Tradin': Matt Morris
Matt Morris is an average pitcher. I don't have any delusions that he really is the missing piece to some championship puzzle and that the Giants should be compensated accordingly. In a just world, the Giants wouldn't expect a bounty for an average pitcher who was owed $9M for the following season.
But consider the pitchers who are coming up in trade rumors:
Kyle Lohse
Jose Contreras
Shawn Chacon
Joe Kennedy
Morris's contract should actually help his value. The free-agent market for starting pitchers is Carlos Zambrano and the usual mish-mash of soon-to-be-overpaid mediocrity and sub-mediocrity. Teams with a possible opening in the 2008 rotation can look at Morris as someone who can help prevent them from spending $30M on Kyle Lohse or $50M on Jason Jennings. Nine million and one year for Morris or $8M and four years for Livan Hernandez?
The number of possible suitors is also in the Giants' favor. There are 13 teams within five games of a playoff spot, and just about every one of them need a starter. Boston is still starting Julian Tavarez. The Tigers have an offensive beast of a team, but Mike Maroth is still going out every fifth day. Every starter past the Mariners' top three has been abysmal. Only the Cubs are currently getting production from all five slots in their rotation.
That's about 300 words to get to this point: It isn't unreasonable to hope the Giants are able to trade Morris for a player who will be starting for them in 2008. I still have my Asdrubal Cabrera hopes. He's a defensively gifted shortstop who's hitting in the Eastern League. He's walking more than he's striking out, stealing bases, and he's hitting for a little power. He's only 21 and he's blocked in the Indians organization by Jhonny Peralta. Want.
The problem is that the Indians are a smart organization. They might want Matt Morris, but not enough to give up a top young player. That description also fits with the Braves, Red Sox, Tigers, Padres, and Diamondbacks. What the Giants need is a team that's contending, but also run by a GM of questionable competence. A GM who has made curious move after curious move, attends the Church of the Veteran every week, and has young players the Giants could use....
Here. The Mariners are three games back of the Angels, and I'm not quite sure how. If you go by runs scored/runs allowed, they aren't that much better than the Giants; the offense is a bit better, the starting rotation a bit worse. And though it's a little presumptuous for some dink like me to call a GM incompetent, Bavasi certainly doesn't have the confidence of the Mariner bloggers. In fact, here is the U.S.S. Mariner explicitly asking Bavasi not to trade for Matt Morris. Don't listen to their lies, Bill! Look at the sparkly ERA! Sparkly sparkly!
Point is, I'd love to take Wladimir Balentien off the Mariners' hands. They already have Ichiro. They can keep their prize prospect, Adam Jones. Everyone wins. Except the Mariners. But that's not the point.
Comment starter: With the help of Brute Sentiment's thorough diary, try and come up with your own Matt Morris pipe dreams. I really do think he's going to Seattle, though it's probably not realistic to hope for Balentien or Jeff Clement. A fella can dream, though....
0 recs |
81 comments
Comments
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Or are we not doing that anymore =(
by sam urai on Jul 17, 2007 1:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I like that quote. This deadline is bringing me back to the idea Sabean tried to sell us in the past...the price of doing business. It certainly isn't unreasonable to demand an average starting caliber player back for our average starting caliber player. A player maybe not quite ready for the bigs should project better than average. As for my trade idea:
Morris + Winn(or Durham if they prefer, or any other vet really) to Mets for Carlos Gomez and another body. They do have Milledge and yet another stud OF(Martinez?) on the way in a couple years. NYM have scouted Winn and Minaya is on record saying he wont trade Milledge/Gomez for rentals. Well, here you go Omar, two non-rentals.
Gomez looks potentially like a faster Alex Rios, which is scary. Potential being the key word. Giving up known quantities for potential is a dangerous game, so the prospect we get should be as good or better than anyone we've given up since the Schmidt trade--since Morris is better than anyone we've acquired at the deadline recently. And we have moved some pretty valuable prospects. BTW, who was Pirates GM in 2001. And who is he working for--we should call them first.
by Birdman on Jul 17, 2007 2:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Pirates GM in 2001 is Littlefield and he's still there. There has been speculation here for a while that he won't deal with Sabean anymore after that trade.
FYI, Winn has a no-trade clause. However, Durham would be a great addition to the deal, they have Valentin playing 2B there.
