CB30 on Nov 25, 2008 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I might be alone, but seeing Grimace makes me think of Deivi Cruz playing SS

Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?

by Speedforthewin on Nov 25, 2008 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Made me think of Villalona

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Is Grimace doing the Goofus dance?

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Or was Goofus doing the Grimace dance?

whoa

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

You be the judge

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

What if Goofus was dancing while wearing a Grimace costume? What would happen?

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:28 PM PST up reply actions  

/headsplode

Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?

by Speedforthewin on Nov 25, 2008 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Think about it, man. Have you ever seen Goofus and Grimace in the same location at the same time?

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Dude! It’s like Shock G and Humpty!

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

goddammit

that throwback just made my afternoon

Dodgers fans eat their young.

by redhornet78 on Nov 25, 2008 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Or, like Kool Keith and Dr. Octagon.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I think that IF the renteria deal happens and is 2/18M, the Giants will be much better for it, mainly because SS would be taken care of while a 2B is sorted out, even if the 2B is merely a stopgap until Noonan arrives. Maybe in 2 years we go out and spend money on a SS again, but this seems like a smart move long term.

Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?

by Speedforthewin on Nov 25, 2008 12:09 PM PST reply actions  

Agree, agree, agree. Renteria at $18M/2Y would be a decent signing if it cost us a pick, a fantastic one if it didn’t.

People, this is not a small-market team. This is a team with money, and a team with an elite talent playing now. If you’re the Royals, you shrug and say, “Well, sucks we can’t surround the Cy Young winner with a team… hopefully a team will just show up in a couple years.” If you’re the Giants, that excuse should be beneath you. You should at least seriously consider the possibility of trying to contend every year. Our resources demand nothing less.

Affeldt greatly improves the outlook of the bullpen. Renteria would more than likely be a dramatic upgrade at shortstop. If we sign a good starter, our rotation goes from “intriguing” to outright elite. In the NL West, especially if Manny goes elsewhere, that could be enough to sneak us into the playoffs. We wouldn’t be great, but non-great teams can win in the playoffs… I don’t think Cardinals fans regret the aesthetics of their ’06 World Series title.

The goal of a baseball team is not to serve a youth movement or to meet the approval of the sabermetric cognoscenti. The goal of a baseball team is to win. If you’re a baseball team with enough cash to compete, you’d better have a pretty damn good reason to not shoot for a division title in a given year. The fact that we’re currently a below-average team is, frankly, not a good enough reason.

Things like the Affeldt deal and this theoreticall Renteria deal are the exact types of things that Sabean should be doing. There are ways to improve the present without hurting the future, and these are two good examples. I hope Sabean keeps looking for opportunities like this, because it’s a lot smarter than planning to suck till a couple prospects come around.

by onlxn on Nov 25, 2008 12:16 PM PST reply actions  

I agree with your points, I think my worry is that these moves are prelude to spending big cash on (Insert 6 yr/ 120M contract here). I have zero problems with building smartly, I am loving these 2 year deals. The 5 yr and 6yr and 7 yr ones hurt.

Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?

by Speedforthewin on Nov 25, 2008 12:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Short deals

Short deals certainly limit risk, but you don’t think the relatively short-term deals to Neifi Perez, Jose Vizcaino and Dave Roberts hurt? Not nearly as much as the Barry Zito deal, certainly, but the point is that make GOOD signings is what is important. The four deals mentioned above were all dumb deals the day they were done. Any HACK sabermetician could have told Brian Sabean he was making at BEST questionable moves.

If Furcal is healthy, he’s a very good player, contributing both offensively and defensively. Health is the issue here.

I expect Renteria to bounce back a bit next season, with an average closer to .300. But his glove seems to be declining, and just how much better is he likely to be than Kevin Frandsen or especially a semi-platoon of Frandsen and Eugenio Velez? Yes, I think Edgar will out hit Kevin by a bit, but will it be by enough to offset both Kevin’s better glove and his salary’s being somewhere around $8.5 million less? Doesn’t sound that way to me.

Renteria would certainly provide insurance should Burriss need more seasoning, which could well be the case. And it appears he could be had for only a two-year contract. But at $9 million per, does he really improve the Giants enough? Particularly when his fielding seems to be in decline and may not even be average.

