Anarchy
Yesterday's post was my How I Stopped Worrying, and Learned to Give Up on Todd Linden post. It was torture watching him fall behind in every at-bat, but who really thought the team was going to expose him to waivers? If Roberts were injured, the Giants would only need to call up one additional outfielder. The real decision - Lewis or Linden? - would only have to be made when Roberts came off the DL.
Instead, the Giants weighed two options - stick with Todd Linden, or audition Dan Ortmeier for a month even if it meant losing Linden to waivers - and they chose the latter. That's a bold, bold vote of no-confidence for Linden. Ortmeier is a career .272/.350/.434 hitter in the minors, and he hit .244/.293/.389 last season in AAA. He was hitting .268/.341/.482 in AAA at the time of his call-up. Linden wasn't the answer. But Ortmeier really isn't the answer.
This isn't a lamentation for Lindens gone by. He's likely gone, and the odds of him ever becoming a major league hitter were awful, at least with the Giants. Maybe another organization can straighten him out. All I know is if I were a struggling young hitter, I would want to get as far away from the Giants as I possibly could. This team produces good hitters at the same rate other teams produce good jazz albums.
So another first-round (supplemental) pick down the tubes. Let's revisit the list of Best Position Players Drafted or Developed since Matt Williams (1986 Draft):
C - Doug Mirabelli
1B - Damon Minor
2B - Deivi Cruz
SS - Royce Clayton
3B - Bill Mueller
LF - Marvin Benard
CF - Chris Singleton
RF - Armando Rios
I was hopeful that Linden eventually would replace Rios. No dice. Can Kevin Frandsen pass up Deivi Cruz? Godspeed, ex-Spartan. Godspeed.
What amazes me is that the past 20 years of development futility haven't been orchestrated by the same group. The keys have been given to a couple of general managers, a bunch of player development types, and scores of minor league instructors and managers. Not one of them could come up with something better than Bill Mueller.
Even with six picks of the first 51 in this year's draft, they'll turn every promising position player into a busted player. They might as well draft six pitchers and try and trade them for talent from other teams.
Bah.
Go Fred Lewis. Ascend higher than the lofty peaks climbed by Marvin Bernard and Chris Singleton! Excelsior!
Open grumpy thread.
0 recs |
107 comments
Comments
Re: Anarchy
by David Arnott on May 11, 2007 11:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Grant on May 11, 2007 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by David Arnott on May 11, 2007 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by David Arnott on May 11, 2007 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
As far as range factor and zone rating, I'd rather look at Clayton's high Galaga score to interpret his defense. BP has him as consistently above-average from 94-03, not that I'm enamored of BP's numbers, but I trust them more than RF and ZR.
Add in Clayton's speed and the uncertainty of how Pedro would perform at SS for a decade-long span, and I feel comfortable choosing Clayton. Of course, this is like choosing a kick in the taint over a punch in the kidney.
by Grant on May 12, 2007 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Josh from Hollywood on May 12, 2007 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by howtheyscored on May 13, 2007 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Rude thoughtless little pig on May 11, 2007 11:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Roger on May 11, 2007 11:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by jponry on May 11, 2007 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
And I'm still angry we traded Mike Caruso.
by Lyle on May 11, 2007 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Rude thoughtless little pig on May 11, 2007 11:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Todd Linden on May 12, 2007 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by ben p on May 11, 2007 11:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by jponry on May 11, 2007 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by jponry on May 11, 2007 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball panik in the year 7
Well and Omar may be finished offensively, Roberts is out of commission and we may have seen the last of Joel Zumaya's 103. I still miss Tomko. The Rockies are dominant, Arizona is scary and we can't get it to work with either the kids or the ancient ones or a mix of both. Randy Winn cannot steal a base. Matty Mo is going to come back to earth sometime. Russ Ortiz is on the DL with a fake injury. Correiassey is awfully inconsistent as are Sanchez, Capt. Jack and even Mando when he doesn't get the right calls from the umpires.
HAVE I MENTIONED THE UMPIRES?
I'm trying to think of reasons to listen to the Giants now instead of putting on some Goo Goo Dolls every night and moping around in an offseasoneque haze of ennui. What's the point, we're just going to lose in the late innings. Barry will get walked. My Notgardo can't pick off a runner to save his precious life, and I'm afraid he's next on the chopping block while Bochy decides to give someone else a chance. Klesko and Sweeney are underwhelming me. I'm afraid Frandsy is just going to be another NiekroLindenWhateverWhoever. Accardo's closing in Toronto and Chulk seems to have lost whatever he had last year. I'd rather have Gil Meche than Barry Zito. I can't name a single Brewer and yet they're tearing up the entire MLB so the hell with that.
