C.C. Sabathia Rumors: You know you're at least a little curious....
According to a source close to a high-level official familiar with the negotiations who also has MLB Trade Rumors bookmarked, the Giants are thinking about offering a six-year contract to C.C. Sabathia. Henry Schulman says the Giants have at least asked about Mark Teixeira, though it’s unlikely the Giants will outbid another team for his services.
Leaving aside the insanity of offering another pitcher 20% of the yearly payroll budget, there’s a fear that if the Giants sign Big Player X, then they won’t be able to sign Matt Cain, Tim Lincecum, or any interesting player in the free agent market. Allow me to put on my serious cap for a bit, and try and find out. All of the salary data is from Cot’s Contracts, except for the almost-educated guesses that I’ve included in the hypothetical future scenarios. This is a long, boring post with a lot of big images and surely some egregious errors, so it will continue in the "Read More" section…
So here’s the state of the Giants’ payroll right now (all figures in millions):
Mmm. Just loving that Zito contract.
There are some assumptions here: a) About 16 players on the Giants will make close to the major-league minimum in 2009, though this doesn’t take into account that the Giants will probably sign another free agent, b) Even though the Giants can set Lincecum’s salary this season, they’ll give him at least $1M, and c) I’m an Excel idiot, so the format of the charts will vary from picture to picture.
Now what if the Giants sign Mark Teixeira or C.C. Sabathia to a crazy six-year deal? I’m going with C.C.’s rumored six-year, $120M deal for both, as I doubt the Giants will get into a bidding war for either player. What would the payroll look like if possible Lincecum and Cain extensions were added on?
Okay. Not…too awful. But not good. That’s a lot of the roster left to fill, and not a lot of money with which to do it. Note that I could be waaaaay off on the Lincecain extension combo – they’re pretty modest – but I thought I’d use Jake Peavy’s contract as a benchmark. Cain’s extension is pure speculation, but Lincecum isn’t a free agent until after 2013, so he’s a little easier to guess. If Lincecum gets an extension, it would likely buy out the arbitration years of 2011-2013.
So the Giants can keep their talent. Well, heck, what happens if three more of the Giants’ youngsters are worth keeping? Picking three of the likeliest candidates, Fred Lewis, Jonathan Sanchez, and Brian Wilson:
And if the Giants wanted to supplement their roster with a free agent every so often, here are some numbers pulled out of my nether regions:
You could rearrange the combination however you’d like. Maybe Sanchez is traded before he gets to arbitration, or Lewis isn’t a player worth paying much more than the major-league minimum. Maybe the Giants defer or backload some of the free agents’ salaries. But the point of this entire post can be condensed into a single sentence, which I will put in crazy bold letters: If the Giants sign a big, expensive free agent, the farm system will need to produce several quality pitchers and hitters to supplement the roster if the team is to contend in the next few years. There isn’t another choice. If the Giants need to fill over half of the roster with cheap, sub-$1M players, they’ll need to get substantial production from pre-arbitration players. That's kind of the idea now, but if there's a firm budget, there won't be a margin for error.
It isn’t impossible to do – take the 2008 Rays for one example – but it’s a huge risk to wholly rely on a historically iffy farm system. And for what? Another big contract to a pitcher? Bah. Harrumph. Maybe Sabathia holds his value like Greg Maddux or Randy Johnson as the years go by, but those guys are freaks of baseball history.
For a positional elite like Teixeira? Less forceful bah. Less forceful harrumph. It would make more sense than Sabathia, for sure, but Teixeira will get a contract even bigger than the modest totals above.
So I finish with the following proposal: Raise the payroll to $160M and make this post pointless. More so, even. Outbid every other team in the universe for Teixeira, even if it means ownership shares for the first baseman. Hell, sign Sabathia too. If that budget increase doesn’t work, stay away from the huge free agents at this point in the Giants’ success cycle.
Thoughts and comments are welcome. Pointing out the egregious errors up there…less so, but I can take it.
0 recs |
152 comments
|
Comments
Salary breakdown
It’s nice to see a salary breakdown here so it becomes clearer how much money we still owe for Benitez and Bonds. That is insane. I wish I was really good at baseball.
Although you’re right that committing so much money to so few players seems like it’ll handicap putting together future rosters, maybe the Giants are interested in a huge bump in payroll considering their new media contracts; and they have faith in the farm system producing those very players who will make the minimum and contribute (Madison, Alderson, Posey, Noonan, Angel, etc etc etc.)
I would still like to see Timmy CC Cain as the top 3…can’t imagine what that would look like for a 3 game series at Pac Bell
by Mrbasepaul on Nov 20, 2008 2:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
My heart says yes
But my mind says no
I see the future, and it is Pablo
by CB30 on Nov 20, 2008 2:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
My body's saying lets go
but my heart is saying no
Kyle Nicholson: the fyootch
by stealth snail on Nov 20, 2008 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So I finish with the following proposal: Raise the payroll to $160M and make this post pointless. More so, even. Outbid every other team in the universe for Teixeira, even if it means ownership shares for the first baseman. Hell, sign Sabathia too. If that budget increase doesn’t work, stay away from the huge free agents at this point in the Giants’ success cycle.
i actually believe they could spend $100M and remain solvent. owners can’t be trusted to tell you the truth about how much money they have to invest in player salaries. maybe that just the socialistahol talking, but, i can’t think of any biz ventures of this size that don’t cook the books.