I only know this much about the Mets and Gomez because I almost got Gomez (sob...) for Marcus Giles in a league I'm in but blew it....
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 17, 2007 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Milledge, Gomez, Martinez . . . the Mets may have so many outfield prospects that they may start undervaluing them. They can't all play, after all. I'd be happy with any of those guys.
by Evan on Jul 17, 2007 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, try again
by awesomer on Jul 17, 2007 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Eh, try again
by Anticon23 on Jul 17, 2007 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Eh, try again
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jul 17, 2007 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Birdman on Jul 17, 2007 2:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Clement...
by kenshin1 on Jul 17, 2007 2:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I forgot to include my main point.....
by kenshin1 on Jul 17, 2007 2:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
"Everyone wins. Except the Mariners. But that's not the point."
That's a full out belly laugh. :)
by Armz Dealer on Jul 17, 2007 2:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Thompson on Jul 17, 2007 6:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Lyle on Jul 17, 2007 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
As I posted in the previous thread, seems to me that the Giants can go to ways...the first would be to rebuild methodically by dealing Morris and other vets for the second rate prospects and low ceiling major league talent they would likely bring back, and wait for the draft to bear fruit in '10 and beyond...
Or take a higher risk faster approach. Deal Cain or Lincecum for young major league ready talent with controlable contracts at multiple positions. If Sabean could leverage either Cain or Lincecum into a significant upgrade at at least 2 positions for the foreseable future, that should be considered.
by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 6:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Its just too much of a coincidence not to be right.
by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Tajiri on Jul 17, 2007 6:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 7:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
We all know how that one worked out.
There is no need to continue to trade away our young core players, especially since we wont get anything even remotely close in value to the unbridled potential of Lincecum and Cain. The only players I'd even consider would be someone like Utley or Cabrera, and that aint happening.
Like it or not, this team will have us banging our heads against a table for a few years to come, but it will at least seem manageable with Cain and Lincecum pwning batters. Lets stick with the Schierholtzes and Ortmiers and Lewises for a bit, we've got nothing to lose now.
by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Evan on Jul 17, 2007 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
As a hypothetical, the Phillies need pitching and are built to win now. Cain packaged with either Durham/Klesko/Aurillia/Wynn for 2 of the following 3 Howard/Utley/Victorino ? Maybe that it is fanciful speculation, but that is the kind of return that would be neccessary to consider dealing Cain or Lincecum.
by TLF on Jul 17, 2007 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Magowan and Behr have much more money to burn than they lead on, they just dont want you knowing it. They wont let Cain get away.
by AngelintheInfield on Jul 17, 2007 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Let's not go throwing away our best pitchers to grab ourselves some hitters who might not hit when they arrive at AT&T Park. And Ryan Howard's a lefty hitter who's currently batting .250 on the season. Lefty hitter + McCovey Cove typically = loss of power and decline in BA. Not saying it WILL happen to Howard, I'm just saying Matt Cain MIGHT still be more valuable to the Giants in the long run.
by JRPhillips on Jul 17, 2007 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by BondsApologist on Jul 17, 2007 7:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 8:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by mjrboredom on Jul 17, 2007 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by someguynamedg on Jul 17, 2007 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
That movie has many memorable quotes.
by mxmob33 on Jul 17, 2007 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Lyle on Jul 17, 2007 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Lyle on Jul 17, 2007 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I don't know if there's a fit, but damned if you didn't just describe Ned Coletti to a T.
by Pants Man on Jul 17, 2007 7:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Kitspool on Jul 17, 2007 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
If the Giants really want to get a much better prospect, they really ought to be thinking about dealing Noah Lowry. He's young, left-handed and signed to a reasonable contract for a few more years. That's the guy they should cash in and do it now before he blows up also.
by oldrips on Jul 17, 2007 8:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by zenbitz on Jul 17, 2007 9:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by leewhee on Jul 17, 2007 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
So what Correia's value about now? How about selling him as the next Accardo - before that ERA reaches 6.00.
by RUSirius on Jul 17, 2007 9:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by RUSirius on Jul 17, 2007 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
So there's no way you give up a guy who has the ability to keep you in just about every game he pitches.
The problem, of course, is run production. This year, the Giants have scored 3 runs or fewer in 44 of 90 games (regulation 9 inn.)
