How the Other Half Lives: Jake Peavy Trade Rumors
The Giants would like to make a trade for a good hitter. But then they'd have to trade something good to get back something good. Hey, you know who's good? Matt Cain! I wonder what we can trade Matt Cain for. Maybe they could replenish the farm system. Maybe they could trade Matt Cain for three prospects. And then, when those prospects turn into good major leaguers like Cain, the Giants could trade those three prospects for a total of nine prospects. Assuming a three-year lag between prospectdom and major league success, here's how the plan would work.
2009: three prospects
2012: nine prospects
2015: 27 prospects
2018: 81 prospects
2021: 243 prospects
2024: 729 prospects
If the Giants trade Matt Cain for three prospects right now and continue to trade each prospect as they become major leaguers, then they will control every player in Major League Baseball by 2024. If the Giants did this 15 years ago, they'd have Evan Longoria as a backup for David Wright. This isn't just idle speculation. I've shown my math above. This plan can't miss. Put the slide rule back in the pocket protector, Gilbert, and bow to my math skills.
Until now, exactly what Cain would bring back in trade has been a mystery. Some reports have Prince Fielder and J.J. Hardy coming back, which seems insane. Other goofs have tossed out names like Hideki Matsui, which is equally insane, but for a different reason. And the equation for any premium player's trade value according to a fan of the opposite team is something like this:
So no one knows what Cain's trade value is. He's a good pitcher with the potential to be great, and he's under control for three more years for a total of $13.5M, which is a steal compared to what he'd command on the open market.
The whole point of this protracted introduction was to compare Cain to Jake Peavy. Now I'm realizing that it's an awful comparison. Peavy is the better pitcher. But Cain hasn't had any arm problems, while Peavy has had some elbow issues. Cain will cost $13.5M over the next three years; Peavy will cost $60M over the next five, or $78M over the next six if his option is picked up. Stupid comparison. Apples to rhinosceroses. And now I have all of these pretty words on the subject that I don't want to just delete.
The entire point of this post was to ask if anyone else is as underwhelmed with the rumored offers for Jake Peavy as I am. The rumored offer from the Braves is something like Jordan Schafer, Yunel Escobar, and either Jo-Jo Reyes or Charlie Morton. The Braves are reportedly not going to give up Jason Heyward or Tommy Hanson. The rumored offer from the Cubs is something like Jeff Samarzdfazzaza, Ronny Cedeno, and Calvin Murray Felix Pie. There's a lot of talent there. Schafer's a danged good prospect --mystery HGH-related suspension aside -- and Pie's has been highly regarded for a while, but, yeeesh.
The Padres would be giving up one of the ten best pitchers in baseball, who is locked up for five or six years for about $40M below market value. He's a homegrown player, and he's extremely popular. If you're making that trade, Schafer or Pie would have to become stars. They can't just turn into nice, glad-to-have-ya players. Not when you're giving up a fan favorite who left a lot of money on the table for your franchise. In order to satisfy the fanbase, at least one of the acquired prospects would have to come up and be instant superstars like Tim Lincecum or David Wright were. They can't just keep teasing the Padres with their potential -- like B.J. Upton or Chris "Diamondbacks Player" Young are doing to their franchises -- as they inch towards arbitration.
It would be a huge gamble to trade Peavy for a handful of prospects who aren't once-in-every-five-draft-class type prospects, and I'm glad the Giants aren't dealing with similar offers for Matt Cain. I don't get what the Padres are doing.
Comments
Somebody get Haley Joel Osment! This man has an idea!
by cheno on
Nov 12, 2008 12:31 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I believe the Padres hands are tied by the fact that they need/want to shed payroll. Because other teams know this, the offers coming back for Peavy are going to be less than ideal.
To summarize: it isn’t that the market for upper tier pitchers is bad. The Padres depressed the market for Peavy themselves.
by Lars The Wanderer on
Nov 12, 2008 12:34 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
So why aren’t we serving up a nice poo poo platter for Peavy?
Oh yeah, we like to overpay for our players and Peavy’s contract is too good of a deal.
