Bonds's head size
Like watching a car wreck, I couldn't help but check out the Game of Shadows excerpt in Chronicle......mentioned this:
Bonds had gone from a size 42 to a size 52 jersey; from size 10 ½ to size 13 cleats; and from a size 7 1/8 to size 7 ¼ cap, even though he had taken to shaving his head
I'm not gonna try to talk about his feet growing 10%....but the size of his head has often been cited as evidence of his freakishness. 1/8" in 10 years? People are telling me they can see this with naked eye, let alone it being "humongous"?
I'm preaching to the choir here, yeah. Just nuts.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
43 comments
Comments
Re: Bonds's head size
by mxmob33 on Feb 27, 2007 9:30 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Feb 27, 2007 11:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by PacBellBoozer on Feb 27, 2007 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Feb 27, 2007 1:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by sfgfan on Feb 27, 2007 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by stress on Feb 27, 2007 4:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by PacBellBoozer on Feb 27, 2007 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by stress on Feb 27, 2007 4:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by PacBellBoozer on Feb 27, 2007 6:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 27, 2007 9:41 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by hairball on Feb 27, 2007 10:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention
by wjackalope on Feb 27, 2007 9:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
When I was born, the doctor put me through a CAT scan because he assumed, based on my freakish cranium, that I was mentally retarded.
I'm sure he was happy when the scan validated his initial opinion.
by oneflapdown on Feb 27, 2007 9:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by someguynamedg on Feb 27, 2007 10:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by hairball on Feb 27, 2007 10:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
Hopefully, time will put things in perspective and nobody else has to deal with the hysterics of the, well, hysterical. With luck time will do that.
by howtheyscored on Feb 27, 2007 10:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
People seem to be quick to accuse (jokingly, sarcastically, or knowingly) hitters of being "juicers" the second they pass 40 HRs. However, when a pitcher can strike out 200 in a season or recover from injuries faster than they should, they attribute it all to talent or (dare I say) "heart".
by sfgfan on Feb 27, 2007 11:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
After all, Grimsley was one of the biggest names in this thing for a short while, and though he was never very good, he was a pitcher. But now both of those facts (his name and position) are forgotten because what people care about is hating Barry Bonds, and if that means noticing Home Runs because Barry Bonds hits homeruns and not strikeouts because he doesn't, that's what they're going to notice.
In my opinion, anyway. That;s just the way I see it. Could be wrong. Could very possibly be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Feb 27, 2007 6:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by howtheyscored on Feb 27, 2007 6:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Chin up, soldier!
Oh, and Barry just said on arrival at Scottsdale that he's going to keep playing beyond this season, so get ready for another hitch or two.
The adversarial nature of baseball means it's every team against all the others. The regional and national media members have favorite teams as well -- and almost none of them root for the San Francisco Giants.
They will attack as long as Bonds is Big and swatting homers.
by Moggeee on Feb 27, 2007 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Someone's gotta say it
by hairball on Feb 27, 2007 10:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
We may have an expert witness here
by Moggeee on Feb 27, 2007 10:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Someone's gotta say it
by Grant on Feb 27, 2007 2:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Someone's gotta say it
by E Ticket on Feb 27, 2007 2:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Someone's gotta say it
by biff pocoroba on Feb 27, 2007 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On False Advertisement:
by howtheyscored on Feb 27, 2007 6:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
Yes, Keith Olberman, noted legal expert. What a joke.
How about this little diddy?
Now what does Kim Bell have to do with Jason Grimsley? The answer is NOTHING. It's just more innuendo. Grimsley lives in the same neighborhod that Kim Bell once did. Thus, Bonds used roids. Total nonsequitor.
Also, Novisky is an IRS agent. an IRS agent. He appointed himself a drug agent. Just lovely.
This part is my favorite:
"There is no reason, no whisper, no allegation that suggests Howard is cheating," he wrote. "In fact, there is plenty of talk that he is clean. But how can you blindly trust anyone anymore?"
You just gotta love the media. Absolutely NO EVIDENCE exists that Ryan Howard used roids or any other drug, and Dan Weasel writes a column accusing him of cheating, even though Weasel ACKNOWLEDGES that he has NO EVIDENCE, not even a whisper! AND there's "plenty of talk" to the contrary! JUST IGNORE THAT AND SPREAD A BASELESS RUMOR!! FUN! FUN! FUN!
This scandal is very much media driven, to say the least. And the SF Comical reporters just used an unfounded media accusation against Ryan Howard as evidence that Bonds is hurting the game. With who? Did any Phillie fans accuse Howard of cheating? NO. So far as I can tell, he was their favorite player. I'd say Dan Weasel spreading lies about Howard cheating is bad for the game. He's hurting the game. Not Bonds.
Also, Grimsley, a pitcher, got busted for using roids. Thus, power hitters are guilty of using roids. Jeez. You'd think these "reporters" would have taken a class in logic at some point in their education. Just awful.
Lastly, there's this:
Now, I admit I haven't read the book or the grand jury testimony, but from what I understand from reading media accounts and the excerpts, is that Bonds testified that he did not KNOWINGLY use steroids. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but that's my understanding.