My feeling has been that with the exception of an ailing bullpen, the Giants should sign the top free agents or not sign any at all. Renteria hasn’t changed my mind in that regard.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

apples to pears here

Renteria / Furcal don’t have to out hit Frandsen., they have to out hit Burriss.

What else are they going to spend the money on, Rog?

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 25, 2008 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

TAQUITOS!

The Denker bus is now bound for San Diego. Those who were passengers on it are now angrily stranded at a gas station in Modesto, CA. Not much about baseball here .

by oldjacket on Nov 25, 2008 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

i want some taquitos

"They can trade me," Bonds said. "I don't think they will, though. It's not like I want to be traded, man. I'm a Giant. I'm stuck here till the end."

by GameSix on Nov 26, 2008 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Damn1

Now I do too.

The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."

by WalrusMan on Nov 26, 2008 10:54 PM PST up reply actions  

well...

they could spend it on scouting, signing foreign players, or drafting some high profile talent in the lower rounds that might take extra dough to sign… but nah, the giants don’t need more young talent.

<\snark>

seriously though, i don’t have too huge of a problem with this. if it works out and renteria returns to his 06/07 offensive levels, it will be a very good signing. if it doesn’t… well, by the time the giants are competing again this won’t really be weighing us down.

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on Nov 26, 2008 1:17 AM PST up reply actions  

they could spend it on scouting, signing foreign players, or drafting some high profile talent in the lower rounds that might take extra dough to sign

I think they’ve been doing all those things at a pretty nice pace. You don’t? Sure they weren’t the high bidders on Dice K, but I thought that kind of combined money was crazy.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 26, 2008 8:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Exactly:
There are ways to improve the present without hurting the future.

by Dan from NM on Nov 25, 2008 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Well said

Completely agree. It’s stupid to just assume that the prospects will turn out, when the majority of them FAIL in the majors. Or don’t come close to reaching expectations.

As it stands it’s not like Burriss has a high ceiling offensively anyway. And there’s nothing to be sold with on Frandsen or Velez either….

Getting a guy who has been an All-Star in the NL when he’s played in this league is not a bad thing, especially when mostly everyone projects him to have a rebound next year.

Renteria may have poor range now, but I’m willing to bet that his hands and throwing are more reliable than young Burriss. Aurilia had poor range too, but he made the routine plays and provided above average production at SS back in the day. That was far more valuable than anything we’ve gotten since at that position.

by Hobbes2d on Nov 25, 2008 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Plus, as long as Velez isn’t starting at 2B, the starter there should have average (Franny) to above average (burriss) defense to mask some of Renteria’s defensive shortcomings

Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?

by Speedforthewin on Nov 25, 2008 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree

I hope Sabean keeps looking for opportunities like this, because it’s a lot smarter than planning to suck till a couple prospects come around.

Because even if you rebuild it they may never come

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m wondering besides Timmy, who else is the elite talent on our team? Also, we’ll lump in Cain to the elite group just for the sake of argument.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

No, we won’t… Cain’s very good, but not elite. I’m only talking about Timmy.

Timmy, by himself, is a good enough reason. We have perhaps the best young pitcher in baseball, and he may not be here forever. Why should a team with an above-average payroll ceiling piss that away? Because we don’t have Tampa Bay-level young talent? Because we’re sick of veterans? Because we think sucking for a couple years will magically make us better? Because we’re just so convinced that guys like friggin’ Nick Noonan are worth waiting for?

We are not the Royals. We are not the Marlins or the A’s. We have enough money to compete. The current combination of our talent and our money could make us competitive in 2009, and it wouldn’t have to hurt our chances in future years. Signing Renteria wouldn’t cost us Bumgarner or block a high-upside guy, and it might not even cost us a draft pick… it’d just cost ownership some money. What is so entertaining about seeing ownership keep their money?

Any Giants fan that wants us to punt on a season for its own sake needs to take a step back. We want these guys to win, don’t we?

by onlxn on Nov 25, 2008 12:32 PM PST up reply actions  

We are not the Marlins

Wouln’t mind their two rings the last decade or so

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah no kidding. Then I wouldn’t have to show up to a game ever again just like Marlins fans.