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
by WilliamVanLandingham on
Nov 12, 2008 1:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and there is no way padres trade with Giants or vice-versa…
remember niners trading with seahawks for D. Jackson (that worked out well for us)
by cazzuno on
Nov 12, 2008 1:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey – but we traded the mighty Mark Sweeney to the the Dodgers.
Yeah, I know, Padres want Peavy out of the division. The point of the post was to point out that our GM likes to overspend on players.
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
by WilliamVanLandingham on
Nov 12, 2008 2:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Depending on the offer, I’d bet they would be willing to deal him within the division. The Dodgers were considered a possible match and still might be.
A NL West team would probably have to offer more than a team outside the division, but I think it is still a possibility.
by Lars The Wanderer on
Nov 12, 2008 3:01 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Peavy also has a no trade clause, and the Giants’ don’t appear to be on his list of approved teams (from what I’ve seen)
by tyrannoman on
Nov 13, 2008 9:39 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just wanted to say..
I really love Yunel Escobar, he’s an above average hitter for his position — an sOPS+ of 116 for ’08 — and was a +21 defender by plus/minus. He was essentially just as good as Jimmy Rollins last year.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 12, 2008 12:34 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Was hoping the SD/Atlanta deal would not work out and the Braves would come knocking on SF’s door asking about Cain. Possibly GM Wren could offer something really sweet to SF.
by wilriv21 on
Nov 12, 2008 12:37 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe, Escobar would be a good start for an offer to Cain.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 12, 2008 12:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would love
to get something centered around him for cain. Maybe him Ronny Delgado and Eric Campbell? Is that too much for the Braves?
Mischievously implosive purple pitching staff.
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on
Nov 12, 2008 11:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Other goofs have tossed out names like Hideki Matsui, which is equally insane, but for a different reason.
I know! The Wind Up Bird Chronicle is great, but this baseball.
Psycho killer, qu'est-ce que c'est?
by shikantaza on
Nov 12, 2008 12:40 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Confused
I thought "how the other half lives" had more to do with eating caviar from the belly button of a supermodel than who you might get for Jake Peavy.
Yes we did!
by Goofus on
Nov 12, 2008 12:57 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
wait, isn't that WAS our half?
i thought the other half lived in squalor and ate potato bugs for dinner.
now if you’ll excuse me, natasha has my sterlet ready to go.
Dodgers fans eat their young.
by redhornet78 on
Nov 12, 2008 1:00 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
title should read: wait, i thought that was our half?
(because grammar is fundamental)
Dodgers fans eat their young.
by redhornet78 on
Nov 12, 2008 1:18 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So Matt Cain's trade value is something equivalent to
Tim Alderson, Travis Ishikawa, Eugenio Velez, and Noah Lowry?
Ouch.
Hector Sanchez: really getting tired of playing baseball in foreign countries...
by tedfordfan on
Nov 12, 2008 1:26 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Crossed out Calvin Murray is hilarious! It seems I have drafted Pie for several years in my keeper fantasy leagues and he is a perennial disappointment.
by out machine on
Nov 12, 2008 1:36 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Calvin Murray...
Greatest catch I’ve ever seen, just for the dive he made coming in and towards left. Made a belly dive and slid about 15 feet on the slick grass.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on
Nov 12, 2008 8:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I saw Calvin make the best catch I’ve seen in person as well. He was covering the RF gap, and the ball was hit hard to the LF gap. Calvin ran it down, and finished with a stunning dive. The impressive part, though, was the fact that he had to run about two miles just to get within divin’ range.
by tyrannoman on
Nov 13, 2008 9:42 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I too have been overwhelmed
Escobar and Schaffer are great, but they’d really need a Heyward/Hanson type prospect to really make it worthwhile. The problem for the Pads is that EVERYONE knows they HAVE to sell Peavy, it’s not a “we’re willing to listen” stance like the Giants have with Cain.
The Padres are cutting the payroll from 75 million to 35-40 million due to John Moore’s divorce. Peavy NEEDS to be moved and the only chance the Pads have at leverage is having the Braves and Cubs compete against one another.
by NeifiChicken on
Nov 12, 2008 1:48 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
it strikes me that maybe they’d do better waiting for the CC Sabathia circus to end, especially if the Yankees don’t win it.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on
Nov 12, 2008 1:50 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just want to see CC not go to the Yankees to eventually watch Hank Steinbrenner go irate and ape shit on Cashman.