To quote the Baron, vaya con dios, Magellan. End rant.
by tk on May 11, 2007 11:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said
by hairball on May 11, 2007 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Well said
by Goofus on May 11, 2007 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball panik in the year 7
I kid. Thanks for saying all the things I would say if I was provoked. Today I am trying to be zen because if not my forehead veins will pop and it's really hard to clean blood off cubicle walls. You pick up my slack. You rage when I cannot, and when I stomp and rage and yell you're there to be all calm and stuff.
You complete me.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 11, 2007 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball panik in the year 7
You have first rights on Lincecum, all rights reserved, may not be reproduced, rebroadcast, or rewritten without express permission of BaronVonCurrentEvents and Major League Fake Baseball.
by tk on May 11, 2007 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball panik in the year 7
by Lyle on May 11, 2007 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball panik in the year 7
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Baseball panik in the year 7
hope that wasnt a serious comment...the dude was k'ining almost half the time he was coming to bat...do you honestly think that would improve?
by bacci40 on May 12, 2007 1:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by BondsApologist on May 11, 2007 11:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
There was slim pickings last year in position players. Even the guy picked ahead of Lincecum, Drew Stubbs has question marks about his chances of hitting well in the majors. Only Evan Longoria was a can't miss position pick. Rowell was picked before and is nice but very young.
Snider, Marrero and Rowell would have been nice, but as high schoolers, it would be years before they contribute anything.
I don't know how loaded prospect-wise, the position players are, but I hope Sabean just picks the best players available, regardless of what position the player plays.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 11, 2007 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by BondsApologist on May 11, 2007 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by BondsApologist on May 11, 2007 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by MeSoKrabby on May 11, 2007 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by BondsApologist on May 11, 2007 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Am I going to get booed off the stage for not being pessimistic?
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 11, 2007 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
There was slim pickings last year in position players. Even the guy picked ahead of Lincecum, Drew Stubbs has question marks about his chances of hitting well in the majors. Only Evan Longoria was a can't miss position pick. Rowell was picked before and is nice but very young.
Snider, Marrero and Rowell would have been nice, but as high schoolers, it would be years before they contribute anything.
I don't know how loaded prospect-wise, the position players are, but I hope Sabean just picks the best players available, regardless of what position the player plays, but with a preference for college players who are further developed and closer to making the majors when skills are close.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 11, 2007 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by groug on May 11, 2007 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by howtheyscored on May 13, 2007 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
So I don't really mind that. I wish he was better, but I can't fault the decision process.
by groug on May 11, 2007 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Roger on May 15, 2007 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by groug on May 11, 2007 11:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 11:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Grrr.
by howtheyscored on May 11, 2007 12:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Now you're getting the idea! I've been writing this for a few years now, but pitching is the way to go. 11-13 positions on every team is made up of pitchers. Everyone needs pitching or would love an upgrade on pitching. Middle rotation starters (historically - Lilly and Meche pitching great this season) like Vicente Padilla, Gil Meche, and Ted Lilly got $10-11M per year in the last off-season, horribly expensive for middle of rotation.
The Giants need to fill their cup first and they are nearly done, their pitching staff is almost all homegrown and I like them as a group, particularly the starting rotation. Once the cup is full, then for each better guy we develop and promote, we now have a pitcher pushed out that we can trade to another team.
Look at how San Diego traded pitching to get A-Gon. Toronto traded pitching to get Overbay, nothing great, but better than anything we've had at 1B recently. The Nationals got Kearns AND Lopez for a couple of good relievers. Tampa Bay has position players coming out of their pores but they need pitching.
We just need to be patient with the pitching staff that we have, make do with what we have in the starting lineup, and real soon, we will have a surplus in pitching that can be traded for young position players.
Hopefully some more pitchers continue to develop this season - like Misch, Sadler, Wilson, Begg, Anderson, Pereira, Griffin, Matos, McKae, Oseguera, Cowart, Synder, Pucetas - and we can trade off either people on the major league roster that these prospects can replace or these prospects specifically, to get better position prospects, particularly corner infielders right now, which is a weak (relatively; they are all weak in any case) position for us right now in the farm system looking forward (and Villalona is at least 3-4 years away from making the majors, if not 6-8, he's only 16 after all.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 11, 2007 12:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Besides, it appears that it isn't just that the Giants draft more pitchers, it is also that they may just be a lot better at identifying pitching talent than hitting talent. Whether the team drafts pitching or hitting, young, cheap talent will have solid trade potential. It was the punting draft picks that got them into such a mess.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
The Giants problem, or rather Sabean's era problem, is that the scouts here were not good at evaluating any prospect, position or pitching, until in recent years. I don't know what the change was, perhaps Tidrow just needed a few years under his belt before he could get things going, but things didn't get better until 2001 when we picked Lowry and Hennessey in the first round, Linden in the supplemental first, and Foppert in the 2nd.