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, also, the Royals, A’s, and Marlins have all won the World Series in the last 50 years.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, also, the Royals, A’s, and Marlins have all won the World Series in the last 50 23 years.

Bonds stands alone.

Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal

by nostocksjustbonds on Nov 25, 2008 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Be patient

Jeepneys will soon be rolling up to the new downtown stadium in 2012 witha 37,000 capacity. This location should do wonders for the organization.

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Timmy & Geno

Will be leading that caravan

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

We have enough money to compete.

The problem with this logic, in my opinion, is that while we do have a significantly higher payroll than the teams you mentioned, and a few others, we’re not in the top tier either. Which means we can’t go out and get the cream of the crop free agents every year, like the Yanks or Red Sox or Mets can. So we generally either have to get one or two elite FA every couple of years and surround them with cheap, young players, or we can spend on the mid-range FA market. Of course, spending on the mid-range is what Sabean has done for most of his tenure, and we’ve seen how it has worked lately.

And when they did spend big for an “elite” free agent signing, they picked Zito.

Go Giants!

by The Double Deuce on Nov 25, 2008 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

This.

No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.

by Kitspool on Nov 25, 2008 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

We are, indeed, not in the top tier of payrolls. I’m not convinced we couldn’t be — the team brings in a fair amount of revenue — but it seems like 90 million will continue to be the ceiling for the foreseeable the future.

Thing is, we don’t actually have to compete with the Yankees and Red Sox and Mets. We just have to compete with the Dodgers and Rockies and Padres and D-Backs. Only one of those teams has deeper pockets than we do; the other three, in fact, have significantly shallower pockets than we do.

I’m not saying the Giants are in a position to grab Teixeira and Sabathia and whoever the hell they want, and I’m not saying they should do that if they could. I’m saying, we’re the second-biggest fish in the only truly relevant pond, that being the NL West. If we can afford, say, Derek Lowe and Edgar Renteria and Joe Beimel, and if those three can put us close to contending, shouldn’t we consider that?

by onlxn on Nov 25, 2008 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Consider it? Sure. Do it? That depends.

Renteria for two years seems like a solid move. If he wants more years than that, we have to be willing to say no thank you. Same for Lowe and Beimel. The main key, I think, is to stop getting locked into these long term deals with mediocre/marginal-upgrade talent (Rowand, for example). If mediocre players are asking for lots of years, Sabean has to be willing to say “nevermind, no thanks, we’ll go with internal options instead”. He has shown an inability to do that, though.

As bad as some of Coletti’s contracts have turned out for the Dodgers, he had the right idea with Schmidt and A.Jones, by signing them for slightly more money but fewer years. Those two blew up in his face, but I think the logic was sound.

by The Double Deuce on Nov 25, 2008 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I generally agree, though I think it’s easy to overstate the wisdom of big money for fewer years. In the case of Derek Lower, for instance, I really don’t think we’d come to regret a four-year deal at market price… pitchers aren’t sure bets to degrade the way hitters are. A guy like Derek Lowe can be an asset no matter how the young ’uns develop.

by onlxn on Nov 25, 2008 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but what is “market price” going to be for Lowe? Both the Yanks and Red Sox have said they’re interested in him. So I seriously doubt we’d be able to get him at a reasonable price. Why would he want to come here when he could go to a serious contender, unless we offered him an above-market deal?

A four year deal for a 36 year old pitcher is never a good idea either, even if he hasn’t shown signs of degradation yet.

by The Double Deuce on Nov 25, 2008 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Both the Yanks and Red Sox are also interested in a good number of other starters as well… one of them will probably be left out in the cold. If the Yanks land CC and the Sox trade for Peavy, for instance, where is Lowe’s money coming from? Maybe the Dodgers, maybe the Mets, but maybe us.

I’m not saying we should be married to Derek Lowe, specifically. I’m saying there is talent available for money. We shouldn’t overpay Zito-style for anyone, but paying is okay. Committing four years to a solid, reliable pitcher would be okay. We shouldn’t be allergic to that just because we have visions of Lincecum/Cain/Sanchez/Bumgarner/Alderson dancing in our heads.

by onlxn on Nov 25, 2008 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

An elite talent is singular and I’m assuming it’s Timmy.

