Morris!

His stuff didn't look that much better than usual. The control did, however, and that was the difference. If Morris can keep the control going, he could enjoy a Woody Williams/David Wells-kind of late-career surge.
I still have Morris-for-Abreu fantasies, though. It might not be realistic yet, but if Morris's ERA stays under 4.00, it would be the Yankees that would have to kick in a prospect.
Also, in those trade fantasies, Dave Roberts plays third when he comes off the DL. And he's put on 40 pounds. And he becomes a 30/30 player. If you don't like it, get your own roster fantasies.
95 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Why trade Winn, especially if you aren't going to get prospects? That leaves us with Roberts (healthy? no?), Ortmeier, Lewis, and possibly Schierholtz in the non-Bonds division of the OF. I don't think so. Besides, Winn has a really cheap contract and can actually play CF unlike Abreu.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 20, 2007 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
I love what he's doing right now, but we have no reason to think it can last, and even less to think that he'll come anywhere near approaching his value for the next two years.
That said, trading Winn is really only possible if we become sellers.
Sabean is more likely to become Peter Sellers.
Re: Morris!
Given Pierre and Matthews both got $9M/yr and $10M/yr, respectively, I'd take Randy Winn over either of them. Maybe I'm alone in this?
Re: Morris!
I'm not saying Randy Winn is some major league superstar, or even a really above average player. He's slightly above average (at his best) and has a decent skillset. In free agency, he probably could yield the same (if not more than) either of those two guys I mentioned.
In an ideal world, of course you'd have a steady stream of players coming up and replacing the ones that have left after their arbitration years. But that just doesn't happen. At least not on a regular basis (unless you're the A's).
Everyone was clamoring for Linden this year, and we all saw where that went. Lewis is hitting like the late 2005 Randy Winn so far, but will that hold? Ortmeier is showing he could be a 4th outfielder right now, but will that hold? Linden looked good late last year too, and we all know how that went.
Just like any other sport, free agency will play a role in building (and maintaining) a team. Because of this, any player on the older side of their arbitration years will yield more money. Randy Winn does will make $8M/yr for the next two years, but that is really cheap if he could just maintain his career numbers.
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
I've noted it in the BS Review thread (most recent one) that if I'm going to be paying a lot for an outfielder, I may as well go for the gold and pull in someone useful. Guys like Andruw Jones and Ichiro will yield probably 18 to 22 million per annum this coming offseason, but thats more worth it than paying 10 to 12 million (which will probably be the going rate for average outfielders). That is, unless your team already has guys like Andruw Jones and Ichiro, which the Giants don't.
If I were to do it again, I wouldn't have extended Winn, not for that much. I would have tried to keep the per annum values at around 4 to 6 million. But he would have walked, and thats okay.
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
B) Winn's contract is hardly cheap considering his production
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on May 21, 2007 5:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
by nostocksjustbonds on May 20, 2007 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by Mordy From Monsey on May 21, 2007 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
by awesomer @ McCovey Chronicles on May 20, 2007 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Equivalencies
Re: Equivalencies
by nostocksjustbonds on May 20, 2007 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
But, I have been shown my wayward ways. It seems, despite the 5-1 W-L record, the sub 3 ERA, that Morris is really a bum. Something about Peripheraries. See, Grant, you don't have to watch the games, you just look in a book somewhere and if the Peripheraries (no not the island chain) are in decline then the guy is a bum. There is an important corallary: If the pitcher is one signed by Sabean, and the Feriperals are in declination, it is proof not only that the declintion hurler is a bum, but proof positive that Sabean is, always has been, and always will be a bum.
It's been a painful lesson, Grant, just hope I can save you some heartache. But, you need to know, there is evidently some sort of religious experience you have to undergo in order to be worthy of the sacred knowledge, something akin to receiving the tablets (or is it Tablets) from, or in place of, Moses. Good luck, Grant. Hope you don't catch too much derision for your uninformed post.
Re: Morris!
The point isn't that anyone has been saying "Morris is a bum." The point is that some of us feel like his performance isn't sustainable if he continued to walk and strikeout batters at the rate he was (in a basically 1:1 ratio). It's not that anyone's saying he's sucked so far. It's just a concern for his future starts.
Today, he had an excellent start that included a 9:2 K/BB ratio. A start like that is what I've been wanting to see from Morris and I really hope he can build on this start and just get better and better.
Re: Morris!