Sergio Romo will gladly hand you a bench to sit on / GIANTSPACEâ„¢ / Adopted brother of the AnVil
by SoFa King Mike on
Nov 12, 2008 1:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Escobar is an above average offensive SS
and a very good defensive SS. He has only 1 year of service time. He’s very good, and cheap, and MLB ready. Taking contract situation, and injury concerns int account, the only SS who’re clearly more valuable are Hanley and Reyes.
With Escobar, they get a very good, very cheap MLB player, so the risk is much lower. He’s already proven. Maybe the upside with Escobar isn’t as high as that with a Heyward type package, but the risk is also much lower.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Nov 12, 2008 11:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tulowitzki
would be one guy I’d put above him since Tulo is supposed to be the heir apparent to Adam Everett and his bat obviously speaks for itself
Other than him though, you’re right, I don’t know how many other Shortstop’s are better than Yunel
by NeifiChicken on
Nov 13, 2008 9:32 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
although I supposed you account for him under “injury concerns” which is fair, but I think he only had the one groin injury and I don’t know if that will rear its head again.
I’d still put Tulo above Yunel easily though since he beats him on both sides of the field
by NeifiChicken on
Nov 13, 2008 9:33 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
if this is all teams are willing to give up for Peavy, we should be in on this. I’d totally give them Alderson/Noonan/B. Wilson for one of the best pitchers in baseball in a heartbeat. The arm trouble is a little worrisome, but dammit cy young potential makes it a gamble I’d be willing to take.
of course, i’m not seriously suggesting that this is realistic, just saying those offers are utterly ridiculous.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on
Nov 12, 2008 1:49 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I was thinking something similar
Trade for Peavy, sign CC…world series here we come! And imagine all of the excitement from all of our 1-0 wins!
Seriously, though, it would be nutty if the Padres gave us Peavy for Alderson, Noonan and Wilson, though.
Somewhat serious question: Would you give up two of our top four prospects in a package for Peavy? I think I might. What about three? I’m not sure about that…
Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense.
by thehavenot on
Nov 12, 2008 2:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
depends on which two… I don’t think I’d want to include Posey, but if it was 2 of the other 3, then probably.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on
Nov 12, 2008 2:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're grossly underrating Yunel Escobar.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Nov 12, 2008 11:11 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, I’m going by Grant’s formula ;)
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on
Nov 13, 2008 11:36 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yay!
As much flak as Sabean usually gets, I think he’s doing absolutely the right thing labeling Cain near-untouchable. The Pads screwed up telling everyone they were gonna trade the Peav.
by The Double Deuce on
Nov 12, 2008 1:50 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
Plus they further compounded this by saying a deal will be done before the winter meetings.
Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.
"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on
Nov 12, 2008 2:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+75
What if we told everybody that Barry Zito was untouchable?
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
by WilliamVanLandingham on
Nov 12, 2008 2:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, he’s certainly not unhittable.
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on
Nov 12, 2008 3:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
mmmmm
Duuuuffff
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Nov 12, 2008 6:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If they can sign a SP
at a reasonable price to hold a spot till Baumgarner is ready. Then I would deal Cain if I could get a great corner OFer. Otherwise, might as well keep him.
by Maxima231 on
Nov 12, 2008 6:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or...
sign Sabathia, hold on to Cain, and when Bumgarner/Alderson come up, you have 5 potential All-Stars! I can’t even begin to comprehend what that rotation would be like.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Nov 13, 2008 7:08 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe.
Moores’ divorce, and money problem have been long known. The fact that Moores and Sandy Alderson have refused to meet / talk with Trevor Hoffman, even though Hoffman is willing to take (much) less money to stay, pretty much tells everyone that Moores is broke.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Nov 12, 2008 11:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
This is Fred McGriff all over again, ironic since it’s the same teams, Pad and Braves, same situation, with the Padres cutting budget and the Braves ripping them off.
I wonder if Sandy Alderson saw that one coming, a divorce causing a fire sale.