I liked Grant’s post a lot and onlxn’s response as well. I also felt a slight shift in momentum on this site—it has the faint aroma of confidence—or is it bacon?

(Did I get the crux of all those apostrophes right?)

They say some players get out of bed hitting; Pablo Sandoval doesn't wait that long

by bgunn on Nov 25, 2008 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I read it as ‘talents’ for whatever reason. Head colds are cool!

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m with you on the head cold—I’ve been living on Thera-Flu and Fernet shots for too long now.

They say some players get out of bed hitting; Pablo Sandoval doesn't wait that long

by bgunn on Nov 25, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

You haven’t lived until you’ve tried DayQuil. I swear it’s slightly hallucinogenic.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Hallucinogenic?

I’m not sure I want an hallucinogen, but I am about to take some DayQuil for my cold. If I’m not here for a while, you will know I have risen above it all.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 1:54 PM PST up reply actions  

That looks terrifying. I dont like to eat things with more fat than I have and that look like it might get up and eat my face off.

by lincypoo i wuv u on Nov 25, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Elite

I don’t think the Giants have any elite talent at the major league level aside from Tim Lincecum. It does appear that Madison Bumgarner, Buster Posey and Angel Villallona have the potential to reach that level, and certainly Matt Cain and Brian Wilson are at least potential All-Stars, as Wilson already was last season. Pablo Sandoval appears to have the ability to hit anywhere from well to VERY well as a catcher.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Pablo Sandoval appears to have the ability to hit anywhere from well to VERY well as a catcher.

That would be truly amazing. I’d settle for him hitting well to VERY well as a batter.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I don’t really disagree, but is there any indication that the team is actually eager to compete? I get the feeling that they’re content to tread water. It’s a long way from 72 wins to 90, or even 86.

by Evan on Nov 25, 2008 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Eager

I think the Giants are indeed eager to compete. All they lack is the talent to do so.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 1:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree. The “gamer” thing was overplayed, but I do think the team is headed in the right direction. I believe both management and the personnel all have a desire to compete.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure; I just mean that they seem reconciled to the fact (much like most of us here) that they’re neither good nor close to being good. Acquiring players like Rowand and Renteria isn’t building for the short term and it isn’t building for the long term. Rather, it’s trying to stay respectable and not lose too many fans while waiting for all the hot prospects to arrive.

by Evan on Nov 25, 2008 2:21 PM PST up reply actions  

In a vaccum, yes, but if they get Renteria and Texiera, would you still be saying that?

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 2:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, of course, but that’s kind of my point. Is there any indication that Sabean is even kicking Teixeira’s tires?

by Evan on Nov 25, 2008 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Si

The Giants have investigated the biggest free-agent hitter, Mark Teixeira, but believe he wants to play back East. Still unclear is whether the Giants will look into a second-tier hitter such as Adam Dunn, who would provide much-needed pop to the lineup at the expense of defense.

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Neukom said so

He said the Giants goal in 2009 is to be competitive, in 2010 to be contending, if I recall correctly.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Preach it brother onixn!

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 25, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s well put, but if the opportunity doesn’t present itself (Teixeira at a reasonable contract, trading pitching for a quality return), then don’t force anything just for the sake of doing something. That’s how we ended up with Zito.

Don't think, it could only hurt the ballclub.

by ResDog on Nov 25, 2008 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree with that. But let’s remember, Zito

A) was a stupid signing to begin with, and
B) has gotten much, much worse than anyone could’ve expected.

Barry Zito is not the norm in free agency. His contract is a horrible, horrible outlier.

Look at Aaron Rowand. Rowand brought us skills we didn’t particularly lack, and he didn’t have a good season. Are we in a worse position as a result of his contract? Not at all, in fact, because Sabean got a good player at market price. There are a number of teams who would be okay with Aaron Rowand at that price… if we wanted to, we could probably trade him without eating a penny in salary. We probably won’t, because it looks strange to trade a guy a year after signing him, but we could. Rowand was a good player at market price. Zito was a good player at a wildly inflated price, who then stopped being good.