"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"
by The Gene Hackman on Nov 20, 2008 2:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Murph and Mac were saying this morning that the new Comcst deal might have given the team more room to stretch the payroll than anyone thought.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 20, 2008 2:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve heard this as well from another source (I believe it was an SFGate article, but I could be wrong). I guess we’ll have to wait for the day that we wake up to an announcement from Bill Neukom stating “We’re actually going to have a payroll of about $110 million this season.”
by deuce deuce on Nov 20, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pick-nitting
Doesn’t make much difference, but I thought the team has said they don’t consider Bonds’s’ deferred salary as part of the current budget.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 20, 2008 2:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think the only way that’s true is if they somehow made those $5 million signing bonuses each year rather than $5 million yearly salaries.
by deuce deuce on Nov 20, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought they said they were accounting for the salaries in the years played, but deferred them as a business decision with Bonds that would not affect future payrolls.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 20, 2008 3:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well that sounds good to me. Hopefully you’re correct. But like you said, $5 million doesn’t make much of a difference in the grand scheme of things.
by deuce deuce on Nov 20, 2008 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we don’t sign big free agents (CC) who are too expensive, and we don’t waste our money on middling free agents who could be easily replaced by a lower priced player (Roberts), and we don’t rely on the farm because that’s risky (Posey), what do we do?
I’m starting to think that a number of our prospects panning out is necessary for contention no matter what. If we’re going to add players on to that, I’ll take sure-thing free agents and the low cost/high reward ones.
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 2:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
There’s just a little too much whining here and elsewhere about how building a roster through (expensive FA/cheap FA/Farm System) is too risky, and the clear and sensible course of action is to build a roster through (Farm System/Cheap FA/Expensive FA). Make up your mind, people. I say, if you’re going to spend, spend big!
(Of course, it’s not my money.)
Insert witty signature of your own choosing here.
by Flapjacks McGurty on Nov 20, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
(Of course, it’s not my money.)
That’s of course if you are not a season ticket holder, buying game tickets, purchasing Giants merchandise, or buying $10 beers at the Phone Booth.
Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil
by SoFa King Mike on Nov 20, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
…or even indirectly by watching/listening on mlb.com.
by paboperfecto on Nov 20, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
building a roster through (expensive FA/cheap FA/Farm System) is too risky, and the clear and sensible course of action is to build a roster through (Farm System/Cheap FA/Expensive FA)
Attempting to build a farm system with a goal of plugging every hole: smart. Counting on that working out for you four years in the future while leaving no other alternative: dumb. That’s the distinction I was trying to make.
by Grant on Nov 20, 2008 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just remember past conversations where...
we were all bagging on Sabean for not signing Vlad in favor of signing a bunch of players who individually don’t help much. My understanding of the conclusion coming from that discussion was: go for the sure thing players with the free agent contracts and fill in the blanks with internal development.
Now I understand that Zito really messes stuff up, but there isn’t much we can do there. He’s dead weight whether we sign CC or not. The question is what we do with the remaining money.
What I was getting at is that the Vlad lesson probably remains true despite the presence of Zicasso. It’s better to go for the big time signing than spend our remaining money on 5 or 6 players whose production can be replaced by league minimum (or close to it) players.
I could be wrong. If we could find 5 diamonds in the rough and sign them for $4 million each, that would be great. That just seems easier said than done. And if we do find that type of player, I’m not sure that the presence of CC prevents a $4 million contract. Rather, it might even encourage it because that $4 million contract could be the difference between a good team and a championship-caliber team, and teams area often willing to go above budget to take such a chance.
So, I can see why people might argue that we shouldn’t sign a pitcher because we have great pitching in both the major and minor leagues. I just don’t think that our current situation means that we should not sign a really, really good player to a $20 million per year contract.
Anyway, you rock if you’ve read to far. Often my writing gets more lengthy when the gears are freed up with a post work drink. I’m drinking a martini and listening to Rachmaninoff’s 2nd Symphony and feeling pretty decent. I know that you know about a billion times more about this stuff than I do… so please don’t destroy me.
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
boy...
that last paragraph makes me sound lame.
Uh, really, I’m drinking Pabst and listening to Santogold.
Wait, that might be lame too… uh… Sierra Nevada and Plants & Animals?
