Travis Denker gone...
...according to some know-nothing blogger posting from his mom's basem...
Wait, the blogger was Paul DePodesta? Dang. And Denker is off the 40-man-roster on the Giants' site.
Genius roster move by Sabean. Second basemen with patience and power grow on trees, while no-defense, no-offense, PED-lovin' catchers are rare, special treasures that should be protected by any means necessary before free agents like Omar Vizquel file for free agency. (Edit: Eliezer Alfonzo was removed from the 40-man too, so this point is bunk....)
Maybe there's an explanation. Maybe these were "revocable" waivers. Maybe Travis Denker intentionally killed an osprey with a baseball. Maybe.
But the "Sergio Romo-Accidentally-DFA'd-OMG-WUT"-thread was just so much fun that I had to put this on the front page.
(Edit II: Something we're not thinking about is that the organization will need to protect folks from the Rule 5 draft. I'll try and work up a list of who would be eligible. Thanks to Andrew Baggarly for pointing that out. Still, the outrage is both amusing and nourishing.)
2 recs |
390 comments
Comments
San Diego has fine weather
Time for Franny to step up
by wilriv21 on Oct 10, 2008 4:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess patience and power aren’t part of “The Giant Way.”
by jc2125 on Oct 10, 2008 4:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Doesn’t someone have to answer for this like Sabean or someone?!
I'm young but i didn't fall off the truck yesterday!
by jbowl on Oct 10, 2008 4:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Crapola
I wanted Denker to succeed here for no other reason than the Dodgers essentially gave him to us.
Anagram of "Giants pitcher Matt Cain" = TRAGIC MAN, ISN'T PATHETIC
by Stuttering John Tamargo on Oct 10, 2008 4:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Terrible move
Denker was very excited to be here and was an awesome guy. One of those gritty type players who gave everything, including playing on the Cal League Championship series a day or two after bruising his ribs trying to run over the catcher.
He’ll be missed for sure, and the Padres got a steal.
by henwo on Oct 10, 2008 4:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I might be alone in this sentiment but...
whatever
Brad Hennessey: the next Kevin Correia
Kevin Correia: the next Brad Hennessey
by stealth snail on Oct 10, 2008 4:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Son of Whatever
checking in
Charlie Hayes ate my homework
by glenallen hill's waterpipe on Oct 10, 2008 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You guys probably aren’t alone, but you shouldn’t be apathetic about this because it is a stupid fucking move by the Giants. It makes no sense, even if you don’t like Denker. There were much less talented players the Giants could have exposed.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Guess What? - They Did!
Correia, Hennessey, Esponilli, and McClain all made it thru waivers and we outrighted to Fresno.
I would have prefered that the Giants had keep Denker and exposed Alfonzo instead but it is a move that really doesn’t matter either way and therefore fully warrents a
WHATEVER!
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is a move that matters, Denker is probably the best 2B prospect in our system.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow, quite a vote of confidence for Nick Noonan there
by FluLikeSymptoms on Oct 10, 2008 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll take the guy who can hit in AAA over the guy who can’t hit in A. I’m honestly not a believer in Noonan, but I hope I’m wrong on that.
Noonan probably has a higher upside, but Denker seems like a pretty sure bet to be at least a solid 2B in the majors.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know this is late , but...
…please to be explaining how Hennessey – ESPECIALLY the Hennessey 2.0 which arrived late in the season – can be considered “much less talented”.
"Ain't got a hope in Hell - that's my belief." - Bon Scott
by victor frankenstein on Oct 14, 2008 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I assume this was meant as a reply to someone else, but I’ll field it.
Hennessey’s September numbers:
24.1 IP, 25 H, 9 K, 8 BB, 6 HR
That’s awful.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 14, 2008 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, Noonan’s probably better. and Frandsen’s probably got 2B on lockdown for next season.
Adopted Giant: Aaron King
Wearing the crown by 2011. Or at least the LOOGY hat
by baetown415 on Oct 10, 2008 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frandsen should certainly start the year at 2B, but there would have been no reason for him to block Denker.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If so
That’s really sad.
Proud father of Eric Surcamp!
by The Thrill on Oct 10, 2008 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I Fogot Ochoa Too
And my appologies to Espineli for mispelling his name with Esponilli.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Esponilli?
That sounds like a yummy Italian dish. Nah
Esponolli sounds better, YUM!
Pac Bell, SBC, AT&T, 2010=???
by jt_7241 on Oct 11, 2008 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It matters because we probably wouldn’t have lost Alfonzo through waivers
Adopted Son: Brad Hennessey. Beloved for a stolen base much like Dave Roberts
by AndYourBirdCanSing on Oct 10, 2008 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More Details
The Giants began the anticipated revamping of their pitching staff Friday, all but officially severing ties with right-handers Tyler Walker, Kevin Correia and Brad Hennessey. The trio was outrighted to Triple-A Fresno, along with catcher Eliezer Alfonzo, left-hander Geno Espineli and infielders Scott McClain and Ivan Ochoa. The Giants also activated left-hander Noah Lowry and right-hander Merkin Valdez from the 60-day disabled list and lost second baseman Travis Denker, who was claimed off waivers by the San Diego Padres.
http://sanfrancisco.giants.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081010&content_id=3609965&vkey=news_sf&fext=.jsp&c_id=sf
So the Giants didn’t keep anyone you all might think they shouldn’t have they just didn’t (for whatever reason) think Denker fit into their plans. I at least am fine with this.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, and you ignored a pretty important fucking point:
The moves left the Giants’ 40-man roster at 33 players.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which Just Says As I Said
They just didn’t (for whatever reason) think Denker fit into their plans. I at least am fine with this.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your blind faith severely discredits anything you say. The fact that they didn’t need to expose him makes this all the more stupid.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
/obligatory joke about CC and/or Benji and/or Sandoval requiring more than one space on the 40-man
by DividedByZero on Oct 10, 2008 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, weird. So they really are just dumping the guy for no apparent reason.
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially considering a couple more 40-man spots will clear up shortly with folks filing for free agency.
What man? Which man? Who’s the man? When’s a man a man? What makes a man a man? Am I a man? Yes. Technically I am. - FotC
by jcb9 on Oct 10, 2008 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems To Me That Not Fitting Into Their Plans Is An Apparent Reason
and a pretty good one at that.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s why players get traded, not released.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What Would Be The Point Of This?
All we could most likely get is the likes of Mark Sweeney.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even an A-ball pitcher with a torn rotator cuff is more likely to help you out down the road then nothing at all.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you have so much faith in the wisdom of this organization’s decisions?
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because I Like The Direction Since The MaGowan Is Leaving Announcement
and therefore Sabean has regained the benifit of the doubt from me that he had previously until just after the 2002 WS.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only direction I’ve noticed is the near-random shuffling of prospects from one level to another, which looks more like flailing than a coherent plan. And they had a great draft, but again that doesn’t indicate “direction.” What else have you seen that you like?
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What You See As "Near-Random"
I see as a very necessary seperating of the wheat from the shaft.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bottom Line
The Giants see Denker as Shaft (not wheat) and I have no problem with this.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chaff, and explain to us, other than using, “Sabean said so” as a reason, why they should do this.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’d know if you ever got wheat in your shaft.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Prefer Corn In My Shaft
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
by Outside The Box Thinking on Oct 10, 2008 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There’s a “sounds” joke in there somewhere…
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You see this cat Shaft is a bad mother—
(Shut your mouth)
But I’m talkin’ about Shaft
(Then we can dig it)
Zooperstars, they quack me up!
by Goofus on Oct 12, 2008 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You got wheat in my shaft. You got shaft in my wheat.
What man? Which man? Who’s the man? When’s a man a man? What makes a man a man? Am I a man? Yes. Technically I am. - FotC
by jcb9 on Oct 10, 2008 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shaft?
Wheat just got a whole lot sexier.
by chilibean_3 on Oct 10, 2008 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"wheat from the shaft"
Best eggcorn ever!
FYI: It’s “wheat from the chaff” for future reference.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There’s a farmer’s daughter joke in there somewhere…
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Got My Meaning Which Is What Matters Most
but thanks for the correction.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But as far as separating wheat from chaff … Ryan Rohlinger wasn’t ready for the majors but they promoted him anyway. Pablo Sandoval wasn’t ready for the majors but they promoted him anyway—and he had a hot streak, so now he’s penciled in as the starting first baseman. Denker wasn’t ready for the majors but hit well anyway—and now he’s gone. Velez, Bowker, Bocock … they’re giving players opportunities that they haven’t earned, and then making decisions about them based on microscopic sample sizes.
I know you have faith in their scouting prowess, but come on — this is amateur hour. Healthy franchises just don’t operate this way.
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention he’s trusting the Giants scouting in regards to hitting. Yeah, they’ve been money at that and deserve our blind trust.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somewhere this year, Baggerly mentioned that people in the organization were upset with Denker for not hustling or some kind of bad attitude they perceived in his time with the big club. Apparently that explained his lack of playing time, demotion, and ultimate banishment. In it’s own way it strikes me as the same ol’ knee-jerk Sabean kind of personal judgement. Make a face at being removed from a game or drop a ball at the wrong time and next thing you know you’re out of town.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 10, 2008 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way, Joe Nathan says ‘hey’.
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
by tobias on Oct 10, 2008 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
/sarcasm sensor in the shop…
So, not sure if you are referring to the idea of comparing Travis Denker’s upside to Nathan’s (which is not a great comparison), or if you are referring to the idea of Sabean writing someone off in a fit of pique (which was more the comparison I was going for).
I actually liked Denker’s upside a little bit. I don’t know that I had hopes of him becoming the next Jeff Kent, but to my eyes he looked like the better hitter, in comparison to Velez, Ochoa and even Frandsen. Defensively, he seemed more in Velez’ category. Still, I thought he deserved a longer look. I was looking forward to seeing him again next spring.