Free agency isn’t always an efficient way to improve, but it’s pretty rare for a team to be flat-out stuck with a non-asset, in the way that we’re stuck with Zito. Fear of that can’t dominate the Giants’ thinking.

by onlxn on Nov 25, 2008 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Forget appearances

There are a number of teams who would be okay with Aaron Rowand at that price… if we wanted to, we could probably trade him without eating a penny in salary. We probably won’t, because it looks strange to trade a guy a year after signing him,

Trade him.

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Well said. It’s hard to go wrong with a two-year deal. I like Burriss, but I don’t like him like him.

The scenarios you outlined are reasonable. I’d feel better counting on two out of the Renteria-Burriss-Frandsen trio working out, rather than hoping for both the kids to come through without much backup.

And he’s getting in the best shape of his life, says his agent!

by Dan from NM on Nov 25, 2008 12:17 PM PST reply actions  

That's true

I guess the only reason I liked Burris is because he was better than Bocock and Ochoa. That’s not saying much, but there’s my logic.

Plus he can man 2nd and SS in a pinch.

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

you mean the speed and defense mantra didn’t hook you?

Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?

by Speedforthewin on Nov 25, 2008 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

The what and what mantra? I don’t understand Sabeanese.

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

If

If Emmanuel can man TWO positions simultaneously, I may have to fore go my reservations about his hitting.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

/nods

I think we will be able to compete in 2010, good hitting SS’s are not easy to find. Hence, I’m okay with either Renteria for two years or Furcal for 3-4.

The Denker bus is now bound for San Diego. Those who were passengers on it are now angrily stranded at a gas station in Modesto, CA. Not much about baseball here .

by oldjacket on Nov 25, 2008 12:19 PM PST reply actions  

Edgar winz teh World Seriez!!

He has more moxy than Furcal.

Charlie Hayes ate my homework

by glenallen hill's waterpipe on Nov 25, 2008 9:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I was looking forward to saying “Omar would’ve had that”

Adopted son of in limbo Brad Hennessey. Beloved for a stolen base much like Dave Roberts

by AndYourBirdCanSing on Nov 25, 2008 12:33 PM PST reply actions  

to be accompanied with “Omar wouldn’t have hit that”

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Please stop insulting Edgar’s wife. I’m sure she’s lovely.

Adopted son of in limbo Brad Hennessey. Beloved for a stolen base much like Dave Roberts

by AndYourBirdCanSing on Nov 25, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Back when

Once when Willie Mays hit a triple, Bob Stevens wrote in the Chronicle of the extra base hit, “The only guy who could have caught it, hit it.”

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Just because Willie Mays is teh awesome

Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil

by SoFa King Mike on Nov 25, 2008 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I know Mays is the most awesome thing ever, but that particular swing was particularly ugly.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

He's taking BP..

In front of a camera squad and not a soul within miles of the stadium probably.

The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."

by WalrusMan on Nov 25, 2008 3:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I suppose

I guess I’m much more impressed with how after he hits it, he’s so fast that he’s already out in the field waiting on the ball.

Dude was good.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 26, 2008 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

or “a bag of moist concrete would have had that.”

The Denker bus is now bound for San Diego. Those who were passengers on it are now angrily stranded at a gas station in Modesto, CA. Not much about baseball here .

by oldjacket on Nov 25, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Bengie Molina would have had that.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

a sandwich?

The Denker bus is now bound for San Diego. Those who were passengers on it are now angrily stranded at a gas station in Modesto, CA. Not much about baseball here .

by oldjacket on Nov 25, 2008 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

A Hero?

Adopted son of in limbo Brad Hennessey. Beloved for a stolen base much like Dave Roberts

by AndYourBirdCanSing on Nov 25, 2008 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

The Denker bus is now bound for San Diego. Those who were passengers on it are now angrily stranded at a gas station in Modesto, CA. Not much about baseball here .

by oldjacket on Nov 25, 2008 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

We call ’em hoagies.

/EAST COAST FTW

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I call them delicious.