But, I have been shown my wayward ways. It seems, despite the 5-3 W-L record, the sub 4 ERA, that Wright is really a bum. Something about Peripheraries. See, Grant, you don't have to watch the games, you just look in a book somewhere and if the Peripheraries (no not the island chain) are in decline then the guy is a bum. There is an important corallary: If the pitcher is one signed by Sabean, and the Feriperals are in declination, it is proof not only that the declintion hurler is a bum, but proof positive that Sabean is, always has been, and always will be a bum.
It's been a painful lesson, allfrank, just hope I can save you some heartache. But, you need to know, there is evidently some sort of religious experience you have to undergo in order to be worthy of the sacred knowledge, something akin to receiving the tablets (or is it Tablets) from, or in place of, Moses. Good luck, allfrank. Hope you don't catch too much derision for your uninformed post.
I'm not saying that Wright = Morris, but making fun of strikeouts and walks as an indicator of a pitcher's performance is like making fun of people who carry umbrellas on overcast days.
by Grant Brisbee on May 20, 2007 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 20, 2007 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
But really? You have just retreated into the last gasp position of the statbasher. No, allfrank. We don't watch the games. Those are truly boring. What we like are spreadsheets, stat books, calculators, slide rules... you know, anything but watching the games.
Do you know how retarded that sounds? Do you think the saber-friendly fans here don't watch the games? That we wait until it is over and then pore over the stats and then post here? You have got to be kidding me. I have not known any sabermetric fans who don't watch games. In fact, we are fans. Fanatics, even, who watch tons and tons of games. I have mlb.tv so I can watch the Giants. I also watch tons of other games. I will have the Giants game on my computer and the White Sox or Cubs or Braves on TV. I watch the Tigers on mlb.tv a lot. Suggesting that we don't watch the games is ridiculous. People like Jake and I are on gameday threads - while watching the game - pretty much every day.
So get your head out of your ass with the lame insults. It's pathetic.
About peripherals: How are you going to decide who is good? After watching the game? Yeah, Morris was good today (with good peripherals, I should add). Was he good because he got the win? Was he good because he had a good ERA? Was he good last year with his 4.98 ERA?
How do you know who will be good next game? Next week? Next month? Tell us. Give us your rundown on who will be good. Let us know how a hit-lucky pitcher will be able to keep that up. Give us examples of effective pitchers who walk as many as they strike out. Give us meaningful sample sizes and not one game or one month as "evidence."
I am always open to good arguments, but I will rip bad ones to shreds. So go again. Convince me.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 20, 2007 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
by Mordy From Monsey on May 21, 2007 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
I would say he is an above average #3 SP, and we have him at a below market value price. I don't think Sabean gets particularly praised or criticized for this move; it is a positive move, as it brings a guy with a real competitive attitude and above average skills to the team, for a below average price. He benefits the team not only by taking the ball every 5th day, giving us a chance to win, but also in his effect on other pitchers on the team (of which we have many).
So, it is possible he declines this year? Sure, but that is true of any player. Is it more likely because of his strike out rate? Well, it bears consideration, but no more than the fact he pitched much of last year with a serious injury. I personally think he is more likely to be better this year than last; and I think assessment of his stats has to fold in an assessment of the impact of the injury on last year's numbers. In otherwords, I don't think, in Morris' case, stats, even putative predictive ones are particularly relevant. I poke fun becasue the stats are quoted in such solemn seriousness - and yet not a one of us has had the benefit of talking to him, watching his ST routine, or getting any sort of scouting report.
In Other News...

Re: In Other News...
by nostocksjustbonds on May 20, 2007 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Analysis of Mrs. Klesko...
Non statheads: She's beautiful.
by Lyle @ McCovey Chronicles on May 21, 2007 5:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Analysis of Mrs. Klesko...
Hm.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 21, 2007 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions
This gent enjoys the pencil test
Re: This gent enjoys the pencil test
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 21, 2007 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: In Other News...
by Mordy From Monsey on May 21, 2007 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Does he still have said wife?
by EliminateMe on May 21, 2007 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Does he still have said wife?
Re: In Other News...
But then I saw him oogling the future Mrs. Goofus and said, "Screw it!"
Re: In Other News...
Re: In Other News...
But how far is too far? That, I don't know.
by howtheyscored on May 21, 2007 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
On topic, I'd trade Morris for a bat, but not Abreu. My baseball fantasy still involves Andruw Jones - and no strip clubs are included. Now, if the Braves would just collapse.
Re: Morris!
by victor frankenstein on May 20, 2007 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 20, 2007 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Oh yeah, have I mentioned lately that Matt Morris threw a ball to me and my son in spring training?