Furthermore, I don’t really see anything that Sabean has personally done to earn our new found undying trust. He got rid of Jack Hiatt and Matt Nerland (at long last, and I suspect under orders). He hired John Barr (at least I think it was Sabes who hired him). He cut some checks and got all the draft picks signed. Beefed up the international scouting and signing regimen.
He gets a polite golf clap from me for all of those things. And I haven’t seen any kind of brilliant, imaginative trades or scrap-heap signings this year. That’s more the type of thing I’m looking for that would give me hope that Sabean is back on the beam he fell off some six years ago.
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
by tobias on Oct 10, 2008 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
WEEEEEE, A FEW GOOD MONTHS. UNQUESTIONED LOYALTY!!!
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Magowan. Magowan. Magowan. Magowan.
HOW HARD IS IT!?
What man? Which man? Who’s the man? When’s a man a man? What makes a man a man? Am I a man? Yes. Technically I am. - FotC
by jcb9 on Oct 10, 2008 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet Magowan pressured Sabean into doing this!!
Wait…
by rotorueter on Oct 10, 2008 4:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Did you say Velez Gone....
uhhh, damnit. They let the wrong guy go.
My adopted son Matt Downs. Lost in the wilderness of mediocrity.
by nvsfg on Oct 10, 2008 4:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
um...WHAT?

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Oct 10, 2008 4:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Alright
Who left the gate open?
by rightcenterfielder on Oct 10, 2008 4:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is one of those times were you just have to go man these executives have to know something I don’t…they have to be smarter than me…don’t they?
by HitorMisch on Oct 10, 2008 5:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No, they don't.
"he walked 18; new league record! Struck out 18, another new league record! He also hit the sportswriter, the PA announcer, the bull mascot twice..."
by i did my job on Oct 10, 2008 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
at least the Dodgers are losing.
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
by nostocksjustbonds on Oct 10, 2008 5:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
oh man...
just when i was starting to think sabes was making some decent moves. I guess I don’t have to look too far to remember why I don’t like him though. If Denker (and ellison for that matter – hey, he still has time to develop!) turns out good like I think he will, I will personally haunt the crap out of sabean for at least like a year. At least.
by theghostofjasonellison on Oct 10, 2008 5:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well shit...
thats bad roster move #1 of the off-season in my book. I will try to keep a running total going.
Giants! Giants! HELP US GOD!
by j14 on Oct 10, 2008 5:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
weak
proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..
by Azmanz on Oct 10, 2008 5:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
unforgivable
Rafael Rodriguez: More tools than Home Depot.
by BrianBokake on Oct 10, 2008 5:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
saddening.... really saddening
Adopted Giant: Aaron King
Wearing the crown by 2011. Or at least the LOOGY hat
by baetown415 on Oct 10, 2008 5:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Does he have to be on their 25 man
next year? like was this a rule V draftee or what?
proud father of the newly acquired Brandon Crawford..
by Azmanz on Oct 10, 2008 5:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No, he doesn’t. This was just a waiver pick-up, so he gets put on the 40-man. And I’m also pretty sure there’s no more Rule V either.
by cornball on Oct 10, 2008 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no Rule V at all
The Rule 5 draft, however, is very much still in existence…
It will happen at the winter meetings in December.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 10, 2008 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not when it comes to the MLB rulebook, it doesn't...
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 11, 2008 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps, but most of the baseball media (BaseballProspectus, BaseballReference, Baseball America) uses them interchangeably.
I found this article written by a someone with ESPN who was similarly senstive to semantics, though::http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/transanctionsprimer.html
Perhaps it’s baseball’s version of Nu-cu-lur.
by rotorueter on Oct 11, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude.... FTW?
didn’t even give him a chance in September….
Adopted Giant: Aaron King
Wearing the crown by 2011. Or at least the LOOGY hat
by baetown415 on Oct 10, 2008 5:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get it
but I don’t think it’s gonna come back to bite us.
"Forget it Donny, you're out of your element"-Walter Sobchak
by icanplaythird on Oct 10, 2008 5:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This guy did something to piss management off. Wonder what it was?
It probably won’t turn out to be a big deal. But (a) there were other players who should have been cut first, and (b) the Giants wouldn’t have needed the roster space anyway if they hadn’t kept promoting players who obviously weren’t ready.
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 5:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn’t the Giants send him down abruptly after a he made a mental mistake in a game or something? That’s all I can remember.
by Dan from NM on Oct 10, 2008 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I repeat my "whatever" sentiment
There is just no way they got rid of him for the sole reason they thought he wasn’t good enough. He’s younger than our other second basemen in his league of talent, and its not like we’re exactly crunching for space on the 40 man. There is something else afoot, and none of us know what it is.
Brad Hennessey: the next Kevin Correia
Kevin Correia: the next Brad Hennessey
by stealth snail on Oct 10, 2008 5:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If that’s the case, huzzah for making decisions based on things other than talent. Anyways, there hasn’t even been a whisper of anything, so I think you’re really reaching here. To suggest that something exists, when you have no clue, seems fucked up.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know what you're sayin...
But IMO it’s even more fucked up if they are releasing him based on talent.
Brad Hennessey: the next Kevin Correia
Kevin Correia: the next Brad Hennessey
by stealth snail on Oct 10, 2008 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If something comes out, and it’s a legit reason, I’ll accept it. But it better be the level of Brett Myers or Elijah Dukes and not some Lastings Milledge shit.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
whats getting lost in this...
Their GM has a freaking blog in which he rationally explains things to the fans. WTF?!! That is one of the best things I’ve seen. Can new ownership demand that Sabean does this?
Now you see that evil shall always triumph over good, because good is dumb!
by TrojanCBB on Oct 10, 2008 5:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
…use a computer?
Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.
by jasomack on Oct 10, 2008 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry: New management does BOOKS not Blogs
It’s “The Giant Way”!
Charlie Hayes ate my homework
by glenallen hill's waterpipe on Oct 10, 2008 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
DePodesta isn’t their GM, actually. That would be Kevin Towers.
What man? Which man? Who’s the man? When’s a man a man? What makes a man a man? Am I a man? Yes. Technically I am. - FotC
by jcb9 on Oct 10, 2008 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s also sort of a reverse-psychology tool. He sometimes pumps up trade-bait guys by talking about how clutch they are, when he actually doesn’t believe in that stuff.
by rotorueter on Oct 10, 2008 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Payoff...
…..for all the dumb roster moves that the Giants made during 08.
Seriously – Alfonzo needed to be kept on the 40-man? He could easily be repalced by a younger career minor-leaguer [with better defense] if needed down the line.
Also surprised that both Correia and Hennessey were jettisoned. I figured it’d be one or the other, not both.
Not sure what this means for the 5th starter next year…..
by aGIANTfan on Oct 10, 2008 6:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Please stop saying that. It’s silly.
Billy Hayes: His job is better than yours.
by delorean on Oct 10, 2008 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like whatever
Adopted Son: Brad Hennessey. Beloved for a stolen base much like Dave Roberts
by AndYourBirdCanSing on Oct 10, 2008 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you have the vocabulary of a 15-year-old girl, and your writing is worser.
Brian Sabean figures that if he buys enough bottles, one of them is bound to have lightning in it.
by jasomack on Oct 10, 2008 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This chasm is deep.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
MaGowan ain't a name
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 10, 2008 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Silly comments
He’s been on fire, I’d just let him keep going.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think exposing Denker before Alfonzo is criminally stupid. Also, I’m not sure how roster stuff works with guys whose contracts are up, but what about Yabu and Vizquel?
Billy Hayes: His job is better than yours.
by delorean on Oct 10, 2008 6:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yabu Is Not Even Arbitration Eligable Let Alone Free Agent Eligable
Both Aurilia and Vizquel stay on the 40 Man Roster until they file for Free Agency sometime with two weeks of the end of the World Series.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t get it all. Denker might never amount to anything, but he looked like he could be a strong offensive performer for a second baseman.
Stupid start to the offseason.
by Dan from NM on Oct 10, 2008 6:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I liked all the stupid trade Matt Cain threads better than this. Grass is always greener my ass.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
He reminds me a bit of a young Jeff Kent when he first came up with the Blue Jays. He’s probably a tweener — right now, he doesn’t have the glove to play 2B, or the bat to play 1B — but if he ever improves (and he’s at an age where that wouldn’t surprise me), he could be very good. But just because odds are he won’t reach that level doesn’t excuse waiving a player with that potential.
That being said, they obviously saw something they didn’t like in him. I believe it happened in Colorado, and there was something mentioned in the paper — he didn’t run out a groundball or pop-up, or something like that. After that, he didn’t play, and there was even a comment dropped in the paper about how his play had gone downhill due to inactivity, and he was never seen again.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously Sabean And Company Didn't See Jeff Kent In Him
and I will take their scouting expertise over yours every day of every week.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don’t need my scouting expertise, you have statistics. Good ones, too.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minor League Stats Don't Always Translate Into MLB Sucess
It takes scouting to know who likely will and who likely won’t.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither do scouting reports.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or maybe they did see Jeff Kent in him, and now they can’t look at him anymore without remembering that disgusting night.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Oct 11, 2008 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon, we are talking Travis Denker
The way McCoven talks about this fella we should be seeing him in the Mid-Summer Classic for the next ten years
by wilriv21 on Oct 10, 2008 7:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, this is the sort of decision where you look silly when you bitch about it, because the odds are good that Denker will never amount to anything. It’s still a stupid decision. We’re talking about a player who just turned 23, can hit a little, and isn’t hapless in the field. In their current state, the Giants should be thrilled to have a player like that.
by Evan on Oct 10, 2008 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes
He can hit some, and we aren’t exactly overflowing with exciting options for 2b. The dodgers gave him to us for basically nothing. He’s still young. How could this happen? Alfonzo stays but no Denker?
Less arm, more talk. Raisingcain is a GAMER.