There amass been plenty of articles written this spring about the stud shortstop Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum , as well as the fluid young outfielders and thirteen basemen Kevin Frandsen.
comics | art | Nattowear | McFAQ I & II

by Natto on Nov 25, 2008 12:49 PM PST up reply actions  

And if Renteria decomposes before our eyes, the deal isn’t long enough to affect much of anything.

Should I be worried that reading that made me think of that one scene in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?

Anagram of "Giants pitcher Tim Lincecum" = TENSE, CLIMACTIC, TRIUMPHING

by Stuttering John Tamargo on Nov 25, 2008 1:17 PM PST reply actions  

You chose poorly.

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 25, 2008 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I was actually thinking of when the nazis explode in blood and whatnot. God that trilogy was awesome, decomposing bodies are a lost art in hollywood these days sigh… stupid crystal skull bs

by lincypoo i wuv u on Nov 25, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s Raiders.

There amass been plenty of articles written this spring about the stud shortstop Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum , as well as the fluid young outfielders and thirteen basemen Kevin Frandsen.
comics | art | Nattowear | McFAQ I & II

by Natto on Nov 25, 2008 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I’m pretty cool with Renteria for 2 years, and probably Furcal for 3/36, but I do think there are other options. I don’t necessarily buy this:

Maybe the Giants could swing a trade, but either they would have to deal substantial pitching talent for a promising shortstop, or they would have to take a Burrissish chance on an unknown quantity.

I’ve proposed a deal for the Cubs Ronny Cedeno – shit, just today they were talking about getting Fontenot playing time at ss, and Theriot is already there – and GRM (I think) was talking about dealing for Lillibridge in Atlanta. Neither of these guys has done much in the bigs, but they’re young and talented without being “Burrissish” (a couple of levels above where they’re meant to be). And it wouldn’t seem that you’d need to deal promising young pitching for them.

Wouldn’t something along these lines do?

by BigO on Nov 25, 2008 1:40 PM PST reply actions  

The Angels have three shortstops – Erick Aybar, Maicer Izturis and Brandon Wood.

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 1:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Cedeno is still an unknown. I’d love to trade for him, but I know Sabean isn’t going acquire one unknown just to start him over another. Plus, even though he’s still just 25, his ML-career is still .252/.289/.350 in over 900 at-bats. Maybe the BA-driven AAA success is more of what to expect, but I would still file him under “unknown.”

And Lillibridge was awful last year. I’d rather start Burriss.

by Grant Brisbee on Nov 25, 2008 2:34 PM PST up reply actions  

oh sure

NOW you invoke the Sabeanalistic clause.

by BigO on Nov 25, 2008 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Cedeno & Marquis ( if still in their dog house) or Dick Tidrow approved spare farm arm ( if Marquis is not in their dog house enough) for Winn should be directly up Sabeans M.O. he is getting a 2 for 1 and the second being a lot nearer to majors then and of compensation Pick(s) in 2010. Though Sabean would probably fiddle fart around tell August before making that trade.

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 25, 2008 6:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I think you could afford to

trade something to pick up a young good-field maybe hit SS… if you were relatively solid around the rest of the IF.
Unless you think you can get one for basically a sandwich draft pick type player.

But frankly, SS is by far the weakest position on the Giants, and other than Hudson who is likely to be extremely overpaid and not a short term contact, there are not any 3B/2B worth signing. (1B is an aside since they need Dunn/Burrell/Tex anyway).

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 25, 2008 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm vacillating...

One day the thought of Edgar Renteria in a Giants uniform has me smiling beatifically like broadcasting legend Hugh Downs all hopped up on his heart attack meds. The next day the thought of another declining, aging shortstop blocking a legitimate prospect has me feeling like that poor, terrified mother holding her sweet infant baby while looking for all the world exactly like Ozzy Ozbourne.

Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??

by tobias on Nov 25, 2008 1:44 PM PST reply actions  

Money and other SS options aside, what are the chances Renteria returns to his 2007 form (or even close) both offensively and defensively? It’s not a huge risk at 2 years/$18M but it also strikes me as an investment based on wishful thinking—“He’s due for another great offensive season!” “He’ll feel more comfortable being back in the National League!!”

