McCovey Chronicles: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Renteria might have signed, postering could be to save draft pick

This is pure speculation but it is quite possible Renteria HAS in fact agreed to terms with the Giants, but this recent leak about the deal "not being done" could be a ploy the Giants are using to save a pick.

A few years ago, when Gary Sheffield signed with the Yankees it was leaked early on he signed for 3 years, 39 million. However, the Yankees used press leaks to deny this claim which in turn led to Atlanta DECLINING Sheffield arbitration. The Yankees knew that if Sheffield was unsigned by the arbitration offering deadline, ATL would decline, and in doing so save the Yankees a draft pick.

Days after the arbitration deadline, the Yanks made the signing official.

 

I'm not saying that is the case here, but it is indeed possible. Renteria might have agreed to terms and they will wait to make it official until Detroit declines him arbitration

This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.

0 recs  |  Comment 71 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Or maybe WFAN isn’t a trustworthy source.

by Dan from NM on Nov 24, 2008 4:53 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

let's hope nobody from the Tigers blog reads this

if I was them I would offer him arbitration and take my chances.

by FluLikeSymptoms on Nov 24, 2008 4:54 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Dear Tigers' Brass

This isn’t the post you’re looking for. You can go about your business. Move along.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 24, 2008 4:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Arbitration

ITS A TRAP!

I see the future, and it is Pablo

by CB30 on Nov 24, 2008 5:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Doo Doo Doo Doo Do Doo Dooo, Doo Do Do Doo Do Do Do Dooo Doooo

The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."

by WalrusMan on Nov 24, 2008 6:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Your draft pick will become one, with the Tigers.

—signed, Locutus Sabean

it's always noonan somewhere

by sectionop92 on Nov 24, 2008 9:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We are the SabeanBorg

Drafting is futile.

Am I mad, in a coma, or back in time? Whatever's happened, it's like I've landed on a different planet. Now, maybe if I can work out the reason, I can get home.

by Lyle on Nov 25, 2008 6:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tigers would be idiots to offer arbitration

They could have had him for $12M. They paid him $3M to go away. If they offer arbitration, Renteria would Maddux their butt in a nano-second and accept it because he made $10M last season and while his stats were not in line with career, it was still around average for a SS, above average for an AL SS, so he can ask for at least $10M and end up $1M ahead of the $12M the Tigers could have optioned him for. He probably could ask for $11M given his good stats, as arbitrators appear to favor OKing raises to players who do well.

That would make the Tigers look pretty dumb, and Dombrowski has not been a dumb GM, not for the Tigers, not for the Marlins, not for the Expos. If I had my choice of any GM, I would chose Dombrowski. I’m sure he has probably thought about what to do about offering arbitration and it just doesn’t make sense, they could had had him for an extra $9M and going through arbitration would cost at least $10M because that’s what he made in 2008 and he didn’t do anything to warrant a drop in salary. If the Tigers tip their hand and suggest that to his agent, I would then push it and ask for $12M, as the arbitration would still select the $12M since a decrease is not warranted. The arbitration system is skewed to the players, pushing it higher when teams make a mistake with their offers, like with Ryan Howard.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 11:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The arbitration system is absolutely not skewed in favor of the players. Owners win a vast majority of the very few cases that actually go to arbitration, they have won 279 and players have won only 203 since the process started in 1974. The thing that made Ryan Howard’s case so notable was that it was such a rare win for the players, it was one of only 2 cases they won last year, while the owners won the other 6 (the owners record was 4-2 on 2007).

Also, if you were Edgar Renteria would you really chose to make something like $11million for one year over a guarantee of $18 million for 2 years. Maybe you would take the 1 year deal if you were 27, but at age 33 I’m thinking he would choose the 2 year deal.