For Peavy, I don’t see how Heyward and Hanson are not the start of the conversation, instead of a no-go. This is ridiculous if the Braves deal goes through, the Padres should get at minimum, something similar to what the A’s got for Haren or Mulder or Hudson (of course, their worse haul was from Atlanta so perhaps the Braves are good at ripping other teams off).
Yunel is nice but not a plus player but he should be a complementary piece of the deal, not the main entree. Jair Jurrgens should be the meat of the package if the Braves are unwilling to give up Heyward and Hanson. Getting Yunel allows the Padres to trade off Greene and save more money. If they are trying to save money, not sure why they picked up Giles option, maybe doing that means they don’t have dump Peavy so quickly.
Maybe get Flowers as they probably need a catching prospect too and the Braves have McCann. Plus throw in Jeff Locke and Julio Teheran. So that’s Jurrgens, Yunel, Flowers, Locke and Teheran. That’s not too bad, about as good as for Haren.
I like Samardzija but they don’t have enough prospects to afford a Peavy. Maybe get Sean Marshall too, but without Vitters, I don’t see how I would do a deal with the Cubs, their farm system is kind of dry.
Adoptive parental unit of Kevin " 2007's Most Spectacular Pitcher" Pucetas.
"I'm a Giant now... I like watching the ball get up there" - Wendell Fairley
"I'm really proud to be on this team." - Nate Schierholtz
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on
Nov 12, 2008 2:50 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yunel is nice but not a plus player but he should be a complementary piece of the deal, not the main entree
I’d consider Escobar a plus player, definitely the centerpiece of any trade.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 12, 2008 2:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really? Centerpiece? He’s a nice player, and I’ll give your fancy defensive stats the benefit of the doubt, but he can barely slug .400. Again, nice player. Probably a top-10 shortstop if his 2008 is his true level of performance. But Peavy’s a perennial Cy Young candidate with a below-market contract.
by Grant on
Nov 12, 2008 4:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What can I say, he’s a league average hitter and a above hitter average at SS. He could also be the best defensive SS in the NL. The fact that he doesn’t slug .400 isn’t really here or there. I’d say he’s not a top-10 but a top-5 SS in the NL. I’d stick Hanley and Hardy in front of him but he was as good as Jimmy Rollins last year. Who else would you place in front of him?
By my calculations, he’s worth about +4.25 wins above replacement which makes him worth about $18-20M as a FA. He’ll also be much cheaper over the next 3-4 years as compared to Hanley, Hardy, Guzman, Rollins, or any other top SS in the NL.
So yeah, I think he could be a centerpiece and getting Schafer and Morton alongside of him isn’t bad either. Peavy is great but I think Escobar is really getting low-balled here.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 12, 2008 4:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I forgot about Tulo because he was hurt this year, but you could move him in front of Escobar.
Hanley, Hardy, Tulo, Rollins, Escobar. That sounds about right.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 12, 2008 5:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jose Reyes, too! OK, I need to go eat something before I die.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 12, 2008 5:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I meant top-ten in baseball, by the by….
I’m always wary of the players who have the same stats in the majors that they did in the minors, at least intially. Escobar was a .300/.360/.400 guy in the minors, not exceptionally young for his leagues, and, whammy, he’s the same player in the majors. Of course, this is the same reason I didn’t sniff Hanley Ramirez in any fantasy draft prior to this season, so take it with a grain of salt.
If Escobar is the best defensive SS in the NL, I’ll concede my point. The best defensive SS + above avg. OBP = ridiculous value. I have to plead ignorance, though.
by Grant on
Nov 12, 2008 5:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
By EQA
Yunel Escobar was 8.5 runs above average offensively this season. 11.9 runs above average offensively last season. Defensively, both the BIS and STATS metrics rate him well. As do the Braves fans who participated in Tango’s scouting report. Sean Smith, the guy who does the Chone projection projects him at 6 runs above average defensively.
Peavy has a below market contract, yes. But Escobar has only one year of service time.
Hanley and Reyes are clearly more valuable than Escobar. Rollins is a better player, but under control for 3 more years, instead of 5. I’d probably take Rollins over Escobar. Hardy is probably better offensively, but there are questions about his D, and is under control for 2 years, as opposed to Escobar’s 5.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Nov 12, 2008 11:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A healthy Tulo is also probably better, no? But I agree, I think Yunel is underrated in the sense that he’s not a huge bat at SS like Hanley but he’s still very good.