No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.

by Kitspool on Nov 25, 2008 2:07 PM PST reply actions  

How about: his batting peripherals in 2008 was similar to his career

His strikeout rate and BB/K ratio were basically that of his career or better, and yet his batting line went way down. That suggests that his low BABIP was due to random bad luck because he was swinging his bat the same as he has always done but it just didn’t produce in 2008.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Good, bad. ugly

The good news is that Edgar Renteria’s K rate has declined each of the past three seasons and that his batting average should pop up closer to .300. The bad news is that his power and fielding are declining. The ugly news is that it costs $9 million a year for a shortstop who is above-average offensively but below average defensively and who is declining at an unknown rate.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 11:24 PM PST up reply actions  

and could always shift him to third base.

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 25, 2008 6:31 PM PST up reply actions  

The thing is a Renteria signing in an of itself is not going to do much

The team won 72 games last year and still outplayed their pythag by 4 wins. You can probably expect improvement from some players (Rowand, Sanchez) but also some players are likely to fall a bit (Winn, Molina). A Renteria signing in and of itself is not going to do much, and it would be more productive to punt this position in favor of trying to find a SS who could be useful when the team could be good again (like the Lillibridge mentioned above) or sign someone who’s likely to be at least average like Rafael Furcal.

If it’s paired with something like a CC or Tex signing then it makes more sense.

Can't get enough of the Oakland A's or Golden State Warriors? Visit Oaktown Awesomer's and Golden Stat Hoops

by iamawesomer on Nov 25, 2008 2:15 PM PST reply actions  

Texiera is like a Pinot Noir. You can pretty much pair him with anything and it makes more sense.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Read SF thinks Tex wants to be paired with the East Coast

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Texiera is like a Pinot Noir

Now that’s sabermetrics even I can understand.

I’ll take a magnum of Teixeira.

They say some players get out of bed hitting; Pablo Sandoval doesn't wait that long

by bgunn on Nov 25, 2008 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Even Teixeira

Although he probably would be my number one choice to sign, even Mark Teixeira wouldn’t be likely to make the Giants a contender in 2009. I really like the idea of signing him, although that doesn’t seem to be feasible.

The only negative to signing Mark, beyond the obvious cost, might be that expectations could be raised to unattainable levels. Perhaps the best thing for the Giants’ attendance right now is that expectations are low as long as the youngsters are playing. It appears fans can live with a mediocre-at-best team as long as that team is young and perceived as developing at a rapid rate.

I think some of the major league youngsters are good candidates to disappoint next season, but the really good American players aren’t too far away .

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 11:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Tex (or Dunn or Burrell)

plus a ML average SS and this team is very close to .500.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 26, 2008 8:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Why is Burriss automatically "above" where he should be?

Just because he was in A-ball the year before. I’m not saying he is the same as Justin Upton, but he was in A-ball the year before he made the majors and only AA that year as well. He never saw AAA before becoming the starter for Arizona.

Now looking at Bocock’s numbers, he clearly was above where he should be, he was striking out right and left and right again, then left again. He was totally lost.

Burriss, however, clearly was not overmatched in the majors even when he was struggling in his first call-up. He struck out only 12 times in 112 AB in the first half, walking 8 times. Only the better hitters around can do that.

He then upped it in the second half, with 12 strikeouts in 128 AB plus 15 walks. Only the best hitters around can do that. Batters with that profile, according to Baseball Forecaster data, on average hit around .280-.290, resulting in an OBP above .350, which is good for a leadoff type hitter.

Of course, small samples, but he did it in the majors when given the chance all season long, there was not a month where he truly struggled with strikeouts.

And, of course, it’s no guarantee that he’ll do well in 2009, but his peripherals was that of a good hitter, and he performed when given the chance, and he had similar peripherals when he was in the minors. So if he continues it while in the majors, I would say that he’s probably where he should be.

Now, all that means squat if he don’t perform in spring training and win the position outright, but at minimum, it means that he has demonstrated the skills that a major leaguer should possess and should be given the chance to win a spot in the majors in 2009. Which is where he’s at right now.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 5:01 PM PST reply actions  

low k/bb ratio is not all that relevant for batters

In fact its not “the better hitters” that post low k and bb numbers like that, its the Juan Pierres and Omar Vizquel’s of the league.