Though I guess that's not entirely fair. 1999 saw the draft of Ainsworth and Jerome Williams in the first round, Taschner in the 2nd. And 2000 saw Bonser and Neikro drafted early, plus Ellison and Burres later on.
But 2001's is the first that had a significant impact on our roster. Then it improved in 2002 with Cain, Fred Lewis, Ortmeier, Hensley (now with SD), and Ishikawa.
The rest are still works in progress as it takes prospects 4-6 years typically to make a major league impact. 2003 had Aardsma, Schierholtz, Sadler, Misch, Sanders, Coutlangus, and Wilson. 2004 had EME, Bowker, Timpner, Hedrick, Frandsen, Jon Sanchez, maybe Dave McKae, and the DFE bust thus far, Jeremiah Luster. 2005, with the first pick in the 4th round, has less top picks, but there's Griffin, Pereira, Joe Martinez, Brian Anderson, Maroul, Antoan Richardson, and Thomas Neal. Last but certainly not least, 2006 with Lincecum, Burris, Tanner, Snyder, McBryde, Rohlinger, Pill, Bocock, Oseguera, Pucetas, and Cowart, though I'm probably missing one or two, last year was a blur for me.
The mess was created by the lack of any good drafts during the 1990's. That's on the previous regime's (Bob Quinn's) head and on Sabean's head (he was head of scouting/player personnel for the Giants before he was named GM). I had previously given Sabean an out because it takes a while to get your people in and to weed out the bad scouts, but he was in charge so he should get the discredit there.
Tidrow has been director of player personnel and overseer of scouting since 1997, when Sabean became GM, so I would give him most of the credit for the turnaround. I would also give credit to the former Dodger, Ron Perranoski, who appears to have started advising Sabean on scouting and player development in 2000. Lastly, I would include the late Pat Dobson, who has been with the Giants for a while as scout (and unofficial advisor to Sabean) until his untimely demise.
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 11, 2007 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Also, just having young players with promise gives you trade possibilities. If you have a decent player in the minors, especially if he was a high draft pick, then he doesn't necessarily have to be that good to bring something back in trade. Granted, a player with Lance Niekro's minor league numbers isn't going to bring back Miguel Cabrera, but every young player, even those who aren't obviously going to be stars, have the potential of bringing back major-league cheap talent, even in the form of middle relievers and backup OFers.
That 25% chance could mean a trade possibility. It could mean a star player. It could also mean that the team isn't scared to trade one prospect because there aren't enough others.
I am with you in that the Giants' problems can't be traced to one draft. But if you are going to lose out on draft picks and the opportunity for minimum-salary major league talent, then don't make it because you just had to sign Michael Tucker. The more you draft, the less likely you are to have to sign Michael Tucker-types, and that money can go to Vladimir Guerrero-types.
And yes, you might just strike gold and draft someone Vlad-quality. A team may be able to sign Bonds or Vlad or Big Papi as a FA, but the only way to end up with multiple star players like that (besides spending huge FA money or trading for big contracts) is to 1) draft them (or sign Latin Americans), or 2) acquire prospects through trade. This team just hasn't shown any willingness to trade older players for prospects, so we need to trade prospects or young players for prospects.
Teams are just far less likely to trade prospects when they hardly have any. If we did have more prospects, we could trade one or two and still hope the others pan out. When you only have one or two legitimate prospects in the whole system, you tend to hang on to them. Sabean did a better job of trading guys like Grilli and Bump and Joe Fontenot when the system had more prospects.
Also, I think the Yankees drafted in our spot in the 2004 draft and got Philip Hughes. I am not sure about the spot, but Lincecum and Phil Hughes in the same rotation? Wow.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on May 11, 2007 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Evan on May 11, 2007 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is it mutually exclusive ?
For some reason our SF Giants cannot or do not develop their young hitters. And we know they have no interest in trading for them.
by wilriv21 on May 11, 2007 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
With the rotation set, there is no need for more starters, so any starter (or pitcher otherwise) that is developed during this time are more expendable (or make current starters more expendable). With the recent trend of salary hikes, having young and cheap pitching prospects is a valuable thing.