Adopted Giant: Henry Sosa
by raisingcain on Oct 10, 2008 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Others outrighted: infielders Scott McClain and Ivan Ochoa, left-hander Geno Espineli and catcher Eliezer Alfonzo.
by wilriv21 on Oct 10, 2008 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there is a reason the dodgers gave him to us for nothing. If they thought he had even a remote chance of being good they would have never traded him to us.
Proud father of Eric Surcamp!
by The Thrill on Oct 10, 2008 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that’s why we threw in Francisco Liriano.
by kingofthacove on Oct 11, 2008 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have read many sites where his upside/ceiling is utility player. Those players are a dime a dozen and replaceable.
by wilriv21 on Oct 10, 2008 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, are you serious? Because some sites say that?
What about stats or watching him play yourself? The Giants system, while much improved from a few years ago, does not have Travis Denkers a dime a dozen. Maybe some systems do, but not us.
Less arm, more talk. Raisingcain is a GAMER.
Adopted Giant: Henry Sosa
by raisingcain on Oct 10, 2008 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denker is a player who three peated Hi A ball, was horrible at AA and finally show a little at AAA. Third at best on the organizational chart – that would be without including Nooner and Burriss at 2b. He was expendable.
by wilriv21 on Oct 11, 2008 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denker is a player who three peated Hi A ball, was horrible at AA and finally show a little at AAA.
Denker’s career path:
17 y-o, Rk: .270/.373/.426. Nice line, but the Dodgers kept him in Rk league for another year.
18 y-o, Rk: .311/.378/.556(!).
19 y-o, A/A+: .281/.390/.489. Again a nice line, but for some reason the Dodgers kept him in A/A+ for another year
20 y-o, A/A+: .247/.375/.399 – not great, but still OK for a 2B. The dodgers kept him for another year in A ball:
21 y-o, A+: .300/.379/.461.
This year he split his time between A+, AA, AAA, and the majors. He was horrible in AA – in 76 AB’s! He went on to hit .282/.373/.468 in 220 AB’s in AAA.
Career line: .276/.376/.454./.841.
He “three peated” Hi A ball, but it’s not like it was his fault – he’s never had an OPS under .769. He’s a good, young hitter who plays a pretty hard position. There’s no reason to throw these kind of players away.
Third at best on the organizational chart – that would be without including Nooner and Burriss at 2b. He was expendable.
Huh? I’ll give you Frandsen, though the differnce between them isn’t that big. Who’s the other guy – Velez? Denker is better and younger. Burriss is a SS, and Noonan was in A ball this year, and didn’t really hit well.
And it’s not like we needed more room on the roster – right now we have 33 players on the 40 man, and that includes Vizquel, Aurilia, and Yabu. This was a stupid move, no matter how you slice it.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you
I didn’t think Wil was the type to spout "statistical lies" — that is, facts which are technically true, but have all context and nuance purposely stripped away — but you did a great job of exposing them. I only have one more I’d like to add — let’s compare that Denker career line to Wil’s prefered Travis:
Travis Denker (age 23) — Minors career: .276/.376/.454/.830
Travis Ishikawa (age 25) — Minors career: .260/.355/.454/.809
Travis Ishikawa — AB’s in A/A+ ball: 1235
Travis Denker — AB’s in A/A+ ball: 1350
So Wil, if all Denker’s time in A-ball fails to off-set his success in AAA/MLB, and means he’s not worth keeping, how come you were pimping TI (who’s 2 years older, plays a less demanding position, and spent just about as much time in A-ball) this year, even before he ever appeared in AAA?
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 11, 2008 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair, Ishikawa also has 808 career PA’s in Norwich, where XBH go to die.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be clear
I’m not trying to say Denker is better than Ishikawa, just that it seems silly think that a person could be so high on TI and so down on Denker based on nothing but their minor league stats.
I actually like Ishikawa very much, and want him to be given a fair shot to win the 1B gig, but I could easily slam him by saying he three-peated AA before putting up good numbers there. I just think that’s largely irrelevant when he has recently shown improvement in AAA/MLB — just as Denker did.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 11, 2008 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aside from what Cookyman posted,
AGE. AGE. AGE.
Denker was in some cases, VERY YOUNG for his leagues. This isn’t some 26-27 year old, like Eugenio Velez, who had to repeat levels even though he was old for his levels, before he could post above league average numbers.
For comparison Denker is TWENTY THREE years old next season. Eugenio Velez is TWENTY SEVEN years old next season.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Oct 11, 2008 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was a potentially plus bat at 2B. Why throw that away when you don’t have to? It’s just plain stupid.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's perform a scientific experiment, wilriv
Take a $20 bill out of your wallet, then go to the bathroom and flush it down the toilet. I’ll wait.
…
Okay, did you do it? No? Why not? Because that $20 bill is incredibly important to your future, or just because there’s no sense in wasting it for no reason?
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 10, 2008 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How long has the organization had the kid? Time enough to evaluate his talents and form an opinion.
by wilriv21 on Oct 10, 2008 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This
And if you put that $20 in a CD, you might end up with $25. Hey, that’s five free bucks just for holding on to your $20. There’s absolutely no reason not to hold on to that $20 unless you’re getting something in return.
Let’s just assume that Denker doesn’t fit into the Giants’ future plans. Fair enough. They don’t see him as a piece of their puzzle. But suppose that some other team is intrigued by him and is willing to give us a middle-of-the-road to decent prospect that we do like. Five dollars! It is a loss to completely give up on a young player because you lose the potential to turn him into something you might want down the road.
by cornball on Oct 10, 2008 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And considering that the 3rd team that had the chance to take him, did, it would seem he has value to other teams.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
iawtc
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Oct 11, 2008 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well there’s an encouraging start to our offseason.
not
Less arm, more talk. Raisingcain is a GAMER.
Adopted Giant: Henry Sosa
by raisingcain on Oct 10, 2008 7:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Question: somewhat related
Would you rather have Travis Denker or Eugenio Velez?
Adopted Giant: Aaron King
Wearing the crown by 2011. Or at least the LOOGY hat
by baetown415 on Oct 10, 2008 8:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Question
Why are Bocock AND Velez still here and Denker not?
"Strikeouts are boring - besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. More democratic."
by giants9107 on Oct 10, 2008 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bocock probably for emergency reasons, i.e. Burriss or Ochoa get injured
Velez because…. um… speed?
Adopted Giant: Aaron King
Wearing the crown by 2011. Or at least the LOOGY hat
by baetown415 on Oct 10, 2008 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ochoa gone too
Complete list
"Strikeouts are boring - besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. More democratic."
by giants9107 on Oct 10, 2008 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denker, easily. Younger, has a better approach, and a clue.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 10, 2008 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wtf
Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
PABLO SANDOVAL AM STEAL DEATH, DESTROYER OF WORLDS.
by jponry on Oct 10, 2008 8:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This move tastes of dumb
Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense.
by thehavenot on Oct 10, 2008 9:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Depends on who goes on the 40-man of course
But losing Correia and Denker just doesn’t seem wise.
by Change Up on Oct 10, 2008 9:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wish I knew more about roster rules to put the move in context. Are the Giants essentially picking Jesse English or something over Denker, or what? Are they making room to select somebody else’s prospect exposed in the Rule 5 draft?
by Dan from NM on Oct 10, 2008 9:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If they are, why don’t they expose him later?
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So their remaining
second basemen at this point are . . . . Kevin Frandsen and Eugenio Velez, with Burris apparently now a lock at SS, but with no backup anywhere on the horizon?
Plus, we just dumped several usable pitching parts in a possible package.
And some of you are happy with this?
NO, we're not trading Matt Cain! What's that you say? We are? Armageddon is upon us!
by Buck Henry on Oct 10, 2008 9:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Pitchers Outrighted Have Negative Trade Value
The salries they would get in arbitration exceed their actual value for any team that traded for them.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
P.S.
If this wasn’t the case another team would have claimed them off of waivers (like what happened to Denker) if they were willing to pay the salary they would likely be awarded in arbitration.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
rainman, all well and good, but
when does the arbitration deadline kick in, and did this have to be done now? Were they sent back down off the 40-man roster to avoid an arbitration obligation, or does having them outrighted give these guys the chance to become FAs now?
Second, who is our backup SS?
Lastly, could this mean we’re going to see Gillaspie and Crawford sooner than we think?
NO, we're not trading Matt Cain! What's that you say? We are? Armageddon is upon us!
by Buck Henry on Oct 10, 2008 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Giants Have Cleared The Space On The 40 Man Roster
for prospects they might lose in the Rule 5 draft and players they plan to either aquire by trade or free agency. I don’t think they had to do all of these moves now but they did have to do at least one to make room for their two 60 Day DL players (Lowry and Valdez) that had to be restored to the 40 Man Roster (already had room for one). I suspect that they did it now so that the players outrighted can get a head start as free agents and are not left wondering if the Giants intend to keep them or not.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i hope not
It would be pretty inexcusable of management to even possibly rely on seeing Crawford jump levels faster then most. Prospects are called “prospects” for a reason – there’s a possibility they’ll work out, but it’s not a certainty. Denker was a MUCH bigger certainty of contributing then Crawford is right now; hell, Crawford has held a wood bat (hehehe….) for maybe a month at most. And Gillaspie? I don’t care how good his approach is, there is no need to rush him, and no need to move him off 3rd. Rohlinger is no lock to be a ML first baseman, and Villalona might not make the switch (assuming he makes it to the majors… it looks good now, but again, he’s a prospect not a ml player…).