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Would he hit better if it were centered?
by victor frankenstein on May 20, 2007 4:56 PM PDT reply actions
Keeps pitching like this and the expense
Re: Morris!
by K on May 20, 2007 6:17 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
His LOB% was quite low though at 65.1%, and since he doesn't strike out guys a lot this probably played a part in it. This has been decreasing though for 5 years so while some of it can be attributed to luck some of it is probably his decline as well.
His HR/FB% was actually quite low at 9.5%, some of that can be attributed to the park but I think it'll come back up soon, especially since its at 7.9% now.
by awesomer @ McCovey Chronicles on May 20, 2007 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by awesomer @ McCovey Chronicles on May 20, 2007 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
the rest of it, i agree with
by Mike @ McCovey Chronicles on May 20, 2007 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 20, 2007 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by whataboutbob on May 21, 2007 12:21 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Morris!
by Punch Rockgroin on May 21, 2007 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 21, 2007 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
64 innings; 5-3; 2.67 ERA; and even had a nice little 44:18 K-to-Walk ratio. Matt Morris: Extreme mediocrity, punctuated by short bursts of goodness/luck. Like most the rest of average major leaguers.
If we can ditch his contract, which nine starts ago I think we all agreed was a trainwreck, great. If we can get anybody back for him, I won't argue with it.
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
I suppose there's a chance that Morris could become consistent with his command and pitch all the time the way he does in his good stretches, but I'd much rather take the chance that Bobby Abreu can return to form.
Re: Morris!
A good hitter like Abreu would probably be better for this team at the moment, considering the depth of the rotation and the lackluster hitting, but Morris is still a very valuable pitcher. I thought "extreme mediocrity" was an overly harsh description in the earlier post.
Re: Morris!
There are different forms of FIP, but basically it's calculated by using the pitcher's actual K, BB, and HR rates but applying a league-average hit rate, and then figuring out how many runs such a pitcher could be expected to give up on average.
Extreme mediocrity
As for his contract not being a trainwreck in light of Zito's deal -- Zito's deal is a trainwreck. So, there's that.
Hey, it's not that I don't like Morris. I'm strangely sanguine when he starts. But the guy is a lot more likely to lose value the more he starts, and his contract alone makes him trade bait in my mind.
by lyricalkiller on May 21, 2007 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Extreme mediocrity
by howtheyscored on May 21, 2007 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
As for Morris we aren't sure what his super power is.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 21, 2007 9:39 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Morris!
by howtheyscored on May 21, 2007 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
What I like about Morris is that he really HATES to lose. Not just when he's pitching either. We just need to hypnotize him every start into thinking that he needs to stop a 3-game losing streak.
That, and I think he knows he is about 4 on the SP depth chart, and that drives him
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Any idea
Re: Any idea
Re: Any idea

Re: Any idea
by howtheyscored on May 21, 2007 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
by bigshowbaseball on May 21, 2007 12:29 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
by bigshowbaseball on May 21, 2007 3:17 PM PDT reply actions
Of course there have been without either
by awesomer @ McCovey Chronicles on May 21, 2007 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Morris!
Re: Morris!
Most of the 2007 Giants pitching staff is a testament to that.
I do agree that FIP is definitely not a good measurement of pitching performance. It is, however, a somewhat capable "overview" provider for a large number of pitchers in history.
Re: Morris!
Looking at Morris game histories, he has been very consistent. He gives up about a hit an inning. Where he has been effective is in getting the first hitter out and, often the second hitter. Many of his hits and/or walks, thus, have come with two outs. Next, he has avoided the big inning. Of his 61 IP, he has given up more than 1 run only 4 times. In St. Lo, in one of the few times he let the first two hitters on (1b, BB) it was followed up by an error, scoring 1 run and putting runner on 2d and 3d, 0 outs. The next 2 outs scored runs, but he gave up a 2 run jack to Puhols. This is the only really stressful inning he has had. The other tree were each 2 run innings (altho he had 2 two run innings in his loss in Az). I think this shows a certain amount of steadiness and pitching skill. He doesn't panic with runners on, doesn't start nibbling and walking guys. He continues to pitch the same - and, I think, thereby gives up a run but avoids a big inning. In other words, despite his loss of velocity, he has learned to pitch, and he keeps his nerves calm so he can continue ton produce and continue to throw quality pitches. Wouldn't we love to see J Sanchez learn that?

by 





