I don’t see Hardy play much, but how big are the questions about his D? By plus/minus he was +7 in ’07 and +19 this year.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 13, 2008 5:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The STATS based stats
zone rating, and UZR don’t like Hardy. In 2007, zone rating had him 11 runs below average. In 2008, zone rating had 8.5 runs below average. Around June, MGL had a post on projecting team D, he supplied the numbers for the Brewers:
Branyan is +3 runs at 3B in 10 "games."
Counsell is -2 runs in 22 odd games at various positions.
Dillon is -1 in 10 games at various positions.
Fielder is -6 runs in 58 games.
Hall is -6 runs in 46 games.
Hardy is -7 in 66 games.
Rivera is -1 run in 1 game.
Weeks is -4 in 69 games.
Here are the same guys last year:
Fielder: -6 in 126 games.
Weeks: -20 in 105 games.
Hardy: -1 in 149 games.
Hall: -11 in CF in 122 games. (In 06, he was +7 in 118 games at SS, and in 05, he was +5 runs in 52 games at SS, so you would think he could play 3B just fine.)
The BIS based stats, plus minus, PMR, RZR like him.
I guess I should rephrase “there are questions about his D”, to “I’m not sure that his D will not be an issue in the future”.
Tulo vs Yunel, I’m of 2 minds. I can see arguments for both. Tulo doesn’t have much of a record, but the record that exist is pretty damn good.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on
Nov 13, 2008 7:25 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I get the feeling that Brewers fans aren’t that impressed by Hardy’s defense. Must be tough playing with Weeks on one side of you and Braun/Hall on the other, though. Sliding him over to third when Escobar is ready makes a lot of sense.
I’m still pretty skeptical about Tulowitzki. His defensive stats plummeted this year almost as much as his offensive stats.
by Evan on
Nov 13, 2008 8:47 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe tearing his quad slowed him down at the plate and in the field? I think he missed about 2 months with that injury.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 13, 2008 8:51 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No doubt. But it’s also possible that his awesome defensive stats in 2007 were an outlier (his hitting stats too, for that matter), and he’s just a very good fielder rather than a superhuman one. The same skepticism should probably apply to Escobar 2008 until he does it for another year or two.
by Evan on
Nov 13, 2008 9:09 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can buy that, Evan.
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on
Nov 13, 2008 9:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t like STATS based stats. I prefer GUT based stats.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on
Nov 13, 2008 1:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jair Jurrgens should be the meat of the package
I agree, but only because his name is fun to say.
/Swedish Chef
by chilibean_3 on
Nov 12, 2008 3:01 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Atlanta raped Detriot for Juregens. Renteria? thats sad
I see the future, and it is Pablo
by CB30 on
Nov 12, 2008 9:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There is something here....
The Giants have 4 prospects who could become all star caliber players. Alderson, Baumgarner, Posey and Noonan. If I was Sabean, and I think he is a terrible GM, I would be calling Sd and offering Alderson and Noonan and something for Peavy. Posey and Baumgarner are untouchable. IMO Alderson is better than any player being given up by ATL.
I would sign Teixera for 7/150M, sign Lowe for 3/44M and then trade Cain for a real corner OFer not name Hideki. As a side note. I would sign Juan Cruz to set up Wilson.
Lincecum, Peavy, Sanchez, Lowe and Zito isnt to bad there.
And a lineup with Tex and a good corner bat would be good enough to help this team out. This is just an idea. It saises payroll. But means your top 2 prospects stay and grow in the minors and Madison Baumgarner can slide into Lowes spot someday.
by Maxima231 on
Nov 12, 2008 3:04 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't like...
how the other half lives.
thinking about Cain being traded.
how Peavy grunts every pitch.
Prince Fielder for being so fat and running over Todd Greene.
by Cainer on
Nov 12, 2008 3:11 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Just think of how much cavier you would be able to get in Prince’s belly button.
by Lars The Wanderer on
Nov 12, 2008 3:15 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
fresh caviar, several fishes worth. ew.
by lincypoo i wuv u on
Nov 12, 2008 8:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You would need a pretty big spoon
I see the future, and it is Pablo
by CB30 on
Nov 12, 2008 9:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I get what you are trying to say
Matt Cain for Jake Peavy right?