If I'm right, however, these guys are complete assholes. These guys illegally received secret grand jury testimony and wrote the friggin' book containing that material. You'd think they would at least get that part of the story right. Or perhaps it's plausible that Bonds didn't knowingly use roids, but not plausible that Bonds didn't use roids at all. Yeah. That's the ticket. That's a better storyline than the truth!
by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 27, 2007 10:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by out machine on Feb 27, 2007 10:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Cold Pizza getting colder
The truth is that Bonds (via his attorney) stated that he would like to cooperate, but that so long as he is under investigation by the grand jury, he can't help. The attorney went so far as to ask the SF US attorney, in writing, whether Bonds was still a subject of the grand jury probe. The US attorney refused to answer yes or no. So, Mitchell was told sorry, Bonds can't help. In other words, he was pleading the 5th. Fine. That's not evidence of guilt or innocence. But that also is not the same as simply "refusing to cooperate." I seemed to have read that somewhere recently. Oh yeah. I read it yesterday on ESPN!
Second, Crawford asked about the players union telling the players "not to cooperate" with the Mitchell probe. Hello? Is that what the Union said? Is it possible that the Union actually told the players that it was up to them as individuals as to whether or not they would cooperate with Mitchell.
I know. Sports journalists are an easy target. But so long as they are going to spout outright falsehoods and call it "news" then they are going to get called on it. Idiots.
by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 27, 2007 11:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
Yes... that's Barry Bonds.. never producing unless it's contract time. The guy won an MVP right after he signed a long-term deal in 1993, and then had argably the greatest offensive season in history in 2002 after signing another deal. Maybe he just gets confused about the definition of "contract year." And again... the "to some around the Giants" preface can't see journalism with a telescope.
Bonds certainly wasn't his old self in the first half of 2006, but can you really describe a .971 OPS and surprisingly adequate defense as "so awful"? That's just lazy writing.
While I'm rather certain that no teams offered him $16M, can a journalist categorically say that no other clubs expressed interest at all?
Let every other journalist in the country defend you on this one, boys... they're doing it anyway. When you have made a lot of money trying to create a firestorm about a baseball player's drug use, trying to downplay the importance of the case in your own defense doesn't smell very good. I don't think these hacks should have been threatened with prison, but I'd like to think there are better reasons for this other than that their actions "posed no harm to national security, and there was no threat to anyone's physical safety." It's not like Bonds is a terrorist, despite what Jeff Pearlman says.
Really, does the fact that Bush said five kind words to you when you met him before the correspondent's dinner have any relevance in any of this? (As an aside, Ted Robinson really thinks it does, and he brought it up several times when hosting on KNBR last week.)
Dennis Miller had an old bit on Weekend Update about supporting the first amendment issues behind 2 Live Crew during their obscenity trial, but wishing that it was someone more talented like Jimi Hendrix that was at the forefront of the issue. That's kind of how I feel about this case. I'm glad these two self-aggrandizing hacks aren't under investigation anymore, but it would be a lot easier to support, say, Christiane Amanpour.
by Pants Man on Feb 27, 2007 11:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
It could be argued that part of the reason why the defendants got off with lenient pleas was because the case was compromised by the leaks.
by mxmob33 on Feb 27, 2007 12:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
Also, "The grand jury leak had posed no harm to national security, and there was no threat to anyone's physical safety."
BUT "Sports and Drugs" do pose a threat to national security and people's safety?
Really? Bonds, Giambi and Sheffield all look pretty safe to me. So does Marion Jones.
And grand jury leaks undermine the integrity of the criminal justice system (not unlike perjury) ...but that's it. Nothing important or anything.
by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 27, 2007 1:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
"from a size 7 1/8 to size 7 ¼ cap?"
Not only what is the source, who in their right mind would ssuggest that an 1/8 inch difference in CAP size tells us anything relevant about HEAD size.
Not only no sorces, no analytical value.
by allfrank on Feb 27, 2007 1:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Bonds's foot size
by Lyle on Feb 27, 2007 2:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's foot size
by stobgopper on Feb 27, 2007 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OT: Is your sig a WW reference?
by the degenerate on Feb 27, 2007 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the good news
On Feb. 15, Ellerman pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice and three other felonies. Under terms of a plea agreement, he faces two years in prison -- more time behind bars than any of the steroid dealers convicted in the BALCO conspiracy and any of the star athletes who used BALCO drugs to enhance their performance.
I hadn't heard that yet. Apparently, it wasn't as prominently reported as Barry Bonds' hat size. Then again, if you're a big rodeo buff then you, of course, were the first to know.
by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 27, 2007 3:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: the good news
I remember how determined I was not to betray my homework-eating dog.
These twits kill me. They still can't figure out why the only people who take them seriously are other, even sillier politicians, media hacks, and Bonds haters.
by E Ticket on Feb 27, 2007 6:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: the good news
E, one of your best lines yet. Had me rolling. Instant classic.
by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 27, 2007 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by Kid Fresh on Feb 27, 2007 4:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by Stoned Slacker on Feb 28, 2007 7:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by mxmob33 on Feb 28, 2007 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Bonds's head size
by brauber on Feb 27, 2007 5:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 
