If the Tigers believe this report at all, the would be stupid not to offer him arbitration. But all the being said, their only potential benefit is a 2nd round draft pick (probably somewhere around 50th overall) so it might not be worth any risk whatsoever to them just to get the 50th pick.

by FluLikeSymptoms on Nov 25, 2008 12:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What happens to the cases that do not go to arbitration but where the two sides settle? This raises the players salary.

by wilriv21 on Nov 25, 2008 12:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Usually, however, the player’s salary does go up quite a bit. I don’t see an arbiter giving Renteria “only” $7 or $8 mil after they year he had. While the owners have won more cases, it’s hard to say the players haven’t benefited greatly.

by tyrannoman on Dec 1, 2008 8:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the players have certainly benefited from the arbitration system, but that is because (as willriv points out) so few of the cases actually go to arbitration. The point here is, how much can you realistically see Renteria getting if he went to arbitration? I can’t imagine he gets more than $11 million. So then the question becomes, if you are Renteria, a 33 year old shortstop, would you rather have a 1 year $11 million contract or a 2 year, $18 million contract? I think the 2 year deal is clearly superior in his situation.

by FluLikeSymptoms on Dec 1, 2008 11:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Unless you’re looking at the 1-year deal as an opportunity to re-establish your value.

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Dec 1, 2008 12:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That would be nice if we could save the draft pick. That, and not too many years, would make me ok with the signing, if it does happen.

Less arm, more talk. Raisingcain is a GAMER.
Adopted Giant: Henry Sosa

by raisingcain on Nov 24, 2008 5:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It’s funny that you post this because I had the same thought when I saw Schulman’s post refuting the signing. It wouldn’t seem to make sense that the Giants would sign him now, seeing as the time to offer a player arbitration is like a week away. I doubt that Renteria was in such high demand that the Giants felt they absolutely positively needed to sign him now, losing a draft pick in the process.

by deuce deuce on Nov 24, 2008 5:22 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

right, the only way that kinda made sense was if, as someone in grant’s thread speculated, the signing was also designed to help us get cc sabathia. if the Giants thought they really had a chance to get a deal done with sabathia quickly if they signed renteria first, then it would make sense because it would effectively only cost us a 3rd round pick (because cc is going to cost us our 2nd rounder no matter what if we sign him).

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on Nov 24, 2008 5:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Just curious

Did you mean “posturing”? Or perhaps “posterizing”?

There amass been plenty of articles written this spring about the stud shortstop Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum , as well as the fluid young outfielders and thirteen basemen Kevin Frandsen.
comics | art | Nattowear | McFAQ I & II

by Natto on Nov 24, 2008 5:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs


Sabean has mastered the art of posterizing.

by rightcenterfielder on Nov 24, 2008 7:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Does this mean that Sabes is now “iconic”?

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 9:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

or still just “colonic”?

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 9:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Whichever one involves Baron Davis

I see the future, and it is Pablo

by CB30 on Nov 24, 2008 9:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Given that a leak of this nature is pretty likely to be true

why would the Tigers NOT offer arbitration? As a poster said earlier, I would take my chances if I were the Tigers and offer arbitration, especially if they were pretty certain from the results of their negotiations with Renteria that he is going to sign elsewhere.

Overall, I’m ok with the signing if it allows Burriss and Crawford more time to develop in the minors.

by baseballjunkie on Nov 24, 2008 5:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Well, as Andy Baggarly stated in his blog post, the Tigers already paid Renteria $3 million to buy out his 2009 option. So the Tigers would have to be 100% positive that the Giants (or some other team for that matter) are going to offer him a multiple year contract. Otherwise, the Tigers would essentially be paying him an extra $3 million on top of whatever he would make in arbitration.

by deuce deuce on Nov 24, 2008 6:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As I noted above

Tigers would be stupid to offer arbitration. Renteria would love the chance to get paid more than the $9M (assuming that is true) because he’s not getting a paycut in arbitration and he got $10M last year.

Plus, this gives him a chance to do better in 2009 and lead to a better contract offer in 2010. That’s win-win for him unless a team offers him more like $20-22M for two years.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 11:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Renteria's sucky 2008 pretty much assures that he'd be getting a paycut in arbitration

in addition to the annoyance of playing for a non-guaranteed contract.