So in half the games, the Giants pitching staff would have to give up 2 or fewer runs per 9 innings in order to win. That means the staff would need to post an ERA under 2.00 to win any of half the games.
The Giants run total this year doesn't look as anemic as it really is, thanks to a few blowout wins (13-0, etc). But when you look at the median # of runs per game, it's pathetic.
I say keep the arms and work on trying to find a group that can at least scratch out 4 runs a game one way or the other.
by leewhee on Jul 17, 2007 9:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn Delusional Yankees
Well, I do. He's almost a five-tool player. And we have amillion Venezuelans on our team, so he should be thrilled at joining his countrymen on the Gyros.
I think the Yankees would take the bait, too. Both Henny and Morris are better starters than most of their staff. The Yankees are also delusional and think they have a chance at making a play-off push. Landing Abreu is my pipe dream... but I have been holding on to itmuch too long for it to become a reality.
by milesntrane on Jul 17, 2007 9:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
by Evan on Jul 17, 2007 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
Gee, an aging player with declining skills......just the type of guy that Sabean loves. What I don't get is why hasn't Sabean brought in Julio Franco yet?
by oldrips on Jul 17, 2007 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Damn Delusional Yankees
by someguynamedg on Jul 17, 2007 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kendall and Beane
by Dutchfury on Jul 17, 2007 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Jul 17, 2007 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by out machine on Jul 17, 2007 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by giants92388 on Jul 17, 2007 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by delorean on Jul 17, 2007 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by SabeanSupporter on Jul 17, 2007 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by oldrips on Jul 17, 2007 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kendall and Beane
by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Talking about the winter
Believe in the last CBA there were changes made to add an additional year before prospects had to be protected but was wondering what SF prospects needed to be considered for protection or otherwise exposed to the Rule 5 draft.
by wilriv21 on Jul 17, 2007 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Talking about the winter
The Giants biggest problem isn't protecting its good, young prospects, it's developing them in the first place.
by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
The Giants aren't going to get anything of worth for their players. The trade market seems to have change dramatically in the last few years. It seems that teams just want to hold on to their better prospects. After last years spending spree, you can't blame them. Teams simply cannot do business paying average to above average players the kind of money that was being thrown around. That Marlins owner knew that, and that's why he flipped out over the Ichiro deal. Didn't we already go through this with the A-rod contract in Texas? And the Mike Hampton contract in Colorado? And now the Zito contract? Ugh.
The only way out of this mess is to start drafting legitimate talent. If they can't get legitimate prospects for Morris (and I don't think they can) I would just keep him. I don't expect the true rebuilding to start until Sabean is gone.
by smedley on Jul 17, 2007 1:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
But is the trading of Kendall a rebuild?
by wilriv21 on Jul 17, 2007 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
But this move almost definitely makes the A's a better team as of today, so I don't think it's a rebuild move. The fact that it is good for the future is just a plus for them.
by howtheyscored on Jul 17, 2007 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by Dutchfury on Jul 17, 2007 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by out machine on Jul 17, 2007 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
Re-building often entails more than one move. Like howtheyscored, I don't think this is really a rebuilding move.
by sfgfan on Jul 17, 2007 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
by out machine on Jul 17, 2007 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see Kendall's defense hyped so much
by awesomer on Jul 17, 2007 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I see Kendall's defense hyped so much
by delorean on Jul 18, 2007 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tradin': Matt Morris
I DO think Brian will change his ways though. With the drafting of Lincecum, the signing of Villanova and having six of the first 51 draft picks this year, he already HAS.
by sharksrog on Jul 18, 2007 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
My client is available...
by Glenallen Hill's Helmet on Jul 17, 2007 3:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Sterling silver Necklace Tiffany Dreams
by jponry on Jul 18, 2007 12:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Sterling silver Necklace Tiffany Dreams
I mean, seriously, how hard is it to scam some half decent college grammar geek into editing your spambot messages under what you liberally call an "internship."
Can't be that hard.
by howtheyscored on Jul 18, 2007 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Sterling silver Necklace Tiffany Dreams
by Natto on Jul 18, 2007 1:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
It's okay if you don't get that reference and you think I'm weird. I think I'm weird too.
by groug on Jul 18, 2007 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
by Roger on Jul 18, 2007 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
by groug on Jul 18, 2007 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I pretty much missed some spambot stuff
by Roger on Jul 18, 2007 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