Of course, if there is a better batting prospect available (than any other pitchers) at the time you pick you take him. But if there isn't, you shouldn't reach for a bat. Just take the best pitcher available. Baseball, unlike football and basketball, have prospects that really don't make an immediate impact. Reaching to draft a "need" in baseball is ridiculous, as the player will likely not help fill that "need" until 3-4 years down the line.
Best player available. That should always be the philosophy. I know this is an obvious thought, but I'm reading that the team BETTER get some young position players early in the draft. They don't HAVE to get any particular type of player. Just take the best that the draft situation presents.
by sfgfan on May 11, 2007 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by lyricalkiller on May 11, 2007 12:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Goofus on May 11, 2007 12:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by jponry on May 11, 2007 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 11, 2007 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
If they just can't do it their way, go hire Rick Barry to teach them his method. If you really want to win rather than just collect your paycheck, you would do that.
And it is not like learning how to bunt in baseball, that rarely decides a game, whereas in many losses, if there was one guy who would have learned to shoot free throws at 90% success, his team would have won instead.
Would you rather be embarrassed shooting granny style or would you rather be wearing a championship ring?
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on May 11, 2007 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Now, I agree that free throws, like most skill, may not be something you can fix overnight. But you can at least try. In the same article, I think, Baron, Andris and a few others went straight to the stripe after warmups. It's not like they're practicing for naught.
Pietrus needs to understand he's got flaws and they only get fixed through admission of fault and work to get better.
by sfgfan on May 11, 2007 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
"If I practice free throws today, I will think about it tomorrow," he said. "If I practice free throws today, I would probably break the rim."
After Davis, who also missed a free throw as Golden State blew a five-point lead in the final 53 seconds of Game 2, finished his media responsibilities, he headed straight for the foul line. Al Harrington and Andris Biedrins did the same. But Pietrus just looked on.
"You would think that I could make at least one, but I missed both of them," he said. "I feel sorry for my teammates, because they played very well. I'm trying not to think about it. It already happened, so there's nothing I can do about it now."
He did have an interesting recovery plan, however.
"I'm going to go home, play with my puppy, take him to Golden Gate Park and make him happy," Pietrus said.
[Source: SFGate (toward the bottom)]
by sfgfan on May 11, 2007 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Conversely, I'm hopeful that Biedrins has a new confidnce on the stripe after proving to himself he can do it under pressure Monday night.
by Goofus on May 11, 2007 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
You know, Goofus, you're not nearly as goofy as your screen name would imply. Tell me, did you take it from those old Highlights magazines?
by English Professor on May 11, 2007 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by howtheyscored on May 13, 2007 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was good to see DFish in da house
by wilriv21 on May 11, 2007 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by jponry on May 11, 2007 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have two words for this problem
by tk on May 11, 2007 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I have two words for this problem
by jponry on May 11, 2007 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I have two words for this problem
by tk on May 11, 2007 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I have two words for this problem
I would just turn the sound down on MLB.tv, but the image goes black/freezes too often.
by jponry on May 11, 2007 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I have two words for this problem
by juanboy on May 11, 2007 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: I have two words for this problem
by howtheyscored on May 11, 2007 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sharksrog on May 11, 2007 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Hitting prospects never develop into anything good, so only way to get hitters is FA vets so why bother developing hitting prospects.
by zenbitz on May 11, 2007 12:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Now, I'm counting on the Villalona era to begin in the not too distant future and make me forget Minor, Bernard, Rios, and Cruz.
by Sayhey on May 11, 2007 2:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
trading pitching for hitting
Here is a list of major league position players that Sabean has traded young pitching for since 1997 (by transaction dates):
2006
Hillenbrand
2005
Winn
2004
Ricky Ledee
2003
Dustan Mohr
AJ
Eric Young
2002
Bill Mueller (from Cubs)
Kenny Lofton
2001
Shinjo (and Relaford for Estes)
Desi Relaford (later traded for David Bell)
John Vander Wal
Andres Galarraga
1999
Bobby Estalella (in exchange for Chris Brock, not a homegrown talent)
1996
J.T. Snow
Ramon Martinez
As you can see, most of the transactions were for rent-a-bats. Very few lasted more than a season with us. Most of Sabean's successful transactions have been trading young pitching for established pitching (Livan, Nen, a bunch of relievers).
Obviously, the biggest trade of the Sabean era was the Matt Williams trade, which wasn't trading away young pitching for bats. Also, getting Burks for Darryl Hamilton was huge, but it wasn't getting a bat for young pitching.