Not a chance. BTW, he’s getting that $3 million come hell or high water, so it’s totally irrelevant to the discussion.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Nov 25, 2008 7:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rafael Furcal’s agent said he talked to the Giants’ tonight about a contract. They would probably keep a Renteria signing secret to keep the Tigers’ from offering arbitration, but I seriously doubt they would continue to negotiate with other shortstops. That would be a bit elaborate. Besides, why would WFAN in New York be the only source to get this info??

Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment

by rxmeister on Nov 24, 2008 6:49 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Because New York is the only place where sports happens!

You probably know it as MYANMAR, but it will always be BURMA to me!

by NuschlerFace on Nov 24, 2008 6:50 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

NOT TRUE!!!

Last night I was watching my beloved Jayhawks, and the crawl on ESPN2 said that the Red Sox may or may not have offered a 1 year contract to Veritek…thus proving that sports happens in Boston as well. Outside of New York and Boston, however, there are no sports at all.

by tyrannoman on Nov 25, 2008 9:01 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Granted this is pure speculation.

As to the theoretical question why would the Giants be talking with another SS if Renteria is in the fold? You have seen what we been calling Third base recently. From what I’ve read and the Small Sample Sized I’ve seen is mainly Renteria’s range that is going down hill.

/shurgs

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 24, 2008 7:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

agree

Love the capitalized alliteration also

I see the future, and it is Pablo

by CB30 on Nov 24, 2008 9:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait

Couldn’t the Furcal rumors just be a smoke screen so that the Tigers aren’t assured that the Giants are going to sign Renteria?

That makes more sense to me:

  • Giants plan on signing Renteria after arb deadline
  • Giants float rumor that they’re in the hunt for Furcal
  • Tigers aren’t confident that Renteria is going to be signed by the Giants, so they don’t offer arb
  • Giants keep their pick, giving McCoven less to whine about

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 9:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If only EVERYTHING the Giants did was to appease the McCoven. That’s pretty much my biggest fantasy that doesn’t involve Beyonce or Kelly Macdonald.

No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.

by Kitspool on Nov 25, 2008 10:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How about Beyonce AND Kelly?

There amass been plenty of articles written this spring about the stud shortstop Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum , as well as the fluid young outfielders and thirteen basemen Kevin Frandsen.
comics | art | Nattowear | McFAQ I & II

by Natto on Nov 25, 2008 11:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thick

Ralph Barbieri, heal thyself.

by ThrillisGone22 on Nov 30, 2008 12:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

On #3: Considering the Tigers paid 3M to end his old contract ( 11MM for 2009) and I think the most team favorable Arbitration rule cut a guys wages by a maximum 80% ( 9M *.8 = 7.2M +3M buy out = 10.2M to play in ’09 for the Tigers) it would mean the Tigers at best case save .8M and in none best case end up paying more the 11M. I just don’t see the Tigers thinking the candle is would the game here.

Re #4: Less whine but more cheese to cut !?!?

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 25, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

thank you. Looks like i have some more re-readng to do.

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 30, 2008 9:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

too make it appear legit

agents use teams to drive up the price of their clients, why wouldn’t teams use agents to make their stories fit?

by NeifiChicken on Nov 24, 2008 8:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Renteria’s agent supposedly told a St. Louis paper that he wouldn’t sign anywhere without telling the Cardinals he’s about to sign, because the Cardinals are his true preference. The Cardinals are definitely interested in him, and I doubt a 2 yr 18 million dollar offer would scare them away.

Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment

by rxmeister on Nov 24, 2008 7:11 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I thought the split on bad terms sothats intresting. Thanks for the info.

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 24, 2008 7:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

just to back up rxmeister

doubling back and giving fair warning

I don’t know how I feel about this. Now I am a huge Cards fan, and I kinda like the idea of Edgar coming back, but I still have my doubts about him…what to think, what to think

Since I like the Giants too, I wouldn’t be upset if he ended up out there.

