Jon Heyman on the Cain for Fielder & Hardy rumors

• A Brewers official shot down the Internet rumor that had them possibly trading Prince Fielder and J.J. Hardy and a third player for Giants pitcher Matt Cain. Not that I really needed to hear that denial first-hand, as it wouldn't be an especially good move to trade either player straight-up for Cain. Hardy looked terrific in the playoffs, by the way.

9 months ago groug Comment 10 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Matt Cain wouldn’t be worth J.J. Hardy alone? Man, Heyman’s dumb.

What man? Which man? Who’s the man? When’s a man a man? What makes a man a man? Am I a man? Yes. Technically I am. - FotC

by jcb9 on Oct 7, 2008 4:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Yeah almost fell out of my chair reading that one.

Rafael Rodriguez: More tools than Home Depot.

by BrianBokake on Oct 7, 2008 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

Jon Heyman thinks that Francisco Rodriguez is the AL MVP this year.

..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.

by Cookyman on Oct 7, 2008 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

/spit take

I didn’t even realize these stupid things came from the same person.

by chilibean_3 on Oct 7, 2008 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

of course Heyman thinks that, have you had a look at Cain’s win-loss record?

by FluLikeSymptoms on Oct 7, 2008 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

i no longer take anything john heyman says about baseball seriously… lincecum wasn’t even in his top 3 for NL Cy Young

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on Oct 7, 2008 7:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

I am so tired of this rumor.

by KCE on Oct 7, 2008 9:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Jon Heder on the Cain for Fielder & Hardy rumors

GOSH!

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Oct 8, 2008 8:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

Heyman on the Dodgers

In his LCS preview, he had this to say about Ramirez’ contribution to the Dodgers:

This is not the same team that muddled through its first 100 games, impressing no one while winning only half its games in the NL Worst. Never has one man transformed a team like this.

His impact was so profound that the Dodgers were stunned into a 13-16 August. Only when their eyes became adjusted to the dazzle of his greatness were they able to put together a winning September, allowing them to barely win the weakest division in baseball.

Never? Really? Ever hear of a fellow named Ruth? Or how about Barry Bonds, who was added to a 72-win team that magically became a 103-win team the next season?

Scott McClain: Great story, no place on the 2009 Giants.

by EliminateMe on Oct 8, 2008 2:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs