The Case Against....
According to this article, the Blue Jays and Giants are talking about Alex Rios for half of Caincecum, though the Jays would prefer Cain. Sabean has referred to the potential deal as "interesting."
The case against the insanity, now with bullet points:
- With Alex Rios, the Giants would still have a below-average offense, and their rotation wouldn't be as likely to be a strength as it would be with Lincecum. Ground gained: zero.
- The Giants would have Rios under control for three years, though he's just now entering his arbitration years. In a best-case scenario, he becomes a star, but the Giants wouldn't get him at a bargain price for the last two years he's under contract in that scenario. So the Giants would trade a five-year window of Lincecum or Cain for a three-year window with Rios, but still have multiple lineup holes that would hurt their chances to compete. I just don't understand what that accomplishes other than closing a window of fiscal maneuverability.
Another thing I don't understand: how is Rios still under contract for three more seasons, as the Chronicle is reporting? He's had more than 400 at-bats in four seasons, and he was already eligible for arbitration last season. By my admittedly amateur understanding, that would make him eligible for just two more arbitration years.
- Rios is good, no question. He's young, and his power numbers are trending upward. He's an excellent athlete and a good baserunner. He is not, however, the building block of a franchise, and he isn't that close. Rios just isn't good enough to make that needle-off-the-record screech that the Giants should need to trade Lincecum or Cain. A 26-year-old hitting .297/.354/.498 just isn't that special. It's impressive, sure, and the Giants sure don't have anything that can sniff that, but it isn't as impressive as a 22-year-old striking out over a batter an inning in the majors after just 63 minor league innings, or a 22-year-old cracking the top ten in his league's ERA.
- Rios is a corner outfielder. The Giants don't have very many interesting young players, but two of the interesting young players they do have are corner outfielders. The difference between a) Lewis/Schierholtz with Lincecum and b) Rios without Lincecum isn't worth the risk.
The Blue Jays are the wrong trade partner. Back away, Brian. Don't make any sudden movements, and get the hell out. And, as an aside, what is this crap:
Adam Lind for Lincecum. We are officially through the looking glass. I would probably trade Nate Schierholtz for Lind. I'd think about it, discuss it with scouts, and probably decide that Lind's power potential makes up for his horrible defensive reputation. Adam Lind for Lincecum? If another GM offered that to me, I'm not sure if I would pat him on the head or kick him in the crotch. The Jays-don't-like-Lincecum angle also sets this up:
Oh, so it's Lincecum plus other players for Rios. As long as we're in fantasy land, maybe we can build some mud golems, use some sort of witchery to breath life into their shapeless bodies, teach them how to play baseball, and include them in a deal once they're at an All-Star level. It's only fair, as the Blue Jays can't just get Lincecum as a return for Alex Rios. The Giants will also throw twelve griffins into the deal. They have the head of an eagle, you know.
I can't take these rumors seriously, even if they come from a local paper. I just wish they'd stop.
0 recs |
229 comments
Comments
Re: The Case Against....
by hollywoodlarry on Dec 4, 2007 10:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
And yeah Rios has played 4 seasons in the majors, so unless I'm mistaken he'd only be under contract for two more seasons.
by Cainer on Dec 4, 2007 11:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Mr Scruff on Dec 4, 2007 11:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Mr Scruff on Dec 4, 2007 11:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jponry on Dec 4, 2007 11:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
But really, this shouldn't be all that intriguing at all. Rios is good but he's not that good. He's not good enough that his addition to the offense would make up for the massive downgrade in the rotation! And Adam Lind? What the hell is that?
Ugh, I thought I was going to have to stop WSAL;JEA;LWJ;LALing at stupid Lincecum/Cain rumors. Just stop it.
by jponry on Dec 4, 2007 11:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
In another thread, said that in exchange for Timmy or Matt, I thought two Joey Votto players would be about right (though I think it should take a little more to pry Cain away from us than Lincecum). Rios, in my mind, counts as a bit more than a Joey Votto, which means the other guy could be a bit less, but not that much.
by Smoke on the Water on Dec 5, 2007 9:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Again, I just don't want to see Tim and Matt go, for practically anything. That's not based on stats or anything else, just that I want to root for these two kids for years to come.
by JRPhillips on Dec 5, 2007 9:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
* Aaron Boone is drawing interest from the Giants, Nationals and Brewers. The key question is what kind of role will he play.
1:57 p.m., from Jayson Stark
* The Giants and Blue Jays have a deal on the table that would send outfielder Alex Rios to San Francisco for pitcher Tim Lincecum. But the Blue Jays appear to be more motivated to make that trade than the Giants. Two baseball men who spoke with the Giants describe them as being "indecisive" about whether they really want to move Lincecum for a big bat and, if they do, about whom they should get for him. Toronto has decided its best strategy to survive in the loaded AL East is to stockpile as many power arms as possible. So the Blue Jays would sacrifice offense if they could pick up an arm like Lincecum.
Seriously? and Aaron Boone? Same old Sabes...
by lincysgiants on Dec 5, 2007 11:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Stop withthe Boone's and Lind's of the world. If teams are going to approach us about Timmy (don't even bother with Matt), then they better come with Rios + certifiable quality. Certainly NOT the other way around!
by wcovington on Dec 5, 2007 4:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 4, 2007 11:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
It's a big piece of cardboard.
by thehavenot on Dec 4, 2007 11:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jponry on Dec 4, 2007 11:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 4, 2007 11:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 7:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So, I guess he couldn't find a piece of cardboard
by thehavenot on Dec 5, 2007 9:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nick on Dec 4, 2007 11:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Do I win for worst joke ever on the MCC?
by thehavenot on Dec 4, 2007 11:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by groug on Dec 5, 2007 12:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by thehavenot on Dec 5, 2007 12:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by SF Pete on Dec 5, 2007 8:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Scottsdale on Dec 5, 2007 1:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Cainer on Dec 4, 2007 11:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
To answer your questions. Rios has not had 4 full years of major league sevice as he did not start the 2004 season in the majors. This is important as a player can not become Free Agent Eligable until after he has achieved 6 or more years of major league service. Alex's first year of arbitration eligability was actually last year as he qualified as a super two. Alex thus has three more years of arbitration before he can become a free agent.
Likewise, Lincecum is actually 6 years (not 5) away from Free Agency (but Cain is only 4). Tim is also on pace to be a super two after 2009 and thus will have four years of arbitration from 2010 thru 2013.
With regards to the rumored trade. If the Rumors are true that the suggested deal is Lincecum or Cain plus sweetners for Rios this is indeed insane for the Giants. But, we don't know that these rumors are true. If the Facts are that the deal is Rios plus sweetners for Lincecum or Cain then it all depends on the sweetners. If say Glaus, Accardo, and an A prospect infielder close to major league ready are the sweetners then this is a fair deal for both teams and I would do the deal.
by giantsrainman on Dec 4, 2007 11:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by thehavenot on Dec 4, 2007 11:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by giantsrainman on Dec 5, 2007 12:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by giantsrainman on Dec 5, 2007 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Kitspool on Dec 4, 2007 11:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Maybe the writer meant Lowry+ for Rios? While that type of deal would greatly favor the Giants, it's a bit more realistic in my view (not that either would be realistic)
Grant pretty much nailed it, nothing to see here. Hopefully just stupid journo BS.
As for Lincecum, I'm pretty sure he is 5 years away from FA, not 6. I don't think you need 6+ actual years of service time for FA, I think 5.55+ is enough. Don't quote me though, I just don't think Lincecum has six years left til FA. He should get his super two (if he does get it) after next year and get 4 years of arb from 2009-12
by NeifiChicken on Dec 4, 2007 11:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Per Cots Baseball Contracts Transactions Glossary
Free Agency Eligibility
A player with at least 6 years of Major League service time and no contract for the next season is eligible to file for free agency and negotiate with any club.
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2003/01/transactions-glossary.html
by giantsrainman on Dec 4, 2007 11:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by giantsrainman on Dec 5, 2007 12:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
If he's not a free agent after 2008 then yep, you're right. I'm just skeptical that 27 starts doesn't equal a year of service time, but I'll be happy to be wrong
by NeifiChicken on Dec 5, 2007 12:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by JRPhillips on Dec 5, 2007 10:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by giantsrainman on Dec 5, 2007 1:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Better deal
"It's intriguing, but not enough to pull the trigger," Sabean said. "There are things we've shut off and things we've kept alive. That's something we've kept alive."
Sabean met with Blue Jays officials again Tuesday to refine the structure of a deal. While Toronto is pushing to include infielder Troy Glaus and his unattractive contract, the Giants told the Blue Jays they aren't interested.
The Giants are seeking an improved proposal, and catching prospect Robinzon Diaz, catcher/first baseman Curtis Thigpen and right-hander Brett Cecil among the quality pieces the Blue Jays might agree to move. Cecil, a hard-throwing reliever, was a 2007 draftee and would be included as a player to be named.
The Giants are far from committed to getting something done, though. They are conflicted because they understand the value of quality pitching, especially in the National League West with its low-scoring games and generously sized ballparks.
But they also place a high value on Rios, a five-tool talent who won't be a free agent until 2010. The 26-year-old has been an All-Star the past two seasons; he hit .297 with 24 home runs and 85 RBIs while playing in 161 games. He has a terrific arm, plays an athletic right field and runs the bases well.
Giants Manager Bruce Bochy managed Rios on an exhibition tour of Japan last year and is said to be enamored with the player.
As a right-handed power hitter, he would be ideal for the middle of the Giants lineup; if the club acquired Rios and made a successful run at free-agent center fielder Andruw Jones, the offense would be transformed both for the short and long term.
Sabean confirmed that he met with Jones' agent, Scott Boras, on Tuesday but described talks as broad. Sabean said the club has not made any offers for free agents, but he was complimentary when asked about Jones, a 10-time Gold Glove winner who hit just .222 last season.
by wilriv21 on Dec 4, 2007 11:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Some player info
Robinzon Diaz: http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Robinzon%20Diaz&pos=C&sid=milb& ;t=p_pbp&pid=433697
Curtis Thigpen: http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Curtis%20Thigpen&pos=C&sid=milb&am p;t=p_pbp&pid=450303
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 12:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Some player info
by giantsrainman on Dec 5, 2007 12:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Some player info
by Mr Scruff on Dec 5, 2007 12:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
by Mr Scruff on Dec 5, 2007 12:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
by giantsrainman on Dec 5, 2007 12:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
by Mr Scruff on Dec 5, 2007 5:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
Really, Brian? You're shocked that no one is drooling over a guy who can't throw strikes or miss bats in the B league? Gee, what a shock.
by KCE on Dec 5, 2007 6:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
by ololo3 on Dec 5, 2007 12:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
On the (admittedly still dim) bright side, Rios can flat out track 'em down in the outfield. Not only that, but apparently he can play a mean CF, where he would be worth more with those offensive numbers. Defense sometimes gets left out of these equations, so I add it here as a reminder.
That said: Noooooo!
by BigO on Dec 5, 2007 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
by Smoke on the Water on Dec 5, 2007 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
Of the three, there is no reason to take another team's mediocrity at catcher or 1B, but Cecil is the steal here. As a sophomore in 2006 at Maryland, he averaged almost a strikeout an inning, has at least two solid pitches, is considered to be intimidating at 6'2", and has the stamina to be a starter. In other words, they could replace Lincecum within a year with this kid.
If I am Sabean, I tell Riccardi that if he wants Lincecum, it will cost him both Rios and Cecil. If Riccardi balks, then fine. We'll keep the kids we have and trade Lowry for what we can get to fill a hole and the sign a FA to fill another.
by Buck Henry on Dec 5, 2007 11:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Believe Toronto has offered more than Rios
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 12:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Better deal
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 12:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Rios is a talented player, but I'd rather have Cain/Lincecum even if the service time was the same. Keep in mind that Cain is signed for 3 more years at middle-reliever money. As Rotoworld put it, we better be getting back something very good to make this work. The fact that the idiot serving as our GM sounds interested is not a good sign.
by Aadik on Dec 5, 2007 12:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
It's not like I thing Lowry is anything super special and I am not completely in love with the Giants corner outfield options ( but for the short term they will do) but trading a couple young controllable pitchers that have shown they can stay at the big league level better at least fill a couple gapping holes ( think 2, 3, 5 & 6 spots on the score card) in your roster for the next 3+ year ( with a little left over) or many more roster roles if for a less amount of time other what the Freak is the point?
by daveinexile on Dec 5, 2007 11:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 1:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
If a GM is not thrilled with the current Free Agent Stating Pitching crop were do they go from there? Considering Willis is traded after Santana what other pitchers are out there to be traded for? Maybe the White Sox float Garland or Vazquez? The O's might listen to big offers on Bedard? A's for one of their 3 starters? So that makes 5 out of 32 teams the are open to trading starting pitching. A Santana, Berdard or an A's trade will require a lot of prospects leaving the other organization. The Giants can get a better fitting trade then this.
by daveinexile on Dec 5, 2007 3:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
For that, you'd being asked to give up a potential star. Sure, his arm might fall off at any moment, but he might also reel off a couple of Cys in his early 20s.
That's the definition of selling low.
Selling low is stupid. Is Rios available? I'd trade Lowry and any other non-Cain/Lincecum pitcher for him, straight up. They're fungible. Potential aces aren't.
by wcw on Dec 5, 2007 4:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jwirt19 on Dec 5, 2007 5:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
So that still means the Whites Sox could listen to offers on Vazquez or the White Sox are no longer shopping starters. The later then reduces the field to 4 teams willing to shop starters. That mean the Giants bargaining position just got stronger.
by daveinexile on Dec 6, 2007 11:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
If your cousin's favorite aunt's mother in law is married to Brian Sabean/Peter Magowan / Larry Baer, its time to start calling in chits now - us "fans" don't want to see the idiocy continue. If you wouldn't give up Lincecum for Delmon Young who was at a comparable service time (and which I sort of agree with), giving him for Rios is idiocy. They trade Lincecum/Cain, and I become an A's fan.
by Aadik on Dec 5, 2007 12:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 12:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
pay off the debt on the belle...the money frees up tons of caishe to be used on the open market
give us 2 quality, mlb ready prospects...one if and one of
give us your first born children to sacrifice to the gods who are still so angry at us, we havent won a ws in 50 years
outside of that...its....have a nice day
sabean really said that rios of cain is "interesting"??? why the fuck was this retard given an extension?
by bacci40 on Dec 5, 2007 2:59 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Goofus on Dec 5, 2007 7:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Thank you everyone. Sabean may be insane, but the MCoven are not, and it was good to read your comments. I shall have to return to my daily browsing and occasional commenting.
Lincecum + for Rios? Plus??????????????????
My head still hurts from reading that crap.
by Poe on Dec 5, 2007 8:01 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I realize Sabean doesn't control what's written, but this isn't exactly great marketing for two of the most valuable trade chips in baseball.
by mxmob33 on Dec 5, 2007 8:30 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by mxmob33 on Dec 5, 2007 8:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
* The Blue Jays are not going to trade A.J. Burnett, Alex Rios or Troy Glaus -- for now. Toronto GM J.P. Ricciardi will probably head home today.
I trust Gammo rumors above all else so hopefully we can breath easy now.
by southcitysteve on Dec 5, 2007 9:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by southcitysteve on Dec 5, 2007 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by ramirez415 on Dec 5, 2007 10:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by ramirez415 on Dec 5, 2007 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Buck Henry on Dec 5, 2007 9:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by KCE on Dec 5, 2007 10:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by BondOrBust on Dec 5, 2007 9:48 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
rios has potential...but he will be 27 come next season....i dont get excited by guys with potential at 27
he was an allstar by default
24 hrs in the al is nothing to write home about
the fact is, fans from all across the nation drool at the prospect of getting either cain or timmy...and they all believe that sabean is stupid enough to deal at least one of them
by bacci40 on Dec 5, 2007 11:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by wcovington on Dec 5, 2007 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
holy shit
now that lineup is something I would look fwd to watching.
by The Gene Hackman on Dec 5, 2007 10:28 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
by mxmob33 on Dec 5, 2007 10:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
pardon the anachronism.
you may return to worry about Rios
by The Gene Hackman on Dec 5, 2007 10:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
by mxmob33 on Dec 5, 2007 10:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
by EliminateMe on Dec 5, 2007 11:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
by groug on Dec 5, 2007 12:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That one..
Of course that could be the alcohol talking a bit, but I think I would have laughed otherwise still.
Man gotta tell you Jimmy Page and Robert Plant in the middle of How Many More Times do pretty good when you're drunk. No that wasn't random at all.
by WalrusMan on Dec 5, 2007 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: That one..
by howtheyscored on Dec 8, 2007 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
by Cookyman on Dec 5, 2007 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: holy shit
by wcovington on Dec 5, 2007 4:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Dylan (SF): I've seen you write that Tim Lincecum is a "freak" before. I think it mainly refers to the fact that his mechanics are so odd that his longevity and chances of injury are completely unpredictable. Does this mean that you would trade him to the Jays straight up for Alex Rios? To me, the Jays have to add a reasonably talented pitcher to the equation.
Will Carroll: No, he's just a straight freak.
There is no single pitcher that I would trade straight up for Lincecum. There are very, very few players that I would take straight up for him and the ones I would are guys like Cabrera, Pujols, Reyes ...
... so yes, I like Tim Lincecum and would be willing to say that the Giants should never trade him.
by BigO on Dec 5, 2007 10:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
You should probably take my opinion with a grain of salt. But not Will's. Will's book "Saving the Pitcher" is arguably the best study of the effects of mechanics on pitching injuries. Will's opinion means something.
And whatever rumor the scouts had out about Tim last spring, Will was acutely aware of it. I asked if he could pass it on to Tim via Tim's dad, and he said a confidentiality agreement prevented him from doing so.
But clearly that rumor didn't change Will's opinion of Tim. When people take their best shot at someone and can't shake the opinion of one of the best observers of pitching around, I would say the subject of their rumor is pretty darn solid.
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 1:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by BigO on Dec 5, 2007 1:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I know that there maybe some hissing in my direction when I suggest (because I was against it) to sign AJones (I promised never to use those two initials again) for something like 3/50. With Winn in left and Nate in right and call it a day.
by Buzzword on Dec 5, 2007 10:58 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
CF
I still wouldn't do it, though. The key for me is: Five years of Cain/Lincecum are more valuable to a team like the Giants than three years of Rios.
by Dan from NM on Dec 5, 2007 11:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
* The Giants and Blue Jays have a deal on the table that would send outfielder Alex Rios to San Francisco for pitcher Tim Lincecum. But the Blue Jays appear to be more motivated to make that trade than the Giants. Two baseball men who spoke with the Giants describe them as being "indecisive" about whether they really want to move Lincecum for a big bat -- and, if they do, about whom they should get for him. Toronto has decided its best strategy to survive in the loaded AL East is to stockpile as many power arms as possible. So the Blue Jays would sacrifice offense if they could pick up an arm like Lincecum.
If we're seriously considering this... shouldn't we actually tell other GM's Lincecum's on the market and see what we can truly get for him before we commit to trading him for Rios and Rios alone? Maybe we can get more somewhere else. Maybe we should just sit back and wait to see what happens with Santana/Haren/Bedard. We should be able to get more than the A's get for Haren being that Lincecum is soooo far from free agency. There should be no sense of urgency on the Giants end to make this deal.... PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by jwirt19 on Dec 5, 2007 11:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by hammystyle on Dec 5, 2007 12:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Goofus on Dec 5, 2007 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh oh.
by Kitspool on Dec 5, 2007 11:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Uh oh.
by Natto on Dec 5, 2007 11:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Uh oh.
by multiphasic on Dec 5, 2007 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Uh oh.
by travis j bagdad on Dec 5, 2007 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I made an effort to go out to the yard and see Linc pitch. I'd never do that just to see Rios.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 11:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Aadik on Dec 5, 2007 12:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by JRPhillips on Dec 5, 2007 11:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against Fitz & Brooks
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 12:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jorge Cantu released by Reds
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 12:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jorge Cantu released by Reds
by Evan on Dec 5, 2007 12:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jorge Cantu released by Reds
My thinking is that he'd be pretty cheap with some upside. If he doesn't pan out, so be it, there'd be little risk in signing him.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 12:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jorge Cantu released by Reds
by jwirt19 on Dec 5, 2007 12:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Jorge Cantu released by Reds
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 1:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by WilltheThrill on Dec 5, 2007 12:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by EliminateMe on Dec 5, 2007 12:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
He can't have my stapler.
by SoFa King Mike on Dec 5, 2007 1:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't Klesko...
by WalrusMan on Dec 5, 2007 8:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
KNBR doesn't know what they're talking about
- Rios is NOT 24 years old. He will be 27 at the start of next season. That means he's entering his prime and really shouldn't be considered a "young player" anymore.
- Rios is NOT an on base machine. He had a respectable .354 last year, but has a lifetime .338, not exactly great.
- He's not a 3 or 4 hitter. At best he's a 3 spot fill-in, but he'd be best suited as a #5 hitter. Lincecum should not be traded for a #5 hitter.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 12:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
#2 - I agree on Cantu. I think his numbers dropped partially because he played in and got hurt in the WBC. After that, his #'s dropped and he fell out of favor. Good time to buy low since we have no other options.
Toronto wants to trade with us again because they still remember how good it felt to screw us with the Accardo/Shea trade.
by benson11 on Dec 5, 2007 1:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 1:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Buzzword on Dec 5, 2007 1:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by ramirez415 on Dec 5, 2007 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
For several years Brian divided up his salary money in order to fill holes around Barry Bonds, failing to fully realize that it was the amazing contribution of Bonds himself that allowed Brian the luxury of filling out his roster with mediocre to good players.
Brian may believe that receiving a star and a couple of hole fillers for a potential superstar is a good thing. Brian is almost certainly wrong if he feels that way.
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 1:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If SF does make this deal.
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 1:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by The Nick on Dec 5, 2007 1:34 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by spartan25 on Dec 5, 2007 1:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 2:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Feliz back for a year isn't a bad thing, as long as the Giants don't do anything stupid. You can't force a trade just for the sake of making a trade. If you don't think someone is offering enough for Lowry/Cain/Lincecume/WHOEVER, you don't just pull the trigger because you're afraid of what your lineup could look like. Panicking = no good.
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but Picnicking = good
by camwoody on Dec 5, 2007 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Yes but Picnicking = good
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
He also believes the Giants won't trade either pitcher...
Collective sigh of relief, anyone?
by The Nick on Dec 5, 2007 2:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Either or both pitchers arms could fall off next year and not trading for Rios still would have been the right move.
by wcw on Dec 5, 2007 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Is this the Giants FO feeding misinformation to their flagship radio station to defend against angry fans in case they trade their ace pitcher? Is Tim really a malcontent? Do I listen to too much sports talk? (Don't answer that last question, please.)
by Kitspool on Dec 5, 2007 3:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by ramirez415 on Dec 5, 2007 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by mxmob33 on Dec 5, 2007 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Any of these things could be true, of course. I have no way of knowing for sure. But I would like to make three comments regarding Tim's relationship with his dad.
First, the two weren't nearly as close after Tim made the majors as most believe. Tim's dad attended Tim's debuts at both San Jose and in San Francisco, but other than watching Tim pitch when the Fresno Giants played in Tacoma last April, Tim's dad didn't attend any of Tim's games. They certainly talked on the phone -- but I'm not sure they talked more than any other father and son.
Second, at the end of the 2007 season, Tim's change up might have been his best pitch. Batters surely swung and missed it a lot. When I saw Tim pitch in San Jose and Stockton, he threw only his fastball and curve. Tim learned the change (which is actually an abbreviated split finger) not from Dave Righetti or anyone else in the Giants' system.
Third, what Tim is -- and that's pretty darn good -- was created by Tim and his father. A Seattle TV guy has said that he saw old footage of Tim's dad pitching, and he couldn't tell the difference between the two pitchers.
And since Tim's dad was clocked at 88 mph at the age of 55, I consider that to be a good thing.
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 4:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Or maybe he threw a bottle of Gatorade at Sabean. I don't know.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 5, 2007 4:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 5:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Supposing for a moment this is all true
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 5, 2007 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Supposing for a moment this is all true
I personally felt Tim was ready to open the season with the Giants -- and his 0.29 ERA at Fresno pretty much confirmed it. Still, the Giants had signed Russ Ortiz with the idea of giving him the #5 spot, and it was better to err on the side of caution with Tim.
Incidentally, Tim struck out eight batters in his first start at Fresno. Three came on his curve, two on his fastball -- and three on his new change (or abbreviated split). Tim definitely appeared major league ready that night.
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 9:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Supposing for a moment this is all true
These allegations about Tim's behavior are really unsettling, probably because I've developed a maternal love for him in the last year and a half. On the other hand, I have low tolerance for bullshit, and I think a lot of this is exactly that.
Holy moly I agree with you on something. The world must be ending.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 6, 2007 5:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
- A guy with potential attitude problems and meddlesome dad...or
- A guy that showed a crapload of intestinal fortitude in the face of all kinds of adversity beyond his control last season?
If it's a coin toss in terms of talent, I keep Cain.
by Goofus on Dec 5, 2007 5:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I mean Christ on a raft the team put up with Barry's garbage for years on end, you'd think they'd be able to handle a mild rectal itch like Tim's supposed behavior.
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 5, 2007 5:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jwirt19 on Dec 5, 2007 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Inside the Mind of Ralph Barbieri...
Hopefully Matt Cain and his dad aren't speaking.
by tobias on Dec 5, 2007 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because making GIFs is at times therapeutic...

by The Nick on Dec 5, 2007 3:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You...
That's gotta be wrong.
by WalrusMan on Dec 5, 2007 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: You...
by The Nick on Dec 6, 2007 8:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 3:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Anyway, that would be the counterargument to what you're saying.
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 3:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 3:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 3:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 3:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 4:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sticks
Villalona could be ready by 2010. There's also the possibility of getting Smoak or Alonso with our #5 pick in next years draft. Both could be ready for the bigs in a year or so.
Then there's the unknowns of Noonan and Fairley.
by Cainer on Dec 5, 2007 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Sticks
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Sticks
by Cainer on Dec 5, 2007 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Sticks
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by groug on Dec 5, 2007 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Remember this. The only constant around the Braves amazing run in the playoffs was Maddux, Smoltz, and Glavine.
by Sigualicious on Dec 5, 2007 4:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
If the "amazing run" you're referring to was the 11 straight post-season appearances between 1995 and 2005, then a little fact-checking is in order.
Maddux's last season with the team was 2003 and Glavine's was 2002, so they weren't are part of the tail end of the run.
A more accurate statement would be that Smoltz and Chipper Jones were the only constants. (Assuming you're just talking about players.)
by Goofus on Dec 5, 2007 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Either way, no matter how you break it down, their success was built around pitching. The hitters around it were plug and play. Yes, there have been great hitters. But saying Chipper and Smoltz were the only constants and reasons why they were successful is silly. The constant, while maybe not just Maddux Smoltz and Glavine, has been pitching.
They've had Deion in his prime, Justice, Pendelton, McGriff, Gant (when he was good) all different parts throughout the years and they always were successful because the pitching always gave them a chance.
by Sigualicious on Dec 5, 2007 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by SF Pete on Dec 5, 2007 6:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I agree that the Braves success was built around pitching, but saying the only constant was Maddux, Glavine and Smoltz implies that they were all there throughout the run and they weren't.
by Goofus on Dec 5, 2007 10:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Do you think Alex Rios would make the Giants a good-hitting team? Alex wouldn't even replace the contribution of Barry Bonds, let alone make the Giants a better-hitting team than the one that scored the third-least runs of any major league team last season.