Oh yeah…I just have to ask, otherwise the VEBers might get upset at me.

You guys really looking for a LH hitting First Baseman?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Nov 25, 2008 4:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Only if he’s better than Travis Ishikawa.

The Denker bus is now bound for San Diego. Those who were passengers on it are now angrily stranded at a gas station in Modesto, CA. Not much about baseball here .

by oldjacket on Nov 25, 2008 5:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Awful signing

God I hope this doesn’t happen. Burriss would be better than Renteria both offensively and defensively. Renteria is going to be 34, he covers about 6 inches at this point, he’d cost a 2nd round pick and he’s not even a major offensive upgrade over Burriss. Does anyone have his +/- for the last 3 years from Jim Dewan’s fielding bible? I can’t find it there but according to baseball Prospectus he was -22 in 2005 and I heard he was god-awful last year as well. I hated the Rowand and Vizquel signings last year, but this would be worse than either of them, right up there with Dave Roberts, Ray Durham and Rich Aurilia. Another old, expensive player who struggles to achieve league average performance yet costs us draft picks and millions of dollars.

by mark30perq3 on Nov 24, 2008 7:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Amen

...Alawys surrounded by Angels and Dodger fans... This site keeps me sane

by Giant among Angels on Nov 24, 2008 8:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

a lot of what you said is correct, but let’s not get carried away, Burriss will probably never be as good a hitter as even a broken down version of Renteria. Burriss has no power whatsoever, his .329 SLG last year was 290th in MLB out of 314 players with at least 250 plate appearances, he had a grand total of 8 extra base hits in his 240 ABs. He slugged only .338 in his minor league career. His lack of power will likely prevent him from ever being an everyday player. Even at his worst last year Renteria hit .270/.317/.382, and if you look at his last several years in the NL (where he always plays better than in the AL) he is clearly a much better hitter than Burriss and will be no matter how long he plays.

by FluLikeSymptoms on Nov 24, 2008 9:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Whilst Burriss will likely be better defensively i’d say the chances of him being better offensively are very slim indeed! Even last year, when we were pleased with Burriss’s (and worried that he’ll regress) & Renteria had a bad year, he still outhit Burriss. In fact, in hasn’t hit as bad as Burris did last year in 8 years!

Or if we look at the projection systems, Oliver has Renteria with a wOBA of .331 & Burriss with a wOBA of .291. Bill James had Burriss with an OPS of 664 & Renteria with an OPS of 795. So all the evidence suggests that Renteria will be better offensively than Burriss & probably by a huge amount as well!

Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!

by GiantFan on Nov 24, 2008 11:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I say, lol to you sir.

Burriss would be better than Renteria both offensively and defensively.

/deer head
Bay City Ball

by xanthan on Nov 25, 2008 5:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I lol at your lol

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 9:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

depends how you value OBP

a declining Renteria will still have more power, but if Burriss puts up a .350 OBP again and Renteria puts up a .329 OBP again, then I think despite Burriss’ lack of power he’d be more valuable. Why pay Renteria 9 million when his defense and OBP skills are worse than Burriss’ at this point? Why do we pay millions of dollars for shitty players like Rowand, Roberts, Aurilia, Durham, Zito, etc. and give away picks when there is a player who can do just as well, if not better, for the league minimum. For instance, last year Shierholtz in RF and Winn in CF would have saved us $60 million, a draft pick and it would Nate in my view would have had better numbers than Rowand. Playing Fred Lewis in CF in 2007 would have saved us $18 million and he’d have been better than Roberts. Renteria over Burriss is more of the same.

by mark30perq3 on Nov 25, 2008 6:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Giants have to field a team all 162 games. That’s 1458 inning of play per position. Now the Giants have 4 infield position completely up for grabs so that 5832 innings of play time. Take out 1100 innings for a near league average bat ( say the signed a Renteria or other useful short term vet) that still leaves 4600 innings for the kids. (Frandsen, Burriss, Velez, Travis Ish, & Sandoval) Now figure in the Giants back catchers have played 320- 350 innings the last 2 years and those innings will be Sandoval. Back up 4900+ innings between the 5 kids. Just what is so cramping about each kid averaging close 1000 innings a piece next season? Not a single thing.

