6-man rotation?
At this point, it looks like there is no room for Lincecum in the rotation. Zito and Cain are not going anywhere, and it'd take multiple bad starts by Lowry, Morris, or Ortiz, who are all pitching well at this point, before Tim gets a chance to crack the rotation.
This article , however, implies that Tim will be up pretty soon, and Sabean says something along the lines of "bringing up Lincecum to bolster a sagging late-inning relief crew". Now, this is just personal preference, but I don't want Tim to pitch in the bullpen, ever. He's just too good, and you want your best pitchers pitching in the rotation. The only solution I can think of is a 6-man rotation.
I'm not sure how feasible it is, and I haven't really looked into the last time a major league team had a 6-man rotation for an extended period of time, but is it worth a try? It could help out the bullpen indirectly, because the rotation might be allowed to work deeper into games, because of the extra day of rest. I'm thinking kind of like the Japanese League, where they have 6-man rotations and their pitchers seem to throw deeper into games.
The worst part about this idea is how it'll affect Cain, namely that he won't pitch as many games, and the way he's pitching, we want him out there as often as possible. But, on the flip side, the fewer innings the bullpen pitches, the better. Is this an idea worth looking at, or no?
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
Re: 6-man rotation?
Guys sometimes come out because of too many pitches, but often it is just because they have lost effectiveness. I don't think that it is throwing every 5th day that causes arm strain so much as throwing too many high-leverage pitches during a start.
With his arm, Lincecum shouldn't have much trouble returning to starter form if he starts in the pen. Plus, our pen needs so much help that he might as well go there. Lincecum has exactly the kind of stuff that is effective out of the pen. I don't know if we can say the same for Ortiz or Lowry. Besides, they are doing fine for now.
When one of them starts failing, then Lincecum starts.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Apr 24, 2007 10:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
Also, after his start last night, I think it might behoove the Giants to give him a few more starts in AAA.
by jponry on Apr 24, 2007 10:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
Walking 6 in 6.1 innings isn't so good, even if he didn't allow a hit. It is probably just an aberration, but you still want to make sure that it won't happen with regularity.
Also, I don't know exactly what they are working on with him either. The extra BB may have been because he was working on something in particular. He is working on different pitches down there, and better it happen there than in the bigs.
by North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan on Apr 24, 2007 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by E Ticket on Apr 25, 2007 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
Still, I can't really get behind the idea much. Brian has said that Tim is comfortable throwing 135 or 140 pitches in a game. Why would you place him in a role in which he might throw only about a third that many?
by sharksrog on Apr 25, 2007 6:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Role For Lincecum?
The relief role I can see Lincecum filling is entering the game at the beginning of either the 6th, 7th, or 8th inning in a game the Giants are trailing and then finishing that game (getting a few come from behind wins along the way). You can reasonablely predict that this will happen at a rate suficient to allow Lincecum to pitch twice a week as Sabean indictated would be the goal if he is brought up. This would allow Lincecum to get his feet wet with MLB hitters while the rest of the bullpen pitches with the lead and with inherited runners already on base. If the Giants give Lincecum this role he is going to chew up 5 innings a week in two appearances a week. The Giants will only need a 6 man bullpen and therefore will have room to add Frandsen back on to our 25 Man Roster to provide middle infield depth.
The guestion is, which 2 relievers go? I would think that Sanchez would go down to replace Lincecum in Fresno's rotation. Who else would go? Not Benitez, Hennessey, or Taschner as they are pitching too well in very important roles. Kline is signed for two years and can't be traded until June so you know he isn't going anywhere. Do Chulk or Correia have any options left? If not, do you trade one of them?
by giantsrainman on Apr 25, 2007 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Role For Lincecum?
The only relievers with unrestricted options available are Taschner, Sanchez, and Hennessey.
I don't see the Giants going with a 6-man pen, though.
by EliminateMe on Apr 25, 2007 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Role For Lincecum?
by giantsrainman on Apr 25, 2007 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Role For Lincecum?
As for the Giants getting rid of two relievers, Sanchez moving to the Fresno's rotation makes sense - except when will he realistically get a shot at becoming a Giant's starter? His short term future, sans trades, is proabably as a reliever. The other obvious move would be to trade Chulk. Actually, Hennessey might acutally garner somthing decent at this point.
Longer term, Lowry has the potential to garner what the Giant's need - a hitting OFer. The question is, when would that trade take place?
by GiantJim on Apr 26, 2007 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Role For Lincecum?
by sharksrog on Apr 25, 2007 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by someguynamedg on Apr 25, 2007 8:28 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by dangjackson on Apr 25, 2007 8:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
Lowry in particular strikes me as a bulldog who plays with a lot of pride and a chip on his shoulder. I suspect his and Morris's' success has more to do with being healthy now than anything.
by Goofus on Apr 25, 2007 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by sfgfan on Apr 25, 2007 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Both BMolina and I thank you
by wilriv21 on Apr 25, 2007 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Both BMolina and I thank you
Now, when the pitchers actually say bad things about their catcher (no names named), that's more signficant...
by EliminateMe on Apr 25, 2007 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by someguynamedg on Apr 25, 2007 10:58 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by Skaldheim on Apr 25, 2007 11:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Apr 25, 2007 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by hometownboy on Apr 26, 2007 2:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: 6-man rotation?
by someguynamedg on Apr 26, 2007 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