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 4:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
HIGH LIFE AND NICKELBACK
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
YES
Castillo got the DFA. Guestimate for Castillo DFA to come before the 2009 season = 2.
by kennv on Nov 20, 2008 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Spotted Cow and Pink Floyd.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Nov 20, 2008 8:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Night Train and Lynnrd Skynnrd
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
by zenbitz on Nov 21, 2008 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree…to a point. There isn’t a Vlad in this free agent class, and an overweight workhorse of a pitcher — when the Giants already have some pitching — doesn’t bury my acorns. That’s why I’m less adamant about Teixeira, though he worries me because a good GM should be able to find first basemen without spending $140M.
If this were about A-Rod (the first time), Carlos Beltran (though that hasn’t been the best return on investment), or another 20-something superstar, I’d be in.
by Grant on Nov 20, 2008 5:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't 30...
Just 20 something too?
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Nov 20, 2008 8:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I want to agree that Tex makes a little sense, and that CC makes virtually. Then I remembered: CC can hit! Two birds with one stone! Um, I’m not even sure I’m kidding…
by BigO on Nov 20, 2008 2:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
yes!
if CC plays first against righties, and phelps against lefties, and cc, lincecum and cain each toss an inning of relief on their bullpen session days, they could save millions on a set-up man and a first baseman.
Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.
by jasomack on Nov 20, 2008 9:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Regarding revenue, $100 million budgets seem kind of low. I quote from Andrew Baggarly:
Remember, for all their talk of building through player development, the Giants are not the A’s or Rays. San Francisco is a top-10 revenue franchise, easily. The Giants haven’t spent a dime of their windfall from signing a new cable deal with Comcast. And if the Seawall Lot 337 development deal goes down in the next year or two, they’ll be one of baseball’s fattest cash cows
If what he says is true, then I wouldn’t worry too much about the budget. It might be going up to $110-120 million pretty soon. And I say that as someone who has no idea what the hell the “Seawall Lot 337 development deal” is.
Insert witty signature of your own choosing here.
by Flapjacks McGurty on Nov 20, 2008 2:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Seawall lot 337 development deal info
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/14/BAQAV1NNV.DTL
by superk1ng on Nov 20, 2008 2:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Google is an awesome thing
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/14/BAQAV1NNV.DTL
by CTGiant on Nov 20, 2008 2:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn It!!!!
I clicked post as I saw yours coming up
by CTGiant on Nov 20, 2008 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks to both of you . . .
. . . but your links don’t work. I’ll just go google “Seawall lot 337”.
Insert witty signature of your own choosing here.
by Flapjacks McGurty on Nov 20, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Flappy!
Good news! I’ve decided not to kill you!
I left my swagger in my other pants.
by HughG16 on Nov 20, 2008 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nice

Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
by nostocksjustbonds on Nov 20, 2008 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Looks ’Shopped.
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Nov 20, 2008 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Where the hell are we supposed to park?
Insert witty signature of your own choosing here.
by Flapjacks McGurty on Nov 20, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You obviously have to park in the Cove on that blue asphalt
Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACE™ / Adopted brother of the AnVil
by SoFa King Mike on Nov 20, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
neutered...
Where the hell are we supposed to park tailgate?
They say some players get out of bed hitting; Pablo Sandoval doesn't wait that long
by bgunn on Nov 20, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bart
My adopted son Matt Downs. Lost in the wilderness of mediocrity.
by nvsfg on Nov 20, 2008 3:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ride your bike
the SFBC offers free bike valet services
"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"
by The Gene Hackman on Nov 20, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you hippie!
Charlie Hayes ate my homework
by glenallen hill's waterpipe on Nov 20, 2008 9:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i prefer beatnik…
"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"
by The Gene Hackman on Nov 21, 2008 9:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The problem with riding your bike
Is that you can still get a DUI. And, what with all the balancing and minute course corrections, it’s alot more obvious that you’re wasted.
Also, you’d have to wear those fruity spandex Daisy Dukes to a baseball game.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 20, 2008 10:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and some odd spandex jesery with a bank logo you’ve never heard of.
by tyrannoman on Nov 21, 2008 9:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nah.
"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"
by The Gene Hackman on Nov 21, 2008 9:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is the baseball field still there?
by Lars The Wanderer on Nov 20, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is why all of these conversations are irrelevant. No one outside the Giants organization knows how much revenue they have or how much is going to what. As much as we the fans obsess over Zito’s poor contract and “geez, how will we ever compete with two huge contracts on the payroll”, management doesn’t even blink.
They’ve been running this team for the past 15 years and always turn a profit and until the last 3 years have put winners on the field. Give them some credit. They’ve never reduced payroll because they were “financially insolvent”.
Don’t get me wrong, I do understand how much fun it is to obsess.
by I own a Kayak and I'm not sure why now on Nov 20, 2008 6:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it does seem low… in 2005, at they end of their “going for it” years, the payroll hit 90mil. normal inflation and mlb revenue increases would put it over 100 million for ’09, and the comcast deal and other streams should push it higher after that. how much higher?
Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.
by jasomack on Nov 20, 2008 9:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Benitez..
..is still on the payroll? I wanna puke.
by faust10 on Nov 20, 2008 2:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
my thoughts exactly
Still defending Rich Aurilia, and the Niners' classic unis
by wjackalope on Nov 20, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Question
Assuming the Giants player payroll is on a steady, uninterrupted upward progression and the FO budgets accordingly when they come up with their 5-year plans…the payroll was only $76M last season after being right around $90M the previous few years. What did the team do with the extra $14M? Pocket it? Put it aside for free agent signings? Anyone know?
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Nov 20, 2008 3:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
retirement gift for Magowan?
Still defending Rich Aurilia, and the Niners' classic unis
by wjackalope on Nov 20, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hopefully they didn’t put it in the S&P 500
"ever so cynical yet whimsical giants related signature"
by The Gene Hackman on Nov 20, 2008 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Buster Posey did his best to chip away at that $14mil, and Conor Gillispe got his bit as well.
by tyrannoman on Nov 20, 2008 6:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Barry also I believe got a total of $10.8 m last year. He got $5 deferred from his 02-06 contract, and another 5.8 from his 07 contract was deferred to 08. I believe Mike Matheny got some cash as well last year.
Don't think, it could only hurt the ballclub.
by ResDog on Nov 20, 2008 7:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've been slowly climbing aboard the Teixeira bandwagon for awhile.
And I’m at the point now where I want Tex in a Giants uni. Screw the payroll.
At the beginning of last season I was sure the Giants were 2 – 3 years away from fielding a competitive team, and I wanted them to reach that competitiveness through the farm system. But with the emergence of Timmy this year, I’m thinking these are years that should not be wasted through a slow rebuild. What if Timmy duplicates last year, Matt continues to progress and wins something close to 20 games, Sanchez continues to progress and his stamina allows him a full season, and the Giants have the same offense next year that they had this year? Those things might not happen of course, but I would rather be prepared if they do than assume they won’t. Add Beltre and Tex and the Giants just might win a bunch of games with offense and pitching.
Greetings, Marklar! I am Marklar! This is Marklar.
by marklar on Nov 20, 2008 3:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure,
but I think it could be relatively cheap. MLBTradeRumors mentioned that Sanchez would be too much. So I guess work down from there. (I am not as knowledgeable about the farm as a lot of the contributors here.) I think the M’s are motivated to move him as he cannot hit at Safeco, and it would be a salary dump.
Greetings, Marklar! I am Marklar! This is Marklar.
by marklar on Nov 20, 2008 3:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
misch maybe?
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Nov 20, 2008 4:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m afraid this is a severe underestimation of what it would take. He’s may well be an “A”-type free agent at the end of next year, so you know that, at worst, the M’s can claim that they will offer him arb, and take 2 top picks. So you have to figure that we’d need to offer at least someobe like Sosa plus another guy with reasonable upside.
by BigO on Nov 20, 2008 4:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely not Sosa
Pass, next please.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Nov 20, 2008 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. I think the offense will be a little better without Texiera because:
Pablo > Castillo
Burriss > Omar
Lewis > last year
Rowand > last year
Ishikawa/Phelps > Bowker/Aurilia
But the improvement Texiera would give would make a big difference to the entire complexion of the offense. He’s worth the gamble.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 20, 2008 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You had me until that last comparison. I am not so sure that is a slam dunk.
by Lars The Wanderer on Nov 20, 2008 4:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bowker was pretty bad last year.
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But the DINGERZZZZ!1
I can haz homerunz!
by jbowl on Nov 20, 2008 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about Lewis
But that was hashed over ad nauseum during the season.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Nov 20, 2008 6:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
unlike others, i agree. The only question is will Lewis and Rowand be healthy. If they are, then you are correct.
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Nov 20, 2008 8:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We hope Lewis is better.
Hopefully his bunion heals up nice and goitery.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Nov 20, 2008 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Yes
$20 that he won’t
Probably, but not by much
Yes
But also:
Frandsen/Velez < Durham
Molina < last year
Winn < last year
So I’m not expecting any big improvements.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Nov 21, 2008 3:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just dont’ think Tex wants to play here. Don’t know why I get that feeling, but I do. Unless the Giants’ widley overpay, he just won’t show up.
I think offering CC a lot of $$, but not as much as the Yanks or Dodgers, or whomever makes a lot of sense. At worst, he accepts your offer, and you get a world class pitcher at a below market rate. At worse, you get some serious tire kicking time in.
by tyrannoman on Nov 20, 2008 6:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
just listened to baggs on the radio
and he says Brian Sabean agrees with you about Texeira
by oldjacket on Nov 20, 2008 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
More disgusting...
that next year we’re paying Roberts $6.5 or Benitez $1.6?
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Nov 20, 2008 3:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
tough call
I’d say Benitez is worse, because he’s not still on the team – of course, Roberts might be more valuable being not on the team also, but theoretically, he could contribute.