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 4:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Buzzword on Dec 5, 2007 3:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Cookyman on Dec 5, 2007 4:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 3:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. The whole premise of the question "what is going to happen in 3 years" is ridiculous to me. A lot can go right, and a lot can go wrong.
For criminy's sake, all I was doing was giving a generic devil's advocate response to what you were saying! I was not trying to speak for myself or anybody else, just a generic template for an argument that makes sense if good things happen over the course of the next 3 years. And I don't feel like getting torn apart for it. I don't have a plan. I don't know the future.
But as far as I am personally concerned: Even if we do chuck one for Rios, the offense is still going to S-U-C-K suck. Where do the rest of the bats come from then? What is your magical solution to a crappy offense that suddenly doesn't have two aces who can give it a chance to win? You still need roughly the same amount of magical unknown things to go right to have a good offense in 2010, except now you don't have one of your aces to boot!
Whatever. I've been on the computer too long and I'm starting to get cranky. Sorry for being so cranky. Alex Rios is NOT the solution. Somebody supe awesome might be, but having Alex Rios instead of one of Cain or Lincecum cannot possibly make us any better in 2010 than we would be without him assuming everything else stays the same. At best, it would be a wash.
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I think it remains, though, that for either Cain or Lincecum to be traded this offseason, it HAS to be for somebody super awesome who is controlled long term.
Saying we need to make a trade for somebody super awesome who we can control long term is all well and good, but those players don't exist on the market. Not since Cabrera and A-Rod got their deals. Why do we need to make a trade that doesn't exist?
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
It would take at least pair of "super awesomes" to make up for one "super wonderful."
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 4:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jwirt19 on Dec 5, 2007 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
I'm not totally opposed to a Lincecum or Cain trade, but we need to get more in return than just one player that doesn't even fill any positional needs.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by S49erfan on Dec 5, 2007 3:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 4:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by S49erfan on Dec 5, 2007 4:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Williams had already played 10 seasons for the Giants. It could very well be argued that he was on the downward side of his career. Not a very great measurement, but he went to one All-Star game after he was traded from the Giants.
Lincecum and Cain are still at the very beginning of their upward slopes. They're at the bottom of the ski-lift waiting to be taken up the slope, while Matt Williams was already a third of the way back down with is snowboard strapped on. That is why this trade is scaring people
Right now, the deal sounds like a "straight up" trade for Rios. Judging on that deal alone, it should give ANY Giants fans nightmares. Rios is no Bonds, so how could he even help this offense? Couple that with now being one short in what could very well be the NL's best (top-to-bottom) rotation next year, and the Giants would be in a world of hurt.
That is why fans are saying "NO," or at least partially why.
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 4:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by S49erfan on Dec 5, 2007 8:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Does Brian Sabean really want to make jponry cry???
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 3:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 3:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Dan from NM on Dec 5, 2007 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
No one is saying that the team doesn't need to do SOMETHING, but that doesn't mean that the something it does should be a bad deal. Signing Zito was "doing something" it was just a stupid something.
If the team is going to deal a frontline starting pitcher who is young, cheap and controllable for years, it needs to get equal to greater value in return. Rios, a good, but not great OF who doesn't fill any positional needs, is less than equal value. IMO, equal value means at least a power-hitting 1b or 3b + something else.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
That's not likely to happen. So, no, I wouldn't rule it out, but I think it's a waste of time for every trade Sabean tries to make to start with Caincecum. He should just label them untouchable unless we get the kind of offer detailed above and move on with the offseason.
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 3:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 4:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
For Lincecum, there are probably fewer than a half dozen players I would take straight up. Cain I would be more willing to part with.
Matt's ceiling is likely an All-Star (which is pretty good). Tim's ceiling is likely a top tier Hall of Famer.
Matt is more proven. Tim has considerably more potential IMO.
by sharksrog on Dec 5, 2007 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by GiantsLover on Dec 5, 2007 4:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Ricciardi still hasn't heard back from the San Francisco Giants, but sources with both teams said there is now just one offer on the table: Alex Rios for Tim Lincecum, even up. No Troy Glaus. No Matt Cain. Nothing else. Ricciardi is ready to make the deal right now. Giants GM Brian Sabean has yet to respond - although he has delayed his daily press briefing with Bay area reporters.
by KCE on Dec 5, 2007 4:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 4:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by Cookyman on Dec 5, 2007 4:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by BigO on Dec 5, 2007 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
He needs to make it clear that a trade involving Linc or Cain has to involve multiple young players with power that are just about mlb-ready. Look what Beane is doing with Haren. He's demanding a ton, and while some people are saying he's asking too much, if and when a deal happens, he'll still likely get a lot.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
/"
According to other reports Sabean has flat out rejected the trade.