Oh, and our backup SS? The guy we should have kicked off the 40-man roster without being worried about his being claimed, Bocock. But while Alfonzo is still there, let’s get him some grounders at short so he can make himself frickin useful. Pisses me off……
by theghostofjasonellison on Oct 10, 2008 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
alfonzo is gone as well
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 10, 2008 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
NOOO
just kidding, i never liked him. Still though, frandsen needs to be comfortable at a position (he really started hitting with the Giants when they let him settle at 2b instead of shifting him around). Alfonzo at short would have been a huge relief for the guy, and quite amusing for us
by theghostofjasonellison on Oct 10, 2008 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Giants May Still See Frandsen As Acceptable As A Backup SS
That said I also think it is safe to expect the Giants will sign or trade for a middle infilder that can play SS to provide the needed depth. They will not be standing pat here.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can see Franny and Velez as emergency backups while Bocock toils in Fresno and would come up in case of a Burriss injury
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 10, 2008 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Velez at Shortstop is what nightmares are made of.
by rotorueter on Oct 10, 2008 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Remember how the Giants were trying Franny at short when Omar went down in spring training and they realized he couldn’t play the position? And Velez wouldn’t be considered at short stop on my fat man softball team.
by Fresburg on Oct 11, 2008 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thus the “emergency” moniker. They would play 2 games tops until bocock could be brought up
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 11, 2008 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frandsen’s tendons seem to not like him at SS.
Travis Denker can hit a little. That's why I drive his bus. Not much about baseball here .
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
nor his glove.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 11, 2008 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
JESUS
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 10, 2008 10:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
3B
since Denker could play a little 3B, the candidates to start at 3B are now Rohlinger, Frandsen, Pablito and Mystery 3B. Not only that, but unless we sign a FA at 3B and/or 2B, we are ridiculously thin at those positions in the upper minors. Removing Depth for shits and giggles is not a sound organizational philosophy. Outrighting Bocock would have made more sense (not much more, because he looks to be the AAA starting SS next year, but still).
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 10, 2008 10:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I Think You Can Take It To The Bank That The Giants Will Add A 3B This Offseason
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
at this point that is the only move that makes sense. I’m hoping for a AAA 3B and not another Castillo look-a-like, but maybe that’s too much to ask from this organization
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 10, 2008 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought that last year
And we got Jose Castillo.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 10, 2008 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He Is Available Again!
Ducks all incoming items.
by giantsrainman on Oct 10, 2008 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meant to add....
…in my earlier post;
for me Denker > Frandsen. I’ve never understood the relative fascination with Frandsen.
Denker’s weaknesses – poor defender, sluggish baserunner – are matched by Frandsen. Denker’s hitting potential for me is significantly higher than Frandsen’s, and he’s 4? years younger.
I guess if you’re a local kid, and a perceived ‘gamer’, that outweighs talent in this org….
by aGIANTfan on Oct 10, 2008 10:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we all see Denker is the more patient hitter, or least takes more walks. He’s also younger. But in 05 and 06 Frandsen put up minor league numbers at a variety of levels that seem to say “give him a shot.” I think the fascination comes from us fans waiting for that “shot”.
Castillo got the DFA. Guestimate for Castillo DFA to come before the 2009 season = 2.
by kennv on Oct 12, 2008 6:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh
I wish he had made it to Oakland… he’s a damn sight better hitter than Eric Patterson or Cliff Pennington.
Just another brick in the wall…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 10, 2008 11:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Shouldn’t have done all that winning in the first half.
Travis Denker can hit a little. That's why I drive his bus. Not much about baseball here .
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Might not have if the Cubs had done them the favor of trading for Harden in April
especially since that might have caused an extra couple hundred ABs of suckage from Patterson and Matt Murton.
C’est la vie.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 12, 2008 2:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
Sorry Travis, I guess I wasn’t a good enough adoptive father to you. In fact, I think someone stole you from me. But anyway, it was fun while it lasted, especially that part where my adoption of Mark Sweeney turned into a semi-promising young 2B. Sigh. Have a nice life.
Adopted Giant: Travis Denker. Good?
by scotterduder on Oct 11, 2008 12:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oops. I remember looking for Denker on the adoption list and not seeing him.
My bad.
Travis Denker can hit a little. That's why I drive his bus. Not much about baseball here .
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, don’t worry about it. I was like the neglectful father who is too busy working or boozing, and you’re the friendly and non-threatening mentor who plays catch with him. I’m just glad someone was around to stand up for him…because it totally worked out, right? Time to be depressed again…
Adopted Giant: Travis Denker. Good?
by scotterduder on Oct 11, 2008 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
awful move
I remember Sabean making a comment about how “we’re all rooting for Frandsen” to win the 2B job. What the hell does that mean? And is that how he came up with the idea to get rid of all the competition?
by kingofthacove on Oct 11, 2008 12:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I Hear You On This
Making the statement “We’re all rooting for Frandsen” doesn’t make it look like a fair competion to Velez either even though he is staying.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ignorance begets confidence
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Can Understand Disagreeing But
“I am still very unhappy” seems extream. This just isn’t that big of a deal to get all upset over. In the long run (or for that matter the short run) it is very unlikely to have any effect on the results the Giants produce.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 2:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s because you have missed the boat.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 2:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank God! Doesn't Sound Like The Kind Of Boat I Would Want to Catch.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 2:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
YEs tHE LOgIC BoAt iS LeSS FuN tHaN iT SOUndS
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I have a feeling Denker had some clubhouse problems. I mean besides his obvious defensive flaws, I don’t see a bat like that getting flushed away by 2 organizations so quickly.
"Don't trust anyone under the age of 30" - Brian Sabean
by Smotheredinhugs on Oct 11, 2008 5:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ridiculous
I’m in agreement with lots here in being pretty unhappy with this, it’s a terrible move that makes no sense whatsoever. The thing that’s baffling about this move is that there just isn’t any logic behind it. I can understand, although disagree, if the organisation doesn’t think highly of him, but there’s seeminly no purpose to getting rid of him now.
We’ve got loads of room on the roster, we may have to protect a few from the draft, but we had plenty of room to do that anyway, and if we have problems due to future aquisitions (which i doubt, given the amount of space we have) then we could make this decision then. It’s a very dissapointing & negative start to the offseason.
Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!
by GiantFan on Oct 11, 2008 6:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Guys from the draft don't need to be protected
Only guys who are 4 years from their first pro contract, if they signed at 19 or older, or 5 years, if they signed below the age of 19, get exposed in the rule 5; thus necessitating being placed on the 40 man to protect them.
ZIPS: Milledge: 466 HR, 485 2B, 2282 hits, 278-379-524
by rfloh on Oct 11, 2008 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, i do know that, but can understand where my comment wasn’t clear. The point is, i don’t believe we have that many players to protect from the rule 5, and certainly not many that are preferable prospects to Denker.
Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!
by GiantFan on Oct 12, 2008 2:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very Surprised
I agree with all of you guys about losing Denker, but I can’t believe how everyone is focusing on that when the fact that Correia and Hennessey being dumped is so much more important. Sabean said they would not go into the FA market for starters, yet they now have just four. (you can’t count Noah Lowry) I think it’s obvious that Neukom is starting to exert his influence, and the Giants’ are going to make a serious run at a top starter. To me, the excitement over that trumps the loss of Denker. I can’t see Travis doing anything at the big league level that would make me think in the future that I’m sorry they went with Frandsen, Velez or someone not here yet. With regards to Denker, I really don’t see how his perfomance this year could have turned them off to such an extent. Might it have been something personal?? He should have been called up in Sept. and wasn’t, and now he’s just dumped. Is it possible he rubbed people the wrong way??
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 6:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Correia and Hennessey
I thought they were outrighted to Fresno and weren’t claimed.
Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense.
by thehavenot on Oct 11, 2008 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
in order to do that, the Giants had to pass them through waivers. That would certainly mean they’re not in the Giants’ plans for 2009.
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry for the hasty uninformative incorrect response. All of the players outrighted yesterday except for Espinelli have the right to declare themselves free agents, and with the exception of Kevin Correia, have already informed the Giants they will. I’m sure Kevin will follow, as he’s the most likely to get a decent FA contract.
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, I see
That was something I had sort of known but didn’t quite think of.
That’s kind of a shame. Both Correia and Hennessey looked really bad last year, but I’d like to see if one of them could have rebounded. Not likely, but still…
Catcher are base running. Hitters are offense.
by thehavenot on Oct 11, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hennessey looked a lot better in his September call-up. Well, better than “horrible” is not great, but I agree that dumping both him and Correia seems like a mistake.
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Oct 11, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Problem was the money. Because they can’t offer less than 80% at arb Henny’s got to make 1.4 mil next year and Kevin about a mil. I guess the org figures if they’re not going to get their monies worth of production from either, and I can’t say I disagree. If they’re going to get total crap from the #5 starter, they might as well get it for league minimum from a Misch, or if they’re going to pay decent money they need to get decent production.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 11, 2008 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus The Way The Arbitration Process Works They Would Get A Raise
2nd Year Arbitration players don’t get reductions for just sucking they have to be injured. If the Giants offered th 20% reduction the arbitrator would just award the up to 50% raise the players asked. For the Giants to win the would have to offer a smaller raise but a raise non the less.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
1.4 mil for sub replacement pitching. That’s a smart call, though I do think Correia still has some upside.
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meh.
Count me amongst those who just doesn’t think Hennessey will ever be more than a replacement level pitcher.
Baggs seemed tot hink that things have gone sour between Correia and the organization. Hopefully, they can make up, because Correia can still contribute at the MLB level.
Travis Denker can hit a little. That's why I drive his bus. Not much about baseball here .
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand these moves...
And I don’t feel like digging stuff out for myself. What just happened? Is Denker absolutely gone or can we pull him back? Why aren’t we keeping Espineli up? Who’s our fifth starter now if Lowry gets busted again?
Barry Zito - Mildly half-OK! Sometimes.
by Revolution1 on Oct 11, 2008 8:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
it’s probable that we sign a free agent 5th starter, but misch would be our 6th behind lowry right now
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 11, 2008 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh right. Signing people.
I guess a fifth starter shouldn’t be TOO hard to find (hoping I don’t regret this statement later). But what about Espinelli? He looked sort of okay. Did he go back to Fresno to work on stuff or what? What does our bullpen look like now? Are we going to pick up more bullpen guys?
Barry Zito - Mildly half-OK! Sometimes.
by Revolution1 on Oct 11, 2008 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He gone!