Still defending Rich Aurilia, and the Niners' classic unis
by wjackalope on Nov 20, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d say Benitez is worse, because he’s not still on the team
In other words, you wish Benitez was still on the team.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 20, 2008 3:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
oh good god
don’t put words into my mouth, at least, not those words. There’s a lot of things I wish, Benitez still being on the team – not one of them…
Still defending Rich Aurilia, and the Niners' classic unis
by wjackalope on Nov 20, 2008 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When I see that...
…the Giants have committed $17.6M next year to Bonds, Roberts, Lowry & Benitez, I’m thinking (a) there’s your Teixeira right there and (2) why does Sabean still have his job?
Why isn't Sabean held accountable for leading the Giants into many years of mediocrity???
by oldrips on Nov 20, 2008 4:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
At the very least, San Francisco is buy-curious.
by Natto on Nov 20, 2008 3:18 PM PST reply actions 1 recs

No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Nov 20, 2008 4:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I just blue myself!
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
there’s gotta be a better way to say that
Molina's gonna test his arm...
by Victorious Secret on Nov 21, 2008 2:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Neokom Bomb
Believe Neuk wants a big splash in The Cove to begin his tenure. Though Tex meets ALL the Giants line-up wishes it sounds as though he will get a huge long-term contract. If CC really wants a NL West Coast team then SF should at least make a competitive offer to one of the best pitchers in the game who is in his prime.
By the way, isn’t Lincecum a Super Two guy? If so, does that make him eligible to arbitration and more monies?
by wilriv21 on Nov 20, 2008 3:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
can we go back in time
and not sign Zito? McFly?
Still defending Rich Aurilia, and the Niners' classic unis
by wjackalope on Nov 20, 2008 3:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I hate manure...
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Nov 20, 2008 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Problem
You need to factor in 2013 dollars and contract value. The 6-year, $120 million dollar contract of 2008 will most likely be, by 2013 (thanks to the Yankees, Red Sox and other large market teams), 6-years, $140 million to $160 million.
by esfads on Nov 20, 2008 3:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It doesn’t make sense to hold payroll constant for 5 years at 100M. It will probably go up 5-10/year just on inflation and increased revenues.
Your numbers do point out the “win now” aspect of Lincecum and Cain. Most of the advantage of having these guys is that they are paid pre-arb and pre-FA salaries. If we “rebuild” for another 2 years, then we have gained nothing (Other than 3 CYAs)
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
by zenbitz on Nov 20, 2008 3:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
that should be 5-10%
But hey, round numbers save the day!
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
by zenbitz on Nov 20, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
heh. 5-10% of $100m is still 5-10 (million) ;-)
by FPTV on Nov 20, 2008 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How on Earth are we still paying Blownitez? Is that a deferred payment to FLA for taking on his contract?
Anagram of "Giants pitcher Tim Lincecum" = TENSE, CLIMACTIC, TRIUMPHING
by Stuttering John Tamargo on Nov 20, 2008 3:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I believe the deferred payment was part of the original contract.
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I love going through pages of discussion threads and just looking at the pictures
am I teh weird?
Yes!
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 4:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I forget where...
but I read that the Giants are making it clear to CC that we are still serious in our pursuit of Furcal and being competitive now. So if we get a ‘deal’ on Sabathia (let’s say 6/130) and sign Furcal (4/48) we would be looking at 77.1 + roughly 33.5 = 110.6. Not a ridiculous number this day in age but still much higher than the team is saying they would like to spend.
My question is this (note: rosterbation to follow)
1. Furcal SS
2. Winn RF
3. Sandoval 3B
4. Molina C
5. Rowand CF
6. Lewis LF
7. Ishikawa 1B
8. Frandsen 2B
Phelps 1B
Burriss IF
Roberts OF
Schierholtz OF CL Wilson
Velez IF/OF
1.Sabathia
2. Lincecum
3. Zito
4. Cain
5. Sanchez
LR Lowry
RP Tashner
RP Hinshaw
RP Romo
RP Sadler
RP Affeldt
CL Wilson
Is this team any better than last years model?
by lincysgiants on Nov 20, 2008 5:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
quite a bit better
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But likely not 10 wins better
When you factor in the luck last year in 1 run games.
And 10 wins better is what you need to start thinking about being competitive.
Barely competitive.
by FairweatherFan on Nov 20, 2008 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i understand the 3 headed monster theory (timmy/cc/cain) but doesnt a 1B .300/30/100 hitter help us more
by cazzuno on Nov 20, 2008 5:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, it's been a few days.....
CAIN FOR FIELDER!!!
Don't think, it could only hurt the ballclub.
by ResDog on Nov 20, 2008 7:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE
MAY I PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO YOUR BLOG?
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Nov 20, 2008 8:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s over 10 wins better. Having Affeldt and Romo for a full season wil make the ’pen a lot better, as would the innings that CC would eat up. If Wilson grows up a little, and quits nibbling early in the count I think he will improve as well. Of course, I have a case of bad Hotstoveitis with a side of optimisim and am irrational right now.
by tyrannoman on Nov 20, 2008 6:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well adding Sabathia & Furcal would probably be worth approaching 10 wins above the production we got from the positions last year (SS & 5th starter) I guess it depends on whether you think they’ll be more regression or improvement in the other areas. I’d guess a conservative estimate would be that we’d be around equal apart from that, due to improvements in some areas & a regression due to luck.
Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!
by GiantFan on Nov 21, 2008 3:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm...
nothing like a back of the envelope calc.
Furcal was 5 wins above “Giants SS” last year and he didn’t even play a half season. SS+5
1B was ~4 wins below avg, I think we can pick up at least 2. 1B+2
2B was -1 win – be generous and call it even
3B was -3 win I’ll call Pablo average and +3.
So that’s +10 wins + CC + relief. Probably 15 win better than last year.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
by zenbitz on Nov 21, 2008 9:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what was the back of the envelope contribution of Pat Hennesoria?
by oldjacket on Nov 21, 2008 10:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They wrote the return address…but spelled it wrong.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 21, 2008 2:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In a word - NO.
It also condemns the Giants to finding a decent option at 3rd, 2nd & first solely from in house candidates. As well as bench players. Sabean’s track record for first baseman pukes speaks for itself. Named the last 5 MLB regular position players the Giants farm kicked out and note how long back you have to go. Now we want to lay a bet that the team produces 5 MLB position players inside of 4 years? Assumes Rowand and Furcall will be healthy enough to not need replacements for SS &/or CF in 2-3 years because if they do they will have to be found from in house candidates. I’ll say nothing of pay raises for young players the prove they as MLB in 2-3years.
I just forces us fans into more seasons like ‘05, ‘06,’07 were you only get in the post season by luck and you are basically waiting for the front office to let its mistakes roll off the books ( “tear it down years” if you will) so we can start going through the “rebuilding years” all over again. It’s too soon for me to want to do that all over again. No thanks.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!
by daveinexile on Nov 21, 2008 9:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So Grant, Reading this has made me realize that the situation is a Catch-22.
If the Giants sign a big, expensive free agent, the farm system will need to produce several quality pitchers and hitters to supplement the roster if the team is to contend in the next few years.
That’s true, and that is part of my fear w/ making a big signing with Zito on the books.
But guess what – If you don’t sign FA’s, you also have made yourself dependent on the farm system to produce several quality pitchers and hitters. (where else are you going to get them?)
You’ve gotta get good players from somewhere. If you sign the FA, you get a good player and you need your farm to produce good supplemental players to go anywhere.
If you don’t sign the FA, then you need the farm to produce some good players and you can then sign some FA supplemental players if you want to go anywhere.
Or you can just be the Rays and have the farm produce it all, but that is probably not a viable strategy.
So what is a better strategy? Signing FA talent and filling in the gaps from the farm or producing talent from the farm and filling in the gaps through FA?
Either way, you need the farm to produce in order for the team to be any good. It all comes down to that.
Or you could take the middle road, and sign a bunch of Durhams, Tuckers, Rowands, and Roberts type players. We all know how well that works.
by FairweatherFan on Nov 20, 2008 5:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know what the fuck just happened there.
by FairweatherFan on Nov 20, 2008 5:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you accidentally hit the button to close blockquotes and then kept typing, that might have done it.
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody really knows...
With a lot of things on this place.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Nov 20, 2008 8:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
Like who invited howtheyscored
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 10:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There were invitations? I mean, the door was… well, it wasn’t open at first, but I got it open eventually. And then I just walked in. I mean, if you guys didn’t want me in here, why have a door?
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Nov 20, 2008 10:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that does explain the crowbar marks around the deadbolt. But why break all the front windows, too?
by tyrannoman on Nov 21, 2008 9:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually..
He did that after he got in. you can only imagine what grant did then.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on Nov 21, 2008 9:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody really knows…
With a lot of things on this place.
I strongly resemble this remark.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!
by daveinexile on Nov 21, 2008 9:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it could be 10 wins better...
Furcal >>>>>>>>Vizquel if healthy
Sabathia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Henny/Correia
Sandoval >>>>>>>> Castillo
Affeldt >>>>>>> other 2008 options
I think that’s significantly better team.
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 5:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
crap... this was supposed to be a reply to FairweatherFan
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on Nov 20, 2008 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We have to replace Durham somehow.
by rotorueter on Nov 20, 2008 5:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
let’s just skip that rosterbation and assume Frandsen/Burriss << Durhammy
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Nov 20, 2008 8:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the best bet for that is Sandoval “O” being much better the Joe Castles. Lets not forget except for hot streaks Durham was no prize with a glove. He was no Dr. Strangleglove and he always worked hard but that part of his game could end up being improved.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!
by daveinexile on Nov 21, 2008 9:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
on the bright side
zito in 2014 is a steal….haha
by cazzuno on Nov 20, 2008 5:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No, that’s the price we’d pay to not have him on the roster.