The 1k innings would if they don’t beat each out ( Looking at you Frandsen vs. Velez) or get sent down for regular play time to come back up later in the season ( looking at you Burriss but it could also be Pablo if he stumbles long enough).

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 25, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Edit last paragraph.

The 1k innings would if only be if one of the guys to be beat out ( Looking at you Frandsen vs. Velez) or get sent down for regular play time to come back up later in the season ( looking at you Burriss but it could also be Pablo if he stumbles long enough). I think We can all agree if only one of those events occurr it would be truly a banner year for the kids.

Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!

Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!

by daveinexile on Nov 25, 2008 6:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem i have is that you’re assuming that last years performance is their true level & that they’ll both perform at that level in future, which is quite tenuous. Burriss obviously put up a better OBP than renteria last year, but there’s a very good chance that his OBP will be lower in future & there’s a good chance that Renteria’s will be higher.

I think we were all pleased with Burriss’ play last year, but a couple of hundred at bats isn’t enough to be conclusive. I mean, it’s worth noting that apart from last year, he hasn’t put up an OBP greater than 300 at any level above low A. That’s why, projection systems like ZIPS project him for an OBP of 307. Now coupled with his lack of power, that’s attrocious, even for a shortstop.

Renteria obviously had a dissapointing year last year, but has a good chance of rebounding. Previous to last year he put up an OBP of 390 & 361, so it’s not like he’s a traditionally poor OBP player & there’s a good chance he puts up a solid OBP again & coupled with his decent power, means he’s a decent offensive player, especially for a shortstop.

Projection systems aren’t everything & you should take their absolute predictions lightly, but they do show you the evidence behind how players are likely to do in future. And they show the evidence to be pretty good that Renteria will be a much better offensive player in the next couple of years.

Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!

by GiantFan on Nov 26, 2008 12:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My larger point is that we are spending $49 million on Winn, Roberts, Rowand and Zito, all players who will struggle to even maintain a league average performance. And in all of those cases we over paid for players who were declining (as with Benitez, Kline, Durham, Alou, Aurilia) and without attempting to find a homegrown or other creative, more costly alternative. If you are going to spend big money it should be for a great player like A-Rod, Tex, Sabathia etc. From watching Renteria and Burriss and from looking at the numbers and considering Renteria’s age I am convinced that Burriss will be better defensively and close enough to Renteria offensively that it would be insane to give Edgar Renteria 18 million dollars to struggle to be mediocre. That would be a wasted investment. Burriss had a better walk rate, w-k rate and higher contact rate last year than Renteria. He had good OBP numbers in Augusta and in the AZ fall league and awful numbers in SJ and Fresno. Is he a sure thing? Is his defensive even above average? No and no. But he may be better than Renteria over the next 2 years and do it for a fraction of the price, and considering Renteria’s lack of ceiling at this point, thats a chance I’d take. Marco Scutaro, Felipe Lopez (despite his defensive struggles), even David Eckstein would be better, cheaper options than Renteria. I’m just tired of crusty, aging, mediocre veterans who get vastly overpaid and prevent us from landing top tier free agents, spending more in Latin America, or spending more on the draft trying to buy kids out of a college commitment the way Boston has done.

by mark30perq3 on Nov 27, 2008 11:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My larger point is that we are spending $49 million on Winn, Roberts, Rowand and Zito, all players who will struggle to even maintain a league average performance.

One (arguably two) of these things is not like the others.

..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.

by Cookyman on Nov 27, 2008 11:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

because

there is basically almost no chance that Burriss puts up a .350 OBP. And if I have grossly underestimated his ability with the bat then he can prove me wrong in Fresno.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 26, 2008 9:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I had this self same thought

but I kept it to myself because it’s stupid. j/k.

