Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
According to this article:
http://www.torontosun.com/Sports/Baseball/2007/12/06/4710138-sun.html
Seems like a strange match to me, but i'm not sure how much truth there is to it. Also, there's more on the Lincecum/Rios situation, but nothing really new.
This FanPost is reader-generated, and it does not necessarily reflect the views of McCovey Chronicles. If the author uses filler to achieve the minimum word requirement, a moderator may edit the FanPost for his or her own amusement.
0 recs |
66 comments
Comments
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
I like this guy.
As for Matsui...
...him?
by jponry on Dec 6, 2007 8:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by UnleashTheGore on Dec 6, 2007 9:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Natto on Dec 6, 2007 9:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by UnleashTheGore on Dec 6, 2007 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by JRPhillips on Dec 6, 2007 2:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by jasomack on Dec 6, 2007 8:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
"I like Lincecum and hope we don't trade him," a Giants scout said. "I saw Rios plenty this season. He's a proven run producer and he's only going to get better. But the thing is with our club, we're not one hitter away, we need at least two proven hitters."
by mxmob33 on Dec 6, 2007 8:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Unlike you two, I want to point out this part.
by multiphasic on Dec 6, 2007 9:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Dec 6, 2007 9:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by milesntrane on Dec 6, 2007 9:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On the other hand...
"I like Lincecum and hope we don't trade him," a Giants scout said. "I saw Rios plenty this season. He's a proven run producer and he's only going to get better. But the thing is with our club, we're not one hitter away, we need at least two proven hitters."
by Goofus on Dec 6, 2007 9:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: On the other hand...
by Goofus on Dec 6, 2007 9:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: On the other hand...
by mxmob33 on Dec 6, 2007 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Big Daddy J on Dec 6, 2007 9:22 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
cough cough Zito cough cough
by SoFa King Mike on Dec 6, 2007 9:22 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by milesntrane on Dec 6, 2007 9:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by UnleashTheGore on Dec 6, 2007 9:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Scottsdale on Dec 6, 2007 9:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by taliesin on Dec 6, 2007 9:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by UnleashTheGore on Dec 6, 2007 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by nvsfg on Dec 6, 2007 12:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
Oh...we weren't talking seating rows?
by Karlifornia on Dec 6, 2007 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I love this part....
Thought it was worth repeating, even though we're at least three hitters away.
by Grant on Dec 6, 2007 9:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hennesorreia
by mxmob33 on Dec 6, 2007 9:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
Jays manager John Gibbons says the Giants proposed the deal.
If that were the case, wouldn't the ball be in Toronto's court? It seems backwards to propose a deal, have the other team accept, then stop to think about it for 2+ days.
I guess it's just my hatred for John Gibbons getting in the way.
by Woody Wins on Dec 6, 2007 9:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by sfgfan on Dec 6, 2007 9:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey did you guys see this part?
He tried to put it in the drink!
by WalrusMan on Dec 6, 2007 9:59 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by northbay60 on Dec 6, 2007 10:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by leftymalo on Dec 6, 2007 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Kestrel on Dec 6, 2007 10:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by jponry on Dec 6, 2007 10:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Kestrel on Dec 6, 2007 10:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by ResDog on Dec 6, 2007 10:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
"No comment" says Cashman
There was a time such a question would have been dismissed. But Matsui is signed to a reasonable contract ($26 million over the next two seasons) and the Yankees could get creative with him. They can use Johnny Damon in left and the Big G as the DH.
The Giants, who are desperate for offense, are reportedly interested. It would probably take Matsui and something else (a prospect) to bring back one of their starters. Matsui isn't getting Tim Lincecum. But could he he part of a package for Noah Lowry?
Matsui has a NTC but has said he would waive it if asked.
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2007/12/06/could-matsui-be-on-the-market/
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 10:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: "No comment" says Cashman
I would certainly do the former, but definitely not the latter.
by BigO on Dec 6, 2007 11:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: "No comment" says Cashman
I'd be so happy with that.
by groug on Dec 6, 2007 1:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by sam23 on Dec 6, 2007 11:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
The only positive that would come from this is revenue from the Bay Area Asian population coming in droves to see Matsui for the next 2 years. Methinks Magowabaer is behind this one.
by southcitysteve on Dec 6, 2007 11:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by sfgfan on Dec 6, 2007 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 11:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by nick on Dec 6, 2007 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Aadik on Dec 6, 2007 11:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by S49erfan on Dec 6, 2007 12:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 6, 2007 12:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 12:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by sfgfan on Dec 6, 2007 12:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Listen to Randal
Dante: "I don't want to talk to you."
Randal: "Fine, just let me borrow your car."
Dante: "Why should I loan you my car?"
Randal: "I want to rent a movie."
Dante: "You want to rent a movie."
Randal: "I want to rent a movie."
Dante: sigh
Randal: "What's that for?"
Dante: "You work in a video store!"
Randal: "I work in a ####ty video store. I want to go to a good video store so I can get a good movie."
by Skaldheim on Dec 7, 2007 8:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
however, if Lowry isn't getting any kind of interest (probably because other teams think Cain or Linc are available) this could be a "get something for Lowry while we still can" type of move, which I wouldn't be opposed to.
If we can then trade Matsui in a year or 2 for younger guys, I don't see this move as being that bad.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 6, 2007 12:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
As Lefty points out on his blog (and I'm sure it's probably been pointed out here somewhere in the past), Lowry may not have very much value right now and may have to prove himself (at least healthy) come spring training.
by sfgfan on Dec 6, 2007 12:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 12:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by sfgfan on Dec 6, 2007 12:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 12:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by groug on Dec 6, 2007 1:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by wilriv21 on Dec 6, 2007 1:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
The Yanks move Lowry to the Pen vs. left handed batters ( he posted pretty good number last year vs. lefties) and get some depth to man their outfield tell they can find something better. Giants get a guy that hits in one of the hart of the order slots and option(s) to hold down an infield slot or two.
by daveinexile on Dec 6, 2007 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by JakeS on Dec 6, 2007 12:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Buzzword on Dec 6, 2007 1:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
Cain for Rios- no. Cain has demonstrated he could be a 20 game winner. Rios has demonstrated he can be a 25/25 All Star outfielder. I would not trade a legit, potential 20 game winner for a star (not SUPERSTAR) outfielder.
Lincecum for Rios... maybe. I sip the Lincecum kool aid, but dude has made 24 starts and has a 4.00 ERA. Van Landingham, Estes, heck, even Lowry started 6-0. I think Lincecum is special, but value Cain much, much more. So, I would trade Lincecum for Rios only if the Blue Jays would take back 2 bad contracts in return (pick from Durham, Roberts, Aurilia, Kline) and fork back two TOP PROSPECTS of their own.
by Kid Fresh on Dec 6, 2007 1:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 6, 2007 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by zenbitz on Dec 6, 2007 6:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
"I like Lincecum and hope we don't trade him," a Giants scout said. "I saw Rios plenty this season. He's a proven run producer and he's only going to get better. But the thing is with our club, we're not one hitter away, we need at least two proven hitters."
Sorry, couldn't help it. It's been a while since anyone posted this...
by JRPhillips on Dec 6, 2007 2:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Giants discuss Hideki Matsui
by Skaldheim on Dec 7, 2007 8:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