Put it on the… ok, that’s clearly in profoundly poor taste.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 11, 2008 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s just horrid
Todd Jennings: If he's on the DL, he can't suck as much, right?
by Speedforthewin on Oct 11, 2008 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'll get no arguments from me
I think Hawk Harrelson is the worst broadcaster in all of sports, and that’s saying a LOT.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 11, 2008 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The obligatory Denker Career path Chart

by jctGamer on Oct 11, 2008 9:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey
I remember making that, but I don’t remember why.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if your serious, when denker got demoted from AAA to A-ball during the minor league all star break.
Pac Bell, SBC, AT&T, 2010=???
by jt_7241 on Oct 11, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I knew
I picked the wrong off-season to stop sniffing glue
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN
by zenbitz on Oct 11, 2008 9:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s never too late to start again.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good-bye my son
Well, he’s now in an organization which will better be able to appreciate his Todd Walker-esque skillset.
Denker could have been a cheap, good hitting second baseman for a long time. Now we’re stuck hoping that either Kevin Frandsen’s too-old-for his level minor league numbers translate to the majors or that Eugenio Velez figures out how to play baseball.
Travis Denker can hit a little. That's why I drive his bus. Not much about baseball here .
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 9:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Denker’s problem was that he was a lousy defensive second baseman. He didn’t fit in with the pitching, speed and defense mantra that the Giants’ are spouting. Perhaps the Padres’ slogan for next year includes the word “hitting.”
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps the Padres’ slogan for next year includes the word "hitting."
Giants’ slogan: “Oh yeah, and hitting.”
I saw him play a number of games in Fresno/Sacramento, and he was a lot better at second than Ivan Ochoa was. I think Denker’s main problem was that he was a bit of a fatty, and didn’t look like a second baseman.
Travis Denker can hit a little. That's why I drive his bus. Not much about baseball here .
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way that Velez is better defensively. And this whole “mantra” is a joke – it’s just a pathetic attempt to distract the fans from the total lack of hitters on the team. Our big off season signing was Rowand, and he doesn’t fit that mantra either.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He sort of fits the defense mold if you look mostly at reputation…
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
eh
The point is that good players win ballgames. It doesn’t matter if they’re good thanks to their defense, or speed, or hitting, or whatever. Good players are good. You don’t give away for free a player that could be good one day just because he doesn’t fit the “mantra”.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 11, 2008 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn’t agree more.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He sort of fits the defense mold if you look mostly at reputation revulsion …
There now its fixed!
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 11, 2008 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get it now!
This is the Giants Way!
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 11, 2008 11:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
giving away useful players to inter divisional rivals for free
The Giants Way.
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen brother!
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 11, 2008 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, if you want to get technical
intra-divisional rivals. Inter division would be to another division.
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Technical/Logical
Doesn’t fit into the Giants Way
Don't think, it could only hurt the ballclub.
by ResDog on Oct 12, 2008 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amen brother!
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 12, 2008 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So then the Reds our infra-divisional rivals?
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Giants Way, indeed
Whether or not we’ll all look back one day with regret over this move isn’t really the main point for me. I mean, sure, Denker showed real signs of being a Major League caliber hitter—more so than Velez or Frandsen, so I’m not happy about losing him. But if the point is only, “we lost Travis Denker”, I don’t know that I’m going to lose a ton of sleep over it.
What bothers me more is the lack of any apparent benefit to this move, and what it says about the person making the move. The Giants are dumping a middle infielder—an area where they’re demonstrably weak—and a middle infielder who is young and had some nice upside with his hitting—another area where they’re demonstrably weak. Denker had a chance to become a valuable player—a better chance than some of the guys who remain on the 40-man, and definitely a better chance than the seven empty spots left on the 40-man. And the dumping of Denker yields… what benefit? Increasing the savvy, good clubhouse guy quotient?
So, the larger issue is that Sabean still appears to be an idiot. I get releasing Denker if there’s something better in the wings waiting to take his spot. But clearly that isn’t the case here. This just smells of another in Sabean’s long line of dumb, incomprehensible moves for six years running now. I doesn’t give me any confidence that the bigger moves still to come this offseason will be any better.
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
by tobias on Oct 11, 2008 12:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Plus its worth remembering that in a way this stems from all the Beach Roster Bingo madness that went on all 2008. I guess for me the crux of the issue is that the organization is now trying to sell me on the notion of a long term development plan, but the specific moves so often seem to be arbitrary and capricious. To me those two things just don’t jibe together. Long term plans take patience, thoroughness, communication, some sense of performance benchmarks for the kids coming up.
Did Denker not work the way they thought appropriate? Did he fail to hustle in one of his sporadic appearances? Well I can think of a couple of high profile players currently competing in the LCS who had similar stumbles this year, and their organizations took steps: they talked to them; told them what the expected; meted out appropriate punishment; and went on about their business. What they didn’t do was stick the offending player into an irretrievable dog house and then whisper mean things about them through back channels to the press.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 11, 2008 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess 6 out of 7 aint bad.
The Denker choice is just too much stupidity and arrogance mixed together. No I don‘t care to figure the ratio either its enough for me to know its bad. I don’t care if Denker never sticks at the Mlb level a 23 year old playing 2nd in Fresno learning the game. Not a bad thing. In fact a better then Zorak considering were the talent is, and isn’t, currently in this franchise.
Before someone brings up "Trust the scouts" it a moot point. One the scouts are not making the choice. Two tell me how well you enjoyed Joe Castle this season over Buscher? Because had the system been handled properly ( ie. think about more then 1-2 moves ahead of time) that would have been our choice in 2008.
The other 6 are not bad though. In years past I could see a Correia or Hennessy being kept. In franchise just interested in getting by would have kept one or both and hoped they turned out well enough to get some one’s O.K low level protect. You know like he Sabean does with a veteran free agent position players once they have gone over the cliff. To me this makes me think the front office is looking at bringing in 2 guys to compete for the bottom of the rotation. Sorry Rainman but C.C. is not one of them.
Ochoa it was fun and thanks for ‘08!
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 11, 2008 12:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Brian Buscher is an excellent parallel to this. Brian Buscher isn’t an amazing player (730 OPS as a 27 year old) and it really doesn’t impact the team THAT much that we lost him, but there was no point in releasing him if we didn’t have anyone demonstratively better to replace him.
by rotorueter on Oct 11, 2008 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bushcer
Was not protected in the Rule V Draft and the Twins selected him. The Giants will have some tough decisions this winter on who they will have to protect.
by wilriv21 on Oct 11, 2008 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the last sentence does amazingly little to inspire me with confidence for the front office.
Thankfully Nov 20 is the deadline for that. ( If I remember correctly). So the W.S. will be over and perhaps a old vet or two is dropped for room.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 11, 2008 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well I agree it does not give the Giants the pennant. But Buscher would look real good at third now tell the team got a better then "meh" third baseman. The Cost of Buscher could go up. They sign a fugly contract with a banged up Crede or trade for a broken Blalock and the Buscher move takes ona whole new level of "not badness" that could have been avoided.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 11, 2008 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the Giants were just attempting to remove these players from the 40 man roster. Perhaps they thought that Denker would clear waivers. To be honest, I would have thought Correia and Hennessey would have been claimed before Denker.
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They’re arb-eligible, so their salaries are starting to become significant. They’re probably still useful pitchers, but there are a lot of mediocre arms available.
by Evan on Oct 11, 2008 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Update: BIG MISTAKE
I had traded him away (along with Dave Roberts) to the Mets in my Baseball Mogul sim and he was an average starter from 24-27. an .831 OPS year mixed in there too. Then he took off and I signed him back as a free agent, and reaped the benifits of a 1.074 OPS and .992 OPS. He’s now 34 and making 24.5 million a year for the next 2 seasons.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 11, 2008 12:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I used him sparingly as a AAAA backup until his year 28 season when I let him be a full-time mlb backup. 400 sub-.700 OPS at bats later, and I let that fool’s contract expire. He’s went on to hit about .275./360/.435 in 400 ABs the next season with Pittsburgh and then Arizona. My verdict: he was useful for a while, and he has a .731 career OPS in over 1000 total ABs. Totally worth keeping around.
I’m currently fighting out my second consecutive NLCS appearance against the Dodgers. After getting up 3 games to 1 on them last year only to lose the next 3 and miss the World series, I’m now up 3 games to 2 on them heading back to LA to finish the series with Lincecum and Clayton Tanner scheduled to pitch the final two games. I feel good about my chances, but after last year’s loss I take nothing for granted.
Also, John Bowker = best leadoff hitter EVER. Mark it.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Oct 11, 2008 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea..
Actually like everyone on the Dodgers has a cheap 7 year contact (Loney, Martin, Ethier, Kemp, Hu) and they’re amazing so the Dodgers are dominating. Kind of sad.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 11, 2008 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowker was very good for me at the top of the lineup. Even though he never hit more than 20 homers in a season, he consistently got his OBP above .350 with a BA hovering around .300.
by Natto on Oct 11, 2008 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowker for me is something like .305/.405/.460 hitting just about 20 HRs a year.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Oct 11, 2008 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowker..
Never turned out for me, traded to the Royals halfway through 2009. He was a backup there until 2012 and he got playing time and hit .716 OPS. Then he went to Chicago and was a backup for two more years, then had 3 straight 20 HR seasons as a starter, still only .305-.310 OBP though as that. He’s currently a backup at 1B again.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 11, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was Rookie of the Year for me in 2011, hitting .302/.384/.470 with 18 homers. I kept him for three more seasons, letting him go as a free agent in 2015 after four very productive seasons. The only reason I let him go was because I had Noonan coming up.
by Natto on Oct 11, 2008 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least Denker doesn't have to worry...
about ever going back to Dodd again now.
http://gregsconnecticutdefenders.blogspot.com
by greg8370 on Oct 11, 2008 1:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I swear to god, I leave town for a day and the Giants screw the pooch. Every time. It never fails.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 11, 2008 2:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously man.