My current Interwebs obsession is pretty awesome. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Nov 20, 2008 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So if I understand this right...
…all we need to do is find 14 players willing to pay $800,000 each for the privilege of playing for the 2012 Giants, and all our problems are solved!
Scott McClain: Great story, no place on the 2009 Giants.
by EliminateMe on Nov 20, 2008 5:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
you see, that’s where the “Giants Way” comes in. You’re a true giant if you want 2 players to make 2000% more than you and two other players to make 1200% more than you, and all of them are pitchers.
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Nov 20, 2008 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Killer rotation.
And when Pablo and Randy aren’t due up I’ll be working on my Hadron Supercollider Home Theater Flowbee with Scrubbing Bubbles. Or somethin’.
Who has the fun?
Is it always the man with the gun?
- The Stranglers
by victor frankenstein on Nov 20, 2008 6:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting analysis. The bottom line, for me, is this: The team doesn’t have much of a chance without some success through the farm system.
I go back and forth. I’m in favor of getting good players if their performance is expected to match their salary. I think Sabathia might just do that.
But as you point out, unless the team has a lot more money than we know, we’re going to have to have major success with homegrown players to make it work. So it might make sense to see what we get from the farm before spending on CC.
I’m undecided, so I guess I’d rather be too cautious than too aggressive in the free-agent market.
Thanks for the spreadsheets.
by Dan from NM on Nov 20, 2008 8:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
To me it comes down to how many holes not filled. ( insert your favorate that’s what she said remark here). Going into this season the team has 5 holes with ( 1st, 2nd, SS, 3rd and utility inf) with 4-6 viable options (depending on your views of Velez and Phelps) to compete for them. Add to it 2 middle of the order type bats so now we are up to 7 holes. If the Giants were down to 3 or 4 holes then I start getting Bullish.
But to get there the Giants needs to have like 3 of the young guys get played enough so they can prove they are more then interesting. Lets not forget its is possible next off season we are looking a slightly tested JuggerNate for RF ( not entirely a bad thing) and/or if Rowand’s last half continues a new CF. So it is entirely possible the Giants only hold even if 2 or infielder crew prove sound.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!
by daveinexile on Nov 21, 2008 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Go big or go home...
Why don’t we just sign CC, Teixeira, Ramirez and Furcal and bump our payroll up to Yankees/Red Sox range…
Furcal
Lewis
Sandoval
Teixeira
Ramirez
Molina
Rowand
Frandsen
With our pitching I’d say that’s a minimum of 3 consecutive world series titles.
I think I pulled my swagger muscle...
by BawLa on Nov 20, 2008 8:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
then they default on the mortgage and the Giants “return” to the park across the street from Seals Stadium!
and the f’n Blue Jays buy Mays Field for pennies on the loon?
Charlie Hayes ate my homework
by glenallen hill's waterpipe on Nov 20, 2008 9:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hey, that park
is where our soccer team plays. hands off!
though, on the plus side, it would be near the doubleplay bar
BB should send scouts to watch cricket players.
by alea iacta est on Nov 21, 2008 12:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would you realy bat Sandoval at 3 and not Ramirez?
I can haz homerunz!
by jbowl on Nov 20, 2008 10:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
for christmas i want
david wright, cc sabathia, mark teixera, ichiro, and and ryan braun…can someone put a price tag on that for me?
by newbtoob on Nov 21, 2008 1:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
have you been a good little boy?
I think I pulled my swagger muscle...
by BawLa on Nov 21, 2008 2:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Those are pretty interesting charts. Let’s try to guess how good that team would be, circa 2012.
Say Sabathia, Lincecum, and Cain are collectively 12 wins above replacement by then. (They were at 16-17 in 2008.)
Say Lewis, Wilson, and Sanchez have developed to be very slightly above average, for a collective 7 war.
Strike the third random free agent in order to balance the budget. (Of course the payroll should be well over $100 million by then, but your free agent salaries look pretty low, so let’s assume that balances out.) The two free agents who are left aren’t getting paid much, so let’s assume they don’t contribute much: a collective 3 war.
Add 1 for a declining Rowand and zero for an already-declined Zito. That gets us to 23 wins above replacement, or around 71 wins altogether.
So we need another 19 more to be a good team, and we have 15 players with which to get there — or, since the guys at the end of the bench won’t make much difference either way, call it 10 players. That’s 1.9 each. So every one of those 10 players must be basically average.
How hard is that? Well, Sandoval is probably at that level right now (if he’s a catcher). Schierholtz too, or close to it. Sergio Romo would be about 1 war if he pitched all season as he did in 2008. Frandsen at second would need to hit around .275/.330/.410, with average defense, to reach that level. Burriss at short would need to hit .270/.330/.380, with average defense. Etc. So it’s hard, but not impossible.
Now run the numbers without Sabathia. You have an extra $20 million to spend in 2012 — but you need an extra four wins to get to 90. So you’re still going to need either (a) an expensive investment in free agents, or (b) remarkable success in developing players from within the organization.