Since Sabean's track-record of not letting the press in on what he's up to is well-documented, I'd advise against judging his ability to negotiate based on a speculative press.
As others have pointed out, if Sabean leaks anything, it'll be to drive interest up, not give some writer a scoop.
My guess is that he's throwing chum in the water to start a feeding frenzy. You can't have a bidding war with just one bidder...unless you're the Giants and bidding on Bonds last year.
by Goofus on Dec 5, 2007 5:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by BaronVonCurrentEvents on Dec 5, 2007 5:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 6:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 4:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Cain and Lincecum are going to probably lose 15 games with a 3 ERA whether we trade one of them for Alex Rios or not.
Also: the reply link. Learn it and love it and your conversations will flow much more easily.
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 4:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
The team is better off holding onto the two phenoms and keeping the strength that is their rotation where it is, than to weaken it significantly in exchange for a meager "improvement" on the offensive side.
by sfgfan on Dec 5, 2007 4:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like this?
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 4:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Like this?
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Like this?
by Kitspool on Dec 5, 2007 4:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Like this?
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Like this?
by jponry on Dec 5, 2007 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
No, the offense will not be better if we don't trade for a bat. But if we do trade for a bat and it isn't some sort of .300/.400/1.290 (yes, that is a very big SLG), how will the offense be good enough to keep the leftover ace from losing 20 games next year anyway?
The offense will suck in 2008 if we do not make a trade. The offense will suck in 2008 if we do make a trade, unless it's some kind of super mystery trade that nets two major league ready heart of the order type bats who are not even on the martket right now.
The thing is, Alex Rios is the best hitter on the market right now, PERIOD, and he is not good enough to make these trades remotely worthwhile. Saying we need to make a trade is fine, but if that difference making trade is sitting somewhere in fantasyland, it becomes nothing more than useless blabber.
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
So why not just screw the negative trade we're looking at and go with the other positive trade and the positive signing and be happy with regular old +1+1 = 2.
Because 2 is greater than 1.
by howtheyscored on Dec 5, 2007 4:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because it is not simple math
by wilriv21 on Dec 5, 2007 4:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by ResDog on Dec 5, 2007 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
More recent updates. No No No. This isn't hard.
by Aadik on Dec 5, 2007 4:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by JakeS on Dec 5, 2007 6:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by JakeS on Dec 5, 2007 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by sam23 on Dec 5, 2007 6:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Of course, a non-trade is no help, because he's even worse at free-agent signings. I can't even list the names (or the draft picks they cost). It's too depressing.
The one thing he and his team have done well all these years is draft pitchers. Pitching is risky (injury, flameout, and more injury), but now he's got two pitchers who could be bona-fide stars. And the press is talking about trading one of them for a nice, athletic, above-average right fielder who hits for average with a little pop.
You always trade a pitcher for the everyday player if they're comparably skilled. You never trade a potential star for an above-average player.
by wcw on Dec 5, 2007 7:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
The thing I think that bugs me the most about this trade is that it doesn't really fill any holes. We have a plethora of outfielders but what we really need is corner infielders.
by Sigualicious on Dec 5, 2007 7:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
However, insofar as that 'trade' was essentially a free-agent signing and a buy-low move, I happily put it on the positive side of Sabean's ledger.
Do you really want me to mention the negative names?
by wcw on Dec 5, 2007 7:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by SF Pete on Dec 5, 2007 7:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by rxmeister on Dec 5, 2007 7:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
And for me, as I'm enjoying your bizarre arguments.
by JRPhillips on Dec 6, 2007 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Could Sabean be biding his time to see if Lowry + Hennessy/Correia/Sanchez for Rios becomes more attractive to the Jays?
Rios would be a nice chip to have in place for further building next year and the next, but having a rotation that offers ace-potential pitching 20% of the time for the next five years (or so) just seems smarter.
by sb on Dec 5, 2007 7:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
by rxmeister on Dec 5, 2007 8:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
- The Dodgers have interest in third baseman Pedro Feliz, who are still trying to find a power hitter.
ignore the poor grammar (it's a Dodger story) and then smile.
by nostocksjustbonds on Dec 5, 2007 8:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....

by The Nick on Dec 5, 2007 8:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: The Case Against....
Thank you for the laughs and for reminding me that no matter how bad the clowns at AT&T look next year, we won't have Pedrito to kick around anymo-- (ring, ring) What?! Brian sez if we don't accept Brandon Inge, he'll consider bringing Pedrito back!
Wake me, shake me, when it's over!
by wcovington on Dec 5, 2007 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