"While conservatives tell you 'leave things alone and no one will lose,' and liberals tell you 'interfere a lot and no one will lose,' baseball says 'someone will lose.' Not only says it - but insists upon it! ... Democracy is lovely, but baseball's more mature." BVCE supports SF Dugout and Manny Burriss.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Oct 11, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now I'll just wait..
For the next trade suggestion including his name as a throw in.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 11, 2008 2:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
denker
good riddance to him. too bad he didn’t end in a cold weather venue.
by thehondohurricane on Oct 11, 2008 2:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I had forgotten about his bitching about Dodd. That was pretty lame.
by Evan on Oct 11, 2008 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Slightly OT, the Blue Angels are strafing SF this afternoon. Can we get them to unload some of their weaponry over Sabean’s office?
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Oct 11, 2008 3:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, I think this is the worst move the Giants made in 2008.
Whipping around guys like Bocock is stupid, but those guys are essentially fungible anyway… they’re not going to be good players. That’s aesthetically disappointing more than anything. Signing guys like Castillo — again, not fun to watch, but no harm done to the future of the franchise.
This is different. This is opting to lose a somewhat interesting talent at one of our very weakest positions. I’m not going to contend Denker’s a future All-Star — he may never be much of anything. But he absolutely has more potential than Velez, Frandsen, Burriss, Ochoa or any of these other clowns we have in the middle infield. He might have filled a hard-to-fill slot for us.
I don’t even care if there was behind-the-scenes stuff that meant we had to lose him. If you don’t want him anymore, wait to trade him, for something. Don’t just put the guy up for grabs.
A stupid, terrible, dispiriting move. Not the way to kick off the offseason.
by onlxn on Oct 11, 2008 4:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
why all the Kevin Frandsen hatred on this board?? Frandsen was a solid minor leaguer, always hitting over .300, and he tore up the AZFL a couple of years ago. Then he comes up here and in about half a season hits a decent .269, and even shows some pop. Despite that, he gets no respect. He is absolutely a better player than Travis Denker will ever be.
Brian Sabean's new dad: Firm believer in corporal punishment
by rxmeister on Oct 11, 2008 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is funny because I’ve seen people complaining about why there is so much Kevin Frandsen love on McC.
by Natto on Oct 11, 2008 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let’s put it this way. Denker’s put up similar minor league numbers to Frandsen, but he’s three years younger than Frandsen! Denker’s always been a little young for his level, whereas Frandsen has usually been old for his.
I don’t hate Frandsen (I think he may be a pleasant surprise in the power department), but I feel like leaning on his minor league numbers overstates the case for him. The other big worry with Frandsen is health. Dude gets hurt a lot. It’s a big part of his game.
I’m all for giving Frandsen the job, but when Velez is Plan B, you shouldn’t just give Plan C to the Padres for nothing.
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
p.s. I disagree with onlxn that Frandsen is a clown and belongs in the same breath as Ochoa, but I do agree that Denker had more potential of the two.
by oldjacket on Oct 11, 2008 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Ochoa is no clown. That low quality 26th MLB player material you are talking about there!
He is like not so great meatloaf. it fills the wholes, its cheap and occasional mouthfuls are sometimes tasty. Were is the respect around here…
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 12, 2008 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t want to think about mouthfuls of Ochoa.
by Natto on Oct 12, 2008 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Threw up a little in your mouth did you?
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 14, 2008 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not saying that Frandsen is as bad as Ochoa. But I think there’s a clear line that can be drawn between Denker and the Frandsen/Burriss/Velez/Ochoa group. If you ask the question, “Is there any genuine reason to believe Player X might be a good major leaguer someday”, the answer is “possibly” for Denker and “no” for the other four. That doesn’t mean one of those four couldn’t become a real player… but objectively, there’s no reason whatsoever to think they will.
Kevin Frandsen is better than Ivan Ochoa. He’s also been old for his level more often than not, has only shown plus skills in hitting for average, the thing that fades the quickest when transitioning to MLB, and — people seem to have missed this in the rush to embrace a young ‘un — was BAD in 2007. He wasn’t the worst player in the league, but he was a solidly below-average player — anything but an asset. He turns 27 early next year.
Denker is a questionable asset… Frandsen is not an asset. There are a number of paths Denker’s career could take from here, but most of them, even many of the disappointing ones, would make him a better player than Kevin Frandsen.
by onlxn on Oct 12, 2008 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denker and Burriss, only two I thought maybe. Denker if he improved his defense, Burriss if he improved his offense. Actually I think that Burriss is the more likely player out of them though.
Frandsen could be a fill-in for a few years at his current level I think, if he improves then a good player. Ochoa is roster filler for MI replacement, and Velez I still haven’t changed my opinion of crap.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 12, 2008 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frandsen
I don’t hate him, but he has no power and doesn’t walk. His offensive profile is extremely limited and probably requires him to hit .320 in the majors to be decent. Guys with no power rarely do this.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually What It Requires Is That He Maintain His High HBP Rate
Kevin seems to prefer to get his free bases the hard way.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
HBPs are no replacement for walks
As an indicator of a good approach at the plate, that is.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Walks Are Not Proof Of A Good Approach At The Plate
Getting good pitches to hit and not swinging at bad pitches is what is reqired. The two are not the same and do not always come hand in hand.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I halfway agree
Merely taking a load of walks is not proof of a good approach, but a good approach does produce a significant number of walks.
I’m also skeptical that a player who goes to the plate trying to get HBP is really making the most out of his at bats. Not getting out of the way is one thing, but adjusting your approach to maximize HBP is another.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Think What He Is Trying To Do
is to take away the inside pitch from the pitcher by making it clear that he is willing to get hit to get a base. Therefore he can focus on hitting pitches that are middle out.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Merely taking a load of walks is not proof of a good approach, but a good approach does produce a significant number of walks.
After Fairweather’s walks piece I am very tempted to say a good BB/K ratio would be more likely indication of plate discipline then number of walks. Anyone see large wholes in that statement?
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 12, 2008 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin Frandsen slugged .379 as a 25-year-old, with an OPS+ of 84. That’s bad. 2007 is a data point against Frandsen, not for him. And the idea that Denker couldn’t put together a middling season like that in 2010, when he’s 25, is ridiculous.
I like Frandsen, and will root hard for him this year. But he shows very little potential — far less than Denker.
by onlxn on Oct 12, 2008 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this move was completely unnecessary. that’s why it is mind boggling. If Denker was a 26 year old career minor leaguer, none of us would care that much, but he’s barely 23 years old and can hit with pop and we just gave him away for nothing.
But it seems the team was never willing to give him a real chance, so there must’ve been something about him they didn’t like. I just hope someone explains the move publicly.
Proud adopted parent of future big league slugger Thomas Neal
by nostocksjustbonds on Oct 11, 2008 5:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they asked Denker to play winter ball and he declined?
by wilriv21 on Oct 11, 2008 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Don't Know That It Was Unnecessary
You All don’t know how many rule 5 draft eligable players the Giants need to protect. You All don’t know who these players are. You All don’t know if many of them are or are not more important to keep the Denker. You All don’t know how many 40 man roster slots the Giants plan to use for free agent signings or players aquired by trade. You don’t know if the Giants tried to trade Denker but found no takers.
Bottom line, this is much to do about nothing because nothing is what you all know.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don’t know shit either. This move, as it currently stands, makes no sense. If something comes to light, that shows why they made this move (and it’s a good reason), I’m sure most here will understand.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But I Am Not The One Over Reacting Before I Know The Facts
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s hardly overreacting. They threw away an asset with value. That is dumb. If you don’t think so, you are wrong.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, You Do Not Know What He Was Thrown Away For
You just assume the answer is nothing because we were not able to trade him. You don’t know what would have been lost (unable to add to 40 Man Roster) if we had keep him. Therefore you are just emotionally reacting without knowing the facts needed to make a rational evaluation of the move.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you the guy who does those Honda in Pleasanton commercials?
by Natto on Oct 11, 2008 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is hogwash, of course we can figure out who needs to be protected
AN has already done it for the A’s. All you have to do is find a top 30 list, figure out who the guys who signed in 2004 (HS/international) and 2005 (college) are, and then see which of them is good enough to be protected.
The Giants pretty much skipped the 2005 draft (Ben Copeland might be sort of worth it). I can’t find a single Rule 5 worthy player from 2004 who isn’t already on the MLB roster either. I’m not sure when Henry Sosa signed, but he might need to be protected.
Maybe someone can scarify up a couple of additional worthies, but I’m sure not seeing them. The vast majority of the top prospects in the Giants system were added in the last two years.
You know what’s really frightening? The number of open roster spots suggests that Sabean is looking to sign a large number of veteran mediocrities.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Oct 12, 2008 2:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True - But Those Bitching Have Not Done This
and they need to do this before they draw any conclusions on the wisdom (or lack there of) of letting Denker go.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 3:00 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh look a Communist Herring! How quaint!