Can't get enough of the Oakland A's or Golden State Warriors? Visit Oaktown Awesomer's and Golden Stat Hoops

by iamawesomer on Nov 25, 2008 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

But isn't that Burriss' ceiling?

A .280 average & a .340 obp with a good glove at short sounds good to me. IF he can do that (or close to it) in 2009 in the bigs then I think he should be starting at shortstop.

Don't think, it could only hurt the ballclub.

by ResDog on Nov 25, 2008 6:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, but how likely is that?

This is why the short term deal (for Renteria or whomever is key).
Burriss starts at SS/AAA. Rent-a-ss starts in the bigs. If Burriss is hot in AAA, bring him and and put him at 2B, If he’s not hitting better than Frandsen/Velez, then either we have a glorious bounty of middle infielders with some stick, or they all are bad and so what.

The flip side is that if you start Burriss, and he goes all Bocock on us (quite likely) then what’s your plan B? Ivan Ochoa?

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 26, 2008 8:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Power

When I look at K/BB ratios, I look at them in the context of power. Power hitters usually strike out a lot, but they also have that power and often walk a lot. The less the power, the lower the K/BB ratio I’m looking for.

The problem with a guy who doesn’t strike out much but also doesn’t walk much is that each of those strikeouts cost only about 3/10th of a hit. A lost walk is a base not taken and the loss of a full out.

Emmanuel Burriss doesn’t strike out much, which is good. He also hasn’t walked a lot, which isn’t so good. But he did hit a streak in late August or so where he was walking a lot, so hopefully he can retain a good portion of that.

Also, he made more progress in a short time from the left side than anyone I can recall seeing.

Bottom line, Emmanuel already appears to be an above-average fielder at second base, which augurs well for his being able to eventually achieve that status at shorstop. His improvement from the left side was impressive and much needed. If Manny is to have offensive value to the Giants, he will need to draw a lot of walks, getting on base in order to take advantage of his speed. He probably isn’t going to hit for a lot of average, and I would be shocked if he ever hit for any power.

At all levels, Manny has averaged about two extra bases for every 11 hits. By comparison, Omar Vizquel averaged about four extra bases for every 12 hits. Omar had no power, yet he was almost twice as powerful as Manny.

If Emmanuel can reach base 35% of the time and become an above-average shortstop in the field, he can be an asset. If not, he will be pretty much a place holder.

When you make Omar Vizquel look like a power hitter, you’d better field somewhat like him and get on base a lot. If not, you should try to become the best utility infielder you can be.

by sharksrog on Nov 25, 2008 11:41 PM PST up reply actions  

If Burriss and do that he's not just an asset, he's almost like Yunel Escobar

Which can come pretty close to netting you Jake Peavy. I don’t think Burriss has much of a chance at that but kudos to him if he can.

Can't get enough of the Oakland A's or Golden State Warriors? Visit Oaktown Awesomer's and Golden Stat Hoops

by iamawesomer on Nov 25, 2008 11:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I think we’ve all learned that the we should only trust Milwaukee radio stations, not New York.

There amass been plenty of articles written this spring about the stud shortstop Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum , as well as the fluid young outfielders and thirteen basemen Kevin Frandsen.
comics | art | Nattowear | McFAQ I & II

by Natto on Nov 26, 2008 6:03 PM PST reply actions  

I only trust rumors that are broken by MadBomber.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 27, 2008 6:31 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List: The Results
Giantslogo_2286_3_small
Nerbs headed to Seattle
Carlosicon_small
Giants Prospect Lists

Recent FanPosts

Bobby_small
Brian F#@king Wilson
Untitled1_small
Bloggers interview Sabean and Bochy on Media Day
Dora_small
Spring training guide posted at McWiki
Small
McCoven World Series Brick Location
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List #44
Bobby_small
If your name was Brian Sabean....
Img_0100_small
Predict when a catching prospect gets traded
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List #43
Calvin_and_hobbes_small
Community Prospect List #42

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant Brisbee

Moderators

Minime_small Natto

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Goofus_small Goofus

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Det_7193_small jponry

Authors

09_small JT Jordan

Small steve S