Honestly though, I couldn’t agree more. You don’t say that you are going to trade a pitcher like Peavy (or even Cain) while they are under your control at a reasonable price. But if an amazing offer comes around, then yes, you have to pull the trigger.
Giants! Giants! HELP US GOD!
by j14 on
Nov 12, 2008 4:38 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t know enough about the prospects involved to offer an opinion on these particular trades, but in theory, dealing Peavy for prospects makes all the sense in the world. He’s great, but he’s not quite as great as his home park makes him look. He’s not overpriced, but he’s not exactly cheap either. He’s had nagging injury problems, and he has lost some velocity and some strikeouts, so there’s a very good chance that he’s going to get worse rather than better. Meanwhile, his team is terrible and has no farm system to speak of. He’s not going to pitch the Padres into the playoffs in the next few years, so the value in keeping him around is solely for marketing purposes and a slightly more respectable won-loss record. I don’t know how much that’s worth, but I’d rather have several young players with potential.
by Evan on
Nov 12, 2008 5:19 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
They have a very good farm system actually
I think BA had them ranked as 6th last year. Kyle Blanks, Kellen Kulbacki, Jaff Decker, McBryde, etc. are all VERY good prospects
by NeifiChicken on
Nov 12, 2008 5:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hmm. I’m living in the past again. How close are those guys to the majors?
by Evan on
Nov 12, 2008 5:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
living in the past?

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Nov 12, 2008 5:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
For my money the Padre farm system is bottom 10 easily
If BA has them as the 6th best system last year. they must have LOVED Headley. But he is in the majors. And there system is terrible now, in my opinion.
If they rank the Padres any higher than 20th I will lose alot of respect for the BA people.
The 4th best Giants prospect would top the padres prospect list I would think.
by Maxima231 on
Nov 12, 2008 6:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree with this
there’s no way a system that only had 2 players in their own top 100 (32 and 50 no less) could be 6th on their list.
Can't get enough of the Oakland A's or Golden State Warriors? Visit Oaktown Awesomer's and Golden Stat Hoops
by iamawesomer on
Nov 12, 2008 11:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So...
That’s what it looks like through the bent back tulips.
On a related note…Woo Hoo! The Beatles in a Harmonix project.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
by WalrusMan on
Nov 12, 2008 8:39 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Something beyond Sabean's comprehension
might be getting in a 3-way deal with the Pads and the Braves, with the key pieces being:
To the Pads: Jonathan Sanchez, Jordan Schafer
To the Braves: Jake Peavey
To the Giants: Yunel Escobar
There would have to be various assorted pieces thrown in – minor leaguers, relief pitchers, cash here or there, etc. – but it’s a nice start to a deal that would make all 3 teams happy.
Hector Sanchez: really getting tired of playing baseball in foreign countries...
by tedfordfan on
Nov 13, 2008 7:54 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
The Pads....
centerpiece is Yunel, Sanchez isn’t worth Yunel Escobar to them. They wouldn’t want that
by NeifiChicken on
Nov 13, 2008 9:39 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Does Kevin Towers have a crack addiction I don’t know about?
by oldjacket on
Nov 13, 2008 10:30 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
FINE
we’ll throw in Zito. happy now?
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Nov 13, 2008 11:34 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anybody think Cain's trade value is higher than Peavy's?
Cain is under team control for 3 years. Cain’s contract is a fraction of Peavy’s. Cain is younger, with no injury issues whatsoever so far. Cain is almost certain to improve on this year’s numbers, while Peavy may plateau or drop off.
This isn’t to say that Cain is a better pitcher. Just that because of Cain’s youth, talent, durability, and contract, I think that Cain is a more valuable commodity than Peavy.
I don’t think we should trade for Peavy, either.
by Gregjitsu on
Nov 13, 2008 12:01 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, i think Cain would be the more valuable player in a trade, for the reasons you suggest. Also, Jim Callis & Keith Law both said that Cain should be worth more, when asked about it.
Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!
by GiantFan on
Nov 14, 2008 3:26 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs