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 12, 2008 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fine, but this is pretty obvious to everyone but you
Current 40 Man:
Matt Cain
Alex Hinshaw
Tim Lincecum
Noah Lowry
Osiris Matos
Pat Misch
Kelvin Pichardo
Sergio Romo
Billy Sadler
Jonathan Sanchez
Jack Taschner
Merkin Valdez
Brian Wilson
Keiichi Yabu
Barry Zito
Steve Holm
Bengie Molina
Pablo Sandoval
Rich Aurilia
Brian Bocock
John Bowker
Emmanuel Burriss
Kevin Frandsen
Conor Gillaspie
Travis Ishikawa
Ryan Rohlinger
Eugenio Velez
Omar Vizquel
Fred Lewis
Dave Roberts
Aaron Rowand
Nate Schierholtz
Randy Winn
That’s 33. From the Top 40 list steve S put together (bold are guys that would need to be protected that aren’t already on the 40 man):
1. LHP Madison Bumgarner
2. RHP Tim Alderson
3. 1B Angel Villalona
4. 3B Conor Gillaspie
5. C Pablo Sandoval
6. RHP Henry Sosa – I don’t think he actually does yet, but let’s count him just in case
7. OF Rafael Rodriguez
8. RF Nate Schierholtz
9. 2B Nick Noonan
10. CF Wendell Fairley
11. 1B Travis Ishikawa
12. LHP Alex Hinshaw
13. 2B Travis Denker – Whoops
14. RHP Merkin Valdez
15. RHP Osiris Matos
16. LHP Clayton Tanner
17. OF Roger Kieschnick
18. RHP Billy Sadler
19. RHP Sergio Romo
20. LHP Ben Snyder
21. RHP Kelvin Pichardo
22. 3B Ryan Rohlinger
23. RHP Joe Martinez
24. LHP Geno Espineli
25. RHP Justin Hedrick
26. SS Brian Bocock
27. LHP Jesse English
28. SS Charlie Culberson
29. 2B Matt Downs
30. CF Michael McBryde
31. RHP Edwin Quirarte
32. LHP Erick Threets
33. RHP Waldis Joaquin
34. RHP Kevin Pucetas
35. LF Brian Horwitz
36. RHP Brian Anderson
37. LF Eddy Martinez-Esteve
38. LHP Paul Oseguera
39. C Jackson Williams
40. RHP Daryl Maday
So, the only guys who would be worth protecting would be Sosa (I don’t think he does need to be though), English, Joaquin, and Anderson. So, that would be at most 37 without Denker (nevermind that Denker is more valuable than 3 of the 4). Further, Aurilia and Vizquel will be coming off the 40 man shortly and I’m not sure what the plan is with Yabu. Richie my be resigned, but Vizquel clearly won’t be. So, what’s your excuse now?
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 12, 2008 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops, I somehow missed two: Martinez and Hedrick. They were 25 and 26 year olds, respectively, in AA this year so they shouldn’t be kept over Denker. Although both are at least marginally interesting.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 12, 2008 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for doing the leg work on this...
But if you’re trying to get Rainman to admit he’s wrong, I wouldn’t waste your time — Never. Gonna. Happen.
If you don’t believe me, check out the sub-thread below where Bhaakon proves him wrong 3 times in 6 comments. Using facts on Rainman is like firing guns at Godzilla — it doesn’t even slow him down.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know. I keep telling myself I’m just going to let this go, but each time I come back here he has written something unbelievably wrong/stupid and I can’t help myself.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 12, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 12, 2008 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As For Free Agents To Sign
I beieve their will be three (two relievers and Rich Aurilia) with an outside shot at a 4th if they decide that CC makes sense and CC likewise decides that the Giants make sense.
I also believe they will trade for two bats (a middle infielder and a corner infielder) to add some power to the lineup. But here the odds are that that they will lose as many 40 man roster players as they will gain so most likely no impact on the number of available or occupied slots.
Finally, I am guessing that they will be filling the remaining slots with players they want to protect from the rule 5 draft. The important question here is: Are the Giants better off keeping these players or would they have been better served losing one of them and keeping Denker? Until we can answer this question this hystaria is flat stupid.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 3:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes and no
The fact is, that’s not a choice that has to be made now. Even if the rule 5 protection eventually justifies the loss of Denker, the fact is that, right now, we don’t know what (specifically, what trades) might happen before the rule 5 draft that could open/take up spaces on the 40-man roster. That’s obviously irrelevant in the cases of Correia, Hennessey, and Walker, where money was the overriding issue, but the decision to let Denker go, correct or not, was unnecessarily hasty.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 3:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It Might Of Been Hasty But
if the Giants have a high degree of confidence that they are going to prefer the other options then perhaps they thought it was also in Denker’s best interest to let him go now.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 3:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If clearing space of "they might be decent then again they might not but they have stuck on MLB rosters for awhile" (like Hennessy, Walker and Corriea ) then logically Mr. Roberts days as a Giant should be very small.
In fact is Roberts a better keeper then Denker? I would say No. Roberts Best case is around 800 innings of MLB ball in ‘08 then he is out from under team control. Denker’s best case was/is much more then that.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 12, 2008 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know what’s really frightening? The number of open roster spots suggests that Sabean is looking to sign a large number of veteran mediocrities.
This scares me as well. I can see our Not An Idiot signing one of the free agent Left fielders then DFA’ing Lewis. The Denker moves does nothing to discourage such thoughts- it only encourages them . Then I alternate and desperately hope that and maybe he will use the rule 5 and a couple reclamation arms for short term bottom of the rotation.
Ivan Ochoa - Heir to the legacy of Rob Andrews & Rikkert Faneyte!
Let's see spread Chaos, Confusion and Anarchy here? Check. My work is complete. I’ll be moving on now.
by daveinexile on Oct 12, 2008 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s not true at all, we can work out how many players we need to protect, in fact someone did that earlier in the year & there wasn’t much at all. If i recall, Sandoval needed protection but he’s already on the 40 man, English would be another i believe, but other than them, there’s Copeland & nothing much else. I mean, if you can list the better prospects than Denker that we needed to protect, then be my guess, but i feel you’ll have trouble making one longer than 1 or 2 players!
I don’t see how signing free agent players makes much difference, they can always release Denker at a later date if they need his roster spot.
Also, you’ve got to consider how much room we would have had anyway, you don’t need to do a detailed, player by player analysis to work out that we don’t need the sheer volume of space we’ve created, at least not until a long time in the future.
Proud owner of the most boring Username! Alex Hinshaw: Now showing in a bullpen near you!
by GiantFan on Oct 12, 2008 3:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Until You Do This Work You Just Don't Know
By making the assumptions you are making you are just putting yourself in the position to be made into what most ASSumers are made into.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 3:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You keep talking about other people’s assumptions or overlooking this Rule 5 issue, but several have pointed out the paucity of numbers when you look at the actual prospects affected: English, Whitaker, Copeland, Threets, EME, Joaquin, Brian Anderson — these are the names. So who are you actually talking about who needed space cleared at the expense of Denker. Name names, Rainman. Other people here have “done the work”.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 12, 2008 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think I would. I love his BB/K rates, but his power has all but disappeared, and he just doesn’t have any non-hitting tools to speak of. It’s hard to see how he’s separated from Brian Horwitz at this point. I certainly wouldn’t choose to protect EME over Denker.
As for the others, IMO:
I’ve always had a soft spot for English, and as a LHP with good K numbers he’s the kind of guy someone might take a Rule 5 chance on, that said he’s Matt Cain’s age and has never been above A ball. If there were an open spot I’d protect him, but i wouldn’t open a spot specifically for him, if it wasn’t filled with some obvious deadwood (Alfonzo, Vizquel).
Whitaker: no freaking way.
Copeland: eh, he’s got some tools and could be a useful 5th OF type and he’s close to the majors. I’d protect him, but I probably wouldn’t choose to protect him over Denker.
Threets: Seems like the org made their decision on Threets last year when they removed him from the 40 man. He’s easy to root for, but leaving him on the Fresno roster seems a perfectly acceptable risk in his case.
Joaquin: Yes, protect him. The org seems to like him, and I’d like to see if he takes a leap with an additional year removed from surgery.
Anderon: Not sure where his health is. Seems perfectly fungible. I’d probably keep him off the 40 man given his missed ’08.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 12, 2008 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
EME
His numbers at Dodd were lacking but his road numbers were nice. His defense has improved and so has his arm strength as he was tested often and came up with his share of OF assists. EME has always been able to hit for average and his shoulder continues to strengthen. Am hoping he can improve like Carlos Quentin did from his injury.
by wilriv21 on Oct 12, 2008 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
While his away power numbers weren’t the abyss of horror that his home numbers were (.277 SLG at Dodd) they weren’t all that impressive. .478 SLG, only 19 XBH (13 of them 2B). His MLEs based only on his road numbers were .274/.336/.405. And again, people who watch him return overwhelming negative opinions of his D, assists aside. I guess if there are open spots laying around that need filling up you could protect him, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to do it. From a Rule 5 prospective, it’s just hard to see his tools playing very well on somebody’s bench in ‘09, so the gamble of exposing him doesn’t seem disprotionate to the risk.
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 12, 2008 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He only had 76 ABs there. His numbers don’t mean anything.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 12, 2008 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you please explain to me why Denker’s 76 AB’s in AA are so much more important to you than his 37 AB’s in the majors?
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or his 220 at AAA?
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or his minor league career totals?
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
or the fact that he’s two years younger?
Get the hell out the way Bengie, Pablito's hit the show!
by Roger on Oct 12, 2008 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
because EME numbers get trashed while Denker should not have been promoted based on his performace
by wilriv21 on Oct 12, 2008 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither should Burriss, or Bocock, or Rohlinger. They didn’t have a say in the matter, are you really going to hold that against them?
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least EME would have earned his promotion and then we could have seen how he performed in the much hitter friendly PCL.
by wilriv21 on Oct 12, 2008 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
But again, Sabean made those calls, not Denker.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
EME has been sucking for a couple years now, and he can’t play defense even adequate for a corner outfielder.
by oldjacket on Oct 12, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because I believe EME would have done better with 37 ML ABs than Denker. Denker did not earn a promotion out of Connecticut. EME performance should have earned him a promotion.
by wilriv21 on Oct 12, 2008 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now I understand
Sabean hates EME, so Denker needs to be sacrificed to the Baseball Gods.
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Promoting without merit can cause dissension within any organization. Hopefully within this organization the players take this as an opportunity to improve and be promoted.
by wilriv21 on Oct 12, 2008 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Karma
Denker was also forced to stay in A ball for three years, even though he definitely earned a promotion. Life sucks.
I actually like EME, and I’m willing to buy that he might be the slightly better hitter of the two, but a good hitter who plays 2B > a slightly better hitter who plays LF. And anyway, I don’t really see the need to compare the two, since we have more than enough room for both of them on the roster.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 12, 2008 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s the work:
Looking at Major league translations, Denker was the best Giants hitter not in the majors at the end of the season.