If anything, we've spent our time trying get bats thru free agency, which we've been moderately successful at until the last few years, when the pickings have been very slim. Relying on that practice puts us at the mercy of the marketplace and we may not fill our needs with good players. A lot of team are locking up their position players before they hit the market.
If our plan has been to trade young pitching for bats, we've done a horrible job at implementing it.
I guess the bottom line is that there are many good position players in the majors. They must have come from somehwere. I'm guessing that nearly all of them were drafted by a major league team. We should try to draft some ourselves instead of relying on other teams to figure that out for us and hoping that one day down the road, other teams have fire sales or let those guys walk as free agents. that means drafting corner infielders and outfielders that have a lot of power potential, not just speedy middle infielders and outfielders that can steal bases but can't hit a double.
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 2:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by jponry on May 11, 2007 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
And I believe we did trade a young pitcher in the Burks deal, although I can't remember the name and I'm too lazy to look it up.
But I agree with you on principle. Stockpiling pitchers to trade for hitters only makes sense if you make good trades.
by Stuttering John Tamargo on May 11, 2007 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
A Jim Stoops reference!
Hooray for Jim Stoops!
by Grant on May 11, 2007 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
And yes, we did get Burks for Hamilton and a 26-year old single A pitcher named Jim Stoops, but Hamilton was the real trade bait, so I didn't include it...though Stoops did pitch 3 games for the Rockies that year.
Maybe it was a judgement call.
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
"That Juan Pierre guy hits .300 and steals bases!"
Sabean: "Cool!!!"
by Punch Rockgroin on May 11, 2007 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
NEVERTHELESS, my point stands.
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
Granted, Sabean doesn't always identify the best talent for which to trade, but in most of those trades, Sabean has parted with very little, guys who never made the majors for more than a cup of coffee if that. In return, he did get actual major-league talent (and also Ricky Ledee).
If you want better players in trade, though, you generally are going to have to trade better prospects, and deal with it if they become good (unless AJ Pierzynski is what you get back). If you can't handle that, then you are just mad that Sabean doesn't fleece the other GMs, and you can't expect that unless every trade is with Jim Bowden or Bill Bavasi.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by English Professor on May 11, 2007 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
But I certainly don't mind trading good pitching for good hitting, but that isn't what has happened. If anything, we've traded a bunch of marginal pitching talent (with a HUGE exception) for marginal hitting (and Ledee). I suppose that's fine if you're trying to fill out a roster and add some depth, but we need core lineup type hitters, which have been lacking.
If our pitching has been good enough to trade for those type of players, how come we haven't seen that happen? If it isn't, then a strategy built upon doing so isn't going to work.
Relying on other organizations to develop position players is not going to be a winning strategy in the long term. Yes, we can sign some free agents and make trades, but that doesn't mean we can't do that AND develop young hitters to replace aging veterans for a cheaper price.
It just boggles the mind that one organization can go so long without developing a single good position player.
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
Now, with FAs Zito and Morris, and homegrown Lowry, Cain, and Lincecum, we have starting pitching to spare. It is too late to get much of a haul from some of our young guys, but as the wealth of pitching from our lower levels starts to move up, there very well may be a lot of value in trade.
Also, developing pitching doesn't just mean that you have prospects to trade. You can also trade established guys as the prospects become ready to take their places, and the established guys will really bring back real hitters.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on May 11, 2007 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by Roger on May 15, 2007 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by zenbitz on May 11, 2007 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
by nostocksjustbonds on May 11, 2007 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: trading pitching for hitting
An Econ professor once quoted "capitalism is the worst economic system in the world - except for all the others." Drafting amateurs isn't necessarily the best way to acquire talent, but it's the world we live in. Learn to do it well. Or get someone who can.
If we draft, say, Andrew Too-Tall Brackman at #10 instead of a power hitter, I'll know there is absolutely no hope for this group. Oh wait, I already knew that. Nevermind.
by Lyle on May 11, 2007 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by Rude thoughtless little pig on May 11, 2007 2:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by JakeS on May 11, 2007 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by sfgfan on May 11, 2007 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
Except replace "writing" with "booze", and "reality" with "the Giants".
by Josh from Hollywood on May 11, 2007 4:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by milesntrane on May 11, 2007 5:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by The Thrill on May 11, 2007 10:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
by The Thrill on May 11, 2007 10:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Anarchy
But this brings up an interesting question: Are the Giants just terrible at identifying good, young hitters, or do they pick the right guys in the draft but screw them up in the development process? Or, perhaps, both.
by Dan from NM on May 12, 2007 10:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