The difference between the two schemes, it seems to me, is you’re taking on significant risk for the long-term, in that Sabathia might well have broken down by 2012; but in the short term you’re substantially increasing your chances of winning, with all the revenue-boosting and general joy-to-the-world-bringing that comes with it.
by Evan on Nov 21, 2008 9:59 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tex and Angel
One thing that hasn’t been mentioned is the signing of Tex and how that would affect Angel in the future. I know he isn’t ready yet to make an impact in single A +, but if we are considering the Giants’ success in the next 3-4 years is inextricably tied to their success in developing players in the farm system, what happens when Tex is in his 3rd or 4th year of the contract paying him 20 mil a year and Angel is knocking on the mlb door with 30 hr seasons at Double-A? Do we try and trade Tex? Angel? Am I dreaming up a Jim Thome/Ryan Howard scenario?
I like the CC signing better because he would instantly become our best hitter, would take a hometown discount (it sounds like at least), would give us a (rather) monster rotation, allow us to possibly trade one of our pitching prospects for a hitting prospect, is extremely athletic despite his size (6’7, 300) and I really want the Giants to have a big fat lefthander on the mound, a fat dude behind the plate, a fat dude playing third base, and Tim Lincecum sitting on the bench going damn, I can’t even bench press half of CC. That’s a world I want to live in.
by Mrbasepaul on Nov 21, 2008 10:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think AnVil is anywhere close to the point where you have to start leaving a positionj open for him. He’s a long way from being ready and might slot into other positions like 3B or LF.
If they were to sign Tex and AnVil tears it up in double A like you said, I’d just consider that a great “problem” to have.
My adopted Giant: "Raptor Jesus" Guzman
by Goofus on Nov 21, 2008 2:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Giants accounting department can figure out all that stuff. I would sure love to see a pitching staff of cc, lincecum and cain. You can wait on the young hitters or sign a free agent hitter.
by northsfbay on Nov 21, 2008 10:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
About having Tex and Anvil. I don’t ever remember a team having too many good players. I remember teams not having enough good players.
by northsfbay on Nov 21, 2008 10:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great post...
The thought of of sabathia, lincecum, cain, alderson, and burmarger just makes me a little happier. If we sign CC (and for some reason i have a feeling we will.. if he wanted the yanks offer he would have accepted) i think we should immediatley trade sanchez. Also the thought of also signing Furcal, which i am in favor of could create a great team for many many years to come.
Assuming we could (big assumption) sign bot CC and Furcal plus trade sanchez for Beltre + AA prospect, just lloking ahead…
SS- Furcal
LF- Winn
1B- Sandavol
3B- Beltre
C- Molina
CF- Rowand
RF- Lewis
2B- Frandsen/Burris
Sabathia
Lincecum
Cain
Ace (zito.. obviously)
fill in ( Martinez, English, Pucetas) or low risk IE Hampton, Prior, Pedro
Rotation would only be this way for one season, with Mad-Bum and Tiimy-A on the way.
Total guess but could happen, I BELIEVE.
by giantsrockdudes on Nov 22, 2008 1:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Don’t count your chickens before they hatched. The Giants haven’t signed anyone yet. If the Giants trade their young pitching, you are filling one hole by creating another hole. You never have enough pitching. If you trade your young pitching you could be sorry. What if the Giants traded Lincecum. All teams are always looking for hitting and pitching. There isn’t much pitching to go around. If you traded cain or sanchez, you would have to replace them with pitchers that give up 6 runs in 3 innings. There is no guarantee that the prosects will make it to the majors.
by northsfbay on Nov 23, 2008 1:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Awww, man. How come he gets a rock?
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Nov 23, 2008 8:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey I'm Caption Obvious!
Or is that Oblivious? I get those 2 words so confused.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Here comes Captain Obvious wearing his Atomic Wedgie!
by daveinexile on Nov 24, 2008 8:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but the thing is
We have one of the best farm systems in all of baseball for producing pitchers; we could easily spit out a 4th/5th starter at least. We have MadBum, Tim 2, Sosa, Pucetas, Nicholson, Tanner, Barnes, etc. And we’re also poised for another good draft. And another point; every team that wins a WS has to create a good amount of its team through the farm system. The only team that can get by without that is the Yankees. Our system is also getting a lot better at producing hitters. We have Posey, AnVil, RafRod, Noonan, Kieschnick, Crawford, and mooore. Isn’t it fair to expect at least one good hitter to emerge out of all of them?
by boonitez on Nov 23, 2008 1:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I would like to see what sanchez does next year before you trade him. He is a hard thrower and he had 150 strikeouts. He had a good first half. If he is the real deal you have 3 good starting pitchers. You could go after burrell or dunn. If you are strong you can hit it out of any park, like bonds. I can’t wait for the season to start and see how the young players do. GO GIANTS!
by northsfbay on Nov 24, 2008 6:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 