Most of the worthwhile prospects in the Giants system have been drafted in the last two years.
The end.
by oldjacket on Oct 12, 2008 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope the Giants aren't clearing space
For runs at veteran players. I hope Sabean doesn’t think getting veteran players is the only way to contend in 2009. All he has to do is look at the final four teams and realize that using young players isn’t wrong.
A gamer does NOT wear a foam finger, a dork does.
by SFGuy on Oct 11, 2008 5:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s a bad comp, though. I mean, college basketball teams are always going to be primarily young players.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Oct 11, 2008 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Think He Ment Baseball's Final Four
You know the Dodgers, Phillies, RedSox, and Rays.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Oct 11, 2008 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If It Was A Joke It Was A Bad One
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was an awesome joke
You see, because there’s no final four in baseball parlance.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, I was sloppy on the beat, but the joke itself was funny in my opinion.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on Oct 11, 2008 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
*does that hand moving over head motion*
WOOSH!
by Natto on Oct 11, 2008 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like It Was So Obvious That It Was A Joke.
Sarcasum is very hard to dectect with any consistancy when written as opposed to spoken.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was ridiculously obvious
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 11, 2008 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In all fairness, sarcasum is REALLY hard to detect. I can usually detect sarcasm though.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't sarcasm
It was a play on words.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I posted this in case Natto’s response directly below wasn’t sufficient.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That wasn’t sarcasm, though. It was a play on words.
by Natto on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pretending To Bitch But Actually Trying To Play On Words
Is indeed a form of sarcasm.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How was he bitching?
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"That's A Bad Comp" Sounds Like Bitching To Me
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh, no
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Then Our Perspective Is Just Different Then
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A difference of opinion is not bitching
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 12:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bitching Comes In Different Degrees
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So that would make you a Ph.D.
I’ve only got a BS.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now That Is Funny!
You could be right but I think you are taking your BS skills way to lightly.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 1:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is by far the stupidest argument I’ve ever encountered.
..so allow me to present Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain as two sweet, sweet bottles of warming hooch.
by Cookyman on Oct 12, 2008 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You obviously haven't seen the 'Yabu as proven reliever' argument below.
(“See, Sabean said he was going to get a ‘proven’ reliever, so he went out and got a guy who wasn’t proven, but then that guy later proved himself, and I knew he was going to prove himself, and so did Sabean, so in the end he was actually proven all along — even back before he was proven. How come nobody gets this but me?”)
The Examined Life
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on Oct 12, 2008 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I noticed that too
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, Some Of the Cleared Space Is For Veterans
Sabean has already made it clear he intends to upgrade the bullpen with free agents. The Giants are going to kick the tires of some free agent bats but expect to aquire them by trade not free agency and expect these bats to be at least 2 years away from free agency. The Giants are also going to kick the tires on CC but do not plan on pursuing any other free agent starting pitchers. If you were paying attention to what Sabean has been saying you would already know this.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sabean has said that pretty much every offseason since Nen went down
Bullpen still sucks though.
Either he’s really crappy at picking FA relievers, or it’s Sabeanese for “I’m not telling you WTF I’m doing, so here’s a load of BS.”
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since Benitez and Kline What Free Agent Relievers Are You Talking About?
He has worked of the scrap heap and inhouse since then. He got a little from the scrap heap (Yabu and Walker) but clearly not enough and while Walker was worth the $1.25M combined for 2007 and 2008 he made he will not be worth his likely $1.5M arbitration award if he had been retained. Yabu on the other hand will be re-signed for again about $.5M since he is still not arbitration eligable and he again will be worth it.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am refering to Sabean's rhetoric, not his signings
Every offseason he mentions the bullpen as an area of emphasis. Every offseason, he either does nothing notable, or does something regrettable (as you point out, Benitez and Kline).
So either he’s BSing about focusing on the bullpen, or he’s consistantly trying and failing to address it.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Last Year I Recall No Such Retoric
Last year I recall him talking about trying to build the bullpen inhouse which is what he did. Unfortunately the bullpen he was able to build using just inhouse options failed do to too many homeruns and too many walks from the fear of throwing another gofer ball.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Although the Giants ranked next-to-last in the NL in scoring, Sabean echoed Bochy in saying that these collapses could be attributed more to pitching than hitting: “In some ways, we scored enough runs,” said Sabean, who noted that he’ll try to add at least one proven reliever to the bullpen.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And He Did In Yabu
The rest of his effort was inhouse. This year he has discarded 6 of last year’s inhouse options. Messenger, Chulk, Threets, Walker, Correia, and Hennessey. I think that it is clear that this year he is looking for a true proven 8th inning guy to join his youngsters in getting the ball to Wilson. This year the target is much higher then just a “proven reliever” which they got in Yabu.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yabu was a proven reliever?
Did he prove that with his mediocre stint in Oakland in 2005, or while he was out of the league in 2006 and 2007?
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He Proved It In Japan And Yes He Proved It In Oakland
Proven doesn’t mean great or even above average. Proven just means know and in Yabu’s case that means know to be average or if you prefer mediocre.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
P.S. And He Proved It Again This Year
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Circular logic….fantastic.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 11, 2008 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
PPS
Usually when a GM talks about adding a proven reliever, he isn’t talking about someone signed to a minor league deal.
And yes, the implication is clearly that the reliever is at least average (which you’d be hard-pressed to call a guy who’s been out of the league for 2 years). No one bothers talking about the need for a below average reliever.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He Actually Signed Several To Minor League Deals
and then picked the best in spring training once he had proven himself again.
by giantsrainman on Oct 11, 2008 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not acquiring a "proven reliever:"
That’s sifting through the dregs.
Every team does it every Spring, hence the NRI list. It’s unreasonable to believe that is what Sabean meant by his comments last October. Unless, that is , you’re assuming Sabean was either himself unreasonable or deliberately deceptive.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 11, 2008 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I Think Is
that Sabean intended to go bargin hunting and had confidence that he would find what he wanted at a bargin price. He did. He also found a few useful pieces in house just not enough with is why he is looking to add again this year. But this time he is looking for above average, he is looking for a quality 8th inning guy.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He may have
But saying that you will bring in a proven reliever implies more than Spring training death match between has beens and never weres.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So I Was Right
and you were expecting better the Yabu and thus better then average therefore more the “proven”.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right about what?
I said that you may have been right that Sabean only intended to through the proverbial crap against the wall in Spring training.
I also said that saying you’re going to bring in a “proven reliever” implies alot more than the annual ritual of pity NRIs and minor league deals.
Hence my original point: Sabes SAID one thing and MEANT another. Therefore, I am correct. Here’s the relevant portion of my original comment:
So either he’s BSing about focusing on the bullpen, or he’s consistantly trying and failing to address it.
So you have excerted a great deal of evidence to support my first assertion: He’s blowing air up our asses in every interview, and his words are not to be taken at face value.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Do Understand You Point Of View
I just disagree. What you expected as a “proven reliever” isn’t what I think Sabean intended or what I expected.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So that word “proven” means something other than “proven.”
Good to know.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 12:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
It just doesn’t mean proven to be above average.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Technically, it only “means” an established level of performance, with no indication of what that level is. However. It connotes an established above average level of performance.
After all, why would the GM make a point of mentioning his plan to add a below average reliever? For the same reason that Chewbacca lives on Endor.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 1:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We Partially Agree
except I see Yabu as average (not below) and did so when the Giants first signed him. The fact that he did not play MLB either here or in Japan in 2006 or 2007 for me did not make him less so. It just ment the Giants needed to see for themselves that he was still the same pitcher. They did.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 1:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh?
No offense, but expecting a 39 year old who hasn’t played in the majors for two seasons to be the same or better than he was 3 years ago is pretty insane.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 1:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But I Was Right
and so was Sabean.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 1:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sabean was so sure that he gave Yabu a major league contract right off the bat.
wait a minute…
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Oct 12, 2008 2:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Offer More?
More wasn’t needed. That would just be bad business.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do realize this is the same argument we’re using with Denker right now? Why cut him now if it wasn’t needed? That’s bad business.
You’ve taken an untenable position, and instead of just admitting that you were wrong after being beaten over the head with logical arguments, you’ve decided to dig in.
Neglectful father of David Quinowski
by marcello on Oct 12, 2008 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damm - What Is Happening To My "N"s?
Both the “the” before “Yabu” and the “the” before “proven” were supose to be "then"s.
by giantsrainman on Oct 12, 2008 12:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK
Now I remember. To look at this from Sabean’s eyes – Denker doesn’t really have good miL numbers, because of all the walks. Remember, he only looks at BA/HR/RBI.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN
by zenbitz on Oct 11, 2008 8:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yea dont' worry..
Grant did announce it anyways.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 12, 2008 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
After a few days..
Now I expect Sabean to add 3-4 free agents to the roster, none large, bullpen help, 3B, infield, maybe a starter. Then, try and add several through the rule 5 draft.
The Basil Fawlty Moderating Strategy:
"We could run a nice blog here if we didn't have all these members getting in the way."
Giant Whiteout I wouldn't go there if I were you.
by WalrusMan on Oct 12, 2008 6:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Someone here
should print out this entire 400-post thread and send a copy to Denker, just to let him know that we cared about him, even if Sabean didn’t.
No, my Crazy Crab bobblehead is not for sale.
by Kitspool on Oct 12, 2008 7:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We should also explain who rainman is, so he doesn’t get too discouraged by those posts.
Trent Kline: Decentish. Also, my website is called ChatterBalks Dot Com. It's not being updated right now. Hope for more at your own risk.
by groug on Oct 12, 2008 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oldjacket’s bus just crashed :(
#1 JUDY STEFFES FAN
My favorite pie is (name of pie flavor)
Bay City Ball
by xanthan on Oct 13, 2008 11:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