Start with the assumption that there is such a verbal agreement in place between Renteria and the Giants. It now GREATLY benefits the Giants if the Tigers don’t offer arb, but why would leaking the deal help that. If the deal is leaked, and the Tigers believe it, then they will certainly offer arb.

So I can’t see the Giants leaking it, unless it’s some kind of double secret probation leak in which they think that Detroit is more likely to believe the Giants denial of the rumor, rather than the rumor itself? Seems weak.

Would Renteria or his agent leak the offer? Why? It seems it would only p/o the Giants who might pull it. If they weren’t satisfied with the offer they would just not agree.

So, my guess is – either the rumor was totally made up by someone OR the Giants/Renteria’s agent indeed leaked the rumor to either weaken Furcal’s bargaining power

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Nov 24, 2008 10:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

2008: A historic year of firsts
  • The United States elects a black President
  • Zenbitz keeps a stupid thought to himself

My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman

by Goofus on Nov 25, 2008 9:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Zenbits AND howtheyscored!

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Nov 25, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh wait… no, just Zenbits.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Nov 25, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It was totally Renteria's agent, I think

If the Tigers are stupid enough to offer arbitration, it would net his client more money in 2009 and gives him another chance to hit well and get a bigger contract next off-season.

If the Giants decide not to continue pursuit, there are other teams looking, that would be willing to give him a one year $8M contract probably (assuming the Giants are high bid at $9M per and other teams only got up to $8M). It’s not as much as with the Giants, but with $3M already in pocket, that is $11M for the season, plus he gets another year to hit well and get a better contract next off-season.

Thus a very low risk move on their part. If the Giants don’t like it, they can move on to Orlando Cabrera, Renteria probably has a number of options available to him where he don’t have to go with the Giants, his agent won’t shed a tear.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 11:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like Postering ...

the walls of my room with Beatles posters.

Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.

"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
"Woo hoo" - Tim "The Kid" Lincecum

by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Nov 25, 2008 1:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

or maybe macchron is now no better than any other blog

posting rumors as fact

until i see it on the giants’ frontpage….it aint a done deal

by bacci40 on Nov 25, 2008 2:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

macchron?

There amass been plenty of articles written this spring about the stud shortstop Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum , as well as the fluid young outfielders and thirteen basemen Kevin Frandsen.
comics | art | Nattowear | McFAQ I & II

by Natto on Nov 25, 2008 2:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And chicken strips and ketchup!

Yummm.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Nov 25, 2008 4:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Macron!

Ralph Barbieri, heal thyself.

by ThrillisGone22 on Nov 30, 2008 12:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What

What posture does one take when he is posterizing?

by sharksrog on Dec 1, 2008 11:41 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

This posture:

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 1, 2008 6:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about San Francisco Giants.
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Affeldt_small
McCovey Chronicles Christmas Cards
Dnw_small
MCC Recipe Swap & Food Talk Jamboree
Small
What I Would Do With the Roster

Recent FanPosts

Candlestick_small
What This Giants Fan is Thankful For
Ralphie_small
Rank Your Giants Prospects
Img_3997_small
Brett Pill tearing up Venezuela...Bowker apparently scared of the country and going home
Small
Lincecum's Ks - A Very Basic Question on Judgement of Pitching Savvy
Small
Could the Giants get any Compensation Picks?
Shadow_grad_small
We're interested in Uggla...
Lucy-liu_small
Giants add four to 40-man roster
Timmy_avatar_small
Expansion Teams / Relocation Discussion
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Lincecum Arbitration Results Prediction Thread!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Overlord

174246766_ea2fd78204_small Grant

Minions

Fawlty_small WalrusMan

Dog2_small kenshin1

Lincecum_small Natto

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Goofus_small Goofus

Det_7193_small jponry

Minor League Guru

Small steve S